Skip to main content
MycoKeys logoLink to MycoKeys
. 2025 Jul 29;120:35–117. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915

Taxonomy, phylogeny, and bioactive potential of Xylariales (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) from Thailand: novel species discovery, new host and geographical records, and antibacterial properties

Achala R Rathnayaka 1, K W Thilini Chethana 1,, Areerat Manowong 1, Amuhenage T Bhagya 1, Hsan Win 1, Zaw L Tun 1, Ausana Mapook 1, Kevin D Hyde 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC12326179  PMID: 40778230

Abstract

Xylariales (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) comprise a wide range of species that exhibit considerable variation in stromatic characteristics, including conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecia and unitunicate asci. Most known species are endophytes and saprobes, recognized for producing secondary metabolites of fundamental importance in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. The main objectives of this study were to identify novel species, document new host and geographical records within the families Diatrypaceae, Hypoxylaceae, and Xylariaceae in northern and central Thailand, and explore the bioactive properties of secondary metabolites produced by selected Xylariales species. Taxa were identified through morphological examination, supported by phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference based on LSU, ITS, rpb2, and β-tub gene sequences. These taxa are accompanied by comprehensive descriptions and illustrations. Xylariales cultures were screened for preliminary antibacterial activity against the bacterial pathogens Bacillussubtilis (Gram-positive) and Escherichiacoli (Gram-negative). Based on the screening results, two newly introduced species (Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense and Hypoxylonthailandicum) and two known species (Xylariachrysanthum and Daldiniaeschscholtzii), which exhibited antibacterial activity, were selected for secondary metabolite extraction. Crude extracts from these isolates were chemically profiled using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Q-TOF analyses, revealing a variety of potential compounds. The present study enhances our understanding of the taxonomic diversity and bioactive potential of Xylariales by introducing five new species, reporting nine new host records—including one new geographical record—and evaluating the bioactive properties of selected Xylariales cultures.

Key words: 5 new species, Ascomycota, morphology, multi-gene phylogeny, preliminary screening test

Introduction

Xylariales was established by Nannfeldt (1932) with Xylariaceae as the type family, along with Diatrypaceae, Hypocreaceae, Hyponectriaceae, Lasiosphaeriaceae, and Polystigmataceae. Initially, Xylariales species were mainly classified based on morphological characters (Hawksworth et al. 1995). However, the incorporation of molecular data has since diversified the classification criteria (Eriksson et al. 2003). Smith et al. (2003) conducted the first multi-gene analysis and identified seven families within this order. Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2010) listed six families, while Senanayake et al. (2015) included eleven families in Xylariales. Based on morphology and multi-gene analyses, Hyde et al. (2020a) accepted fifteen families in Xylariales. Fasciatisporaceae was introduced by Hyde et al. (2020a) to accommodate Fasciatispora within Xylariales, which comprises twenty families as outlined by Wijayawardene et al. (2022). However, some taxa in this order are considered genera incertae sedis due to the uncertainty of their taxonomic positions (Hyde et al. 2020a). Currently, Xylariales is considered the second-largest order in Xylariomycetidae, with 160 genera placed at the family level and 52 in genera incertae sedis (Hyde et al. 2020b; Phukhamsakda et al. 2020; Konta et al. 2021). Recently, Samarakoon et al. (2022) revised the taxonomy of xylarialean taxa based on morphology coupled with molecular phylogeny and accepted 57 genera incertae sedis in Xylariales. Hyde et al. (2024) and Thiyagaraja et al. (2025) included 22 families, expanding the taxonomic framework of Xylariales.

Xylariales species possess both conspicuous and inconspicuous fruiting bodies and are unitunicate, perithecial ascomycetes (Smith et al. 2003). This is a diverse group of fungi with distinct stromatic characteristics, which play a major role in generic and family-level classification (Jayawardena et al. 2022; Phukhamsakda et al. 2022; Samarakoon et al. 2022; 2023). In some xylarialean taxa, a distinct morphological character called the clypeus is present. It consists of stromatic tissues or melanized hyphae that develop above partially submerged or immersed ascomata. The clypeus forms a shield-shaped structure with variable development (Læssøe and Spooner 1993). Xylariales species occur as saprobes and endophytes in temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions worldwide, associated with wood, fallen fruits or seeds, fallen leaves or petioles, and termite nests (U’Ren et al. 2016; Fournier et al. 2018).

Within Xylariales, Xylariaceae and Hypoxylaceae are the most well-known families, producing secondary metabolites significant to the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. Some endophytic Xylariales species, such as Hypoxylonrubiginosum and Xylariacf.curta, are used for biological control due to their strong antagonistic effects against fungal and other pathogens (Halecker et al. 2020; Becker and Stadler 2021; Chen et al. 2024). Xylariaceae is considered one of the largest and most diverse families in Xylariales and comprises 42 genera and nearly 852 species (Hyde et al. 2024). Xylaria, the largest genus in Xylariaceae, was introduced with X.hypoxylon as the type species (Peršoh et al. 2009). Most Xylariaceae species are endophytes or saprobes, although a few have been reported as pathogens (Rogers 2000; Okane et al. 2008; Stadler et al. 2013; Husbands et al. 2018; Pourmoghaddam et al. 2022). These species can be found in wood, leaves, fruits, seeds, dung, and soil (Karimi et al. 2024). The family is characterized by embedded, well-developed ascomata and dark-colored stromata, which may be reduced or absent. The asci are 8-spored, unitunicate, and cylindrical and may possess an amyloid apical ring. The ascospores are pigmented and exhibit germ slits or pores (Rogers 2000). The asexual morph is characterized by holoblastic conidia and sympodially or occasionally percurrently proliferating conidiogenous cells (Rogers 2000).

Hypoxylaceae comprises 19 genera and approximately 422 species (Hyde et al. 2024). Within this family, Annulohypoxylon and Hypoxylon are the largest genera, comprising 69 and 235 species, respectively (Karimi et al. 2024). Hypoxylaceae species have a cosmopolitan distribution and occur as saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens (Reyes et al. 2024). This family is characterized by erect, glomerate, pulvinate, discoid, effused-pulvinate, hemispherical, spherical, or peltate stromata, which may be solitary or confluent, brightly colored, dark or black, pruinose, or smooth. Some stromata can produce extractable pigments visible in 10% KOH (Reyes et al. 2024). The perithecia are spherical, obovoid, or tubular, with spherical, umbilicate, or papillate ostioles, with or without discs formed by dehiscence of the surrounding tissue. A nodulisporium-like asexual state, distinguishable from that in Xylariaceae, occurs in Hypoxylaceae species (Reyes et al. 2024).

In Xylariales, diatrypaceous taxa are abundant and widely distributed (Ma et al. 2023). Diatrypaceae species occur as saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens on a wide range of crops and woody plants (Vasilyeva and Ma 2014; Konta et al. 2020a; Samarakoon et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023). Members of this family can produce extracellular, ligninolytic enzymes that degrade plant cell walls, playing an important role in wood decomposition (Bucher et al. 2004; Trouillas et al. 2011; Mehrabi et al. 2015). Diatrypaceae species are characterized by eustromatic or pseudostromatic, black or dark brown, erumpent to immersed, and occasionally superficial stromata. Ostioles are present in the perithecia. The asci are 8-spored or polysporous, occasionally with one or two spores, and are unitunicate. The ascospores are ellipsoidal, globose, filiform, or allantoid, and hyaline to light brown (Senanayake et al. 2015). The asexual morph is characterized by acervulus-like subcortical, erumpent conidiomata. The conidia are hyaline, filiform, curved, or rarely straight (Senanayake et al. 2015; Wijayawardene et al. 2017; Phukhamsakda et al. 2022). Currently, Diatrypaceae comprises 31 genera (Hyde et al. 2024). Given the widespread occurrence and varied lifestyles of Xylariales species, further taxonomic and ecological studies are essential.

Within Xylariales, the families Hypoxylaceae and Xylariaceae are the most prolific producers of secondary metabolites (Becker and Stadler 2021). Numerous unique secondary metabolites have been discovered from the stromata and mycelial cultures of Xylariales fungi, many of which have potential pharmaceutical and agrochemical applications (Becker and Stadler 2021). For example, Kretzschmariazonata, a plant pathogenic fungus, produces various enzymes such as β-glucosidases, endoglucanases, hemicellulases, pectinases, and xylanases (da Luz Morales et al. 2021). In Xylariaceae, Xylaria species have yielded a wide range of bioactive compounds, including alkaloids, aromatic compounds, cytochalasins, polyketides, and terpenoids. These compounds exhibit diverse biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities (Chen et al. 2024). Additionally, Whalley and Edwards (1995, 1998) reported that many chemical metabolites produced by Xylariaceae cultures exhibit a degree of genus specificity.

Beyond their bioactivity, chemotaxonomic data support the segregation of genera within Hypoxylaceae, such as Annulohypoxylon, Hypomontagnella, Hypoxylon, and Jackrogersella (Becker et al. 2020; Cedeño-Sanchez et al. 2024). Species in Hypoxylaceae are known to produce a diverse array of secondary metabolites, particularly azaphilones and binaphthalenes (Kuhnert et al. 2021). To date, more than 200 metabolites with various bioactivities have been identified from Hypoxylon species, including hypoxyloamide, 8-methoxynaphthalene-1,7-diol, and hypoxylonol, which exhibit antimicrobial and anticancer activities (Tan and Zou 2001; Cheng et al. 2020). The growing focus on chemotaxonomic studies of Xylariales species is likely to uncover many previously unknown secondary metabolites with significant bioactive potential.

The main objectives of this study are to introduce five novel taxa, report nine new host records including one new geographical record of species belonging to Diatrypaceae, Hypoxylaceae, and Xylariaceae in Xylariales, and to investigate bioactive compounds produced by cultures of selected Xylariales species. Morphological characteristics and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) confirmed the phylogenetic placement of the studied fungal taxa within the order Xylariales. Preliminary antibacterial screening was conducted for selected species, including newly described taxa in Annulohypoxylon and Hypoxylon. Additionally, bioactive compounds from the cultures of these species were analyzed using HPLC/Q-TOF techniques.

Materials and methods

Specimen collections, morphological studies, and isolations

Specimens (dead wood) were collected during March–July 2024 in Thailand. Samples were enclosed in zip-lock plastic bags and transported to the laboratory. Observations followed the methodology of Senanayake et al. (2020). Morphological characteristics were examined using a LEICA EZ4 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and an AXIOSKOP 2 PLUS compound microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). Microscopic structures were photographed with a Canon 550D digital camera mounted on the microscope. Melzer’s reagent, Congo red, and Indian ink were used as needed. Measurements were made using ZEN2 (Blue Edition) software and calculated with the Tarosoft® Image Framework program. Figures and photo plates were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 10.0 (Adobe Systems, USA).

Single-spore isolations were carried out on potato dextrose agar (PDA) following Senanayake et al. (2020). Herbarium specimens were deposited at the Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand, and living cultures were preserved in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC). For newly introduced taxa, Faces of Fungi numbers were obtained according to Jayasiri et al. (2015), and Index Fungorum numbers were registered via Index Fungorum (2025). All data generated in this study were deposited in the Greater Mekong Subregion Fungal Database (Chaiwan et al. 2021).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 50–100 mg of fungal mycelium using the E.Z.N.A Fungal DNA Mini Kit (D3390-02, Omega Bio-Tek, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at 4 °C for short-term use and at -20 °C for long-term storage. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed for the large subunit rDNA (LSU), the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), β-tubulin (β-tub), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) gene regions as described in previous studies (Thiyagaraja et al. 2019; Konta et al. 2020a; Karimi et al. 2023).

The LSU, ITS, β-tub, and rpb2 gene regions were amplified using the primers LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Rehner and Samuels 1994), ITS4/ITS5 (White et al. 1990), T1/T22 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997), Bt2a/Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995), and fRPB2-5f/fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), respectively. PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 50 μl, consisting of 25 μl of 2× Power Taq PCR Master Mix, 1 μl of each forward and reverse primer, 2 μl of genomic DNA, and 21 μl of deionized water. The PCR products were visualized on 1.5% agarose gels, stained with 4S Green Stain, and subsequently sequenced at SolGent Co., Ltd. (South Korea). Newly generated nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1.

Taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis and their GenBank accession numbers. New isolates generated in this study are in bold, and type strains are indicated in superscript ‘T’.

Species Strain no. GenBank accession numbers References
LSU ITS rpb2 β-tub
Allocryptovalsacastaneicola CFCC52432T NR 177157 NA Zhu et al. (2021)
A.cryptovalsoidea HVFIG02T HQ692573 HQ692524 Trouillas et al. (2011)
A.elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0707 MN308410 MN340296 Konta et al. (2020b)
A.polyspora MFLUCC 17-0364 T MF959500 MG334556 Senwanna et al. (2017)
A.sichuanensis HKAS 107017T NR 175673 MW775592 Samarakoon et al. (2022)
A.xishuangbanica GMB0417 OP935176 OP938739 Li et al. (2023)
A.xishuangbanica KUMCC 21-0830T ON041128 ON081498 Maharachchikumbura et al. (2022)
Allodiatrypealbelloscutata IFRD 9100T OK257020 N/A Li et al. (2022a)
A.albelloscutata KUNCC 23-15531 PP584727 N/A Dissanayake et al. (2024)
A.arengae MFLUCC 15-0713 T MN308411 MN340297 Konta et al. (2020b)
A.elaeidicola MFLUCC 15-0737T MN308415 MN340299 Konta et al. (2020b)
A.elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0708b MN308413 N/A Konta et al. (2020b)
Alloeutypaflavovirens CBS 272. 87 AJ302457 DQ006959 Rolshausen et al. (2006)
A.milinensis FCATAS 4309T OP538689 OP557595 Ma et al. (2023)
A.milinensis FCATAS 4382 OP538690 OP557596 Ma et al. (2023)
Annulohypoxylonalbidiscum MFLUCC 15-0645T N/A KU852741 N/A N/A Li et al. (2016)
A.annulatum DSM:107931 MK287546 MK287534 MK287559 MK287572 Sir et al. (2019)
A.archeri SFC20220920-G065 N/A MW497176 N/A N/A Lee et al. (2023)
A.areolatum MFLUCC 14-1233T N/A NR_153554 N/A KX376344 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.atroroseum EK14006 N/A KP401581 N/A KP401588 Sir et al. (2015)
A.bahnphadengense STMA 13115 N/A KX376338 N/A KX376347 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.bahnphadengense MFLUCC 24-0608 PQ860996 PQ861001 PQ878514 N/A This study
A.bovei PDD:119612 N/A PP965769 PP963634 PP963581 Johansen and Johnston (2011)
A.chiangraiense MFLUCC 24-0606T PV468228 PP988691 PV426649 PV426648 This study
A.cohaerens CBS 119126 N/A KC477233 N/A N/A Stadler et al. (2013)
A.crowfoothodgkiniae BRIP 72527hT OP598059 OP599617 N/A N/A Tan and Shivas (2022a)
A.crowfoothodgkiniae MFLUCC 25-0023 PQ860994 PQ860999 N/A PV443841 This study
A.fulvum MUCL 54617 N/A KX376336 N/A KX376355 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.kwolekiae BRIP 72473aT PP348248 NR_182614 N/A N/A Tan and Shivas (2022a)
A.lancangensis ZHKUCC 23-0104T OR224539 OR224542 N/A N/A Liu et al. (2025)
A.leptascum MFLUCC 13-0587 N/A KU604576 N/A KU604580 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.macrosporum ST2584 N/A DQ322097 N/A N/A Suwannasai (2005)
A.maeteangense CBS 123835 N/A KX376322 N/A N/A Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.massivum MUCL 47218T N/A AM749938 N/A KC977276 Bitzer et al. (2008); Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
A.michelianum CBS 119993 KY610423 KX376320 N/A KX271239 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.microdiscum YMJ 90080807 N/A EF026137 N/A AY951660 Hsieh et al. (2010)
A.minutellum CBS 119015 N/A JX658447 N/A KX271240 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.moriforme CBS 123579 KY610425 KX376321 KY624289 KX271261 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.nitens MFLUCC 12-0823 KJ934992 KJ934991 KJ934994 KJ934993 Daranagama et al. (2015)
A.nouraguense MUCL 54607 N/A KX376335 N/A KX376348 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.palmicola MFLUCC 11-0020T NG 071242 KT369002 N/A N/A Ariyawansa et al. (2015)
A.purpureonitens ST2448 N/A DQ223756 N/A N/A Suwannasai (2005)
A.purpureonitens MFLUCC 24-0609 PQ860997 PQ861002 PQ878515 N/A This study
A.purpureopigmentum MUCL:54616 N/A KC968942 N/A KC977306 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
A.squamulosum YMJ 90081905 N/A EF026139 N/A AY951665 Hsieh et al. (2010)
A.spougei SWUF09-032 N/A OL449769 PP598908 PP598940 Pimjuk et al. (2022)
A.spougei MFLUCC 24-0607 PQ860995 PQ861000 PQ878513 N/A This study
A.stygium MFLUCC 12-0826T KJ940869 KJ940870 KJ940868 KJ940867 Daranagama et al. (2015)
A.subnitens MUCL 54594 PP348087 KX376333 N/A N/A Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.substygium MUCL 51708 N/A KC968915 N/A KC977285 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.substygium STMA 14066 N/A KU604575 N/A KU159526 Sir et al. (2016)
A.thailandicum MFLUCC 13-0118T NG_228734 NR_153529 N/A KX376349 Liu et al. (2015)
A.truncatum CBS 140778T N/A NR_153580 KY624277 KX376352 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.truncatum DSM: 107925 MK287543 MK287531 MK287556 MK287569 Sir et al. (2019)
A.urceolatum EK14014 N/A KP401582 N/A KP401589 Sir et al. (2015)
A.violaceopigmentum MFLUCC 14-1225 N/A KX376326 N/A KX376343 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.violaceopigmentum MFLUCC 24-0610 PQ860998 PQ861003 PQ878516 N/A This study
A.viridistratum MFLUCC 14-1224 PP356919 KX376325 PP598916 KX376342 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
A.yungensis STMA 14046 N/A KX376323 N/A KX376340 Kuhnert et al. (2017)
Anthostomadecipiens IPV-FW349 AM399021 AM920693 Luque et al. (2012)
A.decipiens JL567 JN975370 JN975407 Luque et al. (2012)
Astrocystisbambusae GMB0700 PP146578 PP209113 Li et al. (2024)
A.bambusae HAST 89021904 GU322449 GQ844836 GQ495942 Hsieh et al. (2010)
A.bambusae MFLUCC 25-0022 PQ844814 PQ855789 PQ855790 This study
A.cocoes GMB0037 MW732441 MW755333 MW755339 Wu et al. (2021)
A.concavispora MFLUCC 14-0174 KP297404 KP340532 KP406615 Daranagama et al. (2015)
A.dinghuensis GMB0704 PP133237 PP198070 PP197684 Li et al. (2024)
A.dinghuensis GMB0783 PP133238 PP198071 PP197683 Li et al. (2024)
A.guizhouensis GMB0705 PP133239 PP198072 PP197682 Li et al. (2024)
A.guizhouensis GMB0796 PP133240 PP198073 PP197681 Li et al. (2024)
A.heterocyclae GMB0706 PP153340 PP198074 PP197680 Li et al. (2024)
A.heterocyclae GMB0788 PP153341 PP198075 PP197679 Li et al. (2024)
A.mirabilis HAST 94070803 GU322448 GQ844835 GQ495941 Hsieh et al. (2010)
A.multiloculata GMB0033 MW732439 MW755330 MW755336 Wu et al. (2021)
A.pseudomirabilis GMB0122T ON471845 ON462000 ON461996 Li et al. (2022b)
A.sichuanensis GMB0708 PP153343 PP198076 PP197678 Li et al. (2024)
A.sichuanensis GMB0709 PP153342 N/A PP197677 Li et al. (2024)
A.sublimbata HAST 89032207 GU322447 GQ844834 GQ495940 Hsieh et al. (2010)
A.tessellati GMB0120T ON471849 ON462003 ON461994 Li et al. (2022b)
Biscogniauxiapetrensis HKAS 102388 MW240544 MW240615 MW342619 MW775576 Samarakoon et al. (2022)
Collodisculabambusae GZUH0102 KP054279 KP276675 KP276674 Li et al. (2015)
C.baoshanensis GMB0720 PP153344 PP198077 PP197676 Li et al. (2024)
C.baoshanensis GMB0795 PP153345 PP198078 PP197675 Li et al. (2024)
C.fangjingshanensis GZUH0109T KR002590 KR002591 KR002592 Li et al. (2015)
C.japonica CBS:124266 JF440974 KY624273 KY624316 Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012)
C.lancangjiangensis GMB0030T MW732442 N/A MW755343 Wu et al. (2021)
C.leigongshanensis GZUH0107 KP054281 KR002588 KR002587 Li et al. (2015)
C.quadrangularis GMB0722 PP153347 PP197674 Li et al. (2024)
C.quadrangularis GMB0784 PP153346 PP197673 Li et al. (2024)
C.tubulosa GACP QR0111 MN017302 MN018403 MN018405 Xie et al. (2020)
Cryptosphaeriaeunomia CBS 216.87 AJJ02417 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
C.eunomia CBS 223.87 AJ302421 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
C.ligniota CBS 273. 87T KT425233 KT425168 Acero et al. (2004)
C.pullmanensis ATCC 52655 KT425235 KT425170 Trouillas et al. (2015)
C.subcutanea CBS 240. 87T NR_138412 KT425167 Trouillas et al. (2015)
C.subcutanea DSUB100A KT425189 KT425124 Trouillas et al. (2015)
Cryptovalsaampelina A001 GQ293901 GQ293972 Trouillas et al. (2010)
C.ampelina DRO101 GQ293902 GQ293982 Trouillas et al. (2010)
Daldiniabambusicola CBS 122872T MH874769 MH863245 KY624241 N/A Vu et al. (2019)
D.childiae CBS 122881T MH874773 NR_172249 KU684290 KU684129 U’Ren et al. (2016)
D.concentrica CBS 113277 KY610434 JX658475 KY624243 KC977274 Wendt et al. (2018)
D.dennisii CBS 114741 KY610435 JX658477 KY624244 KC977262 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Stadler et al. (2014); Wendt et al. (2018)
D.eschscholtzii MUCL 45435 KY610437 PQ632365 KY624246 KC977266 Wendt et al. (2018)
D.petriniae MUCL 49214 KY610439 JX658512 KY624248 KC977261 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Stadler et al. (2014); Wendt et al. (2018)
D.placentiformis MUCL 47603 KY610440 AM749921 KY624249 KC977278 Wendt et al. (2018)
D.vernicosa CBS 119316T KY610442 NR_152501 KY624252 N/A Wendt et al. (2018)
Diatrypebetulaceicola FCATAS 2725T OM040386 OM240966 Yang et al. (2022a)
D.betulae CFCC 52416T NR_177156 MW656391 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.betulae GMB0426 OP935181 OP938750 Li et al. (2023)
D.bullata UCDDCh400 DQ006946 DQ007002 Rolshausen et al. (2006)
D.camelliae-japonicae GMB0427 T NR_198356 OP938734 Li et al. (2023)
D.camelliae-japonicae GMB0428 OP935173 OP938735 Li et al. (2023)
D.castaneicola CFCC 52425T NR_177155 MW656389 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.disciformis MFLU 17-1549 MW240629 N/A Samarakoon et al. (2022)
D.disciformis MFLUCC 15-0538T KR092795 N/A Senanayake et al. (2015)
D.enteroxantha GMB0433 OP935170 OP938736 Li et al. (2023)
D.enteroxantha HUEFS 155112 KM396624 KR869728 de Almeida et al. (2016)
D.enteroxantha HUEFS 155116 KM396618 N/A de Almeida et al. (2016)
D.lancangensis GMB 0045T NR_174916 MW814885 Long et al. (2021)
D.lancangensis GMB 0046 MW797114 MW814886 Long et al. (2021)
D.larissae FCATAS_2723T OM040384 OM240964 Yang et al. (2022a)
D.lijiangensis MFLU 19-0717T MK852582 MK852583 Thiyagaraja et al. (2019)
D.linzhiensis FCATAS 4304T OP538691 OP557597 Ma et al. (2023)
D.linzhiensis FCATAS 4381 OP538692 OP557598 Ma et al. (2023)
D.palmicola MFLUCC 11-0018T NR_185365 N/A Liu et al. (2015)
D.palmicola MFLUCC 11-0020 KP744439 N/A Liu et al. (2015)
D.quercicola CFCC 52418T NR_177154 MW656386 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.rubi GMB0429T OP935182 OP938740 Li et al. (2023)
D.rubi GMB0430 OP935183 OP938741 Li et al. (2023)
D.spilomea D17C AJ302433 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
D.stigma DCASH200 GQ293947 GQ294003 Trouillas et al. (2015)
D.undulata D20C AJ302436 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
D.virescens CBS:128344 MH864890 N/A Vu et al. (2019)
D.whitmanensis Bent023 OP038009 OP079844 Travadon et al. (2022)
Diatrypellaatlantica HUEFS 136873 KM396614 KR259647 de Almeida et al. (2016)
D.banksiae CPC 29118T NR_154026 N/A Crous et al. (2016)
D.betulae CFCC 52406T NR_177150 MW656379 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.betulicola CFCC 52411T NR_177152 MW656383 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.delonicis MFLUCC 15-1014T MH812994 MH847790 Hyde et al. (2019)
D.delonicis MFLU 16-1032 MH812995 MH847791 Hyde et al. (2019)
D.elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0279T MN308417 MN340300 Konta et al. (2020a)
D.fatsiae-japonica GMB 0422T OP935184 OP938744 Li et al. (2023)
D.fatsiae-japonica GMB 0423 OP935185 OP938745 Li et al. (2023)
D.favacea DL26C AJ302440 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
D.favacea CFCC 52409 MW632934 MW656382 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.frostii UFMGCB 1917 HQ377280 N/A Vieira et al. (2011)
D.guiyangensis GMB 0414T OP935188 OP938742 Li et al. (2023)
D.guiyangensis GMB 0415 OP935189 OP938743 Li et al. (2023)
D.heveae MFLUCC 15-0274 MN308418 MN340301 Konta et al. (2020b)
D.heveae MFLUCC 17-0368T MF959501 MG334557 Senwanna et al. (2017)
D.hubeiensis CFCC 52413T NR_177153 MW656385 Zhu et al. (2021)
D.iranensis KDQ18 T KM245033 N/A Mehrabi et al. (2015)
D.kunmingensis KUNCC 23-15532T PP584732 PP982304 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.kunmingensis KUNCC 23-15533 PP584733 PP982305 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.łongiasca KUMCC 20-0021T MW039349 MW239658 Dissanayake et al. (2021)
D.macrospora IRAN 2344C KR605648 KY352430 Mehrabi et al. (2019)
D.oregonensis CA117 GQ293934 GQ293996 Trouillas et al. (2010)
D.oregonensis DPL200 GQ293940 GQ293999 Trouillas et al. (2010)
D.pseudooregonensis GMB0041T NR_174917 MW814890 Long et al. (2021)
D.pseudooregonensis GMB0040 MW797117 MW814889 Long et al. (2021)
D.pulvinata H048 FR715523 FR715495 de Almeida et al. (2016)
D.pulvinata MEND-F-0815 OQ357998 OQ379485 Spetik et al. (2024)
D.quercina MFLU 18-1865 ON705330 ON713468 Jayawardena et al. (2022)
D.tectonae MFLUCC 12-0172aT KY283084 N/A Shang et al. (2017)
D.tectonae MFLUCC 12-0172bT KY283085 KY421043 Shang et al. (2017)
D.thailandica MFLU 24-0533T PQ164184 PV443842 This study
D.thailandica MFLU 24-0534 PV445684 PV443843 This study
D.verruciformis UCROK1467 JX144793 JX174093 Lynch et al. (2013)
D.verruciformis UCROK754 JX144783 JX174083 Lynch et al. (2013)
D.vulgaris HVFRA02 HQ692591 HO692503 Trouillas et al. (2011)
D.vulgaris HVGRF03T HQ692590 HQ692502 Trouillas et al. (2011)
D.vulgaris KUNCC 23-15534 PP584734 PP982306 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.vulgaris KUNCC 23-15535 PP584735 PP982307 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.vulgaris KUNCC 23-15536 PP584736 PP982308 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.vulgaris KUNCC 23-15537 PP584737 PP982309 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
D.yunnanensis VT01T MN653008 MN887112 Hyde et al. (2020a)
Durothecacrateriformis GMBC0205T MH645425 NG_068849 MH645427 MH645424 De Long et al. (2019)
D.eurima CGMB0060 MH645417 MH645419 MH645418 MH049437 De Long et al. (2019)
D.guizhouensis HKAS 101453T NG_068848 NR_169679 MH645431 MH645428 De Long et al. (2019)
D.rogersii GMBC0204 MH645434 MH645433 MH645435 MH645432 De Long et al. (2019)
D.rogersii YMJ 92031201T N/A NR_186907 JX507794 EF025612 Hsieh et al. (2010)
Entonaemaliquescens CNF 2/11263 OQ865124 OQ869784 OQ877106 OQ877117 Pošta et al. (2023)
Eutypalaevata CBS 291.87 HM164737 HM164771 Trouillas and Gubler (2010)
E.lata EP18 HQ692611 HQ692501 Trouillas et al. (2011)
E.lata RGA01 HQ692614 HQ692497 Trouillas et al. (2011)
E.armeniacae ATCC 28120 DQ006948 DQ006975 Rolshausen et al. (2006)
E.camelliae HKAS 107022T NR_175674 MW775593 Samarakoon et al. (2022)
E.cerasi GMB 0048T NR_174915 MW814893 Long et al. (2021)
E.cerasi GMB 0049 MW797105 MW814877 Long et al. (2021)
Eutypellacearensis HUEFS 131070 KM396639 N/A de Almeida et al. (2016)
E.cerviculata EL59C AJ302468 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
E.cerviculata M68T JF340269 N/A Arhipova et al. (2012)
E.parasitica CBS 210.39T MH855984 N/A Vu et al. (2019)
E.quercina IRAN 2543CT NR_171806 KY352449 Mehrabi et al. (2019)
E.semicircularis MP4669 JQ517314 N/A Mehrabi et al. (2016)
E.motuoensis FCATAS 4379 OP538694 OP557600 Ma et al. (2023)
E.motuoensis FCATAS 4082T OP538693 OP557599 Ma et al. (2023)
Graphostromaplatystomum CBS 270.87T JX658535 KY624296 N/A Wendt et al. (2018)
Halocryptovalsasalicorniae MFLUCC 15-0185 MH304410 MH370274 Dayarathne et al. (2020a)
Halodiatrypeavicenniae MFLUCC 15-0953T KX573916 KX573931 Dayarathne et al.(2016)
H.salinicola MFLUCC 15-1277T KX573915 KX573932 Dayarathne et al.(2016)
Haloroselliniakrabiensis MFLU 17-2596T NR_166289 N/A MN431493 Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.oceanica BCC: 60405 MK606079 N/A N/A Yoiprommarat et al. (2019)
H.rhizophorae MFLU 17-2591 MN047118 N/A MN431492 Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.xylocarpi MFLU 18-0545T NR_166290 N/A MN077076 Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.xylocarpi MFLU 24-0536 PV436687 N/A N/A This study
H.xylocarpi MFLUCC 25-0025 PV436688 N/A N/A This study
Hypomontagnellabarbarensis STMA 14081T MK131718 MK131720 MK135891 MK135893 Lambert et al. (2019)
H.hibisci MFLUCC 24-0613T PV468230 PQ164174 PV476726 PV469694 This study
H.hibisci MFLU 24-0532 N/A PV459061 PV476727 PV469695 This study
H.monticulosa MUCL 54604T KY610487 KY610404 KY624305 KX271273 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.monticulosa MFLUCC 24-0612 PV468229 PP980679 PQ999133 PQ999134 This study
H.submonticulosa CBS 115280 KY610457 KC968923 KY624226 KC977267 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
Hypoxylonaddis MUCL 52797T N/A KC968931 N/A KC977287 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.anthochroum YMJ 9 N/A JN660819 N/A AY951703 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.aurantium MFLU 16-1202T NG_068298 NR_166287 MN077081 N/A Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.aurantium MFLU 18-0531 MN017879 MN047115 MN077081 N/A Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.aveirense MUM 19.40T NG_243120 NR_173851 N/A N/A Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.baruense UCH 9545T NG_228989 NR_169973 PP732079 MK908142 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023, 2024)
H.begae YMJ 215 N/A JN660820 N/A AY951704 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.begae YMJ 215 N/A JN660820 N/A AY951704 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.bellicolor UCH 9543 N/A MN056425 N/A MK908139 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2020)
H.bimaculatum GYJF21259 N/A OR415331 N/A N/A Fournier et al. (2024)
H.blackburniae BRIP 72467bT NG_149119 NR_182618 N/A N/A Tan and Shivas (2022b)
H.brevisporum YMJ 36 N/A JN660821 N/A AY951705 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.calileguense STMA 14059T N/A NR_167964 N/A KU604579 Sir et al. (2016)
H.calileguense STMA 14070 N/A KU604565 KY624271 KU604578 Sir et al. (2016)
H.canariense MUCL 47224 ON954140 ON792787 OP251029 N/A Stadler et al. (2008)
H.carneum MUCL 54177 KY610480 KY610400 KY624297 KX271270 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.cercidicola CBS 119009 KY610444 KC968908 KY624254 KX271270 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.chionostomum STMA 14060 ON954144 KU604563 OP251030 N/A Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.chrysalidosporum FCATAS2710T OL615106 OL467294 OL584222 OL584229 Ma et al. (2022a)
H.cinnabarinum UCH9546 N/A MN056429 N/A MK908143 Cedeño–Sanchez et al. (2020)
H.crocopeplum CNF 2/11316T OQ869786 OQ865120 OQ877107 OQ877118 Pošta et al. (2023)
H.cyclobalanopsidis FCATAS2714T OL615108 OL467298 OL584225 OL584232 Ma et al. (2022a)
H.damuense FCATAS 4207T ON075433 ON075427 ON093251 ON093245 Song et al. (2022)
H.dieckmannii YMJ 45 N/A JN979412 N/A AY951712 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.dieckmannii YMJ 89041203 N/A JN979413 N/A AY951713 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.erythrostroma MUCL 53759 ON954154 KC968910 OP251031 KC977296 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.eurasiaticum MUCL 57720T N/A MW367851 MW373852 MW373861 Lambert et al. (2021)
H.fendleri MUCL 54792 KY610481 KF234421 KY624298 KF300547 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.fendleri DSM:107927 MK287545 MK287533 MK287558 MK287571 Sir et al. (2019)
H.ferrugineum CBS 141259 N/A KX090079 N/A KX090080 Friebes and Wendelin (2016)
H.flavoargillaceum STMA 14062 N/A KU604577 N/A KU159532 Sir et al. (2016)
H.fragiforme YMJ 383 N/A JN979420 N/A AY951720 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.fragiforme MUCL 51264T KM186295 KC477229 KM186296 KX271282 Stadler et al. (2013); Daranagama et al. (2015); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.fraxinophilum MUCL 54176T N/A KC968938 N/A KC977301 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.fuscoides MUCL 52670 ON954145 ON792789 OP251038 ON813076 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.fuscopurpureum YMJ 67 N/A JN979421 N/A AY951721 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.fuscum CBS 113049T KY610482 KY610401 KY624299 KX271271 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.fuscum STMA 13090 KY610482 KY610401 N/A KX271271 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.fuscum 43621 MW367847 MW367856 MW373857 MW373866 Lambert et al. (2021)
H.gibriacense MUCL 52698T NG_228990 NR_137100 OP251026 ON813074 Fournier et al. (2010a)
H.griseobrunneum CBS 331.73T MH872399 KY610402 KY624300 KC977303 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018); Vu et al. (2019)
H.guilanense MUCL 57726T MT214992 MT214997 MT212235 MT212239 Pourmoghaddam et al. (2020)
H.guizhouense KUNCC 23-15544T NG_244017 PP584753 PP993509 PP951419 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
H.guizhouense KUNCC 23-15545 PP584827 PP584754 PP993510 PP951420 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
H.haematostroma MUCL 53301T KY610484 KC968911 KY624301 KC977291 Lambert et al. (2019)
H.hainanense FCATAS2712T OL616132 NR_184951 OL584224 OL584231 Ma et al. (2022a)
H.hinnuleum CBS 286.62T NG_064032 NR_145212 N/A N/A Bitzer et al. (2008)
H.hinnuleum DSM 107932 MK287547 N/A MK287560 MK287573 Sir et al. (2019)
H.hongheensis KUMCC 21-0452 OM001334 OM001333 ON392008 ON468655 Yang et al. (2022b)
H.hongheensis HKAS 122663 OM001339 OM001336 ON392009 ON468656 Yang et al. (2022b)
H.howeanum MUCL 47599 KY610448 AM749928 KY624258 KC977277 Bitzer et al. (2008); Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.howeanum CNF 2/11315 OQ865215 OQ865216 OQ877109 OQ877120 Pošta et al. (2023)
H.hypomiltum MUCL 51845 KY610449 KY610403 KY624302 KX271249 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.inaequale HKAS 123207T N/A NR_185719 N/A OQ652093 Jayawardena et al. (2022)
H.invadens MUCL 51475T MT809132 MT809133 MT813037 MT813038 Becker et al. (2020)
H.investiens CBS 118183 KY610450 KC968925 KY624259 KC977270 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.isabellinum MUCL 53308T NG_228991 NR_155157 OP251032 KC977295 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.jaklitschii CBS 135869 N/A KM610281 N/A KM610295 Kuhnert et al. (2015)
H.jecorinum YMJ 39 N/A JN979429 N/A AY951731 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.jianfengense FCATAS845T MZ029707 MW984546 MZ047260 MZ047264 Song et al. (2022)
H.laschii MUCL 52796 ON954147 JX658525 OP251027 ON813075 Stadler et al. (2014)
H.lateripigmentum MUCL 53304T KY610486 KC968933 KY624304 KC977290 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.lechatii MUCL 54609 ON954148 KF923407 OP251033 KF923405 Kuhnert et al. (2014b)
H.lenormandii CBS 119003 KY610452 KC968943 KY624261 KC977273 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.lenormandii MFLUCC 13-0311 KM039136 KM039135 KM039137 KM039138 Daranagama et al. (2015)
H.lienhwacheense MFLUCC 14-1231 MK287550 KU604558 MK287563 KU159522 Sir et al. (2019)
H.liviae CBS 115282T N/A NR_155154 N/A KC977265 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.lividicolor YMJ 70 N/A JN979432 N/A AY951734 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.lividipigmentum STMA14045 ON954149 ON792788 PP732080 ON813077 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.lividipigmentum YMJ 233 N/A JN979433 N/A AY951735 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.macrocarpum CBS 119012 ON954151 ON792785 ON813071 OP251034 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.mangrovei MFLU 18-0559T NG_068299 NR_166288 N/A MN077053 Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.mangrovei MFLU 18-0575 MN017881 MN047117 N/A MN077054 Dayarathne et al. (2020b)
H.medogense FCATAS 4061T ON075431 ON075425 ON093249 ON093243 Song et al. (2022)
H.medogense FCATAS4320 ON075432 ON075426 ON093250 ON093244 Song et al. (2022)
H.munkii MUCL 53315 ON954153 KC968912 OP251035 KC977294 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
H.munkii YMJ 90080403 N/A JN979436 N/A AY951738 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.musceum MUCL 53765 KY610488 KC968926 KY624306 KC977280 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.notatum YMJ 250 N/A JQ009305 N/A AY951739 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.ochraceum MUCL 54625T N/A NR_155158 KY624271 KC977300 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.olivaceopigmentum DSM: 107924T MK287542 MK287530 MK287555 MK287568 Sir et al. (2019)
H.perforatum CBS115281 KY610455 KY610391 KY624224 KX271250 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.petriniae CBS 114746T KY610491 NR_155185 KY624279 KX271274 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.pilgerianum YMJ 92042505 N/A JQ009310 N/A AY951744 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.polyporoideum YMJ 15 N/A JQ009311 N/A AY951747 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.polyporoideum YMJ 56 N/A JQ009312 N/A AY951748 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.porphyreum CBS 119022 KY610456 KC968921 KY624225 KC977264 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.pseudofuscum DSM 112038T MW367849 NR_172359 MW373859 MW373868 Lambert et al. (2021)
H.pulicicidum CBS 122622T NG_066188 JX183076 KY624280 JX183074 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.rickii MUCL 53309T KY610416 KC968932 KY624281 KC977288 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.rickii YMJ 25 N/A JQ009313 N/A AY951750 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.rubiginosum MUCL 52887T KY610469 KC477232 KY624266 KY624311 Stadler et al. (2013); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.rubiginosum 423 MT214993 MT214998 MT212236 MT212240 Pourmoghaddam et al. (2020)
H.rutilum YMJ 181 N/A N/A N/A AY951752 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.samuelsii MUCL 51843T KY610466 KC968916 KY624269 KC977286 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.spegazzianum STMA 14082T N/A KU604573 N/A KU604582 Sir et al. (2016)
H.sporistriatatunicum UCH9542T N/A MN056426 N/A MK908140 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2020)
H.subgilvum STMA 24034 PP729637 PP718985 PP732078 PP721317 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2024)
H.sublenormandii JF13026T N/A KM610291 N/A KM610303 Kuhnert et al. (2015)
H.subrutiloides F202416 N/A FJ185304 N/A FJ185281 Platas et al. (2009)
H.cf.subticinense MUCL 53752 ON954152 KC968913 N/A KC977297 Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
H.szostakii BRIP 72527bT NG_149115 NR_182620 N/A N/A Tan and Shivas (2022a)
H.texense DSM 107933T MK287548 MK287536 MK287561 MK287574 Sir et al. (2019)
H.texense DSM 107928 MK287538 MK287527 MK287551 MK287564 Sir et al. (2019)
H.thailandicum MFLUCC 25-0024T PV468231 PQ164172 PV476728 PV469696 This study
H.thailandicum MFLU 24-0530 PV468232 PV469663 N/A PV469697 This study
H.ticinense CBS 115271 KY610471 JQ009317 KY624272 AY951757 Hsieh et al. (2005); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.ticinense CNF 2/11314 OQ865219 OQ869783 OQ877110 OQ877121 Pošta et al. (2023)
H.trugodes MUCL 54794T NG_066380 KF234422 KY624282 KF300548 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
H.ulmophilum YMJ 350 N/A JQ009320 N/A AY951760 Hsieh et al. (2005)
H.vogesiacum CBS 115273 KY610417 KC968920 KY624283 KX271275 Wendt et al. (2018)
H.wujianggense GMBC0213T MT568853 MT568854 MT585802 MT572481 Pi et al. (2020)
H.wuzhishanense FCATAS2708T OL615104 OL467292 OL584220 OL584227 Ma et al. (2022a)
H.zangii FCATAS 4029T ON075429 ON075423 ON093247 ON093241 Song et al. (2022)
H.zangii FCATAS 4319 ON075424 ON075424 ON093248 ON093242 Song et al. (2022)
H.zhaotongensis GMBCC1168T OP598100 OP597690 OP615662 OP615660 Zhang et al. (2023a)
H.zhaotongensis GMBCC1157 OP598101 OP597691 OP615663 OP615661 Zhang et al. (2023a)
Jackrogersellacohaerens CBS 119126 KY610396 KY610497 KY624270 KY624314 Wendt et al. (2018)
J.multiformis CBS 119016T KY610473 KC477234 KY624290 KX271262 Kuhnert et al. (2014b); Wendt et al. (2018)
Kretzschmariadeusta CBS 826.72 KU683767 KU684190 U’Ren et al. (2016)
Kretzschmariellaculmorum JDR 88 KX430043 KX430045 KX430046 Hsieh et al. (2005)
Monosporascuscannonballus ZJUP0990-2 OR357656 OR365762 Jin et al. (2024)
M.cannonballus ATCC 26931T NR_111370 N/A Schoch et al. (2014)
Natonodosaspeciosa CLM-RV86 N/A MF380435 MH745150 N/A Heredia et al. (2020)
Neoeutypellabaoshanensis HKAS 133108 PP584738 PP982310 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
N.baoshanensis HKAS 133107 PP584739 PP982311 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
Paraeutypellacitricola HKAS 133112 PP584747 PP951424 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
P.citricola HKAS 133113 PP584749 PP951426 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
P.citricola HKAS 133114 PP584748 PP951425 Dissanayake et al. (2024)
P.citricola MFLUCC 24-0614 PV426438 PV387964 This study
P.karsti GZAAS 20-4001T OR225064 OR189507 Zhang et al. (2023b)
P.longiasca GZAAS 19-1765T OR225065 OR189505 Zhang et al. (2023b)
P.subguizhouensis GMB0420T NR_198359 OP938748 Li et al. (2023)
P.subguizhouensis GMB0421 OP935187 OP938749 Li et al. (2023)
P.vitis UCD2291AR HQ288224 HQ288303 Urbez-Torres et al. (2012)
P.vitis UCD2428TX FJ790851 GU294726 Urbez-Torres et al. (2012)
Parahypoxylonpapillatum ATCC 58729T KY610454 NR_155153 KY624223 N/A Kuhnert et al. (2014a)
P.ruwenzoriense MUCL51392T NG_243121 NR_191199 OP251039 ON813078 Cedeño-Sanchez et al. (2023)
Pedumisporarhizophorae BCC44877 KJ888853 N/A Klaysuban et al. (2014)
P.rhizophorae BCC44878 KJ888854 N/A Klaysuban et al. (2014)
Peroneutypaalsophila EL58C AJ302467 N/A Acero et al. (2004)
P.curvispora HUEFS 136877 KM396641 N/A de Almeida et al. (2016)
P.diminutiasca MFLUCC 17-2144T MG873479 MH316765 Shang et al. (2018)
P.kunmingensis HKAS 113189T MZ475070 MZ490589 Hyde et al. (2020a)
P.longiasca MFLU 17-1217T NR_154386 MG334558 Senwanna et al. (2017)
P.mackenziei MFLUCC 16-0072T NR_154363 KY706363 Shang et al. (2017)
P.rubiformis MFLU 17-1185T NR_158867 MH316763 Shang et al. (2018)
Pseudodiatrypehainanensis GMB 0054T NR_174076 MW814883 Long et al. (2021)
P.hainanensis GMB 0055 MW797112 MW814884 Long et al. (2021)
Pyrenopolyporushunteri MUCL 52673 KY610472 KY610421 N/A N/A Wendt et al. (2018)
P.laminosus TBRC:8871 MH938536 MH938527 MK165424 MK165415 Wongkanoun et al. (2019)
P.nicaraguensis CBS 117739 KY610489 AM749922 KY624307 KC977272 Kuhnert et al. (2014a); Wendt et al. (2018)
Quaternariaquaternata MFLU:15-2605 MT185553 N/A Li et al. (2020)
Q.quaternata GNF13 KR605645 KY352464 Mehrabi et al. (2016)
Rhopalostromaangolense CBS 126414 MH875559 MH864100 KY624228 KX271277 Wendt et al. (2018); Vu et al. (2019)
Rostrohypoxylonterebratum CBS 119137T NG_057759 NR_137677 DQ631954 DQ840097 Fournier et al. (2010b)
Ruwenzoriapseudoannulata MUCL 51394 KY610494 NR_137733 KY624286 KX271278 Stadler et al. (2010a)
Stilbohypoxylonchiangraiense MFLUCC 24-0611T PQ165948 PV469698 PV476729 This study
S.chiangraiense MFLU 24-0529 PV469662 N/A PV476730 This study
S.elaeidicola GMB0763 PP153399 N/A PP209120 Li et al. (2024)
S.elaeicola JDR 173 EF026148 GQ844826 EF025616 Hsieh et al. (2010)
S.elaeicola HAST 94082615 GU322440 GQ844827 GQ495933 Hsieh et al. (2010)
S.elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0295a MT496745 MT502416 MT502420 Konta et al. (2020a)
S.elaeidis MFLUCC 15-0295b MT496746 MT502417 MT502421 Konta et al. (2020a)
S.quisquiliarum JDR 172 EF026119 GQ853020 EF025605 Hsieh et al. (2010)
Thamnomycesdendroidea CBS 123578T KY610467 NR_154472 KY624232 KY624313 Stadler et al. (2010b)
Vasilyevacinnamomi GMB0418T OP935174 OP938737 Li et al. (2023)
V.cinnamomi GMB0419 OP935175 OP938738 Li et al. (2023)
Xylariaacuminatilongissima HAST 623T NR_147516 GQ853028 GQ502711 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.adscendens HAST 570 GU300101 GQ844817 GQ487708 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.aethiopica YMJ 1136T MH790445 MH785222 MH785221 Fournier et al. (2018)
X.allantoidea HAST 94042903 GU324743 GQ848356 GQ502692 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.apoda HAST 90080804 GU322437 GQ844823 GQ495930 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.arbuscula CBS 126415 MH875560 MH864101 KY624287 KX271257 Vu et al. (2019)
X.arbuscula HAST 89041211 GU300090 GQ844805 GQ478226 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.arbusculavar.plenofissura HAST 93082814 GU339495 GQ844804 GQ478225 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.atrodivaricata HAST 95052001T EU178739 GQ853030 GQ502713 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.badia HAST 95070101 GU322446 GQ844833 GQ495939 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.bambusicola JDR 162 GU300088 GQ844801 GQ478223 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.berteri JDR 256 GU324750 GQ848363 GQ502698 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.brunneovinosa HAST 720T NR_153201 GQ853023 GQ502706 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.castorea PDD 600 GU324751 GQ853018 GQ502703 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.cf.glebulosa HAST 431 GU322462 GQ848345 GQ495956 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.cirrata HAST 664T EU179863 GQ853024 GQ502707 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.coccophora HAST 786 GU300093 GQ844809 GQ487701 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.crozonensis HAST 398 GU324748 GQ848361 GQ502697 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.cubensis HAST 477 N/A GQ848364 GQ502699 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.culleniae JDR 189 GU322442 GQ844829 GQ495935 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.escharoidea HAST 658T EU179864 GQ853026 GQ502709 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.fabacearum MFLUCC 16-0456 T NR_171104 MT212202 MT212220 Perera et al. (2020)
X.fabaceicola MFLUCC 16-0461T NR_171103 MT212201 MT212219 Perera et al. (2020)
X.feejeensis HAST 92092013 GU322454 GQ848336 GQ495947 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.fimbriata HAST 491 GU324753 GQ853022 GQ502705 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.glebulosa GMB1053 PP153391 PP198097 PP209117 Li et al. (2024)
X.grammica HAST 479 GU300097 GQ844813 GQ487704 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.griseosepiacea HAST 641T EU179865 GQ853031 GQ502714 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.hypoxylon CBS 122620T KY610407 KY624231 KX271279 Wendt et al. (2018)
X.hypoxylon HAST 152 GU300096 GQ844812 GQ260187 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.ianthinovelutina HAST 553 GU322441 GQ844828 GQ495934 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.intraflava HAST 725T EU179866 GQ853035 GQ502718 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.juruensis HAST 92042501 GU322439 GQ844825 GQ495932 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.laevis HAST 419 GU324746 GQ848359 GQ502695 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.laevis HAST 95072910 GU324747 GQ848360 GQ502696 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.liquidambaris HAST 93090701 GU300094 GQ844810 GQ487702 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.longissima GMB1076 PP146609 PP198095 PP209118 Li et al. (2024)
X.multiplex JDR 259 GU300099 GQ844815 GQ487706 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.nigripes HAST 653 GU324755 GQ853027 GQ502710 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.oxyacanthae JDR 859 GU322434 GQ844820 GQ495927 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.oxyacanthae YMJ 1320 MF773431 MF773435 MF773439 Ju et al. (2018)
X.palmicola PDD 604 GU322436 GQ844822 GQ495929 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.phyllocharis HAST 528 GU322445 GQ844832 GQ495938 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.plebeja HAST 91122401 GU324740 GQ848353 GQ502689 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.polymorpha JDR 1012 GU322460 GQ848343 GQ495954 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.reevesiae HAST 90071609 GU322435 GQ844821 GQ495928 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.regalis HAST 920 GU324745 GQ848358 GQ502694 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.rogersii FCATAS 915T NR_184943 MZ707121 N/A Ma et al. (2022b)
X.schimicola FCATAS 896T NR_184945 MZ707114 MZ695787 Ma et al. (2022b)
X.schweinitzii HAST 92092023 GU322463 GQ848346 GQ495957 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.striata HAST 304 GU300089 GQ844803 GQ478224 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.theaceicola FCATAS 903T NR_184944 MZ707115 MZ695788 Ma et al. (2022b)
X.venosula HAST 94080508 EF026149 GQ844806 EF025617 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.venustula HAST 88113002 GU300091 GQ844807 GQ487699 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.vivantii HAST 519 GU322438 GQ844824 GQ495931 Hsieh et al. (2010)
X.wallichii FCATAS 923 MZ648861 MZ707118 MZ695793 Ma et al. (2022b)
X.xylarioides CBS 127883 KP218909 N/A N/A Vu et al. (2019)
Xylotumulusgibbisporus ATCC MYA-4109T NR_119711 N/A N/A Schoch et al. (2014)

N/A- Sequences not available; “–” - Sequences not used for analyses.

Phylogenetic analyses

The quality of the sequence chromatograms was checked using BioEdit v. 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999). Forward and reverse sequences were assembled into consensus sequences using Lasergene SeqMan Pro v. 7. Newly generated sequences were searched using the BLASTn search engine at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) against the GenBank database, and related literature was referred to (Thiyagaraja et al. 2019; Karimi et al. 2023). Each locus (LSU, ITS, β-tub, and rpb2) was individually aligned using MAFFT 6.864b (Katoh et al. 2019), trimmed using trimAl v. 1.2 software (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009), and manually adjusted for improvement where necessary using BioEdit v. 7.2 (Hall 1999). Single gene alignments and the concatenated aligned dataset were analyzed separately using ML and BI. Best-fit models for BI analyses were selected using MrModeltest v. 2.2 (Nylander 2004) under the AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) implemented in PAUP v. 4.0b10. The GTR+G model was selected as the best model for BI analyses for all gene regions.

The ML analyses were performed using IQ-TREE with bootstrap support obtained from 1,000 pseudoreplicates (Nguyen et al. 2015; Chernomor et al. 2016). The BI analyses were conducted with MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm of six chains was initiated for 1,000,000 generations. The trees were sampled at every 100th generation, resulting in 10,000 trees. The first 10% of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase, while the remaining 90% were used to calculate the posterior probabilities (PP) in the majority rule consensus tree. Phylograms were visualized in the FigTree v. 1.4.0 program (Rambaut 2012) and reorganized in Microsoft PowerPoint (2010).

Preliminary screening for antibacterial activity

Preliminary screening for antibacterial activity was conducted for new isolates from the present study, along with selected existing Xylariales cultures from the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), following the methods described by Mapook et al. (2020). Ampicillin antibacterial discs were used as a positive control for the screening tests (Alam et al. 2019). The agar plug diffusion method was employed to assess antibacterial activity against Bacillussubtilis (gram-positive bacteria) and Escherichiacoli (gram-negative bacteria) (Balouiri et al. 2016). Both bacterial strains were cultured on nutrient agar (NA) for 24 hours. Prior to inoculating the Mueller-Hinton agar medium, bacterial cell concentrations were determined using a hemocytometer (6.7 × 105 cells/mL), as described by Mapook et al. (2020). Fungal mycelial plugs from the test samples were transferred onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates and incubated at room temperature (25 °C) for 24 hours. Inhibition zones were measured and compared with both the positive and negative controls.

Chemical extraction and HPLC/Q-TOF analyses

Xylariales cultures that showed positive results in the antibacterial activity assay were selected for fermentation and crude extraction. Culture conditions for the selected fungi were optimized using potato dextrose broth (PDB; potatoes, infusion from 200 g/L; dextrose, 20 g/L; pH 5.1 ± 0.2), yeast malt broth (YMB; dextrose, 10 g/L; malt extract, 3 g/L; peptic digest of animal tissue, 5 g/L; yeast extract, 3 g/L; pH 6.2 ± 0.2), and malt extract broth (MEB; malt extract, 30 g/L; mycological peptone, 5 g/L; agar, 15 g/L; pH 5.4 ± 0.2). Five mycelial plugs were cut from freshly grown cultures on each of the three media using a sterilized cork borer. These plugs were inoculated into 250 mL of the respective liquid medium in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The flasks were incubated on an Innova rotary shaker 43/43R (Eppendorf, Germany) at 140 rpm at 23 °C for 3–5 days. During fermentation, glucose depletion was monitored daily using Bayer Harnzuckerstreifen glucose test strips (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), and pH levels were measured using litmus paper (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). When glucose levels reached zero and the pH dropped below 7.0, the cultures were processed for extraction.

Fungal mycelium and supernatant were separated by vacuum filtration. Crude extracts were prepared from both fractions. For the supernatant, ethyl acetate extraction was performed three times by mixing it with an equal volume of ethyl acetate in a separatory funnel. An equal volume of acetone was added to the mycelium, which was then freeze-dried and extracted three times with methanol (MeOH) at 40 °C in an ultrasonic bath for 30 minutes (Hellwig et al. 2005). After centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 minutes, the supernatants were evaporated, and 50–100 mL of deionized water was added. Ethyl acetate extraction was then performed three times on the mycelium using an equal volume of ethyl acetate to yield a crude extract. These extracts were weighed.

Crude extracts obtained from both supernatant and mycelium were dissolved in methanol to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. The solutions were filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane filter to remove particulates prior to HPLC injection. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted using a Waters ACQUITY Arc System. Detection was performed with a photodiode array (PDA) detector and a fluorescence (FLR) detector (Waters, USA) using a reverse-phase C18 column (Kinetex® 5 µm EVO C18 100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm LC) maintained at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.2% formic acid (A) and methanol (B). Elution was carried out at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min using the following linear gradient: 5–30% B (0–8 min), 30% B (8–10 min), 30–95% B (10–18 min), 95% B (18–22 min), 95–5% B (22–25 min), and 5% B (25–32 min). Samples were analyzed using a photodiode array detector set at 256 and 425 nm. Data analysis was conducted using Empower 3 software.

Liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) was performed using an Agilent II/G6545B QTOF/MS and 1290 Infinity system equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The instrument was operated in both positive and negative ionization modes under UHPLC pressure (1,300) and a mass range of 100–10,000.

Results

. Astrocystis

Berk. & Broome, J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 14(no. 74): 123 (1873) [1875]

E52E5287-8EFF-559F-8D79-FC67E4A3E461

Index Fungorum: IF439

Facesoffungi Number: FoF00420

Notes.

Berkeley and Broome (1875) introduced Astrocystis, with A.mirabilis as the type species. Morphologically, this genus is characterized by uni- or occasionally multi-peritheciate stromata development, often beneath the host cuticle or on the surface; relatively short stipe asci; and ascus apical apparatus that are relatively small, amyloid, and stopper-shaped (Smith et al. 2003). Currently, 42 records are available in the Index Fungorum (2025).

Phylogenetic analyses for Astrocystis

For Astrocystis, 32 taxa were included in the combined data set (ITS, β-tub, and rpb2) with Xylotumulusgibbisporus (ATCC MYA-4109), Xylariaglebulosa (GMB1053), and X.schweinitzii (HAST 92092023) as outgroup taxa. The final alignment consisted of 1953 characters, including gaps (ITS = 435 bp, β-tub = 514 bp, and rpb2 = 1004 bp). Both ML and BI analyses exhibit similar tree topology. The best-scoring RAxML tree was obtained (Fig. 1), with a final likelihood value of -12708.0675. The matrix included 851 distinct alignment patterns, with 17.88% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.242776, C = 0.267065, G = 0.262377, and T = 0.227782; substitution rates were AC = 1.393798, AG = 4.050932, AT = 1.300292, CG = 1.282338, CT = 7.225689, and GT = 1.0; and the gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.297082. In the BI analyses, the average standard deviation of the split frequencies was 0.006 after 1,000,000 generations of runs. The phylogenetic tree topology is similar to the previous study by Li et al. (2024). According to the phylogenetic analyses, our strain MFLUCC 25-0022 clades within Astrocystis, with Astrocystisbambusae strains (HAST 8902190 and GMB0700).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, β-tub, and rpb2. The tree is rooted to Xylotumulusgibbisporus (ATCC MYA-4109), Xylariaglebulosa (GMB1053), and X.schweinitzii (HAST 92092023). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the node. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.

Taxonomy

. Astrocystis bambusae

(Henn.) Læssøe & Spooner, Kew Bull. 49(1): 13 (1994) [1993]

5B8DF55F-6917-52A6-9668-B5754B8EF78E

Index Fungorum: IF361739

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17292

Fig. 2

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Astrocystisbambusae on a dead twig of Bambusavulgaris (MFLU 24-0522, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g–j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (stained in Melzer’s reagent); l–q. Ascospores; r. Ascospores with sheath; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (f–j); 10 μm (e, k–r).

  • Rosellinia bambusae Henn. 1908. Basionym.

Description.

Saprobic on dead culms of Bambusavulgaris. Sexual morph: Stromata 1.2–0.9 mm diam., 0.8–1 mm high, scattered, solitary, superficial, black, appear as black raised spots on the host surface, hexagonal prism-shaped, containing one ascoma, with a circle of black tissue at the bottom. Perithecia 0.5–0.7 mm diam., 0.4–0.5 mm high, comprising black, fragile, carbonaceous tissue. Peridium 15–45 μm wide, 5–8 layers, brown to dark brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium comprising 2–8 μm wide, oblong to cylindrical, septate, unbranched, cellular, paraphyses. Asci 55–90 × 5–6.5 µm (x̄ = 75 × 6.2 µm, n = 30), 8- or 6-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, persistent, apically rounded, with amyloid, cuboid, apical apparatus, staining blue in Melzer’s reagent, 2–3 µm high × 1.4–2.44 μm wide (x̄ = 2.6 × 1.9 μm). Ascospores 10–13.5 × 4–6 µm (x̄ = 12 × 5 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, unicellular, hyaline when immature, dark brown at maturity, aseptate, equilateral ellipsoid, with rounded ends, smooth, guttulate, with a straight germ slit nearly full-length, surrounded by a sheath. Asexual morph: undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on PDA reaching 2–2.5 cm diam. after 5 days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, slightly thinning towards the edge, white color in the front view, and light brown in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Mae Chan, Mae Chan District, on dead culms of Bambusavulgaris (Poaceae), 18 March 2024, Hsan Win (MFLU 24-0522), living culture MFLUCC 25-0022.

Known distribution and hosts.

China, India, Thailand (Bambusa sp.); Ghana (Oxytenantheraabyssinica); Philippines (Bambusa sp., Schizostachyum sp.) (Læssøe and Spooner 1993; Li et al. 2024); Thailand (Bambusavulgaris) (this study).

Notes.

Morphologically, our collection (MFLUCC 25-0022) exhibits characteristics similar to the holotype of A.bambusae (basionym: Roselliniabambusae) (Merrill 5030) and other isolates of A.bambusae (GMB0700). These similarities include scattered, solitary, superficial, black stromata containing one ascomata, with a circle of black tissue at the bottom and unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, with an apical apparatus that stains blue in Melzer’s reagent (Li et al. 2024). The ascospores have a straight germ slit nearly full-length and are surrounded by a sheath (Ju and Rogers 1990; Li et al. 2024). However, the asci and ascospores in our collection (MFLUCC 25-0022, 55–90 μm and 10–13.5 μm, respectively) are smaller than the holotype (100–130 μm and 10.5–15(–16) μm) (Ju and Rogers 1990). Based on multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 25-0022) clustered with other authentic strains (HAST 89021904 and GMB0700) in a well-supported clade (89% ML, 0.95 BYPP) (Fig. 1). Astrocystisbambusae has previously been recorded on Bambusa sp. in China, India, the Philippines, and Thailand (Ju and Rogers 1990; Læssøe and Spooner 1993; Li et al. 2024). In our study, we reported a new host record for A.bambusae on Bambusavulgaris.

. Annulohypoxylon

Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers & H.M. Hsieh, Mycologia 97(4): 855 (2005)

806C1BA3-7232-544D-A1F9-660E6FD1ED71

Index Fungorum: IF500298

Facesoffungi Number: FoF02983

Notes.

Annulohypoxylon was introduced with A.truncatum as the type species (Hsieh et al. 2005). Kuhnert et al. (2017) conducted a concise revision of this genus based on molecular phylogeny and chemotaxonomic data, resulting in the identification of several additional species, such as A.massivum, A.violaceopigmentum, A.viridistratum, and A.yungensis. Annulohypoxylon is characterized by effused-pulvinate or pulvinate, glomerate stromata, waxy or carbonaceous tissue immediately beneath the surface and between perithecia, spherical, obovoid, with a carbonaceous stromata layer surrounding individual perithecia. Asci are light- to dark-colored, 8-spored, cylindrical, stipitate, persistent, with discoid apical ring, amyloid or infrequently inamyloid, while ascospores are light- to dark-colored, ellipsoid or short fusoid, inequilateral, narrowly rounded, or with broadly rounded ends, with a germ slit, perispore dehiscent or indehiscent in 10% KOH (Li et al. 2016). Annulohypoxylon species have mainly been recorded in tropical and subtropical regions as saprobes associated with dead dicotyledonous wood and as endophytes in seed plants (Kuhnert et al. 2017). Hyde et al. (2024) listed 60 species under this genus, while 73 species are included in the Index Fungorum (2025).

Phylogenetic analyses for Annulohypoxylon

Forty-six taxa of Annulohypoxylon were included in the combined data set (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2) with Biscogniauxiapetrensis (HKAS102388) as the outgroup taxon. After alignment, the dataset comprised 2832 characters, including gaps (ITS = 585 bp, LSU = 850 bp, β-tub = 380 bp, rpb2 = 1017 bp). The tree topology of the BI analysis (not shown) was similar to the ML tree. The best-scoring RAxML tree was obtained (Fig. 3), with a final likelihood value of -19758.666775. The matrix had 1149 distinct alignment patterns with 46.81% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.248997, C = 0.254092, G = 0.262808, T = 0.234103; substitution rates AC = 1.551284, AG = 4.096946, AT = 1.717695, CG = 1.101636, CT = 7.150044, GT = 1.0; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.220052. In BI analyses, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.008 after 3,000,000 generations of runs. The phylogenetic tree topology is similar to that by Kuhnert et al. (2017). Our strains (MFLUCC 24-0606, MFLUCC 24-0607, MFLUCC 24-0608, MFLUCC 24-0609, MFLUCC 24-0610, and MFLUCC 25-0023) cluster within Annulohypoxylon.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2. The tree is rooted to Biscogniauxiapetrensis (HKAS102388). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.

Taxonomy

. Annulohypoxylon bahnphadengense

J. Fourn. & M. Stadler, Fungal Diversity 40: 30 (2010)

F08BA9AC-8591-5E4C-AF60-0F9CCAF2F19E

Index Fungorum: IF512545

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17293

Fig. 4

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Annulohypoxylonbahnphadengense on dead wood of Berryacordifolia (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d, e. Horizontal section through ascomata (arrow shows the ostiolar disc); f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h–m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; o–q. Ascospores; r. Germinated ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f, g, i–m); 10 μm (h, r); 5 μm (n–q).

Description.

Saprobic on the dead wood of Berryacordifolia. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 3–14 × 2–10 × 0.5–0.2 mm (x̄ = 7 × 6 × 0.3 mm, n = 8), effused-applanate, superficial, pulvinate to hemispherical, clustered, hard-textured, shiny, surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata 0.5–3.5 mm high × 0.3–0.5 mm diam. (x̄ = 2 × 0.4 mm, n = 15), immersed in the stroma, subglobose to globose, black, ostiolate, papillate, encircled with a flattened truncatum-type disc 0.2–0.25 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.22 mm, n = 10). Peridium 40–60 μm wide, composed of several layers of hyaline to dark brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium 4–6 μm wide, comprising long, hyaline, unbranched, septate paraphyses. Asci 54–130 × 3–5 μm (x̄ = 94 × 4.5 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with an apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent. Ascospores 6–8 × 3–4 μm (x̄ = 7.5 × 3.5 μm, n = 40), uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline when immature, becoming light brown to dark brown at maturity, guttulate. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 2.0–2.5 cm diam. after six days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, white color in the front view, brown in the middle, and pale brown at the margin in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Phan District, Sai Khao, forest area near Wat Udom Waree, on decaying wood of Berryacordifolia (Malvaceae), 05 July 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA28 (MFLU 24-0526); living culture MFLUCC 24-0608.

Known distribution and hosts.

China (decaying wood) (Ke et al. 2024); Thailand (dead bark or wood, Berryacordifolia) (Fournier et al. 2010b; this study).

Notes.

Morphologically, our collection (MFLUCC 24-0608) shows similar characteristics to the holotype of A.bahnphadengense (MFU08-1552), including shiny, black, carbonaceous ascostromata; 8-spored, cylindrical, short-pedicellate asci with an apical ring bluing in Melzer’s reagent; and uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, ascospores with narrowly rounded ends (Fournier et al. 2010b). According to the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 24-0608) clusters with the ex-type strain of A.bahnphadengense (STMA 13115) with 89% ML bootstrap and 0.84 PP support (Fig. 3). Based on the morpho-molecular evidence, we identified our collection as a new host record of A.bahnphadengense on Berryacordifolia in Thailand.

. Annulohypoxylon chiangraiense

Rathnayaka, K.D. Hyde & Chethana sp. nov.

187AE288-FC89-5D75-875E-1B77BCD88780

Index Fungorum number: IF903883

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17288

Fig. 5

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense on a dead branch of Tamarindusindica (MFLU 24-0524, Holotype). a. Sustrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g–j. Asci; k. Ascal apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); l–o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 μm (d); 20 μm (e–k); 10 μm (l–o).

Etymology.

The epithet chiangraiense refers to Chiang Rai Province, where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU 24-0524.

Description.

Saprobic on the dead branch of Tamarindusindica. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 0.4–0.6 × 0.8–1.5 mm (x̄ = 0.5 × 1.2 mm, n = 10), semi-immersed to superficial, with the base immersed, pulvinate to hemispherical, solitary or clustered, spherical surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata immersed in stroma, globose to subglobose, black. Peridium 18–30 μm wide, composed of several layers of hyaline to dark brown cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses 3–6 μm wide, hyaline, abundant, persistent, unbranched, septate. Asci 90–145 × 8–5 μm (x̄ = 124 × 7 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with an apical ring not bluing in the Melzer’s reagent (without KOH pretreatment). Ascospores 10–12 × 4–7 μm (x̄ = 11 × 5 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline at immature stages, dark brown when mature, guttulate. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 1.0–2.0 cm diam. after five days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, slightly thinning towards the edge, with white color in the middle and pale yellow color in the margin of the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • near Nang Lae waterfall, Chiang Rai, on decaying wood of Tamarindusindica (Fabaceae), 18 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA11 (MFLU 24-0524, holotype); ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 24-0606.

Notes.

Annulohypoxylon is a speciose genus with more than 60 species; however, the present study shows the genus to be more diverse as predicted by Bhunjun et al. (2024). Based on the multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) formed a distant lineage sister to A.archeri (SGNLB 5) and A.microdiscum (HMAS 285320) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 3). Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense fits within the generic concept of Annulohypoxylon by having spherical, carbonaceous ascostromata; 8-spored, cylindrical asci; and ellipsoid, light- to dark-brown ascospores (Li et al. 2016). Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense differs from both A.archeri and A.microdiscum by having smaller ascostromata (0.4–0.6 × 0.8–1.5 mm vs. 8–20 × 5–10 mm and 0.5–4 × 0.3–2 cm) (Raei et al. 2012; Cruz et al. 2020). The asci of A.chiangraiense are shorter and wider (90–145 × 8–5 μm) than A.microdiscum (130–187 × 5–6.5 μm). However, asci were not observed in A.archeri (Cruz et al. 2020). In A.chiangraiense, the apical ring does not turn blue in Melzer’s iodine reagent, whereas in A.microdiscum, the apical ring turns blue in Melzer’s iodine reagent (Raei et al. 2012). While ascospores of both A.archeri and A.microdiscum have a straight germ slit, such a character was not observed in the ascospores of A.chiangraiense (Raei et al. 2012; Cruz et al. 2020). When comparing the ITS base pair differences of A.chiangraiense with A.archeri and A.microdiscum, it shows 1.6% (8/564) and 1.9% (10/533) differences (without gaps), respectively. Based on the distinct morphology and phylogenetic evidence, we established Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense as a new species.

. Annulohypoxylon crowfoothodgkiniae

Y.P. Tan, Bishop-Hurley, Bransgr. & R.G. Shivas, Index of Australian Fungi 1: 1 (2022)

3BF3D690-588C-50BE-8D58-39E4C3204566

Index Fungorum: IF900010

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17294

Fig. 6

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Annulohypoxyloncrowfoothodgkiniae on decaying wood of Swieteniamacrophylla (MFLU 24-0522, a new host and geographical record). a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the host; d. Cross section of the stroma; e. Paraphyses; f–j. Asci; k. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); l–q. Ascospores; r, s. Colony on PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e–k); 5 μm (l–q).

Description.

Saprobic on dead wood of Swieteniamacrophylla. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 0.5–0.7 × 0.3–0.6 mm (x̄ = 0.6 × 0.5 mm, n = 10), semi-immersed to superficial, with the base immersed, pulvinate to hemispherical, clustered, shiny, surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata immersed in the stroma, subglobose to hemispherical, black, ostiolate, papillate. Hamathecium 3–7 μm wide, comprising long, hyaline, unbranched, aseptate paraphyses. Asci 55–65 × 4–6 μm (x̄ = 60 × 4.5 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with an apical ring not bluing in the Melzer’s reagent. Ascospores 5–6 × 2–3 μm (x̄ = 5.4 × 2.8 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, one-celled, ellipsoidal inequilaterally, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline when immature, becoming brown at maturity. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 2.0–2.5 cm diam. after five days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, slightly thinning towards the edge, white color in the front view, and light brown in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Nang Lae Village, Chiang Rai, on decaying wood of Swieteniamacrophylla (Meliaceae), 21 May 2024, Zaw Lin Tun, AZ2 (MFLU 24-0523); living culture MFLUCC 25-0023.

Known distribution and hosts.

Australia (Pandanustectorius) (Tan and Shivas 2022a); Thailand (Swieteniamacrophylla) (this study).

Notes.

In the multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 25-0023) and the ex-type strain of A.crowfoothodgkiniae (BRIP 72527 h) clustered with 91% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 3). When comparing the base pair differences between our strain (MFLUCC 25-0023) and the ex-type strain of A.crowfoothodgkiniae (BRIP 72527 h), the ITS shows a 0.3% (3/894) difference, and there are no differences in LSU. The morphology of the holotype is not recorded. Therefore, we could not compare the morphology between the holotype and our strain. In here, we provide complete morphology with an illustration for A.crowfoothodgkiniae. Based on molecular evidence, we introduce our collection as a new host record of A.crowfoothodgkiniae from Swieteniamacrophylla and also as a new geographical record from Thailand.

. Annulohypoxylon spougei

Suwannasai, M.P. Martín, Phosri & Whalley, Persoonia 44: 353 (2020)

5CC6F3EF-0165-5012-B3A7-96BFD7DB8A69

Index Fungorum: IF811164

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17295

Fig. 7

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Annulohypoxylonspougei on dead wood of Antidesmamadagascariense (MFLU 24-0526, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through the ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g-i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k-p. Ascospores; q. Germinated ascospores; r, s. Colony on the PDA (r upper, s lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f); 10 μm (g–i, q); 5 μm (j–p).

Description.

Saprobic on Antidesmamadagascariense dead wood. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 1–3 cm long × 0.3–2 cm broad and 0.8–1.2 mm thick (x̄ = 2 × 1.4 × 1 mm, n = 10), hemispherical, effused-pulvinate, shiny, surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata 0.25–0.6 mm high × 0.25–0.5 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.4 × 0.3 mm, n = 10), immersed in the stroma, subglobose to globose, black, ostioles papillate, encircled with a flattened, truncatum-type disc, 0.2–0.25 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.23 mm, n = 8). Hamathecium 3–5 μm wide, comprising long, hyaline, unbranched, septate paraphyses. Asci 27–42 × 2–3 μm (x̄ = 36 × 2 μm, n = 20), the spore-bearing parts 17–25 µm long with stipes 9–15 µm long, 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with an apical ring bluing in Melzer’s iodine reagent. Ascospores 7–9 × 3–4 μm (x̄ = 7.6 × 3.6 μm, n = 40), uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline when immature, becoming brown at maturity, guttulate. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 1.5–2.0 cm diam. after five days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, white color in the front view, brown in the middle, and pale brown at the margin of the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, near Ang Kep Nam Huai Luang Than Thong Reservoir, on decaying wood of Antidesmamadagascariense (Phyllanthaceae), 05 July 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA24 (MFLU 24-0525); living culture MFLUCC 24-0607.

Known distribution and hosts.

China (rotten wood) (Ke et al. 2024); Thailand (on corticated wood, Antidesmamadagascariense) (Crous et al. 2020; this study).

Notes.

According to the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 24-0607) clustered with the ex-type strain of A.spougei (SWUF09-032) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). Our fungal collection (MFLUCC 24-0607) exhibits morphological characteristics similar to the holotype of A.spougei (SWUFH099), including black, shiny carbonaceous ascostromata; 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical asci, with an apical ring that bluing in Melzer’s iodine reagent; and unicellular, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, brown ascospores (Crous et al. 2020). However, the ascospores of the A.spougei holotype show a straight germ slit along the full length of the spore, which is not observed in our isolate (MFLUCC 24-0607). Based on the morpho-molecular evidence, we identified our collection as a new host record of A.spougei on Antidesmamadagascariense in Thailand.

. Annulohypoxylon purpureonitens

(Y.M. Ju & J.D. Rogers) Y.M. Ju, J.D. Rogers & H.M. Hsieh, Mycologia 97(4): 861 (2005)

2147B750-CED2-549B-A177-6B263B9FD47B

Index Fungorum: IF500323

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17296

Fig. 8

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Annulohypoxylonpurpureonitens on the dead wood of Sterculiatragacantha (MFLU 24-0527, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d. Ostiolar discs in ascomata (indicated by arrows); e. Horizontal section through ascomata; f. Paraphyses; g–l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus (not staining in Melzer’s reagent); n–q. Ascospores (q: arrows indicate the germ slit); r Germinated ascospores; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 500 μm (c, d); 200 μm (e); 20 μm (f–l); 5 μm (m–r).

  • Hypoxylon purpureonitens Y.M. Ju & J.D. Rogers 1996. Basionym.

Description.

Saprobic on the dead wood of Sterculiatragacantha. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 2–10 mm long × 3–8 mm broad and 0.25–0.35 mm thick (x̄ = 7.5 × 5.5 × 0.3 mm, n = 10), hemispherical, effused-pulvinate, solitary or clustered, shiny, surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata 0.4–0.5 mm high × 0.3–0.4 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.45 × 0.35 mm, n = 15), immersed in the stroma, subglobose to globose, black, ostioles papillate, encircled with a flattened truncatum-type disc 0.18–0.25 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.2 mm, n = 10). Hamathecium 2.5–4.5 μm wide, comprising long, hyaline, unbranched, aseptate paraphyses. Asci 90–110 × 5–7 μm (x̄ = 100 × 6.2 μm, n = 20), the spore-bearing parts 60–70 µm long with stipes 20–40 µm long, 6-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with an apical ring not bluing in Melzer’s iodine reagent. Ascospores 7–9 × 3–6 μm (x̄ = 8.5 × 4.4 μm, n = 40), uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal, with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline when immature, becoming dark brown at maturity, guttules present at the immature stage, with straight, spore length germ slit. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 2–2.5 cm diam. after seven days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, white color in the front view, dark brown or black in the middle, and brown at the margin in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Phan District, Sai Khao, forest area near Wat Udom Waree, on decaying wood of Sterculiatragacantha (Malvaceae), 05 July 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA30 (MFLU 24-0527); living culture MFLUCC 24-0609.

Known distribution.

Brazil (on an unidentified branch of a dicotyledonous tree) (Pereira et al. 2009); Thailand (on rotten wood, Sterculiatragacantha) (Suwannasai et al. 2013; this study).

Notes.

According to the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 24-0609) clustered with the ex-type strain of A.purpureonitens (MFLUCC 14-1225) with 97% ML bootstrap and 0.84 PP support (Fig. 3). Our fungal collection (MFLUCC 24-0609) shows morphological characteristics similar to the holotype of A.purpureonitens (WSP 71615), including effused-pulvinate ascostromata and unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral, brown ascospores with a straight, spore-length germ slit (Pereira et al. 2009). In this study, we introduced our fungal collection as a new host record of A.purpureonitens on Sterculiatragacantha in Thailand.

. Annulohypoxylon violaceopigmentum

Sir & Kuhnert, Fungal Diversity: 10.1007/s13225-016-0377-6, [9] (2016)

D28D608A-AFA8-5EC4-834A-57EDF81E1D20

Index Fungorum: IF552341

Facesoffungi Number: FoF02507

Fig. 9

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Annulohypoxylonviolaceopigmentum on the dead wood of Syzygiumpolyanthum (MFLU 24-0528, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascomata on the host (ostiolar discs indicated by the arrow); d. Horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f–k. Asci; l. Ascus apical apparatus (not stained in Melzer’s reagent); m–q. Ascospores (q: arrow indicates the germ slit); r A germinated ascospore; s, t Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e–k, r); 5 μm (l–q).

Description.

Saprobic on the dead wood of Syzygiumpolyanthum. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 8–15 mm long × 5–10 mm broad and 0.5–1.2 mm thick (x̄ = 12 × 5.5 × 0.8 mm, n = 10), hemispherical, effused-pulvinate, clustered, developing within cuticle, surface black, carbonaceous. Ascomata 0.4–0.5 mm high × 0.3–0.4 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.45 × 0.35 mm, n = 10), immersed in the stroma, subglobose to globose, black, ostioles papillate, encircled with a flattened truncatum-type disc 0.2–0.25 mm diam. (x̄ = 0.24 mm, n = 5). Hamathecium 1–2 μm wide, comprising long, hyaline, unbranched, aseptate paraphyses. Asci 74–110 × 5–7 μm (x̄ = 97 × 6.7 μm, n = 20), the spore-bearing parts 70–77 µm long with stipes 29–32 µm long, 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with an apical ring not bluing in Melzer’s iodine reagent. Ascospores 7–10 × 4–6 μm (x̄ = 8.7 × 4.6 μm, n = 40), uniseriate, one-celled, inequilaterally ellipsoidal with narrowly rounded ends, hyaline when immature, becoming dark brown at maturity, guttules at immature stage, with a spore length straight germ slit. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reaching 2–2.5 cm diam. after five days at 25 °C, circular in shape, white at first, cottony, white color in the front view, brown in the middle, and pale brown at the margin in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Phan District, Sai Khao, forest area near Wat Udom Waree, on decaying wood of Syzygiumpolyanthum (Myrtaceae), 05 July 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA31 (MFLU 24-0528); living culture MFLUCC 24-0610.

Known distribution and hosts.

Thailand (on dead wood, Syzygiumpolyanthum) (Kuhnert et al. 2017; this study).

Notes.

The morphological description of our collection (MFLUCC 24-0610) aligns with the holotype of A.violaceopigmentum (MFLU 14-0314), including effused-pulvinate ascostromata; black, ostioles, papillate ascomata encircled by a flattened truncatum-type disc; 8-spored, cylindrical asci; and brown, unicellular, inequilaterally ellipsoidal ascospores with broadly rounded ends and a straight germ slit along the spore length (Kuhnert et al. 2017). Based on the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS, LSU, β-tub, and rpb2), our strain (MFLUCC 24-0610) clusters with the ex-type strain of A.violaceopigmentum (MFLUCC 14-1225) with 97% ML bootstrap and 0.85 PP support (Fig. 3). Considering the morpho-molecular evidence, we conclude that our collection is a new host record of A.violaceopigmentum on Syzygiumpolyanthum in Thailand.

. Halorosellinia

Whalley, E.B.G. Jones, K.D. Hyde & Læssøe, Mycol. Res. 104(3): 368 (2000)

63FA1191-BB72-5099-A27F-5311F6CD8849

Index Fungorum: IF28368

Facesoffungi Number: FoF03045

Notes.

Halorosellinia was introduced by Whalley et al. (1999) as a monotypic genus to accommodate H.oceanica (previously referred to as Hypoxylonoceanicum). This genus is characterized by uniperitheciate ascomata immersed in a pseudostroma (Hyde et al. 2016). Halorosellinia currently comprises five species (Index Fungorum 2025). Only three Halorosellinia species are included in Wijayawardene et al. (2022), while five species are listed in the Index Fungorum (2025) and Hyde et al. (2024).

Phylogenetic analyses for Xylariaceae

For Xylariaceae, the ITS, rpb2, and β-tub gene regions were used in the combined data set. Seventy-two isolates of Xylariaceae species were included in the analysis, with Hypoxylonfragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264) as the outgroup taxa. After alignment, the dataset comprises 2747 characters, including gaps (ITS = 580 bp, rpb2 = 1122 bp, β-tub = 1045 bp). The topology of the BI tree was similar to that of the ML tree. The best-scoring RAxML tree, with a final likelihood value of -49702.0557, is shown in Fig. 10. The matrix comprises 1637 distinct alignment patterns, with 16.93% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.243971, C = 0.271335, G = 0.241282, and T = 0.243412; substitution rates were AC = 1.350468, AG = 5.371719, AT = 1.169242, CG = 1.195494, CT = 7.102768, and GT = 1.0; and the gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.335659. In the BI analysis, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.01 after 3,000,000 generations of runs. The phylogenetic tree topology is similar to the study by Konta et al. (2020a). According to the phylogenetic analyses, our strains (MFLU 24-0536 and MFLUCC 25-0025) cluster with Haloroselliniaxylocarpi (MFLU 18-0545) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support, while MFLUCC 24-0611 clusters sister to Stilbohypoxylonquisquiliarum (YMJ 172) with 90% ML bootstrap and 0.98 PP support (Fig. 10).

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, rpb2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Hypoxylonfragiforme (HAST 383 and MUCL 51264). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.

Taxonomy

. Halorosellinia xylocarpi

Dayar & K.D. Hyde, Mycosphere 11(1): 158 (2020)

D67773CC-30AE-5878-9C0F-DB4DD040DBEC

Index Fungorum number: IF556600

Facesoffungi Number: FoF06192

Fig. 11

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Haloroselliniaxylocarpi on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0536, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Appearance of an ascoma on the host; c. A horizontal section through an ascoma; d. Peridium; e. Paraphyses; f–k. Asci; l, m. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; n–s. Ascospores (r: arrow shows the germ slit on the ventral side); t A germinated ascospore; u, v Colony on the PDA (u upper, v lower). Scale bars: 100 μm (b, c); 20 μm (d–k); 10 μm (l–t).

Description.

Saprobic on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp. Sexual morph: Pseudostromata 0.6–1.0 × 0.5–0.8 mm (x̄ = 0.8 × 0.6 mm, n = 5), superficial, pulvinate to hemispherical, in clusters of uni-peritheciate pseudostromata, surface black, carbonaceous, lacking ascomatal projections. Ascomata 0.3–0.34 × 0.34–0.36 mm (x̄ = 0.33 × 0.35 mm, n = 5), superficial, globose or subglobose to hemispherical, black, ostioles papillate. Peridium 25–38 μm wide, consists of 6–7 layers of brown to dark brown textura angularis cells. Paraphyses 4–8 μm wide, hyaline, abundant, persistent, unbranched, septate. Asci 85–115 × 9–17 μm (x̄ = 97 × 12 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, long pedicellate, with J+, cylindrical apical ring. Ascospores 13–17 × 7–9 μm (x̄ = 15 × 8 μm, n = 30), overlapping 1–2-seriate, hyaline, becoming opaque green and dark brown when mature, more or less equilaterally ellipsoid, straight, both ends often pointed, 1-celled, guttulate, without appendages, a spore length germ slit on the ventral side, straight. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA at 25–28 °C, reaching 6 cm in seven days, circular in shape, zonate with diffused margins, white color in front view, and pale yellow in reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chang Wat Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Pran Buri District, Pran Buri riverbank, 26 February 2023, Tharindu Bhagya, on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp., TB (MFLU 24-0536), living culture, MFLUCC 25-0025.

Known distribution and hosts.

Thailand (submerged wood of Xylocarpus sp., Rhizophora sp., and submerged wood of Arecaceae sp.) (Dayarathne et al. 2020b; this study)

Notes.

Morphologically, our collection (MFLU 24-0536/MFLUCC 25-0025) resembles the holotype of H.xylocarpi (MFLU 18-0545) in having superficial, carbonaceous, uni-perithecial pseudostromata; 8-spored, cylindrical, unitunicate, long-pedicellate asci with a J+, cylindrical apical ring; and dark brown, unicellular, ellipsoid, straight ascospores with both ends often pointed and a straight germ slit on the ventral side along the spore length (Dayarathne et al. 2020b). However, asci (85–115 × 9–17 μm vs. 126–135 × 20–28 μm) and ascospores (13–17 × 7–9 μm vs. 20–26 × 10–14 μm) of our collection (MFLUCC 25-0025) are smaller than the holotype (Dayarathne et al. 2020b). According to multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, rpb2, and β-tub), our strains (MFLU 24-0536 and MFLUCC 25-0025) cluster with the ex-type strain of H.xylocarpi (MFLU 18-0545) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 10). Considering the morpho-molecular evidence, we conclude that our collection is a new host record on decaying submerged wood of Arecaceae sp. in Thailand.

. Stilbohypoxylon

Henn., Hedwigia 41: 16 (1902)

4941AF0D-E617-5406-95A8-4A4CCC6B16E9

Index Fungorum: IF5264

Facesoffungi Number: FoF03071

Notes.

Stilbohypoxylon was established by Hennings (1902) to accommodate S.moelleri as the type species. Morphologically, this genus is characterized by black, globose to pulvinate stromata, cylindrical asci with a J+, apical ring; and brown, ellipsoidal ascospores surrounded by a thin mucilaginous sheath and a straight or spiral germ slit. Stilbohypoxylon species have geniculosporium-like asexual morphs (Hennings 1902; Rogers and Ju 1997; Petrini 2004; Daranagama et al. 2018). Based on morphology and phylogenetic studies by Daranagama et al. (2018) and Wendt et al. (2018), Stilbohypoxylon was accepted in Xylariaceae. Stilbohypoxylon species cluster with Xylaria species in two subclades, providing evidence that this genus is polyphyletic (Hsieh et al. 2010; Li et al. 2017; Daranagama et al. 2018; Wendt et al. 2018). Hyde et al. (2024) listed 20 species under this genus, while 18 are included in the Index Fungorum (2025).

. Stilbohypoxylon chiangraiense

Rathnayaka, K.D. Hyde & Chethana sp. nov.

15643B0D-C30C-577A-B93F-47A23D7CBEBF

Index Fungorum number: IF903884

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17289

Fig. 12

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Stilbohypoxylonchiangraiense on the dead branch of Saraca sp. (MFLU 24-0529, Holotype). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of stromata on the host, showing yellow scales (arrows indicating yellow scales); d, e. A horizontal section through a stroma; f. Peridium; g. Paraphyses; h, i. Immature asci; j. Apical apparatus stained in blue with Melzer’s reagent; k–m. Ascospores; n, o. Ascospores with a germ slit (arrows indicating a spiral germ slit); p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d, e); 20 μm (g–j); 10 μm (f, k–o).

Etymology.

The epithet chiangraiense refers to Chiang Rai Province, where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU 24-0529.

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Saraca sp. Sexual morph: Stromata superficial, visible as a black conical or globose structure on the host surface, solitary, showing yellow scales on mature stromata, carbonaceous, brittle, fragile. Ascomata 420–440 × 450–510 μm (x̄ = 427 × 471 μm, n = 10), black, carbonaceous, globose to mammiform, 1 per stroma, covered with remnants of the host tissue, ostioles papillate. Peridium 10–20 μm wide, thick-walled, composed of several layers of cells of textura angularis, dark brown to black. Paraphyses 2–3 μm wide, filamentous, cylindrical, aseptate, unbranched, longer than asci. Asci 48–58 × 7–9 μm (x̄ = 53 × 8 μm, n = 10), unitunicate, cylindrical, long pedicellate, apically rounded, with a J+, apical ring (rarely seen). Ascospores 21–27 × 10–14 μm (x̄ = 24 × 12 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, hyaline when immature, dark brown at maturity, equilateral ellipsoidal to broadly fusoid, unicellular, guttulate, with a spiral germ slit over the whole spore length. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. The slow-growing colonies on the PDA reached 1–1.5 cm diam. After five days at 25 °C, circular in shape, cottony, slightly less dense towards the edge, white color in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Nang Lae village, on decaying branch of Saraca sp. (Fabaceae), 18 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA13 (MFLU 24-0529, holotype); ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 24-0611.

Notes.

Based on the multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, rpb2, and β-tub), our collections (MFLU 24-0529 and MFLUCC 24-0611) formed a distinct lineage sister to S.quisquiliarum (YMJ 172) with 90% ML bootstrap and 0.98 PP support (Fig. 10). Stilbohypoxylonchiangraiense shares morphologies similar to the Stilbohypoxylon genus by having superficial, solitary, globose stromata, cylindrical asci with a J+, apical ring; and brown, ellipsoidal ascospores with a spiral germ slit. However, asci are very rarely observed in S.chiangraiense. Stilbohypoxylonquisquiliarum differs from our fungal collection in that its yellow scales turn brown when mature, which are present on the stromata. In addition, our fungal collection has shorter ascospores (21–27 μm) than S.quisquiliarum (27.5–28.5 μm) (Petrini 2004). The base pair differences between S.chiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0611) and S.quisquiliarum (YMJ 172) are as follows: ITS = 1.9% (11/578), β-tub = 11.9% (123/1033). Considering the morpho-molecular data analysis, we established S.chiangraiense as a new species in Stilbohypoxylon.

. Hypoxylon

Bull., Hist. Champ. Fr. (Paris) 1: 168 (1791)

07775400-3971-5843-993C-A1103C1CD36C

Index Fungorum: IF2456

Facesoffungi Number: FoF02980

Notes.

Bulliard (1791) introduced Hypoxylon to accommodate H.fragiforme (basionym: H.coccineum) as the type species. The sexual morph of this genus is characterized by ascomata embedded in a colorful, effused, or pulvinate stroma containing secondary metabolites (Ju and Rogers 1996). The ascomata are perithecioid, monostichous, and open separately through umbilicate, rarely slightly papillate ostioles. The asci are 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, stipitate, and provided with a typically amyloid apical apparatus. The ascospores are unicellular, ellipsoid, and brown and have a germ slit on the most convex side of the inequilateral ascospores (Ju and Rogers 1996). The asexual morph is characterized by a nodulisporium-like morph, but other types of conidial states have also been observed, such as sporothrix-like, virgariella-like, and periconiella-like (Ju and Rogers 1996). The evolutionary relationships of hypoxylaceous fungi have been studied using phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic, and morphological data (Kuhnert et al. 2021). Most of the Hypoxylon species have been able to produce highly bioactive secondary metabolites, which are released from the stromata (Ju and Rogers 1996; Kuhnert et al. 2014b; Fournier et al. 2016). Hypoxylon species have a cosmopolitan distribution and are recorded as saprotrophs that grow on dead wood, endophytes in seed plants, and facultative parasites on diseased hosts (Ju and Rogers 1996; Stadler 2011; Kuhnert et al. 2014a; Daranagama et al. 2018; Helaly et al. 2018; Rogers 2018). Hyde et al. (2024) listed 200 species under this genus, while 466 are included in the Index Fungorum (2025).

Phylogenetic analyses for Hypoxylaceae

For Hypoxylon, 150 taxa were included in the combined data set (ITS, LSU, rpb2, and β-tub). Graphostromaplatystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosaspeciosa (CLM RV86), Xylariaarbuscula (CBS 126415), and X.hypoxylon (CBS 122620) were used as the outgroup taxa. After alignment, the dataset comprised 3003 characters, including gaps (ITS = 614 bp, LSU = 822 bp, rpb2 = 1017 bp, β-tub = 550 bp). Both the ML and BI analyses exhibit a similar tree topology. The best-scoring RAxML tree was obtained (Fig. 13), with a final likelihood value of -75469.623433. The matrix included 1852 distinct alignment patterns, with 29.09% undetermined characters or gaps. The estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.247189, C = 0.251478, G = 0.262907, and T = 0.238426; substitution rates were AC = 1.284950, AG = 4.479967, AT = 1.344479, CG = 1.074839, CT = 6.471802, and GT = 1.0; and the gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.313445. In the BI analysis, the average standard deviation of the split frequencies was 0.01 after 5,000,000 generations of runs. The phylogenetic tree topology is similar to the study by Karimi et al. (2023). According to the phylogenetic analyses, our strains (MFLU 24-0530, MFLUCC 25-0024, MFLUCC 24-0613, MFLU 24-0532, and MFLUCC 24-0612) cluster within Hypoxylon and Hypomontagnella.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Graphostromaplatystomum (CBS 270.87), Natonodosaspeciosa (CLM RV86), Xylariaarbuscula (CBS 126415), and X.hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented in blue, and type strains are in bold.

Taxonomy

. Hypoxylon thailandicum

Rathnayaka, K.D. Hyde & Chethana sp. nov.

8CECEFFF-0DB3-539F-ADEE-0E56590A994E

Index Fungorum number: IF903885

Facesoffungi Number: FoF00373

Fig. 14

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Hypoxylonthailandicum on a dead branch of Bambusavulgaris (MFLU 24-0530, Holotype). a. Substrate; b–d. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; e, f. A horizontal section through an ascoma; g. Peridium; h–j. Asci; k. Inamyloid apical ascal apparatus stained with Melzer’s reagent; l–o. Ascospores; p. A germinated ascospore; q, r. Colony on the PDA (q upper, r lower). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c, d); 100 μm (e, f); 20 μm (h–k); 10 μm (g, l–p).

Etymology.

The epithet thailandicum refers to Thailand, where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU 24-0530.

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Bambusavulgaris. Sexual morph: Stromata 0.3–1 cm long × 0.1–0.5 cm wide, pulvinate, with conspicuous perithecial mounds, gregarious, surface bright orange; orange-red granules immediately beneath the surface and between ascomata, the tissue below the perithecial layer inconspicuous. Ascomata 200–220 × 195–203 × 180–210 µm (x̄ = 210 × 200 × 190 µm, n = 5), globose, ostiolate. Peridium 21–27 μm wide, two-layered, outer layer composed of dark brown to brown cells of textura angularis, inner layer composed of hyaline cells of textura angularis. Asci 60–105 × 8–11 µm (x̄ = 80 × 9.4 µm, n = 15), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, pedicellate, with an inamyloid, apical ascal apparatus. Ascospores 13–18 × 7–10 µm (x̄ = 16 × 8.4 µm, n = 30), uniseriate, slightly overlapping, one-celled, ellipsoid, with narrowly rounded ends, straight, initially light brown, becoming brown to dark brown at maturity, rough surface, guttulate. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters.

Ascospores germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. The slow-growing colonies on the PDA reach 1–2 cm diam. after seven days at 25 °C, circular in shape, cottony, slightly less dense towards the edge, white color in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Mae Chan District, Mae Chan village, on a dead branch of Bambusavulgaris (Poaceae), 18 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA06 (MFLU 24-0530, holotype); ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 25-0024.

Notes.

In multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, LSU, rpb2, and β-tub), our novel isolates (MFLU 24-0530 and MFLUCC 25-0024) formed a separate lineage sister to H.begae (S99 and YMJ 215) and H.blackburniae (BRIP 72467b) with 97% ML bootstrap and 0.95 PP support (Fig. 13). Morphologically, our new fungal collection (MFLUCC 25-0024) is similar to Hypoxylon by having ascomata embedded in colorful effused or pulvinate stromata (Ju and Rogers 1996). Due to the lack of morphological data for H.begae and H.blackburniae, we could not compare the morphological characters between these three species. When comparing the ITS base pair differences (without gaps) between H.thailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) with H.begae (YMJ 215) and H.blackburniae (BRIP 72467b), there are 9.5% (46/482) and 9.12% (44/482) differences, respectively. For β-tub, there is a 10.21% (43/423) base pair difference (without gaps) between H.thailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) and H.begae (YMJ 215). However, due to the lack of sequence availability, we were unable to compare the base pair differences between H.thailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) and H.blackburniae (BRIP 72467b). Additionally, the absence of rpb2 sequences prevented a comparison among H.begae, H.blackburniae, and our collection. Based on the available morphological and phylogenetic evidence, we propose H.thailandicum as a new species.

. Hypomontagnella

Sir, L. Wendt & C. Lamb., in Lambert, Wendt, Hladki, Stadler & Sir, Mycol. Progr. 18(1–2): 190 (2019)

7C5C3D09-44C5-57EC-874C-F912589A8731

Index Fungorum: IF827251

Facesoffungi Number: FoF06136

Notes.

Lambert et al. (2019) introduced Hypomontagnella to accommodate H.monticulosa as the type species and included several species previously described under Hypoxylon. Hypomontagnella differs from Annulohypoxylon and Jackrogersella by smooth perispores or transversally striate ornamentations. Additionally, Hypomontagnella species are distinguished from Hypoxylon species by woody to carbonaceous stromata that lack colored granules (Lambert et al. 2019). They have papillate ostioles, usually with black annulate discs, without apparent KOH-extractable pigments in mature stromata (Lambert et al. 2019). The cultures of Hypomontagnella species produce sporothrolide-type strong antifungal polyketides. Species in this genus have been reported as saprobic or endophytic on plants (Lambert et al. 2019). Six species are listed under Hypomontagnella in Hyde et al. (2024) and Index Fungorum (2025).

. Hypomontagnella hibisci

Rathnayaka, K.D. Hyde & Chethana sp. nov.

B0C3A28D-4C43-5037-9064-D8FB59AF9633

Index Fungorum number: IF903886

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17290

Fig. 15

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Hypomontagnellahibisci on a decaying branch of Hibiscus sp. (MFLU 24-0532, Holotype). a. Substrate; b. Mature stroma on the bark; c. Stromatal surface showing papillate and ostiolar discs (indicated by white arrows); d–f. Stromata in vertical sections; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i–m. Asci; n. Apical apparatus with Melzer’s reagent; o–r. Ascospores; s, t. Colony on the PDA (s upper, t lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 50 μm (f); 10 μm (g, n); 20 μm (h–m); 5 μm (o–r).

Etymology.

In reference to the host genus from which the fungus was collected

Holotype.

MFLU 24-0532

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Hibiscus sp. Sexual morph: Stromata effused-pulvinate, with conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecial mounds, surface blackish, carbonaceous tissue immediately beneath the surface and between the perithecial surface and perithecia. Ascomata 157–300 × 133–218 μm (x̄ = 223 × 178 μm, n = 5), globose to spherical, ostioles higher than the stromatal surface. Peridium 13–26 μm diam., composed of thin-walled, brown to dark brown cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses 2–3 μm wide, hyaline, filamentous, long, branched, aseptate, arising from the base of ascomata. Asci 78–100 × 5–6 μm (x̄ = 90 × 5.4 μm, n = 25), the spore-bearing parts 46–53 µm long, 8-spored, cylindrical, with J-, apical ring and a stipe of 28–36 µm long. Ascospores 7–9 × 3–5 μm (x̄ = 8 × 4 μm, n = 30), unicellular, uni-seriate, slightly overlapping, ellipsoid, with narrowly rounded ends, slightly curved, hyaline to dark brown, smooth to finely roughened, guttulate. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores are germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA reach 1.5–2.5 cm diam. after seven days at 25 °C, circular in shape, flat, cottony, slightly less dense towards the edge, white color in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Mae Fah Luang University premises, on a decaying branch of Hibiscus sp. (Malvaceae), 08 March 2024, Zaw Lin Tun, AZ01 (MFLU 24-0532, holotype); ex-type culture MFLUCC 24-0613.

Notes.

Hypomontagnellahibisci (MFLUCC 24-0613) is similar to Hypomontagnella in having stromata with conical, papillate ostioles and cylindrical asci with a short pedicel (Lambert et al. 2019). According to the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, our strains (MFLU 24-0532 and MFLUCC 24-0613) formed a separate lineage sister to H.monticulosa (MUCL 54604 and MFLUCC 24-0613) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 13). However, H.hibisci has globose to spherical perithecia and asci with J-, apical rings, whereas H.monticulosa has spherical to obovoid perithecia and asci with J+ discoid apical rings (Chethana et al. 2021a). Additionally, H.monticulosa differs from H.hibisci by having ascospores with a straight, spore-length germ slit, which is not observed in H.hibisci (Chethana et al. 2021a). With the evidence of unique morphology and distinct phylogeny, we introduce H.hibisci as a new species.

. Hypomontagnella monticulosa

(Mont.) Sir, L. Wendt & C. Lamb., in Lambert, Wendt, Hladki, Stadler & Sir, Mycol. Progr. 18(1–2): 190 (2019)

6CFB1552-E384-563C-A0BF-D92B6618326B

Index Fungorum: IF827252

Facesoffungi Number: FoF06781

Fig. 16

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Hypomontagnellamonticulosa on a dead branch of Macarangapeltata (MFLU 24-0531, a new host record). a. Substrate; b, c. Appearance of mature stroma on the host; d. A horizontal section through ascomata; e. Paraphyses; f–i. Asci; j. Apical apparatus stained blue with Melzer’s reagent; k–n. Ascospores; o. A germinated ascospore; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e–i); 10 μm (j, o); 5 μm (k–n).

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Macarangapeltata. Sexual morph: Stromata effused-pulvinate, with conspicuous to inconspicuous perithecial mounds, surface blackish, woody to carbonaceous tissue immediately beneath the surface and between the perithecial surface and the perithecia. Perithecia globose to subglobose, ostioles higher than the stromatal surface. Paraphyses 4–7 μm wide, hyaline, abundant, persistent, unbranched, septate. Asci 70–95 × 4–6.5 μm (x̄ = 82 × 5.4 μm, n = 20), the spore-bearing parts 40–50 µm long with stipes 36–44 µm long, 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with J+, discoid apical ring. Ascospores 6–8 × 3–4 μm (x̄ = 7.2 × 3.4 μm, n = 30), uniseriate, unicellular, ellipsoid-inequilateral, with broadly to less frequently narrowly rounded ends, light brown to brown, smooth. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores are germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. The slow-growing colonies on the PDA reach 1.0–1.5 cm diam. after seven days at 25 °C, circular in shape, flat, cottony, slightly less dense towards the edge, white color in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Nang Lae village, on decaying branch of Macarangapeltata (Euphorbiaceae), 18 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA10 (MFLU 24-0531); living culture, MFLUCC 24-0612.

Known distribution and hosts.

Argentina (Ficusmaroma) (Lambert et al. 2019), French Polynesia (dead wood) (Lambert et al. 2019), Indonesia, Malaysia (lichen, Sargassum seaweed) (Zainee et al. 2018), Paraguay (dead wood) (Lambert et al. 2019), Thailand (Leucaenaleucocephala, Macarangapeltata) (Chethana et al. 2021a, this study), USA (Cladonialeporina) (U’Ren et al. 2016).

Notes.

Morphologically, our collection (MFLUCC 24-0612) is similar to the ex-type strain of H.monticulosa (MUCL 54604), which was collected from a dead branch of Leucaenaleucocephala in Thailand (Chethana et al. 2021a). However, asci (70–95 μm vs. 85–110 μm) and ascospores (6–8 μm vs. 7.5–9.3 μm) of our collection (MFLUCC 24-0612) are shorter than the ex-type strain (MUCL 54604) (Chethana et al. 2021a). According to multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, LSU, rpb2, and β-tub), our strain (MFLUCC 24-0612) clusters with the ex-type strain of H.monticulosa (MUCL 54604) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 13). Based on the morpho-molecular evidence, we established the first host record of H.monticulosa on Macarangapeltata in Thailand.

. Diatrypella

(Ces. & De Not.) De Not., Sfer. Ital.: 29 (1863)

A090A059-70E2-5033-8C01-436EEC16FB85

Index Fungorum: IF1505

Facesoffungi Number: FoF11777

Notes.

Cesati and De Notaris (1863) introduced Diatrypella with D.verruciformis as the type species. This genus is characterized by stromata, which are conical to truncate, cushion-like or discoid, and usually delimited by a black zone within host tissues, umbilicate or sulcate ostiolar necks. Asci are cylindrical, polysporous, and long-stalked, and ascospores are hyaline to yellowish. Diatrypella species have a libertella-like coelomycete asexual morph (Kirk et al. 2008; Hyde et al. 2020a). There are 74 Diatrypella species in Species Fungorum (2024), and only 23 of them have sequence data.

Phylogenetic analysis for Diatrypaceae

The ITS and β-tub combined data set consists of 144 taxa representing strains of Diatrypaceae, including Kretzschmariadeusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylariahypoxylon (CBS 122620) as the outgroup taxa. The aligned data set comprises 1404 characters, including gaps (ITS = 504 bp, β-tub = 897 bp). The topology of the BI tree was similar to that of the ML tree. The best-scoring RAxML tree, with a final likelihood value of -20102.616796, is shown in Fig. 17. The matrix comprises 944 distinct alignment patterns, with 36.45% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.222804, C = 0.272806, G = 0.233404, T = 0.270985; substitution rates AC = 1.101521, AG = 3.499467, AT = 1.354291, CG = 0.845871, CT = 4.738241, GT = 1.0; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.360572. In the BI analysis, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.009 after 9,000,000 generations of runs. The phylogenetic tree topology is similar to the study by Dissanayake et al. (2024). According to the phylogenetic analyses, our strains, MFLU 24-0533 and MFLU 24-0534, formed a separate clade with Diatrypellaoregonensis (CA117 and DPL200), D.pseudooregonensis (GMB0041 and GMB0040), and D.verruciformis (UCROK1467 and UCROK754) with 93% ML bootstrap and 0.94 pp, while MFLUCC 24-0614 clusters with Paraeutrypellacitricola (HVGRF01 and HKAS 133111) with 99% ML and 0.97 pp bootstrap support.

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on the combined dataset of ITS and β-tub. The tree is rooted to Kretzschmariadeusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylariahypoxylon (CBS 122620). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are presented in blue, and type strains are in bold.

Taxonomy

. Diatrypella thailandica

Rathnayaka, K.D. Hyde & Chethana sp. nov.

91BF7F2A-2103-54FF-983D-E06CE865E42E

Index Fungorum number: IF903887

Facesoffungi Number: FoF17291

Fig. 18

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Diatrypellathailandica on a dead branch of Fabaceae sp. (MFLU 24-0533, holotype) a. Substrate; b, c. Stromata on the substrate; d. Cross-section of a stroma; e. Vertical section through stroma showing ostiole and perithecia; f. Ostiole; g. Peridium; h. Paraphyses; i–l. Asci; m. Apical apparatus in Melzer’s reagent; n–q. Ascospores. Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e, f); 10 μm (g); 20 μm (h–m); 5 μm (n–q).

Etymology.

The epithet thailandica refers to Thailand, from where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU 24-0533.

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Fabaceae sp. Sexual morph: Stromata 0.5–1 mm in diam., well-developed, with groups of 10–15 perithecia, solitary to gregarious, erumpent, black, immersed, globose to subglobose or conical shape. Endostroma white to light yellow. Ascomata 410–450 μm high × 275–370 μm diam. (x̄ = 434 × 326 μm, n = 10), perithecial, immersed in stromata, 2–4 perithecial arrangement, subglobose, with an individual ostiole. Ostiolar canal 200–253 μm high, 110–132 μm diam., cylindrical, periphysate, with yellowish pigment around ostioles. Peridium 10–25 μm wide, composed of 3–7 layers, hyaline to brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium 2.4–6 μm wide, comprising dense, hyaline, aseptate, unbranched paraphyses, tapering towards the apex, embedded in a hyaline gelatinous matrix. Asci 80–150 × 11–23 μm (x̄ = 107 × 16 μm, n = 25), polysporous, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric-clavate, with a J-apical ring and a long pedicel. Ascospores 6–8 × 1–3 μm (x̄ = 7.5 × 2.3 μm, n = 30), multi-seriate, crowded, initially hyaline, becoming pale yellowish at maturity, oblong to allantoid, aseptate, slightly curved, smooth-walled, mostly with small guttules. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores are germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from both sides of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA at 25–28 °C reach 2 cm in 10 days, medium dense, circular to slightly irregular, cottony, white at first, becoming light brownish yellow in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Nang Lae village, on a decaying branch of Morus sp. (Moraceae), 18 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA14 (MFLU 24-0533, holotype); ibid., on a dead branch of Fabaceae sp. (Fabaceae), 20 March 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA15 (MFLU 24-0534, topotype).

Notes.

Our new fungal collection (MFLU 24-0533 and MFLU 24-0534) fits within Diatrypella by having conical-shaped stromata, white to light yellow, well-developed endostroma, cylindrical, polysporous, and long-stalked asci, and hyaline to yellowish ascospores (Hyde et al. 2020a). According to the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (ITS and β-tub), our strains (MFLU 24-0533 and MFLU 24-0534) formed a separate clade sister to D.oregonensis (CA117, DPL200), D.pseudooregonensis (GMB0039, GMB000), and D.verruciformis (UCROK1467, UCROK754) with 93% ML bootstrap and 0.94 PP support (Fig. 17). Morphologically, D.thailandica differs from D.oregonensis, D.pseudooregonensis, and D.verruciformis, as mentioned in Table 2. Diatrypellathailandica has polysporous asci, while D.oregonensis and D.pseudooregonensis have 8-spored asci. Diatrypellaverruciformis differs from our fungal collection by having diamond- or star-shaped ascomata (Table 2). When comparing the ITS and β-tub base pairs (without gaps) between D.thailandica (MFLU 24-0533) with D.oregonensis (CA117), D.pseudooregonensis (GMB0039), and D.verruciformis (UCROK1467), there are 2.15% (11/512), 3.3% (16/485), and 2.73% (14/512) base pair differences in the ITS and 2.17% (18/828), 2.53% (21/828), and 1.7% (14/828) for β-tub, respectively. Based on both morphological and molecular evidence, we introduce Diatrypellathailandica (MFLU 24-0533) as a new species in Diatrypella.

Table 2.

Synopsis of morphological characters of sexual morphs between D.thailandica and species in the sister clade.

Species Stromata Perithecial neck (μm) Asci Ascospores References
D.thailandica groups of 10–15 perithecia, globose to subglobose or conical shape, 0.5–1 mm in diam 200–253 high, 110–132 diam. Polysporous, 80–150 × 11–23 (x̄ = 107 × 16) μm 6–8 × 1–3 (x̄ = 7.5 × 2.3) μm, L/W = 3.26 This study
D.oregonensis pustules of 1–30 perithecia pulvinate, hemispherical or forming linear stripes, 0.3–0.6 mm diam 8-spored, 50–65 (–80) × 6–9.5 μm (7–)10–12 (14) × 2–2.5 Trouillas et al. (2010)
D.pseudooregonensis groups of 3–16 perithecia, 2 × 1.5 mm 218.5–465 high, 112–257 diam. 8-spored, 95–149 × 6.5–11.5 (av. = 120 × 10.5) μm 11–16 × 1.5–3.5 (x̄ = 14 × 2.5) μm, L/W = 5.6 Long et al. (2021)
D.verruciformis Diamond or star shape, 5–6 × 2–3 mm Difficulty to recognize Multispored, 120–140 (170) × 10–14 (16) μm 6–7 (8) × 1.5–2 µm http://www.taunuspilz.de/coppermine/displayimage.php?pid=9376

. Paraeutypella

L.S. Dissan., J.C. Kang, Wijayaw. & K.D. Hyde, Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63864, 11 (2021)

D95C3B42-DBE2-50A3-BE83-694941A3E59B

Index Fungorum: IF557954

Facesoffungi number: FoF09231

Notes.

Paraeutypella was introduced by Dissanayake et al. (2021) to accommodate P.guizhouensis as the type species, together with P.citricola and P.vitis, which were previously classified under Eutypella sensu lato. The genus is characterized by erumpent, clustered, irregularly shaped, dark brown to black, poorly developed stromata, 8-spored asci; and ascospores that are allantoid, overlapping, and subhyaline (Trouillas et al. 2011; de Almeida et al. 2016; Dissanayake et al. 2021). A coelomycetous asexual morph has been recorded in this genus, which was characterized by black, subconic, multi-loculate, largely prosenchymatous conidiomata with yellowish conidial masses. Conidia are hyaline, single-celled, slightly curved, and guttulate (Glawe and Jacobs 1987). There are six species listed in the Index Fungorum (2025).

. Paraeutypella citricola

(Speg.) L.S. Dissan., Wijayaw., J.C. Kang & K.D. Hyde, Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63864, 14 (2021)

2D28D00C-1D4A-5D13-8A8E-923EDBB3BB27

Index Fungorum: IF557954

Facesoffungi Number: FoF09150

Fig. 19

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Paraeutypellacitricola on a dead branch of Swieteniamacrophylla (MFLU 24-0535, a new host record). a. Substrate; b. Stromata on the substrate; c. A cross-section of a stroma; d. A vertical section through the stroma shows ostioles and perithecia; e. Peridium; f. Paraphyses; g–k. Asci; l–o. Ascospores; p, q. Colony on the PDA (p upper, q lower). Scale bars: 5 mm (b); 1 mm (c); 200 μm (d); 20 μm (e–k); 5 μm (l–o).

  • Eutypella citricola Syd. & P. Syd., Hedwigia 49: 80 (1909), nom. illegit., Art. 53.1. Basionym.

Description.

Saprobic on a dead branch of Swieteniamacrophylla. Sexual morph: Stromata immersed in the bark of dead branches, erumpent, aggregated, circular to irregular in shape, superficial, carbonaceous. Endostroma white to light yellow. Ostiole opening separately, papillate or apapillate, central. Ascomata 840–880 μm high × 430–455 μm diam. (x̄ = 867 × 446 µm, n = 10), perithecial, with groups of 5–10 perithecia arranged in a valsoid configuration, black, subglobose, clustered, immersed in ascostroma with an ostiolar neck. Necks 220–265 μm long (x̄ = 248 µm, n = 10), papillate, central ostiolar canal filled with paraphyses. Peridium 25–48 μm wide, composed of two layers of textura angularis to textura prismatica; inner layer cells hyaline, outer layer cells brown to dark brown. Hamathecium 3–5 μm wide (x̄ = 4 µm, n = 15) comprises hyaline, long, narrow, unbranched, aseptate, guttulate cells, paraphyses arising from the base of perithecia. Asci 56–94 × 5–7 μm (x̄ = 67 × 6.4 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, thin-walled, clavate to cylindrical clavate, long pedicellate (35–55 μm), J- apical ring. Ascospores 7–9 × 2–3 μm (x̄ = 8 × 2.4 μm, n = 40), overlapping 2–3 seriate, allantoid, hyaline to light brown, smooth, aseptate, usually with small guttules. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics.

Ascospores are germinated on the PDA within 24 hours at 25 °C. Germ tubes are produced from one side of the ascospore. Colonies on the PDA at 25–28 °C reaching 3–5 cm in five days, medium dense, circular to slightly irregular, cottony, white color in the front view, and pale yellow in the reverse view.

Material examined.

Thailand • Chiang Rai, Nang Lae village, on a decaying branch of Swieteniamacrophylla (Meliaceae), 08 April 2024, Achala Rathnayaka, AA16 (MFLU 24-0535); living culture, MFLUCC 24-0614.

Known distribution.

Wide host range and widely distributed in temperate, tropical, and subtropical regions (Senwanna et al. 2021).

Notes.

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, our collection (MFLUCC 24-0614) clustered with other strains of P.citricola (HKAS 13311 and HVGRF01) with 100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 17). Morphologically, our collection is similar to the holotype of P.citricola (HMAS 290660), which was collected from the dead twigs of Acerpalmatum in China (Dissanayake et al. 2021). Both specimens share similar morphological characteristics, including immersed, erumpent, aggregated, superficial, carbonaceous stromata; black, subglobose, clustered ascomata immersed in the ascostroma with an ostiolar neck; 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindrical-clavate, long pedicellate asci with a J- apical ring; and allantoid, hyaline to light brown, aseptate ascospores, usually with small guttules (Dissanayake et al. 2021). However, our collection has a shorter neck (220–265 µm vs. 360–390 µm) and longer asci (56–94 µm vs. 70–75 µm) than the holotype (Dissanayake et al. 2021). Based on the morpho-molecular evidence, Paraeutypellacitricola has been recorded from Thailand on various woody plants, including Heveabrasiliensis (Senwanna et al. 2021), Magnolia sp. (de Silva et al. 2022), and Microcospaniculata (Afshari et al. 2023). We identified our collection as a new host record of Paraeutypellacitricola from Swieteniamacrophylla from Thailand.

Preliminary screening for antibacterial activity

In the present study, we conducted a preliminary screening to assess the antibacterial activity of selected fungal species against Bacillussubtilis (TISTR 1248) and Escherichiacoli (TISTR 527). Two newly introduced species from Hypoxylaceae and Xylariaceae, Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) and Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024), showed antibacterial activity against Bacillussubtilis, each producing a 2 mm zone of inhibition, indicating partial inhibition compared to the positive control. Additionally, other Xylariales species, including Hypoxylon sp. (MFLUCC 18-1207), Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 18-1207), and Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014), demonstrated antibacterial activity against E.coli, each producing a 3 mm zone of inhibition, respectively, compared to the positive control (Fig. 20).

Figure 20.

Figure 20.

Preliminary screening of antimicrobial activity using the agar plug diffusion method against Bacillussubtilis (a, b) and E.coli (c, d). a.Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606); b.Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024); c.Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 18-1207), and Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014). Positive control (ampicillin discs): Left side of the plate in a and b; middle of the petri plate in c.

Metabolite profiling of selected fungal extracts by HPLC coupled to LC-QTOF-MS analyses

The crude extracts of Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense, Hypoxylonthailandicum, Daldiniaeschscholtzii, and Xylariachrysanthum were weighed at 0.01 g, 0.02 g, 0.08 g, and 0.02 g, respectively. An untargeted screening approach initially detected secondary metabolites at wavelengths of 256 and 425 nm. Secondary metabolites have been spotted by the information from spectra and molecular weight, matched with reference compounds from the online databases. Some characteristic HPLC chromatograms are shown in Figs 21, 22.

Figure 21.

Figure 21.

HPLC chromatograms of the culture extracts of Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) a. Mycelium in MEB media; b. Supernatant in MEB media. Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024); c. Mycelium in YMB media; d. Supernatant in YMB media.

Figure 22.

Figure 22.

HPLC chromatograms of the culture extracts of Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014) a. in MEB media; b. Phosphoenol-4-deoxy-3-tetrulosonate; c. in YMB media; d. Benzbromarone; e.Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 18-1207) in MEB media; f. Chlorfenson. Peaks corresponding to metabolites are indicated in the HPLC profiles.

As Fig. 21 depicts, the HPLC analysis revealed distinct differences in the metabolite profiles of Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense and Hypoxylonthailandicum when cultivated in different media. For Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense, the metabolic output was highly dependent on the growth medium. The mycological extract derived from malt extract broth (MEB) exhibited a complex metabolite profile with numerous peaks, indicating the production of a diverse array of secondary metabolites. This suggests that MEB provides favorable conditions for the production of a broad range of secondary metabolites. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, where MEB was shown to enhance the production of secondary metabolites in various fungi, including Hypoxylon and Xylaria species, due to its rich composition of carbohydrates, amino acids, and vitamins (Kuhnert et al. 2015). In contrast, potato dextrose broth (PDB) resulted in significantly fewer peaks, suggesting a reduced metabolic diversity under these conditions. This could be attributed to the simpler composition of PDB, which may not provide the necessary nutrients or environmental conditions to induce the production of a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites.

Similarly, yeast malt broth (YMB) also showed fewer peaks compared to MEB, suggesting that PDB and YMB may not be as conducive for secondary metabolite production in Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense. However, it is noteworthy that Hypoxylonthailandicum exhibited the highest number of well-defined peaks in YMB, indicating that this medium was optimal for the secondary metabolite production of this species. Similar results have been shown in other studies where they report unique metabolites in YMB, such as hypoxylonols, which are not as prominently produced in other media (Kuhnert et al. 2017). These findings highlight the influence of nutritional composition on secondary metabolite production in different fungal taxa. The variation in peak intensities and numbers across different media indicates that metabolite expression is medium-dependent and species-specific, and hence, must be carefully considered in natural product discovery and metabolic studies.

The mass spectrum obtained from the analysis suggested an identification of many compounds. Based on the HPLC profile of the Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) isolate, the dominant compounds in the mycelium grown in MEB medium are 5-amino-2-(p-toluidino)benzenesulphonic acid (C13H14N2O3S), sulfamethoxazole sodium (C10H10N3NaO3S), N,N-dibutyl-3-methyl-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)aniline (C21H36BNO2), and 2-(benzyloxy)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridine (C18H22BNO3), detected at retention times of 6.0, 11.1, 19.0, and 20.0 minutes, respectively (Fig. 21a). Among these compounds, 5-amino-2-(p-toluidino)benzenesulphonic acid is an aromatic sulfonic acid primarily used in the dye and pigment industries (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025a). Sulfamethoxazole sodium is the sodium salt form of sulfamethoxazole, which is used as a broad-spectrum sulfonamide antibiotic. Sulfamethoxazole sodium is mainly used in treating bacterial infections, including urinary tract infections (UTIs), respiratory infections, gastrointestinal infections, and skin infections (Kemnic and Coleman 2022).

The dominant compounds of the Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) in the supernatant in MEB medium are Pramipexole (C10H17N3S), 5-Ethyl-1-ethoxymethyl-6-(3,5-dimethylphenylthio)uracil, 10-Deoxymethymycin (C25H43NO6), and Spisulosine (C18H39NO), detected at retention times of 5.0, 11.0, 12.5, and 19.75, respectively (Fig. 21b). Pramipexole is an orally active aminothiazole dopamine and is used to treat Parkinson’s disease (Bennett and Piercey 1999). 5-Ethyl-1-ethoxymethyl-6-(3,5-dimethylphenylthio)-2-thiouracil has antiviral, anticancer, and antimicrobial properties and is active against the majority of viruses (Balzarini et al. 1995). 10-Deoxymethymycin is a glycoside, a macrolide antibiotic that is active against gram-positive bacteria (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025b). Spisulosine is a bioactive sphingoid and has been used as an antineoplastic agent (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025c).

According to the HPLC profile in the Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) isolate, the dominant compounds in the mycelium in YMB medium are 2-Naphthalenepropanol, 6-methoxy-a-methyl-, hydrogen sulfate (C15H18O5S), N-({[Dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]oxy}methyl) aniline (C10H17NO3Si), Phenethyl rutinoside (C20H30O10), and Ethyl vanillin (C9H10O3), detected at retention times of 9.54, 13.55, 20.25, and 20.75 minutes, respectively (Fig. 21c). 2-Naphthalenepropanol, 6-methoxy-α-methyl-, hydrogen sulfate is a sulfate ester of a naphthalene-derived compound, potentially related to antibacterial naphthol derivatives (Roman et al. 2016). N-({[Dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]oxy}methyl)aniline is utilized in various industries due to its unique properties. This compound can be used as a versatile silane coupling agent, enhancing the adhesion, wetting, and durability of different materials. Therefore, N-({[Dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]oxy}methyl)aniline plays a crucial role in the production of adhesives, sealants, coatings, and composites (Inno Specialty Chemicals 2017). Phenethyl rutinoside is a glycoside that exhibits antioxidant activity (Wang et al. 2004). Ethyl vanillin belongs to the benzaldehydes and is used as an antioxidant and flavoring agent. This compound is widely used in the food industry as a food additive and spice in foods, beverages, cosmetics, and drugs (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025d).

The dominant compounds of the Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) in the supernatant in YMB medium are 1,4-dimethyl-7-ethylazulene (C14H16), 3-{[(Benzyloxy)carbonyl]amino}-N-(tertbutoxycarbonyl)-L-alanine—N-cyclohexylcyclo hexanamine (1/1) (C28H45N3O6) and ethyl 2-phenyl-3-furancarboxylate (C13H12O3), detected at retention times of 9.54, 13.55, and 15.59 minutes, respectively (Fig. 21d). Ethyl 2-phenyl-3-furancarboxylate is an ester derivative of furan and can be used in pharmaceuticals, fragrances, and organic synthesis (Yannai 2004).

For Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014), most of the bioactive compounds have been reported in MEB, followed by YMB. In MEB media, Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014) showed phosphoenol-4-deoxy-3-tetrulosonate (C4H7O7P) at 1.5 min retention time. Phosphoenol-4-deoxy-3-tetrulosonate plays a key role as an intermediate compound in the biosynthesis of 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid (KDO), an important molecule in bacterial biochemistry (Fig. 22a, b). Additionally, benzbromarone (C17H12Br2O3) has also been reported to be extracted from Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014) in MEB medium, exhibiting antibacterial properties against Gram-positive pathogens, such as Enterococcusfaecalis, Staphylococcusaureus, S.epidermidis, and Streptococcusagalactiae (Meng et al. 2024).

According to the HPLC profile in the Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014) isolate, the dominant compounds in the YMB medium are benzbromarone (C17H12Br2O3) (Fig. 22c, d). Benzbromarone, a benzofuran derivative, exhibits potential antibacterial activity against Gram-positive pathogens. Benzbromarone is used as a uricosuric drug that has been used in the treatment of gout and hyperuricemia (high levels of uric acid in the blood) (Heel et al. 1977; Meng et al. 2024). Additionally, monensin (C32H58O13), a polyether antibiotic widely used in veterinary medicine for its efficacy against certain Gram-positive bacteria and protozoa, was also reported in the Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014) isolate in YMB medium (Łowicki and Huczyński 2013).

The HPLC analysis of Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 18-1207) cultured in MEB media revealed a peak corresponding to chlorfenson (C12H8Cl2O3S), with a retention time of 1.5 minutes. Chlorfenson is an organophosphorus compound, mainly used as a pesticide and acaricide (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025e). (Fig. 22e, f). Additionally, in the Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 23–0263) isolate, the most abundant compound in the MEB medium is 13-methoxy-heneicosanoic acid (C22H44O3), followed by linoleic acid (C18H32O2). Both 13-methoxy-heneicosanoic acid and linoleic acid exhibited antimicrobial properties and have potential applications in research, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and industrial products (Kusumah et al. 2020). Furthermore, 3-methoxymandelic acid-4-O-sulfate (C9H10O8S) and formoterol (C19H24N2O4) have been identified in Daldiniaeschscholtzii on MEA, demonstrating medicinal properties.

Discussion

Thailand is part of the Indo-Malayan hub of biodiversity and is geographically located in the core of the Greater Mekong Subregion (Chaiwan et al. 2021). Thailand is well known to have tropical seasonal forests with rich and diverse plant communities. Therefore, a huge diversity of fungi can be found in Thailand (Tanaka et al. 2008; Vasilyeva et al. 2012; Hyde et al. 2018).

The present study includes the taxonomy of fungi in the families of Xylariales. Based on morphological aspects and phylogenetic analyses, we provided the taxonomic details of five novel species and ten new host/geographical records within Diatrypaceae, Hypoxylaceae, and Xylariaceae. Taxa were collected from February 2023 to July 2024 from forest areas with a high variety of trees and well-grown understory vegetation. These saprobic specimens were collected from different host families. We introduced two novel species in Hypoxylaceae: Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense from Tamarindusindica and Hypomontagnellahibisci from Hibiscus sp.; two novel species in Xylariaceae: Hypoxylonthailandicum from Bambusavulgaris and Stilbohypoxylonchiangraiense from Saraca sp.; and one novel species in Diatrypaceae: Diatrypellathailandica from Fabaceae sp. from Thailand. These five taxonomic novelties fulfilled the basic criteria for establishing new species, including distinct morphologies and multiple loci for the phylogenetic analyses, as described by Chethana et al. (2021b). Six new host records from Hypoxylaceae were recorded from Thailand: A.bahnphadengense from Berryacordifolia, A.crowfoothodgkiniae from Swieteniamacrophylla, A.purpureonitens from Sterculiatragacantha, A.spougei from Antidesmamadagascariense, A.violaceopigmentum from Syzygiumpolyanthum, and Hypomontagnellamonticulosa from Macarangapeltata. Our study also records A.crowfoothodgkiniae from Thailand for the first time. Astrocystisbambusae from Bambusavulgaris and Haloroselliniaxylocarpi from Arecaceae sp. were recorded as new host records from Xylariaceae in Thailand. In addition, we include Paraeutypellacitricola from Swieteniamacrophylla in Diatrypaceae as a new host record from Thailand.

In this study, we examined the antibacterial activity of the newly introduced species, Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) and Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024), using a preliminary screening test. Both species showed partial inhibition of the growth of Bacillussubtilis. Additionally, some existing Xylariales species, Daldiniaeschscholtzii (MFLUCC 18-1207) and Xylariachrysanthum (MFLUCC 21-0014), also exhibited slight inhibition zones against the bacterial pathogens. Many studies have been conducted on the antimicrobial properties of Annulohypoxylon, Daldinia, Hypoxylon, and Xylaria species (Quang et al. 2005; Yuyama et al. 2017; Pourmoghaddam et al. 2020; Gauchan et al. 2021; Segundo et al. 2022; Brooks et al. 2024; Cedeño-Sanchez et al. 2024; Chen et al. 2024; Yu et al. 2024).

The current study identified some of the secondary metabolites extracted from Xylariales isolates exhibiting biological properties, including antimicrobial, antibiotic, antiviral, and anticancer properties. All four tested fungal species exhibit antibacterial metabolites, including sulfamethoxazole sodium from Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense, 2-naphthalenepropanol, 6-methoxy-α-methyl-, hydrogen sulfate from Hypoxylonthailandicum, benzbromarone from Xylariachrysanthum, and linoleic acid from Daldiniaeschscholtzii. Therefore, this study will generate the initial data necessary for large-scale metabolite extractions for future applications.

The genus Annulohypoxylon can produce secondary metabolites with cytotoxic, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties (Maciel et al. 2018). Here, we recorded sulfamethoxazole sodium as an antibacterial compound from Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense. The genus Hypoxylon has been identified as the main producer of potential bioactive metabolites in Hypoxylaceae (Stadler et al. 2006). Hypoxyloninvadens produces flaviolin, which exhibits antibacterial activity against S.aureus (Becker et al. 2020). Additionally, 2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one, 1-naphthalenol, 4-methoxy-, and hexadecyl methanesulfonate, produced by Hypoxylon species, showed antibacterial activity against human pathogenic bacteria, including B.subtilis, E.coli, S.aureus, and Pseudomonasaeruginosa (Mishra et al. 2020). In this study, the new antibacterial compound 2-Naphthalenepropanol, 6-methoxy-α-methyl-, hydrogen sulfate was derived from Hypoxylonthailandicum.

Additionally, a few compounds with antibacterial properties were reported in the Annulohypoxylonchiangraiense (MFLUCC 24-0606) isolate in MEB medium, including phytosphingosine (C18H39NO3), pipemidic acid (C14H17N5O3), tetranactin (C44H72O12), and neomycin palmitate (C39H78N6O15). Phytosphingosine plays an important role in innate immune defense against epidermal and mucosal bacterial infections (Başpınar et al. 2018). Pipemidic acid is a derivative of piromidic acid and is active against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Shimizu et al. 1975). Tetranactin exhibits antibacterial, insecticidal, and mitogenic properties and inhibits the growth of Gram-positive bacteria (Ando et al. 1971). Neomycin palmitate is active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and mediates its pharmacological action by binding to bacterial ribosomes and inhibiting protein synthesis (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025f).

Based on LC–QTOF–MS analyses, the Hypoxylonthailandicum (MFLUCC 25-0024) isolate in YMB recorded several compounds with antibacterial properties, including pentamidine (C19H24N4O2), phytosphingosine (C18H39NO3), tiamulin (C28H47NO4S), tobramycin (C18H37N5O9), and dibucaine (C20H29N3O2). Pentamidine exhibits antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria (Stokes et al. 2017). Tiamulin is used as an antibacterial drug in veterinary medicine for the treatment of swine dysentery caused by Serpulinahyodysenteriae (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025g), while dibucaine shows antibacterial activity against Staphylococcusaureus (Chakraborty et al. 2024).

The genus Xylaria is an important source of a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites, including terpenoids, nitrogen-containing compounds, polyketides, and lactones. These metabolites exhibit a range of biological activities, such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, cytotoxic, immunosuppressive, and enzyme-inhibitory activities (Chen et al. 2024). Among terpenoids, xylareremophil exhibits weak antibacterial activity against Micrococcusluteus and Proteusvulgaris. In triterpenoids, xylarioxides E and F show antibacterial activity against Alternariaalternata, Curvularialunata, and Colletotrichumgloeosporioides. Additionally, kolokosides A and xylarchalasins A display antibacterial activity against B.subtilis, S.aureus, and E.coli, respectively (Chen et al. 2024). This is the first time benzbromarone has been recorded as an antibacterial compound from Xylariachrysanthum.

In the genus Daldinia, most chemical investigations have focused on D.concentrica and D.eschscholzii, resulting in different kinds of chemical compounds. These include alkaloids, terpenoids, polyketides, polyphenols, and steroids, which exhibit antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, antiviral, cytotoxic, and enzyme-inhibitory activities (Yu et al. 2024). In alkaloids, dalesindoloids A and in chromones, 8-O-methylnodulisporin F and nodulisporin H showed antibacterial activity against S.aureus. In polyketides, 5-hydroxy-2-methoxy-6,7-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone and fusaraisochromenone showed antibacterial activity against Bacilluscereus and Enterococcusfaecalis, S.aureus, Escherichiacoli, and Pseudomonasaeruginosa, respectively. Additionally, Daldisones B showed moderate antibacterial activities against B.cereus, S.aureus, and Enterococcusfaecalis (Yu et al. 2024). However, this is the first time linoleic acid has been recorded from Daldiniaeschscholtzii.

Investigation of new host and geographical records of fungi is important for understanding fungal-host interactions, disease management, monitoring biodiversity, identifying fungal distribution patterns, and revealing hidden fungal diversity (Rathnayaka et al. 2024). The documentation of five new species and nine new host records, including one geographical record within Xylariales, emphasizes the fungal diversity in these provinces in Thailand. This study has led to an expansion of the taxonomic framework of Xylariales as well as to the exploration of fungal diversity in Thailand within various types of dead twigs/branches in the forest ecosystem.

Most undiscovered sexual forms of xylarialean taxa are presumably inconspicuous forms and may be isolated as endophytes. The endophytic life cycle may account for the large numbers of species found in some of these genera (Bhunjun et al. 2022, 2024). However, there are few studies that have been conducted on inconspicuous forms compared to conspicuous forms (Daranagama et al. 2016). Due to the insufficient fresh fungal collection, the taxonomic studies on inconspicuous xylarialean taxa have been limited. Additionally, the genera transferred to new families were previously accepted, although they have uncertain morphologies and phylogenies (Samarakoon et al. 2023). Therefore, it is important to collect more fresh fungal samples to resolve the taxonomic placement of inconspicuous xylarialean taxa.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Astrocystis
XML Treatment for Astrocystis bambusae
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon bahnphadengense
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon chiangraiense
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon crowfoothodgkiniae
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon spougei
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon purpureonitens
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon violaceopigmentum
XML Treatment for Halorosellinia
XML Treatment for Halorosellinia xylocarpi
XML Treatment for Stilbohypoxylon
XML Treatment for Stilbohypoxylon chiangraiense
XML Treatment for Hypoxylon
XML Treatment for Hypoxylon thailandicum
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella hibisci
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella monticulosa
XML Treatment for Diatrypella
XML Treatment for Diatrypella thailandica
XML Treatment for Paraeutypella
XML Treatment for Paraeutypella citricola

Acknowledgments

Achala Rathnayaka expresses her profound gratitude to the Basic Research Fund (Fundamental Fund) of the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF) for their generous support and funding for the project entitled “Taxonomy, phylogeny, and chemo-profiling of selected families in Xylariales” (Grant Nos. 652A01006, 662A01003, and 672A01003). She also gratefully acknowledges the postdoctoral fellowship from Mae Fah Luang University under the Reinventing University grant. The authors extend their sincere thanks to W.A.S. Nuwanthika, A.J. Gajanayake, and D. Thakshila for their valuable suggestions and kind support. Special thanks are due to Shaun Pennycook for his assistance in selecting species epithets for the newly described taxa. Ausana Mapook and K.D. Hyde thank the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) for funding the project entitled “Total fungal diversity in a given forest area with implications towards species numbers, chemical diversity, and biotechnology” (Grant No. N42A650547).

Citation

Rathnayaka AR, Chethana KWT, Manowong A, Bhagya AT, Win H, Tun ZL, Mapook A, Hyde KD (2025) Taxonomy, phylogeny, and bioactive potential of Xylariales (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) from Thailand: novel species discovery, new host and geographical records, and antibacterial properties. MycoKeys 120: 35–117. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.120.155915

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

This study was funded by the Basic Research Fund (Fundamental Fund) of the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF) under the project “Taxonomy, phylogeny, and chemo-profiling of selected families in Xylariales” (Grant Nos. 652A01006, 662A01003, and 672A01003).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: ARR, KWTC. Data curation: ARR. Formal analysis: ARR, KWTC. Funding acquisition: KWTC. Investigation: ARR, AM, KWTC. Methodology: ARR. Project administration: KWTC, AM. Resources: KWTC, AM, ATB, HW, ZLT. Software: ARR. Validation: ARR, KWTC. Visualization: ARR. Writing—original draft: ARR. Writing—review and editing: ARR, KWTC, KDH.

Author ORCIDs

Achala R. Rathnayaka https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-2715

K. W. Thilini Chethana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-9269

Amuhenage T. Bhagya https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3988-298X

Hsan Win https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3830-7222

Zaw L. Tun https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3108-4425

Ausana Mapook https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7929-2429

Kevin D. Hyde https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0762

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Acero FJ, González V, Sánchez-Ballesteros J, Rubio V, Checa J, Bills GF, Salazar O, Platas G, Peláez F. (2004) Molecular phylogenetic studies on the Diatrypaceae based on rDNA-ITS sequences. Mycologia 96(2): 249–259. 10.1080/15572536.2005.11832975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afshari N, Karimi O, Gomes de Farias AR, Suwannarach N, Bhunjun CS, Zeng XY, Lumyong S. (2023) Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel taxa and new host associations. Journal of Fungi 9(12): 1151. 10.3390/jof9121151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alam ST, Le TAN, Park JS, Kwon HC, Kang K. (2019) Antimicrobial biophotonic treatment of ampicillin-resistant Pseudomonasaeruginosa with hypericin and ampicillin cotreatment followed by orange light. Pharmaceutics 11: 641. 10.3390/pharmaceutics11120641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Ando K, Oishi H, Hirano S, Okutomi T, Suzuki K. (1971) Tetranactin, a new miticidal antibiotic. I. Isolation, characterization and properties of tetranactin. The Journal of Antibiotics 24(6): 347–352. 10.7164/antibiotics.24.347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arhipova N, Gaitnieks T, Donis J, Stenlid J, Vasaitis R. (2012) Heart-rot and associated fungi in Alnusglutinosa stands in Latvia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27: 327–336. 10.1080/02827581.2012.670727 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, Buyck B, Chethana KWT, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Jayawardena RS, Lücking R, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Niskanen T, Thambugala KM, Voigt K, Zhao RL, Li GJ, Doilom M, Boonmee S, Yang ZL, Cai Q, Cui YY, Bahkali AH, Chen J, Cui BK, Chen JJ, Dayarathne MC, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Hashimoto A, Hongsanan S, Jones EBG, Larsson E, Li WJ, Li QR, Liu JK, Luo ZL, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Mapook A, McKenzie EHC, Norphanphoun C, Konta S, Pang KL, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Pinruan U, Randrianjohany E, Singtripop C, Tanaka K, Tian CM, Tibpromma S, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Zhang JF, Zhang H, Abdel-Aziz FA, Wedin M, Westberg M, Ammirati JF, Bulgakov TS, Lima DX, Callaghan TM, Callac P, Chang CH, Coca LF, Dal-Forno M, Dollhofer V, Fliegerová K, Greiner K, Griffith GW, Ho HM, Hofstetter V, Jeewon R, Kang JC, Wen TC, Kirk PM, Kytövuori I, Lawrey JD, Xing J, Li H, Liu ZY, Liu XZ, Liimatainen K, Lumbsch HT, Matsumura M, Moncada B, Nuankaew S, Parnmen S, Santiago ALCMDA, Sommai S, Song Y, Souza CAF, de Souza-Motta CM, Su HY, Suetrong S, Wang Y, Wei SF, Wen TC, Yuan HS, Zhou LW, Réblová M, Fournier J, Camporesi E, Luangsa-ard JJ, Tasanathai K, Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Somrithipol S, Diederich P, Millanes AM, Common RS, Stadler M, Yan JY, Li XH, Lee HW, Nguyen TTT, Lee HB, Battistin E, Marsico O, Vizzini A, Vila J, Ercole E, Eberhardt U, Simonini G, Wen HA, Chen XH, Miettinen O, Spirin V, Hernawati (2015) Fungal diversity notes 111–252—Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75: 27–274. 10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. (2016) Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 6(2): 71–79. 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Balzarini J, Baba M, De Clercq E. (1995) Differential activities of 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy) methyl]-6-(phenylthio) thymine derivatives against different human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutant strains. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 39(4): 998–1002. 10.1128/aac.39.4.998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Başpınar Y, Kotmakçı M, Öztürk İ. (2018) Antimicrobial activity of phytosphingosine nanoemulsions against bacteria and yeasts. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 14(2): 223–228. 10.18466/cbayarfbe.403152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Becker K, Stadler M. (2021) Recent progress in biodiversity research on the Xylariales and their secondary metabolism. The Journal of Antibiotics 74(1): 1–23. 10.1038/s41429-020-00376-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker K, Lambert C, Wieschhaus J, Stadler M. (2020) Phylogenetic assignment of the fungicolous Hypoxyloninvadens (Ascomycota, Xylariales) and investigation of its secondary metabolites. Microorganisms 8(9): 1397. 10.3390/microorganisms8091397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bennett Jr JP, Piercey MF. (1999) Pramipexole—A new dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 163(1): 25–31. 10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00307-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Berkeley MJ, Broome CE. (1875) Enumeration of the fungi of Ceylon. Part II, containing the remainder of the Hymenomycetes, with the remaining established tribes of Xylariaceae. The Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany 14: 29–140. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1873.tb00301.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhunjun CS, Niskanen T, Suwannarach N, Wannathes N, Chen YJ, Bhunjun CS, Niskanen T, Suwannarach N, Wannathes N, Chen YJ, McKenzie EHC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Buyck B, Zhao CL, Fan YG, Zhang JY, Dissanayake AJ, Marasinghe DS, Jayawardena RS, Kumla J, Padamsee M, Chen YY, Liimatainen K, Ammirati JF, Phukhamsakda C, Liu JK, Phonrob W, Randrianjohany E, Hongsanan S, Cheewangkoon R, Bundhun D, Khuna S, Yu WJ, Deng LS, Lu YZ, Hyde KD, Lumyong S. (2022) The numbers of fungi: Are the most speciose genera truly diverse? Fungal Diversity 114: 387–462. 10.1007/s13225-022-00501-4 [DOI]
  15. Bhunjun CS, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Saxena RK, Li Q. (2024) Do all fungi have ancestors with endophytic lifestyles? Fungal Diversity 125: 73–98. 10.1007/s13225-023-00516-5 [DOI]
  16. Bitzer J, Læssøe T, Fournier J, Kummer V, Decock C, Tichy HV, Piepenbring M, Persoh D, Stadler M. (2008) Affinities of Phylacia and the daldinoid Xylariaceae, inferred from chemotypes of cultures and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research 112(2): 251–270. 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooks S, Weaver JA, Klomchit A, Alharthi SA, Onlamun T, Nurani R, Vong TK, Alberti F, Greco C. (2024) Unveiling the potential of DaldiniaeschscholtziiMFLUCC 19-0629 through bioactivity and bioinformatics studies for enhanced sustainable agriculture production. Frontiers in Chemical Biology 3: 1362147. 10.3389/fchbi.2024.1362147 [DOI]
  18. Bucher VVC, Hyde KD, Pointing SB, Reddy CA. (2004) Production of wood decay enzymes, loss of mass, and lignin solubilization in wood by diverse tropical freshwater fungi. Fungal Diversity 15: 1–14. 10.1007/s00248-003-0132-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bulliard P. (1791) Histoire des champignons de la France, ou Traité élémentaire renfermant dans un ordre méthodique les descriptionset les figures des champignons qui croissent naturellemnt en France, par M. Bulliard. Vol. 1
  20. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. (2009) trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15): 1972–1973. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cedeño-Sanchez M, Wendt L, Stadler M, Mejía LC. (2020) Three new species of Hypoxylon and new records of Xylariales from Panama. Mycosphere 11(1): 1457–1476. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cedeño-Sanchez M, Charria-Girón E, Lambert C, Luangsa-Ard JJ, Decock C, Franke R, Brönstrup M, Stadler M. (2023) Segregation of the genus Parahypoxylon (Hypoxylaceae, Xylariales) from Hypoxylon by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. MycoKeys 95: 131–162. 10.3897/mycokeys.95.98125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cedeño-Sanchez M, Lambert C, Mejia LC, Ebada SS, Stadler M. (2024) Chemotaxonomic and molecular phylogenetic studies of selected Hypoxylon species from the Neotropics. Mycology, 1–16. 10.1080/21501203.2024.2378071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Cesati V, De Notaris G. (1863) Schema di classificazione degli sferiacei italici aschigeri: Più omeno appartenenti al genere Sphaerianell’antico significato attribuitogli da Persoo. Commentario della Società Crittogamologica Italiana 1: 205.
  25. Chaiwan N, Gomdola D, Wang S, Monkai J, Tibpromma S, Doilom M, Wanasinghe DN, Mortimer PE, Lumyong S, Hyde KD. (2021) an online database providing updated information of microfungi in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycosphere 12(1): 1513–1526. 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chakraborty J, Mondal R, Sultana J, Banerjee S, Mandal AK, Sarkar H. (2024) Repurposing of dibucaine and niflumic acid as antimicrobial agents in combination with antibiotics against Staphylococcusaureus. The Journal of Antibiotics 77(11): 746–756. 10.1038/s41429-024-00759-7 [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Chen W, Yu M, Chen S, Gong T, Xie L, Liu J, Bian C, Huang G, Zheng C. (2024) Structures and biological activities of secondary metabolites from Xylaria spp. Journal of Fungi 10(3): 1–47. 10.3390/jof10030190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cheng MJ, Wu MD, Aung T, Liao HR, Khamthong N, Hsieh SY. (2020) Metabolites from the endophytic fungus Hypoxylonmonticulosum. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 56(6): 1170–1172. 10.1007/s10600-020-03258-x [DOI]
  29. Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2016) Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology 65(6): 997–1008. 10.1093/sysbio/syw037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chethana KWT, Niranjan M, Dong W, Samarakoon MC, Bao DF, Calabon MS, Chaiwan N, Chuankid B, Dayarathne MC, De Silva NI, Devadatha B. (2021a) AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 101–150. Asian Journal of Mycology 4: 113–260. 10.5943/ajom/4/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chethana KWT, Manawasinghe IS, Hurdeal VG, Bhunjun CS, Appadoo MA, Gentekaki E, Raspé O, Promputtha I, Hyde KD. (2021b) What are fungal species and how to delineate them? Fungal Diversity 109(1): 1–25. 10.1007/s13225-021-00483-9 [DOI]
  32. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Hardy G, Crane C, Barrett S, Cano-Lira JF, Le Roux JJ, Thangavel R, Guarro J, Stchigel AM, Martín MP, Alfredo DS, Barber PA, Barreto RW, Baseia IG, Cano-Canals J, Cheewangkoon R, Ferreira RJ, Gené J, Lechat C, Moreno G, Roets F, Shivas RG, Sousa JO, Tan YP, Wiederhold NP, Abell SE, Accioly T, Albizu JL, Alves JL, Antoniolli ZI, Aplin N, Araújo J, Arzanlou M, Bezerra JDP, Bouchara JP, Carlavilla JR, Castillo A, Castroagudín VL, Ceresini PC, Claridge GF, Coelho G, Coimbra VRM, Costa LA, da Cunha KC, da Silva SS, Daniel R, de Beer ZW, Dueñas M, Edwards J, Enwistle P, Fiuza PO, Fournier J, García D, Gibertoni TB, Giraud S, Guevara-Suarez M, Gusmão LFP, Haituk S, Heykoop M, Hirooka Y, Hofmann TA, Houbraken J, Hughes DP, Kautmanová I, Koppel O, Koukol O, Larsson E, Latha KPD, Lee DH, Lisboa DO, Lisboa WS, López-Villalba Á, Maciel JLN, Manimohan P, Manjón JL, Marincowitz S, Marney TS, Meijer M, Miller AN, Olariaga I, Paiva LM, Piepenbring M, Poveda-Molero JC, Raj KNA, Raja HA, Rougeron A, Salcedo I, Samadi R, Santos TAB, Scarlett K, Seifert KA, Shuttleworth LA, Silva GA, Silva M, Siqueira JPZ, Souza-Motta CM, Stephenson SL, Sutton DA, Tamakeaw N, Telleria MT, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Viljoen A, Visagie CM, Vizzini A, Wartchow F, Wingfield BD, Yurchenko E, Zamora JC, Groenewald JZ. (2016) Fungal planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Xylariaceae 37: 218–403. 10.3767/003158516X694499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Chooi YH, Gilchrist CL, Lacey E, Pitt JI, Roets F, Swart WJ, Cano-Lira JF, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Hubka V. (2020) Fungal planet description sheets: 1042–1111. Persoonia. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Xylariaceae 44: 301–459. 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cruz KDS, Lima MC, de Jesus MA, de Souza AQ, Sales-Campos C. (2020) Annulohypoxylon (Hypoxylaceae, Ascomycota) from Amazonian-forest of Brazil, with a description of one new species. New Zealand Journal of Botany 59(2): 267–284. 10.1080/0028825X.2020.1846570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. da Luz Morales M, Almeida LF, de Souza Ladeira Àzar RI, Guimarães VM, Alfenas RF, Maitan-Alfenas GP. (2021) First report on the enzymatic profile of Kretzschmariazonata. 3 Biotech 11: 1–6. 10.1007/s13205-021-02940-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Daranagama DA, Camporesi E, Tian Q, Liu X, Chamyuang S, Stadler M, Hyde KD. (2015) Anthostomella is polyphyletic, comprising several genera in Xylariaceae. Fungal Diversity 73: 203–238. 10.1007/s13225-015-0329-6 [DOI]
  37. Daranagama DA, Jones EBG, Liu XZ, To-anun C, Stadler M, Hyde KD. (2016) Mycosphere Essays 13 — Do xylariaceous macromycetes make up most of the Xylariomycetidae? Mycosphere 7: 582–601. 10.5943/mycosphere/7/5/5 [DOI]
  38. Daranagama DA, Hyde KD, Sir EB, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Samarakoon MC, McKenzie EHC, Jayasiri SC, Tibpromma S, Bhat JD, Liu XZ, Stadler M. (2018) Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Graphostromataceae, Hypoxylaceae, Lopadostomataceae and Xylariaceae. Fungal Diversity 88: 1–165. 10.1007/s13225-017-0388-y [DOI]
  39. Dayarathne MC, Phookamsak R, Hyde KD, Manawasinghe IS, To-anun C, Jones EBG. (2016) Halodiatrype, a novel diatrypaceous genus from mangroves with H.salinicola and H.avicenniae spp. nov. Mycosphere 7: 612–627. 10.5943/mycosphere/7/5/7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dayarathne MC, Wanasinghe DN, Devadatha B, Abeywickrama P, Jones EG, Jones EBG, Chomnunti P, Sarma VV, Hyde KD, Lumyong S, Mckenzie EHC. (2020a) Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne & KD Hyde, gen. nov. Cryptogamie. Mycologie 41(3): 21–67. 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2020v41a3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dayarathne MC, Jones EBG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Devadatha B, Sarma VV, Khongphinitbunjong K, Chomnunti P, Hyde KD. (2020b) Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine-based habitats. Mycosphere 11(1): 1–188. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. de Almeida DAC, Gusmão LFP, Miller AN. (2016) Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae (Ascomycota, Xylariales) species from the Brazilian semi-arid region, including four new species. Mycological Progress 15: 1–27. 10.1007/s11557-016-1194-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. De Long Q, Liu LL, Zhang X, Wen TC, Kang JC, Hyde KD, Shen X, Li Q. (2019) Contributions to species of Xylariales in China-1. Durotheca species. Mycological Progress 18(3): 495–510. 10.1007/s11557-018-1458-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. de Silva NI, Hyde KD, Lumyong S, Phillips AJL, Bhat DJ, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Tennakoon DS, Suwannarach N, Karunarathna SC. (2022) Morphology, phylogeny, host association and geography of fungi associated with plants of Annonaceae, Apocynaceae and Magnoliaceae. Mycosphere 13(1): 955–1076. 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/12 [DOI]
  45. Dissanayake LS, Wijayawardene NN, Dayarathne MC, Samarakoon MC, Dai DQ, Hyde KD, Kang JC. (2021) Paraeutypellaguizhouensis gen. et sp. nov. and Diatrypellalongiasca sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from China. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63864. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Dissanayake LS, Samarakoon MC, Maharachchikumbura SS, Hyde KD, Tang X, Li QR, Mortimer PE, Faraj T, Xu JC, Kang JC, Wanasinghe DN. (2024) Exploring the taxonomy and phylogeny of Sordariomycetes taxa emphasizing Xylariomycetidae in Southwestern China. Mycosphere 15(1): 1675–1793. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eriksson OE, Baral HO, Currah RS, Hansen K, Kurtzman CP, Rambold G, Laessoe T. (2003) Outline of Ascomycota—2003. Myconet 9: 1–89. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fournier J, Köpcke B, Stadler M. (2010a) New species of Hypoxylon from western Europe and Ethiopia. Mycotaxon 113(1): 209–235. 10.5248/113.209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fournier J, Stadler M, Hyde KD, Duong ML. (2010b) The new genus Rostrohypoxylon and two new Annulohypoxylon species from Northern Thailand. Fungal Diversity 40: 23–36. 10.1007/s13225-010-0026-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fournier J, Lechat C, Courtecuisse R. (2016) The genus Hypoxylon (Xylariaceae) in Guadeloupe and Martinique (French West Indies). Ascomycete. Org : Revue Internationale pour la Taxinomie des Ascomycota 7: 145–212. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fournier J, Ju YM, Hsieh HM, Lindermann U. (2018) Xylariaaethiopica sp. nov. — A new pod-inhabiting species of Xylaria (Xylariaceae) from Ethiopia. Ascomycete. Org : Revue Internationale pour la Taxinomie des Ascomycota 10: 209–215. 10.25664/ART-244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fournier J, Lechat C, Van Vooren N, Chaduli D, Favel A. (2024) Preliminary overview of Hypoxylon (Hypoxylaceae, Xylariales) in the vicinity of Saül in French Guiana, with nineteen newly described species. Ascomycete. Org : Revue Internationale pour la Taxinomie des Ascomycota 16(2): 27–128. 10.25664/ART-0388 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Friebes G, Wendelin I. (2016) Studies on Hypoxylonferrugineum (Xylariaceae), a rarely reported species collected in the urban area of Graz (Austria). Ascomycete. Org : Revue Internationale pour la Taxinomie des Ascomycota 8: 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gauchan DP, Vélëz H, Acharya A, Östman JR, Lundén K, Elfstrand M, Garcia-Gil MR. (2021) Annulohypoxylon sp. strain MUS1, an endophytic fungus isolated from Taxuswallichiana Zucc., produces taxol and other bioactive metabolites. 3 Biotech 11: 1–16. 10.1007/s13205-021-02693-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  55. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Glawe A, Jacobs KA. (1987) Taxonomic notes on Eutypellavitis, Cryptosphaeriapopulina, and Diatrypestigma. Mycologia 79: 135–139.
  57. Halecker S, Wennrich JP, Rodrigo S, Andrée N, Rabsch L, Baschien C, Steinert M, Stadler M, Surup F, Schulz B. (2020) Fungal endophytes for biocontrol of ash dieback: The antagonistic potential of Hypoxylonrubiginosum. Fungal Ecology 45: 100918. 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.100918 [DOI]
  58. Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN. (1995) Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Xylariaceae, 8th edn. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
  60. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. (1977) Benzbromarone: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in gout and hyperuricaemia. Drugs 14: 349–366. 10.2165/00003495-197714050-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Helaly SE, Thongbai B, Stadler M. (2018) Diversity of biologically active secondary metabolites from endophytic and saprotrophic fungi of the Ascomycete order Xylariales. Natural Product Reports 35: 992–1014. 10.1039/c8np00010g [DOI] [PubMed]
  62. Hellwig V, Ju YM, Rogers JD, Fournier J, Stadler M. (2005) Hypomiltin, a novel azaphilone from Hypoxylonhypomiltum, and chemotypes in Hypoxylonsect.Hypoxylon as inferred from analytical HPLC profiling. Mycological Progress 4: 39–54. 10.1007/s11557-006-0108-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hennings P. (1902) Xylariaceae blumenaviensis I, a cl. Alfr. Moller lecti. Hedwigia 41: 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  64. Heredia G, Li DW, Wendt L, Réblová M, Arias RM, Gamboa-Angulo M, Štěpánek V, Stadler M, Castañeda-Ruíz RF. (2020) Natonodosaspeciosa gen. et sp. nov. and rediscovery of Poroisariopsisinornata: Neotropical anamorphic fungi in Xylariales. Mycological Progress 19: 15–30. 10.1007/s11557-019-01537-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hsieh HM, Ju YM, Rogers JD. (2005) Molecular phylogeny of Hypoxylon and closely related genera. Mycologia 97(4): 844–865. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hsieh HM, Lin CR, Fang MJ, Rogers JD, Fournier J, Lechat C, Ju YM. (2010) Phylogenetic status of XylariasubgenusPseudoxylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 957–969. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Husbands DR, Urbina H, Lewis SM, Aime MC. (2018) Xylariakaryophthora: A new seed-inhabiting fungus of Greenheart from Guyana. Mycologia 110(2): 434–447. 10.1080/00275514.2018.1457349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui BK, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, de Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Góes-Neto A, Huang SK, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li WJ, Lin CG, Liu JK, Lu YZ, Luo ZL, Manawasinghe IS, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, Santiago ALCMDA, Drechsler-Santos ER, Senanayake IC, Tanaka K, Tennakoon TMDS, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Thongbai B, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Wu HX, Yang J, Zeng XY, Zhang H, Zhang JF, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Bahkali AH, Amoozegar MA, Araujo-Neta LS, Ammirati JF, Baghela A, Bhatt RP, Bojantchev D, Buyck B, Gladstone Alves da Silva GA, de Lima CLF, de Oliveira RJV, de Souza CAF, Dai YC, Dima B, Duong TT, Ercole E, Mafalda-Freire F, Ghosh A, Hashimoto A, Kamolhan S, Kang JC, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kytövuori I, Lantieri A, Liimatainen K, Liu ZY, Liu XZ, Lücking R, Medardi G, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Promputtha I, Raj KNA, Reck MA, Lumyong S, Shahzadeh-Fazeli SA, Stadler M, Soudi MR, Su HY, Takahashi T, Tangthirasunun N, Uniyal P, Wang Y, Wen TC, Xu JC, Zhang ZK, Zhao YC, Zhou JL, Zhu L. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. 10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Chen J, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Perera RH, Thongbai B, Wanasinghe DN, Wisitrassameewong K, Tibpromma S, Stadler M. (2018) Thailand’s amazing diversity: Up to 96% of fungi in northern Thailand may be novel. Fungal Diversity 93: 215–239. 10.1007/s13225-018-0415-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hyde KD, Tennakoon DS, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Rossi W, Leonardi M, Lee HB, Mun HY, Houbraken J, Nguyen TTT, Jeon SJ, Frisvad JC, Wanasinghe DN, Lücking R, Aptroot A, Cáceres MES, Karunarathna SC, Hongsanan S, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Jayawardena RS, Senanayake IC, Boonmee S, Chen J, Luo ZL, Phukhamsakda C, Pereira OL, Abreu VP, Rosado AWC, Bart B, Randrianjohany E, Hofstetter V, Gibertoni TB, Soares AMDS, Plautz Jr HL, Sotão HMP, Xavier WKS, Bezerra JDP, de Oliveira TGL, de Souza-Motta CM, Magalhães OMC, Bundhun D, Harishchandra D, Manawasinghe IS, Dong W, Zhang SN, Bao DF, Samarakoon MC, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Lin CG, Yang J, Perera RH, Kumar V, Huang SK, Dayarathne MC, Ekanayaka AH, Jayasiri SC, Xiao Y, Konta S, Niskanen T, Liimatainen K, Dai YC, Ji XH, Tian XM, Mešić A, Singh SK, Phutthacharoen K, Cai L, Sorvongxay T, Thiyagaraja V, Norphanphoun C, Chaiwan N, Lu YZ, Jiang HB, Zhang JF, Abeywickrama PD, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Brahmanage RS, Zeng M, Chethana T, Wei D, Réblová M, Fournier J, Nekvindová J, Barbosa RDN, dos Santos JEF, de Oliveira NT, Li GJ, Ertz D, Shang QJ, Phillips AJL, Kuo CH, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Lumyong S, Jones EBG, Chomnunti P, Gentekaki E, Bungartz F, Zeng XY, Fryar S, Tkalčec Z, Liang J, Li G, Wen TC, Singh PN, Gafforov Y, Promputtha I, Yasanthika E, Goonasekara ID, Zhao RL, Zhao Q, Kirk PM, Liu JK, Yan JY, Mortimer PE, Xu J, Doilom M. (2019) Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 96: 1–242. 10.1007/s13225-019-00429-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hyde D, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Jones EBG, Liu NG, Abeywickrama PD, Mapook A, Wei DP. (2020a) Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 100: 5–277. 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura S, Bhat DJ, Jones EBG, Bundhun D, Chen YJ, Bao D-F, Boonmee S, Calabon M, Chaiwan N, Chethana KWT, Dai D-Q, Dayarathne MC, Devadatha B, Dissanayake AJ, Dissanayake LS, Doilom M, Dong W, Zhang S, Fan X, Goonasekara ID, Hongsanan S, Huang SK, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Karunarathna A, Konta S, Kumar V, Lin CG, Liu J-K, Liu NG, Luangsa-ard J, Lumyong S, Luo ZL, Marasinghe DS, McKenzie EHC, Niego AGT, Niranjan M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Rathnayaka A, Samarakoon MC, Samarakoon S, Sarma VV, Senanayake IC, Shang QJ, Stadler M, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN, Wei D, Wijayawardene NN, Xiao YP, Yang J, Zeng XY, Xiang MM. (2020b) Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11: 305–1059. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7 [DOI]
  73. Hyde KD, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja V, He MQ, Johnston PR, Wijesinghe SN, Armand A, Biketova AY, Chethana KWT, Erdoğdu M, Ge ZW, Groenewald JZ, Hongsanan S, Kušan I, Leontyev DV, Li DW, Lin CG, Liu NG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Matočec N, May TW, McKenzie EHC, Mešić A, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Piątek M, Samarakoon MC, Selcuk F, Senanayake IC, Tanney JB, Tian Q, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wannasawang N, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdollahzadeh J, Abeywickrama PD, Abhinav Absalan S, Acharya K, Afshari N, Afshan NS, Afzalinia S, Ahmadpour SA, Akulov O, Alizadeh A, Alizadeh M, Al-Sadi AM, Alves A, Alves VCS, Alves-Silva G, Antonín V, Aouali S, Aptroot A, Apurillo CCS, Arias RM, Asgari B, Asghari R, Assis DMA, Assyov B, Atienza V, Aumentado HDR, Avasthi S, Azevedo E, Bakhshi M, Bao DF, Baral HO, Barata M, Barbosa KD, Barbosa RN, Barbosa FR, Baroncelli R, Barreto GG, Baschien C, Bennett RM, Bera I, Bezerra JDP, Bhunjun CS, Bianchinotti MV, Błaszkowski J, Boekhout T, Bonito GM, Boonmee S, Boonyuen N, Bortnikov FM, Bregant C, Bundhun D, Burgaud G, Buyck B, Caeiro MF, Cabarroi-Hernández M, Cai M Feng, Cai L, Calabon MS, Calaça FJS, Callalli M, Câmara MPS, Cano-Lira J, Cao B, Carlavilla JR, Carvalho A, Carvalho TG, Castañeda-Ruiz RF, Catania MDV, Cazabonne J, Cedeño-Sanchez M, Chaharmiri-Dokhaharani S, Chaiwan N, Chakraborty N, Cheewankoon R, Chen C, Chen J, Chen Q, Chen YP, Chinaglia S, Coelho-Nascimento CC, Coleine C, CostaRezende DH, Cortés-Pérez A, Crouch JA, Crous PW, Cruz RHSF, Czachura P, Damm U, Darmostuk V, Daroodi Z, Das K, Das K, Davoodian N, Davydov EA, da Silva GA, da IR, da Silva Silva RMF, da Silva Santos AC, Dai DQ, Dai YC, de Groot Michiel D, De Kesel A, De Lange R, de Medeiros EV, de Souza CFA, de Souza FA, dela Cruz TEE, Decock C, Delgado G, Denchev CM, Denchev TT, Deng YL, Dentinger BTM, Devadatha B, Dianese JC, Dima B, Doilom M, Dissanayake AJ, Dissanayake DMLS, Dissanayake LS, Diniz AG, Dolatabadi S, Dong JH, Dong W, Dong ZY, Drechsler-Santos ER, Druzhinina IS, Du TY, Dubey MK, Dutta AK, Elliott TF, Elshahed MS, Egidi E, Eisvand P, Fan L, Fan X, Fan XL, Fedosova AG, Ferro LO, Fiuza PO, Flakus A, W. Fonseca EO, Fryar SC, Gabaldón T, Gajanayake AJ, Gannibal PB, Gao F, GarcíaSánchez D, García-Sandoval R, Garrido-Benavent I, Garzoli L, Gasca-Pineda J, Gautam AK, Gené J, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Ghosh A, Giachini AJ, Gibertoni TB, Gentekaki E, Gmoshinskiy VI, GóesNeto A, Gomdola D, Gorjón SP, Goto BT, Granados-Montero MM, Griffith GW, Groenewald M, Grossart H-P, Gu ZR, Gueidan C, Gunarathne A, Gunaseelan S, Guo SL, Gusmão LFP, Gutierrez AC, Guzmán-Dávalos L, Haelewaters D, Haituk H, Halling RE, He SC, Heredia G, HernándezRestrepo M, Hosoya T, Hoog SD, Horak E, Hou CL, Houbraken J, Htet ZH, Huang SK, Huang WJ, Hurdeal VG, Hustad VP, Inácio CA, Janik P, Jayalal RGU, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Jerônimo GH, Jin J, Jones EBG, Joshi Y, Jurjević Ž, Justo A, Kakishima M, Kaliyaperumal M, Kang GP, Kang JC, Karimi O, Karunarathna SC, Karpov SA, Kezo K, Khalid AN, Khan MK, Khuna S, Khyaju S, Kirchmair M, Klawonn I, Kraisitudomsook N, Kukwa M, Kularathnage ND, Kumar S, Lachance MA, Lado C, Latha KPD, Lee HB, Leonardi M, Lestari AS, Li C, Li H. Li J, Li Q, Li Y, Li YC, Li YX, Liao CF, Lima JLR, Lima JMS, Lima NB, Lin L, Linaldeddu BT, Linn MM, Liu F, Liu JK, Liu JW, Liu S, Liu SL, Liu XF, Liu XY, Longcore JE, Luangharn T, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lu L, Lu YZ, Lumbsch HT, Luo L, Luo M, Luo ZL, Ma J, Madagammana AD, Madhushan A, Madrid H, Magurno F, Magyar D, Mahadevakumar S, Malosso E, Malysh JM, Mamarabadi M, Manawasinghe IS, Manfrino RG, Manimohan P, Mao N, Mapook A, Marchese P, Marasinghe DS, Mardones M, Marin-Felix Y, Masigol H, Mehrabi M, MehrabiKoushki M, Meiras-Ottoni A de, Melo RFR, Mendes-Alvarenga RL, Mendieta S, Meng QF, Menkis A, Menolli Jr N, Mikšík M, Miller SL, Moncada B, Moncalvo JM, Monteiro JS, Monteiro M, Mora-Montes HM, Moroz EL, Moura JC, Muhammad U, Mukhopadhyay S, Nagy GL, Najam ul Sehar A, Najafiniya M, Nanayakkara CM, Naseer A, Nascimento ECR, Nascimento SS, Neuhauser S, Neves MA, Niazi AR, Nie Yong, Nilsson RH, Nogueira PTS, Novozhilov YK, Noordeloos M, Norphanphoun C, Nuñez Otaño N, O’Donnell RP, Oehl F, Oliveira JA, Oliveira Junior I, Oliveira NVL, Oliveira PHF, Orihara T, Oset M, Pang KL, Papp V, Pathirana LS, Peintner U, Pem D, Pereira OL, Pérez-Moreno J, Pérez-Ortega S, Péter G, Pires-Zottarelli CLA, Phonemany M, Phongeun S, Pošta A, Prazeres JFSA, Quan Y, Quandt CA, Queiroz MB, Radek R, Rahnama K, Raj KNA, Rajeshkumar KC, Rajwar Soumyadeep, Ralaiveloarisoa AB, Rämä T, Ramírez-Cruz V, Rambold G, Rathnayaka AR, Raza M, Ren GC, Rinaldi AC, Rivas-Ferreiro M, Robledo GL, Ronikier A, Rossi W, Rusevska K, Ryberg M, Safi A, Salimi F, Salvador-Montoya CA, Samant B, Samaradiwakara NP, Sánchez-Castro I, Sandoval-Denis M, Santiago ALCMA, Santos ACDS, Santos LA dos, Sarma VV, Sarwar S., Savchenko A, Savchenko K, Saxena RK, Schoutteten N, Selbmann L, Ševčíková H, Sharma A, Shen HW, Shen YM, Shu YX, Silva HF, Silva-Filho AGS, Silva VSH, Simmons DR, Singh R, Sir EB, Sohrabi M, Souza FA, Souza-Motta CM, Sriindrasutdhi V, Sruthi OP, Stadler M, Stemler J, Stephenson SL, Stoyneva-Gaertner MP, Strassert JFH, Stryjak-Bogacka M, Su H, Sun YR, Svantesson S, Sysouphanthong P, Takamatsu S, Tan TH, Tanaka K, Tang C, Tang X, Taylor JE, Taylor PWJ, Tennakoon DS, Thakshila SAD, Thambugala KM, Thamodini GK, Thilanga D, Thines M, Tiago PV, Tian XG, Tian WH, Tibpromma S, Tkalčec Z, Tokarev YS, Tomšovský M, Torruella G, Tsurykau A, Udayanga D, Ulukapı M, Untereiner WA, Usman M, Uzunov BA, Vadthanarat S, Valenzuela R, Van den Wyngaert S, Van Vooren N, Velez P, Verma RK, Vieira LC, Vieira WAS, Vinzelj JM, Tang AMC, Walker A, Walker AK, Wang QM, Wang Y, Wang XY, Wang ZY, Wannathes N, Wartchow F, Weerakoon G, Wei DP, Wei X, White JF, Wijesundara DSA, Wisitrassameewong K, Worobiec G, Wu HX, Wu N, Xiong YR, Xu B, Xu JP, Xu R, Xu RF, Xu RJ, Yadav S, Yakovchenko LS, Yang HD, Yang X, Yang YH, Yang Y, Yang YY, Yoshioka R, Youssef Noha H, Yu FM, Yu ZF, Yuan LL, Yuan Q, Zabin DA, Zamora JC, Zapata CV, Zare R, Zeng M, Zeng XY, Zhang JF, Zhang JY, Zhang S, Zhang XC, Zhao CL, Zhao H, Zhao Q, Zhao H, Zhao HJ, Zhou HM, Zhu XY, Zmitrovich IV, Zucconi L, Zvyagina E. (2024) The 2024 Outline of Xylariaceae and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15(1): 5146–6239. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Index Fungorum (2025) Index Fungorum. http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/Names.asp [accessed 10 August 2024]
  75. Inno Specialty Chemicals (2017) Manufacturer of N-{[Dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]oxy}methyl}aniline: Synthesis and market prospects. https://www.innospk.com/en/?news/PKL-manufacturer-of-n-dimethoxymethylsilyloxymethylaniline-synthesis-and-market-prospects [Retrieved February 20, 2025]
  76. Jaklitsch WM, Voglmayr H. (2012) Phylogenetic relationships of five genera of Xylariales and Rosasphaeria gen. nov. (Hypocreales). Fungal Diversity 52: 75–98. 10.1007/s13225-011-0104-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai YC, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu JK, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo JM, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang KL, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen TC, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li WJ, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Zhao Q, Kang JC, Promputtha I. (2015) The Faces of Fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74: 3–18. 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Wang S, Sun YR, Suwannarach N, Sysouphanthong P, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abeywickrama PD, Abreu VP, Armand A, Aptroot A, Bao DF, Begerow D, Bellanger JM, Bezerra JDP, Bundhun D, Calabon MS, Cao T, Cantillo T, Carvalho JLVR, Chaiwan N, Chen CC, Courtecuisse R, Cui BK, Damm U, Denchev CM, Denchev TT, Deng CY, Devadatha B, de Silva NI, dos Santos LA, Dubey NK, Dumez S, Ferdinandez HS, Firmino AL, Gafforov Y, Gajanayake AJ, Gomdola D, Gunaseelan S, He S, Htet ZH, Kaliyaperumal M, Kemler M, Kezo K, Kularathnage ND, Leonardi M, Li JP, Liao C, Liu S, Loizides M, Luangharn T, Ma J, Madrid H, Mahadevakumar S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Manamgoda DS, Martín MP, Mekala N, Moreau PA, Mu YH, Pahoua P, Pem D, Pereira OL, Phonrob W, Phukhamsakda C, Raza M, Ren GC, Rinaldi AC, Rossi W, Samarakoon BC, Samarakoon MC, Sarma VV, Senanayake IC, Singh A, Souza MF, Souza-Motta CM, Spielmann AA, Su W, Tang X, Tian XG, Thambugala KM, Thongklang N, Tennakoon DS, Wannathes N, Wei DP, Welti S, Wijesinghe SN, Yang H, Yang Y, Yuan HS, Zhang H, Zhang J, Balasuriya A, Bhunjun CS, Bulgakov TS, Cai L, Camporesi E, Chomnunti P, Deepika YS, Doilom M, Duan WJ, Han SL, Huanraluek N, Jones EBG, Lakshmidevi N, Li Y, Lumyong S, Luo ZL, Khuna S, Kumla J, Manawasinghe IS, Mapook A, Punyaboon W, Tibpromma S, Lu YZ, Yan JY, Wang Y. (2022) Fungal diversity notes 1512–1610: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 117(1): 1–272. 10.1007/s13225-022-00513-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jin Y, Wu H, Zhongzhu P, Yan X, Wang B, Zheng YL, Feng XX. (2024) First report of Monosporascuscannonballus causing Root rot and vine decline in Watermelon (Citrulluslanatus) in China. Plant Disease 108(4): 1111. 10.1094/PDIS-10-23-2065-PDN [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Johansen R, Johnston PR. (2011) Xylariaceous fungal endophytes: evidence for a ‘leaf only’ clade. Dissertation, Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland.
  81. Ju YM, Rogers JD. (1990) Astrocystis reconsidered. Mycologia 82: 342–349. 10.1080/00275514.1990.12025889 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ju YM, Rogers JD. (1996) A revision of the genus Hypoxylon. Mycologia Memoir No. 20. APS Press, St. Paul, 365 pp. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ju YM, Rogers JD, Hsieh HM. (2018) Xylaria species associated with fallen fruits and seeds. Mycologia 110(4): 726–749. 10.1080/00275514.2018.1469879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Karimi O, Chethana KWT, Farias ARG, Li QR. (2023) Two new records of Xylariales species from Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 598(3): 187–205. 10.11646/phytotaxa.598.3.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Karimi O, Afshari N, Asghari R, Li Q, Chethana KT, Hyde KD, Alotibi FO. (2024) Novel discoveries of Xylariomycetidae (Ascomycota) taxa from peat swamp forests and other terrestrial habitats in Thailand. MycoKeys 107: 219. 10.3897/mycokeys.107.127749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  86. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ke T, Anhong Z, Zikun S, Li Y, Haixa M. (2024) Three new records of Annulohypoxylon from Hainan Province of China. Redai Zuowu Xuebao 45(8): 1605–1612. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2024.08.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kemnic TR, Coleman M. (2022) Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole. [Updated 2022 Nov 28]. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island. [PubMed]
  89. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. (2008) Dictionary of the Xylariaceae. 10th edn. CAB International, Wallingford.
  90. Klaysuban A, Sakayaroj J, Jones EBG. (2014) An additional marine fungal lineage in the Diatrypaceae, Xylariales: Pedumisporarhizophorae. Botanica Marina 57(5): 413–420. 10.1515/bot-2014-0017 [DOI]
  91. Konta S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Xu JC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Daranagama DA, McKenzie EHC, Boonmee S, Tibpromma S, Eungwanichayapant PD, Samarakoon MC. (2020a) Polyphyletic genera in Xylariaceae (Xylariales): Neoxylaria gen. nov. and Stilbohypoxylon. Mycosphere 11(1): 2629–2651. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/17 [DOI]
  92. Konta S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Senanayake IC, McKenzie EHC, Stadler M, Boonmee S, Phookamsak R, Jayawardena RS, Senwanna C, Hyde KD, Elgorban AM, Eungwanichayapant PD. (2020b) A new genus Allodiatrype, five new species and a new host record of diatrypaceous fungi from palms (Arecaceae). Mycosphere 11(1): 239–268. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Konta S, Hyde KD, Eungwanichayapant PD, Karunarathna SC, Samarakoon MC, Xu J, Dauner LA, Aluthwattha ST, Lumyong S, Tibpromma S. (2021) Multigene phylogeny reveals Haploanthostomellaelaeidis gen. et sp. nov. and familial replacement of Endocalyx (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). Life 11(6): 486. 10.3390/life11060486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kuhnert E, Fournier J, Peršoh D, Luangsa-ard JJD, Stadler M. (2014a) New Hypoxylon species from Martinique and new evidence on the molecular phylogeny of Hypoxylon based on ITS rDNA and β-tubulin data. Fungal Diversity 64: 181–203. 10.1007/s13225-013-0264-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kuhnert E, Heitkämper S, Fournier J, Surup F, Stadler M. (2014b) Hypoxyvermelhotins A–C, new pigments from Hypoxylonlechatii sp. nov. Fungal Biology 118(2): 242–252. 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kuhnert E, Surup F, Sir EB, Lambert C, Hyde KD, Hladki AII, Romero AI, Stadler M. (2015) Lenormandins A—G, new azaphilones from Hypoxylonlenormandii and Hypoxylonjaklitschii sp. nov., recognised by chemotaxonomic data. Fungal Diversity 71: 165–184. 10.1007/s13225-014-0318-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kuhnert E, Sir EB, Lambert C, Hyde KD, Hladki AI, Romero AI, Rohde M, Stadler M. (2017) Phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic resolution of the genus Annulohypoxylon (Xylariaceae) including four new species. Fungal Diversity 85: 1–43. 10.1007/s13225-016-0377-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Kuhnert E, Navarro-Muñoz JC, Becker K, Stadler M, Collemare J, Cox RJ. (2021) Secondary metabolite biosynthetic diversity in the fungal family Hypoxylaceae and Xylariahypoxylon. Studies in Mycology 99: 100118. 10.1016/j.simyco.2021.100118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  99. Kusumah D, Wakui M, Murakami M, Xie X, Yukihito K, Maeda I. (2020) Linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, and monolinolenins as antibacterial substances in the heat-processed soybean fermented with Rhizopusoligosporus. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 84(6): 1285–1290. 10.1080/09168451.2020.1731299 [DOI] [PubMed]
  100. Læssøe T, Spooner BM. (1993) Rosellinia & Astrocystis (Xylariaceae): New species and generic concepts. Kew Bulletin 49(1): 1–70. 10.2307/4110199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lambert C, Wendt L, Hladki AI, Stadler M, Sir EB. (2019) Hypomontagnella (Hypoxylaceae): A new genus segregated from Hypoxylon by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Mycological Progress 18: 187–201. 10.1007/s11557-018-1452-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lambert C, Pourmoghaddam MJ, Cedeño-Sanchez M, Surup F, Khodaparast SA, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Voglmayr H, Stradal TEB, Stadler M, et al. (2021) Resolution of the Hypoxylonfuscum complex (Hypoxylaceae, Xylariales) and discovery and biological characterization of two of its prominent secondary metabolites. Journal of Fungi 7(2): 131. 10.3390/jof7020131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lee JW, Seo CW, Lee W, Kim JS, Park KH, Cho Y, Lim YW. (2023) Diversity and dynamics of marine arenicolous fungi in three seaside of the Korean peninsula. Journal of Microbiology 61(1): 63–82. 10.1007/s12275-023-00011-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Li QR, Kang JC, Hyde KD. (2015) Two new species of the genus Collodiscula (Xylariaceae) from China. Mycological Progress 14: 1–11. 10.1007/s11557-015-1075-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Li GJ, Hyde KD, Zhao RL, Hongsanan S, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Alvarado P, Alves-Silva G, Ammirati JF, Ariyawansa HA, Baghela A, Bahkali AH, Beug M, Bhat DJ, Bojantchev D, Boonpratuang T, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Boro MC, Ceska O, Chakraborty D, Chen JJ, Chethana KWT, Chomnunti P, Consiglio G, Cui BK, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, Crop ED, Oliveira RJVD, de Souza CAF, José I, de Souza JI, Dentinger BTM, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Drechsler-Santos ER, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Gilmore SP, Góes-Neto A, Gorczak M, Haitjema CH, Hapuarachchi KK, Hashimoto A, He MQ, Henske JK, Hirayama K, Iribarren MJ, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Jeon SJ, Jerônimo GH, Jesus AL, Jones EBG, Kang JC, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Konta S, Kuhnert E, Langer E, Lee HS, Lee HB, Li WJ, Li XH, Liimatainen K, Lima DX, Lin CG, Liu JK, Liu XZ, Liu ZY, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lücking R, Lumbsch HT, Lumyong S, Leaño EM, Marano AV, Matsumura M, McKenzie EHC, Mongkolsamrit S, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, O’Malley MA, Parnmen S, Pawłowska J, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Pires-Zottarelli CLA, Raspé O, Reck MA, Rocha SCO, Santiago ALCMAD, Senanayake IC, Setti L, Shang QJ, Singh SK, Sir EB, Solomon KV, Song J, Srikitikulchai P, Stadler M, Suetrong S, Takahashi H, Takahashi T, Tanaka K, Tang LP, Thambugala KM, Thanakitpipattana D, Theodorou MK, Thongbai B, Thummarukcharoen T, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Verbeken A, Vizzini A, Vlasák J, Voigt K, Wanasinghe DN, Wang Y, Weerakoon G, Wen HA, Wen TC, Wijayawardene NN, Wongkanoun S, Wrzosek M, Xiao YP, Xu JC, Yan JY, Yang J, Yang SD, Hu Y, Zhang JF, Zhao J, Zhou LW, Peršoh D, Phillips AJL, Maharachchikumbura SSN. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 253–366; taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 78: 1–237. 10.1007/s13225-016-0366-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Li Q, Liu L, Zhang X, Shen X, Kang J. (2017) Xylariaspinulosa sp. nov. and X.strosphaerica from China. Mycosphere 8: 1070–1079. 10.5943/mycosphere/8/8/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. Li WJ, McKenzie EH, Liu JK, Bhat DJ, Dai DQ, Camporesi E, Tian Q, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Luo ZL, Shang QJ, Zhang JF, Tangthirasunun N, Karunarathna SC, Xu JC, Hyde KD. (2020) Taxonomy and phylogeny of hyaline-spored coelomycetes. Fungal Diversity 100: 279–801. 10.1007/s13225-020-00440-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Li XH, Wu HX, Li JC, Song JY, Wang Q, Promputtha I, Wijayawardene NN. (2022a) Two new species of Allodiatrype from monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Pu’er, Yunnan, China. Warasan Khana Witthayasat Maha Witthayalai Chiang Mai 49: 565–580. 10.12982/CMJS.2022.047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Li QR, Wu YP, Pi YH, Long SH, Wijayawardene NN, Suwannarach N, Liu LL. (2022b) Two new species and a new record of Astrocystis from Southwestern China. MycoAsia : Journal of Modern Mycology 1(1): 1–18. 10.59265/mycoasia.2022-08 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Li QR, Long SH, Lin Y, Wu YP, Wu QZ, Hu HM, Shen XC, Zhang X, Wijayawardene NN, Kang JC, Kumla J, Kang YQ. (2023) Diversity, morphology, and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae from southern China. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1140190. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1140190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  111. Li QR, Habib K, Long SH, Wu YP, Zhang X, Hu HM, Wu QZ, Liu LL, Zhou SX, Shen XC, Kang JC. (2024) Unveiling fungal diversity in China: New species and records within the Xylariaceae. Mycosphere 15(1): 275–364. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/2 [DOI]
  112. Liu Y, Whelen S, Hall B. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16(12): 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Liu JK, Hyde KD, Gareth EBG, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat DJ, Boonmee S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Shenoy BD, Abdel-Wahab MA, Buyck B, Chen J, Chethana KWT, Singtripop C, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, D’souza MJ, Fan XL, Goonasekara ID, Hirayama K, Hongsanan S, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Karunarathna SC, Li WJ, Mapook A, Norphanphoun C, Pang KL, Perera RH, Peršoh D, Pinruan U, Senanayake IC, Somrithipol S, Suetrong S, Tanaka K, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Udayanga D, Wijayawardene NN, Wanasinghe D, Wisitrassameewong K, Zeng XY, Abdel-Aziz FA, Adamčík S, Bahkali AH, Boonyuen N, Bulgakov T, Callac P, Chomnunti P, Greiner K, Hashimoto A, Hofstetter V, Kang JC, Lewis D, Li XH, Liu XZ, Liu ZY, Matsumura M, Mortimer PE, Rambold G, Randrianjohany E, Sato G, Sri-Indrasutdhi V, Tian CM, Verbeken A, Brackel WV, Wang Y, Wen TC, Xu JC, Yan JY, Zhao RL, Camporesi E. (2015) Fungal diversity notes 1–110: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Diversity 72: 1–197. 10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Liu SL, Zhao P, Cai L, Shen S, Wei HW, Na Q, Han M, Wei R, Ge Y, Ma H, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Zhang B, Dai D, Lin L, Fan XL, Luo ZL, Shen HW, Lu L, Lu W, Xu RF, Tohtirjap A, Wu F, Zhou LW. (2025) Catalogue of fungi in China 1. New taxa of plant-inhabiting fungi. Mycology 16(1): 1–58. 10.1080/21501203.2024.2316066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Long S, Liu L, Pi Y, Wu Y, Lin Y, Zhang X, Long Q, Kang Y, Kang J, Wijayawardene NN, Wang F. (2021) New contributions to Diatrypaceae from karst areas in China. MycoKeys 83: 1–37. 10.3897/mycokeys.83.68926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Łowicki D, Huczyński A. (2013) Structure and antimicrobial properties of monensin A and its derivatives: Summary of the achievements. BioMed Research International 2013(1): 742149. 10.3158/1557.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM. (2010) Myconet volume 14 part one. Outline of ascomycota—2009. Fieldiana. Life and Earth Sciences 1: 1–922. [Google Scholar]
  118. Luque J, Garcia-Figueres F, Legorburu FJ, Muruamendiaraz A, Armengol J, Trouillas F. (2012) Species of Diatrypaceae associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Eastern Spain. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 51(3): 528–540. 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-9953 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Lynch SC, Eskalen A, Zambino PJ, Mayorquin JS, Wang DH. (2013) Identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with coast live oak (Quercusagrifolia) decline in southern California. Mycologia 105(1): 125–140. 10.3852/12-047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ma H, Song Z, Pan X, Li Y, Yang Z, Qu Z. (2022a) Multi-gene phylogeny and taxonomy of Hypoxylon (Hypoxylaceae, Ascomycota) from China. Diversity 14(1): 1–17. 10.3390/d14010037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Ma H, Song Z, Pan X, Qu Z, Yang Z, Li Y, Zhu A. (2022b) Four new pale-spored species of Xylaria (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) with a key to worldwide species on fallen fruits and seeds. Biology 11(6): 1–17. 10.3390/biology11060885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Ma HX, Yang ZE, Song ZK, Qu Z, Li Y, Zhu AH. (2023) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Diatrypaceae from southeastern Tibet in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1073548. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  123. Maciel OMC, Tavares RSN, Caluz DRE, Gaspar LR, Debonsi HM. (2018) Photoprotective potential of metabolites isolated from algae-associated fungi Annulohypoxylonstygium. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B, Biology 178: 316–322. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Maharachchikumbura SS, Wanasinghe DN, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie SS, Kazerooni EA, Cheewangkoon R. (2022) Brunneosporopsisyunnanensis gen. et sp. nov. and Allocryptovalsaxishuangbanica sp. nov., new terrestrial Sordariomycetes from Southwest China. Life 12(5): 1–14. 10.3390/life12050635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Mapook A, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Bhat DJ, Jeewon R, Stadler M, Samarakoon MC, Malaithong M, Tanunchai B, Buscot F, Wubet T, Purahong W. (2020) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaenaodorata (Siam weed). Fungal Diversity 101: 1–175. 10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Mehrabi M, Hemmati R, Vasilyeva LN, Trouillas FP. (2015) A new species and a new record of Diatrypaceae from Iran. Mycosphere 6(1): 60–68. 10.5943/mycosphere/6/1/7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Mehrabi M, Hemmati R, Vasilyeva LN, Trouillas FP. (2016) Diatrypellamacrospora sp. nov. and new records of diatrypaceous fungi from Iran. Phytotaxa 252: 43–55. 10.11646/phytotaxa.252.1.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Mehrabi M, Asgari B, Hemmati R. (2019) Two new species of Eutypella and a new combination in the genus Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae). Mycological Progress 18: 1057–1069. 10.1007/s11557-019-01503-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Meng Q, Wang X, Huang X, Li C, Yu Z, Li P, Liu X, Wen Z. (2024) Repurposing Benzbromarone as an antibacterial agent against gram-positive bacteria. ACS Infectious Diseases Journal 10(12): 4208–4221. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Mishra R, Kushveer JS, Majumder D, Sarma VV. (2020) Stimulation of secondary metabolite production in Hypoxylonanthochroum by naturally occurring epigenetic modifiers. Food Measurements and Characterization 14: 946–962. 10.1007/s11694-019-00345-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. Mushrooms. From the Taunus to Saarland (2020) Taunus mushroom - image database. http://www.taunuspilz.de/coppermine/displayimage.php?pid=9376
  132. Nannfeldt JA. (1932) Studien uber die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis Ser. IV 8: 1–368. [Google Scholar]
  133. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025a) PubChem Compound Summary for CID 66672, 5-Amino-2-(p-toluidino)benzenesulphonic acid. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5-Amino-2-_ptoluidino_benzenesulphonic-acid [Retrieved February 17, 2025]
  134. Fungorum S (2024) Species Fungorum. https://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp [accessed 29 August 2024]
  135. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025b) PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5282032, 10-Deoxymethymycin. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10-Deoxymethymycin [Retrieved February 20, 2025]
  136. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025c) PubChem Compound Summary for CID 9925886, Spisulosine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Spisulosine [Retrieved February 20, 2025]
  137. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025d) PubChem Compound Summary for CID 8467, Ethyl Vanillin. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Ethyl-Vanillin [Retrieved February 20, 2025]
  138. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025e) . PubChem Compound Summary for CID 6635, Chlorfenson. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Chlorfenson [Retrieved February 20, 2025]
  139. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025f) . PubChem Compound Summary for CID 65344, Neomycin Palmitate. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Neomycin-Palmitate [Retrieved April 1, 2025]
  140. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2025g) . PubChem Compound Summary for CID 656958, Tiamulin. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Tiamulin [Retrieved April 1, 2025]
  141. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Nylander JAA. (2004) MrModeltest 2.0. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 2–4.
  143. O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 103–116. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Okane I, Toyama K, Nakagiri A, Suzuki KI, Srikitikulchai P, Sivichai S, Hywel-Jones N, Potacharoen W, Læssøe T. (2008) Study of endophytic Xylariaceae in Thailand: Diversity and taxonomy inferred from rDNA sequence analyses with saprobes forming fruit bodies in the field. Mycoscience 49(6): 359–372. 10.1007/S10267-008-0440-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Pereira J, Rogers JD, Bezerra JL. (2009) New Annulohypoxylon species from Brazil. Mycologia 102(1): 248–252. 10.3852/09-116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Perera RH, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Stadler M, Lee HB, Samarakoon MC, Ekanayaka AH, Camporesi E, Liu JK, Liu ZY. (2020) Xylariaceae on wild seeds and fruits. Mycosphere 11(1): 2108–2480. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Peršoh D, Melcher M, Graf K, Fournie J, Stadler M, Rambold G. (2009) Molecular and morphological evidence for the delimitation of Xylariahypoxylon. Mycologia 101(2): 256–268. 10.3852/08-108 [DOI] [PubMed]
  148. Petrini LE. (2004) A revision of the genus Stilbohypoxylon (Xylariaceae). Sydowia 56: 51–71. [Google Scholar]
  149. Phukhamsakda C, McKenzie EH, Phillips AJ, Jones EBG, Bhat JD, Stadler M, Bhunjun CS, Wanasinghe DN, Thongbai B, Camporesi E, Ertz D, Jayawardena RS, Perera RH, Ekanayake AH, Tibpromma S, Doilom M, Xu J, Hyde KD. (2020) Microfungi associated with Clematis (Ranunculaceae) with an integrated approach to delimiting species boundaries. Fungal Diversity 102: 1–203. 10.1007/s13225-020-00448-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Phukhamsakda C, Nilsson RH, Bhunjun CS, de Farias AR, Sun YR, Wijesinghe SN, Raza M, Bao DF, Lu L, Tibpromma S, Dong W, Tennakoon DS, Tian XG, Xiong YR, Karunarathna SC, Cai L, Luo ZL, Wang Y, Manawasinghe IS, Camporesi E, Kirk PM, Promputtha I, Kuo CH, Su HY, Doilom M, Li Y, Fu YP, Hyde KD. (2022) The numbers of fungi: Contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding. Fungal Diversity 114(1): 327–386. 10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Pi YH, Zhang X, Liu LL, Long QD, Shen XC, Kang YQ, Hyde KD, Boonmee S, Kang JC, Li QR. (2020) Contributions to species of Xylariales in China—4. Hypoxylonwujiangensis sp. nov. Phytotaxa 455: 21–30. 10.11646/phytotaxa.455.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Pimjuk P, Noppawan P, Katrun P, Mongkolthanaruk W, Suwannasai N, Tanaka J, McCloskey S. (2022) New furan derivatives from Annulohypoxylonspougei fungus. Journal of Asian Natural Products Research 24(10): 971–978. 10.1080/10286020.2021.2004128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Platas G, Gonzalez V, Collado J, Martin J, Montes C, Peláez F. (2009) Ascription of poorly defined taxa to taxonomic entities using molecular phylogenies: A case study on Nodulisporium sp. producers of nodulisporic acid. Mycotaxon 109(1): 443–460. 10.5248/109.443 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Pošta A, Matočec N, Kušan I, Tkalčec Z, Mešić A. (2023) The lignicolous genus Entonaema: Its phylogenetic-taxonomic position within Hypoxylaceae (Xylariales, Xylariaceae) and an overview of its species, biogeography, and ecology. Forests 14(9): 1–27. 10.3390/f1409176440013316 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  155. Pourmoghaddam MJ, Lambert C, Surup F, Khodaparast SA, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Voglmayr H, Stadler M. (2020) Discovery of a new species of the Hypoxylonrubiginosum complex from Iran and antagonistic activities of Hypoxylon spp. against the Ash Dieback pathogen, Hymenoscyphusfraxineus, in dual culture. MycoKeys 66: 105. 10.3897/mycokeys.66.50946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  156. Pourmoghaddam MJ, Ekiz G, Lambert C, Surup F, Primahana G, Wittstein K, Khodaparast SA, Voglmayr H, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Stradal TE, Stadler M. (2022) Studies on the secondary metabolism of Rosellinia and Dematophora strains (Xylariaceae) from Iran. Mycological Progress 21(8): 1–14. 10.1007/s11557-022-01816-x35261576 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Quang DN, Hashimoto T, Stadler M, Radulović N, Asakawa Y. (2005) Antimicrobial azaphilones from the fungus Hypoxylonmultiforme. Planta Medica 71(11): 1058–1062. 10.1055/s-2005-873129 [DOI] [PubMed]
  158. Raei S, Khodaparast SA, Abbasi M. (2012) Contribution to the knowledge of Hypoxylon and Annulohypoxylon in Guilan province (N Iran). Rostaniha 13(2): 197–206. [Google Scholar]
  159. Rambaut A. (2012) Fig. Tree. Tree Fig. Drawing Tool, v. 1.4.0. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ [Accessed May 1, 2021]
  160. Rathnayaka AR, Tennakoon DS, Jones EBG, Wanasinghe DN, Bhat DJ, Priyashantha AH, Stephenson SL, Tibpromma S, Karunarathna SC. (2024) Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. New Zealand Journal of Botany: 1–28. 10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734 [DOI]
  161. Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. (1994) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research 98(6): 625–634. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  162. Reyes PE, Pinzón JP, Valenzuela R, Raymundo T, Tun-Garrido J, García-Sandoval R. (2024) Two new species and a new record of Hypoxylaceae (Xylariales, Ascomycota) from Mexico. MycoKeys 111: 111–127. 10.3897/mycokeys.111.133046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Rogers JD. (2000) Thoughts and musings on tropical Xylariaceae. Mycological Research 104(12): 1412–1420. 10.1017/S0953756200003464 [DOI]
  164. Rogers JD. (2018) The Xylariaceae systematic, biological and evolutionary aspects. Mycologia 71(1): 1–42. 10.1080/00275514.1979.12020984 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  165. Rogers JD, Ju YM. (1997) The genus Stilbohypoxylon. Mycological Research 101: 135–138. 10.1017/S0953756296002298 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  166. Rolshausen PE, Mahoney NE, Molyneux RJ, Gubler WD. (2006) A reassessment of the species concept in Eutypalata, the causal agent of Eutypa dieback of grapevine. Phytopathology 96(4): 369–377. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Roman G, Năstasă V, Bostănaru AC, Mareş M. (2016) Antibacterial activity of Mannich bases derived from 2-naphthols, aromatic aldehydes and secondary aliphatic amines. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 26(10): 2498–2502. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Stadler M, Jones EBG, Promputtha I, Suwannarach N, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Liu JK. (2022) Taxonomy, phylogeny, molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 112(1): 1–88. 10.1007/s13225-021-00495-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Samarakoon MC, Lumyong S, Manawasinghe IS, Suwannarach N, Cheewangkoon R. (2023) Addition of five novel fungal flora to the Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) in Northern Thailand. Journal of Fungi 9(11): 1065. 10.3390/jof9111065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Schoch CL, Robbertse B, Robert V, Vu D, Cardinali G, Irinyi L, Meyer W, Nilsson RH, Hughes K, Miller AN, Kirk PM, Kessy Abarenkov K, Aime MC, Ariyawansa HA, Bidartondo M, Boekhout T, Buyck B, Cai Q, Chen J, Crespo A, Crous PW, Damm U, Beer ZWD, Dentinger BTM, Divakar PK, Dueñas M, Feau N, Fliegerova K, García MA, Ge ZW, Griffith GW, Groenewald JZ, Groenewald M, Grube M, Gryzenhout M, Gueidan C, Guo L, Hambleton S, Hamelin R, Hansen K, Hofstetter V, Hong SB, Houbraken J, Hyde KD, Inderbitzin P, Johnston PR, Karunarathna SC, Kõljalg U, Kovács GM, Kraichak E, Krizsan K, Kurtzman CP, Larsson KH, Leavitt S, Letcher PM, Kare Liimatainen K, Liu JK, Lodge DJ, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Manamgoda D, Martín MP, Minnis AM, Moncalvo JM, Mulè G, Nakasone KK, Niskanen T, Olariaga I, Papp T, Petkovits T, Pino-Bodas R, Powell MJ, Raja HA, Redecker D, Sarmiento-Ramirez JM, Seifert KA, Shrestha B, Stenroos S, Stielow B, Suh SO, Tanaka K, Tedersoo L, Telleria MT, Udayanga D, Untereiner WA, Uribeondo JD, Subbarao KV, Vágvölgyi C, Visagie C, Voigt K, Walker DM, Weir BS, Weiß M, Wijayawardene NN, Wingfield MJ, Xu JP, Yang ZL, Zhang N, Zhuang WY, Federhen S. (2014) Finding needles in haystacks: Linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Xylariaceae. Database 2014: 1–21. 10.1093/database/bau061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Segundo WOPF, de Oliveira RS, Lima RM, Santiago PAL, de Oliveira LA, Cortez ACA, Lima ES, de Souza ÉS, Frickmann H, de Souza JVB. (2022) Antimicrobial potential of metabolites in fungal strains isolated from a polluted stream: Annulohypoxylonstygium WL1B5 produces metabolites against extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Positive Escherichiacoli. Antibiotics 12(1): 27. 10.3390/antibiotics12010027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  173. Senanayake IC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Bhat JD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dayarathne MC, Goonasekara ID, Konta S, Li WJ, Shang QJ, Stadler M, Wijayawardene NN, Xiao YP, Norphanphoun C, Li Q, Liu XZ, Bahkali AH, Kang JC, Wang Y, Wen TC, Wendt L, Xu JC, Camporesi E. (2015) Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 73: 73–144. 10.1007/s13225-015-0340-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  174. Senanayake I, Rathnayaka A, Sandamali D, Calabon M, Gentekaki E, Lee H, Pem D, Dissanayake L, Wijesinghe S, Bundhun D, et al. (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11: 2678–2754. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Senwanna C, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R. (2017) Novel taxa of Diatrypaceae from Para rubber (Heveabrasiliensis) in northern Thailand; introducing a novel genus Allocryptovalsa. Mycosphere 8(10): 1835–1855. 10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/9 [DOI]
  176. Senwanna C, Mapook A, Samarakoon MC, Karunarathna A, Wang Y, Tang AMC, Haituk S, Suwannarach N, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R. (2021) Ascomycetes on Para rubber (Heveabrasiliensis). Mycosphere 12(1): 1334–1512. 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/18 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  177. Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Bhat DJ, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Promputtha I. (2017) Diatrypellatectonae and Peroneutypamackenziei spp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from northern Thailand. Mycological Progress 16: 463–476. 10.1007/s11557-017-1294-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  178. Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Khan S, Promputtha I, Phookamsak R. (2018) Morpho-molecular characterization of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) with two novel species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 356(1): 1–18. 10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  179. Shimizu M, Takase Y, Nakamura S, Katae H, Minami A, Nakata K, Inoue S, Ishiyama M, Kubo Y. (1975) Pipemidic acid, a new antibacterial agent active against Pseudomonasaeruginosa: In vitro properties. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 8(2): 132–138. 10.1128/aac.8.2.132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Sir EB, Kuhnert E, Surup F, Hyde KD, Stadler M. (2015) Discovery of new mitorubrin derivatives from Hypoxylonfulvo-sulphureum sp. nov. (Ascomycota, Xylariales). Mycological Progress 14: 1–12. 10.1007/s11557-015-1043-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Sir EB, Kuhnert E, Lambert C, Hladki AI, Romero AI, Stadler M. (2016) New species and reports of Hypoxylon from Argentina recognized by a polyphasic approach. Mycological Progress 15: 1–19. 10.1007/s11557-016-1182-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  182. Sir EB, Becker K, Lambert C, Bills GF, Kuhnert E. (2019) Observations on Texas hypoxylons, including two new Hypoxylon species and widespread environmental isolates of the H.croceum complex identified by a polyphasic approach. Mycologia 111(5): 832–856. 10.1080/00275514.2019.1637705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Smith G, Liew E, Hyde KD. (2003) The Xylariales: A monophyletic order containing 7 families. Fungal Diversity 13: 175–208. [Google Scholar]
  184. Song ZK, Zhu AH, Liu ZD, Qu Z, Li Y, Ma HX. (2022) Three new species of Hypoxylon (Xylariales, Ascomycota) on a multigene phylogeny from Medog in Southwest China. Journal of Fungi 8(5): 2–16. 10.3390/jof8050500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Spetik M, Pecenka J, Stuskova K, Stepanova B, Eichmeier A, Kiss T. (2024) Fungal trunk diseases causing decline of apricot and plum trees in the Czech Republic. Plant Disease 108(6): 1425–1436. 10.1094/PDIS-06-23-1080-SR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Stadler M. (2011) Importance of secondary metabolites in the Xylariaceae as parameters for assessment of their taxonomy, phylogeny, and functional biodiversity. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 1: 75–133. 10.5943/cream/1/2/1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Stadler M, Dang NQ, Ayumi T, Toshihiro H, Yoshinori A. (2006) Changes in secondary metabolism during stromatal ontogeny of Hypoxylonfragiforme. Mycological Research 110(7): 811–820. 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed]
  188. Stadler M, Fournier J, Granmo A, Beltrán-Tejera E. (2008) The “red Hypoxylons” of the temperate and subtropical Northern hemisphere. North American Fungi 3: 73–125. 10.2509/naf2008.003.0075 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  189. Stadler M, Fournier J, Læssøe T, Decock C, Peršoh D, Rambold G. (2010a) Ruwenzoria, a new genus of the Xylariaceae from Central Africa. Mycological Progress 9: 169–179. 10.1007/s11557-009-0623-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  190. Stadler M, Fournier J, Læssøe T, Chlebicki A, Lechat C, Flessa F, Rambold G, Peršoh D. (2010b) Chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Thamnomyces (Xylariaceae). Mycoscience 51(3): 189–207. 10.1007/S10267-009-0028-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  191. Stadler M, Kuhnert E, Peršoh D, Fournier J. (2013) The Xylariaceae as model example for a unified nomenclature following the “One Fungus-One Name” (1F1N). Concept. Mycology 4: 5–21. 10.1080/21501203.2013.782478 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  192. Stadler M, Læssøe T, Fournier J, Decock C, Schmieschek B, Tichy HV, Peršoh D. (2014) A polyphasic taxonomy of Daldinia (Xylariaceae). Studies in Mycology 77: 1–143. 10.3114/sim0016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Stokes JM, MacNair CR, Ilyas B, French S, Côté JP, Bouwman C, Farha MA, Sieron AO, Whitfield C, Coombes BK, Brown ED. (2017) Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nature Microbiology 2(5): 1–8. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Suwannasai N. (2005) Molecular taxonomic studies of selected members of the Xylariaceae (Xylariaceae). Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand.
  195. Suwannasai N, Martin MP, Phosri C, Sihanonth P, Whalley AJ, Spouge JL. (2013) Xylariaceae in Thailand: A case study of the efficacy of an ITS barcode for automatically identifying species within the Annulohypoxylon and Hypoxylon genera. PLoS ONE 8(2): e54529. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  196. Tan YP, Shivas RG. (2022a) Index of Australian Xylariaceae No. 1. Zenodo, Geneva, Switzerland, 1.
  197. Tan YP, Shivas RG. (2022b) Index of Australian Xylariaceae No. 3. Zenodo, Geneva, Switzerland, 21.
  198. Tan RX, Zou WX. (2001) Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites. Natural Product Reports 18(4): 448–459. 10.1039/b100918o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Tanaka N, Kume T, Yoshifuji N, Tanaka K, Takizawa H, Shiraki K, Tantasirin C, Tangtham N, Suzuki M. (2008) A review of evapotranspiration estimates from tropical forests in Thailand and adjacent regions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148: 807–819. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  200. Thiyagaraja V, Senanayake IC, Wanasinghe DN, Karunarathna SC, Worthy FR, To-Anun C. (2019) Phylogenetic and morphological appraisal of Diatrypelijiangensis sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from China. Asian Journal of Mycology 2(1): 198–208. 10.5943/ajom/2/1/10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  201. Thiyagaraja V, Hyde KD, Piepenbring M, Davydov EA, Dai DQ, Abdollahzadeh J, Bundhun D, Chethana KWT, Crous PW, Gajanayake AJ, Gomdola D, Haelewaters D, Johnston PR, Mardones M, Perera RH, Senanayake IC, Tibpromma S, Yasanthika WAE, Abbasi MW, AbdelWahab MA, Absalan S, Acharya K, Afshari N, Aouali S, Aptroot A, Apurillo CCS, Armand A, Avasthi S, Bao DF, Bhat DJ, Blondelle A, Boonmee S, Boonyuen N, Braun U, Čadež N, Calabon MS, Cazabonne J, Chakraborty N, Cheewangkoon R, Chen K-H, Coleine C, Darmostuk V, Daroodi Z, Dasgupta D, de Groot MD, De Hoog S, Deng W, Dissanayake AJ, Dissanayake LS, Doilom M, Dong W, Dong W, Ertz D, Fortuna JL, Gautam AK, Gorczak M, Groenewald M, Groenewald JZ, Gunarathne A, Han Y, Hongsanan S, Hou CL, Htet YM, Htet ZH, Huang Q, Huang SK, Huanraluek N, Jayalal RGU, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Jiang SH, Jones EBG, Karimi O, Karunarathna SC, Khuna S, Kossmann T, Kularathnage ND, Lestari AS, Li CJY, Li JF, Lin CG, Liu JK, Liu X, Liu Y, Lu L, Lu YZ, Luo ZL, Ma J, Madagammana AS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Marasinghe DS, Martzoukou E, Marin-Felix Y, Miller AN, Monkai J, Noorabadi MT, Norphanphoun C, Olariaga I, Opiña LAD, Pang KL, Peng X, Péter G, Phillips AJL, Pineda MM, Prieto M, Quan Y, Quandt A, Rajeshkumar KC, Rambold G, Raymundo T, Raza M, Réblová M, Samaradiwakara NP, Sarma VV, Schultz M, Seifollahi E, Selbmann L, Su H, Sun YR, Tehler A, Tennakoon DS, Thambugala KM, Tian WH, Tsurykau A, Valenzuela R, Verma RK, Wang J, Wang WP, Wang XY, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wei DP, Wen T, Wijayawardene NN, Wimalasena MK, Worthy FR, Wu HX, Xu L, Yakovchenko LS, Yu FM, Zeng XY, Zhang SN, Zhang ZY, Zhao Q, Wanasinghe DN. (2025) Orders of Ascomycota. Mycosphere 16(1): 536–1411. 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  202. Travadon R, Lawrence DP, Moyer MM, Fujiyoshi PT, Baumgartner K. (2022) Fungal species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Washington wine grapes and California table grapes, with novelties in the genera Cadophora, Cytospora, and Sporocadus. Frontiers in Fungal Biology 3: 1–27. 10.3389/ffunb.2022.1018140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  203. Trouillas FP, Gubler WD. (2010) Host range, biological variation, and phylogenetic diversity of Eutypalata in California. Phytopathology 100(10): 1048–1056. 10.1094/PHYTO-02-10-0040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Trouillas FP, Urbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD. (2010) Diversity of diatrypaceous fungi associated with grapevine canker diseases in California. Mycologia 102: 319–336. 10.3852/08-185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Trouillas FP, Wayne MP, Sosnowski MR, Huang R, Peduto F, Loschiavo A, Savocchia S, Scott ES, Gubler WD. (2011) Taxonomy and DNA phylogeny of Diatrypaceae associated with Vitisvinifera and other woody plants in Australia. Fungal Diversity 49: 203–223. 10.1007/s13225-011-0094-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  206. Trouillas FP, Hand FP, Inderbitzin P, Gubler WD. (2015) The genus Cryptosphaeria in the western United States: Taxonomy, multilocus phylogeny and a new species, C.multicontinentalis. Mycologia 107(6): 1304–1313. 10.3852/15-115 [DOI] [PubMed]
  207. U’Ren JM, Miadlikowska J, Zimmerman NB, Lutzoni F, Stajich JE, Arnold AE. (2016) Contributions of North American endophytes to the phylogeny, ecology, and taxonomy of Xylariaceae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 98: 210–232. 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Urbez-Torres JR, Peduto F, Striegler RK, Urrea-Romero KE, Rupe JC, et al. (2012) Characterization of fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Arkansas and Missouri. Fungal Diversity 52: 169–189. 10.1007/s13225-011-0110-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  209. Vasilyeva LN, Ma HX. (2014) Diatrypaceous fungi in north-eastern China. 1. Cryptosphaeria and Diatrype. Phytotaxa 186: 261–270. 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.5.3 [DOI]
  210. Vasilyeva LN, Stephenson SL, Hyde KD, Bahkali AH. (2012) Some stromatic pyrenomycetous fungi from northern Thailand-1. Biscogniuxia, Camillea and Hypoxylon (Xylariaceae). Fungal Diversity 55: 65–76. 10.1007/s13225-011-0150-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  211. Vieira MLA, Hughes AFS, Gil VB, Vaz AB, Alves TMA, Zani CL, Rosa CA, Rosa LH. (2011) Diversity and antimicrobial activities of the fungal endophyte community associated with the traditional Brazilian medicinal plant Solanumcernuum Vell. (Solanaceae). Canadian Journal of Microbiology 58: 54–66. 10.1139/w11-105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Vu D, Groenewald M, De Vries M, Gehrmann T, Stielow B, Eberhardt U, Al-Hatmi A, Groenewald JZ, Cardinali G, Houbraken JT, Boekhout T, Crous PW, Robert V, Verkley GJM. (2019) Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92(1): 135–154. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Wang RF, Xie WD, Zhang-Xing DM, Ding Y, Wang W, Ma C, Du LJ. (2004) Bioactive compounds from the seeds of Punicagranatum (Pomegranate). Journal of Natural Products 67(12): 2096–2098. 10.1021/np0498051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Wendt L, Sir EB, Kuhnert E, Heitkämper S, Lambert C, Hladki AI, Romero AI, Luangsa-ard JJ, Srikitikulchai P, Peršoh D, Stadler M. (2018) Resurrection and emendation of the Hypoxylaceae, recognised from a multigene phylogeny of the Xylariales. Mycological Progress 17: 115–154. 10.1007/s11557-017-1311-3 [DOI]
  216. Whalley AJS, Edwards RL. (1995) Secondary metabolites and systematic arrangement within the Xylariaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 73(Suppl.1): S802–S810. 10.1139/b95-325 [DOI]
  217. Whalley AJS, Edwards RL. (1998) The Xylariaceae: A study in biological and chemical diversity. Pure and Applied Chemistry 70: 2123.
  218. Whalley AJ, Jones EG, Læssøe T. (1999) Halorosellinia gen. nov. to accommodate Hypoxylonoceanicum, a common mangrove species. Mycological Research 104(3): 368–374. 10.1017/S0953756299001409 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  219. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications.Academic Press, Inc., New York, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  220. Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN. (2017) Towards incorporating asexual fungi in a natural classification: Checklist and notes 2012–2016. Mycosphere 8: 1457–1554. 10.5943/mycosphere/8/9/10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  221. Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Sánchez-García M, Goto BT, Saxena RK, Erdoðdu M, Selçuk F, Rajeshkumar KC, Aptroot A, Błaszkowski J, Boonyuen N, da Silva GA, de Souza FA, Dong W, Ertz D, Haelewaters D, Jones EBG, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kukwa M, Kumla J, Leontyev DV, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Marguno F, Martínez-Rodríguez P, Mešić A, Monteiro JS, Oehl F, Pawłowska J, Pem D, Pfliegler WP, Phillips AJL, Pošta A, He MQ, Li JX, Raza M, Sruthi OP, Suetrong S, Suwannarach N, Tedersoo L, Thiyagaraja V, Tibpromma S, Tkalčec Z, Tokarev YS, Wanasinghe DN, Wijesundara DSA, Wimalaseana SDMK, Madrid H, Zhang GQ, Gao Y, Sánchez-Castro I, Tang LZ, Stadler M, Yurkov A, Thines M. (2022) Outline of Xylariaceae and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13: 53–453. 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  222. Wongkanoun S, Wendt L, Stadler M, Luangsa-ard J, Srikitikulchai P. (2019) A novel species and a new combination of Daldinia from Ban Hua Thung community forest in the northern part of Thailand. Mycological Progress 18(4): 553–564. 10.1007/s11557-019-01469-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  223. Wu YP, Pi YH, Long SH, Lin Y, Long QD, Kang JC, Kang YQ, Shen X, Wijayawardene NN, Zhang X, Li QR. (2021) Morphological and phylogenetic study of five species of Astrocystis and Collodiscula on bamboo. Phytotaxa 522: 265–284. 10.11646/phytotaxa.522.4.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  224. Xie X, Liu LL, Shen XC, Kang YQ, Hyde KD, Kang JC, Li Q. (2020) Contributions to species of Xylariales in China-3. Collodisculatubulosa (Xylariaceae). Phytotaxa 428(2): 122–130. 10.11646/phytotaxa.428.2.6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  225. Yang Z, Zhang B, Qu Z, Song Z, Pan X, Zhao C, Ma H. (2022a) Two new species of Diatrype (Xylariales, Ascomycota) with polysporous asci from China. Diversity 14(2): 1–11. 10.3390/d14020149 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  226. Yang EF, Tibpromma S, Karunarathna SC, Phookamsak R, Xu JC, Zhao ZX, Karunanayake C, Promputtha I. (2022b) Taxonomy and phylogeny of novel and extant taxa in Pleosporales associated with Mangiferaindica from Yunnan, China (Series I). Journal of Fungi 8(2): 1–39. 10.3390/jof8020152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Yannai S. (2004) Dictionary of food compounds with CD-ROM: Additives, flavors, and ingredients. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
  228. Yoiprommarat S, Unagul P, Suvannakad R, Klaysuban A, Suetrong S, Bunyapaiboonsri T. (2019) Eremophilanesesquiterpenes from the mangrove fungus BCC 60405. Phytochemistry Letters 34: 84–90. 10.1016/j.phytol.2019.09.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  229. Yu M, Chen S, Shi J, Chen W, Qiu Y, Lan J, Qu S, Feng J, Wang R, Lin F, Huang G, Zheng C. (2024) Structures and biological activities of secondary metabolites from Daldinia spp. Journal of Fungi 10(12): 1–40. 10.3390/jof10120833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Yuyama KT, Chepkirui C, Wendt L, Fortkamp D, Stadler M, Abraham WR. (2017) Bioactive compounds produced by Hypoxylonfragiforme against Staphylococcusaureus biofilms. Microorganisms 5(4): 80. 10.3390/microorganisms5040080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Zainee NF, Ismail A, Ibrahim N, Ismail A. (2018) Seaweed temporal distribution in southeast coast of Peninsular Malaysia and isolation of endophytic fungi. AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 1940(1): 020069. 10.1063/1.5027984 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  232. Zhang GQ, Dai DQ, Wijayawardene NN, Promputtha I, Bhat DJ, Dawoud TM, Saowaluck Tibpromma S, Wei XM. (2023a) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Hypoxylonzhaotongensis sp. nov. (Hypoxylaceae, Xylariales), a bambusicolous fungus from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 598(2): 111–123. 10.11646/phytotaxa.598.2.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  233. Zhang JF, Liu JK, Hyde KD, Chen YY, Ran HY, Liu ZY. (2023b) Ascomycetes from karst landscapes of Guizhou Province, China. Fungal Diversity 122(1): 1–160. 10.1007/s13225-023-00524-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  234. Zhu H, Pan M, Wijayawardene NN, Jiang N, Ma R, Dai D, Tian C, Fan X. (2021) The hidden diversity of diatrypaceous fungi in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 1–27. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.646262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Astrocystis
XML Treatment for Astrocystis bambusae
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon bahnphadengense
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon chiangraiense
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon crowfoothodgkiniae
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon spougei
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon purpureonitens
XML Treatment for Annulohypoxylon violaceopigmentum
XML Treatment for Halorosellinia
XML Treatment for Halorosellinia xylocarpi
XML Treatment for Stilbohypoxylon
XML Treatment for Stilbohypoxylon chiangraiense
XML Treatment for Hypoxylon
XML Treatment for Hypoxylon thailandicum
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella hibisci
XML Treatment for Hypomontagnella monticulosa
XML Treatment for Diatrypella
XML Treatment for Diatrypella thailandica
XML Treatment for Paraeutypella
XML Treatment for Paraeutypella citricola

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.


Articles from MycoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES