Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 6;15:28738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13925-0

Table 2.

Antibacterial activity of B. rapa extracts, ZnO-QDs and its different combination against foodborne bacteria.

Bacteria Inhibition zones mm (mean ±* S.E)
Negative control Positive control I II III IV V
B. cereus 0 10.5 ± 0.44b 8.3 ± 0.93c 8.5 ± 0.45c 11.8 ± 0.68a 10.3 ± 0.68b 10.2 ± 0.52b
Staph. aureus 0 12.3 ± 1.57a 8.5 ± 0.44c 10.7 ± 0.58b 9.2 ± 0.68c 11.5 ± 0.45ab 10.7 ± 0.68b
E. coli 0 30.0 ± 1.34a 9.2 ± 0.68d 8.3 ± 0.52d 15.0 ± 1.18c 19.0 ± 1.80b 15.7 ± 1.44c
L. monocytogenes 0 32.3 ± 1.25a 8.0 ± 0.86bc 7.7 ± 0.28c 9.0 ± 0.86b 30.5 ± 2.29a 16.8 ± 2.52b
S. typhi 0 32.0 ± 1.95a 7.8 ± 0.68e 8.3 ± 0.26de 9.3 ± 0.28d 15.5 ± 1.18b 11.8 ± 0.25c
P. aeruginosa 0 19.0 ± 0.44a 9.2 ± 1.44d 9.3 ± 0.25d 12.0 ± 0.45c 14.8 ± 0.93b 11.3 ± 0.52c

n = 3, * S.E: Standard error, different subscripts within row are significantly different at the 5% level, I: B. rapa essential oil, II: B. rapa ethanolic extract, III: ZnO-QDs, IV: combination between ZnO-QDs and B. rapa essential oil, V: combination between ZnO-QDs and ethanolic extract, negative control: DMSO, positive control: ceftriaxone.