Abstract
Established risk factors for multiple myeloma including obesity and sedentary lifestyles are associated with well-known racial/ethnic disparities in disease risk. This review examines established risk determinants for multiple myeloma in Black adults, summarizes evidence linking lifestyle factors including obesity, physical inactivity, and diet to disease risk, and discusses energy balance interventions, including culturally tailoring, to mitigate multiple myeloma risk.
We summarize current evidence for racial/ethnic disparities in risk factors for multiple myeloma including unmodifiable heritable factors, modifiable contributors to obesity including diet and physical activity, and barriers to meeting physical activity and healthful diet guidelines. With this evidence, we present considerations to research lifestyle interventions directed towards risk factors for multiple myeloma.
Current foundational scientific evidence in energy balance interventions for cancer risk management are primarily supported in non-Hispanic White populations. Evidence for preventative exercise, diet, or lifestyle interventions for multiple myeloma among underrepresented populations are scarce. Research considerations are proposed to provide strategies utilizing community engagement, primary care education, and importantly, availability of exercise and dietary resources. The importance of tailoring exercise and dietary interventions is also underscored, in addition to generating clinical trial-based evidence to be equitable and beneficial for all populations.
Keywords: health disparities, multiple myeloma, lifestyle interventions, cancer risk
INTRODUCTION
Across racial and ethnic backgrounds, Black adults experience an increased risk of multiple myeloma. Indeed, recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program estimate that per 100,000 individuals, new diagnoses of multiple myeloma would be 15.8 among Black individuals and 6.9 among White individuals.1,2 The complexity of interactions between social, economic, biologic, epidemiologic, and clinical factors may contribute to the racial and ethnic differences in multiple myeloma risk.3 The heritable or genetic factors underpinning the biological differences in race and ancestry may contribute to an unmodifiable aspect of the racial and ethnic disparity.3 However, increasing evidence also suggests that physiological factors such as increased weight and obesity, which are well-established risk factors for multiple myeloma and are more common among Black adults than non-Hispanic White adults, may place the Black population at a heightened risk for multiple myeloma.4
Physical activity and diet are two modifiable lifestyle behaviors that may be used to successfully manage the risk of a number of obesity-related cancers, including multiple myeloma.5 Therefore, identifying preventative measures that target energy balance may be critical to developing interventions to reduce multiple myeloma risk in high-risk populations, including Black adults who are overweight or obese. Considering that non-Hispanic Black adults face a higher risk of multiple myeloma compared to White adults, addressing cultural needs in physical activity and dietary-related cancer prevention measures across all groups may enhance efficacy. Thus, the purpose of this review is 1) provide a brief overview of established determinants of risk for multiple myeloma among Black adults, 2) summarize evidence regarding lifestyle factors including obesity, physical inactivity, and dietary factors and the risk of multiple myeloma, and 3) to discuss energy balance strategies/interventions, including cultural tailoring to mitigate risk of disease.
1. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF DETERMINANTS OF RISK FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA
Multiple myeloma, a malignant neoplasm of permanently differentiated plasma cells, lacks a well-established etiology. Racial disparities in the risk of multiple myeloma, which have been well documented, arise from a complex interplay of biological factors, genetic ancestry, and socioeconomic determinants.6 Alongside inherited factors like family history of multiple myeloma or other plasma cell disorders, risks include age 50 years or older, male sex, being Black or of African descent, and the presence of a precursor condition such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). In addition, emerging epidemiologic studies indicate potential associations with physical inactivity, body composition, and diet.5,7
1.1. Non-modifiable risk factors
Non-modifiable risk factors such as age, sex, and race are significant risk factors for multiple myeloma. Black patients have an earlier median age of onset at diagnosis of 65.8 years compared to 69.8 years for White patients, whereby the influence of genetic backgrounds is poorly understood.8 A family history of multiple myeloma increases disease risk, likely due to shared genetic and environmental factors, with evidence suggesting that genetic inheritance may contribute to the higher incidence of multiple myeloma and its precursor conditions in the Black population.9 Genome-wide association studies have identified 23 susceptibility loci that may contribute to multiple myeloma risk, predominantly in populations with European ancestry, with several also identified in populations with African ancestry.10,11 Although understanding of multiple myeloma susceptibility in persons who are Black is developing in regard to heritable factors, preliminary data indicate that at least some of the risk is due to a genetic predisposition.
1.2. Modifiable risk factors: Emphasis on obesity
Social determinants of health, such as access to nutritious food, housing, healthcare, and education, play a critical role in shaping health outcomes across all populations. However, Black communities are disproportionately disadvantaged due to systemic racism, which perpetuates socioeconomic deprivation, residential segregation, discrimination, and limited access to essential resources, contributing to persistent health disparities in the United States.12 Studies suggest that race-related disparities in multiple myeloma outcomes may be driven by socioeconomic factors, including education, income level, and health insurance status, emphasizing the necessity for focused interventions to address these disparities.13 Furthermore, lower socioeconomic status, whether measured by occupation, income, or education, has been reported to be associated with increased multiple myeloma risk. Indeed, among Black adults, low education and income contribute 17% and 28% to the excess incidence observed, suggesting socioeconomic status as a factor in understanding the disparity in multiple myeloma incidence.14
Obesity, a well-established risk factor for multiple myeloma, is 13.6% more prevalent in Black adults compared to White adults and is a contributor to rising incidence of multiple myeloma among Black Americans.1,2 NHANES data indicate that approximately 48% of non-Hispanic Blacks have an obese BMI compared to 34.5% of non-Hispanic Whites, contributing to the disproportionate effects of obesity-related disorders that include metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.15 These findings highlight the need for increased awareness of multiple myeloma risk among Black individuals who are obese and underscore the importance of prospective studies to determine if weight reduction can mitigate multiple myeloma risk.
Racial disparities in obesity are also influenced by factors affecting access to physical activity that are impacted by built environment characteristics, such as ‘walkability’ indices, land use mix, and transportation variety, along with accessibility to diverse food options and availability of healthy foods.16 Inequitable access to food mirrors disparities in income, poverty, and neighborhood conditions, with the Black American population facing food insecurity at three times the rate of the White population.17 Furthermore, socioeconomic status may impact diet quality, in that individuals with higher socioeconomic status may more likely consume healthy foods including whole grains, lean meats, fish, and fresh vegetables, and fruits.18 Adiposity is linked with consumption of energy dense foods that include refined grains and added fats, along with a possible link with lower socioeconomic status.19 Additionally, Vitamin D deficiency, associated with increased inflammation, is present in up to 75% of patients with multiple myeloma and possibly impacts the initial stage that patients present with.20 Given the increase in obesity prevalence among Black adults, and that excess body weight contributes to elevated risk of multiple myeloma,21,22 this population may benefit from obesity prevention strategies.
2. ENERGY BALANCE STRATEGIES TO REDUCE RISK OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA
2.1. Benefits of a Healthy Diet
According to the World Cancer Research Fund International and the American Institute for Cancer Research, amongst the 13 most common cancers, an approximated one in three cases were preventable if a healthy lifestyle was incorporated, including not smoking, regular physical activity, balanced dietary intake and maintenance of healthy weight.23 While multiple myeloma is not among these common cancers, it is widely accepted that a healthy dietary pattern may be a strategy to reduce cancer risk; this includes regular consumption of a variety of vegetables and legumes, fruits and whole grains, whilst limiting red or processed meats, sugar sweetened beverages, along with highly processed foods, refined grains, and alcohol.24
Dietary interventions related to decreasing multiple myeloma risk are scarce. However, several observational studies have identified foods, nutrients, and lifestyle behaviors that may impact risk for multiple myeloma. For example, adopting fruit-rich dietary patterns in adolescence may reduce the risk of MGUS and when incorporated post MGUS diagnosis, may lower the likelihood of progression to multiple myeloma.25 Food groups can be ranked across a spectrum of inflammatory markers using the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) index, ranging from more anti-inflammatory potential (i.e. coffee, carrots, squash, tea, green leafy vegetables) to pro-inflammatory (i.e. processed meats, red meats, sugary beverages and refined grains). Broadly, men with high EDIP have a 16% increased risk in developing multiple myeloma.26 Evidence in overall dietary patterns suggest multiple myeloma risk is lower with plant-based diets compared to meat-eating diets.27 Additionally, lowered risk of multiple myeloma may be connected with individual dietary components including consumption of fruits, vegetables (especially cruciferous), whole grains, and seafood, and modifications through vitamin supplements.20,28,29 Finally, early evidence indicates diet modification or nutrition targeting the gut microbiome may yield protective results within the bone marrow microenvironment, aiding in control of progression from MGUS to multiple myeloma.30 Considerations for addressing gut microbiome nutrition needs earlier on, may be of interest to study in multiple myeloma risk management. The findings of these observational studies should be considered within the context of their limitations, including reduced generalizability to racially and ethnically diverse populations. Conflicting results across studies may arise from factors such as small sample sizes and residual confounding, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation.
Investigations testing the degree to which energy balance interventions reduce the risk of multiple myeloma are growing but currently remain limited. A recent pilot clinical trial indicated that a plant-based diet is feasible in overweight patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma precursor diseases (MGUS or smoldering multiple myeloma; n=23) with a case series (n=2) of patients who experienced BMI reduction by the end of the one year intervention, implicating the importance of investigating a plant-based diet as a means to delay progression to multiple myeloma development.31 Similarly, PROFAST is an ongoing clinical trial (NCT05565638) investigating prolonged fasting, a type of dietary intervention, as a possible strategy in preventing multiple myeloma development in overweight and obese individuals diagnosed with precursor diseases.32 The degree to which these interventional studies are applicable to diverse patient profiles is unclear, although there is evidence for successful integration of dietary change through culturally tailored dietary interventions, such as the Eat for Life trial and Body & Soul intervention, demonstrate their potential, as supported by the National Cancer Institute’s Evidence-Based Cancer Control Programs.33,34 Though not specific to multiple myeloma, the authors of the study (Harvesting Health Program) demonstrate the effectiveness of culturally tailored programs in fostering healthy lifestyle habits, including weight loss.35 The limited number of studies from culturally tailored dietary interventions in Black or African descent populations emphasizes the importance of developing and clinically testing similar dietary strategies benefitting all ethnic and racial groups.36
2.2. Benefits of Regular Exercise Participation
Exercise, a structured component of physical activity, reduces inflammation, improves immune system function and can play a role in preventing obesity through increased muscle mass and reductions in adipose tissue37,38. However, the response to exercise varies across individuals, due to differing genomic expression and impact of environmental stressors. Due to the difference in genetic make-up across ethnicities, slight differences in response to exercise training occur, therefore the need to tailor a specific training program based on the identification of their genotype and environment may be an avenue to explore across all populations.39
Current literature indicates, across 10 cancer types including multiple myeloma, there is an association between lowered cancer risk and individuals that incorporate leisure-time physical activity.40 Additionally, in a screening cohort of 2,628 individuals throughout the United States, high levels of physical activity were inversely associated with plasma cell disorders such as MGUS.41 Furthermore, there is a compelling link between lowered cancer risk and incorporating physical activity at an early stage in life.42 Based on this, it is necessary to determine how to effectively prescribe exercise interventions as a cancer prevention strategy given the lack of adequately powered randomized controlled trials that target multiple myeloma prevention among racially and ethnically diverse populations.
Efforts to reduce health inequities in Black communities, stemming from systemic racism and unequal healthcare, include the exploration of community-based culturally tailored education (CBCTE) programs across diseases like diabetes and cardiovascular disease.43 Culturally tailored exercise interventions, which account for social and community factors, have also shown success in minimizing health disparities among underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.44 CBCTE programs designed to improve health outcomes, with obesity as a primary focus, in Black adults, are limited in number but indicate community interaction as a critical factor to include along with consideration for age and gender.45 More specifically, of 74 studies reviewed, the CBCTE programs designed education programs to take into account socio-cultural, community and familial factors to provide resources on diabetes (65%), hypertension (30%), cardiovascular disease (3%), and stroke (1%).46 Benefits include patient physical activity, overall health, medication use, and literacy. Additional support is shown in a study designed to increase physical activity through the use of a smartphone and associated app in Black adult women, preliminary data suggests this as a feasible approach with enhancing social support as a primary focus for larger-scale interventions.47 In summary, there is a lack of evidence for interventions that provide culturally appropriate options to tailor exercise programs to target obesity management in Black/African American patients to reduce the risk of developing multiple myeloma.
3. Research Considerations for Risk Reduction
3.1. Proposed Framework for Risk Reduction
The goal is to develop culturally tailored programs for multiple myeloma awareness, education, and risk reduction initiatives promoting behavioral changes in at- risk groups based on known modifiable lifestyle factors. The strategies outlined (Figure 1) include community engagement, primary care education, and availability of exercise and dietary resources, emphasizing (1) cultural tailoring techniques and (2) healthcare system responsibilities.
Figure 1.

Proposed framework for multiple myeloma risk reduction including the following key areas for successful implementation: (1) community based patient support teams, (2) education that is culturally appropriate and (3) access to exercise and dietary resources.
Community Engaged Patient Support Teams
Establishing community-based patient navigation teams is essential for improving patient risk reduction outcomes. Programs like the International Myeloma Foundation’s M-Power platform, illustrate effective community engaged research at the national and local level, and includes collaborative efforts with both medical and non-medical experts, raising awareness of multiple myeloma, its presenting symptoms, its impact on the Black community, and strategies to overcome associated health disparities. Partnerships among primary care providers, certified exercise oncologists, and registered dieticians can enhance advocacy and prevention efforts. Expert teams – comprising patients, advocates, physicians, healthcare providers, leaders in the Black community, and industry representatives – can explore the benefits of preventative exercise and dietary interventions, aiming to standardize risk reduction strategies for patients nationwide.
Healthcare professionals integrated into local communities for specialized diseases like multiple myeloma begins with creating access to educational events in hospitals or community centers with strong Black community engagement. Initiatives like the MMRF and Acclinate’s NOWINCLUDED summit provide resources including educational hubs and mentorship. Primary care providers and hematologic oncologists can participate by delivering presentations, fostering open dialogue with patients and emphasizing the importance of patient advocacy. A national collaboration between oncology groups (e.g., the American Cancer Society), multiple myeloma organizations (e.g., IMF, MMRF), and major cancer centers would standardize access to these resources through both in-person and virtual seminars.
Local collaborations with faith-based groups, YMCAs, and health centers can enhance outreach and engagement, leveraging established infrastructures for health education, screening and lifestyle modifications. Expanding existing programs, such as M-POWER or the MMRF Annual Health Equity Summit48 and Medical Student Scholars for Health Equity in Myeloma49, along with delivering multiple myeloma education in accessible settings (e.g., churches, YMCAs) can improve awareness and diagnostic sensitivity in minority populations.
Metrics of success for Community Engaged Patient Support Teams:
Increased Participation in Educational Events: Annual growth in provider and community member attendance at multiple myeloma educational events hosted in hospitals, community centers, YMCAs, or churches. Track engagement through surveys on self-reported efficacy of the event and feedback for cultural-based development to advise future events.
Improved Patient Advocacy and Early Diagnosis: Monitor the number of patients diagnosed earlier (e.g. stage 1 or 2) as an indicator of improved awareness.
Expanded Community-Based Collaborations: Expand partnerships with community organizations (e.g., faith-based groups, local YMCAs, Black advocacy groups) across major cities to increase outreach annually.
Continuing Medical Education (CME): Track completion rates of multiple myeloma-specific CME among healthcare professionals, with year-over-year growth targets and actively participating in local M-POWER events or similar outreach programs.
Efforts to address engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer have been identified through the Exercise is Medicine in Oncology roundtable.50 Strategies such as Assess-Advise-Refer could be implemented prior to cancer diagnosis, within primary care settings to kickstart a patient’s journey in diet, nutrition and exercise lifestyle habits. Referrals to culturally tailored consultations with exercise physiologists and dieticians, integrated into community-engaged patient support teams, are vital for patients with higher BMI or a family history, focusing on education on risk reduction strategies.
Culturally Sensitive Education Resources
Culturally and linguistically accessible resources for different cultures and languages would benefit primary care setting standard practice.51 Primary care providers should establish transparent, emotionally supportive patient-provider relationships with Black patients and their families that are inclusive in decision-making,52 to promote adoption and maintenance of exercise and dietary habits. Considering the increased risk of multiple myeloma in Black patients, early education should be prioritized on: (1) risk of developing multiple myeloma, (2) comorbidities such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease, (3) benefits of healthy exercise and dietary lifestyle habits as preventative measures that reduce risk, (4) available resources in support of modifying lifestyle habits accordingly (outlined in the next section), and (5) follow-up support on the use of these resources during the course of patient being in the primary care setting.
Culturally appropriate education can include health messages and interventions that are adapted to the values, beliefs, language, and social norms of the Black community. The PEARL guide was developed for African American and Immigrant African women to be used as a guide in putting together culturally sensitive cancer education materials, that highlights the following: Plain language and understandability, Explicit data, statistics and graphs, Affirmative framing, Representative content, and Local connection.53 Although PEARL may not meet all community needs, it offers a peer-reviewed foundation that can be iteratively refined based on community feedback, helping primary care practices deliver relevant and effective health education.
Metrics of success for Culturally Sensitive Education Resources:
Community Feedback and Iterative Improvement: Measure the frequency and quality of community feedback on educational materials and develop a target metric to track retention and satisfaction rates among community members regarding the relevance, clarity, and cultural appropriateness of the materials, with periodic updates based on the feedback received.
National Program Development: Specific to multiple myeloma resources within the Black community that is nationally recognized or implemented would also serve as a long-term goal.
Availability of Exercise and Dietary Resources
Tailored exercise and dietary programs should address specific needs and barriers faced by Black patients and can leverage the community-based participatory approach (CBPR) to reduce health disparities in chronic diseases (i.e. diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, etc.), which involves faith-based social infrastructure characteristics of Black communities.54 The Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance (WORD) Trial, an adapted Diabetes Prevention Program, demonstrate the effectiveness of culturally tailored weight-loss strategies adapted for Black communities, supported by health professionals.55
Implementing similar frameworks for multiple myeloma prevention across exercise and dietary interventions could focus on accessible technology platforms (e.g., mobile apps, text-based resources) and partnerships with local libraries, gyms, and faith-based organizations to bridge digital and physical access gaps. Studies indicate that holistic health promotion, delivered both in-person and through technology, caters to the values, perspectives, and preferences of older Black adults in low-income communities56 To address digital access disparities: (1) platforms should be optimized for mobile use and provide resources via text messages, phone calls, and simple web-based interfaces; (2) collaborations with mobile service providers to offer low-cost data plans or free access to health websites can increase engagement; (3) establish partnerships with local libraries or community centers that offer free digital literacy programs and computer access would further enhance reach; (4) within research-based settings, take advantage of health equity grant offerings to provide further support.57,58
Metrics of success are outlined below:
CBPR Program Development: Designed specific to multiple myeloma for digital accessibility and integration with primary healthcare systems to provide an additional platform for patients and primary care providers to interact in a preventative healthcare space.
Mobile Platform Engagement: Track mobile resource usage, aiming for annual increases in user engagement through text messages, phone calls, or mobile-optimized websites.
Digital Literacy Program Participation: Measure the number of patients with multiple myeloma diagnosis that completed digital literacy programs offered through libraries or community centers over a set period (e.g., one year).
Ensuring access to exercise and dietary resources requires building partnerships with community-based organizations such as local gyms, YMCAs, and parks to offer free or reduced-cost exercise programs.59 Working with local government funding or faith-based community centers, to provide low-cost or free transportation opportunities to locations in safe environments for those that live in unsafe or non-walkable communities.60 Government or non-profit funding could be directed to create wellness centers or support existing facilities in underserved areas.61 Shared-use agreements that allow for after-hours public access to existing facilities such as K-12 education centers could increase accessibility.62 Plans to coordinate with local workplace facilities and policies to encourage physical activity using workplace policies, management support and social support programs would benefit across all communities.63 Additionally, integrating registered dietitians and exercise physiologists into local health clinics can provide direct support to patients, and include mobile health units to deliver services to rural or low-access communities.64 This could be facilitated by a partnership with the Exercise is Medicine Underserved & Community Health Committee to efficiently use existing networks of physical activity resources to continue the promotion of culturally adapted opportunities.
Metrics of success are outlined below:
Participation in Community-Based Exercise Programs: Track the number of individuals participating in free or reduced-cost exercise programs offered through local gyms, YMCAs, or parks, with the goal to increase participation numbers within the first year of implementing the partnerships and programs.
Access to Registered Dietitians and Exercise Physiologists: Monitor the number of patients receiving support from registered dietitians and exercise physiologists in local health clinics or mobile health units. A target metric could be a set increase in patient consultations within underserved or rural communities in the first year of program implementation
Additionally, considerations in exercise prescription and progression plans must account for potential implicit racial biases, particularly in pain management, which is a well-documented disparity in health care settings.65 Improving the availability of exercise and dietary resources for patients addresses barriers relating to trust, awareness, and access that can be delivered equitably across patients. Funding can be sourced from a combination of federal and state public health grants (e.g., CDC, NIH), private foundations focused on health equity, and partnerships with healthcare organizations and pharmaceutical companies with vested interests in multiple myeloma research and treatment. Additionally, community fundraising initiatives and grants from non-profit organizations may support local implementation efforts. Accountability can be maintained through continuous community engagement, transparency in reporting outcomes, and by establishing advisory boards that include community representatives. Regular feedback from participants and stakeholders should be solicited to adapt programs to community needs. Finally, conducting community-based participatory research ensures that investigators work in collaboration with community members, promoting shared decision-making and ensuring cultural relevance and trust.
3.2. Proposed Implementation Plan
To effectively implement these strategies, the following steps are proposed following a similar framework to Bhutani et. al.6, to address the increased risk of multiple myeloma in Black adults using energy balance-based interventions. The first stage would consist of developing a dedicated group of exercise oncologists and registered dieticians specialized in oncology, in collaboration with prevention-focused primary care providers and engaging high-quality care centers for multiple myeloma in advocacy efforts. Followed by developing collaborations with health networks, across cities with higher Black populations, to advocate for implementing partnerships with exercise oncology experts and registered dieticians specialized in oncology prevention. Ongoing research to identify and mitigate risk factors through comprehensive data collection, including genomic analyses by race and ethnicity, is critical to advance mechanistic understanding of multiple myeloma. These efforts can inform the development of targeted exercise and dietary interventions that focus on risk reduction, supported by initiatives such as the Charlotte African American MGUS Project and the PROMISE Study, which focus on screening and epidemiology in Black populations. Trust will be built through transparent communication, culturally appropriate education, and community-specific tools and outreach programs, leveraging partnerships with existing cancer, exercise, and dietary initiatives. As previously noted, a recent example of this was presented through the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) and Acclinate’s NOWINCLUDED community which hosted four multiple myeloma summits in separate cities, providing key resources for individuals affected by the disease. Educational efforts would address cultural differences and communication gaps, ensuring inclusivity in risk reduction strategies within the exercise and dietary programming. Systemic changes promoting health equity, such as universal health insurance coverage and access to high-quality care would support mitigating persistent disparities. This comprehensive action plan aims to reduce multiple myeloma risk in at-risk populations through tailored interventions and healthcare reforms.
4.0. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS/CALL TO ACTION
Black individuals are at an increased risk of developing multiple myeloma due to possible heritable factors along with higher rates of obesity – a modifiable risk factor that can be addressed through various lifestyle interventions including diet and exercise. Dietary intervention strategies focusing on weight reduction, especially in individuals that are overweight or obese, may be one strategy in preventing the development of multiple myeloma. Additionally, exercise interventions that focus on adiposity reduction and muscle mass development may serve as a protective mechanism in the risk of multiple myeloma. The combination of dietary and exercise interventions may provide a more holistic approach in modifiable lifestyle management. Based on underlying racial/ethnic inequities in the Black population, including socioeconomic status and access to resources and support for healthy diet and physical activity regimens, there is a need for energy balance interventions that are culturally tailored to reduce risk of multiple myeloma development. Culturally tailored programs have demonstrated success in fostering healthy lifestyles in the Black population, though there is a lack of research specifically focused on multiple myeloma risk. The hereditary, dietary, and physical activity factors contributing to the health disparity in Black and/or of African descent vs. Non-Hispanic White Americans are moderately established for risk of developing multiple myeloma. The consideration to implement energy balance interventions may support effective care prevention strategies for populations at elevated risk of multiple myeloma, with a focus on efficient dissemination via multisite centers.
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Benjamin M, Reddy S, Brawley OW. Myeloma and race: a review of the literature. Cancer Metastasis Rev. Mar 2003;22(1):87–93. doi: 10.1023/a:1022268103136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.SEER Cancer Statistics Review. [cited 2025 Feb 21]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/
- 3.Marinac CR, Ghobrial IM, Birmann BM, Soiffer J, Rebbeck TR. Dissecting racial disparities in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. Feb 17 2020;10(2):19. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0284-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.National Center for Health Statistics [cited 2025 Feb 21], Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-linkage/index.htm
- 5.Shapiro YN, Peppercorn JM, Yee AJ, Branagan AR, Raje NS, Donnell EKO. Lifestyle considerations in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. Oct 26 2021;11(10):172. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00560-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhutani M, Lonial S, Mikhael J. Disparities in multiple myeloma among African Americans. J Natl Med Assoc. May 2023;115(2s):S26–s31. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang J, Chan SC, Lok V, Zhang L, Lucero-Prisno DE, Xu W, et al. The epidemiological landscape of multiple myeloma: a global cancer registry estimate of disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends. Lancet Haematol. Sep 2022;9(9):e670–e677. doi: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00165-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waxman AJ, Mink PJ, Devesa SS, Anderson WF, Weiss BM, Kristinsson SY, et al. Racial disparities in incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma: a population-based study. Blood. Dec 16 2010;116(25):5501–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-298760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bhutani M, Blue BJ, Cole C, Badros AZ, Usmani SZ, Nooka AK, et al. Addressing the disparities: the approach to the African American patient with multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. Dec 18 2023;13(1):189. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00961-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du Z, Weinhold N, Song GC, Rand KA, Van Den Berg DJ, Hwang AE, et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of multiple myeloma among men and women of African ancestry. Blood Advances. 2020;4(1):181–190. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Catalano C, Paramasivam N, Blocka J, Giangiobbe S, Huhn S, Schlesner M, et al. Characterization of rare germline variants in familial multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Journal. 2021/02/13 2021;11(2):33. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00422-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hill-Briggs F, Ephraim PL, Vrany EA, Davidson KW, Pekmezaris R, Salas-Lopez D, et al. Social Determinants of Health, Race, and Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Black/African Americans as a Population Exemplar. Curr Diab Rep. Mar 2022;22(3):117–128. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01454-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saunders A, Slaff S, Subbiah K, Gu T, Ang KK, Quan MA, et al. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among African American and White patients with multiple myeloma in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma. Jan 2024;65(1):109–117. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2273746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baris D, Brown LM, Silverman DT, Hayes R, Hoover RN, Swanson GM, et al. Socioeconomic status and multiple myeloma among US blacks and whites. Am J Public Health. Aug 2000;90(8):1277–81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. Nov 2015;(219):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oppert JM, Charreire H. The importance of the food and physical activity environments. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2012;73:113–21. doi: 10.1159/000341306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Household Food Security in the United States in 2020. [cited 2025 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=102071
- 18.Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality?1. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008/05/01/ 2008;87(5):1107–1117. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Newton S, Braithwaite D, Akinyemiju TF. Socio-economic status over the life course and obesity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shah UA, Parikh R, Castro F, Bellone M, Lesokhin AM. Dietary and microbiome evidence in multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders. Leukemia. May 2023;37(5):964–980. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01874-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sonderman JS, Bethea TN, Kitahara CM, Patel AV, Harvey C, Knutsen SF, et al. Multiple Myeloma Mortality in Relation to Obesity Among African Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst. Oct 2016;108(10)doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chang SH, Luo S, Thomas TS, O’Brian KK, Colditz GA, Carlsson NP, et al. Obesity and the Transformation of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. May 2017;109(5)doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clinton SK, Giovannucci EL, Hursting SD. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future Directions. J Nutr. Apr 1 2020;150(4):663–671. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rock CL, Thomson C, Gansler T, Gapstur SM, McCullough ML, Patel AV, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for diet and physical activity for cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. Jul 2020;70(4):245–271. doi: 10.3322/caac.21591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thordardottir M, Lindqvist EK, Lund SH, Costello R, Burton D, Steingrimsdottir L, et al. Dietary intake is associated with risk of multiple myeloma and its precursor disease. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee DH, Fung TT, Tabung FK, Colditz GA, Ghobrial IM, Rosner BA, et al. Dietary Pattern and Risk of Multiple Myeloma in Two Large Prospective US Cohort Studies. JNCI Cancer Spectr. Jun 2019;3(2):pkz025. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Castro F, Parikh R, Eustaquio JC, Derkach A, Joseph JM, Lesokhin AM, et al. Pre-diagnosis dietary patterns and risk of multiple myeloma in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Leukemia. Feb 2024;38(2):438–441. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-02132-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wolf ST, Dillon GA, Alexander LM, Jablonski NG, Kenney WL. Skin pigmentation is negatively associated with circulating vitamin D concentration and cutaneous microvascular endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. Sep 1 2022;323(3):490–498. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00309.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mirhosseini N, Psihogios A, McLaren MD, Seely D. Vitamin D and Multiple Myeloma: A Scoping Review. Curr Oncol. Mar 11 2023;30(3):3263–3276. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choa R, Panaroni C, Bhatia R, Raje N. It is worth the weight: obesity and the transition from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. Blood Advances. 2023;7(18):5510–5523. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shah UA, Castro F, Derkach A, Fei T, Hosszu KK, McAvoy D, et al. A Whole Foods Plant-Based Weight Loss Intervention Improves Quality of Life, Metabolic, Microbiome and Immune Profile in MGUS/SMM As Well As Progression Trajectory in a Subset - the Nutrivention Trial. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):4771–4771. doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-182878 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee DJ, O’Donnell EK, Raje N, Panaroni C, Redd R, Ligibel J, et al. Design and Rationale of Prolonged Nightly Fasting for Multiple Myeloma Prevention (PROFAST): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. Mar 11 2024;13:e51368. doi: 10.2196/51368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, De AK, McCarty F, Dudley WN, et al. A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: results of the Eat for Life trial. Am J Public Health. Oct 2001;91(10):1686–93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.10.1686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Resnicow K, Campbell M, Carr C, McCarty F, Wang T, Periasamy S, et al. Body and soul. A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. Am J Prev Med. Aug 2004;27(2):97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spees CK, Braun AC, Hill EB, Grainger EM, Portner J, Young GS, et al. Impact of a Tailored Nutrition and Lifestyle Intervention for Overweight Cancer Survivors on Dietary Patterns, Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Cardiometabolic Profiles. J Oncol. 2019;2019:1503195. doi: 10.1155/2019/1503195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goode RW, Styn MA, Mendez DD, Gary-Webb TL. African Americans in Standard Behavioral Treatment for Obesity, 2001–2015: What Have We Learned? West J Nurs Res. Aug 2017;39(8):1045–1069. doi: 10.1177/0193945917692115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nieman DC, Wentz LM. The compelling link between physical activity and the body’s defense system. J Sport Health Sci. May 2019;8(3):201–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Atakan MM, Koşar ŞN, Güzel Y, Tin HT, Yan X. The Role of Exercise, Diet, and Cytokines in Preventing Obesity and Improving Adipose Tissue. Nutrients. Apr 25 2021;13(5)doi: 10.3390/nu13051459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chung HC, Keiller DR, Roberts JD, Gordon DA. Do exercise-associated genes explain phenotypic variance in the three components of fitness? a systematic review & meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0249501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moore SC, Lee IM, Weiderpass E, Campbell PT, Sampson JN, Kitahara CM, et al. Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults. JAMA Intern Med. Jun 1 2016;176(6):816–25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee DJ, El-Khoury H, Tramontano AC, Alberge JB, Perry J, Davis MI, et al. Mass spectrometry-detected MGUS is associated with obesity and other novel modifiable risk factors in a high-risk population. Blood Adv. Apr 9 2024;8(7):1737–1746. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thomas R, Kenfield SA, Yanagisawa Y, Newton RU. Why exercise has a crucial role in cancer prevention, risk reduction and improved outcomes. Br Med Bull. Sep 10 2021;139(1):100–119. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldab019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fulton JI, Singh H, Pakkal O, Uleryk EM, Nelson M. Community-based culturally tailored education programmes for black adults with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension and stroke: a systematic review protocol of primary empirical studies. BMJ Open. Jun 10 2022;12(6):e059883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Castro FG, Shaibi GQ, Boehm-Smith E. Ecodevelopmental contexts for preventing type 2 diabetes in Latino and other racial/ethnic minority populations. J Behav Med. Feb 2009;32(1):89–105. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9194-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Burton WM, White AN, Knowlden AP. A Systematic Review of Culturally Tailored Obesity Interventions among African American Adults. American Journal of Health Education. 2017/05/04 2017;48(3):185–197. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2017.1292876 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Singh H, Fulton Jt, Mirzazada S, Saragosa M, Uleryk EM, Nelson MLA. Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Communities with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: Systematic Review Findings. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. Dec 2023;10(6):2986–3006. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01474-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Joseph RP, Keller C, Vega-López S, Adams MA, English R, Hollingshead K, et al. A Culturally Relevant Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women: Development and Initial Usability Tests of Smart Walk. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Mar 2 2020;8(3):e15346. doi: 10.2196/15346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation. [cited 2025 Feb 21]. Available from: https://themmrf.org/about/diversity-equity-inclusion/
- 49.Medical Student Scholars for Health Equity in Myeloma. [cited 2025 Feb 21]. Available from: https://mpower.myeloma.org/medical-student-scholars-for-health-equity-in-myeloma-mentoring-program/
- 50.Schmitz KH, Campbell AM, Stuiver MM, Pinto BM, Schwartz AL, Morris GS, et al. Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. Nov 2019;69(6):468–484. doi: 10.3322/caac.21579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stubbe DE. Practicing Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in the Care of Diverse Patients. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). Jan 2020;18(1):49–51. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Williams SW, Hanson LC, Boyd C, Green M, Goldmon M, Wright G, et al. Communication, decision making, and cancer: what African Americans want physicians to know. J Palliat Med. Nov 2008;11(9):1221–6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haynes D, Hughes KD, Okafor A. PEARL: A Guide for Developing Community-Engaging and Culturally-Sensitive Education Materials. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2023/06/01 2023;25(3):666–673. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01418-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Singh H, Fulton J, Mirzazada S, Saragosa M, Uleryk EM, Nelson MLA. Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Communities with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: Systematic Review Findings. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2023/12/01 2023;10(6):2986–3006. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01474-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yeary KHK, Cornell CE, Moore PC, Gauss CH, Prewitt TE, Turner J. The WORD: Outcomes of a Behavioral Weight Loss Maintenance Effectiveness Trial in Rural Black Adults of Faith. Obesity (Silver Spring). Mar 2020;28(3):510–520. doi: 10.1002/oby.22717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wippold GM, Tucker CM, Farishta A, Kim E, Hill R, Burwell A, et al. An in-person and technology-implemented holistic health promotion program for older Black adults in low-income communities. J Natl Med Assoc. Feb 2024;116(1):83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Smith B, Magnani JW. New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019/10/01/ 2019;292:280–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Campanozzi LL, Gibelli F, Bailo P, Nittari G, Sirignano A, Ricci G. The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: A literature review. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1109323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Silva M, Cashman S, Kunte P, Candib LM. Improving population health through integration of primary care and public health: providing access to physical activity for community health center patients. Am J Public Health. Nov 2012;102(11):e56–61. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL. Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004/08/01 2004;28(1):20–28. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2801_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Keith N, Mi D, Alexander K, Kaiser S, de Groot M. PARCS: A Safety Net Community-Based Fitness Center for Low-Income Adults. Prog Community Health Partnersh. Summer 2016;10(2):185–95. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bopp M, Fallon E. Community-based interventions to promote increased physical activity. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2008/10/01 2008;6(4):173–187. doi: 10.1007/BF03256132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Buffey AJ, Langley CK, Carson BP, Donnelly AE, Salsberg J. Participatory Approaches in the Context of Research Into Workplace Health Promotion to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Office-Based Workers: Scoping Review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. Jun 19 2024;10:e50195. doi: 10.2196/50195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Iqbal A, Anil G, Bhandari P, Crockett ED, Hanson VM, Pendse BS, et al. A Digitally Capable Mobile Health Clinic to Improve Rural Health Care in America: A Pilot Quality Improvement Study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. Oct 2022;6(5):475–483. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ezenwa MO, Ameringer S, Ward SE, Serlin RC. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pain Management in the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2006;38(3):225–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00107.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
