Table 2.
Quality assessment of included studies.
| Literature | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suai Li and Liu (2023) (28) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Tornbom and Danielsson (2018) (47) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A |
| Gustavsson et al. (2022) (48) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Thomson et al. (2020) (49) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Paquin et al. (2016) (25) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Moan et al. (2021) (50) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Lehmann et al. (2020) (29) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Amaya et al. (2018) (51) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A |
| Pallesen et al, (2018) (30) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Krishnan et al. (2023) (26) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A |
| Chen et al. (2020) (52) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Wingham et al. (2015) (53) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A |
| Marika et al. (2018) (54) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Celinder et al. (2012) (27) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | A |
| Suzanne et al. (2024) (55) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
| Lo et al. (2024) (56) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | B |
1. Whether the philosophical basis is consistent with the methodology; 2. Whether the methodology is consistent with the research question or research objectives; 3. Whether the methodology is consistent with the method of data collection; 4. Whether the methodology is consistent with the representativeness of the data and the method of data analysis; 5. Whether the methodology is consistent with the interpretation of the results; 6. Whether the researcher own situation is described in terms of cultural background and values; 7. Whether the researcher influence on the research is described, or the research influence on the researcher; 8. Whether the research object is typical and adequately represents the research subject and its views; 9. Whether the conclusions are drawn in accordance with current ethical norms; 10. Is the researcher influence on the research, or the researcher influence on the research; 8. Is the subject of the research typical and adequately representative of the subject and its views; 9. Is the research consistent with current ethical norms; 10. Are the conclusions drawn from the analysis and interpretation of the data.