Table 3.
ConQual quality evaluation of meta-theme results.
| Meta-theme | Dependability | Credibility | ConQual ratings | Explanation of ratings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke survivors perceive the benefits of using virtual reality | Medium | High | Medium | Nine studies were included, of which two were downgraded by one level in reliability by including three “positive answers.” Eight research findings were “unequivocal,” and credibility was maintained at a high level. |
| Stroke survivors perceive the facilitating factors of using virtual reality | Medium | High | Medium | Four studies were included, of which one was downgraded by one level in reliability by including three “positive answers.” Seven research findings were “unequivocal,” and credibility was maintained at a high level. |
| Stroke survivors perceive the hindering factors of using virtual reality | Medium | High | Medium | Seven studies were included, of which three were downgraded by one level in reliability by including three “positive answers.” Nine research findings were “unequivocal,” and credibility was maintained at a high level. |
| Changes in the physical and mental health of stroke survivors using virtual reality rehabilitation | Medium | Medium | Low | Seven studies were included, of which two were downgraded by one level in reliability by including three “positive answers.” Seven research findings had a mix of “unequivocal” and “equivocal,” so the credibility was downgraded by one level. |
| Suggestions and expectations of virtual reality rehabilitation for stroke survivors | Medium | High | Medium | Five studies were included, of which one was downgraded by one level in reliability by including three “positive answers.” Seven research findings were “unequivocal,” and credibility was maintained at a high level. |