. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 12.

Published in final edited form as: Chin Polit Sci Rev. 2024 Jun 24;10(2):254–267. doi: 10.1007/s41111-024-00255-1

Table 3.

Urine Volume Differences Between Latent Classes of Engagement Defined by Each Tracking Method

	Class 1: High Engagement	Class 2: Low Engagement

	M (SD)	M (SD)	t (df)	p	Mean Difference	d

Combined Tracking Methods
Daily Drink Frequency	2187.50 (904.15)	1926.11 (1027.52)	−0.65 (15.27)	.52	261.39	0.28
Daily Volume (L)	2468.89 (1150.85)	1761.77 (810.53)	−1.64 (12.33)	.13	707.12	0.68
Automated Bottle Recordings
Daily Drinking Frequency	1670.00 (42.43)	2034.58 (1017.29)	1.74 (23.73)	.10	−364.58	−1.28
Daily Volume(L)	2151.11 (1287.13)	1930.00 (810.40)	−0.46 (11.46)	.65	221.11	0.19
Manual App Entries
Daily Drinking Frequency	3020.00 (1152.45)	1765.24 (786.72)	2.31 (4.92)	.07	1254.76	1.15
Daily Volume (L)	2705.00 (1098.71)	1696.11 (765.50)	2.36 (10.15)	.04	1008.89	1.00