Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 31;37(3):270–282. doi: 10.54589/aol.37/3/270

Table 4. Median (mínimum; máximum) ΔWI D according to spatula type and resin at each time point .

Resin composite Spatula Time point
After polishing - Immediate After 24 hours - Immediate
Median (minimum; maximum) Median (minimum; maximum)
Suprananofilled Non-manipulated -0.52 (-1.77; 0.31) a -1.99 (-2.84; -0.84) ab
Almore Millennium -1.03 (-1.97; 0.34) a -2.85 (-3.15; -1.39) b
#3 Almore -0.22 (-2.04; 1.47) a -1.47 (-2.23; -0.20) a
LM-Arte Modella -0.94 (-2.67; 8.27) a -1.38 (-3.44; 6.05) ab
Plastic -1.05 (-1.75; 0.76) a -2.01 (-4.02; -0.86) ab
p-value   0.7171 0.0172
Nanohybrid Non-manipulated *-1.72 (-2.56; 0.62) a *-3.13 (-4.26; -1.26) a
Almore Millennium -0.94 (-2.52; 1.43) a -2.21 (-4.95; -1.09) a
#3 Almore -1.12 (-2.41; 0.24) a *-2.78 (-3.76; -1.37) a
LM-Arte Modella -1.18 (-6.78; 1.03) a *-2.69 (-9.28; -1.40) a
Plastic -0.85 (-2.28; 1.24) a -2.20 (-4.41; -0.44) a
p-value   0.3997 0.5754

*Differ from the suprananofilled resin under the same spatula and time point conditions (p<0.05). Different letters in the columns, comparing the spatula types in each resin, indicate that there is a statistically significant difference (p<0.05).