Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep 10;177(10):1400–1414. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00610

Appendix Table 2.

Summary of Outcome Reporting for Vulvovaginal Discomfort/irritation

Comparison # trials
Total N
Follow-up Measurement tool Author, year Intervention Intervention
Mean change
Comparator
Mean change
Direction of effect*** Summary COE
Vaginal estrogen vs. placebo 4 trials N=1,777 12 weeks 4-point severity Archer, 2018 (31) Estradiol cream No data (reported graphically) Very low
⨁◯◯◯
Uncertain
Bachmann, 2009 (36) CEC 0.5g 21/7
CEC 0.5g 2x/wk
−0.2
−0.3**
−0.5**
−0.2**

Constantine, 2017 (32) Estradiol tab 4 mcg
Estradiol tab 10 mcg
−0.8
−0.8*
−0.6*
Freedman, 2009 (37) CEC 1g 2x/wk 88.3% improved 71.7%
Vaginal estrogen vs. no treatment 1 trial N=108 36 weeks Patient diary Eriksen, 1999 (25) Estradiol ring 2 mg 80% symptom resolution 53% Low
⨁⨁◯◯
No difference
Vaginal DHEA vs. placebo 1 trial N=16 12 weeks 4-point severity Labrie, 2009 (62) DHEA 0.25%
DHEA 0.5%
DHEA 1.0%
No data (authors stated a statistically significant difference was observed only for 0.5% DHEA vs. placebo)

Very low
⨁◯◯◯
Uncertain
Oral ospemifene vs. placebo 1 trial N=627 12 weeks 4-point severity Archer, 2019 (48) Ospemifene 60 mg −1.4 (95% CI −3.4, 0.6) −1.4 (−3.4, 0.6) High
⨁⨁⨁⨁
No difference
OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.65, 1.64)
Oral raloxifene vs. placebo 2 trials N=274 12 weeks 4-point severity Parsons, 2003 (52) Raloxifene 60 mg No data (reported graphically) Low
⨁⨁◯◯
No difference
6 months Pinkerton, 2003 (53) Raloxifene 60 mg No data (reported graphically)
Vaginal oxytocin vs. placebo 1 trial N=86 8 weeks Study-specific checklist§ Abedi, 2020 (63) Oxytocin gel 400 IU −5.8* −1.6* Very low
⨁◯◯◯
Uncertain

Abbreviations: CEC=conjugated estrogens cream; CI=confidence interval; COE=certainty of evidence; DHEA=Dehydroepiandrosterone; IU=international unit; mcg=microgram; mg=milligram; OR=odds ratio; SD=standard deviation; wk=week

Direction of Effect Symbols: Based on statistical comparison between arms; ↑ intervention statistically significantly better than comparator; ↔ no statistically significant difference; ? no statistical comparison

Scale score interpretation:

4-point severity (0=none to 3=severe);

Patient diary (none, mild, moderate, or severe);

§

Study-specific checklist (lower=better)

*

Mean difference calculated by review team (trial only reported baseline and follow-up means)

**

Trial did not provide precision statistics (e.g., SD, SEM, 95% CI)

***

Direction of effect is based on statistical significance.