Skip to main content
Annals of Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Annals of Medicine and Surgery
letter
. 2025 Jul 16;87(8):5351–5352. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003557

Breaking chains: IMAAVY redefines generalized myasthenia gravis treatment

Kamran Shahid a, Syeda Rabiah Shahid a, Maliha Khalid b, Aminath Waafira c,*
PMCID: PMC12333722  PMID: 40787486

To the Editor,

In compliance with the TITAN guideline, this letter to the editor discusses the utilization, benefits, and prospects of the utilization of IMAAVY as a treatment for generalized Myasthenia Gravis[1]. On 30 April 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved IMAAVY™ (nipocalimab-aahu, FcRn-blocking monoclonal antibody) for the treatment of generalized Myasthenia Gravis in adult and pediatric populations older than the age of 12[2]; marking a momentous breakthrough in the management of this debilitating disorder.

Myasthenia gravis is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease—with a global prevalence estimated to be between 150 and 250 cases per million people, commonly affecting young women and older men—characterized by weakness in voluntary muscles, including those used for movement, breathing, and swallowing[3]. This incapacitating disease stems from antibodies blocking acetylcholine receptors (AchR) at the neuromuscular junction, preventing muscle contraction—a simple yet paradoxically complex condition. Common symptoms include drooping eyelids, double vision, facial changes, difficulty swallowing or speaking, and limb weakness. A myasthenic crisis, often triggered by infection or stress, may require emergency care. Treatments with anticholinesterase agents (e.g., pyridostigmine), thymectomy, immunosuppressants, complement inhibitors (e.g., eculizumab), and short-term therapies like plasmapheresis and IVIG have been shown to improve muscle strength and function. Yet, no cure is currently available[3].

IMAAVY, the first of its kind, is a fully human FcRn-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets highly specific binding to FcRn, both intracellularly and extracellularly. Engineered for durability, high affinity, and precision, IMAAVY has proven to be effective in reducing pathogenic circulating IgG, anti-AChR and anti-MuSK autoantibody levels. Its mechanism supports long-lasting immunomodulation with minimal adverse immune response to the drug owing to its entirely human-derived property[4]. Thereby, offering a novel therapeutic approach for managing this autoimmune disorder.

This FDA approval follows positive outcomes seen in various clinical trials, one of them being the ongoing Vivacity-MG3 study: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study[2]. The trial demonstrated a rapid improvement in the measured outcome of MG- ADL within the very first week, with the recovery being maintained throughout the course of the study[5]. Moreover, the simultaneously ongoing phase 2/3 Vibrance-MG study directed at pediatric populations revealed a notable reduction in the levels of immunoglobulin G(IgG) over a period of 24 weeks with several participants experiencing minimal symptom expression as well[6].

Although IMAAVY was very well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified, some of the common adverse effects of the drug are an increased risk of infections and hypersensitivity reactions. Infusion-related side effects are also possible, hence why the drug is contraindicated for patients with an allergy to nipocalimab-aahu or any of Imaavy’s ingredients[2,5].

The FDA’s approval of IMAAVY represents a breakthrough toward providing long-lasting disease control to patients afflicted with generalized myasthenia gravis. It has the capability of revolutionizing our approach regarding the management of myasthenia, however further research is needed to address its long-term concerns as well as acquire more detailed information about its administration and effectiveness.

Unlike earlier commentaries of IMAAVY’s approval being found on blogs or news articles, this letter aims to provide a brief and concise peer-reviewed overview of its approval, trial outcomes, and implications within the context of a medical journal.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the peer reviewers and editors for their opinions and suggestions and for their support of this research.

Footnotes

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Published online 16 July 2025

Contributor Information

Kamran Shahid, Email: ksmaija2004@gmail.com.

Syeda Rabiah Shahid, Email: syedarabiahb@gmail.com.

Maliha Khalid, Email: malihakhalid2002@gmail.com.

Aminath Waafira, Email: wafiagany@gmail.com.

Ethical approval

This paper did not involve patients; therefore, no ethical approval was required for this editorial.

Consent

Informed consent was not required for this.

Sources of funding

Not applicable.

Author contributions

The conceptualization was done by K.S. and S.R.S. The literature and drafting of the manuscript were conducted by K.S., S.R.S., M.K., and A.W. The editing and supervision were performed by M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest disclosure

Not applicable.

Guarantor

All authors accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)

Not applicable.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Data availability statement

No data were generated for this manuscript.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data were generated for this manuscript.


Articles from Annals of Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES