Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Nov;71(5):2367–2374. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79430-4

Adsorption of globular proteins on locally planar surfaces: models for the effect of excluded surface area and aggregation of adsorbed protein on adsorption equilibria.

R C Chatelier 1, A P Minton 1
PMCID: PMC1233726  PMID: 8913577

Abstract

Equilibrium statistical-thermodynamic models are presented for the surface adsorption of proteins modeled as regular convex hard particles. The adsorbed phase is treated as a two-dimensional fluid, and the chemical potential of adsorbed protein is obtained from scaled particle theory. Adsorption isotherms are calculated for nonassociating and self-associating adsorbing proteins. Area exclusion broadens adsorption isotherms relative to the Langmuir isotherm (negative cooperativity), whereas self-association steepens them (positive cooperativity). The calculated isotherm for adsorption of hard spheres using scaled particle theory for hard discs agrees well with that calculated from the hard disc virial expansion. As the cross section of the adsorbing protein in the plane of the surface becomes less discoidal, the apparent negative cooperativity manifested in the isotherm becomes more pronounced. The model is extended to the case of simultaneous adsorption of a tracer protein at low saturation and a competitor protein with a different size and/or shape at arbitrary fractional saturation. Area exclusion by competitor for tracer (and vice versa) is shown to substantially enhance the displacement of tracer by competitor and to qualitatively invalidate the standard interpretation of ligand competition experiments, according to which the fractional displacement of tracer by competitor is equal to the fractional saturation by competitor.

Full text

PDF
2367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnold H., Pette D. Binding of glycolytic enzymes to structure proteins of the muscle. Eur J Biochem. 1968 Nov;6(2):163–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chatelier R. C. Analysis of competition binding assays: assessment of the range of validity of a commonly invoked assumption. J Recept Res. 1987;7(6):871–884. doi: 10.3109/10799898709054567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clegg J. S. Properties and metabolism of the aqueous cytoplasm and its boundaries. Am J Physiol. 1984 Feb;246(2 Pt 2):R133–R151. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.2.R133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heimburg T., Marsh D. Protein surface-distribution and protein-protein interactions in the binding of peripheral proteins to charged lipid membranes. Biophys J. 1995 Feb;68(2):536–546. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80215-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lakatos S., Minton A. P. Interactions between globular proteins and F-actin in isotonic saline solution. J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 5;266(28):18707–18713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Minton A. P. Confinement as a determinant of macromolecular structure and reactivity. II. Effects of weakly attractive interactions between confined macrosolutes and confining structures. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1311–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80304-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stankowski S. Large-ligand adsorption to membranes. III. Cooperativity and general ligand shapes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Nov 7;777(2):167–182. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(84)90418-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zimmerman S. B., Minton A. P. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:27–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.000331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES