TABLE 1.
Fungus (no. of values) | Antifungal agent | % Agreement between: |
% Interlaboratory agreement for: |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E and N at 24 h | E and N at 48 h | E | N | ||
C. albicans (90) | Fluconazole | 92 | 92 | 94 | 97 |
Itraconazole | 84 | 80 | 93 | 81 | |
Posaconazole | 89 | 85 | 91 | 92 | |
Voriconazole | 90 | 87 | 94 | 90 | |
C. dubliniensis (58) | Fluconazole | 98 | 98 | 95 | 95 |
Itraconazole | 95 | 92 | 98 | 93 | |
Posaconazole | 93 | 90 | 98 | 97 | |
Voriconazole | 98 | 98 | 98 | 100 | |
C. glabrata (42) | Fluconazole | 92 | 81 | 95 | 98 |
Itraconazole | 90 | 77 | 86 | 93 | |
Posaconazole | 90 | 86 | 88 | 95 | |
Voriconazole | 92 | 83 | 90 | 86 | |
C. guilliermondii (30) | Fluconazole | 92 | 90 | 97 | 93 |
Itraconazole | 90 | 82 | 96 | 97 | |
Posaconazole | 95 | 100 | 96 | 97 | |
Voriconazole | 100 | 100 | 100 | 97 | |
C. krusei (60) | Fluconazole | 97 | 97 | 93 | 100 |
Itraconazole | 90 | 86 | 88 | 100 | |
Posaconazole | 88 | 84 | 90 | 98 | |
Voriconazole | 93 | 92 | 85 | 95 | |
C. lusitaniae (53) | Fluconazole | 98 | 98 | 98 | 100 |
Itraconazole | 93 | 89 | 96 | 100 | |
Posaconazole | 95 | 93 | 100 | 98 | |
Voriconazole | 98 | 98 | 98 | 100 | |
C. parapsilosis (60) | Fluconazole | 98 | 98 | 98 | 97 |
Itraconazole | 94 | 94 | 94 | 98 | |
Posaconazole | 96 | 98 | 98 | 100 | |
Voriconazole | 100 | 100 | 95 | 97 | |
C. tropicalis (28) | Fluconazole | 93 | 93 | 89 | 90 |
Itraconazole | 92 | 67 | 96 | 100 | |
Posaconazole | 83 | 79 | 96 | 100 | |
Voriconazole | 89 | 89 | 89 | 97 | |
All organisms (421) | Fluconazole | 95 | 94 | 95 | 97 |
Itraconazole | 90 | 85 | 93 | 93 | |
Posaconazole | 91 | 90 | 92 | 96 | |
Voriconazole | 94 | 92 | 93 | 95 |
Percent agreements of MICs between the methods within a 3-dilution range (e.g., 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg/ml) in six laboratories, regardless of categorization, and agreements of MIC results by each method among the six centers are given. N, CLSI reference method for yeasts (M27-A2 document); E, EUCAST method (7.1 document). CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods were performed according to their respective testing guidelines.