Table 3.
Transcription and expression levels of specific genes in NSCs from treated and untreated groups.
| Property | 0 mT | 0.2 mT | 0.5 mT | 1 mT | Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NeuroD1 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 8.7 | 173.1 ± 12.3 | 191.3 ± 21.0 | 197.5 ± 21.0 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, * p = 0.024; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, ** p = 0.006; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, ** p = 0.004; n = 4 |
| NeuroG1 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 17.8 | 172.7 ± 12.5 | 183.4 ± 22.0 | 186.8 ± 8.6 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, * p = 0.020; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, ** p = 0.008; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, ** p = 0.007; n = 4 |
| NeuroD2 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 9.5 | 108.5 ± 5.7 | 108.2 ± 4.5 | 102.2 ± 6.8 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.716; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, p = 0737; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, p = 0.992; n = 4 |
| NeuroG2 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 2.1 | 97.8 ± 5.8 | 109.6 ± 10.7 | 109.7 ± 7.7 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.993; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, p = 0.680; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, p = 0.672; n = 4 |
| NeuroD1 protein level (%) | 100.0 ± 12.8 | 169.7 ± 25.0 | 225.7 ± 24.2 | 231.2 ± 25.6 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.104; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, ** p = 0.002; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, ** p = 0.002; n = 6 |
| NeuroG1 protein level (%) | 100.0 ± 4.7 | 130.8 ± 3.6 | 157.7 ± 15.1 | 164.5 ± 22.9 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.315; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, * p = 0.024; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, * p = 0.011; n = 6 |
| Cav1.2 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 5.0 | 101.2 ± 7.9 | 106.9 ± 9.6 | 99.5 ± 8.6 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.992; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, p = 0.871; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, p > 0.999; n = 5 |
| Cav1.3 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 4.3 | 99.0 ± 4.9 | 109.7 ± 7.7 | 95.7 ± 7.0 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.999; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, p = 0.555; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, p = 0.926; n = 5 |
| Cav3.1 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 13.0 | 141.3 ± 23.4 | 222.4 ± 19.1 | 302.9 ± 15.5 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, p = 0.287; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, *** p < 0.001; n = 5 |
| Cav3.2 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 18.5 | 162.5 ± 12.6 | 210.0 ± 22.1 | 203.7 ± 8.2 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, * p = 0.039; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, ** p = 0.001; n = 5 |
| Cav3.3 mRNA level (%) | 100.0 ± 1.9 | 180.1 ± 12.1 | 258.9 ± 14.5 | 198.2 ± 18.9 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, ** p = 0.002; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, *** p < 0.001; n = 5 |
| Cav3.1 protein level (%) | 100.0 ± 4.2 | 233.8 ± 20.8 | 391.8 ± 16.6 | 388.8 ± 13.4 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, *** p < 0.001; n = 3 |
| Cav3.2 protein level (%) | 100.0 ± 3.6 | 166.5 ± 7.5 | 216.8 ± 9.2 | 188.8 ± 13.7 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, ** p = 0.002; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, *** p < 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, *** p < 0.001; n = 3 |
| Cav3.3 protein level (%) | 100.0 ± 10.0 | 204.3 ± 21.5 | 255.8 ± 22.9 | 221.4 ± 20.2 | 0 mT vs. 0.2 mT, * p = 0.013; 0 mT vs. 0.5 mT, ** p = 0.001; 0 mT vs. 1 mT, ** p = 0.006; n = 3 |
Each value is presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test.