TABLE 3.
Presence of AFLP amplimers versus PCR amplicons
| Fragment and method | Presence of amplicon in straina:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 22 | 25 | 26 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 36 | 39 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 49 | 50 | 52 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 58 | 63 | 64 | 68 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 78 | 83 | p1 | |
| A10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFLP | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| PCR | 1′ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1′ | 1 | 1 | 1′ | 1′ | 1 | 1′ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1′ | 1 | 1′ | 1 | 1 | 1′ | 1′ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1′ | 1′ |
| A11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFLP | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| PCR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| B4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFLP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PCR | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a
0, no amplicon present; 1, amplicon present; 1′, amplicon present but slightly smaller; 2, very faint amplicon present.