Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep;43(9):4592–4601. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4592-4601.2005

TABLE 6.

Comparison of discriminatory power of the RAPD-PCR and PFGE techniques for typing S. porcinus strains

Techniquea No. of strains studied No. of electrophoretic types No. of strains belonging to the most common type Discrimination index
RAPD-PCR
    VI 42 8 22 0.663
    AA 42 42 2 1.000
PFGE
    VI 42 16 19 0.787
    AA 42 27 16 0.959
a

RAPD-PCR, polymorphism analysis of DNA by RAPD-PCR; VI, visual inspection; AA, automated analysis; PFGE, polymorphism analysis of DNA by PFGE.