Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2025 Jul 3;93(8):e00010-25. doi: 10.1128/iai.00010-25

Surface antigen SAG1 mediates Toxoplasma gondii fitness and host cell attachment in IFNγ-stimulated cells

Olivia Cohen 1,2, Parag Maru 1, Qinli Liang 1, Jeroen P J Saeij 1,✉
Editor: De'Broski R Herbert3
PMCID: PMC12341370  PMID: 40607979

ABSTRACT

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite that can establish lifelong infections and cause severe disease in immunocompromised individuals. Interferon gamma (IFNγ) is a key host defense cytokine that induces a variety of toxoplasmacidal mechanisms. Recent CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function screens identified multiple Toxoplasma genes important for fitness in IFNγ-stimulated cells. One consistent hit in several screens was the parasite surface antigen, SAG1. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a SAG1 knockout strain and found that SAG1 is important for parasite fitness specifically in IFNγ-stimulated cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that host surface sialic acids are important for parasite attachment, especially in IFNγ-stimulated cells. SAG1-deficient parasites had reduced attachment efficiency, which was exacerbated in IFNγ-treated cells. These findings highlight the role of SAG1 in mediating robust parasite attachment, especially in the context of immune pressure.

KEYWORDS: Toxoplasma, SAG1, attachment, interferon gamma, surface antigen, sialic acid

INTRODUCTION

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), the causative agent of toxoplasmosis, is an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite that belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa (1). It can establish a chronic infection in the human host that is asymptomatic in the vast majority of cases but can cause life-threatening disease in the developing fetus and in immunocompromised individuals (2). The infection is widespread, with a seroprevalence rate of ~25% worldwide (3).

Its success as a pathogen largely depends on its efficient invasion of host cells and its ability to evade the host immune response. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of host cell invasion and immune evasion is important for developing strategies to combat toxoplasmosis. The initial step in T. gondii infection involves the recognition and attachment to host cells, a process mediated by the parasite’s surface proteins, including glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored surface antigen (SAG) family members and micronemal proteins (MICs) (4, 5). Among the SAG family members, SAG1 (encoded by TGGT1_233460) is one of the most abundant and well-characterized. It is a known immunogen (6) and has been implicated in host cell recognition and attachment (7). Sialic acids (8), particularly alpha2,3-linked sialic acids (9), and sulfated proteoglycans (10), such as heparan sulfate (11) proteoglycans, are thought to serve as receptors for T. gondii attachment. Parasite lectins, including several MICs (12), have been shown to interact with hosts' sulfated polysaccharides (13), with this interaction playing a role in parasite invasion. For example, TgMIC1 specifically recognizes sialylated oligosaccharides on host cell surfaces, thereby facilitating attachment and invasion (14). T. gondii sialic acid binding protein 1 (SABP1) is another protein that has been shown to bind sialic acid on the surface of host cells (15). Following attachment, the apical microneme and rhoptry organelles secrete the transmembrane adhesin apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and the host cell surface receptor rhoptry neck protein complex (RON complex), respectively, to drive the invasion process to completion (16).

T. gondii infection triggers mainly a type 1 immune response, with the main defense mechanism being the secretion of interferon gamma (IFNγ). Upon infection, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) present on innate immune cells are activated and induce the secretion of interleukin (IL)-12. This cytokine promotes T and natural killer (NK) cells to secrete IFNγ, inducing a variety of toxoplasmacidal mechanisms (17). In mice, the effects of IFNγ are predominantly mediated through the induction of immunity-related GTPases (IRGs) and guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) that destroy the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) and the parasite within (18). In human cells, IFNγ can induce atypical apoptotic cell death in infected human macrophages, but other effectors induced by IFNγ seem to vary depending on cell type and parasite strain (19). Recently, it was shown that the IFNγ-inducible E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF213 (ring finger protein 213) is recruited to the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) where it mediates ubiquitylation of the PV, recruitment of ubiquitin adaptor proteins, and restriction of T. gondii (20, 21). However, most genes involved in T. gondii’s evasion of the immune system and survival in response to IFNγ remain uncharacterized.

In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 screens have facilitated the identification of genes important for T. gondii’s survival under immune pressure. Since IFNγ secretion is a major immune defense pathway used by the human host against T. gondii, we and others recently performed CRISPR/Cas9 screens to identify genes conferring T. gondii fitness in IFNγ-stimulated human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) (22, 23). These screens yielded several promising hits, including SAG1. Additional screens in IFNγ-stimulated murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) (24), as well as several in vivo screens, also identified SAG1 as important for parasite survival under immune stimulation (25, 26). Here, we investigated the role of SAG1 in conferring parasite fitness in IFNγ-stimulated cells. By generating a T. gondii SAG1 knockout strain and assessing parasite fitness in naive and IFNγ-stimulated cells, we confirm that SAG1 is important for parasite survival under immune pressure. In IFNγ-stimulated cells, the absence of SAG1 led to significantly decreased attachment, suggesting IFNγ modulates the host cell in a way that affects the parasite attachment mechanism.

RESULTS

SAG1 knockout parasites are more susceptible to IFNγ compared to wild-type parasites

Our previous genome-wide loss-of-function CRISPR screen identified 11 high-confidence T. gondii genes as contributing to parasite fitness in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs (22). Among these was TGGT1_233460 (SAG1). To confirm this finding, a SAG1 knockout strain was generated in the T. gondii RH strain background using CRISPR/Cas9. After pyrimethamine selection, clonal lines of the knockout parasites were screened and confirmed with PCR (Fig. 1A).

Fig 1.

Schematic outlines the CRISPR-mediated replacement of SAG1 with DHFR in Δsag1 mutant, as confirmed by PCR. Plaque images compare WT and Δsag1 growth with or without IFNγ. Bar graphs quantify plaque size and number reduction under IFNγ treatment.

SAG1 knockout parasites are more susceptible to IFNγ. (A) Schematic illustration showing the CRISPR strategy to disrupt the SAG1 gene with an DHFR selection cassette. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified products using primers P1 and P2 specific for SAG1. In the Δsag1 strain, the DHFR cassette insertion results in a ~4 kb product, while the wild-type strain lacks this insertion, producing the expected 467 bp product. * Aspecific band. (B and C) The percent reduction in the mean plaque area (representative images in B) relative to the plaque area of wild-type parasites in naive HFFs is shown for wild-type and Δsag1 strains in both naive and IFNγ-stimulated (10 units/mL) HFFs. Data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments, and statistical differences were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). Data represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments. (D) The percentage decrease in the number of lysis plaques formed in IFNγ-stimulated (10 units/mL) HFFs relative to naive HFFs is shown for each strain. Data represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was determined using one-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01).

Once the SAG1 knockout strain was confirmed, plaque assays were done to compare the overall growth of wild-type and Δsag1 parasites in naive and IFNγ-stimulated HFFs. In naive HFFs, the plaque areas were not significantly different between wild-type and Δsag1 parasites. In IFNγ-stimulated HFFs, the plaque areas formed by the Δsag1 strain were significantly smaller than those formed by the wild-type (WT) strain. Specifically, in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs, the plaques formed by the Δsag1 strain were only 34.8 ± 18% the size of plaques formed by the WT parasites in naive HFFs. In contrast, the WT strain formed plaques that were 68.9 ± 22.8% the size of those in naive HFFs under the same IFNγ-stimulated conditions (Fig. 1B). The Δsag1 strain also showed a significantly greater reduction in plaque numbers (80.5 ± 9.7%) compared to the WT strain (30.5 ± 3.3%) when comparing the number of plaques formed in IFNγ-stimulated vs. naive HFFs (Fig. 1C). Thus, the Δsag1 parasites have a fitness defect specifically in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs.

The phenotype observed for Δsag1 is independent of cholesterol

To confirm the phenotype observed for the Δsag1 strain under IFNγ stimulation, a complemented strain was generated. The complementation was achieved by targeting the UPRT locus using two plasmids: one containing the SAG1 gene driven by its native promoter, and the other expressing Cas9 along with an sgRNA targeting UPRT. After transfection, selection with 10 µM FUDR was performed, and successful complementation was confirmed with IFA (Fig. 2A).

Fig 2.

Schematic illustrates SAG1 reintroduction into Δsag1 mutant via UPRT locus recombination. Fluorescent images verify SAG1 restoration. Bar graphs quantify plaque size and number loss under IFNγ or serum treatments across strains.

Effect of 25HC, IFNγ, and delipidated serum on the lysis plaque formation in wild-type, Δsag1, and complemented Toxoplasma strains. (A) Complementation strategy of SAG1 into the UPRT locus. An antibody against SAG1 (green) was used to confirm complementation. DAPI stain (blue) shows the nuclear DNA. (B) The mean reduction in the lysis plaque area was assessed for infections of naive HFFs compared to HFFs pre-stimulated with 2 µM 25HC or 10 units/mL IFNγ. Additionally, the mean percentage decrease in the lysis plaque area was compared between infections in regular and delipidated sera. Data are shown for three T. gondii strains (WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01). (C) The percentage reduction in the number of lysis plaques formed in HFFs stimulated with IFNγ, treated with 25HC, or cultured in delipidated serum was compared to naive HFFs in regular serum for the indicated strains. Results represent three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01).

Plaque assays were performed to further characterize the phenotype in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs as well as additional conditions. Since IFNγ is known to upregulate cholesterol-25-hydroxylase (CH25H) (27), which synthesizes 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC), we hypothesized that the fitness loss observed in the Δsag1 strain could be due to cholesterol depletion. 25HC inhibits cholesterol synthesis and reduces accessible cholesterol at the plasma membrane (28), a mechanism that has been shown to inhibit the entry of several intracellular pathogens (29). For T. gondii, host plasma membrane cholesterol plays an important role in parasite invasion (30). The depletion of host membrane cholesterol has been shown to reduce the formation of evacuoles, the vesicles containing rhoptry proteins secreted during host cell attachment, suggesting that cholesterol is important for rhoptry secretion (31).

To test whether the Δsag1 phenotype was due to the IFNγ-mediated formation of 25HC and subsequent reduced host cell membrane cholesterol, plaque assays were performed under four conditions: (i) unstimulated HFFs; (ii) IFNγ-stimulated HFFs; (iii) HFFs treated with 25HC; and (iv) HFFs cultured in medium containing delipidated serum (Fig. 2B and C).

In IFNγ-stimulated HFFs, the Δsag1 strain showed the previously observed phenotype with a significant reduction in both plaque number and area compared to the unstimulated condition. However, 25HC treatment or the use of delipidated serum did not significantly affect the plaque formation by the Δsag1 strain, disproving the initial hypothesis. As expected, the complementation of the Δsag1 strain with SAG1 restored the wild-type phenotype, confirming that SAG1 is important for IFNγ resistance, but that the observed phenotype is independent of cholesterol availability.

The Δsag1 strain has an attachment defect that is exacerbated in IFNγ-stimulated host cells

Since the effect of IFNγ on the growth of the Δsag1 strain did not appear to be mediated through IFNγ-mediated upregulation of 25HC, alternative mechanisms were investigated. A parasite per vacuole assay was performed to assess parasite replication during a 28-h infection. The average number of parasites per vacuole was quantified 28 h post-infection in naive and IFNγ-stimulated HFFs (Fig. 3A). Although IFNγ inhibited parasite replication in all three strains, no significant differences were observed among the three strains (WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1), suggesting that parasite replication is not affected by SAG1 deletion. Next, the possibility of a defect in parasite entry into host cells was evaluated using an invasion assay. Following a 1-h infection in naive or IFNγ-stimulated HFFs, the percentage of parasites that were extracellular vs. intracellular was determined. In naive HFFs, there was no significant difference in the percentage of intracellular parasites between all the strains, while in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs, the Δsag1 strain showed an 8% reduction in the relative number of intracellular parasites compared to WT (Fig. 3B). When the total number of parasites (extracellular and intracellular) was counted, a 26% reduction in total parasites was observed for the Δsag1 strain in naive HFFs (Fig. 3C). This reduction increased to 56% in IFNγ-stimulated HFFs. The complementation of the Δsag1 strain with SAG1 (Δsag1::SAG1) restored the total number of parasites to wild-type levels. These findings suggest that the phenotype of the Δsag1 strain is associated with an attachment defect, which is significantly exacerbated in the presence of IFNγ.

Fig 3.

Bar plots compare parasite vacuole occupancy, intracellular retention, and total count across wild-type, Δsag1, and complemented strains, with or without IFNγ. IFNγ reduces attachment, particularly in Δsag1, indicating SAG1-mediated protection.

Investigating the mechanisms underlying the Δsag1 phenotype. (A) HFFs were either prestimulated with IFNγ (10 units/mL) or left unstimulated, followed by infection with the indicated parasite strains (RH background) for 28 h. Cells were fixed, and the number of parasites per vacuole was counted. Statistical analysis using a two-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the strains. (B) The percentage of intracellular parasites was determined for the three strains (WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1) after a 1 h infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 on HFFs pre-stimulated (10 units/mL) or not with IFNγ. (C) The total number of parasites was quantified by counting 25 fields of view per strain. The same number of parasites was added to each well for each strain. All the results represent three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001).

Sialic acids are important for parasite attachment, especially in IFNγ-stimulated cells

The previous results suggest that SAG1 is important for parasite fitness by mediating T. gondii attachment, particularly under IFNγ stimulation. To test this hypothesis, we performed attachment assays to evaluate the role of SAG1 and host glycan modifications in T. gondii adhesion to host cells under both baseline and IFNγ-stimulated conditions. Compared to WT parasites in the unstimulated human HT-29 epithelial cell line (set at 100% attachment), the Δsag1 strain displayed a significantly reduced attachment, with only 81% of WT attachment levels, indicating the important role of SAG1 in mediating adhesion. The complementation of the Δsag1 strain with SAG1 (Δsag1::SAG1) restored attachment to near-WT levels, confirming the importance of SAG1. In IFNγ-stimulated HT-29 cells, the attachment of WT and Δsag1::SAG1 parasites was not significantly different compared to unstimulated cells, whereas that of the Δsag1 strain was significantly reduced to 60% of WT levels, indicating that SAG1-independent adhesion mechanisms are less effective under IFNγ stimulation. To further examine the role of specific host glycans, we performed attachment assays using wild-type HT-29, SLC35A1-KO, and SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO HT-29 cells (32). Solute Carrier Family 35 Member A1 (SLC35A1) encodes a cytidine monophosphate (CMP)-sialic acid transporter essential for sialic acid biosynthesis, while exostosin-like glycosyltransferase 3 (EXTL3) is required for the initiation of heparan sulfate chain synthesis (33, 34). In the absence of IFNγ, the attachment of WT parasites to SLC35A1-KO cells was significantly reduced to 55% of attachment seen in HT-29 cells, indicating dependency on sialic acid. Similar attachment levels were observed in SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells (55% of attachment seen in HT-29 cells), with no further decrease compared to SLC35A1-KO, suggesting that heparan sulfate plays a minimal role in SAG1-mediated adhesion. The Δsag1 parasites had even lower attachment rates in SLC35A1-KO, attaching at only 43% of the attachment seen of WT parasites to HT-29 cells, with no further decrease observed in SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells. This further demonstrates that SAG1 and sialic acid are critical for adhesion. Under IFNγ stimulation, the attachment of the WT and Δsag1::SAG1 parasites in both SLC35A1-KO and SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells remained stable at approximately 57% of the attachment seen in HT-29 cells, but that of the Δsag1 parasites was significantly reduced to ~25% of attachment seen for the WT parasites in HT-29 cells (Fig. 4). Overall, these results highlight the dominant role of SAG1 in ensuring robust parasite attachment, especially when host glycan availability is limited or when host cells are stimulated with IFNγ.

Fig 4.

Bar graph presents the attachment efficiency of WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1 strains in multiple host cell lines with or without IFNγ. Δsag1 shows significantly reduced attachment rescued in complemented strains, confirming SAG1’s attachment role.

Attachment of Toxoplasma is associated with sialic acids. Attachment assay results for the indicated strains (WT, Δsag1, Δsag1::SAG1) were evaluated in HT-29 wild-type cells or in SLC35A1 single knock-out (SLC35A1-KO) or SLC35A1/exostosin-like glycosyltransferase three double knock-out (SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO) cells with or without IFNγ stimulation (10 units/mL). Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments, with 15 fields of view counted per replicate. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

IFNγ is a key mediator of host immune responses against T. gondii, activating multiple toxoplasmacidal pathways that restrict parasite survival. Genome-wide CRISPR screens identified the major surface antigen SAG1 as important for parasite fitness under IFNγ stimulation. Using a SAG1 knockout strain (Δsag1) and performing mechanistic studies, we demonstrate that SAG1 plays a major role in mediating robust parasite attachment to IFNγ-stimulated host cells.

IFNγ restricts T. gondii at several stages. In murine cells, post-invasion defenses include immunity-related GTPases (IRGs) and guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) that assemble on the PV and destroy the parasite, whereas human cells rely on RNF213-mediated ubiquitylation and IDO-dependent tryptophan depletion. Our data place SAG1 at an earlier checkpoint: attachment to the IFNγ-remodeled host plasma membrane. IFNγ has been shown to be able to alter this surface by downregulating or redistributing entry receptors, including sialic acid clusters, CD4, and claudin-1, and by modifying the expression and structure of host glycans (35–37). These changes broadly restrict the entry of intracellular pathogens and likely impair low-affinity, SAG1-independent adhesion pathways.

Although IFNγ can increase the sulfation of heparan sulfate proteoglycans via induction of N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase (NDST), attachment assays using SLC35A1/EXTL3 double-knockout host cells showed only a minor reduction in binding compared to the SLC35A1 single knockout. Instead, IFNγ-driven host cell plasma membrane remodeling appears to primarily disrupt SAG1-independent adhesion mechanisms, which rely on weaker interactions, making SAG1 indispensable for high-affinity attachment. Accordingly, the Δsag1 parasites show a pronounced defect in host cell attachment under IFNγ treatment, whereas the wild-type parasites do not. Loss of surface sialic acids in SLC35A1-deficient HT-29 cells further reduces attachment, especially in the absence of SAG1. These observations indicate that SAG1 functions as a high-affinity adaptor that maintains efficient invasion when alternative adhesins are suppressed by IFNγ. By enabling parasite entry despite cytokine pressure, SAG1 complements post-invasion effectors, such as ROP18 and ROP5. Together, the data support a model in which SAG1 safeguards the first step of invasion under immune stress by stabilizing parasite-host interactions at the remodeled host cell surface.

These findings highlight SAG1 as a potential therapeutic target. SAG1 is highly conserved among the major clonal lineages of T. gondii, and orthologs, such as NcSAG1, in Neospora caninum play similar roles in host-cell binding and virulence (38). Vaccines directed against SAG1 could, therefore, be used as broad adjunct therapies to current treatments for severe or congenital toxoplasmosis and help prevent Neospora infections in cattle. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting conformational SAG1 epitopes inhibit tachyzoite attachment in vitro and may be even more effective in vivo, where IFNγ suppresses alternative adhesins and increases parasite reliance on SAG1. Recombinant and DNA-encoded SAG1 vaccines have already reduced brain cyst burden and vertical transmission by up to 60% in murine models. Further work dissecting SAG1-host receptor interactions in IFNγ-stimulated cells may yield additional intervention strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell and parasite culture

HFFs were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10 µg/mL gentamicin (HFF medium). For plaque assays, HFFs were seeded into 24-well plates and infected after cells were confluent. HFFs used for indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFA) were seeded on 12 mm glass coverslips in 24-well plates and infected after cells were confluent. The HT-29, SLC35A1-KO, and SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells were a gift from Dr. Siyuan Ding. The HT-29 cells were maintained in advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1× nonessential amino acids, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, and 10% FBS and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. The generation of the SLC35A1-KO and SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells was previously described (32). Parasites were maintained on confluent HFF monolayers in DMEM with 1% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine.

Generation of Δsag1 parasites

Knockouts of TGGT1_233460 (SAG1) were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Two sgRNAs were designed (sequences listed in Table S1). Each sgRNA was inserted into the BsaI site of the pU6-Universal vector (which also contains Cas9) (39) using T4 DNA ligase. The parental strain RH-Luc/Δhxgprt (40) was used to generate the knockout. The parasites were co-transfected with the pU6-Universal vector containing both the sgRNA and Cas9 to generate Cas9-directed double-stranded DNA breaks and a template containing a DHFR cassette (22) to repair the breaks. The transfected parasites were selected 24 h after transfection with 0.1 µL/mL pyrimethamine to enrich for those carrying the DHFR cassette at the Cas9 cut site. After three rounds of drug selection, single clones were isolated using limiting dilution. Once clonal lines were established, they were screened to confirm the insertion of the DHFR repair cassette using primers P1 and P2 listed in Table S1. For the confirmation of knockout, we used genomic PCR, as well as IFA, using a rabbit anti-SAG1 antibody (polyclonal rabbit anti-SAG1 antibodies were a kind gift from John Boothroyd, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA).

Complementation of the Δsag1 strain with SAG1

The Δsag1 strain was complemented by inserting the SAG1 gene into the UPRT locus. To construct the complementation plasmid, the pUPRT::DHFR-D plasmid backbone (Addgene: plasmid #58528) containing UPRT 5′ and 3′ homology regions was PCR-amplified with primers P4 and P5 to remove the DHFR cassette. The SAG1 coding region, including 5′UTR (1,000 bp upstream of the start codon, containing the putative promoter) and 3′UTR (500 bp downstream of the stop codon), was amplified with primers P6 and P7 (Table S1). The amplified plasmid backbone and the amplified SAG1 insert were assembled using the Gibson assembly reaction and subsequently transfected into the RH-Luc/Δhxgprt/Δsag1/DHFR+ strain. To facilitate the integration of the SAG1 expression cassette at the UPRT locus through homologous recombination, the plasmid pSAG1::Cas9-U6::sgUPRT (Addgene plasmid #54467) containing an sgRNA targeting UPRT was co-transfected. After transfection, the parasites were allowed to replicate and lyse out. Selection with 10 µM FUDR (41) was performed, and after three rounds of selection, limiting dilution was used to isolate single clones. These clones were then screened for SAG1 expression using IFA.

Immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

HFFs grown on glass coverslips were infected with parasites for 18 to 24 h. After infection, the coverslips were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. Following fixation, the coverslips were washed again with PBS, permeabilized, and blocked using a blocking buffer containing PBS with 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% (v/v) goat serum, and 0.1% Triton X-100. Samples were incubated with the primary antibody at 4°C for 3 to 12 h depending on the specific antibody used. After primary antibody incubation, the coverslips were washed three times with PBS, and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies along with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (for DNA staining) were added. The samples were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted with a VectaShield mounting medium and visualized using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with NIS-Elements software (Nikon) and a digital camera (CoolSNAP EZ; Roper Scientific). Imaging was performed using fluorescence, phase contrast, or differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging.

Plaque assay

Confluent monolayers of HFFs were cultured in 24-well plates. DMEM medium with 10% FBS was replaced 24 h prior to infection. Depending on the experimental condition, the medium was replaced with a medium containing human IFNγ (10 U/mL), 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC, 2 µM), or 10% delipidated serum. Each well was then infected with 100 parasites using either naive HFFs or HFFs pre-stimulated with IFNγ, 25HC, or 10% delipidated serum. On day five post-infection, plaques were counted and imaged using a Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER digital camera and a 4× objective. All experiments were performed at least three times with duplicate wells for each condition.

Parasites/vacuole assay

HFFs containing parasites were harvested and lysed using syringes, and extracellular parasites were washed and counted. A multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 for each parasite strain (WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1) was used to infect coverslips in 24-well plates containing a monolayer of HFFs. The HFF monolayers were either naive or pre-stimulated with 10 U/mL IFNγ for 24 h before infection. Following infection, the plates were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 28 h. After incubation, the coverslips were washed with PBS, fixed, and processed for IFA using SAG2A antibodies. A total of 200 vacuoles per coverslip were used to count parasites per vacuole, and data were plotted using GraphPad Prism.

Invasion assay

Parasites were harvested, filtered, and used at an MOI of 1 for each parasite strain (WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1). The parasites were added to coverslips in 24-well plates containing monolayers of HFFs, which were either naive or stimulated with 10 U/mL IFNγ for 24 h before infection. The plates were centrifuged at 900 ×g for 3 min to synchronize parasite attachment and subsequently incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. At 1 h post-infection, the medium was aspirated, and the coverslips were fixed with 4% formaldehyde. The fixed coverslips were washed and incubated with a non-permeabilizing blocking buffer (2% FBS in PBS) for 1 h. To stain extracellular parasites, the coverslips were incubated with the first primary antibody against SAG2A (rabbit 1:2,000) for 3 h at 4°C. After five PBS washes, the coverslips were blocked with a permeabilizing blocking buffer (PBS with 3% [w/v] BSA, 5% [v/v] goat serum, and 0.1% Triton X-100). All parasites (extracellular and intracellular) were then stained using anti-Toxoplasma serum obtained from pre-immunized mice for 3 h. The coverslips were washed five times, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit Alexa-488 for extracellular parasites and anti-mouse Alexa-594 for all parasites) for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted, and 25 fields per coverslip were analyzed. The percentage of intracellular parasites (not green) was calculated for the invasion assay. The total number of parasites for each strain was compared to assess general attachment/invasion efficiency, as unattached parasites would have been removed during washing steps.

Attachment assay

The attachment ability of tachyzoites from WT, Δsag1, and Δsag1::SAG1 strains to various host cell lines was determined by the attachment assays. Freshly egressed tachyzoites (1 × 106) were inoculated onto confluent monolayers of the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HT-29, SLC35A1 single knockout HT-29 cells (SLC35A1-KO), or SLC35A1/EXTL3 double knockout HT-29 cells (SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO). The host cells were either untreated or pre-stimulated with 10 U/mL IFNγ for 24 h before infection. Following the addition of parasites, the plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 15 min. Non-attached parasites were removed by washing the cells with PBS. To visualize the attached tachyzoites, IFA was performed. The cells were fixed and stained with a primary antibody against SAG2A (rabbit, 1:2,000), followed by an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit, 1:2,000). The parasites in 15 random microscopic fields per sample were counted, and each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. For comparisons involving two variables (e.g., parasite strain and treatment condition), two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used. One-way ANOVA was applied when comparing multiple groups under a single condition. For all tests, P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent biological replicates unless otherwise indicated.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. John Boothroyd of Stanford University for providing rabbit anti-SAG1 and rabbit anti-SAG2A antibodies and Dr. Siyuan Ding of Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, for the HT-29, SLC35A1-KO, and SLC35A1/EXTL3-DKO cells.

O.C. was supported by a fellowship from Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF). This work in the Saeij lab was supported by grant R01AI173803 from NIAID. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Jeroen P. J. Saeij, Email: jsaeij@ucdavis.edu.

De'Broski R. Herbert, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00010-25.

Table S1. iai.00010-25-s0001.docx.

List of primers used.

iai.00010-25-s0001.docx (15.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/iai.00010-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lourido S. 2019. Toxoplasma gondii. Trends Parasitol 35:944–945. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. 2004. Toxoplasmosis. The Lancet 363:1965–1976. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Molan A, Nosaka K, Hunter M, Wang W. 2019. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii infection: systematic review and prevalence snapshots. Trop Biomed 36:898–925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lekutis C, Ferguson DJ, Grigg ME, Camps M, Boothroyd JC. 2001. Surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: variations on a theme. Int J Parasitol 31:1285–1292. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00261-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cérède O, Dubremetz JF, Soête M, Deslée D, Vial H, Bout D, Lebrun M. 2005. Synergistic role of micronemal proteins in Toxoplasma gondii virulence. J Exp Med 201:453–463. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wang Y, Yin H. 2014. Research progress on surface antigen 1 (SAG1) of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasit Vectors 7:180. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mineo JR, Kasper LH. 1994. Attachment of Toxoplasma gondii to host cells involves major surface protein, SAG-1 (P30). Exp Parasitol 79:11–20. doi: 10.1006/expr.1994.1054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Monteiro VG, Soares CP, de Souza W. 1998. Host cell surface sialic acid residues are involved on the process of penetration of Toxoplasma gondii into mammalian cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 164:323–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13105.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Baba M, Sato M, Kitoh K, Takashima Y. 2015. The distribution pattern of α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids affects host cell preference in Toxoplasma gondii. Exp Parasitol 155:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Carruthers VB, Håkansson S, Giddings OK, Sibley LD. 2000. Toxoplasma gondii uses sulfated proteoglycans for substrate and host cell attachment. Infect Immun 68:4005–4011. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.4005-4011.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhang D, Jiang N, Chen Q. 2019. ROP9, MIC3, and SAG2 are heparin-binding proteins in Toxoplasma gondii and involved in host cell attachment and invasion. Acta Trop 192:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Marchant J, Cowper B, Liu Y, Lai L, Pinzan C, Marq JB, Friedrich N, Sawmynaden K, Liew L, Chai W, Childs RA, Saouros S, Simpson P, Roque Barreira MC, Feizi T, Soldati-Favre D, Matthews S. 2012. Galactose recognition by the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. J Biol Chem 287:16720–16733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.325928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ortega-Barria E, Boothroyd JC. 1999. A Toxoplasma lectin-like activity specific for sulfated polysaccharides is involved in host cell infection. J Biol Chem 274:1267–1276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Garnett JA, Liu Y, Leon E, Allman SA, Friedrich N, Saouros S, Curry S, Soldati-Favre D, Davis BG, Feizi T, Matthews S. 2009. Detailed insights from microarray and crystallographic studies into carbohydrate recognition by microneme protein 1 (MIC1) of Toxoplasma gondii. Protein Sci 18:1935–1947. doi: 10.1002/pro.204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Xing M, Yang N, Jiang N, Wang D, Sang X, Feng Y, Chen R, Wang X, Chen Q. 2020. A sialic acid-binding protein SABP1 of Toxoplasma gondii mediates host cell attachment and invasion. J Infect Dis 222:126–135. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Besteiro S, Michelin A, Poncet J, Dubremetz J-F, Lebrun M. 2009. Export of a Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry neck protein complex at the host cell membrane to form the moving junction during invasion. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000309. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Khan IA, Ouellette C, Chen K, Moretto M. 2019. Toxoplasma: immunity and pathogenesis. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep 6:44–50. doi: 10.1007/s40588-019-0114-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Murillo-Léon M, Bastidas-Quintero AM, Steinfeldt T. 2024. Decoding Toxoplasma gondii virulence: the mechanisms of IRG protein inactivation. Trends Parasitol 40:805–819. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2024.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krishnamurthy S, Konstantinou EK, Young LH, Gold DA, Saeij JPJ. 2017. The human immune response to Toxoplasma: autophagy versus cell death. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006176. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Matta SK, Kohio HP, Chandra P, Brown A, Doench JG, Philips JA, Ding S, Sibley LD. 2024. Genome-wide and targeted CRISPR screens identify RNF213 as a mediator of interferon gamma-dependent pathogen restriction in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121:e2315865120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315865120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hernandez D, Walsh S, Saavedra Sanchez L, Dickinson MS, Coers J. 2022. Interferon-inducible E3 ligase RNF213 facilitates host-protective linear and K63-linked ubiquitylation of Toxoplasma gondii parasitophorous vacuoles. MBio 13:e0188822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01888-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Krishnamurthy S, Maru P, Wang Y, Bitew MA, Mukhopadhyay D, Yamaryo-Botté Y, Paredes-Santos TC, Sangaré LO, Swale C, Botté CY, Saeij JPJ. 2023. CRISPR screens identify Toxoplasma genes that determine parasite fitness in interferon gamma-stimulated human cells. MBio 14:e0006023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00060-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lockyer EJ, Torelli F, Butterworth S, Song O-R, Howell S, Weston A, East P, Treeck M. 2023. A heterotrimeric complex of Toxoplasma proteins promotes parasite survival in interferon gamma-stimulated human cells. PLoS Biol 21:e3002202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang Y, Sangaré LO, Paredes-Santos TC, Hassan MA, Krishnamurthy S, Furuta AM, Markus BM, Lourido S, Saeij JPJ. 2020. Genome-wide screens identify Toxoplasma gondii determinants of parasite fitness in IFNγ-activated murine macrophages. Nat Commun 11:5258. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18991-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Giuliano CJ, Wei KJ, Harling FM, Waldman BS, Farringer MA, Boydston EA, Lan TCT, Thomas RW, Herneisen AL, Sanderlin AG, Coppens I, Dvorin JD, Lourido S. 2024. CRISPR-based functional profiling of the Toxoplasma gondii genome during acute murine infection. Nat Microbiol 9:2323–2343. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01754-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tachibana Y, Hashizaki E, Sasai M, Yamamoto M. 2023. Host genetics highlights IFN-γ-dependent Toxoplasma genes encoding secreted and non-secreted virulence factors in in vivo CRISPR screens. Cell Rep 42:112592. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Park K, Scott AL. 2010. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase production by dendritic cells and macrophages is regulated by type I interferons. J Leukoc Biol 88:1081–1087. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0610318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Adams CM, Reitz J, De Brabander JK, Feramisco JD, Li L, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2004. Cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol inhibit activation of SREBPs by different mechanisms, both involving SCAP and Insigs. J Biol Chem 279:52772–52780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410302200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Robertson KA, Ghazal P. 2016. Interferon control of the sterol metabolic network: bidirectional molecular circuitry-mediating host protection. Front Immunol 7:634. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Coppens I, Joiner KA. 2003. Host but not parasite cholesterol controls Toxoplasma cell entry by modulating organelle discharge. Mol Biol Cell 14:3804–3820. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-12-0830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tahara M, Andrabi SBA, Matsubara R, Aonuma H, Nagamune K. 2016. A host cell membrane microdomain is a critical factor for organelle discharge by Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol Int 65:378–388. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Qiao W, Richards CM, Kim Y, Zengel JR, Ding S, Greenberg HB, Carette JE. 2024. MYADM binds human parechovirus 1 and is essential for viral entry. Nat Commun 15:3469. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47825-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chien Y-AA, Alford BK, Wasik BR, Weichert WS, Parrish CR, Daniel S. 2023. Single particle analysis of H3N2 influenza entry differentiates the impact of the sialic acids (Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc) on virus binding and membrane fusion. J Virol 97:e0146322. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01463-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Marques C, Poças J, Gomes C, Faria-Ramos I, Reis CA, Vivès RR, Magalhães A. 2022. Glycosyltransferases EXTL2 and EXTL3 cellular balance dictates heparan sulfate biosynthesis and shapes gastric cancer cell motility and invasion. J Biol Chem 298:102546. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wei X, Jia Z-S, Lian J-Q, Zhang Y, Li J, Ma L, Ye L, Wang J-P, Pan L, Wang P-Z, Bai X-F. 2009. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus infection by interferon-γ through downregulating claudin-1. J Interferon Cytokine Res 29:171–178. doi: 10.1089/jir.2008.0040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Dhawan S, Heredia A, Wahl LM, Epstein JS, Meltzer MS, Hewlett IK. 1995. Interferon-γ-induced downregulation of CD4 inhibits the entry of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in primary monocytes. Pathobiology 63:93–99. doi: 10.1159/000163939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fong C-Y, Lu L, Chen L-L, Yeung M-L, Zhang AJ, Zhao H, Yuen K-Y, To K-W. 2022. Interferon-gamma inhibits influenza A virus cellular attachment by reducing sialic acid cluster size. iScience 25:104037. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Abdelbaky HH, Rahman MM, Shimoda N, Chen Y, Hasan T, Ushio N, Nishikawa Y. 2023. Neospora caninum surface antigen 1 is a major determinant of the pathogenesis of neosporosis in nonpregnant and pregnant mice. Front Microbiol 14:1334447. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1334447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sidik SM, Huet D, Ganesan SM, Huynh M-H, Wang T, Nasamu AS, Thiru P, Saeij JPJ, Carruthers VB, Niles JC, Lourido S. 2016. A genome-wide CRISPR screen in Toxoplasma identifies essential apicomplexan genes. Cell 166:1423–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sangaré LO, Ólafsson EB, Wang Y, Yang N, Julien L, Camejo A, Pesavento P, Sidik SM, Lourido S, Barragan A, Saeij JPJ. 2019. In vivo CRISPR screen identifies TgWIP as a Toxoplasma modulator of dendritic cell migration. Cell Host Microbe 26:478–492. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jiang F, Doudna JA. 2017. CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys 46:505–529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. iai.00010-25-s0001.docx.

List of primers used.

iai.00010-25-s0001.docx (15.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/iai.00010-25.SuF1

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES