ABSTRACT
The joy of every mother is to survive a healthy pregnancy and give birth to a healthy baby. However, until today, many couples are finding it difficult to welcome a baby. Among the factors that cause infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is the microbiome composition that inhabits the vaginal space. These microbiomes occupying the vaginal space play a role in balancing acids, pH, and metabolites to ensure a healthy vaginal environment that can prevent pregnancy loss. What is even more evident is that these microbiomes, when dominated by Lactobacillus spp., prevent the growth of vaginal pathogens and reduce the risk of developing drug resistance. Although there is compelling evidence centered on the vaginal microbiome in promoting a healthy vagina, RPL is attributed to their altered or reduced Lactobacillus spp. While there are discrepancies in the literature, this review aimed to summarize the recent findings on vaginal microbiome and RPL. In addition, this mini review further revealed vaginal microbiota as biomarkers that can predict a healthy vagina and the risk of vaginal microbiome causing RPL. In addition, the immune response and metabolite changes in vaginal microbiome-related RPL, as well as some limitations to this intervention and prospective studies, are summarized.
KEYWORDS: recurrent pregnancy loss, vaginal microbiome, lactobacilli, metabolites, immune response
INTRODUCTION
The microbiome is a key factor that influences human health and disease in a variety of organs. While the gut microbiota has been extensively studied, other organs associated with microbiome medicine are now attracting attention. With the growing evidence for microbiome medicine, research into the vaginal microbiome is now gaining much ground with scientific evidence. Of note, this dynamic and intricate microecosystem changes microbiome composition due to menstrual life cycles and other environmental factors. To maintain a healthy vaginal microbiome, Lactobacillus with its antimicrobial products should dominate the reduced diversity. Moreover, these products released by Lactobacillus may prevent bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is a decline in vaginal commensals, including Lactobacillus. Studies show that this decline is associated with an influx of anaerobic microbes in the presence of lactic acid, which could have been utilized by Lactobacillus. Globally, BV is commonly associated with women of reproductive age and can lead to adverse gynecological and obstetric issues such as pelvic inflammatory disease, sexually transmitted diseases, and preterm birth. Among the BV patients, Gardnerella vaginalis, predominantly observed due to its polymicrobial biofilm properties, shelters other pathogens, thereby promoting the vaginal pathogen influx (1, 2).
As the vaginal microbiome is equally important to the health of the organ, its association with vaginal health is being explored and established based on specific taxa. This helps in identifying biomarkers that can predict any potential alterations. Even more interesting, however, is the recent research in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), and the vaginal microbiome is even more interesting (3). Another health benefit associated with the vaginal microbiome is seen in babies born through the vaginal canal without developing a risk of asthma during early life. Despite vaginal seeding, the gut microbiota of the infants born through cesarean delivery are still at risk of allergies, highlighting the importance of a healthy vaginal microbiome (4). In cows, a shift in the uterine microbiome with metritis is seen associated with pregnancy outcomes, especially at first insemination (5). Moreover, the increased obligate anaerobic, facultative bacteria and vaginal biofilm formation are typical of BV-associated Gardnerella spp. dominance. This vaginal biofilm may lead to ascending gynecological issues such as pregnancy-related infections, infertility, and preterm birth. Mechanistically, epithelial homeostasis induced by biofilm is altered, thereby promoting co-infections with sexually transmitted pathogens. This is exacerbated by the ineffectiveness of standard antibiotic therapy against these formed biofilms, leading to recurrent infections as “bacterial vaginosis syndrome” (6). Both the taxa and their physiological functions are crucial in determining BV-associated RPL (7). Although there are very important studies with clinically based evidence in medicine, a summary of these findings to make some meaningful biomarkers while suggesting prospective studies from some limitations is hopeful to make strong recommendations from this mini review.
VAGINAL MICROBIOME AS A BIOMARKER FOR RPL
Microbiome sampling of cervicovaginal specimens revealed Delftia and other unknown bacteria as a typical RPL phenotype. In addition, Microbacterium, Anaerobacillus, Chloroplast, and Streptococcus are prevalent in chorioamnionitis. Moreover, Anaerobacillus and Cutibacterium are typical bacterial biomarkers in women who eventually miscarry. In a sense, the cervicovaginal specimen is crucial for predicting the risk or causes of RPL, as the presence or absence of certain bacteria in this specimen is a biological indicator (8). Cervicovaginal specimens include bacteria, mucus, and metabolites present in the vaginal canal. With vaginal microbiota transplantation, successful pregnancy and delivery are achievable after a number of stillbirths or late pregnancy losses. However, the potential donor must be thoroughly screened for sexually transmitted diseases, and specifications must be determined using an in vitro microbiome competition assay (9).
In addition to reduced Lactobacillus, reduced lactic acid-producing bacteria and Bifidobacterium are typical vaginal secretion microbiota in women with chronic endometritis. These patients have a high abundance of Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Atopobium (10). The Herpesviridae family, specifically Epstein-Barr virus, is a biomarker for preterm birth from the microbiome of both the cervical canal and the uterine cavity. This comes from a study that revealed a strong association between RPL and chronic infection, noting preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes as a complication in addition to prolonged oligohydramnios (11). In addition to the reduced diversity and richness, reduced prevalence of Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma, with Lactobacillus abundance as an indicator of a healthy pregnancy, will help to predict any associated adverse pregnancy outcomes (12). Gardnerella vaginalis, but not Lactobacillus crispatus, is abundant in the RPL group when vaginal microbiome samples are taken. Moreover, fungi are abundantly present in vaginal endometrial samples, confirming that the vaginal microbiome is associated with RPL (13).
Korean women had anaerobic vaginal species, which may indicate a high risk of pregnancy loss and may result in preterm birth. Moreover, Lactobacillus crispatus, but not Lactobacillus iners, dominated the vaginal microbes associated with women with miscarriage, whereas the latter is a typical biomarker for term pregnancy (14). In addition, Lactobacillus iners, but not Lactobacillus acidophilus, is present in both vaginal and endometrial microbiota samples from women with RPL (15). There is evidence that Lactobacillus iners may favor the growth of other vaginal microbiome pathogens and thus complicate pregnancy. The quest to affirm Lactobacillus crispatus as a quintessential health-associated commensal will only hold if both inflammation and reduced vaginal diversity are observed. In addition, this species must not be tampered with during the gestation period and the health of the pregnant woman (16). The microbiome associated with unexplained aerobic vaginitis is typically found in RPL, and the most prevalent species are Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. This aerobic vaginitis is associated with low pH and enriched biofilm, which is strongly associated with multidrug resistance (17) (Fig. 1).
Fig 1.
Vaginal microbiome as a biomarker for RPL.
IMMUNE RESPONSE AND METABOLITE CHANGES IN VAGINAL MICROBIOMERELATED RPL
As pregnancy progresses, the reduced diversity of the vaginal microbiome with a characteristic of Lactobacillus is seen with a shift in vaginal metabolites. These metabolites, notably acetate, alcohols, propionate, and biogenic amines, are typical dysbiotic-associated metabolites. Moreover, at the end of the healthy pregnancy, healthy vaginal metabolites, such as lactate, phenylalanine, glycine, leucine, and isoleucine, are highly prevalent. The progressive vaginal leukocytes are associated with IL-6 and IL-8, and these are seen with vaginal symptoms. For instance, increased IL-8 is a predictor of vaginal Candida spp., which is a typical vaginal pathogen that is positively correlated with O-acetylcholine, glucose, choline, and 4-hydroxyphenyllactate levels. Moreover, glycine, serine, and lactate are negatively correlated with cytokine concentration (18).
Mobiluncus mulieris in BV can significantly increase TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 with changes in metabolites such as succinate and nicotinamide, as well as oxidative stress markers such as cysteinylglycine disulfide, 2-hydroxyglutarate, and cysteinylglycine. In addition, vaginal infection with Eggerthella sp. can elevate glycerolipids and sphingolipids, which are pivotal for epithelial barrier function. Moreover, biogenic amines such as cadaverine and putrescine are associated with increased vaginal amine odor, elevated vaginal pH, and abnormal discharge (19). In case of embryonic miscarriage, heightened IL-10 and IL-2 levels correlate with increased abundances of Lac_Roseburia, Fam_Finegoldia, and Lac_Coprococcus, suggesting a direct link between immune response and microbiota shifts (20). Cervicovaginal specimen immune profiles have also established Lactobacillus spp. depleted vaginal microbiota, linking to pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (21). With the influx of pro-inflammatory cytokines, endometrial and vaginal dysbiosis are studied to compromise the receptivity and integrity of endometrial mucosa, thereby hampering a successful implantation of the embryo. While this evidence is promising to bring a paradigm shift in reproductive medicine, its established association with adverse obstetric outcomes, such as RPL and repeated implantation failure, warrants careful consideration. The pathophysiological mechanism involves a dysregulated inflammatory cascade within the vaginal and endometrial microenvironments, wherein immune cell activation has been identified as a hallmark feature of RPL (22). Multiple etiological factors have been implicated in triggering this aberrant immune response, including gram-negative bacteria components, fungal pathogens, viral infections, and neoplastic processes. Of particular significance, bacterial metabolites contribute to immune dysregulation through molecular mimicry mechanisms, thereby potentiating pathological immune activation. Notably, gut microbiota may promote systemic inflammation via the recruitment and expansion of pro-inflammatory lymphocytes (Th1/Th12 subsets), concomitant suppression of tolerogenic NK cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs), and subsequent disruption of fetomaternal immune tolerance. Intriguingly, certain commensal microbiota, particularly Lactobacillus spp., demonstrate remarkable immunomodulatory potential capable of counteracting these deleterious effects. Compelling experimental evidence indicates that vaginal transplantation of Lactobacillus crispatus significantly enhances immunotolerant responses at the maternal-fetal interface, thereby improving pregnancy outcomes (23).
LIMITATIONS IN VAGINAL MICROBIOME ASSOCIATED WITH RPL
Although there are numerous breakthroughs and advanced bioinformatics tools to give robust analysis, human vaginal microbiome medicine faces persistent challenges in selecting optimal sequencing technology. This stems from ongoing methodological debates regarding conflicting analytical approaches (24). In addition, vaginal dysbiosis does not significantly influence the birth rate even though it poses a risk for early pregnancy loss (25). Moreover, fetal loss in the first trimester and its correlation with preterm birth rates with in vitro fertilization is not with significant evidence (26). There is an association between preterm rupture of membranes and BV; however, there are discrepancies regarding BV and pregnancy loss, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. This warrants further research into the environmental factors, such as climate variations and social status for women in response to BV-associated RPL (27). Moreover, the treatment regime, dosage, and duration for infertile couples could lead to altered vaginal microbiome, and thus may cause RPL (28).
PROSPECTS IN VAGINAL MICROBIOME ON RPL
Interventions to explore, in addition to the vaginal microbiome, include the endometrial microbiota and its association with the local endometrial microenvironment. This is evident on the principle of organ proximity, as the vaginal and endometrial niche may explain RPL (29). As part of targeted interventions in reproductive medicine, microbiome medicine spanning gut microbiome, endometrial and vaginal microbiome hold promise for addressing RPL. Thus, understanding the complexities and specifics of this unexplained diagnosis will confer effective reproductive health outcomes while minimizing high risks (30). Vaginal microbiome screening could enable a predictive targeted therapeutic approach not only for RPL but also for preventing miscarriage (31). A large cohort study combining gut and vaginal microbiome analyses in cases of early pregnancy loss and complications may reveal significant microbiome-associated gynecological issues (32).
The self-esteem of women, often affected by stigma when visiting gynecologists, may improve if self-swab collection becomes an option. However, this should be collected from the lower vaginal area, as other vaginal regions may harbor distinct microbiomes, thereby altering the sensitivity of the results (33). For instance, the cervix uteri microbiome holds promise for prognosis and also to prevent early miscarriages as part of RPL (34). Moreover, vaginal hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus and fastidious BV-associated bacteria increase the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease, which may contribute to RPL (35).
Unlike gut microbiota, increased diversity in the vaginal microbiome is not always indicative of health. It was believed that oral contraceptives or levonorgestrel intrauterine systems were associated with microbiome composition. However, the increased diversity in the vaginal microbiome is prominent during the menstrual cycle and subsequently reduced Lactobacillus spp. Metabolite changes, cytokines, and the menstrual cycle may modulate the transitional changes to the vaginal bacterial communities and even sub-communities. A Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal ecosystem confers significant biological and clinical benefits for pregnant women (36, 37).
As an indicator of follicular and luteal phases, this diversity is correlated with serum estradiol levels (38). Among the physiological changes associated with the vaginal microbiome is maternal stress, and this may predispose offspring to neurodevelopmental disorders. Moreover, the neonate gut microbiota alterations induce metabolite profile alterations such as amino acid and, to some extent, energy balance shift. However, questions still persist if maternal stress is a causation to maternal vaginal protein that is associated with vaginal immunity. Although a reduced vaginal Lactobacillus is reflecting on offspring alteration for this genus, it is not clear if this reduction is as a result of maternal stress or the stress causing the reduction (39).
In determining the vaginal microbiome to RPL, the analysis used may determine a lot. For instance, while Nugent score could not give any meaningful physiological changes, Bayesian network score revealed vaginal pH as associated with Gardnerella, Eggerthella, Ruminococcaceae, Sneathia, and Dialister, while vaginal itch, irritation, odor, yeast infection, and discharge are associated with Corynebacterium, Proteobacteria, and Lactobacillus jensenii. Moreover, none of ethnicity, age, or previous pregnancy is directly related to clinical BV (40, 41) (Fig. 2).
Fig 2.
Immune response, metabolite changes, limitations, and prospects in vaginal microbiome-associated with RPL.
CONCLUSION
The association or correlation of vaginal microbiome imbalance and RPL will require further studies that must see a large human cohort as a clinical trial to give much scientific grounds to the existing knowledge. For instance, each patient or woman will experience a distinct microbiome compositional alteration throughout the period of pregnancy. Since it will be cumbersome to ascertain the specific metabolites shift and immune response due to this dysbiotic vaginal microbiome, a uniform taxon in addition to increased lactobacilli as biomarkers is required. Moreover, the study participants should be screened before taking part in the trial and must ensure that other environmental factors, as well as genetic factors, are known prior to specimen analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge postdoctoral funding of Heilongjiang Province (LBH-Z21218) and Youth English Training Program of the Chinese Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine (202557-011).
Contributor Information
Xiaoling Feng, Email: doctorfengmen@163.com.
Kirk D. C. Jensen, University of California Merced, Merced, California, USA
REFERENCES
- 1. Chen X, Lu Y, Chen T, Li R. 2021. The female vaginal microbiome in health and bacterial vaginosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:631972. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.631972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kiecka A, Macura B, Szczepanik M. 2021. Can Lactobacillus spp. be a factor reducing the risk of miscarriage? Pol J Microbiol 70:431–446. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2021-043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Krog MC, Madsen ME, Bliddal S, Bashir Z, Vexø LE, Hartwell D, Hugerth LW, Fransson E, Hamsten M, Boulund F, Wannerberger K, Engstrand L, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Nielsen HS. 2022. The microbiome in reproductive health: protocol for a systems biology approach using a prospective, observational study design. Hum Reprod Open 2022:hoac015. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Liu Y, Li HT, Zhou SJ, Zhou HH, Xiong Y, Yang J, Zhou YB, Chen DJ, Liu JM. 2023. Effects of vaginal seeding on gut microbiota, body mass index, and allergy risks in infants born through cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 5:100793. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Figueiredo CC, Monteiro HF, Cunha F, Bisinotto DZ, Ruiz AR, Duarte GA, Ge Y, Lima FS, Mohamadzadeh M, Galvão KN, Bisinotto RS. 2024. Shifts in uterine microbiome associated with pregnancy outcomes at first insemination and clinical cure in dairy cows with metritis. Sci Rep 14:11864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61704-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Swidsinski S, Moll WM, Swidsinski A. 2023. Bacterial vaginosis-vaginal polymicrobial biofilms and dysbiosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 120:347–354. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Marrazzo JM. 2011. Interpreting the epidemiology and natural history of bacterial vaginosis: are we still confused? Anaerobe 17:186–190. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mori R, Hayakawa T, Hirayama M, Ozawa F, Yoshihara H, Goto S, Kitaori T, Ozaki Y, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. 2023. Cervicovaginal microbiome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Reprod Immunol 157:103944. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wrønding T, Vomstein K, Bosma EF, Mortensen B, Westh H, Heintz JE, Mollerup S, Petersen AM, Ensign LM, DeLong K, van Hylckama Vlieg JET, Thomsen AB, Nielsen HS. 2023. Antibiotic-free vaginal microbiota transplant with donor engraftment, dysbiosis resolution and live birth after recurrent pregnancy loss: a proof of concept case study. EClinicalMedicine 61:102070. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tanaka SE, Sakuraba Y, Kitaya K, Ishikawa T. 2022. Differential vaginal microbiota profiling in lactic-acid-producing bacteria between infertile women with and without chronic endometritis. Diagnostics (Basel) 12:878. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Barinov SV, Tirskaya YI, Kadsyna TV, Lazareva OV, Medyannikova IV, Tshulovski YI. 2022. Pregnancy and delivery in women with a high risk of infection in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 35:2122–2127. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1781810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Freitas AC, Chaban B, Bocking A, Rocco M, Yang S, Hill JE, Money DM, VOGUE Research Group . 2017. The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is less rich and diverse, with lower prevalence of Mollicutes, compared to non-pregnant women. Sci Rep 7:9212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07790-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Peuranpää P, Holster T, Saqib S, Kalliala I, Tiitinen A, Salonen A, Hautamäki H. 2022. Female reproductive tract microbiota and recurrent pregnancy loss: a nested case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online 45:1021–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chang DH, Shin J, Rhee MS, Park KR, Cho BK, Lee SK, Kim BC. 2020. Vaginal microbiota profiles of native Korean women and associations with high-risk pregnancy. J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:248–258. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1908.08016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Masucci L, D’Ippolito S, De Maio F, Quaranta G, Mazzarella R, Bianco DM, Castellani R, Inversetti A, Sanguinetti M, Gasbarrini A, Scambia G, Di Simone N. 2023. Celiac disease predisposition and genital tract microbiota in women affected by recurrent pregnancy loss. Nutrients 15:221. doi: 10.3390/nu15010221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Costello EK, DiGiulio DB, Robaczewska A, Symul L, Wong RJ, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK, Holmes SP, Kwon DS, Relman DA. 2023. Abrupt perturbation and delayed recovery of the vaginal ecosystem following childbirth. Nat Commun 14:4141. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39849-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ncib K, Bahia W, Leban N, Mahdhi A, Trifa F, Mzoughi R, Haddad A, Jabeur C, Donders G. 2022. Microbial diversity and pathogenic properties of microbiota associated with aerobic vaginitis in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Diagnostics (Basel) 12:2444. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Marangoni A, Laghi L, Zagonari S, Patuelli G, Zhu C, Foschi C, Morselli S, Pedna MF, Sambri V. 2021. New insights into vaginal environment during pregnancy. Front Mol Biosci 8:656844. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.656844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. McKenzie R, Maarsingh JD, Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2021. Immunometabolic analysis of Mobiluncus mulieris and Eggerthella sp. reveals novel insights into their pathogenic contributions to the hallmarks of bacterial vaginosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:759697. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.759697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Xu L, Huang L, Lian C, Xue H, Lu Y, Chen X, Xia Y. 2020. Vaginal microbiota diversity of patients with embryonic miscarriage by using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. Int J Genomics 2020:1764959. doi: 10.1155/2020/1764959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Grewal K, Lee YS, Smith A, Brosens JJ, Bourne T, Al-Memar M, Kundu S, MacIntyre DA, Bennett PR. 2022. Chromosomally normal miscarriage is associated with vaginal dysbiosis and local inflammation. BMC Med 20:38. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02227-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ye Z, Zhao J, Li R. 2022. Effects of immune cells and cytokines on the endometrial immune microenvironment in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Clin Med 2:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.gocm.2022.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Garmendia JV, De Sanctis CV, Hajdúch M, De Sanctis JB. 2024. Microbiota and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); more than a simple connection. Microorganisms 12:1641. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12081641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hugerth LW, Pereira M, Zha Y, Seifert M, Kaldhusdal V, Boulund F, Krog MC, Bashir Z, Hamsten M, Fransson E, Svarre-Nielsen H, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Engstrand L. 2020. Assessment of in vitro and in silico protocols for sequence-based characterization of the human vaginal microbiome. mSphere 5:e00448-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00448-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Skafte-Holm A, Humaidan P, Bernabeu A, Lledo B, Jensen JS, Haahr T. 2021. The association between vaginal dysbiosis and reproductive outcomes in sub-fertile women undergoing IVF-treatment: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis. Pathogens 10:295. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10030295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. 2013. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 28:1809–1815. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Juliana NCA, Suiters MJM, Al-Nasiry S, Morré SA, Peters RPH, Ambrosino E. 2020. The association between vaginal microbiota dysbiosis, bacterial vaginosis, and aerobic vaginitis, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of women living in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Front Public Health 8:567885. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.567885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Priskorn L, Tøttenborg SS, Almstrup K, Andersson A-M, Axelsson J, Bräuner EV, Elenkov A, Freiesleben N la C, Giwercman YL, Grøndahl ML, et al. 2021. RUBIC (ReproUnion Biobank and Infertility Cohort): a binational clinical foundation to study risk factors, life course, and treatment of infertility and infertility-related morbidity. Andrology (Los Angel) 9:1828–1842. doi: 10.1111/andr.13063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Odendaal J, Black N, Bennett PR, Brosens J, Quenby S, MacIntyre DA. 2024. The endometrial microbiota and early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod 39:638–646. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vomstein K, Krog MC, Wrønding T, Nielsen HS. 2024. The microbiome in recurrent pregnancy loss - a scoping review. J Reprod Immunol 163:104251. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2024.104251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Saadaoui M, Singh P, Ortashi O, Al Khodor S. 2023. Role of the vaginal microbiome in miscarriage: exploring the relationship. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1232825. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1232825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chen X, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Si C, Zhang H, Huang X, Luo S, Deng G, Gao J. 2022. Microbiome characteristics in early threatened miscarriage study (MCETMS): a study protocol for a prospective cohort investigation in China. BMJ Open 12:e057328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Taebi M, Kariman N, Montazeri A, Alavi Majd H. 2021. Infertility stigma: a qualitative study on feelings and experiences of infertile women. Int J Fertil Steril 15:189–196. doi: 10.22074/IJFS.2021.139093.1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lebedeva OP, Popov VN, Syromyatnikov MY, Starkova NN, Maslov AY, Kozarenko ON, Gryaznova MV. 2023. Female reproductive tract microbiome and early miscarriages. APMIS 131:61–76. doi: 10.1111/apm.13288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mitchell C, Fredricks D, Agnew K, Hitti J. 2015. Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli are associated with lower levels of vaginal interleukin-1β, independent of bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 42:358–363. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Symul L, Jeganathan P, Costello EK, France M, Bloom SM, Kwon DS, Ravel J, Relman DA, Holmes S. 2023. Sub-communities of the vaginal microbiota in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Proc Biol Sci 290:20231461. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ji L, Peng C, Bao X. 2022. Effect of vaginal flora on clinical outcome of frozen embryo transfer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:987292. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.987292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Krog MC, Hugerth LW, Fransson E, Bashir Z, Nyboe Andersen A, Edfeldt G, Engstrand L, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Nielsen HS. 2022. The healthy female microbiome across body sites: effect of hormonal contraceptives and the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 37:1525–1543. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jasarevic E, Howerton CL, Howard CD, Bale TL. 2015. Alterations in the vaginal microbiome by maternal stress are associated with metabolic reprogramming of the offspring gut and brain. Endocrinology 156:3265–3276. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Noyes N, Cho KC, Ravel J, Forney LJ, Abdo Z. 2018. Associations between sexual habits, menstrual hygiene practices, demographics and the vaginal microbiome as revealed by Bayesian network analysis. PLoS One 13:e0191625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Song SD, Acharya KD, Zhu JE, Deveney CM, Walther-Antonio MRS, Tetel MJ, Chia N. 2020. Daily vaginal microbiota fluctuations associated with natural hormonal cycle, contraceptives, diet, and exercise. mSphere 5:e00593-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00593-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


