Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Couns Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;52(7):1070–1112. doi: 10.1177/00110000241275190

Table 2.

Model Fit Estimates from the CAGI-NA Exploratory Factor Analysis.

Model χ2 (df) CFI TLI RMSEA [90% CI] SRMR Δχ2 (df) ΔCFI Cumulative % of variance
1 factor 2037.530 (464) 0.666 0.643 .120 [0.102–0.112] 0.126 27.33%
2 factors 1063.620 (433) 0.886 0.847 0.070 [0.064–0.075] 0.052 973.910 (31)* 0.220 43.43%
3 factors 822.350 (403) 0.911 0.919 0.054 [0.053–0.065] 0.040 241.270 (30)* 0.025 48.55%
4 factors 639.370 (374) 0.921 0.924 0.043 [0.042–0.055] 0.032 182.980 (29)* 0.020 51.80%
5 factors 527.705 (346) 0.945 0.945 0.042 [0.035–0.049] 0.027 111.665 (28)* 0.016 54.81%
6 factors 444.365 (319) 0.957 0.959 0.036 [0.028–0.044] 0.024 83.34 (27)* 0.012 57.33%
7 factors 382.355 (293) 0.965 0.967 0.032 [0.022–0.040] 0.022 62.010 (26)* 0.008 59.77%

Note. CAGI-NA = Complicated and Adaptive Grief Inventory for Native Americans. The 7 factors had Eigenvalues ≥ 1. The four-factor solution was selected as the best fit for the CAGI-NA. However, factor one and factor two in this model were highly correlated and represented theoretically similar constructs; therefore, they were merged into a single factor.