Table 2.
Model Fit Estimates from the CAGI-NA Exploratory Factor Analysis.
| Model | χ2 (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA [90% CI] | SRMR | Δχ2 (df) | ΔCFI | Cumulative % of variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 factor | 2037.530 (464) | 0.666 | 0.643 | .120 [0.102–0.112] | 0.126 | 27.33% | ||
| 2 factors | 1063.620 (433) | 0.886 | 0.847 | 0.070 [0.064–0.075] | 0.052 | 973.910 (31)* | 0.220 | 43.43% |
| 3 factors | 822.350 (403) | 0.911 | 0.919 | 0.054 [0.053–0.065] | 0.040 | 241.270 (30)* | 0.025 | 48.55% |
| 4 factors | 639.370 (374) | 0.921 | 0.924 | 0.043 [0.042–0.055] | 0.032 | 182.980 (29)* | 0.020 | 51.80% |
| 5 factors | 527.705 (346) | 0.945 | 0.945 | 0.042 [0.035–0.049] | 0.027 | 111.665 (28)* | 0.016 | 54.81% |
| 6 factors | 444.365 (319) | 0.957 | 0.959 | 0.036 [0.028–0.044] | 0.024 | 83.34 (27)* | 0.012 | 57.33% |
| 7 factors | 382.355 (293) | 0.965 | 0.967 | 0.032 [0.022–0.040] | 0.022 | 62.010 (26)* | 0.008 | 59.77% |
Note. CAGI-NA = Complicated and Adaptive Grief Inventory for Native Americans. The 7 factors had Eigenvalues ≥ 1. The four-factor solution was selected as the best fit for the CAGI-NA. However, factor one and factor two in this model were highly correlated and represented theoretically similar constructs; therefore, they were merged into a single factor.