Table 3.
Comparison between our model and reference models (mean ± STD). The bolded results are the best results obtained on the test set of the RTUI. The symbol ‘*’ indicates that there is a significant difference between our model and the compared model under the paired t test on the corresponding metric (p-value ≤ 0.05), and the values in parentheses refer to Cohen’s d values between our model and the compared models
| DSC (%) | HD95 | MIoU (%) | MPA (%) | Time/ms | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SegNet [33] | 72.46 ± 21.6*(0.218) | 29.79 ± 23.21*(0.201) | 68.07 ± 13.36*(0.326) | 86.54 ± 12.22 | 7.525 |
| U-Net [4] | 71.46 ± 19.95*(0.334) | 33.18 ± 24.74*(0.346) | 66.73 ± 12.93*(0.479) | 86.0 ± 11.21*(0.249) | 4.538 |
| U-Net + + [6] | 73.5 ± 19.78*(0.208) | 33.25 ± 25.31*(0.336) | 68.55 ± 13.68*(0.306) | 85.94 ± 11.71*(0.229) | 11.891 |
| AAU-Net [20] | 71.7 ± 24.79*(0.267) | 31.78 ± 26.74*(0.233) | 68.22 ± 15.46*(0.26) | 84.86 ± 13.86*(0.256) | 29.531 |
| CeNet [15] | 70.38 ± 22.21*(0.329) | 33.79 ± 26.09*(0.346) | 66.6 ± 13.26*(0.44) | 83.95 ± 13.09*(0.388) | 8.860 |
| SwinUnet [14] | 67.15 ± 20.53*(0.507) | 34.55 ± 26.61*(0.38) | 62.97 ± 13.42*(0.7) | 83.07 ± 12.94*(0.441) | 17.297 |
| DAEformer [12] | 69.75 ± 24.22*(0.359) | 31.32 ± 24.33*(0.267) | 67.08 ± 14.14*(0.398) | 83.17 ± 13.34*(0.5) | 27.633 |
| TransUnet [13] | 72.04 ± 23.12*(0.224) | 28.54 ± 23.73 | 67.99 ± 14.64*(0.289) | 86.14 ± 12.57 | 26.645 |
| Deeplabv3 + [7] | 70.57 ± 23.08*(0.288) | 29.94 ± 23.22*(0.2) | 67.91 ± 15.22*(0.282) | 84.41 ± 13.05*(0.367) | 8.402 |
| Our model | 75.49 ± 21.26 | 24.75 ± 23.59 | 71.46 ± 14.42 | 87.41 ± 11.69 | 26.715 |