Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 11;38(4):2229–2240. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01358-6

Table 4.

Comparison between our model and reference models (mean ± STD). The bolded results were the best results obtained on the external validation. The symbol ‘*’ indicates that there is a significant difference between our model and the compared model under the paired t test on the corresponding metric (p-value ≤ 0.05), and the values in parentheses refer to Cohen’s d values between our model and the compared models

Models DSC (%) HD95 MIoU (%) MPA (%)
SegNet 80.49 ± 19.86 28.87 ± 29.13 75.4 ± 18.44 89.8 ± 10.47
U-Net 77.6 ± 19.78 30.21 ± 25.77 72.47 ± 19.74* 89.58 ± 10.36
Unet +  +  78.43 ± 19.05 28.55 ± 25.62 73.51 ± 19.01 89.03 ± 10.64
AAU-Net 75.69 ± 23.92*(0.269) 36.04 ± 29.29 72.13 ± 21.05*(0.293) 86.64 ± 12.92*(0.341)
CeNet 74.25 ± 25.28*(0.301) 32.72 ± 28.34 72.12 ± 20.32*(0.321) 87.38 ± 12.25*(0.307)
Swin 75.44 ± 21.71*(0.339) 37.16 ± 33.63*(0.331) 71.51 ± 20.06*(0.357) 86.59 ± 11.93*(0.45)
DAE 76.93 ± 21.51*(0.233) 31.72 ± 28.99 73.07 ± 18.96*(0.261) 87.97 ± 10.18*(0.25)
TransUnet 78.25 ± 21.69 35.83 ± 32.25 73.81 ± 19.54 88.41 ± 11.1
Deeplabv3 +  74.36 ± 23.11*(0.453) 38.54 ± 37.21*(0.271) 70.55 ± 21.1*(0.54) 85.71 ± 12.82*(0.6)
Our model 80.56 ± 17.45 28.4 ± 26.65 76.01 ± 20.05 89.59 ± 9.61