ABSTRACT
Continuous advances in technologies ranging from deep sequencing and genetic manipulation to mass spectrometry, single cell imaging, and structural biology have led to previously unimaginable advances in our understanding of microbial physiology and the molecular mechanisms underlying microbial responses in a multitude of environments. Simultaneously, these advances are revealing how much more there is to learn. At the 2024 virtual retreat of the Molecular Biology and Physiology (MBP) Community of the Council on Microbial Sciences (COMS) of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), eight early-career investigators, along with retreat attendees, discussed some of these astounding advances, as well as the challenges and opportunities the developments raise. Motivated by these discussions, we review the state-of-the-art in molecular microbiology and provide an outlook on this field. Our hope is that the topics discussed here can serve as an inspiration for the development of future technologies, resources, and guidelines and for the training of the next generation of microbiologists.
KEYWORDS: multi-omic data, genome-scale mutagenesis, non-model microbes, microbial communities, single-cell sequencing, single-cell microscopy, macromolecular structures
INTRODUCTION
The first two bacterial genomes were sequenced nearly 30 years ago (1, 2). The cost of one of those sequences, that of Haemophilus influenzae, was over 1,000,000 U.S. dollars and took multiple years (2). Today, a whole bacterial genome can be sequenced for less than 100 U.S. dollars in hours. The exponential decrease in sequencing costs and time has led to an exponential increase in the number of sequenced genomes. As a result, over 1.9 million bacterial genomes are now available in databases such as AllTheBacteria (3), along with vast amounts of information in multi-omic data sets. In addition to the exponential increase of sequencing data and data from other omics techniques, there have been momentous changes in the analyses of single cells and macromolecular structures. This amazing wealth of data and the changing methodologies open new opportunities for understanding microorganisms, microbial communities, and their responses to and impacts on different environments. At the same time, these developments point to new challenges that remain to be solved. It is these opportunities and challenges for research in microbial molecular biology and physiology that we discuss here (see Table S1 for overview of websites in italics and Box 1 for definitions of underlined words).
Box 1. Glossary.
Allelic exchange: a process by which deletions, substitutions or mutations are introduced into a DNA sequence by homologous recombination.
Arrayed (ordered) mutant collection: a large set of pure cultures of distinct mutant strains stored in a format that is compatible with high-throughput liquid handling systems. The identity and location of mutants within the collection are known, facilitating high-throughput tests for genotype-phenotype relationships without the need to simultaneously track the genotype of each culture.
Combinatorial indexing: scRNA-seq technology in which the RNA in each cell is marked by a unique combination of barcodes added during multiple iterations of splitting pools of cells.
CRISPRi-seq: an approach to identify gene function by using CRISPRi to lower the expression of genes and screen or select for altered phenotypes. CRISPRi is a loss-of-function approach. Individual strains are quantified in a pool through sequencing the guide RNA.
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM): a technique that enables near-atomic resolution three-dimensional structure determination by using an electron microscope to image thin, vitrified samples.
DNA barcode: a short, unique DNA sequence introduced into a strain to facilitate tracking through sequencing.
Dub-seq (dual-barcoded shotgun expression library sequencing): an approach to identify gene function by expressing genomic DNA fragments in a host organism followed by screening or selecting for new phenotypes. This is a gain-of-function mutagenesis approach. Individual expression library fragments are quantified using barcode sequencing.
Functional genomics: a field of study with a broadly defined goal of connecting genotype to phenotype by leveraging information in the complete genome sequence of an organism. One common functional-genomic approach is to associate a phenotype with gene content across a set of related strains to identify the responsible genes. Another functional-genomic approach is to employ genome-scale mutagenesis in a single strain to comprehensively identify all genes associated with a phenotype.
Gain-of-function mutagenesis: mutagenesis approach that results in a new or enhanced function of a gene product.
Genotype: the complete DNA content of an organism, typically defined through the mutations that differentiate a strain from wild type.
Light-sheet microscopy: a fluorescence imaging technique in which a thin sheet of light is used to illuminate a sample. Computational assembly of a stack of light sheet images allows for three-dimensional reconstruction of the image.
Loss-of-function mutagenesis: Mutagenesis approach that reduces or eliminates the function of a gene product.
Model organism: a strain chosen to represent a larger taxonomic group or set of phenotypes. The strain is shared as a common experimental subject among a research community. Model organisms are chosen for ease of manipulation, genetic tractability, and simplicity.
Multicollinearity: a statistical phenomenon where strong correlations exist among predictor variables, such as genes or platforms in multi-platform data. This can complicate joint analyses by inflating variances of estimated coefficients, reducing the reliability and interpretability of the results.
Multi-omic data: paired high-throughput functional readouts, which could include, for example, metagenomic analysis of microbial communities and metabolomic profiling.
Nanoliter droplet barcoding: scRNA-seq technology in which cells are separated into individual droplets and the RNA in each droplet is associated with a different barcode.
Phenotype: any observable trait of an organism.
Pooled mutant collection: A mixed culture comprised of many mutant strains.
RB-TnSeq (randomly barcoded transposon sequencing): an approach to identify gene function through random insertion of transposons across the genome followed by screening or selecting for altered phenotypes. Transposon insertions can lead to both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutants, but loss-of-function transposon insertion mutations are more common. Individual transposon insertion strains are quantified using barcode sequencing.
Recombineering: a process by which deletions, substitutions or other mutations are introduced into a DNA sequence by homologous recombination, often relying on the phage Lambda Red recombination proteins.
Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq): sequencing RNA from individual cells.
Strain domestication: the process by which organisms are adapted to the laboratory environment, either through targeted mutagenesis or selection. Domestication often leads to easier manipulation of organisms in the lab (increased growth rate, increased transformability, decreased multi-cellular behaviors) but can be associated with the loss of traits important for survival in the natural environment.
Super-resolution microscopy: a microscopy approach that relies on deconvoluting the individual fluorescent signals to image subcellular dynamics in greater detail than what is achieved by optical microscopy.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STANDARDIZATION, INTEGRATION, AND GENERATION OF LARGE DATA SETS
The volumes of genome sequencing data available now provide clearer resolution of the genetic diversity of all microorganisms. These data have created new areas of study, realigned phylogenetic trees, and suggested novel methodologies for the rapid detection of microorganisms. The benefits of whole-genome sequencing are evident in many studies in microbiology. In addition to knowing the genomic sequences of millions of microbes, there is ever-expanding information about the transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic profiles of many bacteria. The aggregated analyses of these multi-omic data sets can provide insights into many fundamental questions in microbial molecular biology and physiology, ranging from how polymicrobial communities respond to antibiotics (4–6) to the mechanistic roles of bacterial metabolism in infection and disease progression (7–9). Although these advances are tremendous, several further developments would allow the information gained from these omics approaches to be realized even more fully.
Standardizing information for large data sets
As the quality, speed, and efficiency of the data generated by whole-genome sequencing and other omics techniques has increased, the ability to keep the resulting data sets current with error correction and updated annotation has fallen behind. Errors in gene annotation plague all genome sequencing data. Some of the problems are due to old information, which, even when updated in new studies, may not yet be reflected in the annotations. Some omissions are due to suppositions about the nature and size of genetic elements. Other errors are due to assumptions based on sequence homology with other organisms. Although sequence homology frequently is a good indication of function, until the appropriate follow-up studies are performed, the annotation needs to be malleable. In all cases, the data underlying different annotations should be made clear.
In the future, it would be optimal to have a centralized, automated system, imposed during the peer-review publication process, which would allow appropriate updating of genome annotation. As published genomes become available in the NCBI GenBank database, an ideal first step would be to continuously update the annotation based on the most recent findings regarding the functions of the various genes. There are enormous benefits to continuous updates to genome annotation, including a more accurate pangenome reference for each species. This would allow for the easy comparison of gene function regardless of the strain used for the initial studies. Such an up-to-date pangenome reference would greatly facilitate genome studies of clinical isolates or environmental samples. A centralized system enabling easy updates to pangenome annotation also would allow finer resolution of genome differences and expand our understanding of the evolution of microorganisms.
Admittedly, substantial bioinformatics work would be required to update annotations to accurately reflect publications prior to the implementation of an automated system. Additionally, there needs to be consideration of the ways to assess and report data quality. Nevertheless, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) undoubtedly could aid this process, and—given the importance of annotations for advancing our scientific understanding—this work will be worth the effort.
Improvements to and standardization of metadata—the description of the samples, collection methodologies, and experimental conditions associated with each data set—are also needed. Several data repositories have their own standards, but comparisons of metadata across platforms can be challenging. Looking ahead, there are significant opportunities to deepen the insights derived from multi-omic studies by enhancing the standardization of data collection, annotation, and statistical analysis methods. Numerous reviews have detailed best practices in areas such as sample preparation, optimal read coverage for sequence-based methods, targeted and untargeted metabolite protein profiling, data wrangling (the conversion of raw data into more usable formats), data heterogeneity, power analysis, and the use of bioinformatic tools for various omics approaches (reviewed in references 10–12). Compliance with standards outlined in the Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations (MIBBI) project will similarly facilitate consistent collection and storage of experimental metadata.
Integrating multi-omic data
Typically, multi-omic studies employ, at minimum, paired high-throughput functional readouts. This might include, for example, metagenomic analyses of microbial communities with metabolomic profiling. Sequenced-based high-throughput profiling methods and functional-omics approaches, such as metabolomics and proteomics studies, have distinct considerations regarding limitations in data collection, processing, and interpretation (reviewed in references 13, 14). However, these data can all be transformed and aggregated into tabular format, enabling integrated or multi-table statistical analyses (reviewed in references 15, 16). Such analyses have led to exciting insights. For example, metagenomic, meta-transcriptomic, metabolomics, and X-ray crystallography data resulted in the discovery of carbohydrate-active enzymes that the capybara rodent gut microbiome uses to depolymerize otherwise recalcitrant lignocellulose (17). Identification of this enzymatic mechanism is a significant step toward the conversion of lignocellulose into biofuels that can serve as an alternative to fossil fuels. In the area of human health, multi-omic profiling of a human cohort with ulcerative colitis led to the finding of a bacterial strain capable of metabolizing a common immunosuppressive drug and producing immunomodulatory metabolites (18). Going forward, multi-table statistical analyses of multi-omic data will play an important role in increasing our understanding of molecular mechanisms of and predicting the outcomes of all processes involving microbes, including disease.
Multi-omic studies use a wide variety of statistical methods, including univariate, multivariate, and machine-learning techniques. Principal component analysis is a commonly used multivariate method that maximizes variance within a data set. Other multivariate methods, such as canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares, are designed to directly characterize covariance across different tabular omic data sets within a study. For example, canonical correlation analysis was combined with other statistical analysis approaches to identify multi-omic modules linked to insulin resistance (19). As another example, sparse canonical correspondence analysis led to the identification of associations between microbial species and clinical variables of participants in a multifactorial study of well-being (20), exemplifying the value of analyzing count and continuous data (reviewed in reference 15). Network-based methods or multi-block data integration techniques can also identify co-expressed features that are predictive of disease, even if individual features are not informative on their own (21) (reviewed in reference 22). While there is no one-size-fits-all approach, applying appropriate statistical methods tailored to the specific structure and goals of such multi-omic data sets can greatly enhance the robustness and interpretability of findings. Standardizing these methods, incorporating module-level analysis, and addressing cross-omic dependencies, particularly multicollinearity (reviewed in reference 23) will be critical in advancing the field and translating multi-omic data into biological insights that can be tested by other experimental approaches.
Improving the collection of large data sets
Genomics and other omics data additionally will benefit from continued improvements to experimental technology. For example, advances in sequencing read length will provide more reliable genomic sequences, particularly for regions with many repeats. Similarly, improved data collection and analyses will allow more proteins and small molecules to be detected by mass spectrometric approaches. Within metabolomics studies, there have been exciting advancements in both the targeted and untargeted identification of metabolites, especially metabolites identified from host-associated microbial communities (24, 25). However, for bioactive metabolites associated with health status, such as products of aromatic amino acid metabolism, it remains unclear whether they originate from gut microbial pathways, host pathways, or a combination of both (reviewed in reference 26). This uncertainty limits our understanding of the roles microbial production plays in various biological processes. As we will discuss next, another desirable advance is the ability to genetically modify a greater number of microorganisms, which will aid in assessing improved technologies for data collection and help to address ambiguities such as the origin of biologically active metabolites.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GENETIC TOOL KIT
One critical challenge in the post-genomic era is extracting functional information from available data sets to answer basic biological questions and provide avenues for improving host and environmental health. An essential step in this process is assigning functions to newly discovered genes, the majority of which remain uncharacterized.
Increasing the ability to genetically manipulate a greater number of organisms
There are a number of established solutions to the problem of assigning function to specific genes, including predictions based on protein sequence homology (reviewed in reference 27), genomic context (28), and, most recently, predicted structural homology (29). While the scale and speed of these approaches are unquestionable advantages, experimental validation remains the gold standard (reviewed in reference 30). Historically, the microbiology field focused on in-depth studies of specific model organism strains from a limited number of species. One of the driving factors behind this trend was the availability of powerful genetic tools that allow for quick and simple genome manipulation. Although genomics opened the door to a variety of non-model organisms and strains, effective genetic tools are desperately needed to functionally characterize unexpected biological phenomena associated with these organisms.
Developing genetic systems to manipulate and characterize the genomes of many newly sequenced bacteria remains a formidable challenge. The most immediate hurdle is that most bacteria are difficult to culture or have not been grown in a laboratory setting (31), making genetic manipulation challenging. Recent approaches have bypassed the need for culture by manipulating bacteria directly within their microbial communities using phage-derived particles, conjugation, or electroporation to deliver editing systems (32, 33). Nevertheless, improving cultivability would greatly accelerate the possibility of manipulating bacterial genomes. An increasing number of innovative approaches are being applied to the growth of difficult-to-culture bacteria (reviewed in reference 34) although these often involve focused efforts on individual taxa or strains.
For bacteria that can be cultured, a variety of methods exist to potentially enable genetic manipulations, including allelic exchange (35, 36), recombineering (37–39), and various CRISPR-based tools (40, 41). These techniques can be very powerful in select organisms but face challenges in many other microbes that prevent their widespread adoption. For example, recombineering using Lambda Red (with components from bacteriophage Lambda) has transformed genome editing in Escherichia coli, but its reliance on host factors has limited its application to other organisms (42, 43). Despite widespread efforts (44, 45), few recombineering systems have matched the effectiveness of Lambda Red. Multiple issues plague other genome editing approaches, including portability, nucleic acid delivery, and toxicity. Innovative solutions are needed to enable efficient, straightforward, and rapid genetic manipulation across a wide range of previously un-editable bacteria. Conceivably, the ever-growing catalog of microbial genomic information will inspire novel ways to address these obstacles.
Improving the ability to connect genotype to phenotype on a larger scale
Expanding beyond the targeted manipulation of individual genes, much can be learned from genome-scale mutagenesis technologies with the potential to connect genotype to phenotype on a massive scale and interrogate entire genomes and even pan-genomes in a single experiment. One of the key drivers of advances in genome-scale genetic analyses is once again the ever-lowering cost and increasing depth of sequencing. Three technologies are particularly useful outside of well-established model organisms: Dub-seq (dual-barcoded shotgun expression library sequencing, an update to expression library screens) (46), RB-TnSeq (randomly-barcoded transposon sequencing, an update to transposon mutagenesis) (47), and CRISPRi-seq (a genome-scale CRISPRi sequencing approach) (reviewed in reference 48). For each of these technologies, large pools of mutants are generated and subjected to growth in an experimental condition of interest. Sequencing of the pools before and after the treatment reveals mutants that are enriched or depleted by the experimental condition (reviewed in reference 49).
Dub-seq (46) is a gain-of-function mutagenesis approach that involves the ectopic expression of foreign genome fragments in a host organism followed by screening for novel phenotypes introduced by the new DNA. Dub-seq operates on a massive scale and overcomes challenges with genetic tractability and cultivability of the target organisms of interest. In one example, Dub-seq was used to identify novel carbohydrate utilization pathways across a pan-genome of species from the Bacteroidales order (50). Although such expression library screens suffer from drawbacks, including false negative results, technologies like Dub-seq allow the rapid identification of genes with defined functions from within complex microbial communities.
RB-TnSeq is a loss-of-function mutagenesis technology based on the random insertion of transposons across the genome of a target organism. DNA barcodes incorporated into the transposons lower the cost and effort of sequencing library preparation and distinguish RB-TnSeq from approaches like TnSeq and INSeq (reviewed in references 51, 52). A tour de force study using RB-TnSeq profiled genome-wide fitness effects in >30 Pseudomonadota across hundreds of growth environments, leading to the identification of novel metabolism and antibiotic resistance genes (53). RB-TnSeq likely will be a powerful first approach in genome-scale studies of new microbes although widespread adoption may be hampered by the need for high-efficiency transformation protocols.
CRISPRi-seq is a genome-scale loss-of-function mutagenesis approach that employs knockdown of gene expression using a catalytically dead CRISPR-Cas9 and a diverse pool of guide RNAs (reviewed in references 48, 54). Once a CRISPRi toolkit has been established in an organism, it provides a tunable and highly adaptable platform for genome-scale loss-of-function studies (55, 56). However, deleterious CRISPRi phenotypes can be unstable due to suppressor mutations, limiting the types of experiments in which these phenotypes can be measured.
All the technologies reviewed above focus on tracking strain abundance in pooled mutant collections using deep sequencing, which offers significant scale and cost benefits. However, pooled collections cannot capture all phenotypes, especially those that do not alter the relative abundance of a strain under the selection conditions. A well-established strategy to overcome this limitation has been to isolate and array a library of single mutant strains from pooled collections (57–61) and individually test the arrayed mutants for specific phenotypes (62–68). Early projects creating genome-scale ordered mutant collections in E. coli and S. cerevisiae (69, 70), in which nearly every non-essential gene in the genome is represented by a mutant located in a defined position in a set of multi-well plates, demonstrated the broad utility of this type of resource. However, the high costs of assembling these collections from scratch (reviewed in reference 71) have limited them to a few model organisms with large research communities. This limitation is being overcome by workflows that enable efficient conversion from pooled to ordered genome-scale mutant collections, thereby reducing the cost and effort required by orders of magnitude (72, 73). This will likely lead to an explosion in the availability of ordered mutant collections.
Arrayed (ordered) mutant collections enable researchers to incorporate functional genomics into the multi-omic approaches that are revolutionizing microbiology. Recent examples of discoveries made possible by ordered collections include the identification of genes responsible for drug metabolism (74) and small molecule production (75) from the human microbiome (functional genomics combined with metabolomics) as well as the discovery of the genetic determinants of cell shape (61, 72, 75) (functional genomics paired with single-cell microscopy) and genetic factors influencing TLR2-dependent innate immune signaling (76) (functional genomics alongside host signaling studies).
As development in this area continues, ongoing innovation will further reduce costs and improve the quality of future ordered mutant collections, making these genetic resources a particularly exciting and promising approach for accelerating advances in microbiology. Combining these genetic approaches with resources such as the forthcoming Microbial Molecular Phenotyping Capability (M2PC) (77), which is being designed to offer an extensive array of automated phenotyping instrumentation, will accelerate our ability to generate functional knowledge about bacteria and their communities.
DEVELOPMENTS IN STUDIES OF NON-MODEL MICROBES AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES
Concurrent with the need to genetically manipulate more diverse microorganisms, there is a demand for advances in establishing more species as “model organisms,” studying microbes in their native environments, and examining communities comprised of multiple microbes.
Establishing new model organisms
The criteria for establishing a model organism have not changed substantially over time: ease of cultivation, genetic tractability, and relevance to the biological phenomena we wish to understand. Model organisms have greatly accelerated our mechanistic understanding of important biological processes and served as a focal point for research groups asking related questions. However, the process of establishing a model system can lead to significant differences between the resulting model strain (one that can easily be manipulated in the lab), termed strain domestication, and representative isolates from the natural environment. Changes can include decreased adhesion or reduced biofilm production, as illustrated for Bacillus subtilis (78, 79). Additionally, there are still relatively few model microbes compared to the vast number in ecological systems. The advances outlined in the previous sections raise the intriguing possibility that future model organisms could be established without extensive strain domestication and be based on a foundation of genome-scale genetic toolkits and integrated multi-omic data sets.
A recent effort to establish a model organism for the infant gut microbiome (75) provides a potential preview for this process. Starting with a transformable strain of a Bifidobacterium, which represents the most abundant genus in many healthy infant guts, transformation efficiency was increased to allow the creation of a hyper-saturated transposon-insertion pool. This pool was converted to a genome-scale ordered collection and then interrogated with a multi-omic approach that integrated chemical genomics, mass spectrometry, growth curves, time courses of host colonization, and single-cell imaging, leading to new insights into the establishment and function of the infant gut microbiome (75).
The extent and speed at which these “new” model bacterial systems will be adopted by the larger research community remains to be seen. Historically, scientists establishing their own groups inherit strains from their mentors, and research communities build up over decades as part of professional lineages. Accelerating new model organism adoption will require contemporaneous sharing of resources between labs. For this to happen, the research community needs to overcome both inertia in sharing due to efforts expended on distinct species or strains and logistical challenges for distributing these resources quickly and at scale. Another solution would be to establish a computational framework for automatically translating information on gene function between related species, blurring the distinctions between model and non-model species. Frameworks merging comparative genomics with genome-scale metabolic models (80, 81) and multi-omic data sets (82) are laudable advances towards this goal.
Increasing the ability to study microbial communities
The study of model microorganisms has led to tremendous advances not only in microbiology, but in numerous other fields including molecular biology, biochemistry, and cellular biology (83). However, bacteria are astoundingly diverse (31), with intra- and interspecies variation that is often not well represented by laboratory strains. Moreover, although strains are frequently studied in monoculture in the laboratory, microorganisms usually live in complex and heterogeneous environments where interactions with other microbes profoundly impact their behaviors (reviewed in reference 84). To build on the troves of fundamental knowledge obtained from studies of model organisms, we need to better understand the breadth of related strains and species as well as how they exist within complex microbial communities.
Quorum sensing, a form of bacterial cell-cell signaling, illustrates current challenges and opportunities in efforts to study microbes in communities. The quorum sensing systems of wild bacterial isolates display both sequence-level diversity and altered regulatory networks when compared to those of model laboratory strains (85, 86). Furthermore, it is becoming clear that, in addition to its canonical role in intraspecies communication, quorum sensing can mediate both cooperative and antagonistic interspecies interactions (reviewed in reference 87). A major challenge remains in connecting sequence differences to specific functions, particularly with regard to more detailed molecular function or specificity (beyond broad categorizations into gene or protein families) (reviewed in reference 88). For example, within LuxI/R-type quorum sensing, over 6,000 unique systems were identified by sequencing (89). However, these sequences cannot be used to predict the specific chemical identities of the signals produced by the enzymes encoded by these genes or reveal to which signal(s) a quorum sensing receptor will respond in a mixed community. Although advances in experimental methods facilitate larger-scale experiments to explore these questions, laboratory studies have been limited to exploring only a few dozen systems in detail and roughly 100 systems more shallowly (90, 91). The integration of computational approaches with laboratory experiments enables more rapid and thorough explorations of quorum sensing diversity by helping to link sequences to molecular insights. For instance, covariation analysis (92) was used to identify amino acids responsible for signal selectivity in LuxI/R-type quorum sensing systems (89), advancing efforts to predict signals from sequence and elucidating strain-level genetic diversity that is likely to alter the function of these systems.
The study of microbial communities has yielded important advances in recent years. The combination of metagenomics, isolate libraries, and defined model communities have enabled detailed molecular and chemical studies of bacterial isolates and communities from habitats as diverse as the eastern cottonwood tree (Populus deltoides) (93–95), methane-oxidizing sediment communities (96, 97) (reviewed in reference 98), and the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (85, 99). With the vast quantities of genomic and metagenomic data generated for these communities, computational approaches allow the prioritization of gene sequences for study. In the case of quorum sensing, sequence similarity network analysis (100) could be used to group signal synthase genes into clusters expected to produce the same signal (101). When a molecular signal is known for a high-quality reference sequence, it becomes possible to predict what signal is likely produced by the products of related genes in the cluster. The value of this approach is exemplified by a study of LuxI-type signal synthases from methylotrophic bacteria, in which most gene clusters had no reference signal (102). Experimental determination of the signal for the largest gene cluster resulted in the identification of a novel signaling molecule widespread among methylotrophs (102). High-quality reference databases would rapidly improve the utility of such approaches (103), especially as studies expand to metagenomes and large-scale surveys of bacterial communities. In the example of quorum sensing, these studies can result in a catalog of signaling potential for a genus or community and suggest general modes of community interaction.
In recent years, more and more public computational resources have become available, including genomic and metagenomic databases with comprehensive integrated bioinformatics platforms such as Integrated Microbial Genomes & Microbiomes (IMG/M) (104), the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Center (BV-BRC) (105), and the Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase) (106). In addition, web resources for generating sequence similarity networks (100) are publicly available and user-friendly, providing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that allow scientists to submit sequences for analysis without significant computational knowledge. In many cases, the accessibility of these platforms is increased by tutorials and webinars. Looking ahead, greater collaboration between computational biologists and experimental microbiologists will enable increasingly sophisticated and accessible applications of advanced bioinformatic and computational methods. In addition, higher throughput and automated experimental methods, expanding from hundreds to thousands of sequences, strains, or organisms, will enable scientists to rapidly expand insights into the diversity of bacterial metabolism, signaling, and interactions. Developments in establishing reproducible model microbial communities that reflect native-like complexity and avoid the inadvertent domestication of strains will facilitate more mechanistic studies of the complex, heterogeneous, and multifaceted interactions in bacterial communities (107). Finally, advances in single-cell transcriptomics and imaging, as discussed next, will reveal the spatial structure and interactions that take place in natural microbial communities.
DEVELOPMENTS IN STUDIES OF SINGLE CELLS
Even within a single population of microbes of the same species, there is commonly substantial phenotypic variation. A subset of cells may adopt non-growing, stress-tolerant “persister” phenotypes (reviewed in references 108, 109), or cells may diversify into multiple metabolic states (reviewed in references 110, 111). Intrinsic gene expression noise arising from stochastic events further adds to this diversity (112, 113) (reviewed in reference 114). Traditional approaches to capture information about transcripts, proteins, or even small molecules in cells require bulk extraction from millions of cells and, as such, are blind to this variation at the single-cell level. However, the ability to learn about individual cells is changing with advances in single-cell transcriptomics and microscopy.
Advancing single-cell transcriptomics
The sequencing of RNA from individual cells is more and more commonplace for multicellular organisms. However, various technical considerations, chiefly microbes’ tough cell walls, low RNA content, and lack of mRNA polyadenylation (in the case of eubacteria), have been barriers to the adoption of this technology in the microbiology field (reviewed in references 115, 116). This is rapidly changing with the development of several new techniques for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in both bacteria (117–124) and fungi (125–128). These include methods based on nanoliter droplet barcoding (in which cells are separated into individual droplets and the RNA in each droplet is associated with a different barcode [118, 120, 121, 123, 125, 127, 128]), combinatorial indexing (in which the RNA in each cell is marked by a unique combination of barcodes added during multiple iterations of splitting pools of cells [117–120, 124, 126]), and even spatially resolved, microscopy-based approaches (129, 130). Although the field is still in its infancy, applications already range from understanding the fundamental transcriptional biology of microbes (131, 132) and their mobile genetic elements (such as transposable elements [120], plasmids [133], and bacteriophages [117, 118]), to heterogeneous responses of microbes to antimicrobials and other stresses (118, 120, 123, 125), and diversification within biofilms (119, 129) and within the mammalian host (130). The breadth of these initial efforts indicates that scRNA-seq will be impactful in numerous fields of both basic microbiology and infectious disease going forward.
Making the most of these advances will require the synthesis of microbiological understanding and experimental techniques with computational approaches to handle these large, noisy, and sparse data sets. It can be problematic to adapt existing mammalian frameworks for the analysis of scRNA-seq data to microbes, especially bacteria, given the unique features of these organisms. Bacterial mRNAs are unspliced, polycistronic, and highly unstable compared to eukaryotic transcripts (reviewed in references 116, 134). Physiological events, such as DNA replication and cell cycle progression, also influence transcriptional dynamics in a way that is distinct from eukaryotic cells (131, 135). For this field to progress, individuals conversant across both microbiology and computational analysis are needed. scRNA-seq experiments will also benefit from individuals with diverse experimental backgrounds. These include those who can apply scRNA-seq techniques to more challenging samples such as biofilms or the gut microbiome, or have expertise in quantitative systems biology where much progress has been made in understanding transcriptional noise (reviewed in references 114, 136, 137). Exposing microbiologists early in their training to computational and quantitative sciences would support these efforts in applying scRNA-seq technologies to microbes. Finally, forums to bring researchers with expertise across these diverse areas would accelerate the development of a new single-cell genomics field with tools and applications unique to microbiology.
Advancing single-cell microscopy
An ever-expanding pursuit in the field of microbiology is the investigation of the physiology of single cells and single molecules using microscopic imaging. These approaches enable researchers to explore previously intractable problems, such as how biomolecules function inside living cells (reviewed in reference 138), how microbial communities generate transcriptional heterogeneity in space and time (129, 139, 140), and how the mechanical properties of biofilm communities emerge from cell-cell interactions (141) (reviewed in reference 142). Ongoing advances in imaging-based approaches are making these pursuits commonplace. Many more researchers now have access to confocal microscopes, enabling three-dimensional sectioning of microbial cells and communities. Moreover, the continuous development of cutting-edge imaging techniques, such as super-resolution microscopy and light-sheet microscopy approaches, enables studies at unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution (143) (reviewed in reference 144). New probing techniques allow researchers to examine the entire transcriptomes of individual cells with single-molecule sensitivity in fixed, in-situ communities (129). Furthermore, live-cell reporters for numerous biological processes, such as starvation, c-di-GMP production, and quorum sensing, are becoming increasingly reliable (145–147). Finally, in the age of AI, image analysis software is more effective at improving image quality post-acquisition, and freely available image analysis programs help users extract information from their data sets (148–151). The field of microbiology is now positioned to explore the molecular processes that underpin complex behaviors in unprecedented detail.
What, then, is needed for the future of imaging studies of microbial physiology? Several areas could benefit from technological and experimental developments. One ongoing goal is to examine real-time gene expression in living microbial cells and their communities. Although in situ-based approaches are revolutionizing our ability to investigate transcriptomes with high spatial resolution, current techniques require fixation and, therefore, cannot address the temporal development of transcriptional states in real time. The counterpart to this approach is to examine the activity of one gene at a time, commonly leveraging fluorescent protein-based promoter fusions. This approach is laborious as it involves optimization for each promoter of interest, is indirect, and is subject to the kinetics of fluorescent proteins. Future tools that enable real-time imaging of RNAs in live cells on a transcriptome-wide basis could transform how we study gene expression in microbes.
Another area that is ripe for continued development is live-cell imaging approaches that enable investigators to observe microbes in the communities and hosts in which they live (reviewed in reference 152). Although we know much about the physiology of individual bacteria grown in simple conditions, approaches that expand our ability to examine bacteria in their natural contexts, allowing us to account for intra-species interactions and variability in complex mixtures, will tremendously expand our understanding of bacteria in their native environments. There also is the need to develop additional sensors that faithfully report on the distribution and concentration of diverse cellular molecules. Finally, microbial imaging will benefit from continuous improvements to automation and AI. These techniques would allow us to massively scale up both data acquisition and analysis, creating new possibilities in the process. For instance, imaging entire mutant libraries at the single-cell and population levels could allow us to understand the phenotypic landscapes of model bacteria and the relationship to genomic architecture and physiology (61, 72, 75). Imaging arrayed environmental samples in monoculture and co-culture could allow us to understand how bacteria self-organize and interact in specific environments. Together, the imaging advances described here will complement novel genomic and culturing methods to enable a holistic understanding of microbial physiology, behavior, and ecology in model and natural systems.
DEVELOPMENTS IN DETERMINING THE STRUCTURES OF MICROBIAL MACROMOLECULES AND MACROMOLECULAR COMPLEXES
Finally, thousands of critical insights into molecular biology and physiology have come from the determination of macromolecular structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray crystallography, and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with continuous advances in technology. Developments in cryo-EM hardware (electron sources, energy filters, and electron detectors) are enabling truly atomic structure determination (153). Recent advances in structure prediction through AlphaFold (29) and RoseTTAFold (154) also are remarkable. Nevertheless, much remains to be learned about the structures of macromolecules and macromolecular complexes to increase our molecular and mechanistic understanding of microbial processes.
Determining and predicting the structures of several types of macromolecules, including multi-component, nucleic acid-bound assemblies, and large integral membrane complexes, continue to be challenging. The predictions of these complexes are limited, in part, because the corpus of these structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), given the barriers to solving the structures, is not as comprehensive as that of protein-only folds. For example, processes such as transcription, DNA repair, and transposition rely on the coordinated assembly of large macromolecular complexes at specific DNA locations. An emerging theme from these studies is the role of DNA distortions in priming complex assemblies. The integration of the bacterial RNA-guided transposon V-K CAST (CRISPR-associated transposon) requires a large megadalton complex of transposon-encoded proteins assembled on a specific DNA distortion, created by the RNA-guided CRISPR-like effector, to recruit the transposase to the target site (155). Target DNA distortions are also observed in other integration complex assemblies (156, 157) although the specific structure of the distortion varies. These super-complexes can be very difficult to reconstitute. DNA-binding proteins can be labile and hard to express in large quantities, and the quantity becomes increasingly limiting with each additional component. Finally, since cryo-EM relies on averaging a large number of particle images to increase the signal in inherently noisy images, high sample concentrations are needed to obtain a sufficient number of images (reviewed in reference 158). If samples are heterogeneous, then orders of magnitude more data may be required.
To circumvent yield issues, EM grids can be prepared using a thin layer of graphene, which provides an atomically thin, essentially transparent carbon surface to which complexes often adhere better compared to the air-water interface, thus reducing sample concentration requirements by an order of magnitude (159, 160). In another approach, functionalized affinity grids specifically enrich for the molecule of interest (161), also reducing sample concentration requirements. Further improvements come from engineering components of the complexes. For instance, the design of a suitable DNA substrate facilitates complex formation by bypassing slow, rate-limiting assembly kinetics (162, 163). Increases in yield, which can lead to the solution of multiple states, additionally will help address the issue that many structures only represent one static form of a complex that cycles through unexpected conformations not represented by known or predicted structures. Increases in data collection speed and throughput will also help resolve multiple states within a conformationally heterogeneous data set, further adding structural and mechanistic insights.
Excitingly, cryo-EM validation practices are continuously evolving. However, it is important to note that critical metrics such as resolution estimates can be biased by choices during image processing (reviewed in reference 164). As the use of cryo-EM becomes increasingly widespread, automated, and broadly adopted, it remains critical that the resulting maps are carefully inspected and subjected to rigorous validation.
Finally, regardless of how they were solved, structures may differ from those found in cells given that the biochemical preparations may not represent the conditions in a cell or be missing a component. This problem is especially acute if the complexes are purified from heterologous organisms, the processes being studied are incompletely characterized, or additional cellular factors are required for complex assembly and stabilization. For example, S15, an abundant bacterial protein that normally functions in the ribosome, is repurposed by the V-K CAST system from Scytonema hoffmmanni (ShCAST) to stabilize its integration complex (165). S15 is not absolutely required for in vitro activity of ShCAST (166) and was initially thought to be a contaminant (165). However, S15 stimulates ShCAST activity by an order of magnitude (155, 165). Therefore, the development of robust methods to systematically identify required factors would be beneficial for studies of assemblies. Conducting genome-wide screens, as described above, is one avenue for identifying missing factors (167), whereas host factors known for applicable activities, such as the bacterial integration host factor (IHF) known to induce DNA distortions, can also be implicated by studying sequence preferences (168). More recently, macromolecular assemblies have been visualized by directly imaging cellular extracts (169, 170), and one can envision a hybrid approach that enriches for desired target assemblies in cell-free extracts as well as cellular lysates. Ever-increasing developments in structure determination and prediction, cross-fertilized by the multi-omic, genetic, single cell, and computational advances discussed in earlier sections, hopefully will ultimately lead to structural and mechanistic understanding of nearly all microbial macromolecules and macromolecular complexes.
OVERARCHING CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Several interconnected themes reoccur in the approaches and methodologies described above. These include the need to improve effective sharing of protocols, computational pipelines and programs, resources, and data sets. Addressing this need will require international discussions on how these sharing platforms are best developed and sustainably maintained. For the most effective sharing, improvements to data standardization and updates (for instance, of gene sequence annotations) also need to be continuous. Increased accessibility to cutting-edge approaches and up-to-date data sets will benefit scientists worldwide. Simultaneously, there are opportunities to continue to improve technology at all levels, from increasing the ability to monitor more molecules at diverse spatial scales, as well as the activities of individual cells, to determining the atomic-scale structures of macromolecules, all in conjunction with improving our ability to culture and genetically manipulate a broader range of organisms and to compare data sets across these systems. Attainment of these goals will be facilitated by advances in automation and the application of advanced computing and AI. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, scientists at all levels need to be trained to have expertise across disciplines to be able to take advantage of and critically evaluate the diverse array of exponentially expanding data sets. With all these new technologies and approaches in the hands of the next generation of scientists, the future of microbial molecular biology and physiology is tremendously exciting and will undoubtedly lead to the discovery of completely unexpected microbial mechanisms and solutions for improving health and the environment worldwide.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by NIH grant R00AI158939, a Shurl and Kay Curci Foundation grant, and Kaufman Foundation New Investigator Research Grant KA2023-136488 to A.A.B.; NIH grant R01GM144566, Pew Biomedical Foundation, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pioneer Awards to E.H.K.; NIH grant K99GM145768 to S.W.M.; NIH grant K22AI177517-01 to A.P.; NIH grant RM1GM135102 to A.L.S., NIH grant DP2AI184732 to A.V.; NIH grant R21AI176067-01 to H.B.K.; NIH grant R35GM145261 to E.A.S.; and the Intramural Research program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to G.S.
Additional members of the Molecular Biology and Physiology Community of the Council on Microbial Sciences Retreat Organizing Committee are Jeffrey Boyd (Rutgers University), Peggy Cotter (University of North Carolina), and Prahathees Eswara (University of South Florida).
Contributor Information
Gisela Storz, Email: storzg@mail.nih.gov.
Jacob Yount, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Molecular Biology and Physiology Community of the Council on Microbial Sciences:
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00694-25.
Table of useful websites.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Fraser CM, Gocayne JD, White O, Adams MD, Clayton RA, Fleischmann RD, Bult CJ, Kerlavage AR, Sutton G, Kelley JM, et al. 1995. The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270:397–403. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM. 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512. doi: 10.1126/science.7542800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hunt M, Lima L, Anderson D, Hawkey J, Shen W, Lees J, Iqbal Z. 2024. AllTheBacteria - all bacterial genomes assembled, available and searchable. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.08.584059 [DOI]
- 4. Cabral DJ, Wurster JI, Korry BJ, Penumutchu S, Belenky P. 2020. Consumption of a Western-style diet modulates the response of the murine gut microbiome to ciprofloxacin. mSystems 5:e00317-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00317-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Reasoner SA, Bernard R, Waalkes A, Penewit K, Lewis J, Sokolow AG, Brown RF, Edwards KM, Salipante SJ, Hadjifrangiskou M, Nicholson MR. 2024. Longitudinal profiling of the intestinal microbiome in children with cystic fibrosis treated with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. mBio 15:e01935-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01935-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Raghuvanshi R, Vasco K, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Jiang L, Morton JT, Li D, Gonzalez A, DeRight Goldasich L, Humphrey G, Ackermann G, Swafford AD, Conrad D, Knight R, Dorrestein PC, Quinn RA. 2020. High-resolution longitudinal dynamics of the cystic fibrosis sputum microbiome and metabolome through antibiotic therapy. mSystems 5:e00292-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00292-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Arehart CH, Sterrett JD, Garris RL, Quispe-Pilco RE, Gignoux CR, Evans LM, Stanislawski MA. 2024. Poly-omic risk scores predict inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. mSystems 9:e00677-23. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00677-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mills RH, Dulai PS, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Sauceda C, Daniel N, Gerner RR, Batachari LE, Malfavon M, Zhu Q, Weldon K, Humphrey G, Carrillo-Terrazas M, Goldasich LD, Bryant M, Raffatellu M, Quinn RA, Gewirtz AT, Chassaing B, Chu H, Sandborn WJ, Dorrestein PC, Knight R, Gonzalez DJ. 2022. Multi-omics analyses of the ulcerative colitis gut microbiome link Bacteroides vulgatus proteases with disease severity. Nat Microbiol 7:262–276. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01050-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Mandal RK, Mandal A, Denny JE, Namazii R, John CC, Schmidt NW. 2023. Gut Bacteroides act in a microbial consortium to cause susceptibility to severe malaria. Nat Commun 14:6465. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42235-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Graw S, Chappell K, Washam CL, Gies A, Bird J, Robeson MS, Byrum SD. 2021. Multi-omics data integration considerations and study design for biological systems and disease. Mol Omics 17:170–185. doi: 10.1039/d0mo00041h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Krassowski M, Das V, Sahu SK, Misra BB. 2020. State of the field in multi-omics research: from computational needs to data mining and sharing. Front Genet 11:610798. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.610798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. van Iterson M, ’t Hoen PAC, Pedotti P, Hooiveld GJEJ, den Dunnen JT, van Ommen GJB, Boer JM, Menezes RX. 2009. Relative power and sample size analysis on gene expression profiling data. BMC Genomics 10:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Knight R, Vrbanac A, Taylor BC, Aksenov A, Callewaert C, Debelius J, Gonzalez A, Kosciolek T, McCall L-I, McDonald D, Melnik AV, Morton JT, Navas J, Quinn RA, Sanders JG, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Tripathi A, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhu Q, Caporaso JG, Dorrestein PC. 2018. Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:410–422. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Barnes S. 2020. Overview of experimental methods and study design in metabolomics, and statistical and pathway considerations. Methods Mol Biol 2104:1–10. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0239-3_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sankaran K, Holmes SP. 2019. Multitable methods for microbiome data integration. Front Genet 10:627. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Grazioli F, Siarheyeu R, Alqassem I, Henschel A, Pileggi G, Meiser A. 2022. Microbiome-based disease prediction with multimodal variational information bottlenecks. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1010050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cabral L, Persinoti GF, Paixão DAA, Martins MP, Morais MAB, Chinaglia M, Domingues MN, Sforca ML, Pirolla RAS, Generoso WC, Santos CA, Maciel LF, Terrapon N, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Murakami MT. 2022. Gut microbiome of the largest living rodent harbors unprecedented enzymatic systems to degrade plant polysaccharides. Nat Commun 13:629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28310-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Schirmer M, Stražar M, Avila-Pacheco J, Rojas-Tapias DF, Brown EM, Temple E, Deik A, Bullock K, Jeanfavre S, Pierce K, Jin S, Invernizzi R, Pust MM, Costliow Z, Mack DR, Griffiths AM, Walters T, Boyle BM, Kugathasan S, Vlamakis H, Hyams J, Denson L, Clish CB, Xavier RJ. 2024. Linking microbial genes to plasma and stool metabolites uncovers host-microbial interactions underlying ulcerative colitis disease course. Cell Host Microbe 32:209–226. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Muller E, Shiryan I, Borenstein E. 2024. Multi-omic integration of microbiome data for identifying disease-associated modules. Nat Commun 15:2621. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46888-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Min Y, Ma X, Sankaran K, Ru Y, Chen L, Baiocchi M, Zhu S. 2019. Sex-specific association between gut microbiome and fat distribution. Nat Commun 10:2408. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10440-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chang WK, VanInsberghe D, Kelly L. 2020. Topological analysis reveals state transitions in human gut and marine bacterial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6:41. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00145-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Luo M, Zhu J, Jia J, Zhang H, Zhao J. 2024. Progress on network modeling and analysis of gut microecology: a review. Appl Environ Microbiol 90:e00092-24. doi: 10.1128/aem.00092-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lac L, Leung CK, Hu P. 2024. Computational frameworks integrating deep learning and statistical models in mining multimodal omics data. J Biomed Inform 152:104629. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guthrie L, Spencer SP, Perelman D, Van Treuren W, Han S, Yu FB, Sonnenburg ED, Fischbach MA, Meyer TW, Sonnenburg JL. 2022. Impact of a 7-day homogeneous diet on interpersonal variation in human gut microbiomes and metabolomes. Cell Host Microbe 30:863–874. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Han S, Van Treuren W, Fischer CR, Merrill BD, DeFelice BC, Sanchez JM, Higginbottom SK, Guthrie L, Fall LA, Dodd D, Fischbach MA, Sonnenburg JL. 2021. A metabolomics pipeline for the mechanistic interrogation of the gut microbiome. Nature 595:415–420. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03707-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Liu Y, Hou Y, Wang G, Zheng X, Hao H. 2020. Gut microbial metabolites of aromatic amino acids as signals in host-microbe interplay. Trends Endocrinol Metab 31:818–834. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pearson WR. 2013. An introduction to sequence similarity ("homology") searching. Curr Protoc Bioinform 42:3. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0301s42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Overbeek R, Fonstein M, D’Souza M, Pusch GD, Maltsev N. 1999. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2896–2901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Falkow S. 1988. Molecular Koch’s postulates applied to microbial pathogenicity. Rev Infect Dis 10:S274–S276. doi: 10.1093/cid/10.supplement_2.s274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Butterfield CN, Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Dudek N, Relman DA, Finstad KM, Amundson R, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2016. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 1:16048. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Brödel AK, Charpenay LH, Galtier M, Fuche FJ, Terrasse R, Poquet C, Havránek J, Pignotti S, Krawczyk A, Arraou M, Prevot G, Spadoni D, Yarnall MTN, Hessel EM, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Duportet X, Bikard D. 2024. In situ targeted base editing of bacteria in the mouse gut. Nature 632:877–884. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07681-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rubin BE, Diamond S, Cress BF, Crits-Christoph A, Lou YC, Borges AL, Shivram H, He C, Xu M, Zhou Z, Smith SJ, Rovinsky R, Smock DCJ, Tang K, Owens TK, Krishnappa N, Sachdeva R, Barrangou R, Deutschbauer AM, Banfield JF, Doudna JA. 2022. Species- and site-specific genome editing in complex bacterial communities. Nat Microbiol 7:34–47. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01014-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lewis WH, Tahon G, Geesink P, Sousa DZ, Ettema TJG. 2021. Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:225–240. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hamilton CM, Aldea M, Washburn BK, Babitzke P, Kushner SR. 1989. New method for generating deletions and gene replacements in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 171:4617–4622. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.9.4617-4622.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Miller VL, Mekalanos JJ. 1988. A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR. J Bacteriol 170:2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2575-2583.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Murphy KC. 1998. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180:2063–2071. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.8.2063-2071.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee EC, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL. 2000. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5978–5983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100127597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31:233–239. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152:1173–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Murphy KC. 1991. Lambda Gam protein inhibits the helicase and chi-stimulated recombination activities of Escherichia coli RecBCD enzyme. J Bacteriol 173:5808–5821. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.18.5808-5821.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Filsinger GT, Wannier TM, Pedersen FB, Lutz ID, Zhang J, Stork DA, Debnath A, Gozzi K, Kuchwara H, Volf V, Wang S, Rios X, Gregg CJ, Lajoie MJ, Shipman SL, Aach J, Laub MT, Church GM. 2021. Characterizing the portability of phage-encoded homologous recombination proteins. Nat Chem Biol 17:394–402. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-00710-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Corts A, Thomason LC, Costantino N, Court DL. 2022. Recombineering in non-model bacteria. Curr Protoc 2:e605. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wannier TM, Nyerges A, Kuchwara HM, Czikkely M, Balogh D, Filsinger GT, Borders NC, Gregg CJ, Lajoie MJ, Rios X, Pál C, Church GM. 2020. Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:13689–13698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001588117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Mutalik VK, Novichkov PS, Price MN, Owens TK, Callaghan M, Carim S, Deutschbauer AM, Arkin AP. 2019. Dual-barcoded shotgun expression library sequencing for high-throughput characterization of functional traits in bacteria. Nat Commun 10:308. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08177-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wetmore KM, Price MN, Waters RJ, Lamson JS, He J, Hoover CA, Blow MJ, Bristow J, Butland G, Arkin AP, Deutschbauer A. 2015. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. mBio 6:e00306-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00306-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Enright AL, Heelan WJ, Ward RD, Peters JM. 2024. CRISPRi functional genomics in bacteria and its application to medical and industrial research. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 88:e00170-22. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00170-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Brochado AR, Typas A. 2013. High-throughput approaches to understanding gene function and mapping network architecture in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Huang YY, Price MN, Hung A, Gal-Oz O, Tripathi S, Smith CW, Ho D, Carion H, Deutschbauer AM, Arkin AP. 2024. Barcoded overexpression screens in gut Bacteroidales identify genes with roles in carbon utilization and stress resistance. Nat Commun 15:6618. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50124-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Tripathi S, Voogdt CGP, Bassler SO, Anderson M, Huang P-H, Sakenova N, Capraz T, Jain S, Koumoutsi A, Bravo AM, Trotter V, Zimmerman M, Sonnenburg JL, Buie C, Typas A, Deutschbauer AM, Shiver AL, Huang KC. 2024. Randomly barcoded transposon mutant libraries for gut commensals I: strategies for efficient library construction. Cell Rep 43:113517. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Voogdt CGP, Tripathi S, Bassler SO, McKeithen-Mead SA, Guiberson ER, Koumoutsi A, Bravo AM, Buie C, Zimmermann M, Sonnenburg JL, Typas A, Deutschbauer AM, Shiver AL, Huang KC. 2024. Randomly barcoded transposon mutant libraries for gut commensals II: applying libraries for functional genetics. Cell Rep 43:113519. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Price MN, Wetmore KM, Waters RJ, Callaghan M, Ray J, Liu H, Kuehl JV, Melnyk RA, Lamson JS, Suh Y, Carlson HK, Esquivel Z, Sadeeshkumar H, Chakraborty R, Zane GM, Rubin BE, Wall JD, Visel A, Bristow J, Blow MJ, Arkin AP, Deutschbauer AM. 2018. Mutant phenotypes for thousands of bacterial genes of unknown function. Nature 557:503–509. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0124-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. de Bakker V, Liu X, Bravo AM, Veening J-W. 2022. CRISPRi-seq for genome-wide fitness quantification in bacteria. Nat Protoc 17:252–281. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00639-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hawkins JS, Silvis MR, Koo B-M, Peters JM, Osadnik H, Jost M, Hearne CC, Weissman JS, Todor H, Gross CA. 2020. Mismatch-CRISPRi reveals the co-varying expression-fitness relationships of essential genes in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst 11:523–535. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Peters JM, Colavin A, Shi H, Czarny TL, Larson MH, Wong S, Hawkins JS, Lu CHS, Koo BM, Marta E, Shiver AL, Whitehead EH, Weissman JS, Brown ED, Qi LS, Huang KC, Gross CA. 2016. A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria. Cell 165:1493–1506. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Erlich Y, Chang K, Gordon A, Ronen R, Navon O, Rooks M, Hannon GJ. 2009. DNA Sudoku—harnessing high-throughput sequencing for multiplexed specimen analysis. Genome Res 19:1243–1253. doi: 10.1101/gr.092957.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Goodman AL, McNulty NP, Zhao Y, Leip D, Mitra RD, Lozupone CA, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2009. Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe 6:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Held K, Ramage E, Jacobs M, Gallagher L, Manoil C. 2012. Sequence-verified two-allele transposon mutant library for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 194:6387–6389. doi: 10.1128/JB.01479-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Baym M, Shaket L, Anzai IA, Adesina O, Barstow B. 2016. Rapid construction of a whole-genome transposon insertion collection for Shewanella oneidensis by Knockout Sudoku. Nat Commun 7:13270. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Arjes HA, Sun J, Liu H, Nguyen TH, Culver RN, Celis AI, Walton SJ, Vasquez KS, Yu FB, Xue KS, Newton D, Zermeno R, Weglarz M, Deutschbauer A, Huang KC, Shiver AL. 2022. Construction and characterization of a genome-scale ordered mutant collection of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. BMC Biol 20:285. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01481-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Beltrao P, Cagney G, Krogan NJ. 2010. Quantitative genetic interactions reveal biological modularity. Cell 141:739–745. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Typas A, Nichols RJ, Siegele DA, Shales M, Collins SR, Lim B, Braberg H, Yamamoto N, Takeuchi R, Wanner BL, Mori H, Weissman JS, Krogan NJ, Gross CA. 2008. High-throughput, quantitative analyses of genetic interactions in E. coli. Nat Methods 5:781–787. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Paradis-Bleau C, Kritikos G, Orlova K, Typas A, Bernhardt TG. 2014. A genome-wide screen for bacterial envelope biogenesis mutants identifies a novel factor involved in cell wall precursor metabolism. PLoS Genet 10:e1004056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Koo BM, Kritikos G, Farelli JD, Todor H, Tong K, Kimsey H, Wapinski I, Galardini M, Cabal A, Peters JM, Hachmann AB, Rudner DZ, Allen KN, Typas A, Gross CA. 2017. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst 4:291–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bogomolnaya LM, Aldrich L, Ragoza Y, Talamantes M, Andrews KD, McClelland M, Andrews-Polymenis HL. 2014. Identification of novel factors involved in modulating motility of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. PLoS One 9:e111513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ursell T, Lee TK, Shiomi D, Shi H, Tropini C, Monds RD, Colavin A, Billings G, Bhaya-Grossman I, Broxton M, Huang BE, Niki H, Huang KC. 2017. Rapid, precise quantification of bacterial cellular dimensions across a genomic-scale knockout library. BMC Biol 15:17. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0348-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Zahir T, Camacho R, Vitale R, Ruckebusch C, Hofkens J, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2019. High-throughput time-resolved morphology screening in bacteria reveals phenotypic responses to antibiotics. Commun Biol 2:269. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0480-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. 2006. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Véronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, André B, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387–391. doi: 10.1038/nature00935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Giaever G, Nislow C. 2014. The yeast deletion collection: a decade of functional genomics. Genetics 197:451–465. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.161620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Shiver A.L, Culver R, Deutschbauer AM, Huang KC. 2021. Rapid ordering of barcoded transposon insertion libraries of anaerobic bacteria. Nat Protoc 16:3049–3071. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00531-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Anzai IA, Shaket L, Adesina O, Baym M, Barstow B. 2017. Rapid curation of gene disruption collections using Knockout Sudoku. Nat Protoc 12:2110–2137. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. 2019. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature 570:462–467. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1291-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Shiver AL, Sun J, Culver R, Violette A, Wynter C, Nieckarz M, Mattiello SP, Sekhon PK, Bottacini F, Friess L, et al. 2025. Genome-scale resources in the infant gut symbiont Bifidobacterium breve reveal genetic determinants of colonization and host-microbe interactions. Cell 188:2003–2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Engelhart MJ, Glowacki RWP, Till JM, Harding CV, Martens EC, Ahern PP. 2023. The NQR complex regulates the immunomodulatory function of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. J Immunol 211:767–781. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Baker SE, Mans D. 2021. EMSL science drivers and scope workshop for: microbial molecular phenotyping capability (M2PC). Richland, Washington: Energy USDo, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://www.emsl.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/M2PCScienceDriversWorkshop_FINAL.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zeigler DR, Prágai Z, Rodriguez S, Chevreux B, Muffler A, Albert T, Bai R, Wyss M, Perkins JB. 2008. The origins of 168, W23, and other Bacillus subtilis legacy strains. J Bacteriol 190:6983–6995. doi: 10.1128/JB.00722-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. McLoon AL, Guttenplan SB, Kearns DB, Kolter R, Losick R. 2011. Tracing the domestication of a biofilm-forming bacterium. J Bacteriol 193:2027–2034. doi: 10.1128/JB.01542-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Ardalani O, Phaneuf PV, Mohite OS, Nielsen LK, Palsson BO. 2024. Pangenome reconstruction of Lactobacillaceae metabolism predicts species-specific metabolic traits. mSystems 9:e00156-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00156-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sun B, Pashkova L, Pieters PA, Harke AS, Mohite OS, Santos A, Zielinski DC, Palsson BO, Phaneuf PV. 2025. PanKB: an interactive microbial pangenome knowledgebase for research, biotechnological innovation, and knowledge mining. Nucleic Acids Res 53:D806–D818. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Veseli I, DeMers MA, Cooper ZS, Schechter MS, Miller S, Weber L, Smith CB, Rodriguez LT, Schroer WF, McIlvin MR, Lopez PZ, Saito M, Dyhrman S, Eren AM, Moran MA, Braakman R. 2024. Digital Microbe: a genome-informed data integration framework for team science on emerging model organisms. Sci Data 11:967. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03778-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Ruiz N, Silhavy TJ. 2022. How Escherichia coli became the flagship bacterium of molecular biology. J Bacteriol 204:e00230-22. doi: 10.1128/jb.00230-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Weiland-Bräuer N. 2021. Friends or foes-microbial interactions in nature. Biology (Basel) 10:496. doi: 10.3390/biology10060496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Feltner JB, Wolter DJ, Pope CE, Groleau MC, Smalley NE, Greenberg EP, Mayer-Hamblett N, Burns J, Déziel E, Hoffman LR, Dandekar AA. 2016. LasR variant cystic fibrosis isolates reveal an adaptable quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 7:e01513-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01513-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. O’Connor K, Zhao CY, Mei M, Diggle SP. 2022. Frequency of quorum-sensing mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from different environments. Microbiology (Reading) 168:001265. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Abisado RG, Benomar S, Klaus JR, Dandekar AA, Chandler JR. 2018. Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions. mBio 9:e02331-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02331-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kennedy EN, Foster CA, Barr SA, Bourret RB. 2022. General strategies for using amino acid sequence data to guide biochemical investigation of protein function. Biochem Soc Trans 50:1847–1858. doi: 10.1042/BST20220849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Wellington Miranda S, Cong Q, Schaefer AL, MacLeod EK, Zimenko A, Baker D, Greenberg EP. 2021. A covariation analysis reveals elements of selectivity in quorum sensing systems. Elife 10:e69169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Wellington S, Greenberg EP. 2019. Quorum sensing signal selectivity and the potential for interspecies cross talk. mBio 10:e00146-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00146-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Schaefer AL, Harwood CS, Greenberg EP. 2018. "Hot stuff": the many uses of a radiolabel assay in detecting acyl-homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signals. Methods Mol Biol 1673:35–47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7309-5_3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D. 2014. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. Elife 3:e02030. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Schaefer AL, Lappala CR, Morlen RP, Pelletier DA, Lu T-Y, Lankford PK, Harwood CS, Greenberg EP. 2013. LuxR- and LuxI-type quorum-sensing circuits are prevalent in members of the Populus deltoides microbiome. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5745–5752. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01417-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Garcia BJ, Simha R, Garvin M, Furches A, Jones P, Gazolla J, Hyatt PD, Schadt CW, Pelletier D, Jacobson D. 2021. A k-mer based approach for classifying viruses without taxonomy identifies viral associations in human autism and plant microbiomes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19:5911–5919. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Carper DL, Weston DJ, Barde A, Timm CM, Lu TY, Burdick LH, Jawdy SS, Klingeman DM, MSn R, Veach AM, Cregger MA, Kalluri UC, Schadt CW, Podar M, Doktycz MJ, Pelletier DA. 2021. Cultivating the bacterial microbiota of Populus roots. mSystems 6:e01306-20. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01306-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Puri AW, Liu D, Schaefer AL, Yu Z, Pesesky MW, Greenberg EP, Lidstrom ME. 2019. Interspecies chemical signaling in a methane-oxidizing bacterial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02702-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02702-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Beals DG, Puri AW. 2024. Linking methanotroph phenotypes to genotypes using a simple spatially resolved model ecosystem. ISME J 18:wrae060. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Chistoserdova L. 2011. Methylotrophy in a lake: from metagenomics to single-organism physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4705–4711. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00314-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Jean-Pierre F, Hampton TH, Schultz D, Hogan DA, Groleau M-C, Déziel E, O’Toole GA. 2023. Community composition shapes microbial-specific phenotypes in a cystic fibrosis polymicrobial model system. Elife 12:e81604. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Zallot R, Oberg N, Gerlt JA. 2019. The EFI web resource for genomic enzymology tools: leveraging protein, genome, and metagenome databases to discover novel enzymes and metabolic pathways. Biochemistry 58:4169–4182. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Dong S-H, Frane ND, Christensen QH, Greenberg EP, Nagarajan R, Nair SK. 2017. Molecular basis for the substrate specificity of quorum signal synthases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9092–9097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705400114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Wallace M, Cummings DA Jr, Roberts AG, Puri AW. 2024. A widespread methylotroph acyl-homoserine lactone synthase produces a new quorum sensing signal that regulates swarming in Methylobacterium fujisawaense. mBio 15:e01999-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01999-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Schaefer AL, Murdock EG, Pelletier DA, Harwood CS, Greenberg EP, Puri AW. 2025. RefAHL: a curated quorum sensing reference linking diverse LuxI-type signal synthases with their acyl-homoserine lactone products. Microbiol Resour Announc 14:e00407-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00407-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Varghese N, White JR, Seshadri R, Smirnova T, Kirton E, Jungbluth SP, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2019. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D666–D677. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, et al. 2018. KBase: the United States Department of Energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Zengler K, Hofmockel K, Baliga NS, Behie SW, Bernstein HC, Brown JB, Dinneny JR, Floge SA, Forry SP, Hess M, Jackson SA, Jansson C, Lindemann SR, Pett-Ridge J, Maranas C, Venturelli OS, Wallenstein MD, Shank EA, Northen TR. 2019. EcoFABs: advancing microbiome science through standardized fabricated ecosystems. Nat Methods 16:567–571. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0465-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Fisher RA, Gollan B, Helaine S. 2017. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:453–464. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Cotten KL, Davis KM. 2023. Bacterial heterogeneity and antibiotic persistence: bacterial mechanisms utilized in the host environment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 87:e00174-22. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00174-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Moormeier DE, Bayles KW. 2017. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism. Mol Microbiol 104:365–376. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Jo J, Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LEP. 2022. Gradients and consequences of heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:593–607. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00692-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183–1186. doi: 10.1126/science.1070919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Golding I, Paulsson J, Zawilski SM, Cox EC. 2005. Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 123:1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Jones D, Elf J. 2018. Bursting onto the scene? Exploring stochastic mRNA production in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 45:124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Imdahl F, Saliba A-E. 2020. Advances and challenges in single-cell RNA-seq of microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 57:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Homberger C, Barquist L, Vogel J. 2022. Ushering in a new era of single-cell transcriptomics in bacteria. Microlife 3:uqac020. doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqac020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Kuchina A, Brettner LM, Paleologu L, Roco CM, Rosenberg AB, Carignano A, Kibler R, Hirano M, DePaolo RW, Seelig G. 2021. Microbial single-cell RNA sequencing by split-pool barcoding. Science 371:eaba5257. doi: 10.1126/science.aba5257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Wang B, Lin AE, Yuan J, Novak KE, Koch MD, Wingreen NS, Adamson B, Gitai Z. 2023. Single-cell massively-parallel multiplexed microbial sequencing (M3-seq) identifies rare bacterial populations and profiles phage infection. Nat Microbiol 8:1846–1862. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01462-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Korshoj LE, Kielian T. 2024. Bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing captures biofilm transcriptional heterogeneity and differential responses to immune pressure. Nat Commun 15:10184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54581-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Ma P, Amemiya HM, He LL, Gandhi SJ, Nicol R, Bhattacharyya RP, Smillie CS, Hung DT. 2023. Bacterial droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq reveals antibiotic-associated heterogeneous cellular states. Cell 186:877–891. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. McNulty R, Sritharan D, Pahng SH, Meisch JP, Liu S, Brennan MA, Saxer G, Hormoz S, Rosenthal AZ. 2023. Probe-based bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing predicts toxin regulation. Nat Microbiol 8:934–945. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01348-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Imdahl F, Vafadarnejad E, Homberger C, Saliba A-E, Vogel J. 2020. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reports growth-condition-specific global transcriptomes of individual bacteria. Nat Microbiol 5:1202–1206. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0774-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Xu ZZ, Wang Y, Sheng K, Rosenthal R, Liu N, Hua X, Zhang T, Chen J, Song M, Lv Y, Zhang S, Huang Y, Wang Z, Cao T, Shen Y, Jiang Y, Yu Y, Chen Y, Guo G, Yin P, Weitz DA, Wang Y. 2023. Droplet-based high-throughput single microbe RNA sequencing by smRandom-seq. Nat Commun 14:5130. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40137-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Blattman SB, Jiang W, Oikonomou P, Tavazoie S. 2020. Prokaryotic single-cell RNA sequencing by in situ combinatorial indexing. Nat Microbiol 5:1192–1201. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0729-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Dumeaux V, Massahi S, Bettauer V, Mottola A, Dukovny A, Khurdia SS, Costa A, Omran RP, Simpson S, Xie JL, Whiteway M, Berman J, Hallett MT. 2023. Candida albicans exhibits heterogeneous and adaptive cytoprotective responses to antifungal compounds. Elife 12:e81406. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Brettner L, Eder R, Schmidlin K, Geiler-Samerotte K. 2024. An ultra high-throughput, massively multiplexable, single-cell RNA-seq platform in yeasts. Yeast 41:242–255. doi: 10.1002/yea.3927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Urbonaite G, Lee JTH, Liu P, Parada GE, Hemberg M, Acar M. 2021. A yeast-optimized single-cell transcriptomics platform elucidates how mycophenolic acid and guanine alter global mRNA levels. Commun Biol 4:822. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02320-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Dohn R, Xie B, Back R, Selewa A, Eckart H, Rao RP, Basu A. 2021. mDrop-Seq: massively parallel single-cell RNA-Seq of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Vaccines (Basel) 10:30. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Dar D, Dar N, Cai L, Newman DK. 2021. Spatial transcriptomics of planktonic and sessile bacterial populations at single-cell resolution. Science 373:eabi4882. doi: 10.1126/science.abi4882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Sarfatis A, Wang Y, Twumasi-Ankrah N, Moffitt JR. 2025. Highly multiplexed spatial transcriptomics in bacteria. Science 387:eadr0932. doi: 10.1126/science.adr0932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Pountain AW, Jiang P, Yao T, Homaee E, Guan Y, McDonald KJC, Podkowik M, Shopsin B, Torres VJ, Golding I, Yanai I. 2024. Transcription-replication interactions reveal bacterial genome regulation. Nature 626:661–669. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06974-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Brettner L, Geiler-Samerotte K. 2024. Single-cell heterogeneity in ribosome content and the consequences for the growth laws. bioRxiv:2024.04.19.590370. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590370 [DOI]
- 133. Cyriaque V, Ibarra-Chávez R, Kuchina A, Seelig G, Nesme J, Madsen JS. 2024. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals plasmid constrains bacterial population heterogeneity and identifies a non-conjugating subpopulation. Nat Commun 15:5853. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49793-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Walls AW, Rosenthal AZ. 2024. Bacterial phenotypic heterogeneity through the lens of single-cell RNA sequencing. Transcription 15:48–62. doi: 10.1080/21541264.2024.2334110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Wang M, Zhang J, Xu H, Golding I. 2019. Measuring transcription at a single gene copy reveals hidden drivers of bacterial individuality. Nat Microbiol 4:2118–2127. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0553-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Sanchez A, Golding I. 2013. Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression. Science 342:1188–1193. doi: 10.1126/science.1242975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Engl C. 2019. Noise in bacterial gene expression. Biochem Soc Trans 47:209–217. doi: 10.1042/BST20180500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Kapanidis AN, Lepore A, El Karoui M. 2018. Rediscovering bacteria through single-molecule imaging in living cells. Biophys J 115:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Dergham Y, Le Coq D, Nicolas P, Bidnenko E, Dérozier S, Deforet M, Huillet E, Sanchez-Vizuete P, Deschamps J, Hamze K, Briandet R. 2023. Direct comparison of spatial transcriptional heterogeneity across diverse Bacillus subtilis biofilm communities. Nat Commun 14:7546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43386-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Evans CR, Smiley MK, Asahara Thio S, Wei M, Florek LC, Dayton H, Price-Whelan A, Min W, Dietrich LEP. 2023. Spatial heterogeneity in biofilm metabolism elicited by local control of phenazine methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e2313208120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313208120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Hartmann R, Singh PK, Pearce P, Mok R, Song B, Díaz-Pascual F, Dunkel J, Drescher K. 2019. Emergence of three-dimensional order and structure in growing biofilms. Nat Phys 15:251–256. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0356-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Moreau A, Mukherjee S, Yan J. 2023. Mechanical characterization and single-cell imaging of bacterial biofilms. Isr J Chem 63:e202200075. doi: 10.1002/ijch.202200075 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Qin B, Fei C, Bridges AA, Mashruwala AA, Stone HA, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. 2020. Cell position fates and collective fountain flow in bacterial biofilms revealed by light-sheet microscopy. Science 369:71–77. doi: 10.1126/science.abb8501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Carsten A, Wolters M, Aepfelbacher M. 2024. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy for investigating bacterial cell biology. Mol Microbiol 121:646–658. doi: 10.1111/mmi.15203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Kaczmarczyk A, van Vliet S, Jakob RP, Teixeira RD, Scheidat I, Reinders A, Klotz A, Maier T, Jenal U. 2024. A genetically encoded biosensor to monitor dynamic changes of c-di-GMP with high temporal resolution. Nat Commun 15:3920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48295-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Zoheir AE, Sobol MS, Meisch L, Ordoñez-Rueda D, Kaster A-K, Niemeyer CM, Rabe KS. 2023. A three-colour stress biosensor reveals multimodal response in single cells and spatiotemporal dynamics of biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 9:57. doi: 10.1038/s41522-023-00424-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Hustmyer CM, Simpson CA, Olney SG, Rusch DB, Bochman ML, van Kessel JC. 2018. Promoter boundaries for the luxCDABE and betIBA-proXWV operons in Vibrio harveyi defined by the method Rapid Arbitrary PCR Insertion Libraries (RAIL). J Bacteriol 200:e00724-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00724-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Hartmann R, Jeckel H, Jelli E, Singh PK, Vaidya S, Bayer M, Rode DKH, Vidakovic L, Díaz-Pascual F, Fong JCN, Dragoš A, Lamprecht O, Thöming JG, Netter N, Häussler S, Nadell CD, Sourjik V, Kovács ÁT, Yildiz FH, Drescher K. 2021. Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with BiofilmQ. Nat Microbiol 6:151–156. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00817-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Paintdakhi A, Parry B, Campos M, Irnov I, Elf J, Surovtsev I, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2016. Oufti: an integrated software package for high-accuracy, high-throughput quantitative microscopy analysis. Mol Microbiol 99:767–777. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Ducret A, Quardokus EM, Brun YV. 2016. MicrobeJ, a tool for high throughput bacterial cell detection and quantitative analysis. Nat Microbiol 1:16077. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Spahn C, Gómez-de-Mariscal E, Laine RF, Pereira PM, von Chamier L, Conduit M, Pinho MG, Jacquemet G, Holden S, Heilemann M, Henriques R. 2022. DeepBacs for multi-task bacterial image analysis using open-source deep learning approaches. Commun Biol 5:688. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03634-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Campisciano G, Biffi S. 2022. Microbiota in vivo imaging approaches to study host-microbe interactions in preclinical and clinical setting. Heliyon 8:e12511. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Nakane T, Kotecha A, Sente A, McMullan G, Masiulis S, Brown PMGE, Grigoras IT, Malinauskaite L, Malinauskas T, Miehling J, Uchański T, Yu L, Karia D, Pechnikova EV, de Jong E, Keizer J, Bischoff M, McCormack J, Tiemeijer P, Hardwick SW, Chirgadze DY, Murshudov G, Aricescu AR, Scheres SHW. 2020. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature 587:152–156. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, Dauparas J, Ovchinnikov S, Lee GR, Wang J, Cong Q, Kinch LN, Schaeffer RD, et al. 2021. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373:871–876. doi: 10.1126/science.abj8754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Park J-U, Tsai A-L, Rizo AN, Truong VH, Wellner TX, Schargel RD, Kellogg EH. 2023. Structures of the holo CRISPR RNA-guided transposon integration complex. Nature 613:775–782. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05573-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Wang S, Siddique R, Hall MC, Rice PA, Chang L. 2024. Structure of TnsABCD transpososome reveals mechanisms of targeted DNA transposition. Cell 187:6865–6881. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. de la Gándara Á, Spínola-Amilibia M, Araújo-Bazán L, Núñez-Ramírez R, Berger JM, Arias-Palomo E. 2024. Molecular basis for transposase activation by a dedicated AAA+ ATPase. Nature 630:1003–1011. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07550-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Cianfrocco MA, Kellogg EH. 2020. What could go wrong? A practical guide to single-particle cryo-EM: from biochemistry to atomic models. J Chem Inf Model 60:2458–2469. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Palovcak E, Wang F, Zheng SQ, Yu Z, Li S, Betegon M, Bulkley D, Agard DA, Cheng Y. 2018. A simple and robust procedure for preparing graphene-oxide cryo-EM grids. J Struct Biol 204:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Ahn E, Kim B, Park S, Erwin AL, Sung SH, Hovden R, Mosalaganti S, Cho U-S. 2023. Batch production of high-quality graphene grids for cryo-EM: cryo-EM structure of Methylococcus capsulatus soluble methane monooxygenase hydroxylase. ACS Nano 17:6011–6022. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c00463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Wang F, Liu Y, Yu Z, Li S, Feng S, Cheng Y, Agard DA. 2020. General and robust covalently linked graphene oxide affinity grids for high-resolution cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:24269–24273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009707117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Park J-U, Tsai AW-L, Chen TH, Peters JE, Kellogg EH. 2022. Mechanistic details of CRISPR-associated transposon recruitment and integration revealed by cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2202590119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202590119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Ghanim GE, Kellogg EH, Nogales E, Rio DC. 2019. Structure of a P element transposase-DNA complex reveals unusual DNA structures and GTP-DNA contacts. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26:1013–1022. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0319-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Lander GC. 2024. Single particle cryo-EM map and model validation: it’s not crystal clear. Curr Opin Struct Biol 89:102918. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Schmitz M, Querques I, Oberli S, Chanez C, Jinek M. 2022. Structural basis for the assembly of the type V CRISPR-associated transposon complex. Cell 185:4999–5010. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Strecker J, Ladha A, Gardner Z, Schmid-Burgk JL, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Zhang F. 2019. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365:48–53. doi: 10.1126/science.aax9181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Song LCT, Alker ATP, Oromí-Bosch A, Swartz SE, Martinson JNV, Arora J, Wang AM, Rovinsky R, Smith SJ, Pierce EC, Deutschbauer AM, Doudna JA, Cress BF, Rubin BE. 2024. Identification of proteins influencing CRISPR-associated transposases for enhanced genome editing. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.11.612086 [DOI]
- 168. Walker MWG, Klompe SE, Zhang DJ, Sternberg SH. 2023. Novel molecular requirements for CRISPR RNA-guided transposition. Nucleic Acids Res 51:4519–4535. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Ho C-M, Li X, Lai M, Terwilliger TC, Beck JR, Wohlschlegel J, Goldberg DE, Fitzpatrick AWP, Zhou ZH. 2020. Bottom-up structural proteomics: cryoEM of protein complexes enriched from the cellular milieu. Nat Methods 17:79–85. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0637-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Vallese F, Kim K, Yen LY, Johnston JD, Noble AJ, Calì T, Clarke OB. 2022. Architecture of the human erythrocyte ankyrin-1 complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 29:706–718. doi: 10.1038/s41594-022-00792-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table of useful websites.
