Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 30;15(15):1916. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151916

Table 3.

Application of liquid biopsy in other samples.

Category of Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers Detection Method No. of
Participants
(EC/Control)
Clinical Significance/Findings/Accuracy Author and Year
Uterine lavage fluid/uterine aspirates
cfDNA, CTCs PTEN, PIK3CA, TP53, CTNNB1, KRAS, etc. NGS, ddPCR, CellSearch system 60 EC Genetic alterations were detected in 93% of EC through UAs. ctDNA was associated with high-risk tumors and disease progression. Casas-Arozamena et al., 2020
[159]
cfDNA BAT26, BAT25, NR24, NR21, Mono27 ddPCR 90 EC A high concordance (96.67%) between MSI determinations in cfDNA and the standard of care was confirmed. Casas-Arozamena et al., 2023
[160]
cfRNA miR-146a-5p, miR-183-5p, miR-429 Real-time PCR 42/40 miR-146a-5p, miR-183-5p, and miR-429 were significantly upregulated in EC.
AUC: miR-183-5p: 0.675, miR-429: 0.709, miR-146a-5p: 0.685
Yang et al., 2023 [161]
Cervicovaginal fluid/cervicovaginal lavage
Metabonomics Phosphocholine, malate, asparagine NMR spectroscopy 21/33 Metabolomic biomarkers in CVF for
non-invasive detection of EC were identified and validated using ML algorithms.
AUC: [training: 0.88–0.92; test: 0.75–0.80]; sensitivity (95% CI): forests: 0.75 (0.19–0.99); specificity (95% CI): forests: 0.80 (0.28–1.00)
Cheng et al., 2019 [162]
Cytology Malignant endometrial cells Cytological analysis 103/113 Vaginal cytology demonstrated higher sensitivity (90.2%) compared to urine cytology (72.0%) but lower specificity.
Sensitivity: [vaginal: 90.2%, urine: 72.0%, combined: 91.7%]; specificity: [vaginal: 88.7%, urine: 94.9%, combined: 88.8%]
O’Flynn et al., 2021 [163]
Proteomics 72 proteins (TIM-3, VEGF, TGF-α, IL-10, CA19–9, CA125, etc.) Multiplex immunoassays 66/126 Identified lavage proteins could discriminate EC from benign conditions.
AUC (95% CI): combined: 0.91 (0.78–0.97) Sensitivity: 86.1% (combined); specificity: 87.9% (combined)
Łaniewski et al., 2022
[164]
Metabolomics and proteomics Amino acid and nucleotide metabolism biomarkers LC-MS/MS 44/43 Urine/intrauterine brushing metabolites correlate with tissue pathways (amino acid/nucleotide metabolism).
AUC: 0.808 (urine) 0.847 (intrauterine brushing);
Sensitivity: urine: 74.7% (top 5 metabolites)
Yi et al., 2022
[165]
Somatic mutations 47 genes panel (POLE, TP53, PTEN, etc.) NGS 139/107 POLE mutations indicated excellent prognosis; TP53 mutations were associated with significant DFS differences among molecular subtypes.
AUC: 0.83 (self-collected); sensitivity: 73% (clinician and self-collected); specificity: [80% (clinician-collected), 90% (self-collected)]
Pelegrina et al., 2023
[166]
DNA methylation ZSCAN12, GYPC WID-qEC 12/375 WID-qEC test demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to transvaginal ultrasound in detecting uterine cancers.
AUC (95% CI): 0.943 (0.847–1.000); sensitivity (95% CI):90.9% (62.3–98.4); specificity (95% CI): 92.1% (88.9–94.4)
Evans et al., 2023 [167]
Proteomics SERPINH1, VIM, TAGLN, PPIA, CSE1L, CTNNB1 MS 22/19 Six protein biomarkers in cervical fluids were identified to distinguish women with abnormal uterine bleeding who are EC and those who are non-EC.
AUC: [UF: > 0.71, LDHA, ENO1, PKM: > 0.9; M1: up to 0.83 (SERPINH1); M3: up to 0.84 (TAGLN)]; sensitivity: [M1: up to 83%; M3: up to 89%]; specificity: [M1: up to 81%; M3: up to 78%]
Martinez-Garcia et al., 2023 [168]
DNA methylation ZSCAN12, GYPC WID-qEC 28/74 The WID-qEC test reliably detected uterine cancers (endometrial and cervical) across sampling devices and collection methods (gyn. vs. patient self-sampling).
AUC (95% CI): 0.96 (0.91–1.00); sensitivity: 92.9% (gyn), 75.0% (self); specificity: 98.6% (gyn), 100.0% (self)
Illah et al., 2024
[169]
DNA methylation CDO1m, CELF4m qMSP 21/275 Dual-gene methylation showed high sensitivity (85.7%) and specificity (87.6%) for EC screening.
AUC (95% CI): 0.867 (0.788–0.946) for dual methylation; sensitivity (95% CI): 85.7% (0.707–1.000); specificity: 87.6% (0.837–0.915)
Zhao et al., 2024 [170]
DNA methylation CDO1, CELF4 qPCR 40/98 Combined test specificity (95.9%) outperformed transvaginal ultrasound (ET) and CA125 and detected all Type II EC cases.
AUC (95% CI): 0.917 (0.853–0.91) for combined test; sensitivity (95% CI): 87.5% (73.2–95.8); specificity: 95.9% (89.9–98.9)
Cai et al., 2024
[171]
Proteomics HPT, LG3BP, FGA, LY6D, IGHM SWATH-MS 53/65 Cervico-vaginal fluid protein signatures showed superior accuracy over plasma in detecting Stage I EC and advanced tumors effectively.
AUC (95% CI): [cervico-vaginal: 0.95 (0.91–0.98), plasma: 0.87 (0.81–0.93)]; sensitivity: [cervico-vaginal: 91% (83–98%), plasma: 75% (64–86%)]; specificity: [cervico-vaginal: 86% (78–95%), plasma: 84% (75–93%)]
Njoku et al., 2024
[172]
Proteomics Angiopoietin-2, endoglin, FAP, MIA, VEGF-A Multiplex immunoassays 66 EC/108 benign Five key biomarkers were significantly elevated in EC. The multivariate model showed prognostic value for tumor grade, size, invasion, and MMR status.
AUC: 0.918; sensitivity: 87.8%; specificity: 90.7%
Harris et al., 2024
[173]
Metabolomics Lipids, amino acids, and other metabolites UPLC-MS 66/108 Metabolic dysregulation was linked to tumor characteristics (size, myometrial invasion); noninvasive detection and risk stratification improved; multivariate models achieved high diagnostic accuracy.
AUC: 0.800–0.951 (25-feature model); sensitivity: 78.6% (for EC); specificity: 83.3% for EC, 79.6% for benign
Lorentzen et al., 2024
[174]
Tampons
DNA methylation 28 Methylated DNA markers qMSP 100/92 The sensitivity to detecting EC was high even when vaginal fluid samples were collected before endometrial sampling.
AUC (95% CI): 0.91 (0.85–0.97); sensitivity (95% CI):82% (70–91%); specificity (95% CI): 96% (87–99%)
Bakkum-Gamez et al., 2023
[175]
Cervical scrapings and vaginal swabs
Genomic DNA 100 EC-related genes NGS 39/11 Cervical swab-based gDNA genomic data demonstrated enhanced detection ability and enabled patient classification.
Sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 100%
Kim et al., 2022
[176]
DNA methylation BHLHE22, CDO1 MPap 494 EC MPap test showed high sensitivity and
specificity for EC detection.
AUC (95% CI): [Stage 1: 0.91 (0.87–0.94), Stage 2: 0.90 (0.84–0.95)]; sensitivity (95% CI): [Stage 1: 92.9% (80.5–98.5%), Stage 2: 92.5% (82.9–100.0%)]; specificity (95% CI): [Stage 1: 71.5% (64.8–77.5%), Stage 2: 73.8% (67.6–79.4%)]
Wen et al., 2022
[177]
DNA methylation GYPC, ZSCAN12 qPCR 562 (various groups) The WID-qEC test offered a non-invasive EC screening and triage with high sensitivity and specificity.
AUC: 0.94 (Barcelona); sensitivity: [97.2% (FORECEE), 90.1% (Barcelona), 100% (PMB cohort)]; specificity: [75.8% (FORECEE), 86.7% (Barcelona), 89.1% (PMB cohort)]
Herzog et al., 2022
[178]
DNA methylation ADCYAP1, BHLHE22, CDH13, CDO1, GALR1, GHSR, HAND2, SST, ZIC1 qMSP 103/317 DNA methylation marker analysis in urine, cervicovaginal self-samples, and
clinician-taken cervical scrapes achieved high diagnostic accuracy for EC detection.
AUC: [urine: 0.95, self-samples: 0.94, scrapes: 0.97]; sensitivity: [urine: 90%,
self-samples: 89%, scrapes: 93%]; specificity: [urine: 90%, self-samples: 92%, scrapes: 90%]
Wever et al., 2023
[179]
DNA methylation RASSF1A, HIST1H4F qPCR 19/75 Methylation levels of RASSF1A/HIST1H4F increased with endometrial lesion severity.
AUC: RASSF1A: 0.938; HIST1H4F: 0.951
Wang et al., 2024
[180]
Other samples
cfDNA KRAS, PIK3CA NGS, qPCR 50/7 KRAS/PIK3CA mutations were detected in 47.4% of peritoneal lavages and correlated with tumor tissue. Mayo-de-las-Casas et al., 2020
[181]
Metabolomics and proteomics SOAT1, CE ELISA, colorimetric assay, RT-qPCR, IHC 32/16 SOAT1 and CE may be associated with malignancy, aggressiveness, and poor prognosis.
AUC: peritoneal fluid SOAT1: 0.767; sensitivity: 80%; specificity: 67%
Ayyagari et al., 2023
[182]