Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;136(2):126–138. doi: 10.1037/bne0000497

Table 4.

Performance on Object Pair 2 Reversal Testing

Group Monkey Rev 1 Trials Rev 1 Errors Rev 2 Trials Rev 2 Errors Rev 3 Trials Rev 3* Errors Rev 4 Trials Rev 4 Errors
Control (n=4) AM352 140 68 50 32 80 33 230 102
AM347c 260 128 230 102 260 82 200 110
AM350c 140 65 140 65 80 41 110 46
AM340 170 86 80 102 110 35 140 54
Mean 176 86 123 59 133 48 170 78
SD 57 29 79 32 86 23 55 33
Treated (n=4) AM344c 80 20 20 11 46 11 20 4
AM349c 140 44 110 47 170 51 110 51
AM312c 80 35 80 24 80 28 80 35
AM310c 110 60 110 47 92 45 110 43
Mean 103 40 80 32 97 34 80 32
SD 29 17 42 19 52 18 42 20

Total trials and errors taken during each reversal for Object Pair 2 testing. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed an overall effect of reversal but not treatment [F(3,18) = 4.74, p=.0.01], pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections show that fewer errors were made during the 3rd reversal compared to the 1st (p < 0.006).