Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 13;15:29738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97186-x

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Electrophysiological modulation of co-culture glutamatergic neurons with TTX. (a) Timeline of TTX exposure experiment steps. (b) Brightfield contrast pictures of compartmentalized glutamatergic neurons culture in Ch1 and Ch3, with the color legend of each compartment. (c) Raster plots before/after neuronal exposure of TTX in channel 1 or in channel 3. Bar graphs showing (d,e) MFR, (f,g) WMFR and (h,i) synchrony index in each step of TTX exposure in channels and in microchannels respectively. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA to evaluate the effects of Ch1, Ch3, 1µ2 and 2µ3 and their interaction in time. Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was used as a post-hoc analysis to compare specific group means. * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001 and **** p-value < 0.001. Error bar = SD. TTX: tetrodotoxin. MFR: mean firing rate, WMFR: weighted mean firing rate.