Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):5385–5397. doi: 10.62347/ETGF1320

Table 3.

Comparison of mammographic data

Characteristics Total n = 354 Progression n = 122 Non-progression n = 232 Z/χ2 p
Tumor length (mm) 20.50 (16.00, 27.25) 23.00 (17.00, 30.25) 19.00 (15.00, 26.00) -3.523 < 0.001
Tumor shape 1.836 0.175
    Round/Oval 251 (70.9%) 81 (66.4%) 170 (73.3%)
    Irregular 103 (29.1%) 41 (33.6%) 62 (26.7%)
Tumor density 1.077 0.299
    Low/Equal 50 (14.1%) 14 (11.5%) 36 (15.5%)
    High 304 (85.9%) 108 (88.5%) 196 (84.5%)
Tumor margin 0.009 0.925
    Circumscribed/Obscured 15 (4.2%) 5 (4.1%) 10 (4.3%)
    Indistinct 339 (95.8%) 117 (95.9%) 222 (95.7%)
Parenchyma 11.418 0.001
    Negative 107 (30.2%) 23 (18.9%) 84 (36.2%)
    Positive 247 (69.8%) 99 (81.1%) 148 (63.8%)
Trabecula 8.285 0.004
    Negative 84 (23.7%) 18 (14.8%) 66 (28.4%)
    Positive 270 (76.3%) 104 (85.2%) 166 (71.6%)
Halo Sign 0.000 0.992
    Negative 232 (65.5%) 80 (65.6%) 152 (65.5%)
    Positive 122 (34.5%) 42 (34.4%) 80 (34.5%)