Table 4.
Multinomial logistic regression: associations between binge drinking and alcohol delivery policies
| Not current binge drinking vs. current binge drinking | Not current drinking vs. current binge drinking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | aOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95% CI |
| (Intercept) | 1.01 | 0.47, 2.18 | 0.46 | 0.2, 1.05 |
| Policies | ||||
| On-premises delivery | 1.31 | 0.74, 2.33 | 1.99 | 1.06, 3.71 |
| Off-premises delivery | 0.80 | 0.49, 1.31 | 0.46 | 0.28, 0.77 |
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, years | ||||
| 22–24 | Ref | Ref | ||
| 14–17 | 2.25 | 0.84, 6.03 | 18.70 | 7.63, 45.82 |
| 18–21 | 1.14 | 0.79, 1.66 | 2.64 | 1.74, 4.02 |
| Race/ethnicity | ||||
| White | Ref | Ref | ||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0.47 | 0.22, 1.03 | 0.92 | 0.41, 2.03 |
| Asian | 1.23 | 0.53, 2.85 | 1.41 | 0.56, 3.54 |
| Black | 0.61 | 0.34, 1.11 | 0.72 | 0.37, 1.37 |
| Hispanic/Latinx | 0.63 | 0.38, 1.03 | 0.78 | 0.45, 1.33 |
| Multiracial | 0.68 | 0.34, 1.36 | 0.88 | 0.41, 1.89 |
| Sexual identity | ||||
| Straight | Ref | Ref | ||
| Asexual/ace spectrum | 0.73 | 0.17, 3.19 | 4.13 | 1.25, 13.62 |
| Bisexual/pansexual | 1.35 | 0.79, 2.30 | 0.88 | 0.50, 1.56 |
| Gay/lesbian | 0.87 | 0.48, 1.56 | 0.62 | 0.33, 1.15 |
| Queer | 1.16 | 0.59, 2.29 | 0.56 | 0.26, 1.19 |
| Questioning | 1.53 | 0.42, 5.58 | 0.74 | 0.17, 3.24 |
| Gender identity | ||||
| Woman/girl | Ref | Ref | ||
| Agender | – | – | – | – |
| Gender queer | 0.11 | 0.03, 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.10, 1.01 |
| Man/boy | 0.65 | 0.40, 1.07 | 0.93 | 0.56, 1.55 |
| Non-binary | 0.81 | 0.34, 1.90 | 0.63 | 0.26, 1.52 |
| Questioning | – | – | – | – |
| Gender modality | ||||
| Cisgender | Ref | Ref | ||
| Trans and gender diverse | 2.03 | 0.98, 4.17 | 2.98 | 1.45, 6.14 |
| Not sure | – | – | – | – |
“–” Unstable estimates due to small sample cells. Log-likelihood: − 726.32; McFadden R2: 0.10035; likelihood ratio test: χ2 = 162.03 (p < 0.0001). aOR is adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI is 95% confidence intervals. Boldface indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05