Table 2.
Repeat Length in |
||||
Father | Offspring | Age Difference(years) | Offspring Affected? | Probability of Mutationa |
34 | 36 | 31 | No | .21 |
35 | 36 | 36 | No | .52 |
31 | 44 | 34 | Yes | 1.7×10-7 |
33 | 44 | 27 | Yes | 2.1×10-6 |
35 | 45 | 27 | Yes | 1.2×10-4 |
30 | 49 | NA | Yes | NA |
34 | 43 | NA | Yes | NA |
27 | 38 | NA | Yes | NA |
Note.— Because of the specific interest that the research groups (e.g., Goldberg et al. 1993, 1995; Chong et al. 1997) have in these patients, new mutations may be slightly overrepresented in the CMMT database. To be conservative, we have included only examples in which DNA is available from both parents. In two additional cases, DNA from only one parent is available; in four other cases, the new mutation has been inferred on the basis of the repeat length in sibs.
Under the mitotic model.