Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 7;139(5):2189–2206. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03488-0

Table 4.

Description of the multiple correspondence analysis’s axes. Significant correlations of the variables with the first two dimensions are shown. Category: (-) trait absence, (+) trait presence. Abbreviations of the variables: exCFxTrans– transversal concentric fracture exit; extBev– external bevelling; CFxLong– longitudinal concentric fracture entry; flakeDef– wing flake defect; vShape– V-shape; steBreak– stepped breakout; TF– tip fragmentation; TFdist– tip fragmentation distal to the entry; flake– wing flake; exCFxLong– longitudinal concentric fractures exit; TFprox– tip fragmentation proximal to the entry; intBev– internal bevelling; grey– grey discolouration

Percentage of the variance Variable Category R2 p-value
Dim 1 (34,83%) Sample group Grazing 0,8944 7,656e-12
exCFxTrans - 0,7382 1,224e-09
extBev - 0,7203 3,111e-09
CFxLong - 0,5730 1,290e-06
flakeDef - 0,4436 5,879e-05
vShape - 0,3881 2,358e-04
steBreak - 0,3624 4,327e-04
TF - 0,3611 4,460e-04
TFdist - 0,3164 1,213e-03
flake - 0,3156 1,237e-03
exCFxLong + 0,1572 3,010e-02
Dim 2 (15,52%) TFprox + 0.5015 1.198e-05
intBev - 0.4634 3.478e-05
exCFxLong + 0.2993 1.756e-03
TF + 0.2292 7.445e-03
grey + 0.2270 7.774e-03
Sample group Posterior 0.3377 3.026e-02
CFxLong - 0.1387 4.265e-02