Table 2.
Key culture parameters influencing charge Heterogeneitya.
| Parameter | Cell line | Rangeb | Effectc |
Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acidic | Basic | ||||
| Temperature (ºC) | CHO-K1 | 31, 34, 37 | Affected | Increases | Sissolak et al.36 |
| CHO-DG44 | 35, 36.5 | Decreases | Affected | Weng et al.21 | |
| CHO | 29, 32, 35, 37 | Increases | N/A | Tang et al.37 | |
| CHO | 33, 35, 37 | Decreases | N/A | Kishishita et al.57 | |
| CHO-K1 HP & LP | 33 → 37 | Decreases | Increases | Zhu et al.19 | |
| CHO-K1 | 30, 32, 34 | Increases | Decreases | Zheng et al.47 | |
| CHO | 33, 35, 37 | N/A | Increases | Luo et al.42 | |
| CHO | 32, 35, 37 | Decreases | Increases | Zhang et al.50 | |
| CHO | 31 → 35 | Decreases | N/A | Yang et al.58 | |
| CHO | 34 → 36.5 | Increases | N/A | Chung et al.25 | |
| CHO-K1 GS | 30, 32, 33.5, 35, 36.5 | Decreases | Increases | McHugh et al.59 | |
| rCHO | 30, 33, 37 | Decreases | Increases | Yoon et al.60 | |
| GS CHO1, DG44 CHO2 | 32, 33, 34, 35, 36.5, 37.5, 38.5 | Decreases | Increases | Xu et al.61 | |
| CHO | 36, 37, 38 | Increases | N/A | Horvath et al.45 | |
| pH | CHO | 6.8, 7, 7.2 | Increases | Affected | Brunner et al.31 |
| CHO-S | 7.05, 7.15 | Increases | Decreases | Rouiller et al.52 | |
| GS‐CHO | 6.7, 6.9, 7.1 | Increases | Decreases | Lee et al.18 | |
| CHO | 5.5 → 7 | Affected | N/A | Trexler‐Schmidt et al.62 | |
| GS-CHO | 6.75±0.1 → 6.95±0.1 | Decreases | N/A | Xie et al.44 | |
| CHO | 6.85±0.05 → 7.15±0.05 | N/A | N/A | Zheng et al.51 | |
| CHO | 7 → 7.3 | Increases | N/A | Horvath et al.45 | |
| Culture duration (days)d | CHO-DG44 | 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 | Increases | N/A | Weng et al.21 |
| CHO | 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 | Increases | N/A | Tang et al.,37 | |
| CHO | 12 vs. 14 | N/A | Decreases | Luo et al.42 | |
| GS-CHO | 5, 8, 10, 12, 14 | Increases | N/A | Lee et al.18 | |
| CHO-K1 GS | 3, 8, 12 | Increases | N/A | Park et al.63 | |
| CHO-K1 GS | 3, 6, 9 | Increases | N/A | McHugh et al.59 | |
| Ambient Light (lux) | CHO | 1000, 3000, 10000 | Increases | Increases | Mallaney et al.20 |
| Feed media age (weeks)e | CHO | 3 → 10 | Increases | N/A | Chung et al.25 |
| Passage number | GS-CHO | PN-10 → PN-60 | Decreases | Decreases | Kaur et al.26 |
| CHO DG44 | P5 → P33 | N/A | Increases | Xu et al.53 | |
| pCO2%) | CHO | 5 → 20 | Affected | Increases | Brunner et al.31 |
| pO2%) | CHO | 10 → 40 | N/A | Increases | Brunner et al.31 |
| Process mode | CHO | Traditional Fed-batch vs. Concentrated Fed-batch | Decreases | N/A | Yang et al.58 |
| Seed density (PCV%) | CHO | 0.12 → 0.36 | Affected | N/A | Horvath et al.45 |
aAll products are mAbs, and all media used are chemically defined.
b“→” indicates a change from one value to another; “vs.” compares two values; commas separate multiple values for the same parameter.
cEach parameter’s impact on charge variants is classified as Increase, Decrease, Affected (without a consistent trend), or N/A (no data or negligible impact reported).
dAll the studies included in this table for culture duration employ a fed-batch cultivation method.
eThis parameter primarily refers to the duration of storage for prepared liquid media, which can affect stability and component integrity. Dry powder media are generally unaffected until reconstitution.