Table 4.
Main objectives of the secondary reviews
| Secondary Reviews | Objectives |
|---|---|
| (SR3) Erdogan and Tarhan [10] | Pathway analysis methods. |
| Mining tool analysis. | |
| Combination of process mining with other techniques. | |
| (SR4) Kurniati et al. [9] | Addressing data heterogeneity issues. |
| Declarative process mining. | |
| Verification of common pathways. | |
| (SR6) Erdogan and Tarhan [28] | Proposition of new methods. |
| Process variation analysis. | |
| Obtaining empirical results. | |
| (SR7) Kusuma et al. [8] | Proposition of new approaches for process model extraction. |
| Prediction or recommendation of clinical pathways. | |
| Deviation detection analysis in clinical pathways. | |
| (SR8) Batista and Solanas [12] | Comparison between different healthcare processes. |
| Exploring healthcare processes. | |
| Validating the use of mining in healthcare. | |
| (SR14) Dallagassa et al. [31] | Pre-processing of information. |
| Predictive analysis for case management. | |
| Algorithm and methodology development. | |
| (SR15) De Roock and Martin [32] | Key performance indicator (KPI) analysis. |
| Application of process mining algorithms. | |
| Algorithm development. | |
| (SR17) Guzzo et al. [26] | Process analysis. |
| Pre-processing. | |
| Simulation. |
Source: The authors