TO THE EDITOR:
A rapid decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is a hallmark of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progression. Airway-occluding mucus plugs (MP) are observed in 41%-67% of individuals with COPD and are associated with decreased FEV1 in cross-sectional studies.1-3 While the formation of MPs is dynamic, with some persisting and others resolving over time,1 the impact of changes in MPs on FEV1 decline in COPD remains unknown. We hypothesized that persistent MPs are associated with a rapid decline in FEV1.
We analyzed participants of the COPDGene study who smoked ≥10 pack-years and were diagnosed with COPD by spirometry at baseline.4 MPs were surveyed on computed tomography (CT) scans at baseline (phase 1) and 5-year follow-up (phase 2).3 Participants were categorized into four MP change categories: Persistently negative (no MP at either phase), Resolved (MP present only at phase 1), Newly formed (MP present only at phase 2), and Persistently positive (MP present at both phases).1 We used multivariable regression models to examine associations between MP change categories and FEV1 decline. Details are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Among 4,363 participants with mucus plug assessment at baseline, 2,118 had 5-year follow-up CT and spirometry data (Figure S1). The MP change status was as follows: Persistently negative, 934 (44.1%); Resolved, 341 (16.1%); Newly formed, 417 (19.7%); Persistently positive, 426 (20.1%). Tables S1, S2, and S3 show participants’ characteristics at phases 1 and 2 and those excluded from the study, respectively. Table S4 shows participants’ representativeness.
Compared to the Persistently negative group (reference), the FEV1 decline was faster by 23.2 ml/year (95%-CI: 15.0, 31.4) and 17.7 ml/year (95%-CI: 11.3, 24.1) in the Persistently positive and Newly formed groups, respectively, while no significant difference was observed in the Resolved group (2.2 ml/year; 95%-CI: −5.3, 9.6) (Figure 1A-B, Table S5). When including an interaction term between the MP change category and smoking status, the steepest decline in FEV1 occurred in the Persistently positive group’s participants who resumed smoking and the slowest was in the Resolved group’s participants who quit smoking (Figure 1C).
Figure 1.

(A) Unadjusted post-bronchodilator FEV1 in mL at the baseline and 5-year follow-up visits by mucus plug change category. (B) Estimated marginal means of post-bronchodilator FEV1 (mL/year) changes by mucus plug change category (negative numbers indicate decline). Marginal means are estimated by a multivariable linear regression model adjusting for age, sex, race, BMI, height, pack-years, change in smoking status, baseline FEV1, history of asthma, history of congestive heart failure, CT measures of wall thickness and emphysema and baseline mucus plug score. (C) Estimated marginal means with the same multivariable model, including interaction between mucus plug change and smoking status change. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. See Table S5 for complete results.
Persistent and newly formed MPs were associated with a faster decline in FEV1, which was more pronounced among those who resumed or continued smoking. The main limitations included cohort attrition during follow-up and a study population limited to two races and heavy tobacco use. Recent asthma trials indicated that medical therapy could reduce MPs.5 Further research into the biology, clinical implications, and interventions targeting this pathology in COPD is warranted.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by NHLBI grants U01 HL089897 and U01 HL089856 and by NIH contract 75N92023D00011. The COPDGene study (NCT00608764) has also been supported by the COPD Foundation through contributions made to an Industry Advisory Committee that has included AstraZeneca, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sunovion. Dr. Diaz is supported by NHLBI grants R01-HL149861, R01-HL164824, and R01-HL173017.
Footnotes
A list of the COPDGene investigators is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is an Author Accepted Manuscript, which is the version after external peer review and before publication in the Journal. The publisher’s version of record, which includes all New England Journal of Medicine editing and enhancements, is available at https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2502456.
References
- 1.Okajima Y, Come CE, Nardelli P, et al. Luminal Plugging on Chest CT Scan: Association With Lung Function, Quality of Life, and COPD Clinical Phenotypes. Chest 2020;158:121–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dunican EM, Elicker BM, Henry T, et al. Mucus Plugs and Emphysema in the Pathophysiology of Airflow Obstruction and Hypoxemia in Smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203:957–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diaz AA, Orejas JL, Grumley S, et al. Airway-Occluding Mucus Plugs and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Jama 2023;329:1832–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, et al. Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD 2010;7:32–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nordenmark LH, Hellqvist A, Emson C, et al. Tezepelumab and Mucus Plugs in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Asthma. NEJM Evid 2023;2:EVIDoa2300135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
