Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2025 Aug 16;13(8):e70782. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70782

Drying Temperature and Storage Duration for the Retention of Bioactive Compounds of Selected Wild Edible Plants From Ethiopia

Tamene Daba Rumicha 1,2,✉, Frafis Hirko 1, Sirawdink Fikreyesus Forsido 1, Yetenayet Bekele Tola 1, Abebe Yimer 1, Chala G Kuyu 1, Tilahun A Teka 1, Addisalem Hailu 1
PMCID: PMC12357175  PMID: 40822526

ABSTRACT

Foods rich in bioactive compounds significantly prevent chronic diseases; however, these compounds are susceptible to drying temperature and storage duration because they lose some of their functionalities. This study aimed to determine effective drying temperatures and storage durations for better retention of bioactive compounds of three Ethiopian wild edible plants: Mussaenda arcuata, Celosia trigyna , and Pteridium aquilinum . The collected samples were oven‐dried at 60°C, 65°C, and 70°C in a convective oven dryer to equilibrium moisture content and cooled to room temperature and analyzed for ascorbic acid, β‐carotene, total flavonoid and phenolic contents. To select an appropriate mathematical model for drying, parameters to determine the drying kinetics were also collected simultaneously. The results showed that the dried sample at 60°C exhibited better retention of ascorbic acid, β‐carotene, and flavonoids, except for the phenolic content of Celosia trigyna at 65°C. Drying kinetics results in the Henderson and Pabis's model best fitted for Mussaenda arcuata and Celosia trigyna , while a two‐term model is fitted for Pteridium aquilinum . After determining the optimum drying temperature, the samples were then packed with polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature for 12 months. The phytochemical contents were also analyzed at 0, 4, 8, and 12 months to determine the optimal storage time. Storage analysis over 12 months showed significant degradation of bioactive components, particularly ascorbic acid in Mussaenda arcuata (47.57% loss within 4 months), with a half‐life time of 4.56 months. Therefore, drying at 60°C and consuming the products in 4 to 6 months ensures better retention of bioactive compounds, supporting the effective use of wild edible plants to promote improved nutrition, sustainable food processing, and improved food and health security in both rural and urban communities.

Keywords: β‐carotene, ascorbic acid, bioactive compounds, drying kinetics, flavonoids, phenols, storage duration


Wild edible plants are rich in bioactive compounds like ascorbic acid, beta‐carotene, flavonoids, and phenols, which offer significant health benefits but are highly sensitive to heat, light, and oxygen. To preserve these nutrients, drying should be done at optimal temperatures. Proper drying and storage techniques help maintain the nutritional quality and extend the shelf life of these valuable plants.

graphic file with name FSN3-13-e70782-g004.jpg

1. Introduction

Wild edible plants are considered easily accessible sources of micronutrients, macronutrients, and bioactive compounds for rural communities in Ethiopia, especially during periods of food shortage. Even during favorable rainy seasons, when the fruits ripen, children commonly consume these plants while herding cattle. Many wild edible plants are fruits and vegetables that are potential sources of bioactive compounds such as vitamins (β‐carotene and vitamins C and E) and polyphenols (flavonoids, tannins, and catechins) that have antioxidant activities (Yimer et al. 2023; Jiru et al. 2023; Tsehay et al. 2023; Kwinana‐Mandindi 2015; Deng et al. 2013; Wong et al. 2006). Their great potential makes them good candidates to be produced at the commercial level to contribute to the efforts to secure the food and nutrition of Ethiopia.

Mussaenda arcata fruits, Celosia trigyna leaves, and Pteridium aquilinum fronds are wild edible plants traditionally consumed for both food and medicinal purposes in the southern and southwestern regions of Ethiopia. These species are notable for their high nutritional value, optimal mineral composition, and acceptable levels of antinutritional factors (Rumicha, Belew, et al. 2025; Rumicha, Forsido, et al. 2025).

Bioactive compounds (polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, glucosinolates, alkaloids, and saponins) are naturally present chemical components in plant‐based foods that provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition. These substances exhibit a range of physiological properties in our body. In addition to their nutritional value, antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cardioprotective activities contribute to the prevention of disease and overall health improvement (Guaadaoui et al. 2014; Kris‐Etherton et al. 2002). They contribute to disease prevention through various interconnected mechanisms, regulation of gene expression, modulation of enzymatic activities, immune system support, and antimicrobial action (Liu et al. 2005; Liu 2004).

However, they are perishable by nature due to their high moisture and nutrient content, which hinders their storage and use during off‐seasons. It is also difficult to harvest and supply to distant markets due to the absence of cold‐chain facilities. However, optimal drying and storage of dried products can help to harvest them during the rainy season and be used or shipped to distant markets.

By removing moisture, drying prevents microbial growth, allowing produce to be stored for months or even years without refrigeration. This method is particularly beneficial in reducing food spoilage, which contributes to the reduction of global food loss (FAO 2019). The convenience of dried foods also makes them ideal for traveling and cooking. Furthermore, drying is an environmentally friendly preservation method that requires less energy compared to freezing or canning (Rahman et al. 2007).

Even with careful harvesting, handling, and processing, bioactive compounds such as vitamin C, polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, and other phytochemicals are highly prone to degradation due to factors like heat, oxidation, and prolonged storage. Among these, vitamin C is particularly sensitive to oxidation and temperature, making it especially vulnerable—even under ideal storage conditions (Klimczak et al. 2007; Vidinamo et al. 2021).

Drying is a key post‐harvest preservation technique for maintaining the shelf life of wild edible plants (WEPs). However, the main challenge in drying biological materials is the loss of heat‐sensitive bioactive compounds. Studies have shown that prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures during drying can significantly reduce the content of vitamin C, phenolics, carotenoids, and flavonoids (Elgamal et al. 2023; Giannakourou and Taoukis 2021). In addition, these compounds are unstable during storage and degrade at varying rates. Over time, cumulative losses reduce the nutritional value and health‐promoting properties of the dried products (Andersson et al. 2015; Debenedictis et al. 2023).

In areas where wild edible plants are abundant, local communities typically harvest, process, and consume them on the same day. Despite this traditional practice, there is limited scientific understanding of how drying methods and storage durations affect the retention of bioactive compounds in WEPs, especially under ambient conditions common in rural Ethiopia. Although traditional drying methods are widely used and help reduce spoilage, very few studies have investigated how different drying techniques impact the bioactive compounds and storage stability of WEPs. This gap in research limits the ability to recommend appropriate post‐harvest practices that preserve the full nutritional and bioactive compound potential of these plants. Furthermore, the drying behavior and kinetics of the samples were investigated, and alternative drying kinetic models were assessed to select and recommend the suitable model for future use.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Sites

The study samples were collected from two distinct locations in the southern and southwestern regions of Ethiopia (Figure 1 and 3). The selection was made based on local community practices, the reconnaissance survey, and their availability in the study areas. The samples were collected from areas rich in plant biodiversity and natural forest resources (Rumicha, Belew, et al. 2025).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Map of the study site 1 (Seri Shewa Kebele) to collect Mussaenda arcuata fruits (locally known as Mentserko).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Map of the study site 2 (Burusa Kebele) to collect samples of Celosia trigyna leaves (Amaasillo) and Pteridium aquilinum (Giixoo).

The first sampling site was in the Konta Zone, in the special distribution of Konta and the Seri Shewa Kebele (kebele is the lowest administrative level in Ethiopia). The kebele lies between approximately 6°49′ to 6°59′ N latitude and 36°36′ to 36°43′ E longitude. The fruits of Mussaenda arcuata (locally known as Mentserko) (Figure 2a) were collected from this area.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Wild edible plant species. (a) Mussaenda arcuata fruits, (b) Celosia trigyna leaves, and (c) Pteridium aquilinum fronds.

The second sampling site was the Ilubabor Zone, within the Metu district, specifically in Burrusa Kebele. This site was chosen for the collection of Celosia trigyna leaves (Amaasillo) and Pteridium aquilinum (Giixoo) fronds (Figure 2b,c). The latitude range extends from 8°15′30″ N to 8°21′0″ N, while the longitude range extends from 35°27′30″ E to 35°31′30″ E (Figure 3). The region's diverse ecological landscape makes it an ideal site for research on edible wild plants, helping to better understand their distribution and availability.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The samples were collected and transported to the Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Post Harvest Management Laboratory with an icebox and stored in a freezer at −4°C until analysis.

2.3. Experimental Design and Treatments

The samples were dried at three different drying temperatures in a completely randomized design (CRD) in triplicate. The bioactive compounds of the dried wild edible plants were analyzed at each drying temperature, and the most favorable drying temperature was identified for better retention of the bioactive compounds. The wild edible plants dried at the best drying temperature identified were packed in polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature (20°C–25°C) to investigate the storage stability of bioactive compounds for 12 months CRD was also used for the storage study in triplicate, and the parameters were analyzed at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 months of storage.

2.4. Drying Treatment

The drying experiment was carried out using a convective air oven (DHG‐9203A, Shanghai, China). Fresh and healthy fruits, leaves, and fronds of the collected samples were cleaned and trimmed before sample preparation for analysis. The samples were dried in a thin layer at 60°C, 65°C, and 70°C until there was no change in weight difference between the consecutive measurements (Muliterno et al. 2017; Faustino et al. 2007; Akpinar and Bicer 2005; Ertekin and Yaldiz 2004). The Mussaenda arcuata fruits and Pteridium aquilinum fronds were cut to size using a sharp knife. Based on measurements taken with the caliper, a uniform thickness of 2 mm was maintained for thin‐layer drying models. The same is true for Celosia trigyna leaves, and the best‐fit mathematical model was also evaluated and identified. The samples were dried until they reached a constant weight and then ground using a laboratory mill before analysis. The samples were then analyzed for ascorbic acid, β‐carotene, total flavonoid, and total phenolic content.

2.5. Packaging and Storage of the Dry Samples

The dried samples were packed in double‐layer low‐density polyethylene bags to minimize air and moisture diffusion and stored at room temperature (20°C–25°C) for 12 months. Low‐density polyethylene bags were selected due to their availability, cost, and wider use in the food industries of the country. Enough samples were stored in triplicate and analyzed after 4, 8, and 12 months of storage. The initial sample before storage time was considered a zero‐time sample to compare the parameter change with storage time.

2.6. Data Collected

2.6.1. Determination of Ascorbic Acid Content

The ascorbic acid content of the dried samples was analyzed using the titration method according to AOAC (2005). For the extraction, 10 g of dried sample powder was weighed and transferred to a 250‐mL beaker. Then, 50 mL of hot distilled water was added, and the mixture was stirred for an hour. After blending, the extract was filtered through cheesecloth and washed with 10 mL of distilled water. The filtrate was diluted to 100 mL with distilled water. A 20 mL aliquot of the sample solution was pipetted into a 250 mL conical flask, followed by the addition of 150 mL of distilled water and one milliliter of starch indicator. The solution was titrated with 0.005 M iodine solution until a persistent blue‐black color appeared, indicating the endpoint of the titration. The best drying temperature favorable to better retention of ascorbic acid was identified to indicate better nutritional retention at a specified drying temperature.

2.6.2. Determination of β‐Carotene

The β‐carotene content was determined by spectrophotometry using the method described by Sadler et al. (1990). One gram of the samples was placed in a 125‐mL flask; 100 mL of hexane–acetone–ethanol (50:25:25) and an extraction solvent containing 0.1% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were added to the flask. The suspension was wrapped in aluminum foil and agitated for 10 min on a wrist action homogenizer (PLTYRON2500E, Switzerland). The solution was then mixed with one gram of CaCl2·2H2O and gently shaken for 30 min with a mechanical shaker. After adding 15 mL of distilled H2O, the solution was shaken again for 15 min. The organic phase containing β‐carotene was separated from the water phase using a separation funnel and filtered using Whatman number 1 filter paper.

Sample handling, homogenization, and extraction were performed under low light and at 4°C to minimize photoisomerization and oxidation of carotenoids. Each sample was analyzed three times, and an average value was calculated. The β‐carotene content in the sample and β‐carotene standard (Sigma Aldrich) was estimated from absorbance read at 450 nm using spectrophotometry (V‐630; JASCO, Japan). The standard solution of stock β‐carotene (Sigma Aldrich from the USA) was made by accurately weighing 0.01 g of β‐carotene in the same solvent used to extract samples and bringing the volume to 100 mL. After the standard curve analysis, the β‐carotene content was calculated using a regression equation and expressed as mg per 100 g of edible portion.

2.6.3. Determination of Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

The total flavonoid content (TFC) of dried flour extracts was estimated using the colorimetric method (Tanvir et al. 2017). Briefly, one milliliter of extract with a concentration of 0.1 g/mL was mixed with 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite. After 5 min, 0.3 mL of 10% aluminum chloride was added, followed by 2 mL of one molar sodium hydroxide after 6 min of incubation, and the immediate addition of 2.4 mL of distilled water to produce a total volume of 10 mL. The color intensity of the flavonoid–aluminum complex was measured at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer (V‐630; JASCO, Japan). Finally, TFC was determined against the (+)‐catechin standard (Sigma Aldrich) (R 2 = 0.988) as (+)‐catechin equivalent (CE) in a concentration range of 1.00–100.00 μg/mL, and the result was expressed as milligrams of CE/100 g of sample flour.

2.6.4. Determination of Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC)

The total phenolic content (TPC) of the flour extracts was determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu method adopted by Tanvir et al. (2017). Consequently, 0.5 mL of the extract was mixed with 1.6 mL of 7.5% NaCO3 solution, followed by the addition of two milliliters of 10‐fold diluted Folin–Ciocalteu reagent reaction mixture to be incubated for one hour in the dark. The intensity of the blue complex was measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (V‐630; JASCO, Japan). Finally, the TPC present in the samples was determined using the gallic acid standard (GAE) (SPECTRUM CHEMICAL, China) (R 2 = 0.999) as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in concentration ranges of 12.50–100.00 mg/L and expressed as milligram of GAE/100 g of the flour sample.

2.7. Moisture Ratio (MR)

Moisture ratio (MR) will be calculated according to the method described by Menges and Ertekin (2006).

MR=M−MeMi−Me (1)

where, M = Moisture content (db) at time t; M e  = equilibrium moisture content (db); M i  = Initial moisture content (db) at time t = 0.

2.8. Effective Moisture Diffusivity (D eff)

The drying behavior of agricultural products during the falling rate period can be described using Fick's second law of diffusion, which models moisture movement as a mass transfer process. The general form of the diffusion equation is expressed as (Doymaz 2010).

∂M∂t=Deff∇2M (2)

where, M = the moisture content, t = time (s), D eff = the effective moisture diffusivity (m2/s), ∇2 M = the Laplacian representing the spatial distribution of moisture.

For slab geometry, assuming a uniform initial moisture distribution, negligible external resistance to mass transfer, constant diffusivity and negligible shrinkage, Crank and Gupta (1975) derived a solution to Equation (2) as follows:

MR=8π2∑n=0∞12n+12exp2n+12πDefft4L2 (3)

where MR = moisture ratio, L = half thickness of the sample (m), n = a positive integer.

For longer drying times, the higher‐order terms in the series become negligible, and Equation (3) can be approximated in logarithmic form.

lnMR=ln8π2−π2Defft4L2 (4)

This linearized form suggests that ln (MR) versus time t yields a straight line. The slope of this line, K, is related to the effective diffusivity of moisture as follows:

K=π2Deff4L2 (5)

From this slope, the value of D eff can be determined using the following.

Deff=4L2Kπ2 (6)

where D eff = the effective moisture diffusivity (m2/s), L = the thickness of the cut sample (m), K = Slope of the graph of ln (MR) again to observe the drying time.

2.9. Evaluation of Fitting Mathematical Models for Drying

Modeling the drying condition at a specified temperature is vital for the production of high‐quality and shelf‐stable products by controlling and optimizing process parameters (Clemente et al. 2011). To achieve this, data on drying kinetics and the evaluation of their mathematical models are essential in designing, simulating and optimizing the drying temperature. Seven relevant mathematical models for drying indicated in Table 1 recommended for the drying of fruits and vegetables, were evaluated for thin‐layer drying.

TABLE 1.

Selected thin‐layer mathematical models to predict drying time of wild edible plants.

Model name Model References
Newton/Lewis
MR=M−MeM0−Me=exp−k0t
Sarsavadia et al. (1999), Ayensu (1997), Liu and Bakker‐Arkema (1997), Nellist (1987), Tiris et al. (1994), Hummeida and El‐Sheikh (1989)
Pages/Modified Lewis
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=exp−ktn
Agrawal and Singh (1977), Bruce (1985), Chhinnan (1984)
Henderson and Pabis/Single term
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=A0exp−k0t
Yagcıoglu (1999), Bengston et al. (1998), Pal and Chakraverty (1997), Rahman et al. (1997)
Logarithmic
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=A0exp−k0t+C
Ertekin and Yaldiz (2001), Yagcıoglu (1999)
Two‐term
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=A0exp−k0t+A1exp−k1t
Rahman et al. (1997), Madamba et al. (1996), Verma et al. (1985), Henderson (1974)
Two‐term exponential
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=A0exp−k0t+bt
Ertekin and Yaldiz (2001), Yaldiz et al. (2001), Eldeen et al. (1980)
Diffusion approximation
MR=Mt−MeMi−Me=aexp−kt+1−aexp−kbt
Ertekin and Yaldiz (2001)

The principal criterion for choosing the best model was the coefficient of determination (R 2). A higher R 2 value closer to one represented the best fit of the model (Gunhan et al. 2005). Minimum value chi‐square (χ2), root mean square error (RMSE), the mean bias error (MBE) and the mean relative percentage error (P%) between the predicted and observed values were described for the difference in the moisture ratio of dried samples (Goyal et al. 2008). The equations with the highest R 2 and lowest MBE, RMSE, P% and X 2 were indications of the better estimate of the drying curves, and the statistical values were calculated as follows:

MR=M−MeMi−Me (7)
R2=1−∑i=1nMRexpi−MRprei2∑i=1nMRexp mean−MRpredi2 (8)
x2=∑i=1nMRexpi−MRprei2N−n (9)
RMSE=1N∑i=1nMRprei−MRexpmean212 (10)
MBE=1N∑i=1nMRprei−MRexpi2 (11)
P%=100N∑/MRexp−MRpred/MRexp (12)

where M = Moisture content (db) at time t, M e  = equilibrium moisture content (db), M i  = Initial moisture content (db) at time t = 0, MRexp i  = be the first experimental moisture ratio, MRpre i  = first predicted moisture ratio, N = number of observations, n = number of constants, MRexp mean = is the mean value of the experimental moisture ratio.

2.10. Determination of the Best Storage Duration (Half‐Life Time)

After identifying the most favorable drying temperature for better retention of bioactive compounds, dried samples from the identified drying temperature were packed in polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature (22°C ± 2.5°C) for 12 months. The samples were analyzed at the start (zero time) and at the end of 4, 8 and 12 months to determine the storage stability.

2.10.1. Determination of Half‐Life Times (t 1/2)

The half‐life time (t 1/2) of a reaction refers to the time required for the concentration of a compound to decrease to half of its initial value. This concept is widely utilized in chemistry, pharmacology, and food science to model the degradation or elimination of substances over time (Snyder et al. 2011). In the context of bioactive compounds in stored plant materials or food products, the half‐life is particularly useful for estimating the time needed for these compounds to decline to 50% of their original concentration at the start of storage (zero time), thereby aiding in the assessment of shelf life and functional stability (Nicoli et al. 1999). The concept of half‐life plays a key role in determining the hold time after storage to achieve a concentration of 50% bioactive compounds compared to the initial concentration at the start of storage (zero time).

It is important to note that the half‐life time varies between different reaction types. In the following section, different types of reactions were reviewed; the derivation of their half‐life equations was explained.

To solve for the half‐life time of first‐order reactions, the rate law of a first‐order reaction is recalled (Van Holde et al. 2006).

A=Aoe−kt (13)

It was identified as t 1/2 when

A=A02 (14)

Substituting Equation (1)

Ao2=Aoe−kt12 (15)
12=e−kt12 (16)
t12=ln2k (17)
t12=0.693k (18)

2.11. Data Analysis

The evaluation of mathematical models was performed using nonlinear regression analysis with the XLSTAT software package. Experimental data, collected in triplicate, were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Minitab 17 statistical software. Before analysis, the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were assessed to validate the use of parametric tests. The differences between treatment means were further examined using Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The results were expressed as means and standard errors of the mean and presented in tabular format.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Drying Temperature on Bioactive Compounds

3.1.1. Ascorbic Acid Content

Ascorbic acid is a water‐soluble vitamin widely present in various fruits and vegetables. It is a crucial nutrient that plays an essential role in numerous metabolic processes within the human body. It supports the proper function of key biosynthetic enzymes and acts as a cofactor in many enzymatic reactions (Hacısevki 2009). One of its most significant benefits is its antioxidant capacity, which enables it to counteract highly reactive radicals in the body (Akbari 2016).

Ascorbic acid, commonly used as an indicator of nutrient quality in fruits and vegetable food products, is highly sensitive to degradation during food processing and storage. This instability is due to its susceptibility to factors such as temperature fluctuations. In aqueous solutions, ascorbic acid is particularly unstable, as it degrades easily when exposed to normal conditions, such as heat (Santos and Silva 2008).

The present study demonstrated that drying temperature had a significant effect on the retention of ascorbic acid in the analyzed wild edible plants. Mussaenda arcuata retained approximately 72.9% of its initial ascorbic acid content when dried at 60°C, which declined dramatically to 41.1% at 70°C. Similarly, Celosia trigyna preserved 93.4% at 60°C, but only 37.4% at 70°C. Pteridium aquilinum showed a retention of 86.1% at 60°C, which dropped to 52.4% at 70°C (Table 2). The progressive loss of ascorbic acid with increasing temperature is attributed to its oxidation to dehydroascorbic acid, which further undergoes irreversible hydrolysis to form diketogulonic acid and other biologically inactive compounds (Lee and Kader 2000).

TABLE 2.

Bioactive compound content of dried WEPs at different temperatures.

WEPs Drying temperature (°C) Bioactive compound contents
Ascorbic acid (mg/100) β‐Carotene (mg/100 g) Total flavonoid content (TFC) (mg CE/100 g) Total phenolic contents (TPC) (mg GAE/100 g)
Mussaenda arcuata Fresh 132.99a ± 1.02 42.25a ± 0.19 113.52a ± 0.92 468.79a ± 1.96
60 96.88b ± 5.09 22.77b ± 0.25 101.33b ± 0.41 359.27b ± 1.47
65 62.82c ± 0.78 15.09c ± 0.15 63.75c ± 0.41 335.32c ± 4.98
70 54.61c ± 0.51 9.10d ± 0.38 55.04d ± 0.61 278.72d ± 3.21
CV (%) 3.54 2.88 1.28 1.50
Celosia trigyna Fresh 53.43a ± 1.28 46.44b ± 0.96 98.71a ± 1.01 228.52d ± 1.19
60 49.91a ± 0.78 53.55a ± 0.6 95.0a ± 0.45 306.48b ± 1.91
65 37.28b ± 0.78 46.15b ± 0.50 84.30b ± 0.98 326.75a ± 1.77
70 19.97c ± 1.06 15.01c ± 0.83 50.77c ± 1.69 268.11c ± 2.59
CV (%) 4.91 4.25 2.59 1.15
Pteridium aquilinum Fresh 73.98a ± 0.51 33.90b ± 1.23 57.32a ± 0.62 334.5a ± 2.81
60 63.71b ± 0.78 42.87a ± 0.53 38.01b ± 1.45 252.73b ± 3.19
65 51.08c ± 1.01 22.97c ± 0.10 30.04c ± 1.89 235.73c ± 2.52
70 38.75d ± 1.02 13.65d ± 0.58 20.96d ± 1.55 225.25d ± 1.36
CV (%) 2.83 4.15 8.04 2.39

Note: All the values given are means of three independent measurements ± standard error (SE). Means not followed by the same superscript letters in each column are significantly (p < 0.05) different from each other.

Abbreviations: CE, Catechin Equivalent; GAE, Gallic acid equivalent.

This degradation pathway is accelerated by exposure to heat and oxygen. Additionally, ascorbic acid degradation is known to follow first‐order reaction kinetics, where the degradation rate increases exponentially with temperature (Kumar et al. 2021). When processing temperatures exceed 60°C, the structural integrity of vitamin C is compromised, leading to a significant decline in its antioxidant function. The partial retention of ascorbic acid at 60°C observed in this study suggests that moderate drying conditions can balance effective moisture removal with the preservation of heat‐sensitive nutrients. Previous studies also support the use of controlled temperature drying to retain labile compounds such as vitamin C in plant materials (Sahari et al. 2004).

Furthermore, ascorbic acid is prone to oxidative destruction not only by heat and oxygen but also by enzymatic and non‐enzymatic reactions. Although some studies attribute degradation to oxidase enzymes, during thermal drying, the primary cause of loss is non‐enzymatic oxidation (Awuchi et al. 2020; Muzolf‐Panek et al. 2017).

In general, the findings of this study identified 60°C as the most favorable drying temperature to preserve the ascorbic acid content in all plant samples. This result aligns with observations by Elgamal et al. (2023), who reported that optimal temperatures for ascorbic acid retention in fruits and vegetables generally fall within the range of 40°C–60°C. Thus, maintaining drying temperatures within this range can be considered a best practice for conserving the nutritional and biofunctional quality of wild edible plants.

3.1.2. β‐Carotene Content

β‐carotene is a vital precursor to vitamin A, as its structure produces two retinol molecules upon conversion (Rodriguez‐Amaya 2001). In addition to its role, it functions as a potent antioxidant due to its conjugated double bonds, which allow it to stabilize reactive intermediates. It effectively quenches singlet oxygen and scavenges free radicals, thus protecting cellular tissues from oxidative damage such as lipid peroxidation (Pénicaud et al. 2011; Laguerre et al. 2007; Pérez‐Gálvez and Mínguez‐Mosquera 2001).

The findings revealed that β‐carotene retention during drying was species‐dependent and strongly influenced by temperature. In Mussaenda arcuata, the content decreased progressively with increasing temperature, with retention dropping to 53.9% at 60°C and dropping to 21.5% at 70°C. On the contrary, Celosia trigyna exhibited an unexpected increase of 115.3% at 60°C, while Pteridium aquilinum showed an increase of 26.4% at the same temperature. These gains suggest that moderate heat treatment may enhance the release or extractability of β‐carotene from plant tissues, likely due to heat‐induced softening of cell walls and disruption of carotenoid–protein or carotenoid–fiber complexes. Such structural changes facilitate the migration of intracellular compounds, increasing their bioavailability for extraction (Yuan et al. 2009; Rodriguez‐Amaya 1997).

However, when the temperature was elevated to 70°C, all three species showed substantial declines in β‐carotene retention, specifically 32.3% in Celosia trigyna and 40.3% in Pteridium aquilinum . This sharp decrease is attributed to the thermal degradation and oxidative breakdown of β‐carotene, which is highly sensitive to heat, light, and oxygen. At higher temperatures, the compound undergoes oxidative cleavage and isomerization from its stable all‐trans form to less stable cis‐isomers, reducing the activity of provitamin A (Van den Berg et al. 2000). Prolonged heating may also accelerate lipid peroxidation, exacerbating the loss of lipophilic antioxidants such as carotenoids (Läubli and Bruttel 1986).

These findings underscore the importance of drying at moderate temperatures not only to minimize nutrient degradation but also to improve measurable bioactive levels through improved extractability. Controlling the drying temperature is, therefore, critical to optimizing the retention and functional value of β‐carotene in wild edible plants.

In general, the drying temperature plays a critical role in the preservation of β‐carotene, which is a heat‐sensitive and oxygen‐labile carotenoid abundant in fruits, vegetables, and wild edible plants. Moreover, oxidative degradation intensifies at elevated temperatures, particularly during hot air or sun drying, breaking down the polyene chain into less active compounds such as apocarotenals (Chen and Huang 1998). Empirical evidence supports this trend; for example, Mbondo et al. (2018) reported that spinach dried at 50°C retained significantly more β‐carotene than samples dried at 70°C or 90°C, where losses reached up to 56%.

Thus, drying wild edible plants at 60°C appears optimal for β‐carotene retention, thus supporting their therapeutic efficacy and nutritional value.

3.1.3. Total Flavonoid Contents (TFC)

Flavonoids are a class of polyphenolic compounds characterized by a C6–C3–C6 structure consisting of three rings (A, B, and C) and include subclasses such as flavonols, flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, flavan‐3‐ols, and anthocyanidins (Khan et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2022). They are predominantly derived from fruits, vegetables, cereals, and legumes, and are well known for their health‐promoting properties, including anti‐inflammatory, anti‐aging, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities (Ganesan et al. 2021; Teng et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2020).

The findings of this study demonstrated that the retention of total flavonoid content (TFC) at 60°C was notably high for the three species, with Mussaenda arcuata retaining 89.2%, Celosia trigyna achieving 96.2%, and Pteridium aquilinum retaining 66.3%. However, at 70°C, a pronounced reduction in TFC was observed in all species, indicating that elevated drying temperatures adversely affect the stability of flavonoids. Flavonoids, a class of polyphenolic compounds with strong antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties, are moderately heat sensitive and can undergo structural degradation under high thermal conditions (Zhang and Tsao 2016). The loss of flavonoids at 70°C is likely due to thermal cleavage of glycosidic bonds that link flavonoids to sugar moieties, which, when broken, can lead to less stable aglycones that are more prone to oxidation (Kähkönen et al. 1999).

The relatively high retention of flavonoids at 60°C can be attributed to two complementary mechanisms. First, moderate heat may partially inactivate endogenous oxidative enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD), which are major contributors to postharvest flavonoid degradation. These enzymes catalyze the oxidation of flavonoid hydroxyl groups, forming quinones that subsequently polymerize into non‐functional compounds. Their thermal inactivation at 60°C helps preserve the integrity of native flavonoids (Nicoli et al. 1999). Second, the relatively low drying temperature imposes minimal thermal stress on the flavonoid molecules. Many glycosylated flavonoids, such as quercetin glucosides and kaempferol derivatives, exhibit a degree of thermal stability at moderate temperatures and can retain their antioxidant capacity without significant degradation or isomerization (Patras et al. 2010). On the contrary, excessive heat (typically > 100°C) has been shown to cause structural breakdown or conversion to less bioactive forms (Turkmen et al. 2005).

Drying at 60°C, therefore, appears to strike a favorable balance sufficient to reduce moisture content and inhibit microbial and enzymatic spoilage, while still gentle enough to avoid thermal degradation of sensitive phytochemicals. Similar results have been reported in leafy vegetables and herbal materials, where drying at 50°C–60°C retained high levels of flavonoids and preserved antioxidant activity (Rossi et al. 2003; Dewanto et al. 2002). On the contrary, elevated temperatures have consistently been associated with higher losses due to oxidation, thermal breakdown, and enzyme‐mediated degradation (Chan et al. 2007; Wojdyło et al. 2009).

The lower loss of total flavonoid contents observed in selected WEPs at drying temperatures between 60°C and 70°C might be due to oxidation reactions of hydroxyl groups that produced more polyphenols or monophenols to di‐or triphenols. Loss of total flavonoid content can also occur during typical macromolecule degradation during heat treatment, depending on drying temperature and time (Mohd Zainol et al. 2009). According to Schieber et al. (2001), the loss of phytochemicals such as flavonoids during heat treatment might be due to the harsh drying conditions, particularly the temperature and duration used.

Therefore, drying wild edible plants at 60°C can be considered an optimal condition to maximize flavonoid retention. This temperature not only minimizes thermal degradation but also may enhance extraction capacity and preserve the functional and therapeutic value of these bioactive compounds.

3.1.4. Total Phenolic Contents (TPC)

Phenolic compounds widely distributed in medicinal plants, pharmaceuticals, spices, vegetables, fruits, wild edible plants, grains, and other seeds are an important group of natural antioxidants with possible beneficial effects on human health (Pandey and Rizvi 2009). Polyphenols are widely considered very unstable and highly susceptible to degradation (Bąkowska et al. 2003). The stability of polyphenols under different conditions is an important aspect that has to be taken into account to ensure that phenolic compounds have the desired properties and maintain their activity and structure during the different stages of processing, which can involve high temperatures, light, oxygen, solvents, the presence of enzymes, proteins, metallic ions, or association with other food constituents (Casta Eda‐Ovando et al. 2009).

The study revealed differential retention and enhancement of phenolic compounds in wild edible plants subjected to thermal treatment at 60°C. Specifically, Mussaenda arcuata retained 76.6% of its original phenolic content, while Pteridium aquilinum retained 75.5%. On the contrary, Celosia trigyna exhibited a remarkable 34.1% increase in phenolic concentration compared to its fresh state. The observed variation in the initial temperature for phenolic degradation may be attributed to differences in the matrix composition and structural organization of plant tissues among species. Leaves of Celosia could have a more complex or tightly bound phenolic–protein or phenolic–fiber matrix, which could confer greater thermal stability to phenolic compounds (Howard et al. 1999; Nicoli et al. 1999). Additionally, variations in phenolic compound types (e.g., flavonoids vs. phenolic acids), their degree of polymerization, or interactions with other cellular constituents such as minerals or antioxidants can influence thermal resilience (Dai and Mumper 2010). The relatively lower degradation temperatures in Mussaenda arcuata fruits and Pteridium aquilinum fronds suggest a more labile phenolic profile or a less protective cellular environment, leading to earlier thermal breakdown under heating (Li et al. 2020; Michalska et al. 2018).

The increase in phenolic contents at 65°C in Celosia trigyna might also be due to the thermal disruption of plant cellular structures, which facilitates the release of bound phenolic compounds that are otherwise inaccessible in the intact plant matrix. Thermal processing at moderate temperatures can promote the hydrolysis of phenolic glycosides and the breakdown of complex components of the cell wall, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, thus liberating phenolics previously conjugated to these macromolecules (Yao and Ren 2011; Naczk and Shahidi 2006). The enhanced extraction capacity of phenolics during moderate heat treatment has been documented in several plant species. For example, Mehmood and Zeb (2023) reported that mild thermal processing increased the free phenolic content of spinach leaves due to cell wall degradation and subsequent release of bound phenolics. Similarly, Juániz et al. 2016 observed that heating facilitated the liberation of phenolic acids bound to dietary fibers, leading to an increase in measurable phenolic compounds.

However, phenolic compounds are also susceptible to thermal degradation at elevated temperatures or prolonged heating durations. High heat can induce oxidative degradation, polymerization, and condensation reactions of phenolics, resulting in a decrease in their concentration and antioxidant capacity (Xu and Chang 2008). For example, catechins and flavonoids can undergo oxidative polymerization, reducing their bioavailability and functional efficacy (Manach et al. 2004). Therefore, the thermal stability of phenolics is highly dependent on temperature, time, and plant matrix composition.

In general, these findings underscore the complex interplay between thermal processing and phenolic bioavailability. Moderate heat may enhance phenolic extractability and biofunctionality by breaking down plant cell walls and releasing bound compounds, while excessive heat risks degrading these valuable phytochemicals. Therefore, optimizing the thermal treatment parameters is crucial to maximize the nutritional and therapeutic potential of wild edible plants.

3.2. Drying Kinetics and Activation Energy of Dried Wild Edible Plants

As stated in Table 3, the drying behavior of wild edible plants (WEP) such as Mussaenda arcuata, Celosia trigyna , and Pteridium aquilinum demonstrates clear temperature dependence in terms of both the drying rate constant (k) and the effective moisture diffusivity. Across the three species, both the drying rate constant (k) and the moisture diffusion coefficient (D eff) increased with increasing drying temperature from 60°C to 70°C, aligning with classical drying theory that suggests higher thermal energy enhances the mobility of the water molecule and reduces resistance to internal mass transfer resistance (Doymaz 2004; Midilli et al. 2002). For example, Mussaenda arcuata showed a more than 20‐fold increase in D eff from 1.07 × 10−8 m2/s at 60°C to 2.22 × 10−7 m2/s at 70°C, highlighting its high thermal responsiveness. Similarly, its drying constant nearly doubled over the same temperature range, indicating accelerated moisture removal due to reduced water binding forces.

TABLE 3.

Constant drying kinetics, activation energy, and diffusion coefficient of selected wild edible plants in Ethiopia.

Wild edible plant Drying temperature Drying constant K Diffusion coefficient (m2/s) Activation energy (J/gmol)
Mussaenda arcuata 60°C 0.0661 1.07E‐8 0.54
65°C 0.0953 1.55E‐7 0.78
70°C 0.137 2.22E‐7 1.14
Celosia trigyna 60°C 0.070 1.25E‐9 0.57
65°C 0.095 1.70E‐9 0.79
70°C 0.144 2.58E‐9 1.17
Pteridium aquilinum 60°C 0.075 1.22E‐7 0.61
65°C 0.093 1.51E‐7 0.77
70°C 0.109 1.77E‐7 0.887

Among the species studied, Mussaenda arcuata exhibited the highest diffusion coefficient and constant drying at all temperatures, suggesting that it has a more porous or less lignified structure that facilitates moisture movement. On the contrary, Celosia trigyna consistently recorded the lowest values of the diffusion coefficient values (in the range of 10−9 m2/s), which implies a denser tissue matrix or stronger water‐binding interactions, possibly due to the higher fiber or mucilage content. This suggests that Celosia trigyna might require longer drying times or pre‐processing methods such as enzymatic treatment or blanching to enhance drying efficiency (Krokida et al. 2001).

The activation energy (Ea), which reflects the energy barrier for moisture diffusion, further supports these findings. The activation energy increased with temperature in all species, indicating that a higher thermal input is necessary to overcome internal resistance to moisture migration. Mussaenda arcuata and Celosia trigyna showed a sharp increase in Ea from 0.54 to 1.14 J/g·mol and 0.57 to 1.17 J/g·mol, respectively, suggesting that these plants contain a substantial proportion of bound water that becomes mobilized only at elevated temperatures. In comparison, Pteridium aquilinum exhibited a more modest increase in Ea (from 0.61 to 0.89 J/g·mol), implying a relatively lower energy requirement for moisture removal and more stable drying behavior under varying thermal conditions (Guiné 2018).

From an application perspective, these kinetic parameters are essential for designing efficient drying protocols that minimize energy input while retaining the nutritional and functional qualities of WEPs. Higher drying rates and diffusion coefficients, as observed in Mussaenda arcuata, are desirable for commercial‐scale drying where throughput and energy efficiency are critical. However, species like Celosia trigyna , despite slower kinetics, may benefit from low‐temperature drying to preserve thermolabile bioactives, necessitating a trade‐off between drying speed and quality retention (Araya‐Farias and Ratti 2008; Akpinar et al. 2003). Overall, understanding the drying kinetics and activation energies of these underutilized edible plants not only contributes to optimizing postharvest processing but also supports their valorization as functional food ingredients in line with the goals of the sustainable food system (Guiné 2018).

3.3. Drying Temperature and Time of Wild Edible Plants

The drying behavior of the three studied wild edible plants, Mussaenda arcuata, Celosia trigyna , and Pteridium aquilinum , demonstrated a clear inverse relationship between drying temperature and drying time. As the drying temperature increased from 60°C to 70°C, the time required for complete drying decreased significantly for all species. For example, Mussaenda arcuata required 104 min at 60°C, which was reduced to 52 min at 70°C. A similar trend was observed for Celosia trigyna and Pteridium aquilinum , whose drying times decreased from 96 to 48 min and from 120 to 80 min, respectively (Table 4). This behavior is consistent with fundamental drying kinetics, where higher temperatures increase the rate of moisture removal by accelerating the vapor pressure gradient and improving the diffusivity of water within plant tissues.

TABLE 4.

Drying temperature and time of selective wild edible plants.

Wild edible plant Thickness of slice (mm) Drying temperature (°C) Time (minutes)
Mussaenda arcuata 2 60 104
2 65 72
2 70 52
Celosia trigyna 0.21 60 96
0.21 65 66
0.21 70 48
Pteridium aquilinum 2 60 120
2 65 108
2 70 80

Among the three plants, Pteridium aquilinum consistently exhibited the longest drying times at all temperatures. This extended drying period could be attributed to several factors, including higher initial moisture content, a denser tissue structure, or lower porosity, all of which can impede internal moisture migration. On the contrary, Mussaenda arcuata dried faster than Pteridium aquilinum , despite having the same slice thickness, suggesting that species‐specific anatomical and compositional factors also influence drying efficiency. Similar observations have been reported in previous studies, where plant morphology, cellular structure, and moisture distribution were found to significantly affect drying behavior and kinetics (Doymaz 2007; Mayor and Sereno 2004).

From a processing point of view, increasing the drying temperature offers advantages in reducing processing time and energy consumption. However, higher temperatures can also pose risks of thermal degradation, especially in edible wild plants valued for their nutritional and biofunctional properties, such as antioxidants, vitamins, and phytochemicals. Therefore, selecting an optimal combination of drying temperature and slice thickness is essential to achieve a balance between efficiency and retention of bioactive compounds. These findings are particularly relevant for the development of shelf‐stable wild edible plant products and their integration into functional food systems aimed at improving nutritional diversity and nutritional security.

3.4. Selection of the Best Mathematical Drying Models

The analysis of bioactive compounds at various drying temperatures revealed that 60°C is the most effective temperature for preserving these compounds in wild edible plants (WEP). This temperature maintained an effective equilibrium between rapid moisture extraction and the protection of delicate phytochemicals, as indicated by the observed diffusivity and activation energy values. Therefore, accurate modeling of the drying process at specified temperatures (60°C) is essential for producing high‐quality, shelf‐stable products by allowing better control and optimization of the process parameters to preserve the nutritional and functional properties of the material (Clemente et al. 2011). To achieve this, reliable data on drying kinetics and the application of appropriate mathematical models are critical for designing, simulating, and optimizing drying operations.

In this context, seven commonly used thin‐layer drying models recommended in the literature for drying fruits and vegetables were evaluated to determine their suitability to describe the drying behavior of WEPs. The best fit model for each sample was selected based on several statistical indicators, including the highest coefficient of determination (R 2) and the lowest values for the mean relative percent error (P%), the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean biased error (MBE), and the chi‐square (χ2). These statistical values varied depending on the type of wild edible plant studied. Selecting the most appropriate mathematical model is crucial to understanding drying mechanisms, predicting drying kinetics, optimizing process conditions to preserve product quality, improving energy efficiency, supporting the design and scaling of drying systems, determining key kinetic parameters, and enabling the standardization and comparison of results across studies.

In the fruit of Mussaenda arcuata, the R 2, P%, RMSE, MBE, and X 2 ranged from 0.9967 to 0.13988, 0.4660 to 5.24344, 0.2699 to 0.296155, 0.00027 to 0.07460, and 0.00033 to 0.09495, respectively (Table 5). Based on the evaluation criteria, the appropriate drying model was the Henderson and Pabis model for drying the Celosia trigyna leaf and Mussaenda arcuata fruit. The finding was consistent with the previous work by Norhadi et al. (2020) in Malaysia for oven‐dried mango at 60°C.

TABLE 5.

Evaluation of models for WEPs dried at 60°C.

WEPs Statistical Parameters Mathematical models
Lewis Pages model Henderson and Pabis Logarithmic Two‐term Two‐term exponential Diffusion approximation
Mussaenda arcuata R 2 0.9962 0.9298 0.9967 0.9967 0.9967 0.1398 0.9963
X 2 0.00035 0.00565 0.00033 0.00036 0.00040 0.09495 0.00041
RMSE 0.29077 0.26113 0.29615 0.29615 0.29615 0.26990 0.29068
MBE 0.00032 0.00479 0.00028 0.00029 0.00037 0.07460 0.00032
(P%) 0.4660 1.5449 0.4509 0.6553 0.4509 5.2434 0.4659
Celosia trigyna R 2 0.9907 0.8045 0.9923 0.9862 0.9923 0.1511 0.9909
X 2 0.00083 0.01410 0.00079 0.00154 0.00094 0.07601 0.00097
RMSE 0.28769 0.24867 0.29631 0.29722 0.29629 0.26524 0.28950
MBE 0.00077 0.01209 0.00067 0.00121 0.00068 0.05972 0.00076
(P%) 0.6399 2.0767 0.6578 1.0510 0.6576 4.7533 0.63992
Pteridium aquilinum R 2 0.9830 0.8999 0.9836 0.9823 0.9877 0.2527 0.9831
X 2 0.00170 0.00940 0.00224 0.00229 0.00177 0.12126 0.00201
RMSE 0.28512 0.26537 0.32020 0.29853 0.29999 0.26076 0.28512
MBE 0.00138 0.00705 0.00168 0.00157 0.00111 0.08337 0.00138
(P%) 0.8680 2.0507 0.9516 0.9810 0.8127 4.9296 0.86798

Note: Bold values indicate the statistically significant best fit for the selected appropriate models.

The model for the drying of the Pteridium aquilinum frond was a two‐term model, which is in agreement with the study conducted in Malaysia on pumpkin drying kinetics; the goodness‐of‐fit model was identified as a two‐term model (Onwude et al. 2016).

3.5. Storage Stability Study

3.5.1. Ascorbic Acid Content During Storage

The study findings revealed that ascorbic acid retention during storage varied significantly among the three wild edible plants (WEPs) examined. Mussaenda arcuata retained 52.43% of its initial ascorbic acid content after 4 months of storage, which decreased sharply to 21.82% at the end of one year. Similarly, Celosia trigyna exhibited 57.06% retention at 4 months, decreasing to 25.83% after 12 months of storage. Pteridium aquilinum showed a similar trend, with 57.75% retention at 4 months, dropping to 23.73% after one year (Table 6). These results demonstrate that ascorbic acid is highly unstable over time, with all three species experiencing more than 70% degradation over the 12‐month storage period. As a water‐soluble and highly labile compound, ascorbic acid is particularly susceptible to oxidative degradation in the presence of oxygen, light, heat, and metal ions (Lee and Kader 2000). Among the WEPs studied, Mussaenda arcuata exhibited the most rapid loss (final retention of 21.82%), which may be attributed to a soft tissue structure or lower concentrations of endogenous protective compounds such as polyphenols and flavonoids (Dai and Mumper 2010). On the contrary, Pteridium aquilinum retained slightly more ascorbic acid (23.73%), possibly due to a denser, more fibrous matrix and a stronger antioxidant environment that helps mitigate oxidative damage. Celosia trigyna , with intermediate retention (25.83%), may have a moderately protective phytochemical profile that contributes to its relative stability.

TABLE 6.

The contents of bioactive compounds of WEPs consumed in Ethiopia dried at 60°C.

WEPs Storage time (months) Bioactive compound contents
Ascorbic acid (mg/100 g) (%) of retention β‐Carotene (mg/100) (%) of retention Total flavonoid content (TFC) (mg CE/100 g) (%) of retention Total phenolic compounds (TFC) (mg GAE/100 g) Increase/(%) of retention
Mussaenda arcuata 0 96.88a ± 5.09 22.77a ± 0.25 101.33a ± 0.41 359.27b ± 1.47
4 50.79b ± 0.78 52.43 14.19b ± 0.38 62.32 65.42b ± 0.52 66.55 415.32a ± 5.56 +15.61
8 28.77c ± 1.06 29.72 10.06c ± 0.27 44.18 38.33c ± 0.94 37.83 376.41b ± 4.14 +4.77
12 21.14c ± 0.87 21.82 5.98d ± 0.17 26.26 24.25d ± 0.93 23.93 290.83c ± 5.93 80.95
Half life time (months) 4.6 6.8 5.7 —
Celosia trigyna 0 49.91a ± 0.78 53.55a ± 0.6 95.0a ± 0.45 306.48b ± 1.91
4 28.48b ± 0.78 57.06 38.36b ± 0.78 71.63 54.37b ± 3.76 57.23 343.65a ± 2.75 +12.13
8 17.91c ± 2.69 35.88 19.84c ± 1.42 37.05 42.72c ± 0.49 44.97 321.80b ± 5.89 +5.0
12 12.89d ± 0.51 25.83 18.41c ± 0.17 34.38 34.15c ± 1.93 35.95 251.65c ± 4.51 82.11
Half life time (months) 5.0 5.6 6.9 —
Pteridium aquilinum 0 63.71a ± 0.78 42.87a ± 0.53 38.01a ± 1.45 252.73b ± 3.19
4 35.52b ± 1.06 57.75 23.51b ± 0.79 54.84 24.88b ± 0.89 65.46 282.53a ± 4.14 +11.83
8 20.84c ± 1.83 32.71 17.31c ± 0.06 43.38 14.27c ± 0.27 37.54 266.48b ± 3.53 +5.46
12 15.12d ± 0.82 23.73 9.25d ± 0.22 21.58 6.78d ± 0.82 17.84 205.25c ± 2.52 81.21
Half life time (months) 5.4 6.1 5.6 —

Note: All the values given are means of three independent measurements ± standard error (SE). Means not followed by the same superscript letters in each column are significantly (p < 0 0.05) different from each other. The total phenolic content did not decrease to 50% of its initial value during the storage period; therefore, its half‐life could not be determined. + indicates the increase in the percentage of content, − indicates the percentage of loss.

Abbreviations: CE, Catechin Equivalent; GAE, Gallic Acid Equivalent.

The overall decline in ascorbic acid can also be related to residual enzymatic activity and trapped oxygen within packaging materials, even under carefully controlled drying and storage conditions (Lee and Kader 2000; Davey et al. 2000). Although double‐layered polyethylene packaging and double sealing were used in this study, some exposure to external environmental factors is still possible. Combined with insufficient control of light, humidity, or temperature, these conditions may have accelerated the degradation process.

Differences in degradation rates between species probably reflect variations in tissue structure, initial ascorbic acid content, and the concentration of endogenous antioxidants that can help mitigate oxidative stress (Bosch et al. 2013). The fruit of Mussaenda arcuata, having a more delicate structure, may allow faster oxygen penetration and enzymatic activity than the tougher fronds of Pteridium aquilinum or the leaves of Celosia trigyna (Kader 2002).

In particular, the highest degradation rates across all three WEPs occurred during the first four months of storage. This may be due to early‐stage redox reactions triggered by residual oxygen, moisture, and trace metals present in plant tissues, which are known to catalyze oxidative breakdown (Andersson et al. 2015). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that vitamin C degradation during storage is accelerated by various factors, including elevated temperatures, exposure to light, and biochemical reactions, particularly those involving enzymes such as ascorbate oxidase (Pham et al. 2019; Mahnot et al. 2019). These factors, alone or in combination, probably contributed to the observed decrease in ascorbic acid content over time.

The half‐life times for the degradation of ascorbic acid during storage of 12 months are listed in Table 6. The kinetics of ascorbic acid degradation followed a first‐order reaction. The reaction constants of ascorbic acid in dried and stored wild edible plants were determined by plotting the natural logarithm of the ascorbic acid concentration (mg/100 g dm) against the storage time. Depending on storage time, the rate of degradation of ascorbic acid increased. The half‐life time was calculated as 4.6 months for Mussaenda arcuata fruits, 5.0 months for Celosia trigyna leaves, and 5.4 months for Pteridium aquilinum fronds. The optimal half‐life time for better ascorbic acid retention in dried and stored wild edible plants studied was recorded as 4.6 months in Mussaenda arcuata fruits. High retention of ascorbic acid was recorded for the dried and stored fruits of Mussaenda arcuata.

3.5.2. β‐Carotene During Storage

The results of the findings showed that β‐carotene retention also declined over the storage period; however, the extent of degradation varied among the three wild edible plants. Celosia trigyna exhibited the highest stability, retaining 71.63% of its initial β‐carotene content at 4 months and 34.38% after one year. In comparison, Mussaenda arcuata retained 62.32% at 4 months, which decreased to 26.26% at the end of the storage period. Pteridium aquilinum demonstrated the lowest retention, with 54.84% at 4 months and only 21.58% after one year (Table 6). Although β‐carotene is generally more stable than ascorbic acid, it remains susceptible to degradation through oxidative and isomerization processes. The comparatively higher retention observed in Celosia trigyna may be attributed to the presence of protective phytochemicals or a favorable cellular matrix that mitigates oxidative damage, as has been reported for leafy vegetables with high antioxidant potential and cell wall integrity (Rodriguez‐Amaya et al. 2008). As a highly unsaturated lipophilic compound, β‐carotene is particularly vulnerable to oxidative breakdown and structural isomerization, especially when exposed to light, heat, oxygen, and trace metal ions (Rodriguez‐Amaya 2001).

The greatest losses occurred during the first 4 to 8 months of storage, a period likely influenced by differences in plant tissue integrity and packaging effectiveness. Even with double‐layered polyethylene sealing, residual oxygen, packaging permeability, and storage temperature can accelerate oxidation reactions, leading to the formation of inactive or less bioavailable β‐carotene derivatives (Tonucci et al. 1995). Additionally, the presence of pro‐oxidant compounds and residual enzymatic activity in plant tissues may further promote degradation over time. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that dried plant‐based foods can undergo considerable carotenoid loss unless stringent controls on oxygen, temperature, and light exposure are maintained (Nguyen and Schwartz 1998).

Importantly, even when the packaging headspace is flushed with nitrogen, dissolved residual oxygen can still drive β‐carotene degradation during long‐term storage (Vásquez‐Caicedo et al. 2007). Furthermore, the oxidative breakdown of the highly unsaturated carotenoid structure contributes further to the observed decrease in the total carotenoid and β‐carotene content (Kidmose et al. 2002).

The half‐life times for β‐carotene degradation during storage of 12 months are shown in Table 6. The kinetics of degradation of β‐carotene followed a first‐order reaction. The degradation reaction constants of β‐carotene in dried and stored wild edible plants were calculated by plotting the natural logarithm of its concentration (mg/100 g dry matter) against storage duration. Depending on storage time, the β‐carotene degradation rate increased. The half‐life time was calculated as 5.6 months for Celosia trigyna , 6.1 months for Pteridium aquilinum , and 6.8 months for Mussaenda arcuata. The optimal half‐life time for better retention of β‐carotene in dried and stored wild edible plants was recorded as 5.6 months and was recorded in leaves of Celosia trigyna .

3.5.3. Total Flavonoid Content During Storage

The study findings indicated that the total flavonoid content in the examined wild edible plants declined over time, although retention was relatively higher during the initial months of storage. Mussaenda arcuata showed a flavonoid retention of 66.55% after 4 months, which decreased substantially to 23.93% at the end of one year. Celosia trigyna retained 57.23% at 4 months and 35.95% after 12 months, making it the most stable among the three species in terms of flavonoid preservation. On the contrary, Pteridium aquilinum exhibited a retention of 65.46% at 4 months but experienced the steepest decline, falling to just 17.84% at the end of the storage period (Table 6).

This degradation is largely attributable to oxidative and enzymatic breakdown, processes to which flavonoids are increasingly susceptible over prolonged storage, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions. Although flavonoids are generally more stable than ascorbic acid or β‐carotene, they can still undergo degradation through oxidative, enzymatic, and hydrolytic pathways when exposed to oxygen, heat, moisture, and storage time (Manach et al. 2004).

Differences in retention between species probably reflect variations in tissue structure and phytochemical composition (Li et al. 2020). The relatively high retention of flavonoids in Celosia trigyna suggests the presence of a more protective tissue matrix or a higher initial concentration of stable flavonoid compounds. On the contrary, the low retention in Pteridium aquilinum (17.84%) may result from rapid degradation due to enzymatic oxidation and limited intrinsic antioxidant defenses. Mussaenda arcuata demonstrated intermediate stability, reflecting a moderate level of protection. These species‐specific differences may also be influenced by the diversity of flavonoid subclasses present (e.g., flavonols, flavones, and anthocyanins), their glycosylation patterns, and their interactions with other phytochemicals such as phenolic acids or proteins, all of which can affect their susceptibility to degradation (Panche et al. 2016).

In addition, flavonoid losses were more pronounced during the first half of the storage period, probably driven by redox reactions catalyzed by trace metals or residual enzymatic activity within the plant matrix. Despite the use of double‐sealed polyethylene packaging, factors such as residual oxygen and temperature fluctuations can further promote degradation, as observed in prior studies on dried plant products (Wachtel‐Galor 2011). These findings underscore the need for improved storage technologies, such as oxygen scavengers or modified atmosphere packaging, to better preserve flavonoid content over time.

The half‐life times for the degradation of the total flavonoid during storage of 12 months are indicated in Table 6. The kinetics of the degradation of total flavonoids followed a first‐order reaction. The rate constants for total flavonoid degradation in dried and stored wild edible plants were determined by analyzing the relationship between storage duration and the natural logarithm of total flavonoid concentration (mg CE/100 g dry matter). Depending on storage time, the total flavonoid degradation rate increased. Half‐life time was calculated as 5.6 months for Pteridium aquilinum fronds, 5.7 months for Mussaenda arcuata fruits, and 6.9 months for Celosia trigyna leaves. The optimal half‐life time for better retention of total flavonoid in dried and stored study wild edible plants was recorded as 5.6 months in Pteridium aquilinum fronds.

3.5.4. Total Phenolic Compounds During Storage

The observed trend in total phenolic compounds (TPC) in all wild edible plant (WEP) samples, marked by an initial increase during the first 8 months of storage followed by a modest decline at 12 months, can be attributed to several storage‐induced biochemical changes. The early rise in TPC is likely due to the hydrolysis of bound phenolics, where storage conditions promote the breakdown of ester and glycosidic bonds, releasing free phenolic compounds that are more readily extractable (Nicoli et al. 1999). In addition, partial depolymerization of complex high‐molecular‐weight phenolics may improve solubility and extraction efficiency (Pinelo et al. 2004). The subsequent decrease in TPC after 8 months is likely a result of oxidative degradation or polymerization of phenolic molecules into insoluble or nonextractable forms. These processes can be triggered by residual oxygen, light exposure, or enzymatic activity over time (Shahidi and Naczk 2003).

Despite the decline, final TPC retention levels of approximately 81%–82% in all species indicate a strong inherent stability of phenolic compounds in these WEPs. This is particularly notable compared to more labile nutrients, such as ascorbic acid. The high retention underscores the potential of these plants as reliable sources of dietary antioxidants even during long‐term storage. Previous studies have also shown that the phenolic content of dried wild edible plants remains relatively stable for several months, with significant degradation often occurring only after prolonged periods, typically beyond 8 months. This early stability is largely due to the drying process, which reduces the moisture content and thereby inhibits enzymatic activity (Nicoli et al. 1999; Wojdyło et al. 2007). Low water activity in dried plant tissues limits both enzymatic degradation and nonenzymatic oxidation (Vega‐Mercado et al. 2007). Furthermore, phenolic compounds may remain protected by their association with plant cell wall structures or other macromolecules, shielding them from environmental stressors such as light and oxygen (Turkmen et al. 2005). When storage conditions are carefully controlled, specifically with low humidity, minimal light exposure, and airtight packaging, phenolic degradation is further minimized (Corrêa et al. 2017).

The lack of substantial degradation before the 8‐month mark suggests the presence of a lag phase in the degradation kinetics, during which phenolics remain relatively resistant until certain oxidative or structural thresholds are reached. Similar patterns of delayed degradation have been documented in stored herbs, dried fruits, and tea leaves (Chan et al. 2009), supporting the conclusion that phenolic compounds can remain stable under optimal storage conditions over long periods.

The most favorable storage time for better bioactive compound retention for the studied wild edible plants was 4.6 months. All bioactive compounds for all the studied wild edible plants were retained with a minimum of half of their initial contents.

4. Conclusions

This study confirmed that fresh wild edible plants, Mussaenda arcuata, Celosia trigyna , and Pteridium aquilinum , are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with notable health benefits. However, the preservation of these compounds depends heavily on proper drying and storage practices. A drying temperature of 60°C was found to be optimal for maintaining key bioactive components such as ascorbic acid, beta‐carotene, total flavonoids, and total phenolics in all three species. At this temperature, a favorable balance was achieved between efficient moisture removal and minimal nutrient degradation. Drying kinetic analysis revealed that the Henderson and Pabis model best fit the drying behavior of Mussaenda arcuata and Celosia trigyna , while the two‐term model was most suitable for Pteridium aquilinum at the same temperature, highlighting their usefulness in process optimization. Among the species studied, Mussaenda arcuata showed the highest drying rates and effective diffusivity, making it more suitable for commercial‐scale drying where throughput and energy efficiency are priorities. Storage trials demonstrated good retention of ascorbic acid, a sensitive marker of nutritional stability, with a half‐life of approximately 4.6 to 6 months, suggesting the potential for extended preservation of nutritional quality. Drying time was also found to vary depending on species, temperature, and slice thickness, with thinner slices drying faster but requiring careful monitoring to prevent nutrient loss. To maintain product stability and ensure longer shelf life, the use of appropriate polyethylene packaging is recommended, as it effectively limits exposure to moisture and oxygen.

5. Recommendations

It is recommended to provide targeted training to local farmers and food processors on optimal drying and storage techniques to improve the quality and consistency of dried wild edible plants. The use of airtight containers and storage in cool, shaded environments should be promoted to preserve nutritional value. Encouraging the consumption of these nutrient‐rich foods among vulnerable groups, particularly children and pregnant women, can help address micronutrient and bioactive compound deficiencies in rural areas. Furthermore, supporting small‐scale food enterprises, especially women's groups and cooperatives, in the processing, packaging, and marketing of dried wild edible plants can improve rural incomes, reduce postharvest losses, and improve food and health security. Integrating traditional knowledge with scientific methods will further improve product quality and marketability, fostering sustainable and resilient food systems. Government bodies and policymakers are encouraged to support and empower communities through enabling policies, infrastructure development, and capacity‐building programs.

Author Contributions

Tamene Daba Rumicha: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), software (equal), validation (equal), writing – original draft (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Sirawdink Fikreyesus Forsido: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal), writing – original draft (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Yetenayet Bekele Tola: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal), visualization (equal), writing – original draft (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Abebe Yimer: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), methodology (equal), software (equal), supervision (equal), writing – original draft (equal). Chala G. Kuyu: conceptualization (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (equal). Tilahun A. Teka: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), methodology (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal). Addisalem Hailu: conceptualization (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), supervision (equal), validation (equal), writing – original draft (equal). Frafis Hirko: formal analysis (equal), writing – original draft (equal).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Jimma and Wollega University for financial support.

Rumicha, T. D. , Hirko F., Forsido S. F., et al. 2025. “Drying Temperature and Storage Duration for the Retention of Bioactive Compounds of Selected Wild Edible Plants From Ethiopia.” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 8: e70782. 10.1002/fsn3.70782.

Funding: This work was supported by College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University (2023) and Wollega University (2022).

Data Availability Statement

Data sets to support this are available upon reasonable request from the author.

References

  1. Agrawal, Y. C. , and Singh R. P.. 1977. Thin‐layer drying studies on short‐grain rough rice. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbari, A. 2016. “An Overview of the Characteristics and Function of Ascorbic acid in Various Tissues: Relying on Its Antioxidant Function.” 10.17795/zjrms-4037. [DOI]
  3. Akpinar, E. K. , and Bicer Y.. 2005. “Modeling of the Drying of Eggplants in Thin Layers.” International Journal of Food Science & Technology 40: 273–281. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00886.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akpinar, E. K. , Bicer Y., and Yildiz C.. 2003. “Thin Layer Drying of Red Pepper.” Journal of Food Engineering 59: 99–104. 10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00425-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersson, S. C. , Ekholm A., Johansson E., et al. 2015. “Effect of Storage Time and Temperature on the Stability of Bioactive Compounds in Aseptically Packed Beverages Prepared From Rose Hips and Sea Buckthorn Berries.” Agricultural and Food Science 24: 273–288. 10.23986/afsci.49331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. AOAC . 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists International. [Google Scholar]
  7. Araya‐Farias, M. , and Ratti C.. 2008. “Dehydration of Foods: General Concepts.” In Advances in Food Dehydration. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Awuchi, C. G. , Twinomuhwezi H., Igwe V. S., and Amagwula I. O.. 2020. “Food Additives and Food Preservatives for Domestic and Industrial Food Applications.” Journal of Animal Health 2: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayensu, A. 1997. “Dehydration of Food Crops Using a Solar Dryer With Convective Heat Flow.” Solar Energy 59: 121–126. 10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00130-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bąkowska, A. , Kucharska A. Z., and Oszmiański J.. 2003. “The Effects of Heating, UV Irradiation, and Storage on the Stability of the Anthocyanin–Polyphenol Pigment Complex.” Food Chemistry 81: 349–355. 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00429-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bengston, G. , Rahman M., Stanley R., and Perera C.. 1998. Effect‐Specific Pretreatment on the Drying Behavior of Apple Rings. New Zeland Inst. of Food Science and New Zeland Conference, Nelson, 10s.
  12. Bosch, V. , Cilla A., García‐Llatas G., Gilabert V., Boix R., and Alegría A.. 2013. “Kinetics of Ascorbic Acid Degradation in Fruit‐Based Infant Foods During Storage.” Journal of Food Engineering 116: 298–303. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruce, D. M. 1985. “Exposed‐Layer Barley Drying: Three Models Fitted to New Data up to 150 C.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 32: 337–348. 10.1016/0021-8634(85)90098-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Casta Eda‐Ovando, A. , Pacheco‐Hern Ndez M. D. L., Ez‐Hern Ndez P., Rodr Guez J. A., and Gal N‐Vidal C. a. S.. 2009. “Chemical Studies of Anthocyanins: A Review.” Food Chemistry 113: 859–871. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chan, E. W. C. , Lim Y. Y., and Omar M.. 2007. “Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Leaves of Etlingera Species (Zingiberaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia.” Food Chemistry 104: 1586–1593. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chan, E. W. C. , Lim Y. Y., Wong S. K., et al. 2009. “Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Antioxidant Properties of Leaves and Tea of Ginger Species.” Food Chemistry 113, no. 1: 166–172. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, B. , and Huang J.. 1998. “Degradation and Isomerization of Chlorophyll a and β‐Carotene as Affected by Various Heating and Illumination Treatments.” Food Chemistry 62: 299–307. 10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00201-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chhinnan, M. S. 1984. “Evaluation of Selected Mathematical Models for Describing Thin‐Layer Drying of In‐Shell Pecans.” Transactions of ASAE 27: 610–615. [Google Scholar]
  19. Clemente, D. , Ortega M. C., Arenzana F. J., and De Castro F.. 2011. “FGF‐2 and Anosmin‐1 Are Selectively Expressed in Different Types of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions.” Journal of Neuroscience 31: 14899–14909. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Corrêa, R. C. , Haminiuk C. W., Barros L., et al. 2017. “Stability and Biological Activity of Merlot (Vitis vinifera) Grape Pomace Phytochemicals After Simulated in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion and Colonic Fermentation.” Journal of Functional Foods 36: 410–417. 10.1016/j.jff.2017.07.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Crank, J. , and Gupta R. S.. 1975. “Isotherm Migration Method in Two Dimensions.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 18: 1101–1107. 10.1016/0017-9310(75)90228-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dai, J. , and Mumper R. J.. 2010. “Plant Phenolics: Extraction, Analysis and Their Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties.” Molecules 15, no. 10: 7313–7352. 10.3390/molecules15107313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Davey, M. W. , Montagu M. V., Inze D., et al. 2000. “Plant L‐Ascorbic Acid: Chemistry, Function, Metabolism, Bioavailability and Effects of Processing.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80: 825–860. 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00133-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Debenedictis, J. N. , De Kok T. M., and Van Breda S. G.. 2023. “Impact of Processing Method and Storage Time on Phytochemical Concentrations in an Antioxidant‐Rich Food Mixture.” Antioxidants 12: 1252. 10.3390/antiox12061252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Deng, G. F. , Lin X., Xu X. R., Gao L. L., Xie J. F., and Li H. B.. 2013. “Antioxidant Capacities and Total Phenolic Contents of 56 Vegetables.” Journal of Functional Foods 5: 260–266. 10.1016/j.jff.2012.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dewanto, V. , Wu X., Adom K. K., and Liu R. H.. 2002. “Thermal Processing Enhances the Nutritional Value of Tomatoes by Increasing Total Antioxidant Activity.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, no. 10: 3010–3014. 10.1021/jf0115589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Doymaz, I. 2004. “Convective Air Drying Characteristics of Thin Layer Carrots.” Journal of Food Engineering 61: 359–364. 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00142-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Doymaz, I. 2007. “Air‐Drying Characteristics of Tomatoes.” Journal of Food Engineering 78, no. 4: 1291–1297. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Doymaz, I. 2010. “Effect of Citric Acid and Blanching Pre‐Treatments on Drying and Rehydration of Amasya Red Apples.” Food and Bioproducts Processing 88: 124–132. 10.1016/j.fbp.2009.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Eldeen, Y. , Biaisdell J., and Hamdy M.. 1980. “A Model for Ear Corn Drying.” Transactions of ASAE 23: 1261–1271. 10.13031/2013.34757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Elgamal, R. , Song C., Rayan A. M., Liu C., Al‐Rejaie S., and Elmasry G.. 2023. “Thermal Degradation of Bioactive Compounds During the Drying Process of Horticultural and Agronomic Products: A Comprehensive Overview.” Agronomy 13, no. 1580. 10.3390/agronomy13061580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ertekin, C. , and Yaldiz O.. 2004. “Drying of Eggplant and Selection of a Suitable Thin Layer Drying Model.” Journal of Food Engineering 63: 349–359. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ertekin, O. , and Yaldiz C.. 2001. “Thin Layer Solar Drying of Some Different Vegetables.” Drying Technology 19: 583–596. 10.1081/DRT-100103936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. FAO . 2019. The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. FAO. [Google Scholar]
  35. Faustino, J. , Barroca M. J., and Guiné R.. 2007. “Study of the Drying Kinetics of Green Bell Pepper and Chemical Characterization.” Food and Bioproducts Processing 85: 163–170. 10.1205/fbp07009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ganesan, K. , Quiles J. L., Daglia M., Xiao J., and Xu B.. 2021. “Dietary Phytochemicals Modulate Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction and Autoimmune Diseases.” Food Frontiers 2: 357–382. 10.1002/fft2.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Giannakourou, M. C. , and Taoukis P. S.. 2021. “Effect of Alternative Preservation Steps and Storage on Vitamin C Stability in Fruit and Vegetable Products: Critical Review and Kinetic Modelling Approaches.” Food 10: 2630. 10.3390/foods10112630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Goyal, R. K. , O M., and Bhargava V. K.. 2008. “Mathematical Modeling of Thin Layer Drying Kinetics of Apple in a Tunnel Dryer.” International Journal of Food Engineering 4: 1233. 10.2202/1556-3758.1233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Guaadaoui, A. , Benaicha S., Elmajdoub N., Bellaoui M., and Hamal A.. 2014. “What Is a Bioactive Compound? A Combined Definition for a Preliminary Consensus.” International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences 3: 174–179. [Google Scholar]
  40. Guiné, R. 2018. “The Drying of Foods and Its Effect on the Physical‐Chemical, Sensorial and Nutritional Properties.” International Journal of Food Engineering 2: 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gunhan, T. , Demir V., Hancioglu E., and Hepbasli A.. 2005. “Mathematical Modeling of Drying of Bay Leaves.” Energy Conversion and Management 46: 1667–1679. 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hacısevki, A. 2009. “An Overview of Ascorbic Acid Biochemistry.” Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University 38: 233–255. 10.1501/Eczfak_0000000528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Henderson, S. 1974. “Progress in Developing the Thin Layer Drying Equation.” Transactions of ASAE 17: 1167–1168. 10.13031/2013.37052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Howard, L. R. , Pandjaitan N., Morelock T., and Gil M. I.. 1999. “Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Spinach as Affected by Genetics and Maturation.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, no. 3: 589–596. 10.1021/jf010893b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hummeida, M. , and El‐Sheikh A.. 1989. Determination of Drying Curves of Two Varieties of Peanuts.
  46. Jiru, N. A. , Fekadu Gemede H., and Keyata E. O.. 2023. “Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Selected Underutilized Wild Edible Fruits in East Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia.” International Journal of Fruit Science 23: 34–45. 10.1080/15538362.2023.2166649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Juániz, I. , Ludwig I. A., Huarte E., et al. 2016. “Influence of Heat Treatment on Antioxidant Capacity and (Poly) Phenolic Compounds of Selected Vegetables.” Food Chemistry 197: 466–473. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kader, A. A. 2002. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. Vol. 3311. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kähkönen, M. P. , Hopia A. I., Vuorela H. J., et al. 1999. “Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Containing Phenolic Compounds.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47, no. 10: 3954–3962. 10.1021/jf990146l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Khan, H. , Ullah H., Tundis R., et al. 2020. “Dietary Flavonoids in the Management of Huntington's Disease: Mechanism and Clinical Perspective.” eFood 1: 38–52. 10.2991/efood.k.200203.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kidmose, U. , Edelenbos M., Nørbæk R., and Christensen L. P.. 2002. “Colour Stability in Vegetables.” 10.1533/9781855736672.2.179. [DOI]
  52. Klimczak, I. , Małecka M., Szlachta M., and Gliszczyńska‐Świgło A.. 2007. “Effect of Storage on the Content of Polyphenols, Vitamin C, and the Antioxidant Activity of Orange Juices.” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20: 313–322. 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kris‐Etherton, P. M. , Hecker K. D., Bonanome A., et al. 2002. “Bioactive Compounds in Foods: Their Role in the Preventing Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer.” American Journal of Medicine 113: 71–88. 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00995-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Krokida, M. K. , Maroulis Z. B., and Saravacos G. D.. 2001. “The Effect of the Method of Drying on the Colour of Dehydrated Products.” International Journal of Food Science & Technology 36: 53–59. 10.1046/j.1365-2621.2001.00426.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kumar, S. , Sharma R., and Thakur N.. 2021. “Thermal Degradation Kinetics of Vitamin C in Vegetables: A Review.” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 45, no. 5: 154–166. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kwinana‐Mandindi, T. 2015. “Phytochemical and Antioxidant Composition of Selected Local Wild Plants in South Africa: Consideration of Alternative Nutrients for Health Promotion.” 5th Intern Conference on Biomed Eng Tech 2015: 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  57. Laguerre, M. , Lecomte J., and Villeneuve P.. 2007. “Evaluation of the Ability of Antioxidants to Counteract Lipid Oxidation: Existing Methods, New Trends, and Challenges.” Progress in Lipid Research 46: 244–282. 10.1016/j.plipres.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Läubli, M. W. , and Bruttel P. A.. 1986. “Determination of the Oxidative Stability of Fats and Oils: Comparison Between the Active Oxygen Method (AOCS cd 12‐57) and the Rancimat Method.” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 63, no. 6: 792–795. 10.1007/BF02541966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee, S. K. , and Kader A. A.. 2000. “Preharvest and Postharvest Factors Influencing Vitamin C Content of Horticultural Crops.” Postharvest Biology and Technology 20: 207–220. 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00133-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li, H. , Li D., Yang Z., Zeng Q., Luo Y., and He N.. 2020. “Flavones Produced by Mulberry Flavone Synthase Type I Constitute a Defense Line Against the Ultraviolet‐B Stress.” Plants 9, no. 2: 215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lin, S. , Zhang H., Simal‐Gandara J., et al. 2022. “Investigation of New Products of Quercetin Formed in Boiling Water via UPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS‐MS Analysis.” Food Chemistry 386: 132747. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu, Q. , and Bakker‐Arkema F.. 1997. “Stochastic Modeling of Grain Drying: Part 2. Model Development.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66: 275–280. 10.1006/jaer.1996.0145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu, R. H. 2004. “Potential Synergy of Phytochemicals in Cancer Prevention: Mechanism of Action.” Journal of Nutrition 134: 3479S–3485S. 10.1093/jn/134.12.3479S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu, R. H. , Liu J., and Chen B.. 2005. “Apples Prevent Mammary Tumors in Rats.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 2341–2343. 10.1021/jf058010c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Madamba, P. S. , Driscoll R. H., and Buckle K. A.. 1996. “The Thin‐Layer Drying Characteristics of Garlic Slices.” Journal of Food Engineering 29: 75–97. 10.1016/0260-8774(95)00062-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mahnot, N. K. , Mahanta C. L., Farkas B. E., Keener K. M., and Misra N.. 2019. “Atmospheric Cold Plasma Inactivation of Escherichia Coli and Listeria monocytogenes in Tender Coconut Water: Inoculation and Accelerated Shelf‐Life Studies.” Food Control 106: 106678. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Manach, C. , Scalbert A., Morand C., Rémésy C., and Jiménez L.. 2004. “Polyphenols: Food Sources and Bioavailability.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79, no. 5: 727–747. 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mayor, L. , and Sereno A. M.. 2004. “Modelling Shrinkage During Convective Drying of Food Materials: A Review.” Journal of Food Engineering 61, no. 3: 373–386. 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00144-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mbondo, N. N. , Owino W. O., Ambuko J., and Sila D. N.. 2018. “Effect of Drying Methods on the Retention of Bioactive Compounds in African Eggplant.” Food Science & Nutrition 6, no. 4: 814–823. 10.1002/fsn3.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mehmood, A. , and Zeb A.. 2023. “Effects of Different Cooking Techniques on the Carotenoids Composition, Phenolic Contents, and Antioxidant Activity of Spinach Leaves.” Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 17, no. 5: 4760–4774. 10.1007/s11694-023-01962-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Menges, H. O. , and Ertekin C.. 2006. “Mathematical Modeling of Thin Layer Drying of Golden Apples.” Journal of Food Engineering 77: 119–125. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Michalska, A. , Wojdyło A., Lech K., Łysiak G. P., and Figiel A.. 2018. “Effect of Different Drying Techniques on the Bioactive Compounds, Sensory Attributes and Microstructure of Cranberry Powders.” Food Chemistry 240: 1013–1021. [Google Scholar]
  73. Midilli, A. , Kucuk H., and Yapar Z.. 2002. “A New Model for Single‐Layer Drying.” Drying Technology 20: 1503–1513. 10.1081/DRT-120005864. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Mohd Zainol, M. , Abdul‐Hamid A., Abu Bakar F., and Pak Dek S.. 2009. “Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Degradation of Selected Flavonoids in Centella asiatica .” International Food Research Journal 16: 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  75. Muliterno, M. M. , Rodrigues D., De Lima F. S., Ida E. I., and Kurozawa L. E.. 2017. “Conversion/Degradation of Isoflavones and Color Alterations During the Drying of Okara.” LWT 75: 512–519. 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.09.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Muzolf‐Panek, M. , Kleiber T., and Kaczmarek A.. 2017. “Effect of Increasing Manganese Concentration in Nutrient Solution on the Antioxidant Activity, Ascorbic acid, Lycopene, and Polyphenol Contents of Tomato Fruit.” Food Additives & Contaminants, Part A 34: 379–389. 10.1080/19440049.2016.1277037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Naczk, M. , and Shahidi F.. 2006. “Phenolics in Cereals, Fruits and Vegetables: Occurrence, Extraction and Analysis.” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 41, no. 5: 1523–1542. 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nellist, M. 1987. “Modeling the Performance of a Cross‐Flow Grain Drier.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 37: 43–57. 10.1016/0021-8634(87)90130-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nguyen, M. L. , and Schwartz S. J.. 1998. “Lycopene Stability During Food Processing.” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 218, no. 2: 101–105. 10.3181/00379727-218-44274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Nicoli, M. C. , Anese M., and Parpinel M.. 1999. “Influence of Processing on the Antioxidant Properties of Fruit and Vegetables.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 10, no. 3: 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  81. Norhadi, N. , Akhir A. M., Rosli N. R., and Mulana F.. 2020. “Drying Kinetics of Mango Fruit Using a Tray and Oven Dryer.” Malaysian Journal of Chemical Engineering & Technology 3: 51–59. 10.24191/mjcet.v3i2.10965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Onwude, D. I. , Hashim N., Janius R. B., Nawi N. M., and Abdan K.. 2016. “Modeling the Thin‐Layer Drying of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review.” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 15, no. 3: 599–618. 10.1111/1541-4337.12196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pal, U. , and Chakraverty A.. 1997. “Thin Layer Convection‐Drying of Mushrooms.” Energy Conversion and Management 38: 107–113. 10.1016/0196-8904(96)00020-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Panche, A. N. , Diwan A. D., and Chandra S. R.. 2016. “Flavonoids: An Overview.” Journal of Nutritional Science 5: e47. 10.1017/jns.2016.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Pandey, K. B. , and Rizvi S. I.. 2009. “Plant Polyphenols as Dietary Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2: 270–278. 10.4161/oxim.2.5.9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Patras, A. , Brunton N. P., O'Donnell C., and Tiwari B. K.. 2010. “Effect of Thermal Processing on Anthocyanin Stability in Foods; Mechanisms and Kinetics of Degradation.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 21, no. 1: 3–11. 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Pénicaud, C. , Achir N., Dhuique‐Mayer C., Dornier M., and Bohuon P.. 2011. “Degradation of β‐Carotene During Fruit and Vegetable Processing or Storage: Reaction Mechanisms and Kinetic Aspects: A Review.” Fruits 66: 417–440. 10.1051/fruits/2011058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Pérez‐Gálvez, A. , and Mínguez‐Mosquera M. I.. 2001. “Structure− Reactivity Relationship in the Oxidation of Carotenoid Pigments of the Pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.).” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49: 4864–4869. 10.1021/jf010547c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Pham, H. T. , Bazmawe M., Kebede B., Buvé C., Hendrickx M. E., and Van Loey A. M.. 2019. “Changes in the Soluble and Insoluble Compounds of Shelf‐Stable Orange Juice About Non‐Enzymatic Browning During Storage.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67: 12854–12862. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Pinelo, M. , Rubilar M., Jerez M., Sineiro J., and Núñez M. J.. 2004. “Effect of Solvent, Temperature, and Solvent‐To‐Solid Ratio on the Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Extracts From Different Components of Grape Pomace.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, no. 6: 2111–2117. 10.1021/jf0488110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rahman, M. M. , Khan M. M. R., and Hosain M. M.. 2007. “Analysis of Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) Contents in Various Fruits and Vegetables by UV‐Spectrophotometry.” Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 42: 417–424. 10.3329/bjsir.v42i4.749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rahman, M. S. , Perera C. O., and Thebaud C.. 1997. “Desorption Isotherm and Heat Pump Drying Kinetics of Peas.” Food Research International 30: 485–491. 10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00009-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Rodriguez‐Amaya, D. B. 1997. Carotenoids and Food Preparation: The Retention of Provitamin A Carotenoids in Prepared, Processed, and Stored Foods. John Snow, Inc./MOST Project. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rodriguez‐Amaya, D. B. 2001. A Guide to Carotenoid Analysis in Foods. ILSI Press. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rodriguez‐Amaya, D. B. , Kimura M., Godoy H. T., and Amaya‐Farfan J.. 2008. “Updated Brazilian Database on Food Carotenoids: Factors Affecting Carotenoid Composition.” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21, no. 6: 445–463. 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Rossi, M. , Giussani E., Morelli R., Scalzo R. L., Nani R. C., and Torreggiani D.. 2003. “Effect of Fruit Blanching on Phenolics and Radical Scavenging Activity of Highbush Blueberry Juice.” Food Research International 36, no. 9–10: 999–1005. 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00023-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rumicha, T. D. , Belew S., Hasen G., Teka T. A., and Forsido S. F.. 2025. “Food, Feed, and Phytochemical Uses of Wild Edible Plants: A Systematic Review.” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 6: e70454. 10.1002/fsn3.70454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rumicha, T. D. , Forsido S. F., Tola Y. B., et al. 2025. “Nutritional, Anti‐Nutritional and Mineral Contents of Selected Wild Edible Plants in Ethiopia: Mussaenda Arcuata, Celosia Trigyna, and Pteridium aquilinum .” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 7: e70530. 10.1002/fsn3.70530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Sadler, G. , Davis J., and Dezman D.. 1990. “Rapid Extraction of Lycopene and β‐Carotene From Reconstituted Tomato Paste and Pink Grapefruit Homogenates.” Journal of Food Science 55: 1460–1461. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb03958.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sahari, M. A. , Mohammadi A., and Hamidi Z.. 2004. “Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Vitamin C Content and Color of Iranian Kiwifruit.” Food Chemistry 89, no. 4: 601–605. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Santos, P. , and Silva M.. 2008. “Retention of Ascorbic Acid in Drying Processes of Fruits and Vegetables–A Review.” Drying Technology 26: 1421–1437. 10.1080/07373930802458911. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Sarsavadia, P. , Sawhney R., Pangavhane D., and Singh S.. 1999. “Drying Behavior of Brined Onion Slices.” Journal of Food Engineering 40: 219–226. 10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00058-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Schieber, A. , Keller P., and Carle R.. 2001. “Determination of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids of Apple and Pear by High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography.” Journal of Chromatography A 910: 265–273. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01217-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Shahidi, F. , and Naczk M.. 2003. Phenolics in Food and Nutraceuticals. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  105. Snyder, L. R. , Kirkland J. J., and Dolan J. W.. 2011. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tanvir, E. , Hossen M. S., Hossain M. F., et al. 2017. “Antioxidant Properties of Popular Turmeric ( Curcuma longa ) Varieties From Bangladesh.” Journal of Food Quality 2017: 1–8. 10.1155/2017/8471785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. Teng, H. , Deng H., He Y., Lv Q., and Chen L.. 2021. “The Role of Dietary Flavonoids for Modulation of ATP Binding Cassette Transporter‐Mediated Multidrug Resistance.” eFood 2: 234–246. 10.53365/efood.k/144604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tiris, C. , Ozbalta N., Tiris M., and Dincer I.. 1994. “Experimental Testing of a New Solar Dryer.” International Journal of Energy Research 18: 483–491. 10.1002/er.4440180407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Tonucci, L. H. , Holden J. M., Beecher G. R., Khachik F., Davis C. S., and Mulokozi G.. 1995. “Carotenoid Content of Thermally Processed Tomato‐Based Food Products.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43, no. 3: 579–586. 10.1021/jf00051a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Tsehay, E. G. , Emire S. A., Admassu H., and Gebeyehu T. A.. 2023. “Nutritional Composition and Phytochemical Content of Wild Edible Tuber (Amorphophallus abyssinicus) Crop.” International Journal of Food Properties 26: 974–990. 10.1080/10942912.2023.2197176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Turkmen, N. , Sari F., and Velioglu Y. S.. 2005. “The Effect of Cooking Methods on Total Phenolics and Antioxidant Activity of Selected Green Vegetables.” Food Chemistry 93, no. 4: 713–718. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Van den Berg, H. , Faulks R., Granado H. F., et al. 2000. “The Potential for the Improvement of Carotenoid Levels in Foods and the Likely Systemic Effects.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80, no. 7: 880–912. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<880::AID-JSFA646>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Van Holde, K. E. , Johnson W. C., and Ho P. S.. 2006. Principles of Physical Biochemistry.
  114. Vásquez‐Caicedo, A. L. , Schilling S., Carle R., and Neidhart S.. 2007. “Impact of Packaging and Storage Conditions on Color and β‐Carotene Retention of Pasteurized Mango Purée.” European Food Research and Technology 224: 581–590. 10.1007/S00217-006-0339-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Vega‐Mercado, H. , Gongora‐Nieto M. M., Barbosa‐Canovas G. V., and Swanson B. G.. 2007. “Pulsed Electric Fields in Food Preservation.” In Handbook of Food Preservation, 801–832. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  116. Verma, L. R. , Bucklin R., Endan J., and Wratten F.. 1985. “Effects of Drying Air Parameters on Rice Drying Models.” Transactions of ASAE 28: 296–301. [Google Scholar]
  117. Vidinamo, F. , Fawzia S., and Karim M.. 2021. “Effect of Drying Methods and Storage With Agro‐Ecological Conditions on Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activity of Fruits: A Review.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 62: 353–361. 10.1080/10408398.2020.1816891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wachtel‐Galor, S. 2011. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. CRC Press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wojdyło, A. , Figiel A., and OszmiańSki J.. 2009. “Effect of Drying Methods With the Application of Vacuum Microwaves on the Bioactive Compounds, Color, and Antioxidant Activity of Strawberry Fruits.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 1337–1343. 10.1021/jf802507j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wojdyło, A. , Oszmiański J., and Czemerys R.. 2007. “Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Compounds in 32 Selected Herbs.” Food Chemistry 105, no. 3: 940–949. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wong, S. P. , Leong L. P., and Koh J. H. W.. 2006. “Antioxidant Activities of Aqueous Extracts of Selected Plants.” Food Chemistry 99: 775–783. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  122. Xu, B. , and Chang S. K.. 2008. “Total Phenolics, Phenolic Acids, Isoflavones, and Anthocyanins and Antioxidant Properties of Yellow and Black Soybeans as Affected by Thermal Processing.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56: 7165–7175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Yagcıoglu, A. 1999. Drying Technique of Agricultural Products. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Publications. [Google Scholar]
  124. Yaldiz, O. , Ertekin C., and Uzun H. I.. 2001. “Mathematical Modeling of Thin Layer Solar Drying of Sultana Grapes.” Energy 26: 457–465. 10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00018-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Yao, Y. , and Ren G.. 2011. “Effect of thermal treatment on phenolic composition and antioxidant activities of two celery cultivars.” LWT‐Food Science and Technology 44: 181–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Yimer, A. , Forsido S. F., Addis G., and Ayelign A.. 2023. “Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Some Wild Edible Plants Consumed in Southwest Ethiopia.” Heliyon 9: e15331. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Yuan, G. F. , Sun B., Yuan J., and Wang Q. M.. 2009. “Effects of Different Cooking Methods on Health‐Promoting Compounds of Broccoli.” Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 10, no. 8: 580–588. 10.1631/jzus.B0920051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Zhang, H. , and Tsao R.. 2016. “Dietary Polyphenols, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant and Anti‐Inflammatory Effects.” Current Opinion in Food Science 8: 3–42. 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhao, C. , Wan X., Zhou S., and Cao H.. 2020. “Natural Polyphenols: A Potential Therapeutic Approach to Hypoglycemia.” eFood 1: 107–118. 10.2991/efood.k.200302.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sets to support this are available upon reasonable request from the author.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES