Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct;79(20):13150–13165. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.20.13150-13165.2005

TABLE 2.

Frequency of FISH-positive cells in raft cultures harboring wild-type or E4 mutant HPV16 genomes

Genome Presence of extrachromo- somal viral DNAa No. of rafts with FISH- positive cells/ all rafts testedf Frequency of FISH- positive cellsb,e Relative frequency of FISH-positive cellsc,e
WT Y 13/14 0.38 ± 0.44 1
16st10 N (4)/6 0.05 ± 0.05d* 0.05d*
16st15 Y 10/16 0.21 ± 0.34 0.6
16st20 Y 10/10 5.54 ± 4.4* 14*
16st32 Y 5/6 0.62 ± 0.79 1.6
16st67 Y 1/8 <0.01* <0.01*
16st84 Y 2/8 0.18 ± 0.47* 0.5*
PSS/WT N 0/3 0* 0*
PSS/20 N 0/3 0* 0*
a

Y, extrachromosomal viral DNA was detected; N, extrachromosomal DNA was not detected (see Fig. 2).

b

The percentage of FISH-positive cells in total number of cells was scored for multiple independently generated rafts harboring the wild-type or E4 mutant HPV16 genomes, as described in Materials and Methods. Raft cultures that do not contain FISH-positive cells were included in the calculation.

c

The average frequency of FISH-positive cells for wild-type HPV16 populations was set at 1.

d

Frequency of cells containing small punctate signal (see Fig. 6 and Results).

e

Asterisks indicate values for E4 mutant HPV16 genomes that were statistically significant from that of the wild-type HPV16 genome, based on the two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test.

f

Value in parentheses reflects the number of rafts containing punctate small signal (see arrows in Fig. 6G).