ABSTRACT
The biosynthetic production of energy‐dense petrochemical substitutes is an important goal to address sustainability. The diazotrophic soil microbe Azotobacter vinelandii is a model microbe for the study of biological nitrogen fixation. In addition to capturing atmospheric nitrogen and converting it into usable nitrogen compounds, it is also regarded for the ability to accumulate the bioplastic poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate and the extracellular polysaccharide alginate. Here, we demonstrate the potential to broaden the chemical products repertoire of A. vinelandii by demonstrating the accumulation of several classes of biological lipids and waxes. These products include the expanded accumulation of wax esters and fatty alcohols through heterologous expression of foreign genes and pathways, and increased production of the native lipid alkylresorcinol, accomplished by deregulating specific internal pathways and removing competitive pathways for alternative products. As a result, we demonstrate a sevenfold increase in the accumulation of alkylresorcinol, manifesting as intracellular inclusions that are easily extracted with simple solvents and account for nearly 20% of the cellular biomass. By selecting a diazotrophic microbe as a chassis for lipid accumulation, we produced these lipids without any requirement for industrial nitrogen sources in the growth medium, resulting in a net positive nitrogen process as well.
Keywords: Azotobacter vinelandii, fatty alcohols, neutral lipids, resorcinol, wax esters
Strains of the nitrogen‐fixing microbe Azotobacter vinelandii were restructured to remove competing metabolites, resulting in the hyper accumulation of the native lipid alkylresorcinol, visible as large inclusions within the cell.

1. Introduction
The microbial production of petroleum alternatives through biosynthetic routes represents an important pillar to meet the energy and industrial needs of a growing and sustainable society. Many of the current biofuels markets, such as bioethanol from corn (Pereira et al. 2019), biodiesel from plant oilseeds (Hill et al. 2006), algal biofuels (Pienkos and Darzins 2009), or methane production from anaerobic digestion, may contribute to circular carbon markets, but still require high inputs of nitrogen derived from industrial processes, such as Haber Bosch (Erisman et al. 2008; Smil 1999). These industrial processes require a significant expenditure of energy to fix atmospheric nitrogen to grow or maintain the initial biomass sources. Additionally, many industrial fermentations and alternative biosynthetic routes utilize common bacterial and yeast strains that also require a nitrogen input to grow their biomass (Steen et al. 2010; Stöveken and Steinbüchel 2008).
The soil microbe Azotobacter vinelandii has a long history of research interest as a model microbial system for the study of biological nitrogen fixation (Barney 2024; Jensen 1954; Noar and Bruno‐Bárcena 2018). Among nitrogen‐fixing microbes (diazotrophs), it has some novelty related to its ability to fix nitrogen during aerobic growth, even though the nitrogenase enzyme responsible for fixing nitrogen is extremely sensitive to oxygen, which destroys the complex metal cofactors involved in catalysis (Burén et al. 2020). A. vinelandii has been studied for more than 120 years in relation to nitrogen fixation (Barney 2024; Barney et al. 2006), accumulation of the bioplastic poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate (PHB) (García et al. 2014), production of the extracellular carbohydrate alginate (Sabra et al. 2000; Peña et al. 2002), production of metal‐mining siderophores (Fekete et al. 1983; Villa et al. 2014), resistance to desiccation through the formation of cysts (Stevenson and Socolofsky 1966; Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003), and potential to function in aquaculture and agricultural settings as a biofertilizer (Ortiz‐Marquez et al. 2012; Barney, Eberhart, et al. 2015), among its many other interesting features. In contrast, it is not generally regarded for its potential to serve as a chassis for biofuel production.
Many bacteria accumulate PHB as a form of carbon and energy storage during growth on a supply of unbalanced nutrients (excess carbon in comparison to nitrogen or other limiting nutrients, Wältermann et al. 2005). The accumulation of neutral lipids is less prominent in bacteria, and is generally associated with higher land plants, animals, and microalgae. However, certain bacteria, including Acinetobacter, Rhodococcus, and Marinobacter, are known to accumulate triacylglycerides, wax esters or a combination of both (Wältermann et al. 2005, 2007; Barney et al. 2012). A. vinelandii does not produce triacylglycerides or wax esters, but does accumulate small quantities of an alternative biological wax called alkylresorcinol as a component of the membranes during cyst formation (Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003; Funa et al. 2006). Alkylresorcinols (resorcinolic lipids) are natural waxes that are energy‐rich hydrocarbons that replace native membrane lipids during the transition of cells to the dormant cyst state. In addition to A. vinelandii, they are also found in many higher land plants, where they have been proposed to protect the plants from certain pathogenic fungi, and may play a role in animal health as well (Zabolotneva et al. 2022). These energy‐rich hydrocarbons are easily extracted from dry cell mass using simple solvents and can be further processed or cracked using petrochemical processes to produce a range of fuels and oils.
In this study, we evaluated the potential to produce wax esters and fatty alcohols using nonnative enzymes in A. vinelandii as a biological chassis. Importantly, lipids were produced using a simple medium of sucrose devoid of any reduced nitrogen compounds, and obtained all of the nitrogen required for growth through biological nitrogen fixation, making the process nitrogen negative. In the process of strain optimization, we were also able to substantially increase the levels of the native lipid alkylresorcinol to levels almost sevenfold higher than what was obtained from the parent DJ (laboratory wild‐type) strain, resulting in the accumulation of these lipids in the cytoplasm as intracellular inclusions that were easily extractable.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
A. vinelandii strain DJ (ATCC BAA‐1303) was kindly provided by Dennis Dean. Acinetobacter baylyi (ATCC 33305) and Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8 (ATCC 700491) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Escherichia coli JM109 was obtained from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). Silica gel (60 Å), dichloromethane, n‐hexane, diisopropyl ether, acetic acid, and tetrahydrofuran were american chemical society grade or better and purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents used in this study were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) or Sigma‐Aldrich Chemical Company.
2.2. Culture Growth
A. vinelandii was grown in Burk's medium at 26°C on a shaker table at 180 rpm (Dos Santos 2011; Plunkett et al. 2020).
2.3. Strain Construction
All strains were constructed following methods that have been described elsewhere (Dos Santos 2011; Dietz et al. 2024; Eberhart et al. 2016). For methods that used counterselection and SacB toxicity, strains containing the sacB gene were first grown on Burk's medium with glucose substituted for sucrose. A list of strains and genotypes used in this study is provided in Table 1. A list of plasmids and their characteristics is provided in Table 2, and the primers used to clone genes and move them into these plasmids are provided in Table 3.
Table 1.
Mutant strains constructed and/or used in this study.
| Azotobacter vinelandii strain | Plasmid utilized | Genetic features | Parent strain/reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DJ | None | Wild‐type | |
| AZBB072 | ΔpyrF | Eberhart et al. (2016) | |
| AZBB131 | ΔphbBAC | Eberhart et al. (2016) | |
| AZBB517 | pPCRTAGD4 | ΔAvin_06840::pyrF‐kanR, ΔpyrF | AZBB072 |
| AZBB520 | pPCRTAGD2 | ΔAvin_06840, ΔpyrF | AZBB517 |
| AZBB539 | pPCRARS63 | ΔarsABCD::pyrF‐kanR, ΔAvin_06840, ΔpyrF | AZBB520 |
| AZBB560 | pPCRARS62‐2 | ΔarsABCD, ΔAvin_06840, ΔpyrF | AZBB539 |
| AZBB586 | pPCRALGD6 | algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA::pyrF‐kanR, ΔpyrF | AZBB072 |
| AZBB589 | pPCRDPHB4 | ΔAvin_34710::pyrF‐kanR, ΔarsABCD, ΔAvin_06840, ΔpyrF | AZBB560 |
| AZBB638 | pPCRDPHB2 | ΔAvin_34710, ΔarsABCD, ΔAvin_06840, ΔpyrF | AZBB589 |
| AZBB639 | pPCRALGD5 | ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔpyrF | AZBB586 |
| AZBB652 | pPCRPYRF1 | ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA | AZBB639 |
| AZBB653 | pPCRPYRF1 | ΔAvin_34710, ΔarsABCD, ΔAvin_06840 | AZBB638 |
| AZBB682 | pPCRALC83‐3 | phbB::ACIAD0832‐Maqu_2220‐kanR, ΔAvin_34710, ΔarsABCD, ΔAvin_06840 | AZBB653 |
| AZBB712 | pPCRALGD11 | algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA::lacZ‐tetR, ΔphbBAC | AZBB131 |
| AZBB719 | pPCRALGD12 | algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA::lacZ‐tetR with single homologous recombination of pPCRALGD12, ΔphbBAC | AZBB712 |
| AZBB721 | ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC | AZBB719 | |
| AZBB744 | pPCRALC88 |
Avin_16040::ACIAD0832‐Maqu_2220‐strepR, ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC |
AZBB721 |
| AZBB805 | pPCRFAD7 |
Avin_15490::tetR, Avin_16040::ACIAD0832‐Maqu_2220‐strepR, ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC |
AZBB744 |
| AZBB808 | pPCRFAD7 | Avin_15490::tetR, ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC | AZBB721 |
| AZBB821 | pPCRRSMA3 |
Avin_34440(rsmA)::tetR, ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC |
AZBB721 |
| AZBB822 | pPCRALC73 |
Avin_16040::Maqu_2220‐strepR, Avin_15490::tetR, ΔalgD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA, ΔphbBAC |
AZBB808 |
Table 2.
Key plasmids and relevant derivatives of these plasmids used for the construction of Azotobacter vinelandii manipulated strains.
| Plasmida | Relevant genes cloned or plasmid manipulation | Parent vector(s) | Reference and/or source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pBB053 | pUC19 derivative. | Lenneman et al. (2013) | |
| pBB114 | pUC19 derivative with kanamycin resistance in place of ampicillin resistance. | Lenneman et al. (2013) | |
| pBB284 | BBa_J72214‐BBa_J72090 segment containing deoxyviolacein cassette in pUC19 derivative backbone. | pBB053 | Barney and Dietz (2024) |
| pBBTET3 | pUC19 derivative with tetracycline resistance in place of ampicillin resistance. | Barney and Plunkett (2022) | |
| pBBTET6 | Plasmid containing a tetracycline resistance cassette. | Schwister et al. (2022) | |
| pLACZF19 | Plasmid containing lacZ and tetracycline cassette. | Dietz et al. (2024) | |
| pPCRALC73 | Moved Maqu_2220 gene from pPCRALC29 into pPCRUNKK31 to express Maqu_2220 behind Avin_16040 gene promoter with streptomycin selection. | pPCRALC29, pPCRUNKK37 | Barney and Plunkett (2022) and Wahlen et al. (2009) |
| pPCRALC78 | Moved the Maqu_2220 gene behind the ACIAD0832 gene in pPCRWE391. | pPCRWE391, pPCRALC73 | This study |
| pPCRALC83‐3 | Fused ACIAD0832 and Maqu_2220 genes into a single gene product separated by seven asparagine residues. | pPCRALC78 | This study |
| pPCRALC88 | Moved fused ACIAD0832/Maqu_2220 gene behind Avin_16040 gene promoter with streptomycin selection. | pPCRALC83‐3, pPCRUNKK40 | This study |
| pPCRALGD3 | Cloned the flanking region downstream of algA into pBB114. | pBB114 | This study |
| pPCRALGD4 | Cloned the flanking region upstream of algD into pBB284. | pBB284 | This study |
| pPCRALGD5 | Combined the flanking regions upstream of algD and the flanking region downstream of algA into a single plasmid. | pPCRALGD3, pPCRALGD4 | This study |
| pPCRALGD6 | Inserted kanamycin and pyrF gene cassette from pPCRKAN15 between flanking regions of pPCRALGD5 for removal of algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA operon. | pPCRALGD5, pPCRKAN15 | This study |
| pPCRALGD11 | Inserted tetracycline and lacZ gene cassette from pLACZF19 between flanking regions of pPCRALGD5 for removal of algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA operon. | pPCRALGD5, pLACZF19 | This study |
| pPCRALGD12 | Inserted tetracycline and lacZ gene cassette from pLACZF19 between flanking regions of pPCRALGD5 for removal of algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA operon. | pPCRALGD5, pLACZF19 | This study |
| pPCRARS60 | Cloned the flanking region upstream of arsA into pBB284. | pBB284 | This study |
| pPCRARS61 | Cloned flanking downstream of arsD into pBB114. | pBB114 | This study |
| pPCRARS62‐2 | Combined the flanking regions upstream of arsA and the flanking region downstream of arsD into a single plasmid. | pPCRARS60, pPCRARS61 | This study |
| pPCRARS63 | Inserted kanamycin and pyrF gene cassette from pPCRKAN15 between flanking regions of pPCRARS62‐2 for removal of arsABCD operon. | pPCRARS62‐2 | This study |
| pPCRDPHB1 | Cloned the Avin_34710 gene and flanking region into pBB053. | pBB053 | This study |
| pPCRDPHB2 | Removed Avin_34710 gene from pPCRDPHB1, leaving flanking regions behind. | pPCRDPHB1 | This study |
| pPCRDPHB4 | Inserted the kanamycin and pyrF gene cassette from pPCRKAN15 between the flanking regions of pPCRDPHB2. | pPCRDPHB2, pPCRKAN15 | This study |
| pPCRFAD1 | Cloned Avin_15490 gene and flanking region into pBB053. | pBB284 | This study |
| pPCRFAD4 | Removed Avin_15490 gene from pPCRFAD1, leaving flanking regions behind. | pPCRFAD1 | This study |
| pPCRFAD7 | Inserted tetracycline gene cassette from pBBTET6 between flanking regions of pPCRFAD4. | pPCRFAD4, pBBTET6 | This study |
| pPCRKAN4 | Plasmid containing a kanamycin selection marker cassette. | Barney, Eberhart, et al. (2015) | |
| pPCRKAN15 | Plasmid containing the pyrF gene and the kanamycin selection marker cassette. | Eberhart et al. (2016) | |
| pPCRPHB40 | Cloned the phbB gene and flanking region into pBB053. | pBB053 | This study |
| pPCRPHB42 | Removed phbB gene from pPCRPHB40 and incorporated multiple restriction enzyme sites to construct an expression vector. | pPCRPHB40 | This study |
| pPCRPHB44‐2 | Moved the kanamycin cassette from pPCRKAN4 into pPCRPHB42. | pPCRPHB42, pPCRKAN4 | This study |
| pPCRPHB47 | Optimized plasmid to express genes behind the phbB promoter in A. vinelandii with kanamycin selection. | pPCRPHB44‐2 | This study |
| pPCRPRP7 | Plasmid containing deoxyviolacein operon cassette. | Barney and Dietz (2024) | |
| pPCRPYRF1 | Plasmid containing the pyrF gene and flanking regions. | Eberhart et al. (2016) | |
| pPCRRSMA1 | Cloned Avin_34440 rsmA gene and flanking region into pBB284. | pBB284 | This study |
| pPCRRSMA2‐2 | Removed Avin_34440 gene from pPCRRSMA1, leaving flanking regions behind. | pPCRRSMA1 | This study |
| pPCRRSMA3 | Inserted tetracycline gene cassette from pBBTET6 between flanking regions of pPCRRSMA2‐2. | pPCRRSMA2‐2, pBBTET6 | This study |
| pPCRSACB31 | Restriction site optimized plasmid containing sacB and kanamycin resistance cassette. | pPCRSACB28 | Dietz et al. (2024) |
| pPCRTAGD1 | Cloned the Avin_06840 gene and flanking region into pBB053 | pBB053 | This study |
| pPCRTAGD2 | Removed Avin_06840 gene from pPCRTAGD1, leaving flanking regions behind. | pPCRTAGD1 | This study |
| pPCRTAGD4 | Inserted the kanamycin and pyrF gene cassette from pPCRKAN15 between the flanking regions of pPCRTAGD2. | pPCRTAGD2, pPCRKAN15 | This study |
| pPCRUNKK37 | Gene expression vector to insert genes in place of Avin_16040 in A. vinelandii with streptomycin selection. | Barney and Plunkett (2022) | |
| pPCRUNKK40 | Optimized version of pPCRUNKK37 with additional restriction sites and deoxyviolacein operon for purple/white selection. | pPCRUNKK37 | This study |
| pPCRWE390 | Cloned the ACIAD0832 gene into the pBBTET3 plasmid. | pBBTET3 | This study |
| pPCRWE391 | Moved the ACIAD0832 gene into the pPCRPHB47 plasmid for expression of the gene behind the phbB promoter. | pPCRWE390, pPCRPHB47 | This study |
Sequences for all plasmids listed are available upon request.
Table 3.
Primers used for the construction of Azotobacter vinelandii manipulated strains.
| Primer | Sequence (all in 5′–3′ direction) | Plasmid construct |
|---|---|---|
| BBP2332 | NNNGAATTCG ATTCTTGACA CGACATCCTT CTATATCATT G | pPCRPHB40 |
| BBP2333 | NNNAAGCTTG TGATCTGACT GCGGAAATGA CCAGCCTCGA TG | pPCRPHB40 |
| BBP2334 | NNNTCTAGAG TCACATATGT TTCCCTTCCT TTTTTGTCGG AGACCCTGG | pPCRPHB42 |
| BBP2335 | NNNTCTAGAG GATCCAGATC TATGAAAGAG GTTGTAATCG TCGCTG | pPCRPHB42 |
| BBP2802 | NNNGGTACCG ATGCACGGCG CTGGACACCT TGTTGAC | pPCRDPHB1 |
| BBP2803 | NNNAAGCTTC AGGTTTTCCA GGGTCCTCTG CAGCCAG | pPCRDPHB1 |
| BBP2804 | NNNGGATCCC TCAACTGCGC GCCATCCACA AGATGATC | pPCRDPHB2 |
| BBP2805 | NNNGGATCCC TTCGGCGCTG GCGACGCTGA GCAGCATC | pPCRDPHB2 |
| BBP2823 | NNNTCTAGAC ATATGCGCCC ATTACATCCG ATTGATTTTA TATTC | pPCRWE390 |
| BBP2824 | NNNGAATTCT TAATTGGCTG TTTTAATATC TTCCTGCTTT G | pPCRWE390 |
| BBP2951 | NNNGAATTCG CAAGCTGTGC GAGCTGCTGC ATCG | pPCRTAGD1 |
| BBP2952 | NNNAAGCTTG ATCACCGAGG CCTCGAACGA GGGCAC | pPCRTAGD1 |
| BBP2953 | NNNGGATCCT AGGAGGTATT TCCCCGTAAC GCGG | pPCRTAGD2 |
| BBP2954 | NNNGGATCCT TTCCCCGTCA ACAAGCCGCC AG | pPCRTAGD2 |
| BBP3002 | NNNAAGCTTC TGCCGTTGTG CAGGTGCAC | pPCRALGD3 |
| BBP3022 | NNNGGTACCG GATCCGACAT CGAACGGCTC GAAGACATCT AC | pPCRALGD3 |
| BBP3023 | NNNAAGCTTG TCAGGATCCG CATACTGCAC CTACATAGCC CAGTCCGAAA ATG | pPCRALGD4 |
| BBP3024 | NNNGAATTCG AGCGTCGTTA CTCGTCGTTC GTTTGG | pPCRALGD4 |
| BBP3232 | NNNGGATCCG AGCATATGAT CATCCTGCTC TCAAAAAGAT GCGCTTTC | pPCRARS60 |
| BBP3233 | NNNGAATTCC ATCGTGCCAA AGCAAATCTA AAGGATTC | pPCRARS60 |
| BBP3234 | NNNGGATCCG AAACCGCCGG CGCATCCGGC CGCTGAC | pPCRARS61 |
| BBP3235 | NNNTCTAGAC GATGGCGACC CGCTGCTGCT G | pPCRARS61 |
| BBP3407 | GTTATTGTTA TTGGCTGTTT TAATATCTTC CTGCTTTGCA ATTACGC | pPCRALC83‐3 |
| BBP3408 | AATAACAATG CAATACAGCA GGTACATCAC GCTGACACTT C | pPCRALC83‐3 |
| BBP3948 | NNNAAGCTTG AAGCCAATAT CGAAGTGGAC ATGATCGTG | pPCRRSMA1 |
| BBP3949 | NNNGAATTCG AAAGTGCCTT CGGAAAACCG GACAGGATTT C | pPCRRSMA1 |
| BBP3950 | NNNGGATCCT TTTTCTCAAT TTTTGGCTTT GCAAACGGGG CAAAGGTGG | pPCRRSMA2‐2 |
| BBP3951 | NNNGGATCCG AGGGTCTCTC CGACCCGACG AGTCAGAATC AG | pPCRRSMA2‐2 |
| BBP3952 | NNNAAGCTTG ATCATCAGGC GCCGCTTCAT G | pPCRFAD1 |
| BBP3953 | NNNAGATCTG TTCGATCCGA AAGTCCGAAA GGACTG | pPCRFAD1 |
| BBP3954 | NNNGGATCCG AACGAACCCG CGTGCCCGCG CACATC | pPCRFAD4 |
| BBP3955 | NNNGGATCCG GGCATCCTCC CGGGTAGGGG CAGAC | pPCRFAD4 |
2.4. Lipid Analysis by GC and GC/MS
Gas chromatography (GC) was used to quantify lipids according to Barney et al. (2012).
2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron micrographs were obtained through the University Imaging Centers at the University of Minnesota using the JEOL JEM‐1400Plus Transmission Electron Microscope.
2.6. Alkylresorcinol Extraction and Purification
Cells of A. vinelandii strain AZBB821 were grown on standard Burk's medium for 4 days, and were pelleted by centrifugation at 7000 g for 8 min. Supernatant was removed, and the pellet was frozen and then lyophilized to remove any residual water. The lipid fraction was extracted using a mixture of equal parts methylene chloride, n‐hexane and tetrahydrofuran. The extract was concentrated in vacuo, redissolved in 3 mL of hexanes, diisopropyl ether, and dichloromethane (equal parts) and separated via flash chromatography on a silica gel column using a mixture of hexanes/diisopropyl ether/acetic acid (50/50/0.04 ratio, respectively). Fractions of 20 mL were collected, and fractions 2–4 (Figure 1) were combined and concentrated in vacuo to yield 0.236 g of the target compound (wax solid, Figure 1F) from 1.2 g of dry cells. This purified fraction of alkylresorcinols was used as a standard for further GC analysis. Thin‐layer chromatography was performed on commercial plates (Analtech) and visualized by charring after spraying with 20% sulfuric acid (Figure 1D) or heating after spraying with anisaldehyde solution (Figure 1E; Stahl and Jork 1965).
Figure 1.

Alkylresorcinol production in Azotobacter vinelandii. Shown in panel A are chemical structures for various classes of alkylresorcinols that are produced by A. vinelandii. Bonds shown in red are intended to indicate variability in the long chain alkane length of the lipids. Panel B shows representative chromatograms of the lipid fractions obtained from various strains of A. vinelandii constructed in this study. The alkylresorcinols correspond to the two peaks at approximately 22 and 23 min. Panel C shows a section from a transmission electron micrograph image of strain AZBB821. The alkylresorcinols manifest as large inclusions that are absent in the parent strain AZBB131. Panels D and E represent thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) plates of the lipid fraction obtained from AZBB821. Lane 1 (left) is the initial fraction, and lanes 3–5 were pooled from a chromatographic separation and the solvent removed to yield the final purified alkylresorcinol shown in panel F. The TLC plate in panel D was charred with sulfuric acid, and the TLC plate in panel E was stained with anisaldehyde.
3. Results
3.1. Biosynthesis of Elevated Levels of Native Alkylresorcinols
Native strains of A. vinelandii accumulate high concentrations of the extracellular polysaccharide alginate as well as high levels of the intracellular biopolymer PHB (Peña et al. 2002; Segura, Guzmán, et al. 2003). Both of these polymers represent large carbon sinks for A. vinelandii, and would be expected to compete for carbon metabolites and energy versus other desired products from biosynthetic schemes. Deletion of genes from either the alginate or the PHB pathways is reported to shift the ratios of the alternative product (Peña et al. 2002; Segura, Guzmán, et al. 2003), indicating that these pathways interact and compete with one another for intracellular resources. Additionally, under certain conditions, A. vinelandii undergoes a metamorphosis to form desiccation‐resistant cysts (Stevenson and Socolofsky 1966). During the formation of the cysts, cells accumulate elevated quantities of PHB and an additional lipid referred to as alkylresorcinol (Stevenson and Socolofsky 1966; Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003). Various regulatory networks are involved in managing the production of these different compounds, and the alkylresorcinols that are produced begin to replace phospholipids in the membranes during cyst production (Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003; Cocotl‐Yañez et al. 2011; Muriel‐Millan et al. 2015; Romero et al. 2013; Segura et al. 2009). The alkylresorcinol is a highly reduced waxy compound with the potential to serve as a feedstock to produce other reduced forms of carbon, and can be enhanced by growing A. vinelandii vegetative cells on n‐butanol or β‐hydroxybutyrate (Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003).
Because we believed that alkylresorcinol, PHB, and alginate accumulation would compete with other neutral lipids that we aimed to produce in A. vinelandii, we first directed our efforts to construct strains that removed key genes involved in the biosynthesis of these alternative products. For these various strategies, we employed genome engineering strategies that allow us to make extensive modifications to the A. vinelandii genome without leaving behind antibiotic markers. Our laboratory has developed two separate approaches for making markerless modifications in A. vinelandii that utilize either indigenous pyrF (Eberhart et al. 2016) or foreign sacB (Dietz et al. 2024) genes for conditional toxicity approaches, followed by counterselection to remove antibiotic resistance genes in a markerless manner. The use of these systems enabled the extensive genome modifications that we describe here.
As a first step, we targeted the phbBAC operon (AZBB131) or the large alginate algD.8.44.KJGXLIVFA operon (AZBB652) for deletion of PHB and alginate, respectively. Following independent removal of each of these larger clusters of genes, we observed a subtle increase in alkylresorcinol for AZBB652 (Figure 1B). A further strain was constructed that combined the deletion of both of these operons into one single strain (AZBB721), which resulted in further accumulation of alkylresorcinol. Hernandez‐Eligio et al have previously reported that RsmA posttranscriptionally represses the expression of PhbR (Hernandez‐Eligio et al. 2012). On the basis of this prior report, we speculated that RsmA may also act as a global regulator in A. vinelandii that is also hindering resorcinol production. To test this hypothesis, we disrupted the rsmA gene in an additive manner, generating the extensively modified strain AZBB821, which resulted in further accumulation of alkylresorcinol, achieving concentrations approaching 20% of the total dry mass of the cell, as determined by gas chromatographic and gravimetric analysis (Figures 1B and 1F). Further analysis of cellular composition using scanning transmission electron microscopy revealed large inclusions of alkylresorcinols that were not present in the preceding AZBB131 strain (Barney 2024), indicating that these lipids accumulate in the cytoplasm (Figure 1C).
While strain AZBB721 grew at a similar rate to the wild‐type (DJ) strain (Knutson et al. 2018), the addition of the disruption to rsmA did incur a growth penalty, resulting in a decrease in the doubling time from about 3 h under diazotrophic growth to about 7 h for AZBB821, likely due to the high accumulation of intracellular lipids, indicating that this increase in metabolic redistribution did result in some degree of cellular stress.
3.2. Biosynthesis of Wax Esters in A. vinelandii
To reconfigure intracellular wax accumulation in A. vinelandii for the production of wax esters, we constructed a strain without the arsABCD operon, the triacylglyceride esterase Avin_06840 or the PHB depolymerase Avin_34710 (also a potential esterase). The two esterases were removed as a precautionary measure. The strain AZBB682 was constructed by inserting the ws/dgat gene from Acinetobacter baylii fused to the Maqu_2220 far gene from M. aquaeolei VT8 (recently renamed M. nauticus) behind the phbB promoter of A. vinelandii. This construct resulted in the accumulation of wax esters (Figure 2) that were not present in the wild‐type DJ strain. This profile of lipids is similar to the wax ester profile observed for M. aquaeolei VT8 and A. baylii (Wältermann et al. 2007; Barney et al. 2012), confirming that the incorporation of the fused gene product into the genome of A. vinelandii is sufficient for the accumulation of wax esters. Quantification by GC indicated that the levels accumulated accounted for nearly 6% of the dry weight of the cell material. As expected, no accumulation of alkylresorcinol was observed in this construct.
Figure 2.

Wax ester production in Azotobacter vinelandii. Shown above are chromatograms for strain AZBB682 and wild‐type A. vinelandii. Wild‐type A. vinelandii accumulates resorcinol, which appears as two sharp peaks at approximately 22 and 23 min. Strain AZBB682 lacks the arsABCD alkylresorcinol operon, the triglyceride lipase Avin_06840, and the PHB depolymerase Avin_34710. It also carries the foreign ws/dgat from A. baylii and the Maqu_2220 gene encoding a fatty acyl‐ACP/fatty aldehyde reductase (far) from Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8 fused as a single protein product, and accumulates wax esters shown as a series of peaks between 19 and 23 min. Bonds shown in red are intended to indicate variability in the carbon length of the fatty alcohols and fatty acids of the wax esters (top). Shown on the top right is an illustration of how the ws/dgat‐far gene fusion has been targeted to the phbB promoter in A. vinelandii, versus the wild‐type arrangement of the phbBAC operon.
3.3. Biosynthesis of Fatty Alcohols
A. vinelandii does not contain a known fatty acyl‐CoA reductase or fatty acyl‐ACP reductase. As a result, it does not naturally accumulate fatty alcohols. In the process of constructing strains to determine if disruptions in key genes of the fatty acid degradation pathway would impact wax ester accumulation, we observed that disruption of Avin_15490 resulted in the accumulation of fatty alcohols in A. vinelandii. The Avin_15490 gene encodes an acyl‐CoA dehydrogenase that plays an important role in fatty acid degradation. Addition of disruptions of this gene to strains already containing the ws/dgat‐far fusion gene in addition to PHB and alginate disruptions (AZBB744) resulted strain AZBB805, which accumulated wax esters, but also accumulated an apparent excess of fatty alcohols. Quantification of the fatty alcohols by GC indicated that these free fatty alcohols accounted for just over 2% of the cell dry mass. Interestingly, the accumulation of wax esters was accompanied by a significant decrease in the accumulation of alkylresorcinols versus the AZBB721 strain (Figure 3). As a further test, we constructed strain AZBB822, which contains the PHB and alginate disruptions of AZBB721, but also the Avin_15490 gene disruption for fatty acid degradation (AZBB808). Further, instead of the fused ws/dgat‐far gene fusion, we only incorporated the far gene (Maqu_2220) alone in AZBB822, resulting in a strain that accumulated fatty alcohols, but not wax esters. In AZBB822, we still observed some resorcinol accumulation, indicating that the fatty alcohols are not hindering alkylresorcinol yields in the same manner that wax esters do (Figure 3). This interdependency between the three classes of neutral lipids is an interesting and unexpected caveat of our strategies that will require more complex strain construction in the future to determine possible explanations for these differences.
Figure 3.

Fatty alcohol production in Azotobacter vinelandii. Shown above are chromatograms for various strains of A. vinelandii. Wild‐type A. vinelandii accumulates resorcinol, which appears as two sharp peaks at approximately 21 and 22 min. Strain AZBB822, which contains the Maqu_2220 gene encoding a fatty acyl‐ACP/fatty aldehyde reductase along with a disruption in the Avin_15490 (fatty acid degradation pathway) accumulates a variety of C14‐C18 fatty alcohols eluting between 9 and 13 min. Strain AZBB805, which is identical to AZBB822, but also contains the ws/dgat gene from Acinetobacter baylyi produces wax esters in place of alkylresorcinol along with elevated levels of fatty alcohols. Bonds shown in red are intended to indicate variability in the carbon length of the fatty alcohols (top).
4. Discussion
There are many examples in the literature of efforts to produce various oils and waxes in microbial hosts as a potential replacement for petroleum hydrocarbons (Steen et al. 2010; Wältermann et al. 2005; Pfleger et al. 2015; Schirmer et al. 2010). Most of these approaches use common laboratory strains of yeasts or bacteria such as E. coli as a host for these biosynthetic routes. In most of these cases, the production of the hydrocarbon from these hosts would require feedstocks that contain a source of fixed nitrogen as a component of the growth medium. A. vinelandii is a common laboratory microbe that can be grown on a very simple medium composed primarily of sugars or other carbohydrates, and is able to obtain all of its nitrogen requirements from the process of biological nitrogen fixation through the enzyme nitrogenase (Barney 2024; Setubal et al. 2009). In this manner, A. vinelandii is nitrogen negative, resulting in the accumulation of fixed nitrogen in the remaining biomass that does not need to be derived from industrial nitrogen fixation processes. Our laboratory has pursued efforts over the past decade to yield elevated quantities of extracellular nitrogen compounds from cultures of A. vinelandii, demonstrating high yields of both ammonium and urea (Barney, Eberhart, et al. 2015; Plunkett et al. 2020; Barney and Dietz 2024; Barney and Plunkett 2022). In a recent report, we also demonstrated that modified strains of A. vinelandii still accumulate high levels of PHB in addition to the extracellular nitrogen that can be obtained (Barney and Dietz 2024). In this manner, it is possible to culture A. vinelandii and obtain elevated levels of ammonium from the spent medium, and then extract the PHB from the cell mass as a source of potential bioplastics.
Our laboratory also studies the enzymes associated with biological wax production based on the biosynthesis of wax esters, a biological wax that had been historically harvested from the whaling industry (Barney et al. 2012, 2013; Barney, Ohlert, et al. 2015; Knutson et al. 2017; Lenneman et al. 2013; Stöveken et al. 2005; Wahlen et al. 2009; Willis et al. 2011). These wax esters are a common component of the outer waxes that protect plant tissues and that are also found on the outer dermal layer of our own skin (Busta and Jetter 2018; Jetter and Kunst 2008). In more recent years, alternative biological sources such as jojoba plants have replaced the prior whaling source, and there is interest in applying other strategies to plants and microbes for the production of similar waxes (Kalscheuer et al. 2006; Metz et al. 2000; Miwa 1971). For these reasons, we were interested in investigating the potential to produce wax esters and other natural lipid hydrocarbons in A. vinelandii.
Our initial attempts to produce wax esters in A. vinelandii revealed levels of alkylresorcinols in the parent laboratory DJ strain that represented a significant quantity of material that could interfere in this effort. Additionally, we recognized that PHB might also compete for intracellular resources in any attempts to accumulate lipids. In prior work, we had recognized that while the DJ parent strain is diminished in alginate production, there are still significant levels of alginate in the growth medium, even though the goopy phenotype associated with the native A. vinelandii strain is seemingly disrupted (Barney 2024). The DJ strain contains a simple gene disruption in the algU gene, however, alginate production in A. vinelandii is based on a large suite of genes that are all present in A. vinelandii (Setubal et al. 2009). For these reasons, we set about the task of constructing strains that were devoid of these competing pathways to establish an initial parent strain that would be more amenable to lipid accumulation. During the construction of these strain, we realized that various combinations of these gene disruptions resulted in increased accumulation of alkylresorcinol. A combination of PHB, alginate, and rsmA disruptions resulted in the highest increase in lipid accumulation, representing a sevenfold increase in this natural lipid that is generally associated with cyst production. Contrary to the general narrative that alkylresorcinols are primarily associated with the outer membrane (Stevenson and Socolofsky 1966; Segura, Cruz, et al. 2003), in this study, we found the alkylresorcinols accumulating as intracellular inclusions in the cytoplasm (Figure 1C). These results indicate that as an alternative to PHB, A. vinelandii can be reconfigured to produce high levels of a suitable native biofuel precursor that can be easily extracted from dried cell mass, using simple solvents without the requirement for fixed nitrogen compounds in the growth medium.
In addition to alkylresorcinols, we also reprogrammed A. vinelandii to produce wax esters. A simple disruption to the Avin_15490 gene that is instrumental in fatty acid degradation resulted in the accumulation of fatty alcohols in addition to wax esters, indicating that A. vinelandii could be a suitable substitute to more common laboratory strains, such as E. coli, which can serve as a chassis for the production of biofuels, but is dependent on the provision of fixed nitrogen compounds in the growth medium to support its growth. While wax esters have potential applications as high‐value lubricants and components of certain cosmetics and skincare production, fatty alcohols could serve as a drop in replacement for diesel fuels. Our results support the potential to produce a range of different biological neutral lipids either alone or as part of a more complex lipid matrix that could serve as a potential crude oil replacement.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we have constructed a series of A. vinelandii strains with simple gene disruptions that accumulate high levels of a native biological wax while preserving the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen under aerobic conditions, a hallmark of the A. vinelandii strain. These results illustrate the potential of A. vinelandii to serve as a model chassis for the production of biofuel‐related compounds in a manner that is nitrogen negative. When coupled together with prior modifications, we obtained yields of nearly 20% of the cell dry mass as alkylresorcinols. We were further able to demonstrate the production of both wax esters and fatty alcohols through the heterologous expression of foreign genes from wax ester‐accumulating hosts. These results illustrate the potential of A. vinelandii to serve as a suitable chassis microbe for the production of bio‐oils and bio‐waxes without the requirement for reduced nitrogen compounds in the culture medium.
Author Contributions
Brett M. Barney: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, visualization, funding acquisition, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, project administration, formal analysis, supervision. Bilge Bahar Camur: methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Lucas J. Stolp: methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Natalia Calixto Mancipe: methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Benjamin R. Dietz: methodology, writing – review and editing, investigation, formal analysis.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
B.M.B. has applied for provisional patents related to the hyper accumulation of alkylresorcinol in A. vinelandii.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to B.M.B. (Award numbers 0968781 and CBET‐1437758) and from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Project Numbers MIN‐12‐070 and MIN‐12‐081) and award number 2020‐67019‐31148 through the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We would like to express our gratitude to the 2020 UMII MnDRIVE Graduate Research Assistantship for their support, which was instrumental to N.C.M. Similarly, B.B.C. extends her appreciation to the Fulbright program for the Graduate Research Assistantship support.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
- Barney, B. M. 2024. “ Azotobacter vinelandii .” Trends in Microbiology 32: 1034–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , and Dietz B. R.. 2024. “Precision Control of Ammonium Release in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Microbial Biotechnology 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , Eberhart L. J., Ohlert J. M., Knutson C. M., and Plunkett M. H.. 2015. “Gene Deletions Resulting in Increased Nitrogen Release by Azotobacter vinelandii: Application of a Novel Nitrogen Biosensor.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 4316–4328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , Lee H. I., Dos Santos P. C., Hoffman B. M., Dean D. R., and Seefeldt L. C.. 2006. “Breaking the N2 Triple Bond: Insights into the Nitrogenase Mechanism.” Dalton Transactions: 2277–2284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , Mann R. L., and Ohlert J. M.. 2013. “Identification of a Residue Affecting Fatty Alcohol Selectivity in Wax Ester Synthase.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79: 396–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , Ohlert J. M., Timler J. G., and Lijewski A. M.. 2015. “Altering Small and Medium Alcohol Selectivity in the Wax Ester Synthase.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 99: 9675–9684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , and Plunkett M. H.. 2022. “Rnf1 Is the Primary Electron Source to Nitrogenase in a High‐Ammonium‐Accumulating Strain of Azotobacter vinelandii .” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 106: 5051–5061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barney, B. M. , Wahlen B. D., Garner E., Wei J., and Seefeldt L. C.. 2012. “Differences in Substrate Specificity of Five Bacterial Wax Ester Synthases.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78: 5734–5745. 10.1128/AEM.00534-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burén, S. , Jiménez‐Vicente E., Echavarri‐Erasun C., and Rubio L. M.. 2020. “Biosynthesis of Nitrogenase Cofactors.” Chemical Reviews 120: 4921–4968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busta, L. , and Jetter R.. 2018. “Moving Beyond the Ubiquitous: The Diversity and Biosynthesis of Specialty Compounds in Plant Cuticular Waxes.” Phytochemistry Reviews 17: 1275–1304. [Google Scholar]
- Cocotl‐Yañez, M. , Sampieri A., Moreno S., et al. 2011. “Roles of RpoS and PsrA in Cyst Formation and Alkylresorcinol Synthesis in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Microbiology 157: 1685–1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dietz, B. R. , Olszewski N. E., and Barney B. M.. 2024. “Enhanced Extracellular Ammonium Release in the Plant Endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Through Genome Editing.” Microbiology Spectrum 12: e0247823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dos Santos, P. C. 2011. “Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering in Nitrogen Fixation.” Methods in Molecular Biology 766: 81–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eberhart, L. J. , Knutson C. M., and Barney B. M.. 2016. “A Methodology for Markerless Genetic Modifications in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Journal of Applied Microbiology 120: 1595–1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erisman, J. W. , Sutton M. A., Galloway J., Klimont Z., and Winiwarter W.. 2008. “How a Century of Ammonia Synthesis Changed the World.” Nature Geoscience 1: 636–639. [Google Scholar]
- Fekete, F. A. , Spence J. T., and Emery T.. 1983. “Siderophores Produced by Nitrogen‐Fixing Azotobacter vinelandii OP in Iron‐Limited Continuous Culture.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46: 1297–1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funa, N. , Ozawa H., Hirata A., and Horinouchi S.. 2006. “Phenolic Lipid Synthesis by Type III Polyketide Synthases Is Essential for Cyst Formation in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 6356–6361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García, A. , Segura D., Espín G., Galindo E., Castillo T., and Peña C.. 2014. “High Production of poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by an Azotobacter vinelandii Mutant Altered in PHB Regulation Using a Fed‐Batch Fermentation Process.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 82: 117–123. [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez‐Eligio, A. , Moreno S., Castellanos M., et al. 2012. “RsmA Post‐Transcriptionally Controls PhbR Expression and Polyhydroxybutyrate Biosynthesis in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Microbiology 158: 1953–1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill, J. , Nelson E., Tilman D., Polasky S., and Tiffany D.. 2006. “Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 11206–11210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen, H. L. 1954. “The Azotobacteriaceae.” Bacteriological Reviews 18: 195–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jetter, R. , and Kunst L.. 2008. “Plant Surface Lipid Biosynthetic Pathways and Their Utility for Metabolic Engineering of Waxes and Hydrocarbon Biofuels.” Plant Journal 54: 670–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalscheuer, R. , Stöveken T., Luftmann H., Malkus U., Reichelt R., and Steinbüchel A.. 2006. “Neutral Lipid Biosynthesis in Engineered Escherichia coli: Jojoba Oil‐Like Wax Esters and Fatty Acid Butyl Esters.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 1373–1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knutson, C. M. , Lenneman E. M., and Barney B. M.. 2017. “ Marinobacter as a Model Organism for Wax Ester Accumulation in Bacteria.” In Biogenesis of Fatty Acids, Lipids and Membranes, edited by Geiger O., 1–22. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-43676-0_19-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Knutson, C. M. , Plunkett M. H., Liming R. A., and Barney B. M.. 2018. “Efforts Toward Optimization of Aerobic Biohydrogen Reveal Details of Secondary Regulation of Biological Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenous Compounds in Azotobacter vinelandii .” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 10315–10325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenneman, E. M. , Ohlert J. M., Palani N. P., and Barney B. M.. 2013. “Fatty Alcohols for Wax Esters in Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8: Two Optional Routes in the Wax Biosynthesis Pathway.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79: 7055–7062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metz, J. G. , Pollard M. R., Anderson L., Hayes T. R., and Lassner M. W.. 2000. “Purification of a Jojoba Embryo Fatty Acyl‐Coenzyme A Reductase and Expression of Its cDNA in High Erucic Acid Rapeseed.” Plant Physiology 122: 635–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miwa, T. K. 1971. “Jojoba Oil Wax Esters and Derived Fatty Acids and Alcohols: Gas Chromatographic Analyses.” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 48: 259–264. [Google Scholar]
- Muriel‐Millan, L. F. , Moreno S., Romero Y., et al. 2015. “The Unphosphorylated EIIA(Ntr) Protein Represses the Synthesis of Alkylresorcinols in Azotobacter vinelandii .” PLoS ONE 10: e0117184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noar, J. D. , and Bruno‐Bárcena J. M.. 2018. “ Azotobacter vinelandii: The Source of 100 Years of Discoveries and Many More to Come.” Microbiology 164: 421–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz‐Marquez, J. C. F. , Do Nascimento M., Dublan M. A., and Curatti L.. 2012. “Association With an Ammonium‐Excreting Bacterium Allows Diazotrophic Culture of Oil‐Rich Eukaryotic Microalgae.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78: 2345–2352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña, C. , Miranda L., Segura D., Núñez C., Espín G., and Galindo E.. 2002. “Alginate Production by Azotobacter vinelandii Mutants Altered in Poly‐Beta‐Hydroxybutyrate and Alginate Biosynthesis.” Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 29: 209–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, L. G. , Cavalett O., Bonomi A., Zhang Y., Warner E., and Chum H. L.. 2019. “Comparison of Biofuel Life‐Cycle GHG Emissions Assessment Tools: The Case Studies of Ethanol Produced From Sugarcane, Corn, and Wheat.” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 110: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Pfleger, B. F. , Gossing M., and Nielsen J.. 2015. “Metabolic Engineering Strategies for Microbial Synthesis of Oleochemicals.” Metabolic Engineering 29: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pienkos, P. T. , and Darzins A.. 2009. “The Promise and Challenges of Microalgal‐Derived Biofuels.” Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining‐Biofpr 3: 431–440. [Google Scholar]
- Plunkett, M. H. , Knutson C. M., and Barney B. M.. 2020. “Key Factors Affecting Ammonium Production by an Azotobacter vinelandii Strain Deregulated for Biological Nitrogen Fixation.” Microbial Cell Factories 19: 107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero, Y. , Moreno S., Guzmán J., Espín G., and Segura D.. 2013. “Sigma Factor RpoS Controls Alkylresorcinol Synthesis Through ArpR, a LysR‐Type Regulatory Protein, During Encystment of Azotobacter vinelandii .” Journal of Bacteriology 195: 1834–1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabra, W. , Zeng A. P., Lünsdorf H., and Deckwer W. D.. 2000. “Effect of Oxygen on Formation and Structure of Azotobacter vinelandii Alginate and Its Role in Protecting Nitrogenase.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 4037–4044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schirmer, A. , Rude M. A., Li X., Popova E., and del Cardayre S. B.. 2010. “Microbial Biosynthesis of Alkanes.” Science 329: 559–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwister, E. M. , Dietz B. R., Knutson C. M., Olszewski N. E., and Barney B. M.. 2022. “ Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Gene Fitness During Diazotrophic Growth.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 88: 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segura, D. , Cruz T., and Espin G.. 2003. “Encystment and Alkylresorcinol Production by Azotobacter vinelandii Strains Impaired in Poly‐Beta‐Hydroxybutyrate Synthesis.” Archives of Microbiology 179: 437–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segura, D. , Guzmán J., and Espín G.. 2003. “ Azotobacter vinelandii Mutants That Overproduce poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate or Alginate.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 63: 159–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segura, D. , Vite O., Romero Y., Moreno S., Castañeda M., and Espín G.. 2009. “Isolation and Characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii Mutants Impaired in Alkylresorcinol Synthesis: Alkylresorcinols Are Not Essential for Cyst Desiccation Resistance.” Journal of Bacteriology 191: 3142–3148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Setubal, C. , dos Santos P., Goldman B. S., et al. 2009. “Genome Sequence of Azotobacter vinelandii, an Obligate Aerobe Specialized to Support Diverse Anaerobic Metabolic Processes.” Journal of Bacteriology 191: 4534–4545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smil, V. 1999. “Detonator of the Population Explosion.” Nature 400: 415. [Google Scholar]
- Stahl, E. , and Jork H.. 1965. “Terpene Derivatives, Essential Oils, Balsams and Resins.” In Thin‐Layer Chromatography, edited by E. Stahl. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-662-01031-0_11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Steen, E. J. , Kang Y., Bokinsky G., et al. 2010. “Microbial Production of Fatty‐Acid‐Derived Fuels and Chemicals From Plant Biomass.” Nature 463: 559–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, L. H. , and Socolofsky M. D.. 1966. “Cyst Formation and Poly‐β‐Hydroxybutyric Acid Accumulation in Azotobacter.” Journal of Bacteriology 91: 304–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stöveken, T. , and Steinbüchel A.. 2008. “Bacterial Acyltransferases as an Alternative for Lipase‐Catalyzed Acylation for the Production of Oleochemicals and Fuels.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47: 3688–3694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stöveken, T. , Kalscheuer R., Malkus U., Reichelt R., and Steinbüchel A.. 2005. “The Wax Ester Synthase/Acyl Coenzyme A: Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase From Acinetobacter sp. Strain ADP1: Characterization of a Novel Type of Acyltransferase.” Journal of Bacteriology 187: 1369–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villa, J. A. , Ray E. E., and Barney B. M.. 2014. “ Azotobacter vinelandii Siderophore Can Provide Nitrogen to Support the Culture of the Green Algae Neochloris oleoabundans and Scenedesmus sp. BA032.” FEMS Microbiology Letters 351: 70–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahlen, B. D. , Oswald W. S., Seefeldt L. C., and Barney B. M.. 2009. “Purification, Characterization, and Potential Bacterial Wax Production Role of an NADPH‐Dependent Fatty Aldehyde Reductase From Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 2758–2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wältermann, M. , Hinz A., Robenek H., et al. 2005. “Mechanism of Lipid‐Body Formation in Prokaryotes: How Bacteria Fatten Up.” Molecular Microbiology 55: 750–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wältermann, M. , Stöveken T., and Steinbüchel A.. 2007. “Key Enzymes for Biosynthesis of Neutral Lipid Storage Compounds in Prokaryotes: Properties, Function and Occurrence of Wax Ester Synthases/Acyl‐CoA: Diacylglycerol Acyltransferases.” Biochimie 89: 230–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willis, R. M. , Wahlen B. D., Seefeldt L. C., and Barney B. M.. 2011. “Characterization of a Fatty Acyl‐CoA Reductase From Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8: A Bacterial Enzyme Catalyzing the Reduction of Fatty Acyl‐CoA to Fatty Alcohol.” Biochemistry 50: 10550–10558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zabolotneva, A. A. , Shatova O. P., Sadova A. A., Shestopalov A. V., and Roumiantsev S. A.. 2022. “An Overview of Alkylresorcinols Biological Properties and Effects.” Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2022: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
