Abstract
Collagen, the most abundant structural protein in the human body, plays a vital role in wound healing, tissue repair, and skin integrity. Collagen-based products—ranging from wound dressings, skin substitutes, dental and orthopedic scaffolds, to topical cosmetics and oral supplements—have proliferated rapidly across healthcare and consumer markets. Medical applications leverage collagen’s biocompatibility, biodegradability, and scaffold-forming properties to manage chronic wounds, burns, and bone defects, while emerging technologies such as recombinant collagen and phage-integrated dressings target future innovations. Topical collagen improves skin hydration but is unlikely to replace endogenous collagen; injectable fillers offer temporary cosmetic enhancement with some potential risks. Oral collagen supplements, although marketed for skin, joint, and hair health, primarily serve as incomplete proteins and require cautious interpretation, as rigorous clinical evidence supporting transformative outcomes remains limited. Specific formulations such as undenatured type II collagen show promise for inflammatory joint conditions by promoting immune tolerance. In wound care, collagen-based scaffolds enhance healing by supporting fibroblast proliferation, reducing inflammation, and modulating moisture balance, while novel crosslinked matrices and living skin equivalents push regenerative medicine boundaries. Not all collagen-based products are the same. As the global collagen market surges toward $18.7 billion by 2030, users must distinguish between marketing claims and evidence-based benefits of specific preparations. Proper product selection should be guided by clinical context, molecular source (animal, marine, recombinant), and intended use with awareness of underlying scientific evidence critical to therapeutic success. Continued innovation, rigorous validation, mechanism of action studies and rigorous clinical testing are essential to fully realize collagen’s therapeutic potential across medicine and wellness.
Keywords: collagen, wound dressing, market
SCOPE AND SIGNIFICANCE
This article provides an overview of collagen-based products spanning wound care, skin health, regenerative medicine, orthopedics, dentistry, and consumer wellness. It critically examines collagen’s biomaterial properties—biocompatibility, biodegradability, and scaffold-forming capacity—that underpin its widespread applications. Common collagen-based products are systematically categorized based on scientific levels of evidence, offering users an evidence-based framework to navigate a rapidly expanding market. The work highlights emerging innovations such as recombinant collagen, 3D-printed skin grafts, and phage-integrated dressings, while cautioning against unsupported marketing claims. This work is not intended to be a systematic review. This is specifically a critical review (note peer-review process in Acknowledgments). While briefly noting key milestones in product development, the focus remains on technological trends, biomolecular sources, and functional advances. Projected to drive a $18.7 billion global market by 2030, collagen’s future hinges on rigorous validation, innovation, and responsible translation.1 Serving health care providers, researchers, manufacturers, and informed consumers alike, this article delivers a critical, science-grounded roadmap to understanding collagen’s evolving impact across medical, cosmetic, and biotechnology sectors.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE
Collagen, the dominant structural protein in the human body (25–30% of total body protein), has been incorporated into a multitude of medical devices designed for wound healing, tissue regeneration, and skin care. Collagen can easily be isolated from animal, plant and marine sources, as well as be produced in a laboratory synthetically or as recombinant protein (Fig. 1). The abundant accessibility and ease of use in clinical applications has led to a global market of patient-accessible products that promote positive healing outcomes compared with more traditional approaches.
Figure 1.

Collagen sources. Collagen is a protein abundantly available from a variety of sources. Collagen can easily be isolated from animal, plant, and marine sources. Collagens can also be produced in a laboratory synthetically or as yeast/fermentation-derived recombinant protein.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This article delivers critical insights for health care providers utilizing collagen-based products in clinical and wellness practice. It sketches the biological roles of collagen in wound healing, skin regeneration, orthopedic repair, and dental reconstruction, emphasizing how product-specific properties—such as molecular structure, source, crosslinking, and bioactivity—affect clinical outcomes. By categorizing commonly used collagen products according to levels of scientific evidence, the work offers an essential guide for evidence-based product selection. It highlights the importance of matching the product’s mechanism of action—such as scaffold support, moisture balance, matrix metalloproteinase inhibition, or antimicrobial enhancement—to the patient’s wound type and healing phase. Furthermore, it addresses emerging challenges such as biofilm resistance, impaired vascularization, and chronic wound recurrence, suggesting collagen innovations that may overcome these barriers. Health care providers are encouraged to critically evaluate marketing claims, understand product-specific risks, and prioritize products validated by rigorous clinical trials to optimize patient outcomes.
WOUND HEALING AND CARE
Collagen is the most abundant protein in the human body (25–30% total protein). There are at least 28 types of collagens of which over 90% of the collagen in humans is type I & III. Collagen-based products have proven beneficial, with utility spanning a range of products from medical devices to cosmetic and food applications. In 1981, Collagen Corporation (later Integra LifeSciences), launched CollaDerm, one of the first commercial collagen wound dressings with pre-marketing approval. In 1985, Johnson & Johnson introduced Instat, a collagen sponge indicated for hemostasis.2 In 1996, Integra LifeSciences introduced Integra Dermal Regeneration Template (collagen-GAG matrix for burns and complex wounds).3 In 1997 Smith & Nephew released Biostep (collagen-alginate dressing for moist wound healing). In 2000, SouthWest Technologies launched ColActive bovine collagen wound dressing. In 1998 and 2002, Johnson & Johnson received FDA approval for Fibracol (collagen-alginate wound dressing) and Promogran (collagen-oxidized regenerated cellulose matrix for chronic wounds), respectively (originally developed by J&J, now manufactured and sold by Solventum).4 These products represent several historical examples showing progressive developments in collagen-based product development. An increasing demand for these products is showing economic impact at the U.S. and global scales. In 2024 U.S. collagen market reached $2.5 billion USD (Global $9.9 billion) and, with compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.9%, is estimated to reach $4.94 billion USD by 2030 (Global CAGR 11.3%, $18.7 billion).1 Collagen dressings and scaffolds are currently used to manage chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure ulcers. Useful collagen-based products seem to support wound care by providing a scaffold or matrix for new tissue growth, reducing inflammation, and helping maintain a moist wound environment. This work evaluates the state of scientific evidence on the most common collagen-based products in the market.
Wound care
Wound healing can be defined by four chronological, overlapping phases that include hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and maturation.5,6 The hemostasis phase of wound healing consists of platelet hemostatic plug formation and fibrin crosslinking that creates a clot to prevent bleeding.7 This response is immediate and can last hours depending on wound size and depth. Once the wound opening has been plugged, initial inflammatory response activates and recruits immune cells, such as neutrophils and macrophages, that in turn, recruit fibroblasts, epithelial and endothelial cells from surrounding tissues through proinflammatory cytokine release.8 This initial inflammatory response occurs within hours and may last for days while infection surveillance and removal of bacteria and necrotic tissue is performed. Breached skin barriers allow for the introduction of microorganisms that can begin colonizing the wound surface, without impeding wound healing. However, if bacteria reach critical colonization, wound healing is hindered without triggering acute inflammation. A wound is considered infected when colony counts reach 100,000 organisms per gram of tissue per milliliter of fluid.9 Compared with acute wounds, chronic wounds that have been infected are often complicated by a chronic inflammatory response that can disrupt subsequent stages of wound healing and result in impaired wound closure.10 Overlapping with the resolution of the initial inflammatory phase, the proliferation phase expands and drives the activities of recruited fibroblasts, epithelial and endothelial cells, lasting on a scale of days to weeks.5 Fragments from degraded collagen promote infiltrating fibroblast proliferation, deposition of collagen and extracellular matrix (ECM) components during granulation tissue formation. Fibroblast-like cells, originating from wound-macrophages, populate the granulation tissue.11 Immune cells also contribute through the release of growth factors that promote keratinocyte re-epithelialization and endothelial cell angiogenesis programs.12 The maturation phase of wound healing regulates ECM remodeling, which occurs during new ECM synthesis where fibroblasts, endothelial and epithelial cells release matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) that balance this process with degradation activity.13 This balance ultimately defines the barrier functionality and tensile strength of healed skin, which due to differences in glycosylation and organization, can only reach up to 80% of original tissue maximum.14 Hypertrophic and keloid scars form as this balance shifts toward excessive ECM formation and fibrosis, which continues to undergo remodeling for months or years after wound closure. During the process of wound healing and ECM remodeling, relative abundance of collagen I and collagen III change to support different biological processes. In early wound healing, collagen III is more prevalent to support the inflammatory and proliferative phases. Collagen I, however, becomes more prevalent than collagen III as the wound progresses through ECM remodeling in the late stages of wound healing.15
Collagen synthesis is a tightly regulated biochemical process that begins with transcription of pro-α1 and pro-α2 chains and translation to pre-pro-polypeptide chains.16 These chains undergo N-terminal cleavage, lysine and proline hydroxylation, and glycosylation post-translational modifications in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, necessary for the assembly of the procollagen triple helix structure.17 Processing continues in the Golgi apparatus where procollagen is packaged into vesicles before secretion into extracellular space. Collagen peptidases then cleave the ends of procollagen to produce tropocollagen.18 Lysyl oxidase facilitates subsequent tropocollagen molecule cross-linking to form collagen fibrils.19 Molecular oxygen incorporation into nascent collagen is a critical step for collagen escape to extracellular space and proper maturation that provides tensile strength.20 In ascorbate insufficient conditions (e.g., scurvy) collagen molecules do not undergo post-translational hydroxylation by prolyl hydroxylase and lysyl hydroxylase and fail to mature, resulting in weakened vessel formation during angiogenesis and impaired wound healing.20,21
Wound care is often complicated by factors associated with disease states and comorbidities. For example, diabetes is associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a peripheral vascular disease, that is present in 7–12 million individuals in the United States with a prevalence disproportionately affecting black American patients.22 PAD can result in ischemic peripheral tissues that experience tissue loss, ulcers, and gangrene.20 Venous insufficiency, another peripheral limb ulcer-inducing condition, is a result of inflammatory-induced changes in venous walls and valves that cause retrograde blood flow. Interrupted blood flow in capillaries from hypervolemia or hypertension in veins can cause peripheral edema, deoxygenated venous blood pooling under the skin, venous ischemia and venous hypoxia. Subsequent skin damage in these areas can result in venous leg ulcers (VLUs).23 These hypoxic conditions are detrimental to wound healing. Hypoxia in wounds can be mild-modest to near-anoxic depending on factors restricting O2 supply and lead to chronic non-healing or stalled wounds.24,25 Chronic wounds in the United States continue to be a significant health care burden, affecting upwards of 10.5 million Medicare beneficiaries, and are a major contributing factor to lower extremity amputations.26,27 Lower extremity amputation mortality rates at 1- and 10-year follow-ups reached staggering rates of 33.7% and 80%, respectively.28
Acute moderate hypoxia, but not severe hypoxia, in wound beds stimulate healing through pro-angiogenic hypoxia inducible factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling.20 Severe near-anoxic hypoxia, however, leads to stalled wound healing by downregulating cell signaling and angiogenesis, inhibiting aerobic glycolysis that is required to meet the energy demands of a healing wound as well as by inhibiting collagen synthesis.20,29,30 Oxygen supply is required for stages of collagen deposition, polymerization, and maturation that are necessary structural components for new capillary tube formation during angiogenesis.31,32 With poor collagen deposition, weak tensile strength, and immature vessel formation, stalled wound healing exposes the wound bed to greater risk of infection and subsequent complications. Collagen-based dressings can be utilized to improve healing outcomes in ischemic wounds. In recent porcine ischemic full-thickness excisional wound studies, application of a modified collagen gel (MCG) induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1–1 and VEGF expression, resulting in more endothelial cell infiltration and vascularization during healing.33 Specifically, the MCG increased the initial transitory inflammation response, proliferative phase, angiogenesis and tissue maturation during remodeling, which showed improvement in three of the four phases of wound healing (inflammation, proliferation, maturation).34 Mechanistically, a MCG dressing improved anti-inflammatory signaling through interleukin (IL)-10 production via the cytokine regulating miR-21-c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway, increased the ratio of anti-inflammatory/pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization, and promoted angiogenesis through VEGF expression.35 The microRNA miR-200 family has been implicated in hypoxia and ischemic tissue damage.36 In an in vivo diabetic wound healing animal model, topical tissue nanotransfection of anti-miR-200b oligonucleotide promoted therapeutic tissue vascularization with significantly increased collagen deposition at the ischemic wound site.37
Microbes infecting an open wound have the potential to develop a planktonic (free-living) infection, or they may form a polymicrobial aggregate known as biofilm.38 Biofilm aggregates are able to adapt to their environment, as well as evade host immune cells and antimicrobials due to a protective extracellular polymeric layer.39 Treatment of infected wounds is typically a combination of standard of care debridement and topical antimicrobials (such as hypochlorous acid) used in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial therapy. However, the resistant/evasive nature of biofilms coupled with an inability to easily visualize them results in high rates of biofilm recidivism. Biofilm infection not only contributes to open wound chronicity but also undermines the structural integrity of collagen as wound closure occurs. S. aureus biofilm infection, for example, represses miR-143, resulting in an upregulation of collagenolytic matrix metalloproteinase-2 and subsequent degradation of collagen type I as the wound heals. This results in a wound that achieves visual closure; however, the compromised tensile integrity of the newly formed skin means that the wound is likely to recur, seemingly spontaneously over time.40 The transepidermal water loss study performed by the NIDDK Diabetic Foot Consortium shows that wounds that close without re-establishing barrier function are likely to recur.41,42 With 78.2% of chronic wounds showing signs of biofilm infection, identifying or synthesizing wound dressings that not only promote wound healing, but also eradicate biofilms, is a high priority in wound care. The use of biomaterials, including collagen-based dressings and scaffolds, has been beneficial in treating chronic wounds due to their biocompatibility and biodegradability, as well as properties that promote fibroblast infiltration and proliferation.43 Stabilized pericardial collagen matrix, a cross-linked stabilized acellular equine pericardium-derived collagen matrix dressing, has been mechanistically shown to recruit macrophages to wounds and upregulate antimicrobial peptide human keratinocyte β-defensin (HDB-1) during wound healing, as well as calgranulin S100A9. HDB-1 protects the wound from microbial growth by directly disrupting bacterial membranes while S100A9 suppresses bacterial and fungal growth and recruits phagocytic immune cells to the site of injury.44
Collagen-based dressings
Collagen serves as the principal structural ECM protein in the skin, tendon, and bone.45 The most common collagen types (I–V) are differentially expressed within various tissues throughout the body: collagen I primarily in skin, tendon, bone, muscle, heart, lungs, and vessels; collagen II in cartilage; collagen III in vessels uterus and bowel; collagen IV in basement membranes; and collagen V in hair and nails.15,46 Because of its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low immunogenicity, collagen has been used as a biomaterial for a wide range of applications. Collagen has been incorporated into products used for wound dressings, dental surgery, orthopedics, tissue engineering, pharmaceutical therapeutics, as well as food and cosmetic products (Fig. 2).47 Traditional dressings composed of inert materials, such as cotton gauze, provide a passive protective barrier to prevent environmental debris and contamination from entering a wound. These dressings provide a layer of protection to promote healing and minimize risk of infection; however, they also have poor absorptive properties and moisture regulation that can cause wounds to dry out or dressings to adhere to wound and result in the need for frequent dressing changes.48 Alternatively, semi-permeable wound dressings can adhere tightly to wounds to confine wound exudates and maintain a moist and oxygenated wound healing environment.48,49 While semi-permeable polyurethane-based dressings permit oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water vapor to pass through, they do not have moisture absorption or MMP neutralizing properties, thus limiting their most effective application to acute wounds and pressure ulcer prevention.50 Managing wound exudates, moisture control, MMP neutralizing activity, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, biodegradability, and antimicrobial activity are desirable properties in wound dressings that have prompted advances in dressing innovation and the development of collagen, alginate, elastin, hyaluronic acid (HA), and chitosan-based bioactive dressings, as well as living skin equivalents.51–56 Bioactive dressings are often combined with synthetic, chemical, or metallic antimicrobial agents to prevent wound infection during the healing process, which can be essential in the treatment of chronic slow-healing wounds.57 Collagen-based bioactive wound care products have been developed for a multitude of applications and come in a variety of forms including dressings, sponges, gels, cross-linked hydrogels, powders, acellular scaffolds, and skin-like substitutes.
Figure 2.

Collagen devices. Collagen, both native and hydrolyzed (image inset), has been used in a multitude of clinical products and devices. These products have shown positive outcomes in patients with regard to wound healing, cardiovascular regeneration, orthopedic repair, dental plugs and regeneration, dietary supplementation, and cosmetic implant and augmentations.
Collagen, as the primary structural protein in extracellular matrices, serves as a base material for wound dressings that are biocompatible, low antigenic, nontoxic, and biodegradable.58 Collagen can be sourced from animals, plants or produced as recombinant protein, with porcine collagen being most similar to human collagen. Other animals commonly sourced include bovine, equine, ovine, rodent, poultry, and various marine animals.59–62 Air-drying or freeze-drying collagen can produce collagen film dressings that easily adhere to wounds and can promote keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal remodeling.63 These films can be combined with growth factors, drugs, or nanoparticles for the slow-release treatment of wounds. However, collagen films are restricted for use on smaller wounds as excessive exudate and leakage can lead to pathogenic infiltration and infection.64 Freeze-drying is also used to make collagen sponges that are porous scaffold materials, which retain mechanical strength, plasticity, and absorptive properties.65 Collagen sponge properties are arguably more suitable for chronic wounds, dental applications, ulcers, and full-layer burn wounds with high levels of exudate as they are highly absorptive without adhering to wound beds. Native fibrous collagen matrix membranes have been utilized as guided bone regeneration dressings because of claimed better mechanical and osteoinductive properties than collagen sponges.66 Collagen membranes combined with growth factors can promote an osteogenic environment that promotes horizontal bone augmentation and regeneration.67 With similar activity, collagen plugs have been developed to guide bone regeneration following tooth extractions. Placed in the extraction socket, collagen plugs stabilize blood clots and support an osteogenic environment that can be further promoted with the addition of autologous bone chips.66
Crosslinked collagen hydrogels may provide a transparent semi-permeable scaffold with high moisture content to possibly promote wound healing and necrotic tissue autolysis debridement.68–70 Non-adherence to the wound prevents tissue agitation and damage when the dressing is replaced. Additional crosslinking with HA and chitosan can improve the hydrogel water retention and bacterial barrier function, while also promoting cell migration, proliferation, and adhesion.71 Collagen hydrogels, like other collagen dressings, can be combined with antibacterial peptides or growth factors to prevent bacterial growth and promote angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation, and tissue regeneration.72–74
Granulated or powdered hydrolyzed collagen, unlike hydrogels, tends to have minimal crosslinking and can vary in particle size based on methods of preparation (Fig. 3).75 Collagen powders can be packed into ulcers, second-degree burns and wounds where they absorb exudate, control minor bleeding, and form a gel-like barrier that protects a moist wound environment.5 Collagen powders, similar to hydrogels, can be used as drug delivery systems that are activated upon contact with the wound where high surface area ratio lends rapid delivery for treatments.76
Figure 3.

Intact versus hydrolyzed collagen. Intact collagen contains substantial crosslinking necessary for the structural support network it forms in the extracellular matrix. Hydrolyzed collagen peptides (often in granulated or powder products) tend to have minimal crosslinking and can vary in size based on methods of preparation. Receptors on fibroblasts and macrophages can bind hydrolyzed or degraded collagen peptides, which signal for proliferation, infiltration, and immune responses necessary in the wound healing process.
In addition to collagen being used as a bioactive dressing, acellular collagen scaffolds and living skin equivalents are also being utilized as effective skin graft substitutes. Decellularized fish skin, for example, is structurally similar to mammalian skin and exhibits high biocompatibility, porosity, absorptive capacity, biodegradability, and low immunogenicity.77 Decellularized marine collagen appears to offer a notable advantage over mammalian-derived collagens by exhibiting a reduced risk of disease transmission when used as a graft in human patients.78–81 Decellularized collagen grafts from marine or mammalian sources have a structural advantage in the treatment of full thickness wounds and soft tissue augmentation with positive outcomes in thousands of clinical cases dating back to the mid-1990s.82 Living skin equivalents are being designed to treat similar severe wounds through tissue engineering. Using a collagen gel, sponge, scaffold, or hydrogel as a common starting material, living skin equivalents are seeded with autologous (patient-derived) or allogenic (neonatal or newborn foreskin-derived) fibroblasts and keratinocytes to create a biocompatible dermal graft equivalent.56 These living skin equivalents are applicable to deep wounds where collagen sponges and membranes are insufficient, including diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, full-thickness burns, and other skin replacement procedures. Decellularized collagen scaffolds are also being used in the development of biological medical devices for hernia and heart valve repair.83–88
The collagen-based wound care market is evolving rapidly, with several innovative products in the pipeline leveraging advanced biomaterials, bioengineering, and antimicrobial technologies. Rigorous clinical studies are required as new products advance to the market. CollPlant (Israel) is developing rhCollagen (recombinant human collagen) from tobacco plants, expected to enter advanced wound care applications (e.g., 3D-printed skin grafts).89 Potential benefits include lower immunogenicity, scalable production, and no animal-derived risks. Yeast/fermentation-derived collagen are under development for the wound care market. Companies such as Geltor (United States)90 and Jellatech (Denmark)91 are working on biosynthetic collagen for medical use, including wound dressings. Phage-integrated collagen comprises bacteriophage-infused dressings designed to target pathogens such as MRSA and Pseudomonas. These dressings are currently in clinical trials by Nextbiotics & Adaptive Phage Therapeutics. In addition, companies such as Pandorum Technologies (India)92 are developing 3D-printed collagen-based corneas, while Poietis (France)93 is testing 3D-printed collagen-based living skin for the treatment of burns and chronic ulcers. Drug-eluting collagen dressings are in the pipeline. Platelet-derived growth factor/VEGF-loaded collagen (similar to Regranex but cheaper) are in development by Helix Biomedix.
REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
Regenerative medicine94 is a rapidly developing field in health care. This evolving field of study harnesses cells, scaffolds, gene delivery, or their combination to heal damaged or diseased tissue back to their native functional state.95 Since the first U.S. FDA approved skin substitute came to market in 1997, tissue engineers have developed multiple approaches to treat a variety of wounds, from mild and severe burns to abrasions and lacerations. While mild wounds may heal in days, severe wounds or wounds with complications from underlying disease or infection require the assistance of a scaffold structure capable of maintaining a moist wound environment, as well as modulating the phases of healing to bring complete closure. Collagen has come to the forefront of many approaches because of its biocompatibility, bioactivity, and low antigenicity.58 Often used as a wound dressing, collagen-based products come in sheets, powders, and hydrogels, among others (Tables 1–6).
Table 1.
Level of evidence 1
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action (MoA) | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlloDerm LifeCell Corporation |
Aseptic decellularized human dermal matrix; two forms: freeze-dried or ready to use; contains collagen, elastin, and laminin | Level 1 Level 4 Level 7a |
Human skin allograft that has had epidermic and cells removed to prevent tissue rejection | Indicated for soft tissue repair; breast implant reconstruction following mastectomy; skull base reconstruction; periodontal surgeries, dural replacements in neurosurgery, abdominal hernia, head, and neck. | Low levels of fibroblast and blood vessel infiltration compared with other acellular dermal matrices; initial infiltrate of inflammatory macrophages, followed by proliferative phase where endothelial cells can promote revascularization in 7 days (subcutaneous models) | AlloDerm patients showed higher risk of infection and more unplanned operating room visits than other acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) | 96–101 |
| Apligraf ■ Organogenesis Inc. |
Bovine type I collagen matrix cultured with allogeneic male neonatal fibroblasts and keratinocytes | Level 1 Level 3 Level 5 Level 7b |
Full-thickness skin equivalent used to treat chronic diabetic and venous ulcers; temporary biological dressing, providing growth factors to the wound | Indicated for use with standard therapeutic compression for the treatment of noninfected partial and full thickness skin ulcers due to venous insufficiency of >1 month duration and which have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy | Apligraf application invokes an inflammatory response which is essential for acute wound healing; possibly reverts the chronic inflammatory response in nonhealing wounds to a beneficial acute inflammatory signaling response; hypothesized mechanisms include Apligraf secreting growth factors and cytokines of the prohealing pathways, stimulating venous leg ulcer (VLU) cells to activate healing pathways, or a combination of the two | The use of Apligraf in conjunction with compression therapy is a safe and effective way to treat VLUs; patients were twice as likely to achieve complete wound closure by 6 months, and over 60% more effective in achieving wound closure than active control | 102–112 |
| Biodesign (BioD) ■ Cook Biotech. |
Acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS); contains ECM collagen, glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, and glycoproteins | Level 1 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a |
Creates an environment that allows cells in the body to secrete growth factors and replicate; as the body heals, SIS is gradually remodeled and integrated into the body, leaving behind organized tissue that provides long-term strength | Implantation to reinforce soft tissue; chordee correction; Peyronie’s disease; urethral repair; anorectal fistula repair reinforcement, rectal prolapse/rectal intussusception repair; ventral and hiatal hernia repair; dura mater graft; duraplasty graft; tympanic membrane perforation closure | Reduces profibrotic gene and protein expression (thrombospondin-1 and fibronectin-1) in fibroblasts; reduces levels of latent transforming growth factor which, in combination with fibronectin-1 downregulation, suggests a mechanism with which BioD scaffolds hinder normal and keloid fibroblast profibrotic responses during tissue repair | Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair patients had long and durable relief of symptoms and improvement in quality of life with SIS; SIS myringoplasty yielded reduced surgical time with no adverse events | 113–120 |
| Bio-Gide □ Geistlich Pharma AG |
Bilayer noncrosslinked porcine collagen membrane with a dense film layer to prevent soft tissue invasion | Level 1 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a |
Collagen membrane for reliable bone regeneration and optimal tissue integration; permits prompt and homogeneous vascularization and so brings about optimal tissue integration and wound stabilization; intended to be used in the treatment of hard and soft tissue defects in oral and maxillofacial surgery | Augmentation around implants placed in immediate or delayed extraction sockets; localized ridge augmentation for later implantation; alveolar ridge reconstruction for prosthetic treatment; filling of bone defects after root resection; cystectomy, removal of retained teeth, guided bone regeneration in dehiscence defects; filling peridontal defects; elevation of the maxillary sinus floor; filling of peri-implant devices; can be used in combination with a void filler, such as Bio-Oss Collagen | Collagen fibers provide an osteophilic matrix that guides bone towards the center of a defect; intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen fibrils occurs spontaneously and presumed independent of osteoblast activity | Long-term data over 12 to 14 years show predictable results of bone augmentations; Bio-Gide use resulted in lower occurrence of wound dehiscence than control; Bio-Oss Collagen and Bio-Gide together limit the loss in alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction | 121–132 |
| Bio-Oss Collagen □ Geistlich Pharma AG |
90% Bio-Oss natural bone mineral granules and 10% porcine collagen type I | Level 1 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6b |
Designed to stabilize clots, promote bone regeneration, and improve bone quality; intended to be used in the treatment of hard tissue defects in oral-maxillofacial surgery. | For augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge: filling of periodontal defects; filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy; filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge; elevation of the maxillary sinus floor; filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and guided bone regeneration (GBR); filling of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for GBR | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims Bio-Oss Collagen promotes rapid vascularization and epithelial regeneration, as well as encouraging bone regeneration. | Prospective 10-year follow-up demonstrated that the great majority of the implants maintained successful soft tissue health and dimensional buccal stability; Bio-Oss Collagen and Bio-Gide together limit the loss in alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction | 123,133–141 |
| CellerateRX Surgical Powder □ Sanara MedTech |
Hydrolyzed type I bovine collagen | Level 1 Level 2 Level 5 Level 7a |
Hydrolyzed collagen fragments do not have to be broken down by the body before use; soluble; compatible with negative pressure wound therapy | Intended for surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, partial and full thickness wounds, and first- and second-degree burns | CellerateRX differentially induced phagocytosis, efferocytosis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in murine wound macrophages at early and late phases of the inflammatory response; potentiated proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines at appropriate stages of wound healing; improved wound perfusion and closure; improved the quality of wound healing by improving breaking strength of the closed wound tissue; this predicts fewer wound recurrence in CellerateRX-treated wounds | CellerateRX powder appears to attenuate postoperative lymphorrhea and blood loss in patients; suggests benefits for high-risk patients and blood loss complications | 142–152 |
| EpiFix □ Mimedx |
Dehydrated human amnionic/chorionic membrane (dHACM) tissue graft that contains extracellular biomacromolecules including collagen type IV, V, VII, proteins, fibronectins, laminins, proteoglycans, and GAGs | Level 1 Level 3 Level 5 Level 7b |
Processed via a PURION, a patented approach that preserves the ECM and regulatory proteins while removing the contaminants in the blood through a proprietary cleansing procedure | Placental tissue allograft available in sheet and mesh/fenestrated configurations in a variety of sizes to reduce wastage; indicated for acute and chronic wounds, debridement, dehisced wounds, diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, Mohs repair | Fibroblast and keratinocyte infiltrates are presumed to result in paracrine signaling to support angiogenesis, tissue homeostasis, as well as regulated cytokine and growth factor expression to facilitate wound healing | Subjects treated with EpiFix had a significantly higher probability of complete healing within 12 weeks versus without EpiFix; results confirm the advantage of EpiFix allograft as an adjunct to multilayer compression therapy for the treatment of nonhealing, full-thickness venous leg ulcers | 102,153–159 |
| Fibro-Gide® □ Geistlich Parma AG |
Type I/III porcine volume stable collagen matrix | Level 1 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a Level 7b |
Intended to be used as an implantable device for regeneration and augmentation of soft tissue in oral and maxillofacial surgery. | For soft-tissue augmentation; localized gingival augmentation to increase KT around teeth and implants; alveolar ridge reconstruction for prosthetic treatment; recession defects for root coverage | Has mechanical properties appropriate to withstand the mechanical stresses that occur after wound closure in soft-tissue augmentation procedures, i.e., it has good volume stability and it withstands early resorption to allow the formation of new soft-tissue and degrades over time; the matrix is designed with an appropriate thickness to provide sufficient space for the ingrowth of new soft-tissue; the device becomes well integrated into the surrounding soft-tissue | Data show soft-tissue thickening around dental implants (1–2 mm gain buccally, 0.68–1.68 mm vertically); the augmented volume is stable in the long run (5-year data); morbidity is lower and surgery time is shorter than with using an autologous graft; used around teeth (single and multiple recessions), Fibro-Gide improves root coverage and gingival thickness | 160–169 |
| Hemopatch □ Baxter International Inc. |
Synthetic, protein-reactive monomer and a collagen backing | Level 1 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6a Level 7a |
Absorbable collagen pad intended for wound sealing and hemostasis | Hemostatic device and surgical sealant for procedures in which control of bleeding or leakage of other body fluids or air by conventional surgical techniques is either ineffective or impractical; used to close dural defects following traumatic injury, excision, retraction, or shrinkage of the dura mater | When placed on a wound with blood, or other bodily fluids, the hydroxysuccinimide functionalized polyethylene glycol (PEG) becomes activated and hydrolyzed, resulting in covalent amide bonding/affixing between the patch collagen, PEG, and tissue | Hemopatch is demonstrated to be an effective, easy-to-use hemostatic agent in open and minimally invasive surgery of patients with thrombin- or platelet-induced coagulopathies. | 170–182 |
| Mucograft and Mucograft Seal (EU MDR) □ Geistlich Pharma AG |
Type I/III porcine collagen matrix | Level 1 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a Level 7b |
Faster soft-tissue wound healing compared with autologous grafts; creates predictable soft-tissue dimensions for later soft-tissue management and allows for flexible timing of implant placement; to be used in closed and open healing situations to close wounds of oral mucosa and support wound healing and regeneration processes in case of oral mucosa defects and deficiencies | Covering of implants placed in immediate or delayed extraction sockets; localized gingival augmentation to increase keratinized tissue around teeth and implants; alveolar ridge reconstruction for prosthetic treatment, and recession defects for root coverage | Bilayer collagen structure where mechanism is based on porosity; low-porosity porcine peritoneum-derived layer maintains elastic strength for mucosal suturing; high-porosity porcine skin-derived layer permits tissue adherence, promoting bone-forming cells and tissue growth while also stabilizing blood clot; host tissue infiltrates begin depositing ECM 3 days postimplant; infiltrating macrophages are attributed to degrading the implanted matrix over time | At 6 postoperative months, the computed tomography showed that the bone volume was maintained; it is concluded that Geistlich Mucgraft Seal and Geitlich Bio-Oss are materials that can be used as an excellent possibility of maintenance of the socket structure, postexodontia | 82,183–197 |
| OASIS Wound Matrix □ Smith & Nephew |
Porcine type I/III collagen; SIS wound matrix dressing | Level 1 Level 5 Level 7b |
Support normal physiological functions via facilitating dermal cell infiltration; used in a variety of settings, including long-term, outpatient, and at-home care; naturally derived structure that supports healing process; incorporated and absorbed into the wound. | Management of wounds including partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure injuries, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, tunneling and undermining wounds, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, and surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs surgery, postlaser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence). | Contains GAGs that stimulate angiogenesis, inhibit coagulation, organize collagen deposition, promote differentiation and proliferation; matrix absorbs and protects albumin, heparin, fibronectin, FGF-2, and PDGF to promote infiltration of fibroblasts, vascular endothelial cells, neutrophils, and macrophages to the injured area | Wound closure (55%) in comparison with SOC (34%); 7 of 13 wounds closed fully after 12 weeks. |
198–204 |
| Omnigraft Dermal Regeneration Matrix/Integra Dermal Regeneration Template (IDRT) ■ Integra LifeSciences |
Bovine type I collagen/chondroitin-6-sulfate sponge with thin silicone layer on the epidermal surface | Level 1 Level 2 Level 5 Level 6b Level 7b |
Provides an environment for new skin and tissue to regenerate and heal diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) wounds | Postexcisional treatment of life-threatening full-thickness or deep partial-thickness thermal injuries; repair of scar contractures; and treatment of partial and full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers that are greater than 6 weeks in duration with no capsule, tendon or bone exposed, when used in conjunction with standard diabetic ulcer care | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that this two-layer skin regeneration product offers controlled pore size, porosity, and degradation rate allowing for cellular infiltration, neovascularization, and dermal regeneration while the semi-permeable silicone layer provides epidermal-like protection and moisture control | In RCTs with life-threatening burns, patients treated with IDRT needed thinner skin grafts, causing the donor site to heal sooner; patients with pediatric burns treated with IDRT scored better on multiple physiological markers and had better cosmetic outcomes than patients treated with the standard autograft-allograft technique; patients with DFU showed decreased the time to wound closure, improved components of quality of life, and had less adverse events compared with standard of care | 205–212 |
| Promogran Matrix □ Johnson & Johnson |
Collagen matrix; 55% bovine collagen and 45% oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) | Level 1 level 4 level 5 Level 7b |
Oxidized regenerated cellulose and bioactive collagen product that binds to and neutralizes destructive proteases in chronic wound fluid; Reduction of MMP burden in the chronic wound allows endogenous ECM protein cells to proceed to the formation of granulation tissue and normal wound healing |
In the presence of exudate, Promogran matrix transforms into a soft, confirmable, biodegradable gel, and thus allows contact with all areas of the wound; the dressing helps create a moist wound bed and an environment that supports wound healing; indicated for non-necrotic chronic wounds without infection including venous and arterial leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, and DFUs | Absorbs wound exudate liquid, forming a biodegradable gel that inhibits MMPs and promotes wound healing; the wound conforming gel binds and protects growth factors in an active state, that are steadily released back into the wound as the collagen matrix is degraded; collagen and oxidized regenerated cellulose bind and inhibit proteases detrimental to the healing process, including MMPs, elastase, and plasmin, likely through steric hinderance | While positive clinical outcomes have been observed, limited evidence exists, and future research is necessary to validate potential clinical and economic benefits | 213–222 |
| Therapeutic Nutrition Powder Juven | L-glutamine, L-arginine, citric acid, hydrolyzed beef collagen, sugar, calcium beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, ascorbic acid, dl-alpha-tocopheryl acetate, aspartame, zinc sulfate, acesulfame potassium, and vitamin B12. | Level 1 Level 3 Level 5 |
Ingestible Juven contains a unique blend of key ingredients to help support wound healing | Support wound healing by enhancing collagen production in as little as 2 weeks and to help build and maintain LBM in 4 weeks; also intended as a treatment for sarcopenia patients | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims collagen proteins give structural support to cells, but they also modulate inflammatory cell function; arginine promotes blood flow and protein production, which can contribute to wound healing; glutamine supports new tissue development and the immune system; vitamins C, E, B12, and zinc support the wound healing process; arginine and HMB improve metabolism and reduce inflammatory response | The specialized amino acid supplement led to a significant increase in collagen deposition (as reflected by hydroxyproline content) in subcutaneously implanted polytetrafluoroethylene tubes; oral consumption reduced cesarean scarring and promoted wound healing; no significant improvement in healing DFU | 223–230 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 1 ≥ 3 RCT; Level 2 = 1 well-designed RCT/multi-site study; Level 3 = clinical studies—observational/mechanism of action (MoA); Level 4 = historical cohort (retrospective) or case-control studies (retrospective with control group); Level 5 = other clinical studies (case series or studies as reference treatment, human ex vivo MoA); Level 6a = large animal with MoA; Level 6b = large animal observationnal; Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro. FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
Table 6.
Level of evidence 7
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen Gel Thermo Fisher |
Tail-derived type I rat collagen | Level 7b | Clear gel providing a 3D matrix or surface coated on tissue culture plates as a substrate for culturing primary cells | Laboratory use: cell culture, co-culture, transwell assay | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that rat tail collagen type I can be prepared as a clear gel providing a 3D matrix or surface coated on tissue culture plates as a substrate for culturing primary cells | TGF-β1 treatment of cultured human Tenon’s fibroblasts in collagen gel showed contraction by reduction in collagen gel size | 435–437 |
| Puracol Ultra ECM □ Medline |
Porcine mesothelium; decellularized, lyophilized, and sterilized porcine peritoneal membrane; contains types I, III, IV collagen; other proteins, including fibronectin, proteoglycans, laminin, elastin, fibroblast growth factors (FGF-b) | Level 7b | Has a significantly higher impact on new blood vessel formation compared with leading ovine collagen ECM and leading collagen/ORC | Completely bioabsorbable dressing is naturally incorporated into the wound over time. High retention of growth factors (FGF-basic, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], and TGF-β1) after the decellularization process, high angiogenetic potential in vitro and MMPs-inhibition to modulate inflammation while promoting healing. | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Puracol Ultra ECM inhibits proteolytic activity and retains collagen networks that highly resemble dermis structures that may contribute to positive wound healing outcomes; high elastin content which can induce cell migration and proliferation; retention and slow release of soluble growth factors (FGF-basic, VEGF, and TGF-β1) promotes angiogenic micro-vessel formation; growth factor retention also promotes host cell adhesion and proliferation; matrix MMP binding suppresses inflammatory state and supports proliferation | Showed comparatively high levels collagen and elastin (vs other grafts and biomaterials), and promoted micro-vessel formation; porcine mesothelium has the potential to be used as a wound healing material, considering its composition, resistance to enzymatic degradation, cytocompatibility, and angiogenic potential; a biofilm model showed that nanozeolite-entrapped antimicrobials have potential for alleviating biofilm-infected wounds | 341,418,438 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro. FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
Skin substitutes
Natural wound healing re-establishes a barrier between vulnerable inner tissues and an environment full of harmful substances and pathogens. Skin is the body’s first line of defense against environmental factors. Disrupting this barrier through wounds or disease exposes the body to risk of infection, which is exacerbated in individuals with compromising medical conditions such as diabetes and obesity.439 The ability to restore damaged skin with surgical intervention dates back 2,600 years ago. The “father of plastic surgery,” Sushruta, was an innovative surgeon in Kashi, India in the year 600 BCE.440 He was renowned for reconstructive surgeries, such as utilizing cheek flaps for nose reconstruction, as well as developing a code of medical ethics. Grafting techniques progressed steadily in the 19th and 20th centuries, leading to a profound breakthrough in 1981 when John Burke and colleagues developed an artificial skin substitute with a top layer of silicone polymer and bottom layer of crosslinked collagen and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs).441 This provided the foundation for tissue engineering techniques that led to modern collagen-based products designed for biocompatibility, while establishing a structural framework to promote more efficient tissue growth, reduce inflammatory response, maintain a moist environment, and inhibit microbial infection.
The first U.S. FDA approved skin substitutes were TransCyte (Advanced Tissue Science, La Jolla, CA) and Dermagraft (developed by Advanced Tissue Sciences, now marketed by Organogenesis Inc., Canton, MA). These products consisted of a polymer mesh scaffold on which human fibroblasts were cultured which secreted collagen, along with other ECM proteins, growth factors, and cytokines, to support skin wound healing. In the case of TransCyte, the scaffold includes a silicone membrane and the tissue was frozen to kill the cells and allow storage.442 Dermagraft was cryopreserved and the cells retained some viability.95 As dressings, they are indicated for partial thickness burns, surgical wounds, and diabetic foot ulcers without tendon, muscle, or bone exposure, providing improved patient wound healing outcomes compared with standard of care.272,442 More recent dressings have drifted away from the necessity of culturing live human fibroblasts, rather, developing dressings comprised of collagen has increased the shelf-life, long-term stability, and shortened preparation time prior to use, while still promoting wound healing outcomes. Combining modern collagen-based biomaterials with growth factors is an approach being used to support tissue regeneration in chronic wounds. For example, VEGF fused with a collagen-binding domain has been incorporated into a collagen-based biomaterial to essentially create a slow-release drug delivery system that promotes angiogenesis and revascularization of chronic diabetic wounds.443 Similar methods have been developed for collagen-B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2-adipose-derived stem cell scaffolds,444 collagen-copper/cobalt bioactive microfibrous glass mats,445 and collagen matrix hydrogel delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF).446 Puracol Ultra ECM has also been used to deliver FGF to promote regenerative wound healing in a small animal aortic ring assay.447
Cardiovascular collagen
Defects in collagen from mutations in the collagen type I/III genes can be responsible for cardiovascular diseases and abnormalities such as aortic dilation, aortic aneurysms, arterial dissection, and rupture.448 While defects in collagen can result in cardiovascular abnormalities, tissue engineered collagen products can be used to treat them in vivo. The most common surgical treatments for atherosclerosis, for example, still include vascular bypass and replacement. Patents with atherosclerosis, however, often have poor vein and artery health, making them poor candidates for autograft harvesting. Collagen-based vascular grafts have become alternative materials for transplantation when combined with other natural (fibrin, elastin) or synthetic (polyurethane, polydioxanone, polycaprolactone) materials, which can bolster collagen’s mechanical properties without diminishing the beneficial biocompatibility, cell adhesion, biodegradability, hydrophilicity, and weak immunogenicity properties of collagen.449 Dacron vascular grafts, for example, when coated with collagen have long-term secondary corrected 8-year patency rates >90%.450 Collagen engineered vascular products can also be utilized as drug delivery systems with VEGF and bFGF, promoting post-transplant endothelialization while limiting thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia.451 In the case of bFGF delivery, heparinized collagen-coated vascular grafts (with embedded heparin) resulted in long term patency by mimicking the mechanism of heparin sulfate present in native ECM of endothelial cells that binds and stabilizes bFGF, releasing it upon vascular wall damage, resulting in localized bFGF release and proliferation of endothelial cells.451 Antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides have also been incorporated into collagen-based vascular grafts to prevent perioperative infection.452 Collagen-based hydrogels have also been used as an injectable therapeutic to prevent myocardial infarction by providing ventricular wall thickness and mechanical support without hindering myocardial contraction. Studies have shown, however, that there is a therapeutic window post-myocardial infarction when this treatment is most beneficial because of pathophysiological stages of necrosis, inflammation, proliferation, and maturation.453,454 These collagen hydrogels have also been used as delivery systems for therapeutic drugs and stem cells to treat cardiovascular disease.449 Akin to hydrogels, collagen-based patch scaffolds have been developed to serve as epicardial dressings for reconstruction of large cardiovascular defects. These dressings can be loaded with conductive material, bioactive drugs, stem cells, and exosomes to facilitate the reconstruction and regeneration of large cardiac and vascular defects.449
SKIN HEALTH
Skin collagen synthesis
Skin, the body’s largest organ, structurally serves as a protective barrier against environmental stressors and damage. The importance of maintaining skin health throughout one’s lifetime has become a more widely accepted practice as awareness has spread of skin cancer as being the most diagnosed cancer in the world that is also preventable.455 Evidence for age-related weakened barrier functions has also supported the need for healthy skin practices.456 Photoaging, caused by prolonged exposure to extrinsic ultraviolet (UV) radiation, has not only been identified as one of the main risk factors for melanoma, but also has a profoundly detrimental effect on ECM deposition in the dermis.457 Photoaging causes fragmentation and degradation of collagen, the main structural component of ECM.458,459 Disruptions in collagen synthesis have been correlated with a spectrum of diseases that have been traced back to over 1,000 mutations in patients.460 Heritable genetic disorders have been identified that cause disrupted collagen fibril formation in skin biopsies.461 Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, for example, is one such disorder mostly attributed to mutations in COL5A1 and COL5A2 genes, and in rare cases COL3A1. Resulting haploinsufficiency of type V collagen can manifest symptoms in varying degrees of severity from mild to fatal, including skin hyperextensibility, joint hypermobility, tissue fragility, delayed wound healing and atrophic scarring, and vascular ruptures.462–467
Skin collagen is primarily derived from triple helix procollagen produced by fibroblasts.15 Collagen turnover occurs at different rates in different tissues, with a half-life of skin collagen (insoluble) of approximately 15 years, whereas cartilage collagen half-life can reach 117 years.468 Endogenous synthesis of skin collagen studies in 1964 revealed glycine as the most abundant amino acid making up its triple helical structure.469,470 Further study has shown that collagen’s amino acid composition is roughly 1/3 glycine, 0.7/3 proline (+hydroxyproline), and 1.3/3 other amino acids, and that limiting glycine and proline limits maximal collagen synthesis,471 with proline biosynthesis as a rate limiting factor.472 Glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline have now made their way into global markets in the form of hydrolyzed collagen peptides present in wound dressings, as well as skin care and food products.
Topical collagen applications
Topically applied collagen products are becoming more popular in skin care markets. However, topical applications of intact collagen capable of replacing endogenous collagen within the skin is a common misconception. Native collagen that has been topically applied has poor permeability and cannot penetrate the skin barrier.473 When hydrolyzed, even collagen peptides larger than six to seven amino acids cannot be efficiently absorbed (Fig. 3).474 One of the most common used topical collagen products is hydrolyzed collagen tripeptide (CTP) sequence Gly-X-Y (often Gly-prolyl-hydroxyproline [Pro-Hyp]). It is an abundantly available biological material that has low allogeneic properties, making it a desirable component for topical and oral collagen-based products.475 The application of CTP has been considered to contribute to smoothing of facial wrinkles and improving skin elasticity; however, these observations are also coupled with increased moisture content. Collagen is hygroscopic (attracts water), so when applied topically, it forms a moisturizing film that plumps the skin, reducing fine lines temporarily. It may also temporarily strengthen the skin barrier, preventing moisture loss (e.g., in dry or aged skin). High-molecular-weight collagen (in creams/sheets) may sit on the skin’s surface, creating an optical smoothing effect—similar to silicone scar sheets.476 Some hydrolyzed collagen peptides (small fragments) can arguably signal fibroblasts (skin cells) to boost collagen and elastin synthesis (via transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β] and other growth factors).476 Some collagen products may have antioxidant properties that neutralize free radicals (reducing UV-induced damage).474 Most of these plausible mechanisms require rigorous testing in appropriately designed clinical trials. The hype for such cosmetic and aesthetic products in the market seems to be frequently generated by aggressive marketing strategies not supported by rigorous science. Appropriate consumer caution and due diligence are thus warranted.
Collagen-based fillers
Collagen injections have been a trend in cosmetic research to fill facial voids, enhance volume and remove wrinkles. Conceptually, collagen injections in the mid-to-deep layers of the skin act as support structures that remove wrinkles and skin folds. Products claim that injected collagen is absorbed within a month of injection and replaced by native de novo synthesized collagen by 3 months postinjection.477,478 Rigorous clinical studies are necessary to support these claims. Recent retrospective analysis of clinical data for facial wrinkles treated with collagen type III injections showed significant improvement in experimental subjects compared to control subjects at 30 days postinjection.479 Ninety days postinjection, however, there was no significant difference between the groups, suggesting that the collagen filler was broken down and resorbed rather than replaced.479 Individuals considering use of collagen dermal fillers should also be cautioned that mild to severe complication risks have been associated with their use, including discoloration, necrosis, infection, vision loss, granuloma formation, foreign body reaction, and biofilm formation.480,481 Because of potential adverse events, including autoimmune response, which required sensitivity reaction testing, several collagen fillers (including Zyderm, Zyplast, Cosmoderm, Cosmoplast) have been discontinued.399,400 Noncollagen dermal fillers have also been developed as potentially safer or longer lasting alternatives. Injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), HA, calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyalkylimide, and silicone implants have been used to varying degrees of success.263,482 Challenges and complications vary depending on biodegradable (PLLA, HA, CaHA) and nonbiodegradable (PMMA, polyalkylimide, silicone) properties.483 Because of the short-term effects of collagen fillers that are typically depleted 3–4 months postinjection, HA has become a more commonly used alternative which can last 12–24 months.484 Collagen and HA dermal fillers currently have in vivo mechanisms of action that are not fully understood, as well as short and long-term complication risks that should be discussed with physicians before injection procedures. Additional rigorous scientific studies are required.
ORTHOPEDICS AND DENTAL APPLICATIONS
Tendon repair
Collagen-based scaffolds and matrices are used in bone grafts, cartilage repair, and tendon or ligament reconstruction (Fig. 2). They serve as a scaffold that promotes the regeneration of bone and soft tissues in joint repairs and spinal surgeries. Sports injuries, for example, are often associated with bone and tendon injury as a result of overuse or trauma. Tendons are connective tissues with a multitude of organized collagen fiber bundles.485 Tendon injuries are painful and typically slow to heal, even when treated with nonsurgical drug, stem cell, or physical therapies.486 bFGF can aid in accelerated tendon healing by promoting neovascularization during the proinflammatory phase, while also stimulating fibroblast production of type III/I collagens during the cell proliferation phase of healing. Overuse of bFGF can overstimulate these processes however, leading to fibrotic scar formation and potential tendon adhesions.487 A common musculoskeletal disability that occurs in approximately 8% of adults is rotator cuff damage, resulting from acute tear injuries or age-related degeneration.488 The use of acellular scaffolding, such as GraftJacket, retains intact collagen ECM and blood vessel channels with low immunogenicity.296,297 These acellular dermal matrices show promising results in repairing large rotator cuff tears in patients, with little to no adverse events.297 Another application of collagen-based products to support orthopedic regeneration comes from the use of dehydrated human placental allograft amnion-chorion membrane material (NuShield) that retains collagens, ECM proteins, growth factors, elastin, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans.305 When applied to tendon, spinal or nerve damage, placental allografts release growth factors and cytokines to promote fibroblast and keratinocyte migration and proliferation, while paracrine signaling subsequently regulates localized inflammatory responses.305 This dehydrated placental allograft material has shown promising results as regenerative treatments for tendons, nerves, spinal adhesions, and fibrosis, as well as treatment for chronic wounds.489,490
Bone grafting
Bone repair is a major challenge in the musculoskeletal regenerative therapy field. Common bone defects are the result of osteoporosis weakening of bones, traumatic fractures and breaks, osteomyelitis, periodontitis, congenital defects, and hereditary diseases.491 Mutations in the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes can result in multiple subtypes of osteogenesis imperfecta or “brittle bone disease.”467 The lack of suitable donors for bone grafting is compounded by the risk of immune rejection, while autologous bone grafting is limited by the patient’s own available donor material, which also carries the risk of causing irreversible damage when harvested. The application of collagen-based biomaterials provides a matrix for cell infiltration and proliferation that, when combined with porous material and factors such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) or bone morphogenic proteins (BMP), establish an osteogenic microenvironment that promotes osteoblast deposition of bone matrix.492,493 Recent clinical trials have shown that the use of calcium phosphate cement is useful in reducing fractures and pain while improving functional outcomes.494 However, limited osteoinductivity and resulting tensile strength make it an undesirable void filler for larger defects.494 Biomaterials have been making significant progress as alternative bone void filler options that contain collagen to promote bone healing processes. A combination of calcium phosphate, dibasic (DICAL), and purified type 1 bovine collagen (CopiOs) has been used as an osteoconductive sponge scaffold to promote regeneration of bone voids (Table 3). The DICAL-collagen product, when coated with BMP, has shown success in filling post-harvest iliac crest donor sites in spinal fusion surgery and in promoting bone growth in large tibial defects in animal models by creating a microenvironment that supports osteogenesis.346 This approach is designed to mitigate donor site risk complications of morbidity (9.4 – 49%) and chronic pain at iliac crest autograft harvest sites.495–499 Combining collagen-based biomaterial (Healos) with bone marrow aspirate (BMA), that has undergone selective cell retention of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), has produced a substitute for autologous iliac crest bone grafts in lumbar spinal fusion procedures.382 Strips of this biomaterial loaded with MSCs and CTGF have been implanted in posterolateral fusion procedures in 21 patients, 100% of which achieved successful solid bilateral fusions.382 For the treatment of long bone fractures, porous beads comprised of hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate ceramic, and fibrillar type 1 bovine collagen (CollaGraft) have been developed to create a biodegradable osteoconductive scaffold.253 When preloaded with BMA, this biodegradable scaffold has been used successfully to promote bone repair in patients with long bone fractures.253,254 This combination has also shown promise as an autologous bone graft substitute in large animal models.255 The use of collagen-based biomaterials for treatment of bone damage has proven to be beneficial in repairing small bony voids and long bone fractures, as well as providing scaffold and osteogenic support for bone fusion procedures (Tables 1–6). These same principles have been used to promote wound healing and bone regeneration in oral and maxillofacial surgeries.
Table 3.
Level of evidence 3
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACell MatriStem Matrix □ Integra LifeSciences |
Acellularized basement membrane and tunica propria layers of the porcine bladder; ECM proteins that include type I/III collagen, glycosaminoglycans, growth factors | Level 3 Level 4 Level 6a |
Wound management solution for irregular, tunneled, or undermined wounds; applied as either a powder or paste; the particulate solution provides intimate contact with all areas of the wound bed | Treat esophagojejunal anastomotic leaks; vesicovaginal fistula; deep partial thickness burns and wounds; esophageal stenosis; seal surgical sites and prevent leakage. | Induces a host-derived tissue remodeling response; stimulates neovascularization through a number of growth factors and functional proteins such as collagen, laminin, and elastin; inflammatory reactions are uncommon, given the acellular, inert nature of urinary bladder matrix | Use in deep partial-thickness burns enabled healing by 29 days on average without requiring autografts; 75% of cases of vesicovaginal fistula treated with MatriStem had no fistula drainage and progressed to full healing; an alternative for the treatment of esophageal stenosis is presented, which uses a biological scaffold and an innovative surgical procedure where all patients had a favorable clinical outcome with immediate recovery from the procedure and reinstated oral intake after 7 days | 335–340 |
| CollaPlug ■ Zimmer Biomet |
Type I/III bovine collagen absorbable non-friable sponge | Level 3 Level 5 Level 7b |
Material to help promote clotting | Control bleeding and stabilize blood clots as well as protect the wound bed while accelerating the healing process. | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that CollaPlug enhances clot formation and accelerates formation of granulation tissue while it absorbs up to 60 times dressing weight in fluids. | Effective local hemostatic material following minor oral surgery in patients under oral anticoagulant therapy; also shows acceleration of soft tissue healing and reduce postoperative pain | 341–345 |
| CopiOs Bone Void Filler □ ZimVie |
Calcium phosphate, dibasic (DICAL) and purified type 1 bovine collagen | Level 3 Level 6b Level 7a Level 7b |
Synthetic bone graft material consisting of mineralized, lyophilized collagen that has been formed into sponges of various sizes for surgical implantation. | Used for bone grafting and rigid fixation techniques for stabilizing bone voids | During the remodeling process CopiOs Bone Void Filler act as a scaffold that provides a moderately acidic environment that promotes solubility of osteoinductive growth factors for new bone formation. CopiOs promotes aerobic glycolysis and proliferation in cells seeded within its collagen matrix. Seeded cells have fast calcium release and high levels of p38 and ERK phosphorylation, suggesting that CopiOs promotes activation of these pathways. | Patients undergoing spinal fusion with CopiOs bone void filler was used showed a decrease in the volume of bony void at 3- and 6-month follow ups, with no pain reported. | 346–349 |
| Cutimed Epiona □ Essity |
90% native bovine collagen, 10% calcium-sodium alginate | Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 |
Mimics the function of a healthy dermis and boosts the wound healing process; eliminates harmful factors by binding MMPs; enhanced granulation by promoting cell growth | Easy to combine with your current therapies (e.g., compression therapy); broad indication for treatment of all wounds healing by secondary intention, free of necrotic tissue; can be folded or rolled up depending on wound type (deep wounds); indicated for diabetic foot ulcers, donor sites, pressure injuries, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, venous leg ulcers | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that contact with wound exudate rehydrates Cutimed Epiona to a gelatinous form that keeps wound environment moist; binds and inhibits MMPs and reduces inflammation | Patients exhibited a decrease and wound exudate and wound area after 3 weeks of treatment with no infection or adverse events reported | 350–353 |
| INSPIRIS RESILIA ■ Edwards Lifesciences |
Aortic valve, treated bovine pericardium | Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 |
Improves heart valve replacement safety and efficacy; significant improvement in calcium-blocking properties | Indicated for aortic valve replacement | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that stable-capping permanently blocks free aldehydes to prevent calcium binding within the tissue | Patients showed a reduction of transvalvular pressure gradients and lower trans-prosthetic pressure gradients | 354–358 |
| Integra Bilayer Matrix Wound Dressing (IBWMD) □ Integra LifeSciences |
Bovine type I collagen/chondroitin-6-sulfate sponge with thin silicone layer on the epidermal surface | Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 |
Controlled pore size, porosity and degradation rate of the sponge enables cells to infiltrate, proliferate, and aid in the healing process; the semi-permeable silicone layer provides epidermal-like protection and moisture control | Support the management of wounds including: partial and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, and draining wounds; not indicated for third degree burns | Facilitates neodermal reconstruction with regenerative rather than inflammatory healing; fibroblasts infiltrate by day 7, myofibroblasts infiltrate by week 3 and deposit collagen, by week 4 native collagen replaces Integra collagen and becomes fully vascularized; following vascularization, silicone cover is removed; can provide antibiotic delivery | IBWM demonstrated progressive DFU wound healing, with 95% mean wound reduction at 12 week; complete wound closure was achieved by 70% of patients after 12 weeks; no recurrences were observed at follow-up | 359–364 |
| Integra Wound Matrix □ Integra LifeSciences |
Bovine type I collagen/chondroitin-6-sulfate sponge | Level 3 Level 4 |
Controlled pore size, porosity, and degradation rate enables cells to infiltrate, proliferate, and aid in the healing process | Support the management of wounds including: partial and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, tunneled/undermined wounds, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, and draining wounds; not indicated for third degree burns | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims IWM is an effective method to treat deep skin defects in elderly multimorbid patients with deep facial wounds by promoting dermal regeneration | IWM resulted in favorable take rates, functional and early cosmetic outcomes in deep facial wounds; all but one graft had complete take without any complication, whereas one graft had partial graft loss (30%); all defects showed significant shrinkage of 61% | 365–369 |
| KollaGen II Simple Supplements |
Avian sternal collagen type II hydrolysate | Level 3 | Nutritional supplement to reduce symptoms of joint damage | A dietary supplement that may be beneficial for patients suffering from degenerative joint diseases, including cartilage injuries, connective tissue disorders, polychondritis, joint defects, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis | Some orally administered collagen type II hydrolysate-derived peptides are absorbed by the intestine and are circulated in the blood stream to eventually reach cartilage tissue and, possibly, activate collagen biosynthesis in chondrocytes to alleviate joint pain | Administration of 2,000 mg/day of collagen type II hydrolysate for 60 days improved essential symptoms in individuals suffering from joint diseases, including the range of motion, general pain, and muscle strength | 370 |
| SkinTemp II □ Human BioSciences |
Collagen sheets; 100% nonhydrolyzed type 1 bovine native collagen | Level 3 Level 5 Level 7b |
Kollagen technology process protects and retains significantly more native triple helical protein structure, thus allowing superior stability of the molecule and scaffolding through all four phases of wound healing | Management of burns, scrapes, blisters, sores, ulcers, acute and chronic wounds, superficial, partial- and full-thickness wounds, infected and noninfected wounds, and minimal to heavily exudating wounds | Triple helical structure is more stable, having high tensile modulus in wound environment, providing scaffold to chemotactically attract and guide fibroblast migration for collagen deposition and improved wound healing | Type I bovine collagen matrix provided a safe, readily available alternative to traditional methods of second intention healing; it minimized wound care while reducing the time for complete healing | 371–374 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 3 = clinical studies—observational/mechanism of action (MoA); Level 4 = historical cohort (retrospective) or case-control studies (retrospective with control group); Level 5 = other clinical studies (case series or studies as reference treatment, human ex vivo MoA); Level 6a = large animal with MoA; Level 6b = large animal observational; Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro. FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
Dental applications
Collagen membranes and graft materials are used in oral surgery, particularly for periodontal regeneration and guided bone regeneration (Fig. 2). Periodontal disease, or gum disease, commonly refers to inflammatory disorders ranging from mild reversible gingivitis to the more severe irreversible periodontitis gum infection that causes loss of connective tissue and bone support, often leading to tooth loss.500 Beyond causes such as plaque buildup, periodontal disease has been defined as a systemic disease associated with a host of other morbidities.501 Severe periodontitis reached a prevalence of 23.6% in dentate adults in 2020, which is striking when considering that periodontitis is the medical basis for roughly 25–38% of tooth extractions.502 To promote better healing and recovery following dental surgery procedures, researchers have been developing collagen-based materials that promote clotting, tissue regeneration, and bone preservation. The use of bioabsorbable collagen membranes in periodontal regeneration procedures also prevents the need for membrane removal surgery while also limiting the risks of bacterial colonization.503
An absorbable porous collagen sponge material (CollaCote) is beneficial as a collagen-based product that can be packed into a root canal space following debridement, along with a barrier of mineral trioxide aggregates (Table 2). This collagen matrix is fully absorbed in 10–12 days and promotes obturation, or closure, of the canal space through host cell migration and osteoinductivity into homogeneously spaced micropores.246,247 After tooth extraction, applying a biodegradable collagen plug (CollaPlug) before socket suturing has been shown to reduce postoperative bleeding and pain. The plug acts as a hemostatic material by absorbing fluids, enhancing clot formation, and accelerating granulation tissue development.341 The same collagen plug has demonstrated, with the addition of platelet rich fibrin, that it contributes to alveolar ridge preservation in extraction sockets, preserving bone width for up to 4 months.342 Animal studies have shown that fibrillar collagen (CollaTape) promotes early phases of bone healing through osteoblast surface fibronectin-mediated adhesion and collagen-driven angiogenesis.248 This effect was limited by the degradation of collagen dressing within 5 weeks of application. Longer-term ridge preservation could be achieved by adding synthetic bone particles to the extraction socket prior to closing the wound with collagen dressing.
Table 2.
Level of evidence 2
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArteGraft ■ LeMaitre Vascular |
Acellular collagen vascular graft of bovine origin | Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6a |
Long-term durability and secondary patency rates; easy surgical handling and suturability; strong collagen matrix that retains the original artery cross weave | Intended for use distal to the aorta as a segmental arterial replacement, as an arterial bypass, as an arteriovenous shunt where more conventional methods have proven inadequate, or as an arterial patch graft | ArteGraft is simply to serve as a substitute conduit for blood where bypass or replacement of occluded/diseased arterial segments is required, or to establish a conduit for hemodialysis | Conformity to the applicable requirements and confirmed that the subject device is safe and performs as intended and claimed; is a state-of-the-art device for use for vascular access or in vascular bypass or repair; limb salvage rate at one year was 83.6% and at five years was 86.2% for patients with critical limb ischemia | 231–236 |
| Collagen meniscus implant (CMI) ■ Stryker |
99% tendon-derived type I bovine collagen; small quantities of GAGs: chondroitin sulfate, sodium hyaluronate | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7b |
CMI implant reinforces soft tissue and provides a resorbable scaffold that is replaced by the patient’s own soft tissue; is not a prosthetic device and is not intended to replace normal body structure | Designed to function as an absorbable template to facilitate host meniscus tissue regeneration in patients who have an irreparable meniscus tear or loss of meniscus tissue, ACL reconstruction, knee realignment, chondral resurfacing | The CMI meniscus tissue implant is slowly absorbed and replaced by patient’s native collagen tissue; can be preseeded with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or meniscus cells before implantation | One year after implantation, hybrid fibrous and meniscus-like fibrochondrocytic matrix have been identified within the collagen implant suggesting its potential to integrate with host tissue; at that time, remnants of the CMI may be present in 10% to 25% of cases; improves short-term outcomes, but tissue deposition is limited and (partial) resorption occurs in several years | 237–240 |
| ColActive Plus an Colactive Plus AG Hartmann USA |
Collagen, sodium alginate, EDTA carboxymethyl cellulose, silver chloride | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7b |
Dressing maintains a moist wound environment at the wound surface that aids in the formation of granulation tissue and epithelialization; silver chloride provides an effective broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity; helps remove zinc to inhibit matrixins | Management of full- and partial-thickness wounds including: pressure injuries, diabetic ulcers, ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies, venous ulcers, donor and graft sites, abrasions, traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention, dehisced surgical wounds, first-, and second-degree burns | Gelatin sheet that directly contacts with wound and exudates; the dressing maintains a moist wound environment at the wound surface that aids in the formation of granulation tissue and epithelialization; EDTA inhibits MMPs; carboxymethyl cellulose and alginate maintain moist wound environment and activate silver ion; antimicrobial silver chloride disrupts bacterial metabolic cycle | The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze | 221,241–245 |
| CollaCote ■ Zimmer Biomet |
Porous, nonfriable collagen sponge; type1 bovine collagen | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7a level 7b |
Aids in wound closure and controls bleeding in palatal donor sites, mucosal flaps; provides matrix for tissue ingrowth | Intended for surgical wounds, periodontal surgical wounds, extraction sites, dental sores, oral ulcers (noninfected or viral), suture sites, burns, traumatic wounds; being used to treat bone defects associated with endodontic treatment complications | Host cell migration from surrounding tissue, osteoinductivity, mediated by collagen structure and homogeneously distributed micropores; absorbs and regulates bleeding and blood clots while also protecting the wound site and promoting healing | CollaCote significantly accelerated palatal wound healing and reduce the patient’s pain and discomfort | 246–251,252 |
| CollaGraft ■ Zimmer Biomet |
Porous beads; 60% hydroxyapatite and 40% tricalcium phosphate ceramic, fibrillar type I bovine collagen | Level 2 Level 4 Level 6b Level 7a |
Bridges segmental long bone defects | Treatment of acute long bone fractures and traumatic osseous defects with bone marrow and rigid fixation; can impregnated with antibiotics | Hydroxyapatite provides a slightly resorbable scaffold to facilitate new bone ingrowth and calcification; tricalcium phosphate is a resorbable component that binds bone material; these components together provide a biodegradable osteoconductive scaffold that promotes new bone ingrowth and remodeling while preserving mechanical strength; can be used with autogenous bone marrow for treating long fractures | Showed the same efficacy as autogenous iliac graft in the treatment of acute long bone fractures over 6–12 months; CollaGraft with bone marrow: at 21 days, new woven bone and osteoblasts were seen in contact with both the collagen and hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate components; newly formed bone ossicles were observed in association with the collagen component | 253–259 |
| CosmoDerm □ Abbvie | Human-based collagen | Level 2 Level 4 Level 5 | Replenish skin’s lost collagen | Injected into the superficial papillary dermis for correction of soft tissue contour deficiencies, such as wrinkles and acne scars | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims it is an injectable dermal filler formulated for fine line wrinkles and facial contour defects. | Resulting nonsevere adverse event rate of 33.3% for CosmoDerm (1/3 injections) | 260–262 |
| CosmoPlast □ Abbvie |
Human-based collagen crosslinked with glutaraldehyde | Level 2 Level 5 Level 6b |
Improves facial appearance by smoothing wrinkles and folds | Injected into the mid to deep dermis for correction of soft tissue contour deficiencies, such as wrinkles and acne scars. | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims it is an injectable dermal filler formulated for fine line wrinkles and facial contour defects. | Treatment of mid to deep dermal defects lasts for 4–7 months) | 263–267 |
| DermACell ■ LifeNet Health |
Acellular human-derived dermal matrix that is decellularized, removing donor DNA, and retains native growth factors, collagen, and elastin | Level 2 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a |
Matracell removes a minimum of 97% of donor DNA, allowing for rapid cellular infiltration and re-vascularization in wound healing | Treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers | Matracell removal of donor DNA allows for rapid cellular infiltration and revascularization; CD31 positive cell infiltration and vessel formation by day 7; high levels of fibroblast and blood vessel infiltration suggest DermACELL tissue incorporates into the host tissue | Significantly higher percentage of completely healed ulcers by the 16-week follow-up compared to the conventional care group | 98–100,268–271 |
| Dermagraft ■ Organogenesis |
Three-dimensional polymer scaffold containing metabolically active human fibroblasts that secrete collagen, other ECM proteins, growth factors, and cytokines | Level 2 Level 3 Level 7a Level 7b |
Diabetic foot ulcer treatment composed of fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, and a bioabsorbable scaffold. | Treatment of full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers greater than six weeks duration which extend through the dermis, but without tendon, muscle, joint capsule, or bone exposure. Indications beyond DFUs, include the treatment of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, chronic surgical wounds, and wound dehiscence after amputations. | During manufacturing, human fibroblasts proliferate to fill the interstices of this polyglactin mesh scaffold and secrete collagen, other ECM proteins, growth factors, and cytokines; remains metabolically active following wound bed implantation | At 12 weeks after initiation of therapy, Dermagraft treatment led to a 64% increase in the proportion of patients exhibiting complete wound closure when compared with patients receiving conventional therapy | 272–278 |
| Evolence ■ Johnson and Johnson |
Collagen filler; 3.5% type 1 fibrillar porcine collagen crosslinked with d-ribose | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7a |
Reduces wrinkles and facial folds; less immunogenic than bovine collagen | Injectable product indicated for the correction of moderate to deep facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds | Glymatrix crosslinking technology improves clinical persistence by providing resistance to collagenolytic degradation; fibroblast infiltrates colonize the matrix and secrete new collagen; areas of new collagen deposition become vascularized and, after 12–24 months, become integrated in the dermis | 6 months post-OCR visit, 91.2% of subjects continued to rate the nasolabial fold treated with Evolence as “better” or “much better” than pretreatment; no hypersensitivity reported; maintained durability for 18 months on average | 279–282 |
| Fibracol Plus □ Johnson & Johnson |
Collagen wound dressing with alginate; 90% collagen, 10% calcium alginate | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7a Level 7b |
Structural support of collagen with the exudate management of alginate; absorbent alginate composition helps maintain a moist wound environment conducive to granulation tissue formation and epithelialization | Management of exuding wounds including: full- and partial-thickness wounds; pressure injuries; venous ulcers; ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies; diabetic ulcers; donor sites and other bleeding surface wounds; traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention; dehisced surgical incisions; pack into deep wounds | Alginate supports a moist wound environment; collagen component promotes cellular and vascular in-growth, as well as fibroblast proliferation, resulting in granulation tissue and neoepithelialization at the wound site | 75 foot ulcer patients; 81% wound area reduction (61% control group); complete wound healing outcomes in 48% patients (compared with 36% in the control group) | 220,283–286 |
| Gintuit ■ Organogenesis Inc. |
Allogeneic cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts in bovine collagen | Level 2 Level 3 |
Secretes human growth factors and cytokines and contains extracellular matrix proteins; these factors are known to be involved in wound repair and regeneration. | Indicated for topical (nonsubmerged) application to a surgically created vascular wound bed in the treatment of mucogingival conditions in adults | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Gintuit grafting over vascular wound beds creates color and texture matched tissue for treating mucogingival conditions, without providing root coverage | Evaluated in two clinical studies in adults with insufficient gingival tissue; in each of the two studies, Gintuit was associated with an increase of at least 2 mm of gingival tissue in at least 50% of the study subjects | 287–289 |
| Grafix □ Smith & Nephew |
Human placental membrane allograft; ECM (collagen, elastin, laminin, fibronectin), mesenchymal stem cells, and growth factors | Level 2 Level 4 Level 5 |
Includes MSCs in the collagen-rich ECM to enhance and improve wound healing in the clinical setting | Wound cover that can be used for the treatment of both acute and chronic wounds, including but not limited to DFUs, VLUs, pressure ulcers, burns, surgical incisions and dehiscence, pyoderma gangrenosum, and epidermolysis bullosa | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims National Institute for Health and Care Excellence found Grafix to have the highest overall effect with “no serious risk of bias.” Cryopreservation resulted in 80% cell viability within membrane post-thaw; cells and growth factors are integral components of the membrane ECM, where MSCs were presumed to have most beneficial effects in wound healing in elderly patients. |
Complete wound closure at 12 weeks in 62% of the patients with chronic DFU | 290–295 |
| GraftJacket ■ Stryker |
Cadaveric skin collagen-based allograft; allogeneic cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts in bovine collagen; elastin, collagen, hyaluronan, fibronectin, blood vessel channels | Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6b |
GraftJacket can be used to provide supplemental support, protection, and reinforcement of tendon and ligamentous tissues, or other homologous use | Repair or replacement of damaged or inadequate integumental tissue, such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, or for other homologous uses of human integument; rotator cuff injuries; Achilles tendon repair | Acellular scaffold promotes new cellular in-growth that developed a remodeled tendon-like structure 6 months postsurgery; acellularity makes graft less immunogenic; intact collagen ECM strengthens graft; intact blood vessel channels support revascularization and cellular infiltration to promote graft healing | Acellular human dermal matrix augmentation of large (>3 cm) cuff tears involving 2 tendons showed better ASES and Constant scores and more frequent intact cuffs as determined by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); intact repairs were found in 85% of the augmented group and 40% of the nonaugmented group; no adverse events related to the acellular human dermal matrix were observed | 296–299 |
| NeuraGen Nerve Guide □ Integra LifeSciences |
Nerve conduit; bovine type 1 collagen tube | Level 2 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a Level 7b |
Biocompatible ultra-pure collagen that allows for controlled resorption; the conduit’s precisely engineered porosity supports natural nerve regeneration by allowing nerve growth factors and Schwann cells to infiltrate | Indicated for the repair of peripheral nerve discontinuities where gap closure can be achieved by flexion of the extremity. | Provides a protective environment across nerve discontinuities, as well as an isolated conduit environment guiding axonal regrowth; has been used safely as a nerve graft seeded with MSCs to further promote motor nerve regeneration | Recovery of sensory and motor functions using collagen conduits was equivalent to direct suture at 24 months after repair when nerve gap inside tube was 6 mm or less; NeuraGen conduit repair also resulted in 40% less time in or than direct suture-repair | 300–304 |
| NuShield Organogenesis Inc. |
Dehydrated human placental allograft with growth factors, ECM proteins (collagen type I, III, and high levels of IV, V, and VI), elastin, glycoproteins, proteoglycans including hyaluronic acid, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate | Level 2 Level 5 Level 7b |
Acts as an adjunct to soft tissue healing with excellent regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenic properties | Direct application in wrapping or suturing around tendons; on-lay graft to protect tendons, nerves, spine adhesions and fibrosis, acute and chronic wounds | Cytokines and growth factors (EGF, PDGF, transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β], bFGF) released from graft are chemotactic for keratinocytes and fibroblasts, promoting migration and proliferation; paracrine signaling following exposure to NuShield results in expression changes in keratinocytes and fibroblasts for genes that are mitogenic, regulate inflammation, or regulate proliferation | 48% greater probability of wound closure in favor of the dACM (NuShield) group | 305–309 |
| Permacol □ Medtronic |
Crosslinked porcine dermal collagen surgical mesh | Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7a |
Combining the tensile strength of synthetic hernia repair materials with the biocompatibility of an acellular porcine dermal implant; surgical implant delivers proven durability and strength for ventral hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction | Support and reinforce soft tissue in surgical procedures including rectal intussusception, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and abdominal wall hernia repair | Crosslinking is introduced into the structure, making it resistant to the collagenase enzymes responsible for the breakdown and resorption of implanted collagen; crosslinking also protects against bacterial degradation; postimplantation there is an acute inflammatory response that facilitates infiltration and healing; angiogenesis produces capillary ingrowth; implant gradually becomes permanently incorporated into the tissue with well-organized collagen and skeletal muscle | Permacol mesh in BioLIFT is feasible and achieves a high primary healing rate of 80%; trend of lower recurrence rates than competitors | 310–319 |
| PriMatrix and PriMatrix Ag Dermal Repair Scaffold □ Integra LifeSciences |
Acellular fetal bovine dermis sheet; type III collagen; PriMatrix Ag contains silver | Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7b |
Provides an environment that supports cellular repopulation and revascularization; the silver in PriMatrix Ag is intended to prevent microbial colonization of the device | Indicated for management of wounds including: partial and full thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, second-degree burns, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, tunneled/undermined wounds, and draining wounds; not indicated for third degree burns | Has biocompatibility as well as the ability to trap and bind the patient’s own cells and growth factors within the porous matrix at the time of surgery; implants trigger an initial inflammatory cell infiltrate followed by migration of mesenchymal cells and neovascularization; progressive remodeling by host cell infiltrates replaces graft tissue with histologically normal-appearing host tissue | In a prospective multicenter study, 76% of patients treated with PriMatrix for management of diabetic foot ulcers achieved closure by 12 weeks; a retrospective case series of 43 consecutive partial- or full-thickness wounds treated with either PriMatrix or PriMatrix with negative pressure wound therapy showed that 88.3% of cases achieved wound closure through re-epithelialization of the dermal scaffold | 320–329 |
| Promogran Prisma □ Johnson & Johnson |
55% collagen, 44% ORC, 1% silver with 25% w/w ionically bound silver (Promogran ORC +Ag) | Level 2 Level 4 Level 5 Level 7b |
In the presence of exudate, matrix transforms into a soft, confirmable, biodegradable gel, and thus allows contact with all areas of the wound; the dressing helps create a moist wound bed and an environment that supports wound healing; addition of silver provides antibiosis to chronic wounds | Indicated for the management of exuding wounds including: pressure injuries, diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies, partial- and full-thickness wounds, donor sites and other bleeding surface wounds, abrasions, traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention, and dehisced surgical wounds | Reduces MMPs and free radicals in wounds; removes excess metal ions; protects growth factors and proteins that promote wound healing and tissue formation | Randomized controlled trial demonstrated that collagen/ORC/silver treatment significantly increased healing compared with the control treatment, using healing criteria of 50% reduction in wound area by week 4 | 330–334 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 2 = 1 well-designed RCT/multi-site study; Level 3 = clinical studies—observational/mechanism of action (MoA); Level 4 = historical cohort (retrospective) or case-control studies (retrospective with control group); Level 5 = other clinical studies (case series or studies as reference treatment, human ex vivo MoA); Level 6a = large animal with MoA; Level 6b = large animal observational; Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro.FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
Other collagen products used in oral surgery are applied to cover socket void fillers as a membranous sheet. For example, a non-crosslinked bilayer collagen membrane osteophilic matrix (Bio-Gide) has a film layer designed to prevent soft tissue invasion into the socket, thus promoting alveolar ridge preservation and bone regeneration.133,504 A comparable product with a sugar crosslinked collagen membrane (Ossix Plus) prevented host cell infiltration409 (Tables 1, 5). The noncrosslinked structure of collagen membranes (Bio-Gide) promoted angiogenesis and vascularization in the wound; whereas cross-linked collagen membranes (Ossix Plus) were not permissive for angiogenesis, yet still allowed nutrient permeation.410 Filling extraction sockets with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and 10% porcine type 1 collagen (Bio-Oss) prior to sealing with extraction sockets with noncrosslinked bilayer collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) significantly improved bone height and width preservation for 6 months postextraction.133 The use of collagen products singly, or in combination, can preserve alveolar bone which otherwise would undergo the healing-induced remodeling and volumetric loss of socket contour post-tooth extraction.133 Thus, use of these collagen products may preserve alveolar ridge necessary for subsequent dental implants without the need for additional bone grafting.
Table 5.
Level of evidence 5
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biostep and Biostep AG □ Smith & Nephew |
Semi-denatured cross-linked porcine collagen, EDTA, alginate, silver, carboxylmethylcellulose (CMC) | Level 5 | Collagen binds excess MMPs while EDTA irreversibly deactivates MMPs; alginate component to absorb a high level of moisture; antibacterial activity of silver to help maintain bacterial balance for contaminated and colonized wounds | Management of full-thickness and partial-thickness acute and chronic wounds including: pressure injuries, diabetic ulcers, ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies, venous ulcers, first-, and second-degree burns, donor/graft sites, abrasions, dehisced surgical wounds, and traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention | Crosslinked collagen attracts MMPs so the dressing, and not native collagen, is degraded; EDTA binds zinc to deactivate MMPs; antimicrobial activity of silver ions to inhibit microbial ingress of the dressing and maintain bacterial balance; maximum surface area of collagen dressing, CMC, and physiological pH allows maximum exudate absorption and promotes wound healing | Enhanced granulation, tissue regeneration, and epithelialization were achieved within a relatively short time period (1–2 weeks); a patient presented with a lateral malleolus ulcer secondary to minor trauma that had failed to respond to 4 weeks of conventional wound care. Biostep dressing was applied, and the wound had nearly closed by 21 days of treatment. | 389–391 |
| CollaTape ■ Zimmer Biomet |
Type 1 bovine tendon-derived collagen | Level 5 Level 7b |
Control bleeding and stabilize blood clots as well as protect the wound bed while accelerating the healing process; porous, absorbable matrix supports delicate new tissue | Intended for localized ridge defects, socket grafting, oral ulcers (noninfected or viral), periodontal surgical wounds, burns | Rough surface, hydrophilicity, and sponge-like structure of collagen promotes osteoblast adhesion, mediated by osteoblast surface fibronectin; newly remodeled bone mass has been mainly attributed to type I collagen-driven angiogenesis; long term ridge preservation following tooth extraction is limited due to Collatape degradation within 5 weeks | Membrane permitted palatal fibroblast and epithelial cell adhesion, proliferation, and distribution which led to formation of mucosa-like tissue | 248,392–395 |
| Endoform □ Aroa Biosurgery, Ltd. |
Natural dermal template; 90% intact native collagen, 10% ECM components: ovine forestomach, collagen type I, III, IV, elastin, GAGs, proteoglycans, FGF, laminin, fibronectin | Level 5 Level 7b |
Rehydrated with exudate or sterile saline, the dermal template transforms into a soft conforming sheet, which is naturally incorporated into the wound over time; retains the native extracellular matrix-associated macromolecules, including fibronectin, glycosaminoglycans, laminin, and elastin; broad-spectrum MMP reduction | Intended for Hidradenitis suppurativa-chronic inflammatory skin disease, pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, surgical wounds, tunneling, and traumatic wounds | Provides a natural porous bioscaffold for rapid cell infiltration while reducing excess MMP; contains >150 ECM proteins and residual vascular channels to support the establishment of new vasculature | Wound dimensions decreased in 21 of 24 wounds, including patients with multiple comorbidities | 396–398 |
| FACIALGAIN Sunmax Biotechnology |
Crosslinked porcine collagen implant with lidocane | Level 5 Level 6b |
Crosslinked porcine collagen dermal filler injections can serve as a minimally invasive approach to enhance skin laxity | Dermal filler injections for treating dermatochalasis and periorbital hyperpigmentation; collagen implants for dermal contour correction. | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims glutaraldehyde cross-linking of collagen fibers increases the product stability and mechanical properties, while lidocaine is added to mitigate pain | Tissue in-growth was observed in the RPC constructs along with neovascularization and granulation tissue; at the 6-month time point, the RPC implant material blended somewhat imperceptibly with native, pre-existent collagen and accurate reaction zone measurements of the implant and associated host tissue response could not be made | 399–402 |
| Gentrix Surgical Matrix □ Integra LifeSciences |
Porcine UBM sheet | Level 5 Level 6a Level 6b |
Provides mechanical reinforcement; facilitates the body’s ability to remodel site-appropriate tissue | Implantation to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in patients requiring gastroenterological or plastic, reconstructive and urological surgery; some Gentrix devices are indicated to minimize tissue attachment to the device in case of direct contact with viscera | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Gentrix devices maintain an intact epithelial basement membrane and facilitates the body’s ability to remodel site-appropriate tissue | Retrospective case series of 64 patients who underwent complex ventral incisional hernia repairs (55% retrorectus and 44% intraperitoneal) reinforced with UBM; at the 36-month follow-up, there was a 15.6% recurrence rate and no cases of erosion, fistula formation, or need for mesh explantation; three patients had a full-thickness fascial biopsy which showed functional remodeling of site-appropriate connective tissue | 403–408 |
| Ossix Plus □ Dentsply Sirona |
Porcine-derived type 1 collagen-based sugar cross-linked membrane | Level 5 Level 6a Level 7a Level 7b |
Provides true barrier effect for 4–6 months, ossifies and contributes to improved long-term outcomes | Intended for use during the process of guided bone regeneration (GBR) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) as a biodegradable barrier for: ridge augmentation for later implant insertions; simultaneous ridge augmentation and implant insertions; ridge augmentation around implants inserted in extraction sites; alveolar ridge preservation consequent to tooth extractions; over the window in lateral window sinus elevation procedure; implants with vertical bone loss due to infection, only in cases where satisfactory debridement and implant surface disinfection can be achieved; intra bony defects around teeth; treatment of recession defects, together with coronally positioned flap; in furcation defects in multi-rooted teeth | Promotes mineralized tissue formation around the site of implants; high cellular barrier function of cross-linked collagen and pepsin treatment (prevents host cell infiltration and reduces inflammation; membrane is still permissible for nutrient permeation | Membrane-protected site had formation of well-mineralized tissue at 12 weeks following exodontia, with minimal changes in alveolar ridge dimensions and no signs of membrane ossification | 409–413 |
| PSDV □ Baxter International Inc. |
Peri-strip dry staple (PSD) line reinforcement with Veritas collagen matrix; dehydrated bovine pericardium vascular patch | Level 5 | Increase the strength of staple-lines and/or reduce the risk of bleeding | Prosthesis for the surgical repair of soft tissue deficiencies using surgical staplers when staple line reinforcement is needed, including laparoscopic gastric bypass | Differs from traditional PSDs in that it is not crosslinked with glutaraldehyde; acellular collagen matrix promotes host fibroblast infiltration and capillary ingrowth; remodeling of this nonpermanent staple line buttress renders it indistinguishable from host tissues | The median duration of air leaks and median drainage time was significantly shorter in the PSDV group | 151,414,415 |
| Puracol □ Medline |
Collagen wound dressing; 100% type 1 collagen with a high degree of nativity | Level 5 Level 7b |
Jump-starts the wound healing process, making it ideal for wounds that are chronic or stalled; high gel integrity | Ideal for pressure, venous, diabetic ulcers, partial- and full-thickness wounds, ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies, burns, donor sites, and other surface wounds, scalp reconstruction, abrasions, traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention and dehisced surgical wounds | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Puracol retains triple-helix structural stability that persists in contact with liquid and aids in wound bed preparation for subsequent skin substitute; fragile collagen laminas within Puracol are reduced to thin collagen fibrils cross-linking wider collagen bundles of fibers, possibly making them inaccessible to collagenase; interaction with lymphocytes showed no appreciable difference in collagen matrix, contributing to matrix resilience during host cell infiltration; porosity of 80% promotes host cell infiltration and adhesion, which aids in wound healing | Can be tethered to antimicrobial peptides (AMP); collagen-tethering of AMPs without the harmful side effects of current approaches (e.g., bacterial resistance, general toxicity, scarring) and utilizing their wound healing functionality have important implications for the future of tethered AMPs | 221,416,417 |
| Puracol Plus and Puracol Plus Ag □ Medline |
Collagen dressing with microscaffold; 100% type I native bovine collagen; Puracol Plus Ag+ contains hydrated silver chloride | Level 5 Level 7b |
Helps jump-start stalled or chronic wounds when antimicrobial properties of silver are desired and help promote natural healing; Puracol Plus Ag+ silver adds antimicrobial properties | Indicated for pressure, venous, diabetic ulcers, partial- and full-thickness wounds, ulcers caused by mixed vascular etiologies, first- and second-degree burns, donor sites and other surface wounds, abrasions, traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention, and dehisced surgical wounds; solution for tunneling wounds that are difficult to dress because of the tendency of nonbiodegradable dressing materials to be retained in the wound even after their attempted removal | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Puracol Plus retains triple-helix structural stability that persists in contact with liquid and aids in wound bed preparation for subsequent skin substitute; triple helix collagen structure binds MMPs, resolving inflammation and supporting proliferation; hydrated silver chloride provides antibacterial properties | Increased rates of healing were found in the xenograft-treated (Puracol Plus) wounds as compared with previous studies of calvarium-exposed wounds healed by second intention alone; advantages of animal-derived collagen xenografts include immediate coverage of the wound, simple application, low cost, and avoidance of the morbidity associated with local flap, graft, and free flap repairs | 221,341,418,419 |
| RCM6 (resorbable collagen membrane) ■ ACE Surgical Supply |
Tendon-derived type 1 bovine collagen; formaldehyde crosslinking | Level 5 Level 7a |
Guides healing and regeneration of bone and surrounding tissue | Intended to aid in the wound-healing process of surgical procedures such as dental implants, bone and periodontal defects, and ridge augmentation | When used in conjunction with a bone-grafting particulate, it helps mitigate the migration of the particulate from the surgical site; fully resorbable with a resorption time of up to 6 months; integration of membrane by proliferating soft tissue, stabilization of blood clot, and host cell adhesion to membrane promote soft tissue healing | RCM6 remnants were seen in the biopsy specimen, an expected observation given that the reported resorption time is 6 months or more | 420–423 |
| Simpurity □ SNS Medical |
Wound dressing collagen particles; 100% nonbleached, native undigested bovine collagen (Sold in combination packet: Total Wound Care Solution System [TWCSS] for clinical use) | Level 5 | Flexible application for wounds of different sizes and shapes; medical grade, lyophilized bovine collagen is a clean, white powder; reduces inflammation and supports tissue healing; can be used as a hemostatic dressing | Medical-grade bovine collagen comes in a clean, white powder form, making it easy to apply directly to wounds; collagen powder helps reduce inflammation and supports the healing process by providing a substrate that diverts matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) digestion away from healing tissues; can be used as a hemostatic dressing to control bleeding. | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims the porous structure provides excellent absorption and scaffolding for cell proliferation and migration | Improved wound healing in patients with chronic recalcitrant wounds, infected wounds, and comorbidities | 424 |
| Stimulen □ Southwest Technologies Inc. |
Collagen gel wound dressing; 52% collagen of long and short polypeptides along with glycerin, water, fragrance | Level 5 Level 6a Level 7a |
Can be used in emergency situations not only to cover a wound but also to fill cavity wounds; gel is convenient to use, especially in places that are difficult to apply the powder form, such as the bottom of a foot | Intended for partial and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, donor sites and other bleeding surface wounds, abrasions, trauma wounds, and first- and second-degree burns | Serves as a substrate for high MMPs in chronic wound environment; induces polarization of healing-like macrophages in the wound, which produce anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic responses and promote wound healing | On day 7, histological analysis showed significant increase in the length of rete ridges, suggesting improved biomechanical properties of the healing wound tissue; modified collagen gel significantly accelerated neutrophil and macrophage recruitment to the wound site on day 3 and day 7 with successful resolution of inflammation on day 21 | 33–35,425 |
| Stimulen Powder □ Southwest Technologies Inc. |
Collagen powder; hydrolyzed modified collagens, prepared polypeptides | Level 5 | When sprinkled in the wound, it interacts with exudate to form a protective gel on the wound bed; gel protects new cells and tissue from dehydration; nonadherent; does not need to be removed from the wound site; the collagen powder is readily broken down by the natural enzymes present in most wound fluids | Management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure injuries (stages I–IV), venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, partial-thickness burns, acute wounds, abrasions, traumatic wounds healing by secondary intention, and donor sites and other surface wounds | Forms a protective gel on the wound bed that prevents dehydration and provides a scaffolding to promotes cell proliferation and ECM deposition; hydrolyzed collagen forms a better hydrogel with peptides that promotes chemotactic signaling for host cell infiltration | Application of Stimulen collagen powder (applied once daily after wound cleansing) further supported tissue regeneration by providing a scaffold for cell growth and matrix deposition | 426,427 |
| Vergenix FG CollPlant Biotechnologies |
Soft-tissue repair device; flowable gel; plant-derived recombinant human type I collagen (rhCollagen) | Level 5 Level 7b |
Provides complete coverage, managing wound closure, offers a nonallergenic and a pathogen-free scaffold for safe and successful wound management | Chronic diabetic and venous wounds, pressure ulcers, traumatic injuries, and surgical wounds | Plant-derived human collagen. Scaffolds support primary human cell attachment and proliferation at an equivalent or higher level than bovine material; mixing with saline forms a collagen-fibrin matrix that enhances cell migration and tissue repair; promotes keratinocyte migration and proliferation that coincide with re-epithelialization; inflammation increased at day 1 and decreased by day 6, the induction and resolution of which helps drive the healing process | After 2 weeks of treatment, wound dehiscence was replaced with granulation tissue, and after 4 weeks, the patient was completely healed, with an acceptable aesthetic outcome of the surgical scar | 428–432 |
| Woun’Dres □ Coloplast |
Collagen hydrogel; contains polymers including carbomer and collagen; other ingredients including allantoin | Level 5 | Rehydrates dry wounds and eschar; promotes moist wound environment and autolytic debridement; latex-free | Intended for dry wounds, pressure ulcers, pressure wounds, pressure sores stages II–IV, venous stasis ulcers, superficial scrapes, second- and third-degree burns, partial-thickness and full-thickness wounds, tunneling wounds, infected wounds, exuding wounds, deep cavity wounds | Dressing rehydrates dry wounds and eschar; promotes moist wound healing environment and autolytic debridement; suppress inflammation and apoptosis | Dressing promoted full-thickness excisional wound healing with scar formation; immune cell accumulation was identified in the remaining biomaterials in the wound bed | 433,434 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 5 = other clinical studies (case series or studies as reference treatment, human ex vivo MoA); Level 6a = large animal with MoA; Level 6b = large animal observational; Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro. FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
COLLAGEN AS DIETARY SUPPLEMENT
The greatest proportion of collagen products currently resides with the food industry, reaching just over 55% of the total U.S. collagen market in 2024, followed by medical products. The food industry use of collagen shows up in a variety of forms from the casings around sausages, to thickening agents such as gelatin that are used to increase viscosity or as a way of regulating flavor release.505,506 Collagen is also used in the food preservation industry to prevent water loss from meat during freezing/thawing and even shows up in ice cream products to prevent ice crystal formation. With such a large portion of the multi-billion-dollar collagen market being dedicated to the food industry, an important question comes to the forefront: Is collagen beneficial to eat?
Collagen supplements are showing up in food and beverage products across the globe, with claims of a variety of health benefits (Fig. 2). Predominantly found in connective tissues such as skin, cartilage, and bone, cartilage is recognized as source of fiber and protein. Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score evaluation following World Health Organization guidelines marks collagen as an incomplete protein source because of lack of tryptophan. Even so, peptides can substitute up to 36% of the daily protein requirements in the Western diet.507 This means that, while collagen cannot be used as a complete protein substitute, it may be a safe dietary supplement when used up to approximately one-third of a mixed protein diet.
One of the common health benefits advertised for ingested collagen products is healthier, more elastic skin with reduced wrinkle lines. It is unclear, however, what direct mechanisms of action may be responsible for these proclaimed benefits. There have been studies that make correlations between ingesting collagen bioactive dipeptides (Pro-Hyp and Hyp-Gly) or tripeptides (Gly-X-Y) and increased skin water content.508–511 There is also evidence that oral ingestion of collagen peptides increases natural moisturizing factors in the stratum corneum including urea, lactic acid, filaggrin-derived amino acids, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, and urocanic acid.512,513 However, these observations did not show that ingestion of bioactive collagen peptides have an effect on collagen production, or retention of native collagen, within the skin.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that the ingestion of collagen hydrolysates and hydrolyzed collage-based supplements have a beneficial effect on wound healing for patients with burn wounds or pressure ulcers, respectively.514,515 More recently, collagen peptides administered in combination with omega-3 fatty acids have been suggested as oral supplements with the potential to improve inflammatory responses and dysbiosis in burn patients. An RCT was performed on burn patients to determine if ingested collagen peptides were beneficial to regulate gut microbiome colonization, acting as a preventative treatment for dysbiosis. Patients did not, however, have any significant changes in Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae, or F. prausnitzii concentrations between treatment groups.447 The mechanism for how ingested collagen is utilized for therapeutic benefit in wound healing or skin elasticity has not yet been defined, yet there are still strong correlative findings in experimental trials.475,514–516 Rigorous scientific studies are needed. It is unlikely that ingested collagen is incorporated directly, for example, into the dermis to supplant and replace regions of damaged or degrading collagen. It seems much more likely that once ingested, collagen is digested down to amino acids and short peptides that can circulate and be utilized by regenerative processes as base material for de novo collagen synthesis.
Oral collagen consumption has also been investigated for benefits independent of skin elasticity and wound healing. Ingestion of undenatured type II collagen can result in an oral immune tolerance response that can serve as a therapeutic treatment for autoimmune inflammatory disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis.517 Oral immune tolerance can occur through multiple mechanisms, which begin with microfold epithelial cells (in Peyer’s patches of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue) transporting ingested antigens across the mucosal barrier.518,519 Antigen presenting cells in the Peyer’s patches associate with T cells, which in turn circulate to mesenteric lymph nodes and, subsequently, to the peripheral immune system.520 T cells activated by type II collagen enter the blood stream and secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10 when in contact with articular cartilage.518 This mechanism may result in a bystander effect that inhibits T helper (Th)1 response in arthritic lesions. Rigorous RCTs are required. Oral collagen has also shown potential benefits in cartilage degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis. In a canine model of osteoarthritis, ingestion of undenatured type II collagen markedly reduced arthritic pain through a mechanism of action independent from glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate.521 In a clinical trial, osteoarthritis patients receiving undenatured type II collagen oral doses over a 12-week period exhibited significant improvement in knee flexibility and mobility as well as reduced knee and back pain.522 This same principle has held true in clinical studies with healthy individuals that have activity-related joint discomfort. Treatment with undenatured type II collagen oral supplements resulted in improved knee joint range of motion flexibility and extensibility.523
Oral consumption of enzymatically decomposed collagen peptides and tripeptides have also been correlated with improvement in hair condition (Fig. 3). In ex vivo human culture and in vivo animal models, oral collagen peptides activated the tissue homeostasis regulating canonical Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) (Wnt/glycogen synthase kinase-3 β/β-catenin) signaling pathways and stimulated growth factor (insulin-like growth factor binding protein-6, PDGF-AB, placental growth factor, VEGF, keratin27, Gprc5d, Ki67) expression.524,525 This mechanism was associated with proliferation of human dermal papilla and outer root sheath cells, as well as human hair follicle elongation and increased hair growth. While this mechanism has not been shown in patients, it does provide insight into collagen peptide signaling mechanisms and the broader range of impacts oral collagen supplements may have in the body. These findings are promising but not definitive. Rigorous clinical studies are required.
When considering oral undenatured type II collagen supplements for personal therapeutic use, it is worth noting that not all products are created equal. Physiochemical and analytical characteristics can differ between products, with appreciable differences in color, coarseness, molecular size, and proportion of undenatured collagen to hydrolyzed collagen peptides per dose.526 These differences can be attributed to the mechanical processes and milling approaches used by the manufacturer.527 The difference in undenatured collagen per dose could have direct effects on pharmacological therapeutic benefit. Collagen as an oral supplement or therapeutic is not harmful and has several potential health-related benefits for malnutrition and inflammatory joints. However, specific uses for oral collagen supplements can often be overshadowed or sensationalized by media and advertising that boast outcomes that are not supported by rigorous science.528
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
By 2030, collagen will no longer be seen as just a cosmetic ingredient—it will be a cornerstone of regenerative medicine and personalized health care. The transformation is already underway.
Wound Healing: From Passive Dressings to Bioactive Therapies: Companies are pioneering the next generation of wound care with collagen-infused calcium alginate dressings that not only protect wounds but actively accelerate healing.529,530 These dressings maintain a moist environment, reduce scarring, and are increasingly used outside hospital settings—empowering patients to manage recovery at home. Products enriched in specific hydrolysis of collagen will serve wound dressing functions with outcomes far superior to anything we know of today. Hydrolyzed collagen hydrogels, nanofibers, and sponges will promote angiogenesis, reduce inflammation, and stimulate tissue regeneration.529,531 These materials are being tailored for chronic wounds, burns, and surgical recovery, with smart dressings on the horizon that can release drugs or signal infection in real time.532,533
Skincare: From Anti-Aging to Skin Regeneration: In the consumer space, collagen is evolving from a buzzword to a bioactive ingredient with clinically validated benefits. Topical formulations are being enhanced with collagen peptides, encapsulated delivery systems, and synergistic compounds like HA and vitamin C to improve skin elasticity, hydration, and repair.474,534–536 The next frontier is personalized collagen skincare, where products are tailored to an individual’s skin microbiome, genetic profile, and environmental exposures.537,538 Artificial intelligence-driven diagnostics and 3D skin printing may soon allow consumers to “print” collagen patches at home for targeted treatment.539–541
Healthcare and Regenerative Medicine: Beyond skin, collagen is being integrated into tissue scaffolds, injectable fillers, and implant coatings to support healing in joints, bones, and internal organs.121,382,542–544 Innovations in recombinant collagen production and production of hydrolyzed collagen active principles—using yeast, bacteria, or even plants—are making it safer, more sustainable, and customizable for medical use.545–547 In the near future, collagen-based biosensors may monitor healing progress or detect early signs of infection.532,548 Combined with wearable tech, this could revolutionize postoperative care and chronic disease management.
Sustainability and Ethical Sourcing: As demand grows, the industry is shifting toward non-animal sources of collagen, including marine collagen and lab-grown alternatives.61,77,545,546 These options reduce the risk of disease transmission, align with ethical consumer values, and open doors for vegan-certified products.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING SOURCES
The authors thank the 13 peer reviewers for their critical comments that were helpful in improving this work. Relevant work in C.K.S. laboratory is supported by grants awarded to C.K.S. as PI by the U.S. Department of Defense [Grants MTEC/2019-447, MTEC/2021-425]; the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [Grants DK119099, DK125835, DK128845, DK135447, DK143282, DK141513]; and the Biotech 2023–2024 PACommonwealth BT McGowan Grant.
Table 4.
Level of evidence 4
| Dressing | Composition | Level of evidence | Purpose/Claim | Use | Mechanism of action | Outcomes study/Trial | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BriDGE □ Harbor MedTech |
Stabilized acellular equine pericardial collagen matrix (sPCM) wound care dressing | Level 4 Level 5 Level 6a Level 7a |
Proteolytic enzyme degradation resistant, fully flexible cross-linked tissue that may be used as wound care dressing; a safe and beneficial treatment for neuropathic wounds; accelerates wound healing and reduces biofilm formation | Neuropathic foot wounds, difficult-to-treat and recalcitrant wounds of the lower extremity including diabetic, venous, trauma, vasculitic, and postsurgical wounds | Primary transient inflammatory response followed by wound healing; antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties; enhanced epithelialization and collagen deposition and maturation that promote wound healing | Closed wounds twice as fast as the published results of other skin substitute products; did not require weekly re-application | 44,375–377 |
| Cytal Wound Matrix/MicroMatrix UBM Particulate □ Integra LifeSciences |
Porcine urinary bladder matrix (UBM) sheet/porcine UBM particulate | Level 4 Level 5 |
Enables a shift from an inflammatory wound environment into one that facilitates cellular infiltration and fast formation of site-appropriate, vascularized tissue | Cytal Wound Matrix: indicated for the management of wounds including: partial and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, tunneled/undermined wounds, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, and draining wounds; not indicated for third-degree burns. MicroMatrix UBM Particulate: indicated for the management of wounds including: partial and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, tunneled/undermined wounds, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, and draining wounds | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that Cytal Wound Matrix: Supports a shift from an inflammatory wound environment into one that facilitates cellular infiltration and fast formation of site-appropriate, vascularized tissue MicroMatrix UBM Particulate: Supports a shift from an inflammatory wound environment to one that facilitates rapid revascularization to support wound closure | A prospective case control study assessed wound management with UBM which showed a statistically significant decrease in M1 to M2 scores for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, which correlated with the rate of wound area reduction; a case series that addresses the utilization of UBM products (both Cytal and MicroMatrix) in a surgical care algorithm for combat injuries in 51 cases; in 86% of cases, there was successful granulation tissue formation or preparation of the wound bed for secondary DRT placement, skin grafting, or flap coverage | 378–381 |
| Healos □ DePuy Synthes |
Bone graft substitute; mineralized collagen bone matrix; type 1 bovine collagen and hydroxyapatite particles (strips/pads) | Level 4 Level 7a Level 7b |
Provides a bone void filler that is resorbed and remodeled into bone as part of the natural healing process | For use in filling bony voids or gaps that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure; substitute for autologous iliac crest bone graft when used in fusion procedures of the lumbar spine | Healos loaded with connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and mesenchymal progenitor cells produce progeny cells that differentiate into osteoblasts and osteocytes, which can bridge the bone defect and retained a large marrow compartment | 21 patients were included and all patients achieved successful fusion; computed tomography scans showed solid bilateral fusion with bridging bone (Grade I) in all patients, but solid unilateral fusion with bridging bone (Grade II) was detected for one patient at one level | 382–385 |
| SurgiMend Collagen Matrix □ Integra LifeSciences |
Acellular fetal bovine dermis sheet | Level 4 | Implantation to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists and for the surgical repair of damaged or ruptured soft tissue membranes | Indicated for plastic and reconstructive surgery, muscle flap reinforcement, hernia repair including abdominal, inguinal, femoral, diaphragmatic, scrotal, umbilical, and incisional | MoA was not directly stated in peer-reviewed literature. Company claims that SurgiMend supports rapid revascularization and integrates with host tissue for a durable, mechanically robust repair | A retrospective case series of a single surgeon’s experience with abdominal wall reconstruction with reinforcement using Surgimend showed no recurrence in 93% of patients at 18 months, which was significantly better than the authors previous outcomes in a prior series where Surgimend was not used | 386–388 |
Collagen-based products levels of evidence. Level 4 = historical cohort (retrospective) or case-control studies (retrospective with control group); Level 5 = other clinical studies (case series or studies as reference treatment, human ex vivo MoA); Level 6a = large animal with MoA; Level 6b = large animal observational; Level 7a = small animal with MoA; Level 7b = small animal observational and in vitro. FDA status: □ - cleared; ■ - approved.
TAKE HOME MESSAGES.
- Wound Healing and Collagen-Based Products
- Collagen is the dominant structural protein (25–30% of total body protein), with types I and III being most abundant in skin (80–85% and 8–11%, respectively).549
- Mechanisms of Action
- Historical Milestones:
- 1981: First commercial collagen dressing (CollaDerm, Integra LifeSciences).
- 1985: Instat (collagen sponge for hemostasis, J&J).
- 1996: Integra dermal regeneration template (DRT) (collagen-GAG template for burns).
- 2000: ColActive (bovine collagen dressing by SouthWest Technologies).
- 2002: Promogran (collagen-cellulose matrix for chronic wounds, J&J, now Solventum).
- Mechanisms of Action
- Provides scaffold for tissue growth, reduces inflammation, maintains moist wound environment.
- Regulates mechanisms associated with diabetic ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure ulcers.
- Collagen-Based Dressings and Innovations
- Types of Collagen Dressings:
- Films (adherent, for small wounds)
- Sponges (absorbent, for high-exudate wounds)
- Hydrogels (moisture-retentive, nonadherent)
- Powders (for exudate absorption)
- Acellular scaffolds (e.g., fish skin grafts—low immunogenicity).
- Emerging Technologies
- 3D-printed collagen skin (Pandorum Tech).
- Recombinant human collagen (CollPlant’s plant-based rhCollagen).
- Phage-integrated dressings (target MRSA/Pseudomonas).
- Regenerative Medicine and Skin Substitutes
- Skin Substitutes:
- Dermagraft (living fibroblast scaffold) and Integra DRT (collagen-GAG matrix) improve healing in burns/diabetic ulcers.
- Growth factor–collagen combos (e.g., VEGF + collagen) enhance angiogenesis.
- Cardiovascular:
- Collagen-coated vascular grafts (e.g., Dacron) show >90% patency at 8 years
- Injectable collagen hydrogels support post-heart attack repair.
- Topical and Injectable Collagen
- ⚠ Topical Collagen Does NOT Replace Skin Collagen
- Large molecules cannot penetrate skin but may:
- Hydrate (temporarily plumps skin)
- Signal fibroblasts (via peptides like Gly-Pro-Hyp).
- Provide antioxidant protection
- Injectable fillers
- Short-term effects (absorbed in 1–3 months)
- Risks: Granulomas, necrosis, biofilm formation
- Alternatives: Hyaluronic acid (lasts 12–24 months)
- Orthopedics and Dental Applications
- Tendon/Bone Repair
- Acellular collagen scaffolds (e.g., GraftJacket) aid rotator cuff healing
- Collagen + BMP promotes bone growth in spinal fusion/tibial defects
- Dental Uses
- CollaPlug: Reduces postextraction bleeding/pain
- Collagen membranes (e.g., Bio-Gide) preserve alveolar bone for implants.
- Collagen as a Food Supplement
-
Limited Protein Value
- Incomplete protein (lacks tryptophan); max 36% of daily protein intake
- Claimed Benefits: skin hydration (via peptides like Pro-Hyp), but no proven collagen synthesis
- Joint health: Undenatured Type II collagen may reduce arthritis pain (oral tolerance mechanism).
⚠ Marketing Hype: Many claims lack rigorous clinical evidence.
-
- Future Directions
- Pipeline Innovations
- Biosynthetic collagen (yeast/fermentation-derived)
- Drug-eluting dressings (e.g., VEGF/PDGF-loaded collagen)
- Artificial intelligence-monitored collagen scaffolds (Integra LifeSciences).
Abbreviations and Acronyms
- ACL
anterior cruciate ligament
- Ag
silver
- AMP
antimicrobial peptide
- ASES score
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score
- bFGF
basic fibroblast growth factor
- BMA
bone marrow aspirate
- BMP
bone morphogenic protein
- CaHA
calcium hydroxyapatite
- CMI
collagen meniscus implant
- CTGF
connective tissue growth factor
- CTP
collagen tripeptide
- DFU
diabetic foot ulcer
- DICAL
calcium phosphate, dibasic
- DRT
dermal regeneration template
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- EDTA
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- FGF
fibroblast growth factor
- FN1
fibronectin-1
- GAG
glycosaminoglycan
- GBR
guided bone regeneration
- Gly
glycine
- Gprc
G protein-coupled receptor
- GTR
guided tissue regeneration
- HA
hyaluronic acid
- HDB-1
human keratinocyte β-defensin-1
- IL
interleukin
- MCP-1
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- miR
microRNA
- MMP
matrix metalloprotease
- MoA
mechanism of action
- MSC
mesenchymal stem cell
- PAD
peripheral arterial disease
- PDGF
platelet-derived growth factor
- PEG
polyethylene glycol
- PLLA
poly-L-lactic acid
- PMMA
polymethyl methacrylate
- pro-α
pro-alpha
- Pro-Hyp
prolyl-hydroxyproline
- PSDs
Peri-strip dry staples
- RCT
randomized controlled trial
- rhCollagen
recombinant human collagen
- SIS
small intestinal submucosa
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor β
- UBM
urinary bladder matrix
- UV
ultraviolet
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
- VLU
venous leg ulcer
- Wnt
Wingless-related integration site
Biographies

Chandan K. Sen
Dr. Chandan K. Sen, PhD, FNAI, is a University Endowed Professor of Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. He is the director of the McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine and serves as the Chief Scientific Officer of the UPMC Health System’s wound care service line. He has a Google Scholar H-index of 117. Dr. Andrew Friday, PhD, is a senior scientist at the McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Dr. Savita Khanna, PhD, is a Professor at the at the McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Her laboratory specializes on neurodegeneration and neuropathy with emphasis on rescue. Dr. Sashwati Roy, PhD, is a tenured Professor at the at the McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Her program focuses on wound inflammation and biofilm infection. She is a principal investigator of the NIDDK-Diabetic Foot Consortium.
Footnotes
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE AND GHOSTWRITING
Chandan K Sen serves as a paid consultant for Sanara MedTech Inc as well as for SouthWest Technologies.
REFERENCES
- 1.GrandViewResearch. Collagen Market Size To Reach $18.7 Billion By 2030. Press Release. February, 2025. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-collagen-market [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hawthorne B, Simmons JK, Stuart B, et al. Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2021;109(12):1967–1985; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Taupin P, Gandhi A, Saini S. Integra(R) dermal regeneration template: From design to clinical use. Cureus 2023;15(5):e38608; doi: 10.7759/cureus.38608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Greer N, Foman N, Dorrian J, et al. Advanced wound care therapies for non-healing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. In: Appendix A, Therapy Descriptions and References. Department of Veterans Affairs (US): Washington (DC); 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mathew-Steiner SS, Roy S, Sen CK. Collagen in wound healing. Bioengineering (Basel) 2021;8(5): 63; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8050063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pena OA, Martin P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2024;25(8):599–616; doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00715-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015;4(3):119–136; doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Landen NX, Li D, Stahle M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: A critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016;73(20):3861–3885; doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2268-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.White RJ, Cutting KF. Critical colonization–the concept under scrutiny. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006;52(11):50–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roy S, Sen CK. MiRNA in innate immune responses: Novel players in wound inflammation. Physiol Genomics 2011;43(10):557–565; doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00160.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sinha M, Sen CK, Singh K, et al. Direct conversion of injury-site myeloid cells to fibroblast-like cells of granulation tissue. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):936; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03208-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roy S, Sen CK. miRNA in wound inflammation and angiogenesis. Microcirculation 2012;19(3):224–232; doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2011.00156.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caley MP, Martins VL, O’Toole EA. Metalloproteinases and Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015;4(4):225–234; doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Broughton G, 2nd, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(7 Suppl):12S–34S; doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh D, Rai V, Agrawal DK. Regulation of Collagen I and Collagen III in Tissue Injury and Regeneration. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med 2023;7(1):5–16; doi: 10.26502/fccm.92920302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Onursal C, Dick E, Angelidis I, et al. Collagen biosynthesis, processing, and maturation in lung ageing. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:593874; doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.593874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishikawa Y, Bachinger HP. A molecular ensemble in the rER for procollagen maturation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1833(11):2479–2491; doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, et al. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J 1996;316 (Pt 1)(Pt 1):1–11; doi: 10.1042/bj3160001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vallet SD, Ricard-Blum S. Lysyl oxidases: From enzyme activity to extracellular matrix cross-links. Essays Biochem 2019;63(3):349–364; doi: 10.1042/EBC20180050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sen CK. Wound healing essentials: Let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17(1):1–18; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00436.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hopf HW, Gibson JJ, Angeles AP, et al. Hyperoxia and angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regen 2005;13(6):558–564; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2005.00078.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Allison MA, Armstrong DG, Goodney PP, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Hypertension; and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. Health disparities in peripheral artery disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023;148(3):286–296; doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Krizanova O, Penesova A, Hokynkova A, et al. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulcers: Aetiology, on the pathophysiology-based treatment. Int Wound J 2023;21(2):e14405; doi: 10.1111/iwj.14405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kalani M, Brismar K, Fagrell B, et al. Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 1999;22(1):147–151; doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.1.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sen CK, Roy S. OxymiRs in cutaneous development, wound repair and regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012;23(9):971–980; doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carter MJ, DaVanzo J, Haught R, et al. Chronic wound prevalence and the associated cost of treatment in Medicare beneficiaries: Changes between 2014 and 2019. J Med Econ 2023;26(1):894–901; doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2232256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sen CK. Human wound and its burden: Updated 2022 compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2023;12(12):657–670; doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meshkin DH, Zolper EG, Chang K, et al. Long-term mortality after nontraumatic major lower extremity amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2021;60(3):567–576; doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.06.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Castilla DM, Liu ZJ, Velazquez OC. Oxygen: Implications for wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2012;1(6):225–230; doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Han X, Ju LS, Irudayaraj J. Oxygenated wound dressings for hypoxia mitigation and enhanced wound healing. Mol Pharm 2023;20(7):3338–3355; doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Berthod F, Germain L, Tremblay N, et al. Extracellular matrix deposition by fibroblasts is necessary to promote capillary-like tube formation in vitro. J Cell Physiol 2006;207(2):491–498; doi: 10.1002/jcp.20584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gordillo GM, Sen CK. Revisiting the essential role of oxygen in wound healing. Am J Surg 2003;186(3):259–263; doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00211-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Elgharably H, Roy S, Khanna S, et al. A modified collagen gel enhances healing outcome in a preclinical swine model of excisional wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2013;21(3):473–481; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Elgharably H, Ganesh K, Dickerson J, et al. A modified collagen gel dressing promotes angiogenesis in a preclinical swine model of chronic ischemic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2014;22(6):720–729; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Das A, Abas M, Biswas N, et al. A modified collagen dressing induces transition of inflammatory to reparative phenotype of wound macrophages. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):14293; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49435-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang N, Yang L, Meng L, et al. Inhibition of miR-200b-3p alleviates hypoxia-ischemic brain damage via targeting Slit2 in neonatal rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020;523(4):931–938; doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pal D, Ghatak S, Singh K, et al. Identification of a physiologic vasculogenic fibroblast state to achieve tissue repair. Nat Commun 2023;14(1):1129; doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36665-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sen CK, Roy S, Mathew-Steiner SS, et al. Biofilm management in wound care. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148(2):275e–288e; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ganesh K, Sinha M, Mathew-Steiner SS, et al. Chronic wound biofilm model. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015;4(7):382–388; doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roy S, Santra S, Das A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection compromises wound healing by causing deficiencies in granulation tissue collagen. Ann Surg 2020;271(6):1174–1185; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schmidt B, Spino C, Roy S, et al. 311-OR: High Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) Associates with failure to maintain wound closure in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes 2024;73(Supplement_1); doi: 10.2337/db24-311-OR [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jones TLZ, Holmes CM, Katona A, et al. The NIDDK Diabetic foot consortium. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023;17(1):7–14; doi: 10.1177/19322968221121152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.La Monica F, Campora S, Ghersi G. Collagen-based scaffolds for chronic skin wound treatment. Gels 2024;10(2):137; doi: 10.3390/gels10020137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.El Masry MS, Chaffee S, Das Ghatak P, et al. Stabilized collagen matrix dressing improves wound macrophage function and epithelialization. FASEB J 2019;33(2):2144–2155; doi: 10.1096/fj.201800352R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ricard-Blum S The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011;3(1):a004978; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang H A review of the effects of collagen treatment in clinical studies. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13(22):3868; doi: 10.3390/polym13223868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sionkowska A, Adamiak K, Musiał K, et al. Collagen based materials in cosmetic applications: A review. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(19):4217; doi: 10.3390/ma13194217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghomi E, Niazi M, Ramakrishna S. The evolution of wound dressings: From traditional to smart dressings. Polymers for Advanced Techs 2023;34(2):520–530. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liang W, Ni N, Huang Y, et al. An advanced review: Polyurethane-related dressings for skin wound repair. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15(21):4301; doi: 10.3390/polym15214301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kaiser D, Hafner J, Mayer D, et al. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: A randomized controlled pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26(2):67–73; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000426715.57540.8d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xiao H, Chen X, Liu X, et al. Recent advances in decellularized biomaterials for wound healing. Mater Today Bio 2023;19:100589; doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gao EY, Tan BKJ, Teo JYY, et al. Hyaluronic acid for sinonasal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2025;15(6):616–625; doi: 10.1002/alr.23537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.da Silva CM, Reis RL, Correlo VM, et al. The efficient role of sodium alginate-based biodegradable dressings for skin wound healing application: A systematic review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2024;35(3):397–414; doi: 10.1080/09205063.2023.2289247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Brumberg V, Astrelina T, Malivanova T, et al. Modern wound dressings: Hydrogel dressings. Biomedicines 2021;9(9):1235; doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang W, Geng X, Qin S, et al. Research progress and application of chitosan dressings in hemostasis: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 282(Pt 1):136421; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Riabinin A, Pankratova M, Rogovaya O, et al. Ideal living skin equivalents, from old technologies and models to advanced ones: The prospects for an integrated approach. Biomed Res Int 2024;2024:9947692; doi: 10.1155/2024/9947692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Parham S, Kharazi A, Bakhsheshi-Rad H, et al. Antimicrobial synthetic and natural plymeric nanofibers as wound dressing: A review. Adv Eng Mater 2022;24(6):2101460; doi: 10.1002/adem.202101460 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shi S, Wang L, Song C, et al. Recent Progresses of collagen dressings for chronic skin wound healing. Collagen & Leather 2023;5(1); doi: 10.1186/s42825-023-00136-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang F, Zha D, Huang Y, et al. Sourcing, extracting, and processing collagen raw materials. In: Collagen-Based Biotextiles for Tissue Engineering. Springer; 2024; pp. 11–15; doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71563-1_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rezvani Ghomi E, Nourbakhsh N, Akbari Kenari M, et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2021;109(12):1986–1999; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cruz MA, Araujo TA, Avanzi IR, et al. Collagen from marine sources and skin wound healing in animal experimental studies: A systematic review. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2021;23(1):1–11; doi: 10.1007/s10126-020-10011-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jayaprakash S, Mohamad Abdul Razeen Z, Naveen Kumar R, et al. Enriched characteristics of poultry collagen over other sources of collagen and its extraction methods: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 2024;273(Pt 1):133004; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cheng Y, Li Y, Huang S, et al. Hybrid freeze-dried dressings composed of epidermal growth factor and recombinant human-like collagen enhance cutaneous wound healing in rats. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:742; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Su L, Jia Y, Fu L, et al. The emerging progress on wound dressings and their application in clinic wound management. Heliyon 2023;9(12):e22520; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Katrilaka C, Karipidou N, Petrou N, et al. Freeze-drying process for the fabrication of collagen-based sponges as medical devices in biomedical engineering. Materials (Basel) 2023;16(12):4425; doi: 10.3390/ma16124425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buser D, Urban I, Monje A, et al. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: Basic principle, progress over 35 years, and recent research activities. Periodontol 2000 2023;93(1):9–25; doi: 10.1111/prd.12539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Qin D, Wang N, You XG, et al. Collagen-based biocomposites inspired by bone hierarchical structures for advanced bone regeneration: Ongoing research and perspectives. Biomater Sci 2022;10(2):318–353; doi: 10.1039/d1bm01294k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Merryweather DJ, Weston N, Roe J, et al. Exploring the microstructure of hydrated collagen hydrogels under scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 2023;290(1):40–52; doi: 10.1111/jmi.13174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liang X, Huang C, Liu H, et al. Natural hydrogel dressings in wound care: Design, advances, and perspectives. Chinese Chemical Letters 2024;35(10):109442. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ko A, Liao C. Hydrogel wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcertreatment: Status-quo, challenges, and future perspectives. BMEMat 2023;1(3):e12037; doi: 10.1002/bmm2.12037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lei H, Zhu C, Fan D. Optimization of human-like collagen composite polysaccharide hydrogel dressing preparation using response surface for burn repair. Carbohydr Polym 2020;239:116249; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Feng X, Zhang X, Li S, et al. Preparation of aminated fish scale collagen and oxidized sodium alginate hybrid hydrogel for enhanced full-thickness wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;164:626–637; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Guo Y, Xu B, Wang Y, et al. Dramatic promotion of wound healing using a recombinant human-like collagen and bFGF cross-linked hydrogel by transglutaminase. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2019;30(17):1591–1603; doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1652416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Shan BH, Wu FG. Hydrogel-based growth factor delivery platforms: Strategies and recent advances. Adv Mater 2024;36(5):e2210707; doi: 10.1002/adma.202210707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kallis PJ, Friedman AJ. Collagen powder in wound healing. J Drugs Dermatol 2018;17(4):403–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Emami S, Ebrahimi M. Bioactive wound powders as wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems Powder. Technology 2023:423:118501; doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118501 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rakers S, Gebert M, Uppalapati S, et al. ‘Fish matters’: The relevance of fish skin biology to investigative dermatology. Exp Dermatol 2010; 19(4):313–324; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01059.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ibrahim A, Fahmy HM, Mahmoud GA, et al. New strategies for sterilization and preservation of fresh fish skin grafts. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):1253; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51608-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Subhan F, Hussain Z, Tauseef I, et al. A review on recent advances and applications of fish collagen. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2021;61(6):1027–1037; doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1751585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kotronoulas A, de Lomana ALG, Karvelsson ST, et al. Lipid mediator profiles of burn wound healing: Acellular cod fish skin grafts promote the formation of EPA and DHA derived lipid mediators following seven days of treatment. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2021;175:102358; doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2021.102358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yoon J, Yoon D, Lee H, et al. Wound healing ability of acellular fish skin and bovine collagen grafts for split-thickness donor sites in burn patients: Characterization of acellular grafts and clinical application. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;205:452–461; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Parker R, Kaushik M, Bansal O, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Mucograft porcine collagen bioengineered acellular dermal matrix as a spacer graft in lower eyelid elevation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024;12(1):e5562; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liang K, Ding C, Li J, et al. A review of advanced abdominal wall hernia patch materials. Adv Healthc Mater 2024;13(10):e2303506; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202303506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhong W, Chen J, Xie Q, et al. A Novel UBM/SIS composite biological Scaffold for 2-year abdominal defect repairing and strength recovery in canine model. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2025;9(1):e2400131; doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Skepastianos G, Mallis P, Kostopoulos E, et al. Assessment of decellularization strategy and biocompatibility testing of full-thickness abdominal wall to produce a tissue-engineered graft. Biomed Mater Eng 2025;36(1):43–53; doi: 10.3233/BME-240144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Liu C, Lin Z, Ruan W, et al. Safety and tissue remodeling assay of small intestinal submucosa meshes using a modified porcine surgical hernia model. Sci Rep 2024;13(1):23108; doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50425-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Snyder Y, Jana S. Strategies for development of decellularized heart valve scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2022;288:121675; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tuladhar SR, Mulderrig S, Della Barbera M, et al. Bioengineered percutaneous heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comparative evaluation of decellularised bovine and porcine pericardia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021;123:111936; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhang J, Tucker B, Tipton J, et al. 3D Printing of Pharmaceutical and Drug Delivery Devices: Progress from Bench to Bedside. Wiley; 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Willis M Out of this W out of this world inno orld innovations - But at what cost? Inno ations - But at What Cost? Innovations in ations in Synthetic Biology Disrupt Billion-Dollar Industries. The Synapse: Intercollegiate Science Magazine 2023;35(1). [Google Scholar]
- 91.da Gama Ferreira R, Misailidis N, Petrides D. Manufacturing of Human Collagen via Fermentation (Bio-Collagen). 2024.
- 92.Aminabee S Printing organs with 3D technology. In: Integrating Metaheuristics in Computer Vision for Real-World Optimization Problems. Wiley: 2024;pp. 55–70. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Andre-Frei V, Cadau S, Rival D, et al. Laser-Assisted bioprinted skin equivalent for cosmetic efficacy evaluation. 2019.
- 94.Kaiser LR. The future of multihospital systems. Top Health Care Financ 1992;18(4):32–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Petit-Zeman S Regenerative medicine. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19(3):201–206; doi: 10.1038/85619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Parikh RP, Tenenbaum MM, Yan Y, et al. Cortiva versus AlloDerm ready-to-use in prepectoral and submuscular breast reconstruction: Prospective randomized clinical trial study design and early findings. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6(11):e2013; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hinchcliff KM, Orbay H, Busse BK, et al. Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70(5):568–576; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Stein MJ, Arnaout A, Lichtenstein JB, et al. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes between Alloderm and Dermacell in immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction: A randomized control trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74(1):41–47; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Greig H, Roller J, Ziaziaris W, et al. A retrospective review of breast reconstruction outcomes comparing AlloDerm and DermaCELL. JPRAS Open 2019;22:19–26; doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Capito AE, Tholpady SS, Agrawal H, et al. Evaluation of host tissue integration, revascularization, and cellular infiltration within various dermal substrates. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68(5):495–500; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b6b01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Taufique ZM, Bhatt N, Zagzag D, et al. Revascularization of AlloDerm used during endoscopic skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019;80(1):46–50; doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zelen CM, Gould L, Serena TE, et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi-centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers. Int Wound J 2015;12(6):724–732; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Falanga V, Sabolinski M. A bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF) accelerates complete closure of hard-to-heal venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 1999;7(4):201–207; doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00201.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Stone RC, Stojadinovic O, Rosa AM, et al. A bioengineered living cell construct activates an acute wound healing response in venous leg ulcers. Sci Transl Med 2017;9(371):eaaf8611; doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Falanga V, Margolis D, Alvarez O, et al. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogeneic cultured human skin equivalent. Human Skin Equivalent Investigators Group. Arch Dermatol 1998;134(3):293–300; doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.3.293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Veves A, Falanga V, Armstrong DG, et al. ; Apligraf Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study. Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of noninfected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2001;24(2):290–295; doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Eudy M, Eudy CL, Roy S. Apligraf as an alternative to skin grafting in the pediatric population. Cureus 2021;13(7):e16226; doi: 10.7759/cureus.16226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hiscox C, Li J, Gao Z, et al. Nondestructive mechanical characterization of bioengineered tissues by digital holography. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2025;11(2):1051–1059; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Waymack P, Duff RG, Sabolinski M. The effect of a tissue engineered bilayered living skin analog, over meshed split-thickness autografts on the healing of excised burn wounds. The Apligraf Burn Study Group. Burns 2000;26(7):609–619; doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(00)00017-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Medina J, de Brugerolle de F, Chibout SD, et al. Use of human skin equivalent Apligraf for in vitro assessment of cumulative skin irritation potential of topical products. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000;164(1):38–45; doi: 10.1006/taap.1999.8875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Sams HH, Chen J, King LE. Graftskin treatment of difficult to heal diabetic foot ulcers: One center’s experience. Dermatol Surg 2002;28(8):698–703; doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02019.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Brem H, Balledux J, Bloom T, et al. Healing of diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers with human skin equivalent: A new paradigm in wound healing. Arch Surg 2000;135(6):627–634; doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.6.627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: Long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213(4):461–468; doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Nockolds CL, Hodde JP, Rooney PS. Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair. BMC Surg 2014;14:25; doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Lee HSH, Kwok HHC, Xiao MLQ, et al. Biosynthetic graft versus autologous graft tympanoplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025;282(6):2971–2975; doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09166-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Aho Falt U, Zawadzki A, Starck M, et al. Long-term outcome of the Surgisis((R)) (Biodesign((R))) anal fistula plug for complex cryptoglandular and Crohn’s fistulas. Colorectal Dis 2021;23(1):178–185; doi: 10.1111/codi.15429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Sun L, Chen J, Shen Y. Randomized controlled trial of lichtenstein repair of indirect inguinal hernias with two biologic meshes from porcine small intestine submucosa. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2019;15:1277–1282; doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S208185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Jayne DG, Scholefield J, Tolan D, et al. ; FIAT Trial Collaborative Group. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of the surgisis anal fistula plug versus surgeon’s preference for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: The FIAT trial. Ann Surg 2021;273(3):433–441; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Jamin C, Karam E, Marmouset F, et al. Tongue reconstruction after oncological resection: Analysis of the functional outcomes. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024;125(3):101707; doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Sou WK, Perng CK, Ma H, et al. The Effect of Biological scaffold (biodesign) in postmastectomy direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: A 5-year single-institution experience. Ann Plast Surg 2022;88(Suppl 1):S92–S98; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lai K, Yu Q, Huang T, et al. Bone alteration and esthetics associated with implant-supported prostheses in the anterior maxilla under different implant placement timing: A retrospective clinical study of 1 to 3 years. J Prosthet Dent 2024:S0022; doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Heimel P, Tangl S, et al. Active and passive mineralization of Bio-Gide((R)) membranes in rat calvaria defects. J Funct Biomater 2024;15(3):54; doi: 10.3390/jfb15030054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hu L, Xiang S, Liu J, et al. Combigraft versus Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in alveolar ridge preservation: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Oral Surgery 2022;15(2):163–169. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Li A, Yuen D, Martin D, et al. A comparative study of a new porcine collagen membrane to bio-gide®. Science, Technology, Innovation 2015:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kozlovsky A, Aboodi G, Moses O, et al. Biodegradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) applied in a double-layer technique in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(10):1116–1123; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01740.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Tawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): A clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(5):713–721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Palachur D, Prabhakara Rao KV, Murthy KR, et al. A comparative evaluation of bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and type I collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) and fibrin fibronectin sealing system (TISSEEL) in the treatment of intrabony defects: A clinico-radiographic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18(3):336–343; doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.134572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Liang C, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Evaluation of the effects of the small intestine submucosa biological membrane on guided bone regeneration and early loading of dental implants in the maxillary anterior region: A randomized controlled trial. J Prosthet Dent 2025:S0022; doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Meijndert CM, Raghoebar GM, Meijndert L, et al. Single implants in the aesthetic region preceded by local ridge augmentation; a 10-year randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(4):388–395; doi: 10.1111/clr.12811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Meschi N, Vanhoenacker A, Strijbos O, et al. Multi-modular bone healing assessment in a randomized controlled clinical trial of root-end surgery with the use of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin and an occlusive membrane. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(12):4439–4453; doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03309-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Djurkin A, Toma S, Brecx MC, et al. Treatment of mandibular Class II furcations using bovine-derived bone xenograft with or without a collagen membrane: A randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int 2019;50(8):652–660; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Tawil G, El-Ghoule G, Mawla M. Clinical evaluation of a bilayered collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) supported by autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(6):857–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hammerle CHF, et al. Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(5):522–529; doi: 10.1111/clr.13149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Scheyer ET, Heard R, Janakievski J, et al. A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43(12):1188–1199; doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(5):433–440; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, et al. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34(6):795–804; doi: 10.11607/prd.2133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Keil C, Gollmer B, Zeidler-Rentzsch I, et al. Histological evaluation of extraction sites grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen: Randomized controlled trial. Ann Anat 2021;237:151722; doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Starch-Jensen T, Bruun NH, Spin-Neto R. Endosinus bone gain following osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss Collagen compared with no grafting material: A one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;52(11):1205–1215; doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Li Y, Zhou W, Li P, et al. Comparison of the osteogenic effectiveness of an autogenous demineralised dentin matrix and Bio-Oss(R) in bone augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60(7):868–876; doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Puvvada D, Chittamuru N, Raju US, et al. Efficacy of autologous cortico-cancellous bone graft and platelet-rich plasma with or without Bio-Oss in bone regeneration for unilateral alveolar cleft defects: A randomized controlled trial. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2025:102256; doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Cordaro L, Bosshardt DD, Palattella P, et al. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: Histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(8):796–803; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Dang VC, Peden EK, Roy T, et al. Evaluation of CellerateRX Surgical Powder utility in reducing groin complications after femoral exposure. JVS-Vascular Insights 2025;3:100165; doi: 10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100165 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Kumar M, Banerjee P, Das A, et al. Hydrolyzed collagen powder dressing improves wound inflammation, perfusion, and breaking strength of repaired tissue. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2024;13(2):70–82; doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Nowrouzi R, Samir A. activated collagen powder significantly reduces surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective surgery. J Surg 2023;8; doi: 10.29011/2575-9760.001918 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Gitelman A The use of sterile bovine Type 1 hydrolyzed collagen to support surgical wound management: A case series. JSM Neurosurgery and Spine 2022;9(1):1108; doi: 10.47739/2373-9479/1108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Hotchkiss W Retrospective study to evaluate the use of Type 1 bovine hydrolyzed collagen to support surgical wound healing after spinal surgery. JSM Neurosurgery and Spine 2021;8(1):1103. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Evans DC, Evans BG. The effects of platelet-rich plasma and activated collagen on wound healing in primary total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2018;41(2):e262–e267; doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180213-05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Dickerman R, Reynolds A, Winters K. Operative closure technique utilizing bovine collagen fragments in a prospective analysis of 102 consecutive neurosurgery patients. JSM Neurosurgery and Spine 2017;5(2):1088. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hochstein A, Savage A. Examining the effectiveness of Type 1 activated hydrolyzed collagen in wound care. Today’s Wound Clinic 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Hochstein A, Bhatia A. Collagen: Its role in wound healing. Podiatry Management 2014:103–110. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Newman MI, Baratta LG, Swartz K. Activated, type I collagen (CellerateRx) and its effectiveness in healing recalcitrant diabetic wounds: A case presentation. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008;21(8):370–374; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000323535.51368.91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Stafyla V, Dimakakos E, Koureas A, et al. Effect of collagen powder on lymphorrhea after modified radical mastectomy. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2011;32(2):185–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Zelen CM, Serena TE, Denoziere G, et al. A prospective randomised comparative parallel study of amniotic membrane wound graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2013;10(5):502–507; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Zelen CM, Serena TE, Gould L, et al. Treatment of chronic diabetic lower extremity ulcers with advanced therapies: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi-centre comparative study examining clinical efficacy and cost. Int Wound J 2016;13(2):272–282; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N, et al. Biological properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft: Implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J 2013;10(5):493–500; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Bianchi C, Cazzell S, Vayser D, et al. ; EpiFix VLU Study Group. A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix((R))) allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Int Wound J 2018;15(1):114–122; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Chen J, Lopez CD, Girard AO, et al. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts for myelomeningocele and wound reconstruction. Childs Nerv Syst 2021;37(12):3721–3731; doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05352-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Serena TE, Carter MJ, Le LT, et al. ; EpiFix VLU Study Group. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts and multilayer compression therapy vs. multilayer compression therapy alone in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2014;22(6):688–693; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Simman R, Abbas FT. Foot wounds and the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9(12):e3989; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Thoma DS, Gasser TJW, Hammerle CHF, et al. Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading. J Periodontol 2023;94(2):230–243; doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Posessor A, Vasilyev A, Badalyan V, et al. Gingival morphology after using Fibro-Gide and Fibro-MATRIX collagen matrices and connective tissue grafts around dental implants. Genes & Cells 2024;10(4):473–484; doi: 10.17816/gc634195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Ibrahim A, Saymeh R. Alveolar ridge preservation with fibro-gide or connective tissue graft: A randomized controlled trial of soft and hard tissue changes. Clin Exp Dent Res 2024;10(4):e929; doi: 10.1002/cre2.929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Harris J, Navya P, Rajasekar A. Efficacy of Fibro-Gide® in coronally advanced flap for the treatment of multiple gingival recession: A prospective clinical study. Jioh 2024;16(2):145–149. [Google Scholar]
- 164.dos Santos T, Elias C, Lemos A, et al. In Vitro evaluation of two tissue substitutes for gingival augmentation. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 2023;14(02):23–34. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Tabanella G, Viale M. Porcine cross-linked collagen matrix for peri-implant vertical soft tissue augmentation: A randomized prospective observational study. J Funct Biomater 2024;15(9):261; doi: 10.3390/jfb15090261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Billings C, Bow AJ, Newby SD, et al. Effects on tissue integration of collagen scaffolds used for local delivery of gentamicin in a rat mandible defect model. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022;9(7):275; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Tokpam S, Bains V, Chandra C, et al. Management of single tooth gingival recession using free gingival grafting followed by coronally advanced flap with cross-linked collagen matrix: A case report. AJOHAS 2022;12(7):7. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Dadlani S, Joseph B, Anil S. Efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrices in augmenting peri-implant soft tissue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Dent Res 2024;10(4):e937; doi: 10.1002/cre2.937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Mathes SH, Wohlwend L, Uebersax L, et al. A bioreactor test system to mimic the biological and mechanical environment of oral soft tissues and to evaluate substitutes for connective tissue grafts. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010;107(6):1029–1039; doi: 10.1002/bit.22893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Fingerhut A, Uranues S, Ettorre GM, et al. European initial hands-on experience with HEMOPATCH, a novel sealing hemostatic patch: Application in general, gastrointestinal, biliopancreatic, cardiac, and urologic surgery. Surg Technol Int 2014;25:29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Lewis KM, Kuntze CE, Gulle H. Control of bleeding in surgical procedures: Critical appraisal of HEMOPATCH (Sealing Hemostat). Med Devices (Auckl) 2016;9:1–10; doi: 10.2147/MDER.S90591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Uranues S, Fingerhut A, Levin E, et al. Effectiveness of Hemopatch(R) versus Surgicel(R) Original to control mild and moderate liver bleeding. BMC Surg 2022;22(1):316; doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01747-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Uranues S, Fingerhut A, Belyaev O, et al. Clinical impact of stump closure reinforced with hemopatch on the prevention of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: A multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg Open 2021;2(1):e033; doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Teoh JY, Liu AQ, Yuen VW, et al. Hemopatch to prevent lymphatic leak after robotic prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: A randomized controlled trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(18):4476; doi: 10.3390/cancers14184476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Montera R, Ficarola F, Plotti F, et al. The use of sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH((R))) in laparotomic myomectomy: A prospective case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023;307(5):1521–1528; doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06957-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Schebesch KM, Hrbac T, Jancalek R, et al. Real-world data on the usage of Hemopatch(R) as a hemostat and dural sealant in cranial and spinal neurosurgery. Cureus 2023;15(1):e34387; doi: 10.7759/cureus.34387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Hupe MC, Buttner M, Tabrizi PF, et al. Hemopatch((R)) as a hemostatic agent is safe in partial nephrectomy: A large, single-surgeon retrospective evaluation. Adv Ther 2021;38(2):1024–1034; doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01584-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Bubis LD, Behman R, Roke R, et al. ; HPB CONCEPT team. PATCH-DP: A single-arm phase II trial of intra-operative application of HEMOPATCH to the pancreatic stump to prevent post-operative pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2022;24(1):72–78; doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Baumgartner B, Draxler W, Lewis KM. Treatment of severe aortic bleeding using hemopatch in swine on dual antiplatelet therapy. J Invest Surg 2016;29(6):343–351; doi: 10.3109/08941939.2016.1154627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Weltert L, D’Aleo S, Chirichilli I, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of HEMOPATCH topical sealant in cardiac surgery. Surg Technol Int 2016;XXIX:sti29/756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Buch-Villa E, Castaner-Puga C, Delgado-Garcia S, et al. Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (Hemopatchtm) versus axillary drainage. In patients undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy: Interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, randomized and controlled study. Br J Cancer Res 2022;5(2):558–567. [Google Scholar]
- 182.Lewis KM, Ikeme S, Olubunmi T, et al. Clinical effectiveness and versatility of a sealing hemostatic patch (HEMOPATCH) in multiple surgical specialties. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018;15(5):367–376; doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1464909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Ghanaati S, Schlee M, Webber M, et al. Evaluation of the tissue reaction to a new bilayered collagen matrix in vivo and its translation to the clinic. Biomed Mater 2011;6(1):015010; doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Menceva Z, Dimitrovski O, Popovska M, et al. Free gingival graft versus mucograft: Histological evaluation. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6(4):675–679; doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, et al. Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft((R))) versus the free gingival graft: A comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27(11):e125–e133; doi: 10.1111/clr.12575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Rokn A, Zare H, Haddadi P. Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix((R)) versus free gingival graft to augment keratinized tissue around teeth: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Front Dent 2020;17(5):1–8; doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Rotundo R, Pini-Prato G. Use of a new collagen matrix (mucograft) for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: Case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(4):413–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Al-Maawi S, Rother S, Halfter N, et al. Covalent linkage of sulfated hyaluronan to the collagen scaffold Mucograft(R) enhances scaffold stability and reduces proinflammatory macrophage activation in vivo. Bioact Mater 2022;8:420–434; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Basudan A, Babay N, Ramalingam S, et al. Efficacy of Mucograft vs Conventional Resorbable collagen membranes in guided bone regeneration around standardized calvarial defects in rats: An in vivo microcomputed tomographic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36 Suppl:s109–s21; doi: 10.11607/prd.2261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Vieira da SS, Pagnoncelli M, Paes J, et al. The use of geistlich mucograft seal and geistlich biooss membranes in the post-exodontial alveolar sealing clinical case report. J Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy 2018;2. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Clementini M, Agostinelli A, Castelluzzo W, et al. The effect of immediate implant placement on alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction: Radiographic results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46(7):776–786; doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.MacBeth ND, Donos N, Mardas N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration or socket seal technique. A randomised, single-blind controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022;33(7):681–699; doi: 10.1111/clr.13933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Helio M, Daiane P, Elizabeth M, et al. Peri-implant soft tissue augmentation with palate subepitelial connective tissue graft compared to porcine collagen matrix: A randomized controlled clinical study and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Applied Dent Sci 2019;5(3):319–325. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, et al. Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: A randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45(9):1128–1139; doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Maiorana C, Pivetti L, Signorino F, et al. The efficacy of a porcine collagen matrix in keratinized tissue augmentation: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Implant Dent 2018;4(1):1; doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0113-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Rocchietta I, Schupbach P, Ghezzi C, et al. Soft tissue integration of a porcine collagen membrane: An experimental study in pigs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(1):e34–e40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Bergamo ETP, Balderrama IF, Ferreira MR, et al. Osteogenic differentiation and reconstruction of mandible defects using a novel resorbable membrane: An in vitro and in vivo experimental study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2023; 111(11):1966–1978; doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, et al. ; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2005;41(5):837–843; doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Brown-Etris M, Milne CT, Hodde JP. An extracellular matrix graft (Oasis((R)) wound matrix) for treating full-thickness pressure ulcers: A randomized clinical trial. J Tissue Viability 2019;28(1):21–26; doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Yeh DD, Nazarian RM, Demetri L, et al. Histopathological assessment of OASIS Ultra on critical-sized wound healing: A pilot study. J Cutan Pathol 2017;44(6):523–529; doi: 10.1111/cup.12925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Rando T Use of a biological extracellular matrix wound therapy to heal complex, chronic wounds. J Wound Care 2009;18(2):70–74; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Hodde JP, Badylak SF, Brightman AO, et al. Glycosaminoglycan content of small intestinal submucosa: A bioscaffold for tissue replacement. Tissue Eng 1996;2(3):209–217; doi: 10.1089/ten.1996.2.209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Nihsen ES, Zopf DA, Ernst DM, et al. Absorption of bioactive molecules into OASIS wound matrix. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007;20(10):541–548; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000294756.97425.c9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Kellar RS, Diller RB, Tabor AJ, et al. Improved wound closure rates and mechanical properties resembling native skin in murine diabetic wounds treated with a tropoelastin and collagen wound healing device. J Diabetes Clin Res 2020;2(3):86–99; doi: 10.33696/diabetes.1.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J, et al. Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 1988;208(3):313–320; doi: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Driver VR, Lavery LA, Reyzelman AM, et al. A clinical trial of Integra Template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment. Wound Repair Regen 2015;23(6):891–900; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Branski LK, Herndon DN, Pereira C, et al. Longitudinal assessment of Integra in primary burn management: A randomized pediatric clinical trial. Crit Care Med 2007;35(11):2615–2623; doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000285991.36698.E2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Lagus H, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Bohling T, et al. Prospective study on burns treated with Integra(R), a cellulose sponge and split thickness skin graft: Comparative clinical and histological study–randomized controlled trial. Burns 2013;39(8):1577–1587; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Correa FB, Castro JCD, Almeida IR, et al. Evaluation of contraction of the split-thickness skin graft using three dermal matrices in the treatment of burn contractures: A randomised clinical trial. Wound Repair Regen 2022;30(2):222–231; doi: 10.1111/wrr.13002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Almeida IR, Gonqalves AC, Correa FB, et al. Evaluation of clinical and biomechanical features of scars resulting from the treatment of burn contractures comparing acellular dermal matrices: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2023;277(2):198–205; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Wang Y, Mithieux SM, Kong Y, et al. Tropoelastin incorporation into a dermal regeneration template promotes wound angiogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater 2015;4(4):577–584; doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Shah S, Budania P, Shah A, et al. Unique way of chest wall reconstruction using Integra Dermal Regeneration Template (IDRT) in a patient with post traumatic mucormycosis: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022;95:107229; doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT. A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg 2002;137(7):822–827; doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Vin F, Teot L, Meaume S. The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2002;11(9):335–341; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2002.11.9.26438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Wollina U, Schmidt WD, Kronert C, et al. Some effects of a topical collagen-based matrix on the microcirculation and wound healing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: Preliminary observations. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2005;4(4):214–224; doi: 10.1177/1534734605283001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Nisi G, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, et al. Use of a protease-modulating matrix in the treatment of pressure sores. Chir Ital 2005;57(4):465–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Lobmann R, Ambrosch A, Schultz G, et al. Expression of matrix-metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the wounds of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2002;45(7):1011–1016; doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0868-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Kakagia DD, Kazakos KJ, Xarchas KC, et al. Synergistic action of protease-modulating matrix and autologous growth factors in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. A prospective randomized trial. J Diabetes Complications 2007;21(6):387–391; doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Lazaro-Martinez JL, Garcia-Morales E, Beneit-Montesinos JV, et al. Randomized comparative trial of a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Cir Esp 2007;82(1):27–31; doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(07)71657-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Chen K, Sivaraj D, Davitt MF, et al. Pullulan-Collagen hydrogel wound dressing promotes dermal remodelling and wound healing compared to commercially available collagen dressings. Wound Repair Regen 2022;30(3):397–408; doi: 10.1111/wrr.13012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Karr JC, Taddei AR, Picchietti S, et al. A morphological and biochemical analysis comparative study of the collagen products Biopad, Promogram, Puracol, and Colactive. Adv Skin Wound Care 2011;24(5):208–216; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000397897.18003.ce [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, et al. Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10(1):16–25; doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10703.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Armstrong DG, Hanft JR, Driver VR, et al. ; Diabetic Foot Nutrition Study Group. Effect of oral nutritional supplementation on wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2014;31(9):1069–1077; doi: 10.1111/dme.12509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Narang R, Narang D, Narang S, et al. Management of bronchopleural fistula with the nutritional supplement-juven, Vitamins A, and C, Zinc Gluconate, and Folic Acid. Chest Journal 2016; 150(4):567A. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Berk L, James J, Schwartz A, et al. ; RTOG. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a beta-hydroxyl beta-methyl butyrate, glutamine, and arginine mixture for the treatment of cancer cachexia (RTOG 0122). Support Care Cancer 2008;16(10):1179–1188; doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0403-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kuhls DA, Rathmacher JA, Musngi MD, et al. Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma 2007;62(1):125–131; discussion 131–2; doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802dca93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Setliff J, Russell K, Wawrose R, et al. Focused nutritional supplementation reduces wound complications in patients undergoing spinal fusion. The Spine Journal 2023;23(9):S137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Moore MF, Dobson N, Castelllino L, et al. Phase angle, an alternative physiological tool to assess wound treatment in chronic nonhealing wounds. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 2011;3(1):2–7; doi: 10.1016/j.jcws.2011.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Williams JZ, Abumrad N, Barbul A. Effect of a specialized amino acid mixture on human collagen deposition. Ann Surg 2002;236(3):369–374; discussion 374–5; doi: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Hicks-Roof K The use of an arginine-enriched oral nutrition supplement to enhance wound healing from a Cesarean section. Case Rep Clin Nutr 2018;1(1–3):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 231.Anz AW, Jordan SE, Ostrander RV 3rd, et al. Augmentation of ACL autograft reconstruction with an amnion collagen matrix wrap and bone marrow aspirate concentrate: A pilot randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2023;11(11):23259671231210035; doi: 10.1177/23259671231210035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.GnanaDev R, Malkoc A, Jeney AB, et al. A multi-center analysis of revision of aneurysmal dialysis access using bovine carotid artery conduit. Ann Vasc Surg 2023;97:399–404; doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Dyer-Kindy LM, Heelan Gladden AA, Gralla J, et al. Relationship between bovine carotid artery grafts for hemodialysis access and human leukocyte antigen sensitization. Hemodial Int 2020;24(1):36–42; doi: 10.1111/hdi.12784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Lindsey P, Echeverria A, Cheung M, et al. Lower extremity bypass using bovine carotid artery graft (artegraft): An analysis of 124 cases with long-term results. World J Surg 2018;42(1):295–301; doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4161-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Abdoli S, Mahajan A, Han SM, et al. Early cannulation of bovine carotid artery grafts (Artegraft) after primary vascular access and fistula revision procedures. J Vasc Surg 2018;68(6):1865–1871; doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Fang S, Ellman DG, Andersen DC. Review: Tissue engineering of small-diameter vascular grafts and their in vivo evaluation in large animals and humans. Cells 2021;10(3):713; doi: 10.3390/cells10030713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Linke RD, Ulmer M, Imhoff AB. Replacement of the meniscus with a collagen implant (CMI). Oper Orthop Traumatol 2006;18(5–6):453–462; doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-1188-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Duarte-Silva M, Guerra-Pinto F, Camelo-Barbosa N, et al. Integration and vascular ingrowth of a collagen meniscal implant: A case report. Malays Orthop J 2019;13(2):38–41; doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1907.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Hagmeijer MH, Vonk LA, Kouwenhoven JW, et al. Surgical feasibility of a one-stage cell-based arthroscopic procedure for meniscus regeneration: A cadaveric study. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2018;24(12):688–696; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Winkler PW, Rothrauff BB, Buerba RA, et al. Meniscal substitution, a developing and long-awaited demand. J Exp Orthop 2020;7(1):55; doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00270-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Dahmardehei M, Moin Ara R, Akbari Ahmadabadi H. Comparison of the effect of using collective plus ag dressing and vaseline gauze dressing in the donor of split-thickness burn grafts. World J Plast Surg 2023;12(3):57–63; doi: 10.61186/wjps.12.3.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Salehi H, Momeni M, Ebrahimi M, et al. Comparing the effect of colactive plus ag dressing versus nitrofurazone and vaseline gauze dressing in the treatment of second-degree burns. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2018;31(3):204–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Farhani F, Forooshani Z, Roshanbin M, et al. Treatment of traumatic wounds with new dressings in an patient: A case report. Journal of Modern Family Medicine 2021;1(E101). [Google Scholar]
- 244.Alavi A, Archer J, Coutts P. Use of an advanced collagen matrix dressing on patients with complex chronic lower extremity ulcers: A case series. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021;9:2050313X211013684; doi: 10.1177/2050313X211013684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Tajalli S, Hamzekhani M, Farzi F, et al. Successful topical treatment of a gunshot wound: A case report. Trauma Case Rep 2023;44:100787; doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2023.100787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Pandey S, Kumar P. Single visit apexification in a replanted tooth with CollaCote And MTA - A case report. Int J Res Health and Allied Sciences 2016;2(1). [Google Scholar]
- 247.Sharma V, Kumar A, Puri K, et al. Application of platelet-rich fibrin membrane and collagen dressing as palatal bandage for wound healing: A randomized clinical control trial. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30(6):881–888; doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_370_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Moustafa H, Omar S, Osman S, et al. Effect of CollaTape collagen wound dressing alone and combined with ingenios synthetic bone graft on the socket healing in rabbits. Alexandria Dental Journal 2015;40(1):27–32; doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58731 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Johnson MS, Britto LR, Guelmann M. Impact of a biological barrier in pulpectomies of primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2006;28(6):506–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Vy CH, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Cardiovascular effects and efficacy of a hemostatic agent in periradicular surgery. J Endod 2004;30(6):379–383; doi: 10.1097/00004770-200406000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Ahn WB, Lee YB, Ji YH, et al. Decellularized human adipose tissue as an alternative graft material for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2022;19(5):1089–1098; doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00451-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Ansari S, Ahmed S, Abdulaziz L, et al. Wound healing of cyanoacrylate vs collagen among patients undergoing oral surgery; a systematic review. Ann Dent Spec 2023;11(4):56–61. [Google Scholar]
- 253.Cornell CN, Lane JM, Chapman M, et al. Multi-center trial of Collagraft as bone graft substitute. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Hagen A, Gorenoi V, Schonermark MP. Bone graft substitutes for the treatment of traumatic fractures of the extremities. GMS Health Technol Assess 2012;8:Doc04; doi: 10.3205/hta000102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Walsh WR, Harrison J, Loefler A, et al. Mechanical and histologic evaluation of Collagraft in an ovine lumbar fusion model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;375(375):258–266; doi: 10.1097/00003086-200006000-00031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Chapman MW, Bucholz R, Cornell C. Treatment of acute fractures with a collagen-calcium phosphate graft material. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79(4):495–502; doi: 10.2106/00004623-199704000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Eyckmans J, Roberts SJ, Schrooten J, et al. A clinically relevant model of osteoinduction: A process requiring calcium phosphate and BMP/Wnt signalling. J Cell Mol Med 2010;14(6B):1845–1856; doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00807.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Bansal S, Chauhan V, Sharma S, et al. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate mixed with bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute for posterolateral spinal fusion. Indian J Orthop 2009;43(3):234–239; doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.49387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.DeLustro F, Dasch J, Keefe J, et al. Immune responses to allogeneic and xenogeneic implants of collagen and collagen derivatives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;260(260):263–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Salvatore L, Natali ML, Brunetti C, et al. An update on the clinical efficacy and safety of collagen injectables for aesthetic and regenerative medicine applications. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15(4):1020; doi: 10.3390/polym15041020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Dhinsa BS, Bowman N, Morar Y, et al. The use of collagen injections in the treatment of metatarsalgia: A case report. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49(6):565.e5–565.e7; doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Mathison CC, Villari CR, Klein AM, et al. Comparison of outcomes and complications between awake and asleep injection laryngoplasty: A case-control study. Laryngoscope 2009;119(7):1417–1423; doi: 10.1002/lary.20485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Narins RS, Baumann L, Brandt FS, et al. A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of injectable poly-L-lactic acid versus human-based collagen implant in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62(3):448–462; doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Thioly-Bensoussan D Non-hyaluronic acid fillers. Clin Dermatol 2008;26(2):160–176; doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Man J, Rao J, Goldman M. A double-blind, comparative study of nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid versus human collagen for tissue augmentation of the dorsal hands. Dermatol Surg 2008;34(8):1026–1031; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34201.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.England LJ, Tan MH, Shumaker PR, et al. Effects of monopolar radiofrequency treatment over soft-tissue fillers in an animal model. Lasers Surg Med 2005;37(5):356–365; doi: 10.1002/lsm.20253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Shumaker PR, England LJ, Dover JS, et al. Effect of monopolar radiofrequency treatment over soft-tissue fillers in an animal model: Part 2. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38(3):211–217; doi: 10.1002/lsm.20292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Chen SG, Tzeng YS, Wang CH. Treatment of severe burn with DermACELL((R)), an acellular dermal matrix. Int J Burns Trauma 2012;2(2):105–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Vashi C Clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction with use of DermACELL, a sterile, room temperature acellular dermal matrix. Plast Surg Int 2014;2014:704323; doi: 10.1155/2014/704323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Jeon S, Ha JH, Jin US. Direct comparison of CGCRYODERM and DermACELL in the same patient for outcomes in bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction: A retrospective case series. Gland Surg 2021;10(7):2113–2122; doi: 10.21037/gs-21-149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Bullocks JM. DermACELL: A novel and biocompatible acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander and implant-based breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 2014;37(10):529–538; doi: 10.1007/s00238-014-0995-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, et al. ; Dermagraft Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(6):1701–1705; doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Marston WA. Dermagraft, a bioengineered human dermal equivalent for the treatment of chronic nonhealing diabetic foot ulcer. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004;1(1):21–31; doi: 10.1586/17434440.1.1.21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Sibbald RG, Zuker R, Coutts P, et al. Using a dermal skin substitute in the treatment of chronic wounds secondary to recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A case series. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005;51(11):22–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Joncas V, Prado R, Price Ritchie C, et al. The closure of a large chronic abdominal wound in a neonate utilizing a biologic dressing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2010;23(9):404–405; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000383212.95911.f5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Naughton G, Mansbridge J, Gentzkow G. A metabolically active human dermal replacement for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Artif Organs 1997;21(11):1203–1210; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00476.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Hansbrough JF, Dore C, Hansbrough WB. Clinical trials of a living dermal tissue replacement placed beneath meshed, split-thickness skin grafts on excised burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992;13(5):519–529; doi: 10.1097/00004630-199209000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Hansbrough JF, Morgan JL, Greenleaf GE, et al. Composite grafts of human keratinocytes grown on a polyglactin mesh-cultured fibroblast dermal substitute function as a bilayer skin replacement in full-thickness wounds on athymic mice. J Burn Care Rehabil 1993;14(5):485–494; doi: 10.1097/00004630-199309000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Narins RS, Brandt FS, Lorenc ZP, et al. A randomized, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of Dermicol-P35 and non-animal-stabilized hyaluronic acid gel for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2007;33 Suppl 2:S213–S221; discussion S221; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Shoshani D, Markovitz E, Cohen Y, et al. Skin test hypersensitivity study of a cross-linked, porcine collagen implant for aesthetic surgery. Dermatol Surg 2007;33 Suppl 2:S152–S8; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33355.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Braun M, Braun S. Nodule formation following lip augmentation using porcine collagen-derived filler. J Drugs Dermatol 2008;7(6):579–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Pitaru S, Noff M, Blok L, et al. Long-term efficacy of a novel ribose-cross-linked collagen dermal filler: A histologic and histomorphometric study in an animal model. Dermatol Surg 2007;33(9):1045–1054; discussion 1054; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33218.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Armstrong DG, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. A purified reconstituted bilayer matrix shows improved outcomes in treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers when compared to the standard of care: Final results and analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-centre clinical trial. Int Wound J 2024;21(4):e14882; doi: 10.1111/iwj.14882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Millan L, Da Silva D, Coltro P, et al. Wound management of partial-thickness skingraft donor areas with a collagen and alginate dressing (Fibracol®): Findings in 35 patients. Rev Bras Cir Plast 2015;30(2); doi: 10.5935/2177-1235.2015RBCP0148 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Sharma A, Dheer D, Puri V, et al. Insights of biopolymeric blended formulations for diabetic wound healing. Int J Pharm 2024;656:124099; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Shi L, Ermis R, Kiedaisch B, et al. The effect of various wound dressings on the activity of debriding enzymes. Adv Skin Wound Care 2010;23(10):456–462; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000383224.64524.ae [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Rodriguez MV, et al. Living cellular constructs for keratinized tissue augmentation: A 13-year follow-up from a split-mouth randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Periodontol 2023;94(11):1302–1314; doi: 10.1002/JPER.23-0040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Nunn ME, et al. A pilot study to evaluate a tissue-engineered bilayered cell therapy as an alternative to tissue from the palate. J Periodontol 2008;79(10):1847–1856; doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Lopez-Navas L, Torrents S, Sanchez-Pernaute R, et al. Compliance in non-clinical development of cell-, gene-, and tissue-based medicines: Good practice for better therapies. Stem Cells Transl Med 2022;11(8):805–813; doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szac046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al. ; Grafix Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Grafix((R)) for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: Results of a multi-centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Int Wound J 2014;11(5):554–560; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Lavery L, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al. Open-label extension phase of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial using cryopreserved placental membrane. Wounds 2018;30(9):283–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Fang WH, Vangsness CT Jr., Orthobiologic products: Preservation options for orthopedic research and clinical applications. J Clin Med 2024;13(21):6577; doi: 10.3390/jcm13216577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Regulski M, Jacobstein DA, Petranto RD, et al. A retrospective analysis of a human cellular repair matrix for the treatment of chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage 2013;59(12):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Gibbons GW. Grafix((R)), a cryopreserved placental membrane, for the treatment of chronic/stalled wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015;4(9):534–544; doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Farivar BS, Toursavadkohi S, Monahan TS, et al. Prospective study of cryopreserved placental tissue wound matrix in the management of chronic venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019;7(2):228–233; doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Adams JE, Zobitz ME, Reach JS Jr, et al. Rotator cuff repair using an acellular dermal matrix graft: An in vivo study in a canine model. Arthroscopy 2006;22(7):700–709; doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Barber FA, Burns JP, Deutsch A, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2012;28(1):8–15; doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Sharma N, El Refaiy A, Sibly TF. Short-term results of rotator cuff repair using GraftJacket as an interpositional tissue-matched thickness graft. J Orthop 2018;15(2):732–735; doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Bond JL, Dopirak RM, Higgins J, et al. Arthroscopic replacement of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears using a GraftJacket allograft: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 2008;24(4):403–409 e1; doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Boeckstyns ME, Sorensen AI, Vineta JF, et al. Collagen conduit versus microsurgical neurorrhaphy: 2-year follow-up of a prospective, blinded clinical and electrophysiological multicenter randomized, controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38(12):2405–2411; doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Bedar M, van Wijnen AJ, Shin AY. Safety of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell seeding of NeuraGen nerve guides in a Rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2023;29(2):43–53; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Pinzon-Herrera L, Magness J, Apodaca-Reyes H, et al. Surface modification of nerve guide conduits with ECM coatings and investigating their impact on schwann cell response. Adv Healthc Mater 2024;13(14):e2304103; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202304103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Rbia N, Bulstra LF, Saffari TM, et al. Collagen nerve conduits and processed nerve allografts for the reconstruction of digital nerve gaps: A single-institution case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2019;127:e1176–e1184; doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Wilson MT, Chuang SK, Ziccardi VB. Lingual nerve microsurgery outcomes using 2 different conduits: A retrospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75(3):609–615; doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.McQuilling JP, Kammer M, Kimmerling KA, et al. Characterisation of dehydrated amnion chorion membranes and evaluation of fibroblast and keratinocyte responses in vitro. Int Wound J 2019;16(3):827–840; doi: 10.1111/iwj.13103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Cazzell SM, Caporusso J, Vayser D, et al. Dehydrated amnion chorion membrane versus standard of care for diabetic foot ulcers: A randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2024;33(Sup7):S4–S14; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Moore MC, Van De Walle A, Chang J, et al. Human perinatal-derived biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;6(18); doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Koenig ZA, Burns JC, Hayes JD. Necrotic granulomatous inflammation after use of small intestine submucosa matrix for recurrent compression neuropathy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10(6):e4378; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.McQuilling JP, Sanders M, Poland L, et al. Dehydrated amnion/chorion improves achilles tendon repair in a diabetic animal model. Wounds 2019;31(1):19–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Rydningen M, Dehli T, Wilsgaard T, et al. Sacral neuromodulation compared with injection of bulking agents for faecal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury—a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2017;19(5):O134–O144; doi: 10.1111/codi.13632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Cheng AW, Abbas MA, Tejirian T. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol versus Strattice. Am Surg 2014;80(10):999–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Chand B, Indeck M, Needleman B, et al. A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair. Int J Surg 2014;12(4):296–303; doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11(10):1275–1285; doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, et al. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg 2006;63(4):255–258; doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.MacLeod TM, Cambrey A, Williams G, et al. Evaluation of Permacol as a cultured skin equivalent. Burns 2008;34(8):1169–1175; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.MacLeod TM, Williams G, Sanders R, et al. Prefabricated skin flaps in a rat model based on a dermal replacement matrix Permacol. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56(8):775–783; doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00383-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Simon TE, Johnson RJ, Naig AL, et al. Permacol interposition graft as an alternative to vein in contaminated wounds using a rabbit model. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29(6):1307–1314; doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.McGrath LA, Hardy TG, McNab AA. Efficacy of porcine acellular dermal matrix in the management of lower eyelid retraction: Case series and review of the literature. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258(9):1999–2006; doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04660-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Hunter BG. Cartilage sparing septal perforation repair using rotation flaps and a collagen interposition graft: A case series. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021;130(7):745–751; doi: 10.1177/0003489420970592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Cornwell KG, Landsman A, James KS. Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2009;26(4):507–523; doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Rennert RC, Sorkin M, Garg RK, et al. Cellular response to a novel fetal acellular collagen matrix: Implications for tissue regeneration. Int J Biomater 2013;2013:527957; doi: 10.1155/2013/527957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Lullove E Acellular fetal bovine dermal matrix in the treatment of nonhealing wounds in patients with complex comorbidities. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2012;102(3):233–239; doi: 10.7547/1020233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Neill JS, Lineaweaver WC. Tissue response to bovine fetal collagen extracellular matrix in full-thickness skin wounds. Am J Clin Pathol 2013; 140(2):248–252; doi: 10.1309/AJCPMF3B9XJAKXKM [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Neill J, James K, Lineaweaver W. Utilizing biologic assimilation of bovine fetal collagen in staged skin grafting. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68(5): 451–456; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824189ed [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Kavros SJ. Acellular fetal bovine dermal matrix for treatment of chronic ulcerations of the mid-foot associated with Charcot neuroarthropathy. Foot Ankle Spec 2012;5(4):230–234; doi: 10.1177/1938640012449037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Karr JC. Retrospective comparison of diabetic foot ulcer and venous stasis ulcer healing outcome between a dermal repair scaffold (PriMatrix) and a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf). Adv Skin Wound Care 2011;24(3):119–125; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000395038.28398.88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Hayn E Successful treatment of complex traumatic and surgical wounds with a foetal bovine dermal matrix. Int Wound J 2014;11(6):675–680; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Kavros SJ, Dutra T, Gonzalez-Cruz R, et al. The use of PriMatrix, a fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix, in healing chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective multicenter study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2014;27(8):356–362; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000451891.87020.69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Strauss NH, Brietstein RJ. Fetal Bovine dermal repair scaffold used for the treatment of difficult-to-heal complex wounds. Wounds 2012;24(11):327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Gottrup F, Cullen BM, Karlsmark T, et al. Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver treatment. Wound Repair Regen 2013;21(2):216–225; doi: 10.1111/wrr.12020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Loh ML, Goh BKL, Kong Y, et al. Combination therapy of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver dressings with negative pressure wound therapy for coverage of exposed critical structures in complex lower-extremity wounds. Int Wound J 2020;17(5):1356–1365; doi: 10.1111/iwj.13406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Chowdhry SA. Use of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC dressings to help manage skin graft donor site wounds. JPRAS Open 2019;22:33–40; doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2019.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Fletcher J, Dhoonmoon L, Chadwick P, et al. Use of Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose (ORC) and collagen dressings (PROMOGRAN™ Protease Modulating Matrix and PROMOGRAN PRISMA™ Wound Balancing Matrix) to kick-start the treatment of chronic wounds. The Diabetic Foot Journal 2020;23(1):62–9. [Google Scholar]
- 334.Bourdillon KA, Delury CP, Cullen BM. Biofilms and delayed healing - an in vitro evaluation of silver- and iodine-containing dressings and their effect on bacterial and human cells. Int Wound J 2017;14(6):1066–1075; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Vos EL, Nakauchi M, Capanu M, et al. Phase II Trial evaluating esophageal anastomotic reinforcement with a biologic, degradable, extracellular matrix after total gastrectomy and esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2022;234(5):910–917; doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Capella-Monsonis H, De Pieri A, Peixoto R, et al. Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials as adipose-derived stem cell delivery vehicles in wound healing: A comparative study between a collagen scaffold and two xenografts. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020;11(1):510; doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02021-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Kim JS, Kaminsky AJ, Summitt JB, et al. New innovations for deep partial-thickness burn treatment with ACell MatriStem matrix. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2016;5(12):546–552; doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Huen KH, Macaraeg A, Davis-Dao CA, et al. Single-layer acellular porcine bladder matrix as graft in corporoplasty for ventral curvature in pediatric proximal hypospadias repair: An initial experience. Urology 2022;169:196–201; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Frykberg RG, Cazzell SM, Arroyo-Rivera J, et al. Evaluation of tissue engineering products for the management of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: An interim analysis. J Wound Care 2016; 25(Sup7):S18–S25; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup7.S18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Liang R, Knight K, Barone W, et al. Extracellular matrix regenerative graft attenuates the negative impact of polypropylene prolapse mesh on vagina in rhesus macaque. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216(2):153 e1–153 e9; doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Abdelaziz M, Shaaban R, Abdelhalim S, et al. Effect of CollaPlug on the healing of extraction sockets in patients under oral anticoagulant therapy (clinical study). Alexandria Dental Journal 2015;40(2):166–172; doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58743 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Ahmed N, Gopalakrishna V, Shetty A, et al. Efficacy of PRF vs PRF + Biodegradable collagen plug in post-extraction preservation of socket. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1323–1328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Singh M, Madhan G. Comparison of ability of platelet-rich Fibrin vs CollaPlug in maintaining the buccal bone height of sockets following extractions in 20 patients. Journal of Health Sciences & Research 2017;8(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 344.Gupta S, Chaudhary A, Khurana P, et al. Preservation of soft tissue architecture in anterior maxillary region using Colla-Plug in conjunction with immediate implant placement – a case report. Journal of Prosthodontics Dentistry 2022;17(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 345.Zou L, Liu J, Yin S, et al. In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of MTA used for the repair of furcation perforations with and without the use of an internal matrix. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(6):e61–e65; doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Lammens J, Marechal M, Delport H, et al. A cell-based combination product for the repair of large bone defects. Bone 2020;138:115511; doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Hendrich C, Franz E, Waertel G, et al. Safety of autologous bone marrow aspiration concentrate transplantation: Initial experiences in 101 patients. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009;1(2):e32; doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Kerckhofs G, Chai YC, Luyten FP, et al. Combining microCT-based characterization with empirical modelling as a robust screening approach for the design of optimized CaP-containing scaffolds for progenitor cell-mediated bone formation. Acta Biomater 2016;35:330–340; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Ji W, Kerckhofs G, Geeroms C, et al. Deciphering the combined effect of bone morphogenetic protein 6 and calcium phosphate on bone formation capacity of periosteum derived cells-based tissue engineering constructs. Acta Biomater 2018;80:97–107; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Verdolino DV, Thomason HA, Fotticchia A, et al. Wound dressings: Curbing inflammation in chronic wound healing. Emerg Top Life Sci 2021;5(4):523–537; doi: 10.1042/ETLS20200346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Bosque BA, Frampton C, Chaffin AE, et al. Retrospective real-world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ORC in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2022;19(4):741–753; doi: 10.1111/iwj.13670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Sabo M, Le L, Yaakov RA, et al. A post-marketing surveillance study of chronic wounds treated with a native collagen calcium alginate dressing. Owm 2018;64(4):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Ranganathan M, Balaji M, Krishnaraj R, et al. Assessment of regeneration of bone in the extracted third molar sockets augmented using xenograft (CollaPlug(TN) Zimmer) in comparison with the normal healing on the contralateral side. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017;9(Suppl 1): S180–S186; doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_176_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Porto A, Stolpe G, Badaoui R, et al. One-year clinical outcomes following Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve implantation in 487 young patients with severe aortic stenosis: A single-center experience. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023;10:1196447; doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1196447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Shala M, Niclauss L. Early results of the Resilia Inspiris aortic valve in the old age patients - a retrospective comparison with the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2020;12(3):222–226; doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Bernard J, Georges G, Hecht S, et al. Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: A retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2023;37(1); doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Maeda K, Shimamura K, Yoshioka D, et al. Mid-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with the INSPIRIS RESILIA from a multicenter AVR registry. J Cardiol 2023;82(4):261–267; doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Mehdiani A, Chekhoeva A, Klein K, et al. The first report of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation within the expandable Inspiris Resilia (R) bioprosthetic valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62(2):ezac394; doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Yao M, Attalla K, Ren Y, et al. Ease of use, safety, and efficacy of integra bilayer wound matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in an outpatient clinical setting: A prospective pilot study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2013;103(4):274–280; doi: 10.7547/1030274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Iacomino E, Fratini C, Sollima L, et al. Surgical resection and immediate reconstruction with a bilayer wound collagen matrix of a rare oral angiosarcoma: A case report. Diseases 2024;12(6):117; doi: 10.3390/diseases12060117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Gonzalez GA, Castagno C, Carter J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy on complex extremity wounds requiring coverage with a meshed bilayer wound matrix: A retrospective analysis. J Wound Care 2022;31(Sup9):S8–S15; doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup9.S8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Othman S, Lukowiak T, Shakir S, et al. Bilayer wound matrix-based cutaneous scalp reconstruction: A multidisciplinary case control analysis of factors associated with reconstructive success and failure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74(11):3008–3014; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Bascone CM, Deitermann A, Lin SK, et al. Using integra for reconstruction of facial defects after mohs micrographic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023;11(12):e5474; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Shores JT, Hiersche M, Gabriel A, et al. Tendon coverage using an artificial skin substitute. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65(11):1544–1550; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Gabriel A, Thimmappa B, Rubano C, et al. Evaluation of an ultra-lightweight, single-patient-use negative pressure wound therapy system over dermal regeneration template and skin grafts. Int Wound J 2013;10(4):418–424; doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00999.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Koenen W, Felcht M, Vockenroth K, et al. One-stage reconstruction of deep facial defects with a single layer dermal regeneration template. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25(7):788–793; doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03863.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Muller CS, Schiekofer C, Korner R, et al. Improved patient-centered care with effective use of Integra (R) in dermatologic reconstructive surgery. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013;11(6):537–548; doi: 10.1111/ddg.12038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Casal-Beloy I, Somoza Argibay I, Garcia-Gonzalez M, et al. Management of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery in pediatric patients: Initial experience with dermal regeneration sheet Integra. Cir Pediatr 2017;30(4):207–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Falcone M, Preto M, Ciclamini D, et al. Bioengineered dermal matrix (Integra(R) reduces donor site morbidity in total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap. Int J Impot Res 2023; doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00775-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Bagetala B, Fonseca F, Morton S, et al. Safety and Efficacy KollaGen II-xs: A 60-day Clinical Trial. West Indian Med J 2023;70(1):69; doi: 10.7727/wimj.2026.293 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Griswold JA, Cepica T, Rossi L, et al. A comparison of Xeroform and SkinTemp dressings in the healing of skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995;16(2 Pt 1):136–140; doi: 10.1097/00004630-199503000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Kolenik SA 3rd, McGovern TW, Leffell DJ. Use of a lyophilized bovine collagen matrix in postoperative wound healing. Dermatol Surg 1999;25(4): 303–307; doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08230.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Sreekumar N, Bhandari P, Praveen N. Comparative study of collagen and paraffin gauze dressing on skin graft donor site. Indian Journal of Burns 2015;23(1):81–83; doi: 10.4103/0971-653X.171663 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Tseng HJ, Tsou TL, Wang HJ, et al. Characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2013;7(1):20–31; doi: 10.1002/term.492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Mulder G, Lee DK. A retrospective clinical review of extracellular matrices for tissue reconstruction: Equine pericardium as a biological covering to assist with wound closure. Wounds 2009;21(9):254–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Fleischli JG, Laughlin TJ, Fleischli JW. Equine pericardium collagen wound dressing in the treatment of the neuropathic diabetic foot wound: A pilot study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2009;99(4):301–305; doi: 10.7547/0980301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Van Kampen C, Arnoczky S, Parks P, et al. Tissue-engineered augmentation of a rotator cuff tendon using a reconstituted collagen scaffold: A histological evaluation in sheep. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2013;3(3):229–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Paige JT, Kremer M, Landry J, et al. Modulation of inflammation in wounds of diabetic patients treated with porcine urinary bladder matrix. Regen Med 2019;14(4):269–277; doi: 10.2217/rme-2019-0009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Valerio IL, Campbell P, Sabino J, et al. The use of urinary bladder matrix in the treatment of trauma and combat casualty wound care. Regen Med 2015;10(5):611–622; doi: 10.2217/rme.15.34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Rommer EA, Peric M, Wong A. Urinary bladder matrix for the treatment of recalcitrant nonhealing radiation wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26(10):450–455; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000434617.57451.e6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Diller RB, Tabor AJ. The Role of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) in wound healing: A review. Biomimetics (Basel) 2022;7(3):87; doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7030087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382.Yousef MAA, La Maida GA, Misaggi B. Long-term radiological and clinical outcomes after using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells concentrate obtained with selective retention cell technology in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42(24):1871–1879; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Carter JD, Swearingen AB, Chaput CD, et al. Clinical and radiographic assessment of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using HEALOS collagen-hydroxyapatite sponge with autologous bone marrow aspirate. Spine J 2009;9(6):434–438; doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Wang W, Strecker S, Liu Y, et al. Connective Tissue Growth Factor reporter mice label a subpopulation of mesenchymal progenitor cells that reside in the trabecular bone region. Bone 2015;71:76–88; doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Basile M, Marchegiani F, Novak S, et al. Human amniotic fluid stem cells attract osteoprogenitor cells in bone healing. J Cell Physiol 2020;235(5):4643–4654; doi: 10.1002/jcp.29342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Asaad M, Kapur SK, Baumann DP, et al. Acellular dermal matrix provides durable long-term outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction: A study of patients with over 60 months of follow-up. Ann Surg 2022;276(5):e563–e570; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Janfaza M, Martin M, Skinner R. A preliminary comparison study of two noncrosslinked biologic meshes used in complex ventral hernia repairs. World J Surg 2012;36(8):1760–1764; doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1576-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Lineaweaver W Improvement of success rates for abdominal component reconstructions using bovine fetal collagen. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68(5):438–441; doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824bd75c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389.DiCosmo F Edge effect the role of collagen in wound healing. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2009;22(1):12–15.19096278 [Google Scholar]
- 390.Ayello EA. TIME Heals wounds-advances in modern wound care technologies. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2009;22(1):1; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305447.48940.f3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Fitzgerald R, Steinberg J. Collagen in wound healing: Are we onto something new or just repeating the past? The Foot and Anckle Online Journal 2009;2(9):3; doi: 10.3827/faoj.2009.0209.0003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Almazrooa SA, Noonan V, Woo SB. Resorbable collagen membranes: Histopathologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;118(2):236–240; doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Park I, Kim Y, Jeong D, et al. Minimally invasive immediate implantation in teeth with gingival recession: 3 case reports. J Dent Implant Res 2024;43(2):9–18; doi: 10.54527/jdir.2024.43.2.9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Dagba A, Mourlass J, Durand D, et al. A novel approach to treat large schneiderian membrane perforation -a case series. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Health 2015;1(6); doi: 10.16966/2378-7090.137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Heffner JJ, Holmes JW, Ferrari JP, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma on a collagen matrix to improve fascial healing. Hernia 2012;16(6):677–687; doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0941-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Liden BA, May BC. Clinical outcomes following the use of ovine forestomach matrix (endoform dermal template) to treat chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26(4):164–167; doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000428862.34294.d4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.Melnychuk I, Servetnyk I, Kosnik N. Extracellular matrix-based collagen dressings for scalp repair following mohs micrographic surgery. Cutis 2023;111(5):E33–E35; doi: 10.12788/cutis.0796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Merrilees MJ, Falk BA, Zuo N, et al. Use of versican variant V3 and versican antisense expression to engineer cultured human skin containing increased content of insoluble elastin . J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2017;11(1):295–305; doi: 10.1002/term.1913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Devore D, Zhu J, Brooks R, et al. Development and characterization of a rapid polymerizing collagen for soft tissue augmentation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016;104(3):758–767; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Tai HC, Liao YH, Chang YC, et al. An evaluation of skin and immunological responses after using a novel cross-linked porcine-based dermal injectable collagen with lidocaine for nasolabial fold correction. J Clin Med 2024;13(17):5241; doi: 10.3390/jcm13175241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Chuang AD, Lin ET, Wu BQ, et al. Quantitative Assessment of New Frontiers in Dermatochalasis and Periorbital Hyperpigmentation Treatment: The Role of Cross-Linked Porcine Collagen. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025;49(8):2191–2201; doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04407-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Yang CY, Chang YC, Tai HC, et al. Evaluation of collagen dermal filler with lidocaine for the correction of nasolabial folds: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2024;17:1621–1631; doi: 10.2147/CCID.S447760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Sasse KC, Lambin JH, Gevorkian J, et al. Long-term clinical, radiological, and histological follow-up after complex ventral incisional hernia repair using urinary bladder matrix graft reinforcement: A retrospective cohort study. Hernia 2018;22(6):899–907; doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1830-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Sasse KC, Warner DL, Ackerman E, et al. Parastomal hernia repair with urinary bladder matrix grafts: A case series. Int J Case Rep Images 2016;7(2):85–91; doi: 10.5348/ijcri-201604-CS-10065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Riganti JM, Ciotola F, Amenabar A, et al. Urinary bladder matrix scaffolds strengthen esophageal hiatus repair. J Surg Res 2016;204(2):344–350; doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406.Sasse KC, Warner DL, Ackerman E, et al. Hiatal hernia repair with novel biological graft reinforcement. JSLS 2016;20(2):e2016.00016; doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407.Young DA, Jackson N, Ronaghan CA, et al. Retrorectus repair of incisional ventral hernia with urinary bladder matrix reinforcement in a long-term porcine model. Regen Med 2018;13(4):395–408; doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.Young DA, McGilvray KC, Ehrhart N, et al. Comparison of in vivo remodeling of urinary bladder matrix and acellular dermal matrix in an ovine model. Regen Med 2018;13(7):759–773; doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409.Ottenbacher N, Alkildani S, Korzinskas T, et al. Novel histomorphometrical approach to evaluate the integration pattern and functionality of barrier membranes. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9(11):127; doi: 10.3390/dj9110127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410.Kolliker R, Hicklin SP, Hirsiger C, et al. In vitro evaluation of the permeability of different resorbable xenogeneic membranes after collagenolytic degradation. Membranes (Basel) 2022;12(8):787; doi: 10.3390/membranes12080787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411.Neiva R, Pagni G, Duarte F, et al. Analysis of tissue neogenesis in extraction sockets treated with guided bone regeneration: Clinical, histologic, and micro-CT results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31(5):457–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412.Thomas L, Malathi K, Muthukumaraswamy A, et al. Comparative evaluation of concentrated growth factor with bioactive glass and collagen membrane in the treatment of horizontal osseous defects with open flap debridement. Int J of Med Sci Curr Res 2021;4(6):698–711. [Google Scholar]
- 413.Pesce P, Zubery Y, Goldlust A, et al. Ossification and bone regeneration in a canine GBR model, Part 2: Glycated cross-linked collagenated alloplastic hydroxyapatite scaffold vs non-cross-linked collagenated xenographic bone hydroxyapatite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38(5):923–932; doi: 10.11607/jomi.9822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414.Chillarge G, O’Neill R, Safranek P. Mid-oesophageal traction diverticulum in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. BMJ Case Rep 2021;14(4):e238529; doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-238529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415.Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME. Comparison of permanent and nonpermanent staple line buttressing materials for linear gastric staple lines during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008;4(6):729–734; doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416.Wahab N, Roman M, Chakravarthy D, et al. The use of a pure native collagen dressing for wound bed preparation prior to use of a living Bi-layered skin substitute. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec 2014;6(1–2):2–8; doi: 10.1016/j.jccw.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 417.Lozeau LD, Grosha J, Kole D, et al. Collagen tethering of synthetic human antimicrobial peptides cathelicidin LL37 and its effects on antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity. Acta Biomater 2017;52:9–20; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418.Capella-Monsonis H, Tilbury MA, Wall JG, et al. Porcine mesothelium matrix as a biomaterial for wound healing applications. Mater Today Bio 2020;7:100057; doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419.Shah SV, Chakravarthy D. Evaluation of a bovine 100% native collagen for the treatment of chronic wounds: A case series. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2015;42(3):226–234; doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420.Maghsoudi P, Slot DE, van der Weijden FGA. Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1–1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants. Clin Exp Dent Res 2022;8(3):680–689; doi: 10.1002/cre2.574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421.Al-Qutub MN, Al-Omar NA, Ramalingam S, et al. Guided bone regeneration using biphasic calcium phosphate with adjunct recombinant human bone morphogenetic Protein-2 with and without collagen membrane in standardized calvarial defects in rats: A histologic and biomechanical analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36 Suppl: s11–s20; doi: 10.11607/prd.2376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422.Guerra I, Morais Branco F, Vasconcelos M, et al. Evaluation of implant osseointegration with different regeneration techniques in the treatment of bone defects around implants: An experimental study in a rabbit model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(3):314–322; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02002.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423.Nielsen JJ, Low SA, Chen C, et al. Targeted delivery of abaloparatide to spinal fusion site accelerates fusion process in rats. Biomedicines 2024;12(3):612; doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424.Baratta L, Superville Y. Demonstrating the clinical efficacy of a multi-modality approach to managing various wound aetiologies. Wounds International 2023;14(3). [Google Scholar]
- 425.Kiat S, Imran F. The UKM StimuGold (UKMSG) Wound bed preparation method: A unique technique in combining superabsorbent polymer polyacrylate sodium with collagen–Glycerine amorphous base dressing: A case series. Br J Surgical Sci 2022;3:71–78. [Google Scholar]
- 426.Faramarzi MR, Fatahi S, Rahimi K, et al. Comprehensive infectious diabetic foot ulcer repair through multiple dressing methods, maggot therapy, and vacuum therapy after amputation: A case report study. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024;121:109970; doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427.Emami S, Ebrahimi M. Bioactive wound powders as wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems. Powder Technology 2023:423; doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118501 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 428.Papanas N, Papachristou S, Kefala C, et al. Use of the new vergenix soft tissue repair matrix to heal a chronic neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2020;19(2):205–206; doi: 10.1177/1534734620903597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429.Ferraro GA, Lanzano G, Grella E, et al. Successful treatment of wound dehiscence by innovative type 1 collagen flowable gel: A case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10(6):e4360; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430.Farkash U, Avisar E, Volk I, et al. First clinical experience with a new injectable recombinant human collagen scaffold combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of lateral epicondylar tendinopathy (tennis elbow). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28(3):503–509; doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 431.Shilo S, Roth S, Amzel T, et al. Cutaneous wound healing after treatment with plant-derived human recombinant collagen flowable gel. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19(13–14):1519–1526; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432.Willard JJ, Drexler JW, Das A, et al. Plant-derived human collagen scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19(13–14):1507–1518; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433.Poranki D, Goodwin C, Van Dyke M. Assessment of deep partial thickness burn treatment with keratin biomaterial hydrogels in a swine model. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:1803912; doi: 10.1155/2016/1803912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434.Liu Y, Suarez-Arnedo A, Caston ELP, et al. Exploring the role of spatial confinement in immune cell recruitment and regeneration of skin wounds. Adv Mater 2023;35(49):e2304049; doi: 10.1002/adma.202304049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435.Fan Gaskin JC, Kong RCK, Shah MH, et al. Inhibitory Effects of 3′,4′-Dihydroxyflavonol in a mouse model of glaucoma filtration surgery and TGFbeta1-induced responses in human tenon’s fibroblasts. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022;11(8):18; doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.8.18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436.Kip P, Tao M, Trocha KM, et al. Periprocedural hydrogen sulfide therapy improves vascular remodeling and attenuates vein graft disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9(22):e016391; doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437.Serala K, Bai J, Prince S. Pyrvinium pamoate alone and with gemcitabine exhibits anti-pancreatic cancer activity in 2D and 3D cell culture models. J Cell Mol Med 2024;28(23):e70222; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438.Capella-Monsonis H, Kelly J, Kearns S, et al. Decellularised porcine peritoneum as a tendon protector sheet. Biomed Mater 2019;14(4):044102; doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab2301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439.Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010;89(3):219–229; doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440.Dave T, Habte A, Vora V, et al. Sushruta: The Father of Indian surgical history. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024;12(4):e5715; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441.Yannas IV, Burke JF, Warpehoski M, et al. Prompt, long-term functional replacement of skin. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1981;27:19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 442.Noordenbos J, Dore C, Hansbrough JF. Safety and efficacy of TransCyte for the treatment of partial-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999;20(4):275–281; doi: 10.1097/00004630-199907000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443.Tan Q, Chen B, Yan X, et al. Promotion of diabetic wound healing by collagen scaffold with collagen-binding vascular endothelial growth factor in a diabetic rat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;8(3):195–201; doi: 10.1002/term.1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444.Ding S, Xu Y, Yan X, et al. Effect of collagen scaffold with Bcl-2-Modified Adipose-derived stem cells on diabetic mice wound healing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2020;19(2):139–147; doi: 10.1177/1534734619880055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445.Jana S, Datta P, Das H, et al. Copper and cobalt doped bioactive glass-fish dermal collagen electro-spun mat triggers key events of diabetic wound healing in full-thickness skin defect model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022;134:105414; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446.Chakrabarti S, Mazumder B, Rajkonwar J, et al. bFGF and collagen matrix hydrogel attenuates burn wound inflammation through activation of ERK and TRK pathway. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):3357; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82888-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447.Salehi S, Hosseinzadeh-Attar MJ, Alipoor E, et al. Effects of hydrolyzed collagen alone or in combination with fish oil on the gut microbiome in patients with major burns. Burns 2024;50(2): 444–453; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448.Pinard A, Jones GT, Milewicz DM. Genetics of thoracic and abdominal aortic diseases. Circ Res 2019;124(4):588–606; doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449.Zuo X, Xiao Y, Yang J, et al. Engineering collaen-based biomaterials for cardiovascular medicine. Collagen & Leather 2024;6(1):1–23. [Google Scholar]
- 450.Prager M, Polterauer P, Bohmig HJ, et al. Collagen versus gelatin-coated Dacron versus stretch polytetrafluoroethylene in abdominal aortic bifurcation graft surgery: Results of a seven-year prospective, randomized multicenter trial. Surgery 2001;130(3):408–414; doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.115904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451.Wissink MJ, Beernink R, Poot AA, et al. Improved endothelialization of vascular grafts by local release of growth factor from heparinized collagen matrices. J Control Release 2000;64(1–3):103–114; doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00145-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452.Liu K, Zhang F, Wei Y, et al. Dressing blood-contacting materials by a stable hydrogel coating with embedded antimicrobial peptides for robust antibacterial and antithrombus properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021;13(33):38947–38958; doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c05167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453.Blackburn NJ, Sofrenovic T, Kuraitis D, et al. Timing underpins the benefits associated with injectable collagen biomaterial therapy for the treatment of myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 2015;39:182–192; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454.Zheng Z, Tan Y, Li Y, et al. Biotherapeutic-loaded injectable hydrogels as a synergistic strategy to support myocardial repair after myocardial infarction. J Control Release 2021;335:216–236; doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.05.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455.Wunderlich K, Suppa M, Gandini S, et al. Risk factors and innovations in risk assessment for melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16(5):1016; doi: 10.3390/cancers16051016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456.Konya I, Shishido I, Nemoto M, et al. Risk factors of skin barrier dysfunction in older adults: A systematic review. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2024;21(3):e12597; doi: 10.1111/jjns.12597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457.Worrede A, Douglass SM, Weeraratna AT. The dark side of daylight: Photoaging and the tumor microenvironment in melanoma progression. J Clin Invest 2021;131(6):e143763; doi: 10.1172/JCI143763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458.Rozario T, DeSimone DW. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev Biol 2010;341(1):126–140; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459.Liu H, Dong J, Du R, et al. Collagen study advances for photoaging skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2024;40(1):e12931; doi: 10.1111/phpp.12931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460.Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI. Collagens and collagen-related diseases. Ann Med 2001;33(1):7–21; doi: 10.3109/07853890109002055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461.Neshatian M, Mittal N, Huang S, et al. Investigation of dermal collagen nanostructures in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) patients. PLoS One 2024;19(8):e0307442; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462.Gahlawat S, Siess J, Losada N, et al. Impact of vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome-associated Gly substitutions on structure, function, and mechanics using bacterial collagen. Matrix Biol 2025;135:87–98; doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2024.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463.Kling S, Torres-Netto EA, Abdshahzadeh H, et al. Collagen V insufficiency in a mouse model for Ehlers Danlos-syndrome affects viscoelastic biomechanical properties explaining thin and brittle corneas. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):17362; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96775-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464.Morais P, Mota A, Eloy C, et al. Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case with fatal outcome. Dermatol Online J 2011;17(4):1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465.Malfait F, Wenstrup RJ, De Paepe A. Clinical and genetic aspects of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type. Genet Med 2010;12(10):597–605; doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181eed412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466.Mao JR, Bristow J. The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: On beyond collagens. J Clin Invest 2001;107(9):1063–1069; doi: 10.1172/JCI12881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467.Chen Y, Yang S, Lovisa S, et al. Type-I collagen produced by distinct fibroblast lineages reveals specific function during embryogenesis and Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):7199; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27563-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468.Verzijl N, DeGroot J, Thorpe SR, et al. Effect of collagen turnover on the accumulation of advanced glycation end products. J Biol Chem 2000;275(50):39027–39031; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006700200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469.Tsurufuji S, Ishibashi S. Glycine-Serum intercon-version and collagen biosynthesis in Vivo. possible difference in the amino acid supplying system between skin collagen and serum albumin in Guinea Pigs. J Biochem 1965;57:155–160; doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a128071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470.Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem 2009;78:929–958; doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.032207.120833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471.Li P, Wu G. Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids 2018;50(1):29–38; doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2490-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472.Phang JM. The regulatory mechanisms of proline and hydroxyproline metabolism: Recent advances in perspective. Front Oncol 2022;12:1118675; doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1118675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473.Li GY, Fukunaga S, Takenouchi K, et al. Comparative study of the physiological properties of collagen, gelatin and collagen hydrolysate as cosmetic materials. Int J Cosmet Sci 2005;27(2):101–106; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2004.00251.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474.Aguirre-Cruz G, Leon-Lopez A, Cruz-Gomez V, et al. Collagen Hydrolysates for skin protection: Oral administration and topical formulation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020;9(2):181; doi: 10.3390/antiox9020181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475.Yazaki M, Ito Y, Yamada M, et al. Oral ingestion of collagen hydrolysate leads to the transportation of highly concentrated Gly-Pro-Hyp and its hydrolyzed form of Pro-Hyp into the bloodstream and skin. J Agric Food Chem 2017;65(11):2315–2322; doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476.Agustina L, Miatmoko A, Hariyadi DM. Challenges and strategies for collagen delivery for tissue regeneration. J Public Health Afr 2023;14(Suppl 1):2505; doi: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477.Lemperle G, Knapp TR, Sadick NS, et al. ArteFill permanent injectable for soft tissue augmentation: I. Mechanism of action and injection techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34(3):264–272; doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9413-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478.Knapp TR, Kaplan EN, Daniels JR. Injectable collagen for soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;60(3):398–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479.Jia Y, Qiu L, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy and safety of Type III Collagen lyophilized fibers using mid-to-deep dermal facial injections for the correction of dynamic facial wrinkles. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024;48(13):2500–2512; doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03838-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480.Lucey P, Goldberg DJ. Complications of collagen fillers. Facial Plast Surg 2014;30(6):615–622; doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481.Kroumpouzos G, Treacy P. Hyaluronidase for dermal filler complications: Review of applications and dosage recommendations. JMIR Dermatol 2024;7:e50403; doi: 10.2196/50403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482.Kim JH, Kwon TR, Hong SW, et al. Comparative evaluation of the biodegradability and wrinkle reduction efficacy of human-derived collagen filler and hyaluronic acid filler. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019;43(4):1095–1101; doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01373-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483.Chiang YZ, Pierone G, Al-Niaimi F. Dermal fillers: Pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of complications. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31(3):405–413; doi: 10.1111/jdv.13977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484.Rzepniewski P, Zatorski T, Nowak A, et al. Longevity of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers - current state of knowledge. pd 2024;111(1):47–51. [Google Scholar]
- 485.Mienaltowski MJ, Birk DE. Structure, physiology, and biochemistry of collagens. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014;802:5–29; doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7893-1_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486.Yang SM, Chen WS. Conservative treatment of tendon injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2020;99(6):550–557; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487.Lu J, Jiang L, Chen Y, et al. The functions and mechanisms of basic fibroblast growth factor in tendon repair. Front Physiol 2022;13:852795; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.852795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488.Weber S, Chahal J. Management of rotator cuff injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28(5):e193–e201; doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489.Nejad AR, Hamidieh AA, Amirkhani MA, et al. Update review on five top clinical applications of human amniotic membrane in regenerative medicine. Placenta 2021;103:104–119; doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490.Keeley R, Topoluk N, Mercuri J. Tissues reborn: Fetal membrane-derived matrices and stem cells in orthopedic regenerative medicine. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2014;42(3–4):249–270; doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.2014011591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491.Bai X, Gao M, Syed S, et al. Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 2018;3(4):401–417; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492.Blair HC, Larrouture QC, Li Y, et al. Osteoblast differentiation and bone matrix formation in vivo and in vitro. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2017;23(3):268–280; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493.Abreu JG, Ketpura NI, Reversade B, et al. Connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) modulates cell signalling by BMP and TGF-beta. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4(8):599–604; doi: 10.1038/ncb826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494.Nauth A, McKee MD, Einhorn TA, et al. Managing bone defects. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(8):462–466; doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318224caf0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495.Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(9):1055–1060; doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496.Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;329(329):300–309; doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497.Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, et al. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: A systematic review. Injury 2011;42 Suppl 2:S3–S15; doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498.Skaggs DL, Samuelson MA, Hale JM, et al. Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(18):2400–2402; doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499.Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3(3):192–195; doi: 10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500.Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005;366(9499):1809–1820; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 501.Villoria GEM, Fischer RG, Tinoco EMB, et al. Periodontal disease: A systemic condition. Periodontol 2000 2024;96(1):7–19; doi: 10.1111/prd.12616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502.Broers DLM, Dubois L, de Lange J, et al. Reasons for tooth removal in adults: A systematic review. Int Dent J 2022;72(1):52–57; doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503.Stoecklin-Wasmer C, Rutjes AW, da Costa BR, et al. Absorbable collagen membranes for periodontal regeneration: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2013;92(9):773–781; doi: 10.1177/0022034513496428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504.Udeabor SE, Heselich A, Al-Maawi S, et al. Current knowledge on the healing of the extraction socket: A narrative review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023;10(10):1145; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505.Pates G, White T, Durkee S, et al. UC-II(R) undenatured type II collagen data show retention during functional food and beverage prototype processing. Data Brief 2023;48:109216; doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506.Liu D, Nikoo M, Boran G, et al. Collagen and gelatin. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2015;6:527–557; doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-031414-111800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507.Paul C, Leser S, Oesser S. Significant amounts of functional collagen peptides can be incorporated in the diet while maintaining indispensable amino acid balance. Nutrients 2019;11(5):1079; doi: 10.3390/nu11051079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508.Seong SH, Lee YI, Lee J, et al. Low-molecular-weight collagen peptides supplement promotes a healthy skin: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024;23(2):554–562; doi: 10.1111/jocd.16026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509.Inoue N, Sugihara F, Wang X. Ingestion of bioactive collagen hydrolysates enhance facial skin moisture and elasticity and reduce facial ageing signs in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. J Sci Food Agric 2016;96(12):4077–4081; doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 510.Kim DU, Chung HC, Choi J, et al. Oral intake of low-molecular-weight collagen peptide improves hydration, elasticity, and wrinkling in human skin: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients 2018;10(7):826; doi: 10.3390/nu10070826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511.Lee M, Kim E, Ahn H, et al. Oral intake of collagen peptide NS improves hydration, elasticity, desquamation, and wrinkling in human skin: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Food Funct 2023;14(7):3196–3207; doi: 10.1039/d2fo02958h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512.Miyanaga M, Uchiyama T, Motoyama A, et al. Oral supplementation of collagen peptides improves skin hydration by increasing the natural moisturizing factor content in the stratum corneum: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2021;34(3):115–127; doi: 10.1159/000513988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513.Rawlings AV, Scott IR, Harding CR, et al. Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level. J Invest Dermatol 1994;103(5):731–741; doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12398620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514.Bagheri Miyab K, Alipoor E, Vaghardoost R, et al. The effect of a hydrolyzed collagen-based supplement on wound healing in patients with burn: A randomized double-blind pilot clinical trial. Burns 2020;46(1):156–163; doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515.Sugihara F, Inoue N, Venkateswarathirukumara S. Ingestion of bioactive collagen hydrolysates enhanced pressure ulcer healing in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):11403; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29831-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516.Pu SY, Huang YL, Pu CM, et al. Effects of oral collagen for skin anti-aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2023;15(9):2080; doi: 10.3390/nu15092080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517.Trentham DE, Dynesius-Trentham RA, Orav EJ, et al. Effects of oral administration of type II collagen on rheumatoid arthritis. Science 1993;261(5129):1727–1730; doi: 10.1126/science.8378772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518.Orhan C, Juturu V, Sahin E, et al. Undenatured Type II collagen ameliorates inflammatory responses and articular cartilage damage in the rat model of osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:617789; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.617789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519.Lerman RH, Chang JL, Konda V, et al. Nutritional approach for relief of joint discomfort: A 12-week, open-case series and illustrative case report. Integr Med (Encinitas) 2015;14(5):52–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520.Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Dai H, et al. The potential of undenatured type II collagen against arthritis: A review. Collagen & Leather 2024;6(1):17; doi: 10.1186/s42825-024-00160-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 521.Gupta RC, Canerdy TD, Lindley J, et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy and safety of type-II collagen (UC-II), glucosamine and chondroitin in arthritic dogs: Pain evaluation by ground force plate. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2012; 96(5):770–777; doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01166.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522.Shiojima Y, Takahashi M, Takahashi R, et al. Efficacy and safety of dietary undenatured type II collagen on joint and motor function in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. J Am Nutr Assoc 2023;42(3):224–241; doi: 10.1080/07315724.2021.2024466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523.Schon C, Knaub K, Alt W, et al. UC-II Undenatured Type II collagen for knee joint flexibility: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Integr Complement Med 2022;28(6):540–548; doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524.Lee JO, Kim Y, Lee JM, et al. AP collagen peptides (APCPs) promote hair growth by activating the GSK-3beta/beta-catenin pathway and improve hair condition. Exp Dermatol 2024;33(7):e15137; doi: 10.1111/exd.15137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525.Hwang SB, Park HJ, Lee BH. Hair-growth-promoting effects of the fish collagen peptide in human dermal Papilla Cells and C57BL/6 mice modulating Wnt/beta-Catenin and BMP signaling pathways. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(19):11904; doi: 10.3390/ijms231911904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526.Harris RB, Fonseca FLA, Sharp MH, et al. Functional characterization of undenatured Type II collagen supplements: Are they interchangeable? J Diet (Suppl 2022);19(6):717–732; doi: 10.1080/19390211.2021.1931621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527.Wang Y, Yang S, Zhang L, et al. Effects of different mechanical processes on the structural and powdery properties of insoluble undenatured type II collagen. Food Chem 2023;406:135068; doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528.Rustad AM, Nickles MA, McKenney JE, et al. Myths and media in oral collagen supplementation for the skin, nails, and hair: A review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022;21(2):438–443; doi: 10.1111/jocd.14567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529.Alberts A, Bratu AG, Niculescu AG, et al. Collagen-based wound dressings: Innovations, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Gels 2025;11(4):271; doi: 10.3390/gels11040271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530.Lou J, Xiang Z, Zhu X, et al. Evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of alginate-based dressings in burn wound and donor site wound management associated with burn surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 2025;25(1):215; doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02956-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531.Li Y, Lu Y, Zhao Y, et al. Deciphering the wound-healing potential of collagen peptides and the molecular mechanisms: A review. J Agric Food Chem 2024;72(47):26007–26026; doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c02960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532.She J, Liu J, Mu Y, et al. Recent advances in collagen-based hydrogels: Materials, preparation and applications. Reactive and Functional Polymers 2025;207(106136):106136; doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2024.106136 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 533.Wosicka-Frackowiak H, Poniedzialek K, Wozny S, et al. Collagen and its derivatives serving biomedical purposes: A review. Polymers (Basel) 2024;16(18); doi: 10.3390/polym16182668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534.Lee YI, Lee SG, Kim J, et al. Proteoglycan combined with hyaluronic acid and hydrolyzed collagen restores the skin barrier in mild atopic dermatitis and dry, eczema-prone skin: A pilot study. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(19):10189; doi: 10.3390/ijms221910189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535.Jadach B, Mielcarek Z, Osmałek T. Use of collagen in cosmetic products. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024;46(3):2043–2070; doi: 10.3390/cimb46030132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536.Hasan E, Lewis CJ, Hernandez JG, et al. Layer-by-layer assembly: Advancing skin repair, one layer at a time. RSC Adv 2025;15(18):13908–13923; doi: 10.1039/d4ra08115c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537.Karimzadeh F, Soltani Fard E, Nadi A, et al. Advances in skin gene therapy: Utilizing innovative dressing scaffolds for wound healing, a comprehensive review. J Mater Chem B 2024; 12(25):6033–6062; doi: 10.1039/d4tb00966e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 538.Machado P, Ribeiro FN, Giublin FCW, et al. Next-generation wound care: A scoping review on probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, and postbiotic cutaneous formulations. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2025;18(5):704; doi: 10.3390/ph18050704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539.Debnath S, Agrawal A, Jain N, et al. Collagen as a bio-ink for 3D printing: A critical review. J Mater Chem B 2025;13(6):1890–1919; doi: 10.1039/d4tb01060d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540.Haykal D. Emerging and pioneering ai technologies in aesthetic dermatology: Sketching a path toward personalized, predictive, and proactive care. Cosmetics 2024;11(6):206. [Google Scholar]
- 541.Ahmed R, Syed S, Raziq M. Smart biomaterials and AI-Driven approaches for the tissue engineering advancement. In: G2024 Global Conference on Wireless and Optical Technologies. 2024;pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/GCWOT63882.2024.10805669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 542.Li X, Sheng S, Li G, et al. Research progress in hydrogels for cartilage organoids. Adv Healthc Mater 2024;13(22):e2400431; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543.Clegg JR, Adebowale K, Zhao Z, et al. Hydrogels in the clinic: An update. Bioeng Transl Med 2024;9(6):e10680; doi: 10.1002/btm2.10680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544.Salih T, Caputo M, Ghorbel MT. Recent advances in hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting and its potential application in the treatment of congenital heart disease. Biomolecules 2024;14(7):861; doi: 10.3390/biom14070861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 545.Jie IWK, Lee KWA, Yoon SE, et al. Advancements in clinical utilization of recombinant human collagen: An extensive review. Life (Basel) 2025;15(4):582; doi: 10.3390/life15040582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546.Guo X, Ma Y, Wang H, et al. Status and developmental trends in recombinant collagen preparation technology. Regen Biomater 2024;11:rbad106; doi: 10.1093/rb/rbad106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547.Cheng F, Feng J, Cao Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical application of plant-based products on skin aging in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cosmet Dermatol 2025;24(2):e16710; doi: 10.1111/jocd.16710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548.Basu P, Banerjee A, Okoro PD, et al. Integration of functional polymers and biosensors to enhance wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater 2024;13(29):e2401461; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549.Amirrah IN, Lokanathan Y, Zulkiflee I, et al. A comprehensive review on collagen type i development of biomaterials for tissue engineering: From biosynthesis to bioscaffold. Biomedicines 2022;10(9):2307; doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
