Table 3.
A comparison of 2D materials in improving the photovoltaic features of solar cells
| Material | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSe2/MoS2 (PbS QD) | 0.42 | – | 43.00 | 7.65 | [183] |
| BP:PCBM | 0.81 | 16.00 | 0.64 | 8.30 | [184] |
| MeBThMA-Pb | 1.09 | 18.61 | 60.23 | 12.18 | [174] |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/ MAPbI3 | 0.95 | 23.50 | 48.50 | 13.50 | [171] |
| h-BN/MoSe2 | 0.70 | 24.60 | 70.00 | 14.23 | [185] |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MXene@TiO2/ MAPbI3 | 1.10 | 25.20 | 66.50 | 16.00 | [171] |
| Ti3C2Tx-PSC | 1.06 | 22.83 | 67.52 | 16.38 | [173] |
| Spiro-OMeTAD | 1.10 | 23.32 | 66.14 | 16.93 | [186] |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MoS2/MXene@TiO2/ MAPbI3 | 1.15 | 26.30 | 67.70 | 17.40 | [171] |
| Phosphorene/Au | 1.08 | 23.32 | 0.71 | 17.85 | [187] |
| FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MoSSe/MXene@TiO2/ MAPbI3 | 1.19 | 27.50 | 68.80 | 18.50 | [171] |
| MoS2 QDs/spiro-OMeTAD | 1.06 | 20.98 | 83.02 | 18.98 | [181] |
| f-RGO/spiro-OMeTAD | 1.07 | 22.49 | 80.61 | 19.34 | [181] |
| MoS2 QDs:f-RGO/spiro-OMeTAD | 1.11 | 22.81 | 79.75 | 20.12 | [181] |
| Ti3CNTx-PSC | 1.13 | 24.16 | 73.96 | 20.16 | [173] |
| CNBThMA-Pb | 1.18 | 21.66 | 78.23 | 20.67 | [174] |
| Perovskite/NbS2 | 1.13 | 23.95 | 82.50 | 22.32 | [175] |
| Perovskite/NbSe2 | 1.14 | 23.95 | 84.40 | 23.03 | [175] |