Skip to main content
. 2025 May 24;23(5):869–883. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00977-6

Table 10.

Scenario analyses – deterministic results

Optimal threshold LDL-C (mmol/L) Mean QALYs % on ezetimibe % on inclisiran
Base-case 2.2 6.046 31.2% 13.2%
£15,000 per QALY 2.4 6.021 22.4% 7.8%
£30,000 per QALY 1.7 6.136 61.3% 32.9%
CVD mortality RR 2.7 5.986 9.8% 3.7%
Only PCSK9i 3.2 5.969 4.2% 1.5%
PCSK9i at > 3.5 mmol/L 2.2 6.047 31.2% 13.2%
Atorvastatin cholesterol distribution 2.2 7.753 20.7% 8.9%
Exclude unstable angina 2.2 6.059 31.2% 13.2%
Exclude TIA 2.2 6.046 31.2% 13.2%
Previous statin model utilities 2.2 5.800 31.2% 13.2%
Inclisiran TA Utilities 2.0 6.338 42.3% 18.8%
Ezetimibe 80% adherence 2.4 6.021 17.9% 9.8%
Ezetimibe 50% adherence 2.7 5.993 4.9% 5.9%
Ezetimibe 0% adherence 3.1 5.985 0% 5.9%
Injectables 80% adherence 2.0 6.063 42.3% 15%
Injectables 50% adherence 1.9 6.053 50.6% 11.8%
Injectables 0% adherence 0.8 6.042 99.6% 0%
Different CVD event costs 2.2 6.202 31.0% 12.9%
Volume discounted inclisiran price 1.9 6.095 50.6% 23.7%
Higher inclisiran escalation cost 2.2 6.046 31.2% 13.2%
Pharmacist fee with ezetimibe 2.2 6.046 31.2% 13.2%
Three-cycles LDL-C change adjusted for gender and baseline LDL-C 2.1 6.053 32.9% 14.0%
Statin intolerance 2.2 6.044 37.5% 15.0%

Note: costs are not reported in the table due to the confidentiality of the price of inclisiran and the PCSK9 inhibitors