Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 18;64(4):2961–2980. doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02312-8

Table 6.

BRS mediator role in the relationship between SWBS subscales and CBSFC

Model Mediating variable Effect βeta Std. Error t p Significance
1 BRS SWBS → CBSFC Effect −0.251 0.2230 −3.2515 0.0015* Accept
Direct effect −0.1545 0.2348 −0.6581 0.000* Accept
Indirect effect Confidence interval (−0.9654–0.2443) Yes
2 BRS Transcendence → CBSFC Effect −0.0182 0.3759 −0.0483 0.9615 No
Direct effect 0.3224 0.3302 0.9764 0.3311 No
Indirect effect Confidence interval (−0.9845–0.0118) No
3 BRS Harmony with nature → CBSFC Effect 0.7836 0.9132 0.8581 0.3928 No
Direct effect 1.6938 0.7931 2.1355 0.0350 Accept
Indirect effect Confidence interval (−2.1037–0.0751) No
4 BRS Anomie → CBSFC Effect −2.6619 0.3506 −7.5925 0.000* Accept
Direct effect −2.0762 0.4576 −4.5375 0.000* Accept
Indirect effect Confidence interval (−1.3462–0.1481) No

*p < 0.05, CBSFC caregiving burden scale for family caregivers, SWBS spiritual well-being scale, BRS brief resilience scale