Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 19;15:30457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14552-5

Table 8.

Comparison of Rb and Cs determination by AMS-ICP-MS and AAS.

Elements Sample Method Baseline value(μg·L−1) Spike (μg·L−1) Spiked value (μg·L−1) Recovery (%)
Rb 5 ICP-MS 428 ± 0.5 200 633 ± 3 102 ± 2
AAS 398 ± 1 200 597 ± 4 99.6 ± 2
6 ICP-MS 224 ± 3 200 453 ± 2 114 ± 2
AAS 217 ± 6 200 414 ± 2 98.6 ± 3
Cs 5 ICP-MS 230 ± 0.4 200 458 ± 2 114 ± 1
AAS 223 ± 4 200 424 ± 1 100 ± 2
6 ICP-MS 233 ± 3 200 439 ± 1 103 ± 2
AAS 205 ± 0.1 200 404 ± 2 99.6 ± 1