Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 19;25:2852. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23958-9

Table 3.

Sub-group analysis based on type of helminth parasites

Type of helminth parasites No studies Sample size Infected Pooled prevalence (95% CI) Heterogeneity
I2 τ2 p-value
Toxocara spp. 1 222 23 10.36 (7.08–15.13) - - -
Ascaris lumbricoides 139 123,449 12,011 9.47 (7.32–11.85) 97 5.26 P <.001
Heterophyes heterophyes 1 417 1 8.87 (6.34–11.85) - - -
Schistosoma spp. 30 26,128 2472 7.82 (3.43–13.76) 99 0.0713 P <.001
Trichuris trichiura 105 85,018 6499 5.83 (3.86–8.16) 99 0.0554 P <.001
Hookworms 92 72,923 5421 4.57 (3.30–6.03) 97 0.0239 P <.001
Hymenolepis nana 98 80,871 2427 3.03 (2.35–3.78) 97 0.0099 P <.001
Enterobius vermicularis 86 112,682 3055 2.75 (1.97–3.65) 98 0.0135 P <.001
Rhabditis spp. 1 251 6 2.39 (1.16–5.18) - - -
Taenia spp. 52 55,028 877 2.34 (1.45–3.42) 97 0.0129 P <.001
Fasciola spp. 9 6440 95 1.83 (0. 33–4.36) 95 0.0116 P <.001
Strongyloides stercoralis 33 31,326 576 1.65 (0.76–2.83) 96 0.0129 P <.001
Wuchereria bancrofti 1 1033 15 1.45 (0.81–2.32) - - -
Opisthorchis spp. 8 9092 95 1.44 (0.23–3.55) 95 0.0091 P <.001
Dicrocoelium dendriticum 2 2402 12 0.62 (0.04–1.73) 79 0.11 P <.001
Trichostrongylus spp. 3 3502 23 0.58 (0.01–1.78) 92 0.0022 P <.001
Gongylonema spp. 1 417 1 0. 24 (0.04–1.33) - - -