TABLE 1.
Results of AU testa
| Fragment | Topology | P value |
|---|---|---|
| W1 | W1 | 0.997 |
| W2 | 2 × 10−13 | |
| W3 | 4 × 10−80 | |
| F | 0.003 | |
| W2 | W1 | 9 × 10−62 |
| W2 | 1.000 | |
| W3 | 1 × 10−40 | |
| F | 3 × 10−49 | |
| W3 | W1 | 5 × 10−07 |
| W2 | 6 × 10−52 | |
| W3 | 1.000 | |
| F | 5 × 10−06 | |
| F | W1 | 1 × 10−48 |
| W2 | 7 × 10−05 | |
| W3 | 1 × 10−118 | |
| F | 1.000 |
a
The fit of four tree topologies (calculated from full alignment [F] and three fragments) was evaluated for full-length alignment and three fragments. The significantly better topology per analyzed fragment is shown in bold. In all cases, the tree topology calculated for each data set is significantly better than the alternatives.