Table 4.
Proportion of students whose behavior at follow-up we predicted correctly with different models.
| Initiation | Recent sex | Sex without a condom | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLS (joint) | Lasso (joint) | Lasso (joint with implicit main effects) | OLS (separate) | OLS (joint) | Lasso (joint) | Lasso (joint with implicit main effects) | OLS (separate) | OLS (joint) | Lasso (joint) | Lasso (joint with implicit main effects) | OLS (separate) | |
| Total | 0.806 | 0.801 | 0.808 | 0.811 | 0.812 | 0.813 | 0.854 | 0.846 | 0.848 | |||
| Boys | 0.773 | 0.752 | 0.780 | 0.798 | 0.784 | 0.795 | 0.799 | 0.825 | 0.843 | 0.812 | 0.818 | 0.849 |
| Girls | 0.820 | 0.828 | 0.822 | 0.835 | 0.829 | 0.822 | 0.821 | 0.834 | 0.862 | 0.870 | 0.870 | 0.877 |
| Black | 0.803 | 0.795 | 0.802 | 0.808 | 0.806 | 0.805 | 0.807 | 0.818 | 0.858 | 0.847 | 0.848 | 0.856 |
| All other races | 0.814 | 0.820 | 0.831 | 0.913 | 0.827 | 0.837 | 0.834 | 0.876 | 0.840 | 0.840 | 0.847 | 0.911 |
| Grade 9 | 0.810 | 0.807 | 0.822 | 0.827 | 0.836 | 0.834 | 0.832 | 0.857 | 0.900 | 0.887 | 0.891 | 0.907 |
| Grade 10 | 0.801 | 0.793 | 0.791 | 0.801 | 0.792 | 0.796 | 0.798 | 0.818 | 0.820 | 0.817 | 0.821 | 0.856 |
| LGB | 0.833 | 0.833 | 0.833 | . | 0.794 | 0.794 | 0.778 | . | 0.841 | 0.825 | 0.810 | . |
| Non-LGB | 0.804 | 0.799 | 0.807 | . | 0.812 | 0.813 | 0.815 | . | 0.855 | 0.847 | 0.850 | . |
Note: OLS (joint) is the OLS model estimated on all students. Lasso (joint) is the traditional lasso model estimated on all students. Lasso (joint, with implicit main effect) is the lasso model with the addition of all baseline variables that were selected in the interaction terms. OLS (separate) are OLS regressions stratified by the demographic characteristic listed on the left. OLS = Ordinary least squares; LGB = Lesbian, gay, and bisexual.