Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043502

Table 6.

Sensitivity analysis of the combined model (CT-ECV + CEA + CA19-9 + NLR).

Analysis type Subgroup/adjustment OR (95% CI) AUC change
Base model Total (n = 200) 2.15 (1.68–2.75)* 0.91 (0.86–0.96)*
Histology
 Non-mucinous (n = 168) 2.12 (1.63–2.76)* 0.90 (0.85–0.95)*
 Mucinous (n = 32) 2.24 (1.58–3.18)* 0.89 (0.82–0.96)*
Stage stratification
 Stage I–II (n = 120) 2.08 (1.59–2.72)* 0.88 (0.82–0.94)*
 Stage III–IV (n = 80) 2.19 (1.67–2.87)* 0.87 (0.81–0.93)*
Methodological adjustments
 Multiple imputation (Missing data) 2.13 (1.65–2.74)* ΔAUC = −0.01*
 Outlier removal (±3SD) 2.11 (1.64–2.71)* ΔAUC = −0.02*
Inter-observer variation
 Radiologist A (CT-ECV measurement) 2.16 (1.67–2.79)* 0.91 (0.86–0.96)*
 Radiologist B (CT-ECV measurement) 2.14 (1.66–2.76)* 0.90 (0.85–0.95)*

AUC = area under the curve, CA19-9 = carbohydrate antigen 19-9, CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen, CI = confidence interval, CT-ECV = computed tomography-derived extracellular volume fraction, NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, OR = odds ratio, SD = standard deviation.

*

Statistical significance, P < .05.