Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2025 Apr 2;85(8):1509–1524.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.03.005

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics.

#1 FOXP3ΔN_TTG 24 (EMDB-46499) (PDB: 9D2L ) #2 FOXP3ΔN_TTT TG15_3DNA (EMDB-46480) (PDB:9D22) #3 FOXP3ΔN_TTT TG15_2DNA_1 (EMDB-46493) (PDB:9D2E) #4 FOXP3ΔN_TTTT G15_2DNA_2 (EMDB-46498) (PDB: 9D2J)
Data collection and processing
Magnification 105000 105000 105000 105000
Voltage (kV) 300 300 300 300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 60 60 60 60
Defocus range (μm) −0.8 to −2.2 −0.8 to −2.2 −0.8 to −2.2 −0.8 to −2.2
Pixel size (Å) 0.827 0.827 0.827 0.827
Symmetry imposed C2 C1 C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 2535992 1327974 1327974 1327974
Final particle images (no.) 1340131 630564 195660 259858
Map resolution (Å) 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.8
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) 7TDX 7TDX 7TDX 7TDX
Model resolution (Å) 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.1
 FSC threshold 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −168.5 −75.0 −54.9 −75.3
Model composition
 Non-hydrogen atoms 24688 13390 9580 9304
 Protein residues 2471 968 705 695
 Ligands 386 264 186 186
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.004
 Bond angles (°) 0.596 0.562 0.635 0.595
Validation
 Clashscore 8.64 6.58 12.73 8.79
 Poor rotamers (%) 3.41 3.50 4.31 4.52
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 92.92 93.87 94.19 91.90
 Allowed (%) 7.08 6.13 5.81 8.10
 Disallowed (%) 0 0 0 0