Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 21;15:30798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16815-7

Table 11.

Comparison of Multi-Objective optimization Performance.

Method Hyper volume (HV) Spacing (SP) Vis. Sat. range PDOP range Cost (Sats) range Min. Vis. range
Improved GA (This study) 0.78 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.01 12.1–14.9 2.1–2.8 88–100 3.8–4.5
D-NSDE 0.72 ± 0.03* 0.18 ± 0.02* 11.5–14.0 2.3–3.2 85–100 3.5-4.0
PSO 0.65 ± 0.04* 0.25 ± 0.03* 10.8–13.2 2.7–3.6 80–100 3.0-3.8
SA 0.58 ± 0.05* 0.32 ± 0.04* 10.0-12.5 3.0–4.0 75–100 2.8–3.5

* indicates statistically significant differences compared to the improved GA (p < 0.05). Ranges represent the minimum–maximum values of solutions on the Pareto front for each objective.