Table 11.
Comparison of Multi-Objective optimization Performance.
| Method | Hyper volume (HV) | Spacing (SP) | Vis. Sat. range | PDOP range | Cost (Sats) range | Min. Vis. range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved GA (This study) | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 12.1–14.9 | 2.1–2.8 | 88–100 | 3.8–4.5 |
| D-NSDE | 0.72 ± 0.03* | 0.18 ± 0.02* | 11.5–14.0 | 2.3–3.2 | 85–100 | 3.5-4.0 |
| PSO | 0.65 ± 0.04* | 0.25 ± 0.03* | 10.8–13.2 | 2.7–3.6 | 80–100 | 3.0-3.8 |
| SA | 0.58 ± 0.05* | 0.32 ± 0.04* | 10.0-12.5 | 3.0–4.0 | 75–100 | 2.8–3.5 |
* indicates statistically significant differences compared to the improved GA (p < 0.05). Ranges represent the minimum–maximum values of solutions on the Pareto front for each objective.