Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 21;16:7809. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63001-4

Fig. 4. Comparison and analysis of the effects of different enhancement strategies.

Fig. 4

a, c, e, g, i, k Joint distributions of node flow and degree for Nets 1–6, and the Black Swan nodes are emphasized with triangles outlined in black. b, d, f, h, j, l The critical percolation thresholds under four scenarios for Nets 1–6. “O” represents the origin network without any enhancement strategy, “C” denotes the CML-based strategy, “F” signifies the flow-based strategy, “D” corresponds to the degree-based strategy, and “Rd” represents the random-based strategy. a, c, e, g Nets 1–4 exhibit analogous characteristics in their joint flow-degree distributions. i, k Nets 5 and 6 also manifest comparable joint flow-degree distribution characteristics. b, d, f, h Within Nets 1–4, the flow-based strategy and degree-based strategy show parallel performance. j and l In Nets 5 and 6, the performance of the CML-based strategy aligns closely with that of the flow-based strategy.