Table 5.
ANOVA and fit statistics comparing linear, two-factor interaction (2FI), and quadratic polynomial models.
| Reponses | dry density (/) | Cohesion (kN/m2) | internal friction angle (°) | compressibility coefficient Cc (/) | Swelling coefficient Cg (/) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model tested (1) | Linear polynomials | ||||
| R2 | 0.9628 | 0.9594 | 0.9774 | 0.9662 | 0.9988 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9594 | 0.9558 | 0.9754 | 0.9631 | 0.9986 |
| Predicted R2 | 0.9433 | 0.9397 | 0.9705 | 0.9537 | 0.9983 |
| Model F value | 284.36 | 260.25 | 476.35 | 314.23 | 8852.15 |
| Model P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
| Model remarks | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant |
| Model tested (2) | Two-factor interaction (2FI) | ||||
| R2 | 0.9979 | 0.9869 | 0.9775 | 0.9789 | 0.9988 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9975 | 0.9843 | 0.9730 | 0.9746 | 0.9986 |
| Predicted R2 | 0.9958 | 0.9796 | 0.9607 | 0.9632 | 0.9982 |
| Model F value | 2394.83 | 377.17 | 217.47 | 231.64 | 4282.00 |
| Model P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
| Model remarks | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant |
| Model tested (3) | Quadratic polynomials | ||||
| Standard deviation | 0.0031 | 0.9482 | 0.7020 | 0.0014 | 0.0004 |
| Mean | 1.66 | 31.69 | 14.81 | 0.1470 | 0.0399 |
| R2 | 0.9979 | 0.9869 | 0.9775 | 0.9789 | 0.9988 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9975 | 0.9843 | 0.9730 | 0.9746 | 0.9986 |
| Predicted R2 | 0.9958 | 0.9796 | 0.9607 | 0.9632 | 0.9982 |
| Adequate precision | 125.8695 | 50.1427 | 38.6144 | 39.5951 | 171.3478 |
| Model F value | 2394.83 | 377.17 | 217.47 | 231.64 | 4282.00 |
| Model P value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
| Model remarks | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant |
| model adopted | Quadratic | Quadratic | Quadratic | Quadratic | Quadratic |
R2 coefficient of determination, MSE mean square error, ANOVA analysis of variance.