Table 6.
Participants’ Evaluation of Educational Interventions: Responses of “Excellent” or “Good”
|
Excellent or Good Rating, No. (%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Low Risk |
High Risk |
|||
| Attributes | Counselor Group (n = 59) | Computer Group (n = 53) | Counselor Group (n = 43) | Computer Group (n = 50) |
| Being easy to understand | 58 (98) | 53 (100) | 43 (100) | 50 (100) |
| Providing adequate explanation | 59 (100) | 53 (100) | 42 (98) | 47 (94) |
| Enough information to decide* | 57 (97) | 46 (87) | 43 (100) | 42 (86) |
| Respecting privacy | 57 (98) | 51 (98) | 42 (98) | 49 (98) |
| Helping to understand options | 57 (97) | 52 (98) | 41 (98) | 47 (96) |
| Addressing emotional concerns | 53 (96) | 46 (90) | 42 (98) | 46 (96) |
| Learning at own pace | 58 (98) | 53 (100) | 40 (3) | 46 (94) |
| Providing reassurance† | 56 (97) | 43 (83) | 41 (95) | 45 (92) |
| Making good use of time‡ | 54 (92) | 53 (100) | 42 (98) | 44 (88) |
Counselor group had significantly more excellent or good responses than computer group in high-risk women (P = .01).
Counselor group had significantly more excellent or good responses than computer group in low-risk women (P = .02).
Computer group had significantly more excellent or good responses than counselor group in low-risk women (P = .03).