Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 7;9:e76850. doi: 10.2196/76850

Table 3.

Association between the APOBa rs676210 genotype and lipid profile outcomes: crude and adjusted estimates with multivariable linear regression.

Outcome Crude estimate P valueb Model 1c adjusted β (SE; 95% CI) Model 1 P value Model 2d adjusted β (SE; 95% CI) Model 2 P value FDR-Pe
HDL-Cf .03 –0.157 (0.087; –0.330 to 0.016) .07 –0.135 (0.088; –0.310 to 0.040) .13 .07
LDL-Cg <.001 0.877 (0.237; 0.403 to 1.352) <.001 0.922 (0.242; 0.439 to 1.405 <.001 .002
Non–HDL-C .03 0.673 (0.288; 0.098 to 1.249) .02 0.745 (0.292; 0.162 to 1.328) .01 .04
ApoB .02 11.406 (5.163; 1.092 to 21.720) .03 12.490 (5.247; 2.004 to 22.975) .02 .04

aAPOB: apolipoprotein B.

bCrude P values from unadjusted comparisons between genotype groups.

cModel 1: age, sex, and BMI.

dModel 2: age, sex, BMI, and diabetes.

eFDR-P: false discovery rate–adjusted P value calculated for model 1 comparisons to account for multiple testing.

fHDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

gLDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.