Table 2. Survey Responses for Self-Reported Estimated Usage and Likelihood to Recommend Ambient Documentation Technology.
| Estimated usage | Responses, No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Mass General Brigham a | |
| Estimation of use of AI-generated drafts (n = 264) | |
| I have not used AI-generated draft notes | 4 (1.5) |
| ≤24% of visits | 93 (35.2) |
| 25%-49% of visits | 39 (14.8) |
| 50%-74% of visits | 45 (17.1) |
| ≥75% of visits | 83 (31.4) |
| Overall likelihood to recommend, median (IQR) (n = 148)b,c | 8.0 (6.0-9.5) |
| Emory Healthcare d | |
| Estimation of use of AI-generated drafts (n = 62) | |
| None of my notes | 7 (11.3) |
| Few of my notes | 12 (19.4) |
| Some of my notes | 16 (25.8) |
| Most of my notes | 16 (25.8) |
| All of my notes | 11 (17.7) |
| Overall likelihood to recommend, median (IQR)b | 8.0 (6.0-10.0) |
Abbreviation: AI, artificial intelligence.
Midsurvey responses at 42 days.
Likelihood-to-recommend scale of 1 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more likely to recommend.
Postsurvey responses at 84 days.
Postsurvey responses at 60 days.