Table 2.
Function-wise ranks, total rank, and average rank for each optimization algorithm across the 10 selected CEC2019 benchmark functions.
| Function/optimizer | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 | Total rank | Avg. rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFOX | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 1.8 |
| FDO | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 31 | 3.1 |
| ANA | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 32 | 3.2 |
| FOX | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 3.4 |
| LEO | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 38 | 3.8 |
| GOOSE | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 52 | 5.2 |
Lower ranks indicate better performance.